After I went through security line in airport last week, I was stopped by four gorilla goons. They had sloped forehead and dressed in all-black jumpsuit, very small expressionless hazel eyes. I am not sure if this was human. It was possibly a mutant specie, or in fact they were wearing humanoid face mask. I have heard the grays are something like this. Our friend Hakan reported that the grays are not aliens from outer space, but that what we see as the gray alien type is, in fact, an exosuit, much like our space suit. And underneath, they are made of very fine filigree scales, or purplish glowing neon skin, being the descendants of very intelligent dinosaurs that escaped the asteroid underground and evolved into this very fine filigreed, very skinny

creature. The gray suit is merely their armor and they travel in craft that emerge from certain openings underground. There is also a report from Mozambique or Lesotho, I forget which, in which this African chief talks about having tasted the flesh of the graze. He says a UFO craft crash landed and that they ate the grey meat. It is supposed to impart certain qualities to you upon ingestion. In any case, that's the sense I got that my abductors were wearing human skin suit like in certain story of H.P. Lovecraft where he described the frightful beings, the me-go. I was taken to a remote location, hood on my head. At this place, horrors began. I was stripped naked by two women with similar face, very square,

an extremely powerful tank-like physique, built like an East German fridge. These Helgas undressed me after this. Then I was tied to the metal frame of an old bedpost, where I was repeatedly hosed down with high pressure water by these same type of lesbian guards, lesbian, okay, they fixated a vicious yellow light on me, not allowing to sleep, it penetrated blankets, and then repeatedly hosed me down with water. Occasionally they beat me with rubber baton as I'm struggling against iron corrugated metal bed frame. I was tortured for days by these detrimental robots at a rendering site until I called on the power of Amaterasu Omikami, the burning eternal sun. She sent a burning ray of light into the building that came within me and filled my nude body with a sacred fire.

She kindled a great fire on my head and shoulders to frighten my captors and I broke through the bonds and slammed open the rusted metal door with such force that they fled in fear and terror from me. You know, I have a tweet about the future in which the Muslims, they tried to censor this tweet. It was a vision that greatly frightened them. I said that one day I will enter Mecca, nude, lathered in coconut oil. I will shine in the hot desert sun as if holy Amaterasu sent a great fire on me. And all the pilgrims and worshippers will come out of the shrines of Makkah and be amazed to see me, nude and glistening, walking proudly on the streets of that city toward where they keep the meteorite. What do you think will happen when I do this?

One day I will be declared the Amir al-Muminin, the commander of the faithful. All the shrines of Islam will worship my name. Anyway, what I was saying was this is how I broke through the prison where they were keeping me and now I make for you this show. From now on I will try to put out show on Friday evenings regularly. But please be warned, this is a last show that will be available in full to non-subscribers. I work hard to make these shows for you, so from now on the first half of the show will be free, but the full show only to subscribers. But to make up for this, I will make each show longer, so it will be one hour long, so first 30 minutes will always be in public for free. The service is gum road and I have spoken to them it is a small startup by San Francisco

people but they are quite committed to your privacy from what they claim. In any case for full security use burner email and I suggest you also use prepaid credit card instead of your own which can be anonymous. That is useful by the way for many online things. I am sorry to talk such pedestrian matters but I must announce that for 8th show will be less show that will be completely free. From now on I must protect my show with some kind of firewall because the new world order is trying to crush me. Go immediately to break. I now talk to you about the most serious attacks on me. I'm sorry if this section is too pedantic for you but please listen because much is this take. I'm actually surprised at myself for not having discussed this before on my

own platforms, either on this show or on my own Twitter. I did talk about it in my interview with Jack Murphy, but it's not enough. I must repeat this. You must know that the Politico piece on me, which their most shared article that day, and what is very concerning is who shared it. It was Peter Daou. Do you know who he is? He is a Democrat nutjob strategist, a major backer of Hillary Clinton in 2016 and a fanatic. Him, Brian Butler, many others from the top left Democrat media establishment shared that article. Now the violence insinuations aren't really of concern to me. There are lazy and dumb Some journalists who now absurdly try to tie Heidegger to these shooters. Most of who, of course, are Antifa shooters, or insane, or many times completely made up. But let's leave that aside.

It's not what concerns me. Rather, the other accusation, that I supposedly have readers in the White House, which may or may not be true. I have no way of knowing, but if they do read me in the White House, I have readers, like Like I say also in Japan, in Scandinavia or in Brazil, I have readers all over the world because they enjoy my book. It's fun book to read. It's spread by word of mouth. Believe me, all the marketing in the world, all the promotion can't make up for that. And that will happen only when people enjoy it. They spread it by word of mouth. Speaking of which, there was another media piece on me this last week from Sweden. The major Swedish evening paper Aftonbladet did a book review that talked about my book

in a very positive light, in fact, even though this is a very leftist paper. They actually tried to engage what I talk about in my book a little bit, and they talk about Homer in a way I disagree with, but, you know, they tried to talk about books and literature and poetry. They didn't just try, like American media, to insinuate I'm somehow connected to violence in order to slander me and to bring the weight of the security state on my back, like American journalists do. In America, that new republic journalist or that girl who's obsessed with me, it's the equivalent of calling teacher on me. Teacher, teacher, Bap said something naughty. Teacher, in this case, is men with guns. who teacher is. See, these people can't compete with me as a writer. They can't appeal to

any audience other than their own fart-huffing circles. So their tactic instead is to try to focus law enforcement on my back. Isn't there a professional miscarriage of your duty as a journalist or your dignity as a writer when you're essentially calling the cops on another writer instead of arguing with him because that's what these people are doing and I think they know it but okay let's leave them off for a moment in Sweden the leftists did not try that they actually tried to engage with my book and were receptive to its charms they didn't report me to the UN or Interpol in any case the point is I have readers all over the world so if some Some people in the White House read me it means nothing special.

But this political article, the real accusation wasn't the violence one, but the second one. That there is a white supremacist right wing conspiracy centered in the White House. That my book is at the center of this white supremacist conspiracy. That I'm corrupting the Trump administration with my evil doctrines. that were radicalizing the military, that's really the gold target for them, you see. Because if they can mean that hysteria into the security establishment, they can have investigations. In this context, you must remember that Biden started his campaign at Charlottesville. And that's for a reason after the failure of the Russia hoax. This is what they're going with, white nationalist Trump corrupting American society and the

brave Democrat together with the security state against him. It's all out of the old Hillary Clinton playbook where she's on tape in the 1990s talking about and this is in her words, a vast right wing conspiracy against her clown husband. Well, it's the same thing now. I just didn't realize how crazy they are, that they tried to place my book at the center of it. Please understand, this is not mere self-aggrandizement on my part. It isn't self-promotion. I wish it just were. It isn't a delusion of grandeur on my part or a joke. I wish it were. But just look at who shared the Politico article against me, and look where they will go with this. I suppose they will try to dox. And after that, they will claim that I'm a foreign influence operation in the White House.

It's as clear as can be what they're trying to do, and absolutely ridiculous. And the only defense I have is to make their pathetic schemes public now, early, before they have a chance to put them into action and to tell you about what they're going to do. entirely possible that there will be congressional hearings on the Bronze Age pervert in 2020, led by Maxine Waters or some such. I could have fun with that. But the truth is, I have no intention of being George Papadopoulos, of spending time in jail, of being the patsy for their contrived conspiracy theories for Russia hoax 2.0. You know, Mueller, or rather his team, since he's just had his brain replaced by a fluid-filled central vacuole, he's out to lunch, he's senile, but his team indicted the Russians, supposedly

for election interference. But if you look at what it really was, it was an ad agency, an advertising agency for catering companies that Mueller indicted. It was based in Russia, but these guys, this ad agency, tried to ride on the back of election traffic in 2016 by promoting their product with the Trump or Hillary memes. And I think actually they mostly promoted Hillary, but this is what Mueller's team, which is really the CIA and other rogue security agencies that pretend to run America, this is the pathetic scheme they went for. So don't think they wouldn't try something similar with me or to get me questioned by a Peter Stroke clone or things like of this sort. So I have to call them out early and I'll do it on this show and I'll do it elsewhere.

Although in truth it might be great fun for me to testify in public, to appear nude in congress and for Maxine Waters and Adam Schiff to have large clipboards with my tweets. In particular, I want that image with the male model Mark Fitt with Cappuccino to make it into CNN and to the august halls of Congress. At that point, Trump will be able to say in the style of a Roman Caesar that Congress has abolished itself. So may it be. If you believe Buddhism is a religion of submission or peace, you are a fool. Please look at Kalachakra Tantra and the wise vision of the Tibetan sages, that a great scourge will arise out of the Himalayas and lay waste to all Islam. It is no wonder that I praise the monk Virat Hu on my timeline on Twitter.

I posted videos of him and I encourage you to find others. Unfortunately they are scrubbing YouTube of anything interesting. But you can see him talk about all kinds of interesting things that your hippy Buddhist loving friends who know nothing about real Buddhism, you can use him to troll them. He talk about ethnic conflict. He talk about defending his community and his nation. Him and the monks in Sri Lanka is very strange. The global reaction to Islam begins in Greece, in Sri Lanka, in Burma and in Angola where And I think they banned the building of new mosques a year or two ago. What this means, what a surprise. Now the matter of Islam itself is a little complicated. On one hand I'm very much against this discourse where we're supposed to freak out about Islamization,

about Islam, and to frame everything in terms of this war of religions or ideologies, of Islam versus the secular liberal West. I really don't care what Muslims believe. I just want them in their own countries. They can worship a goat there. They can worship a piece of wood, shaped like a phallus, like the ancient tribesmen of Khwarezm did. I really don't care. It's not about Islam, it's about mass third world immigration. I don't want Arabs in France, no matter what they believe in. They don't belong in Europe even if they convert to Christianity. Let them do that or whatever they want in their own countries. Furthermore, if you focus so much on Islam, what will you say to the most serious type of mass third world immigration which might come from Christian or nominally Christian Africa?

The implication of focus on Islam is that this is okay. But, of course, it's just as much, if not more, of a civilization-destroying event. In many cases, like in Holland, I believe Islam itself is quite a small percentage of the population, even though the share of immigrants overall is quite large. So the problem is not Islam itself, but immigration. I believe these immigrants all need eventually to peacefully return, and hopefully willingly return to their own countries. They are not invaders either. You should never use that idiotic language. Islam did not come to Europe with 100 tank divisions. It was brought in by finance capital, by the large employers, and especially by the leadership of the political left, which as you well know, uses them both as a way

to get votes and as a way to bust Europe's borders. They were brought in by the political leadership. This was Merkel's intention. So these are people who are invited in. They are not invaders. And frankly, what do you expect from them? What do you want a Muslim to do? You know, in Holland, I heard they forced some Muslim immigrants to watch a video of two men kissing, to see that they are okay with that. That's where the logic of this war of religion or war of ideology's insanity leads. I don't blame a Muslim for rejecting totally this insanity. Wouldn't you? When you get caught up in the denunciation of Islam in particular, correct though in some sense it may be an alien though Islam may be to Europe, nevertheless when you get caught up, it's a rhetorical frame where as you see,

you eventually lose. The focus must be on the problem of immigration and on the reasons mass immigration has been promoted against the will of the native peoples, by the large financial interests and by politicians who are farming votes. That has to be the argument, not Islam as such, not belief. It is incredible ignorance and arrogance to go around talking like these fools do about how we have to reform Islam. You can't reform your own children's education, and you're not going to reform Islam. That is up to the Muslims. And frankly, I don't care what they do, as long as they do it in their own countries. Now, however, you must consider the other side of everything I've said so far. Everything I've said is true and I believe it, but it's also true that Islam has a special place

in the toolkit of the globalists. This is partly because of the Saudi connection to America or the Gulf connection in general, whether Saud or other Gulf states. They have American politicians and lobbyists over a barrel, but it's deeper, I think. They use Islam consciously or not as a way to destabilize other traditional societies and to promote chaos. Whether in Burma or the Philippines, The globalist always sides with the Muslim, isn't it so strange? So in this sense, in this second sense, there is a kind of global struggle going on against Islam, insofar as it is a special weapon of the cabal running the West right now. And of course, the most logical step would be for America and Russia to make an alliance

to deal with this international problem, as also with the migration flows from the global south and perhaps also to keep China in its own sphere, but that alliance is very far from coming about. In any case, in this struggle Buddhism is a powerful ally in the meantime. Buddhism is not pacifism and I would say that if you believe Buddhism is peace you misunderstand the teaching of Buddha. The early Buddhists were basically genocidal skinheads who wanted to wipe out most of the population of India, they wanted to annihilate everything that exists. It is, though you do not know it, a philosophy of nihilistic purgation, of great cleansing, and historically the Tibetans had no hesitation. They created a medieval empire stretching into Siberia.

They burned down the Chinese capital that went by the totalitarian name Perpetual Peace. Their scriptures tell of stories of a great Buddhist army that will descend from the mountains and wipe out much of the world, much of Islam in particular. This strain of Buddhism, this understanding is hidden from you today. And in many ways it is hidden from themselves too. I don't mean to say we ratu or the Sri Lankan monks are this in any explicit way. They are rather nationalists and protectors of their own communities. It's perfectly normal, but I would say they have this hidden spirit that moves them, which they may never talk about in public. The Buddha, remember, he said the home is a place of filth, and it was the filth of

life that motivated him, that motivated his escape, the filth of third world life. And like I said in the book, it was an attempt to re-establish the freedom of the step only this time within the great expand of the inland empire, of the great mind, but the outer meaning of annihilation never left them. I will have to talk about Buddhist vitalism another time though, just thought about this when I imagine myself yet again nude and shining on the streets of Makkah and all the worshippers that running out amazed at me and paying obeisance to my might. origin of ancient states that I promised you. It seems I will have to delay yet again a full discussion of this matter of ancient constitutions to another time, but I wanted to tell you this time about the phalanx.

You all know about the phalanx from watching Spartan movie 300 or from your own studies, but there are interesting theories about how it was the phalanx that was the root or cause of the republican form of government. The theory goes that the kinds of soldiers who form the phalanx will necessarily result in a republican government. But to see why this is so, you must first consider what the phalanx really is. And I apologize if I repeat things here that many of you already know. But it's interesting to remember, even for those who know, the phalanx soldier isn't just some guy who puts on a random armor, who paints his face and goes screaming like a lunatic lunging at enemy like you see a movie. You have to consider first of all the

immense investment in time and money that goes into the Phalanx soldier equipment and training. The armor is heavy bronze. Most of you would collapse under this armor today. At Marathon, the Athenians ran at the Persians from almost a mile away under this heavy bronze armor I should think most athletes even today would fall flat even with all steroids and supplements would fall flat dead after that. But actually after winning this battle the entire Athenian army force marched again with this heavy armor on back to Athens to prevent a Persian landing there. This is, in my view, the real miracle of Marathon, and again it is a feat that almost no athlete or strongman would be ready for today. That's what they developed those magnificent physiques for, to bear this heavy armor.

And so the gyms were a necessity for the class of soldier, or hoplite as the heavy infantry was called. The other equipment was heavy as well, a thick shield of wood as thick as a cutting board covered with bronze and then rawhide, a tall ashen spear, also very heavy. This amazing heavy expensive equipment. Consider then also the way they fought. The shield basically covered you from let's say upper nose or forehead to your shins and you carried it in left arm and the phalanx was in a rank so you covered the guy to your left with your shield. Most of the right side of his body and you were covered by the guy to your right. The spears came in between and the phalanx could be one rank deep or several. You can imagine the

immense discipline and training this formation takes. The siebens defeated finally for the first time the spartans by making the left side of their phalanx many ranks deep. This This is because the Thebans were rather odd at the time. They were ruled by Paestagorean lunatics, Epaminondas and Pelopidas were the names. And the Paestagoreans worship the left side for some reason. I am not allowed to say here. In any case, this formation of warfare takes much training to perfect because there is a lot of obviously maneuvering and synchronizing. It must be done all together. So you can see the immense investment in time and money that phalanx warfare took per soldier. You can also see immense trust it required of the soldiers to have in each other.

This military formation was unbeatable at the time. It was later improved on by Macedonians and after that in a different way by the Romans, but it was unbeatable in classical age. At times they took on armies of Persians or other barbarians, many times their size in one without taking any casualties at all. Most barbarian weapons could not ever penetrate that armor, let alone the shield, nor was there any comparable training either physically or in military tactics. If it is the tactics you are interested in, by the way, and the military science, you You should read, for example, Xenophon's Anabasis. It is good book to start with, Anabasis. I suggested it before on BAP Book Club, Sunday Book Suggestions.

It tells the story of a Greek mercenary army stuck in the heartland of Persian Empire, in modern day Iraq, and of their adventures on the way back to Greece. And you can see there how the science of military tactics and formation had developed to such a great degree among the Greeks, and how indeed the great battle in the beginning of that book of the Anabasis, they win it without taking any casualties, I think, something like two wounded. It was unbeatable. You can also see in that book how they form deliberative bodies, and a kind of democracy on the move. It is easy to see how the argument goes, but I must now again take break. Go immediately break. Men, as I described, that form the heavy infantry in the phalanx, and you must know they were

accompanied also by light infantry and by servants and so forth, but such men are not likely to be ruled by another class, or even by one man who orders them around like slaves. The argument of Victor Davis Hanson in particular, who is a very good historian, and whatever you may believe of his political opinions, which used to be vaguely neo-Koneish. But his early books on Greek warfare and Greek farming are very important, and his idea goes basically that these were well-to-do farmers with their own small farms or estates, and they could not afford to be away from their land for a long time. They had to wage war in brief and decisive close quarters engagement. So the clash of two phalanxes, this it goes, is how this form of warfare developed and with it the republic.

Because such men would no longer be ruled by the mounted horse aristocracy that had dominated Greece before. You know horses will not charge a phalanx with the pikes out. So this formation was unbeatable, for example, against ancient cavalry. But yes, the theory is that this new form of warfare led to the republican government as such, because free and independent farmers created their own governments then. You can think it through. But please also remember, this armor was expensive. You had to pay for it yourself, and if you couldn't, you fell out of the hoplite class. The Greek states never had, of course, modern free market. But you obviously do need capital. You need factories, workshops, extraction of natural resources to create this kind of equipment on a mass scale especially.

It simply wasn't available to unfree peoples. So in every way this intense investment in the individual soldier militates against despotism. It militates instead for true citizenship. I mean real citizenship, where the citizen represents a locus of actual physical force, where he has a role and identity in the state, where he's not just a nameless anonymous clerk, as the majority might be, for example, in the steaming rat piles of the Orient that go under the name of cities, the clerk in Vietnam or Thailand, who lived an entirely anonymous existence as a shade. The Western conception of citizenship is unique. There is no word for citizen in languages not touched by Greek or Roman heritage. I'm sorry, Hazomi,

and I'm sorry fans of the Hebrew Bible, so-called. That's not where the Western government and citizenship come from. But this theory, promoted by Victor Hansen in particular, it is precedent But you can see even in Aristotle who argues something very similar. He says that ancient Greece was run by a mounted aristocracy who held their power because of their mastery of horses, but that the phalanx took over from them and founded the republican form of government. You can see, you know, the nobility in classical Greece even continued to be called horsemen, knight men in some way at times. Same as in ancient Rome. You can have quite a few more farmers in a phalanx than you can have mountain warriors in the same territory. Imagine how

much grazing land a horse takes as opposed to how much land you need to run a farm. And Greece is not especially well suited to the raising of horses. It's not the steppe. In any case, so goes the theory, and it sounds good, and many do accept it. The problem is, this theory is a little bit wrong. The Phalanx did not develop in this way. In fact, the Hoplite Warrior, the whole equipment I just told you about, this all precedes the development of the Phalanx, the development of the tactic where they fight together. Initially, the heavy infantrymen that I just described fought alone, as an individual. It was a new military technology that developed in archaic Greece and was first used not by human farmers in a group, but by mercenaries alone, like champions and mercenaries on their

own and adventurers. And the first people to really put this new military technology to use were not Republicans or Democrats, but enterprising men of the type I praised in the third part of my book. Men like Periander of Corinth, whose name literally means Superman. These were the first tyrants, and they took over their state easily by forming companies of adventurers fighting with this new technology. The first coin minted, the first currency, was created to give regular payments of precious metals to such adventurers. I wonder what the libertarians have to say about that. Will we see Bitcoin tyranny come about soon? It may be true that quite a bit later this technology, the military technology I mean, was adopted by the human farmer and served as the physical and spiritual backbone of

the republican form of government, but not in its beginnings. You can see the origin of the state is never quite so consensual and pleasant as many imagine. Nietzsche says it is always the same, brotherhoods of blond beasts that impose themselves on the lower ranks. And I think there's a lesson here for our time to think about, namely how military technology may be able to change the form of the leviathan quite soon. I will be right back. I noticed something very strange in my coffee. I believe the waiter at this restaurant, he spit in my coffee. I be right back. Someday I may have to videotape myself fighting waiters in restaurants, entering kitchens. The French Revolution brought about the mass raising of armies of the common man. And this has never really changed.

What mattered also in World War II was mass mobilization of armies of not especially well-trained or competent soldiers. It was the war still of cannon fodder. Patton didn't have such good impression of the Western infantry as opposed to the German of the Allied infantry. Of course, America now invests quite a bit more in each soldier, in equipment, in training, and of course there is no longer a mass draft for now. But military technology has, I believe, remained quite stagnant when it comes to the toolkit of the individual soldier, and I mean so of course entirely in relative ways, relative for example to the revolutionary changes induced by the discovery of the ancient hoplites' equipment in archaic Greece, or the discovery of iron before that, or of cavalry tactics around 1000 BC.

Nothing like that really has taken place recently at the level of the individual soldier. But this may all change. It may be soon that hover packs, jet packs or any number of such tools as also a particular way to use them may make the individual soldier again extremely powerful. In some sense you could say this already happened. One like Neil Ellis, a helicopter man I have posted briefly written about, and who I will cover exclusively in a future show, and who is a great hero, he was able to hold off entire armies single handed in a war helicopter. But such things may soon become possible with personal armor or something similar, and then I believe, should such technology be developed, I think the Leviathan will not long be able to preserve the democratic fiction.

It will not be able any longer, for example, to interfere with the sartorial preferences of the soldier, who will be free once again, who will abandon the workmen-like ugly uniforms of the 20th century and go back to resplendent and magnificent armor. I should one day be dressed in gold and black armor. American soldiers should be made beautiful with broadswords and decorations and plumes. I believe Patton wanted something similar, but again the circumstances of the time favored the workmen-like uniform, and the soldier himself was seen as a replaceable cog. It may be countered yet in the ancient phalanx. So the soldier subsumed himself to the discipline of the unit and that from this in large part

came the special force of that military technology and this is true in some way but that as I say was a later development and I am talking now about the revolutionary consequences of the heavy infantry toolkit when it first appeared. It is wrong in any case to draw too many parallels from the ancient Republican phalanx to our own so-called Republics, or to our own modern military, much though Victor Hansen and others wish it to be so. I covered some of the reasons why in the last show, but in the modern world, again, the equivalent would be rather something like Heinlein's Starship Troopers, where only combat veterans have a political say, and that is called fascism in our day. Inaccurately, but that is what is called. At one point in his book, Thucydides say that the best regime

in Athens was one exclusively formed of this heavy infantry. But again, that would be called a fascist regime today. I remember a Nebish once criticized me for wanting to box, for starting to box. He believed I was bringing back, as he put it, in some kind of cult of the body. Then he called this a fascist tendency. This is fascist to these people. You have to understand how far gone all of these people were even before the current social justice warrior insanity. And this includes the conservatives, the so-called conservatives. Many had internalized Susan Sontag's absurd essay on the Fascist Aesthetic. This essay is a key in many ways to the spirit of the modern liberal state, which in rejecting Nazism in such a hysterical way goes so far as to reject one half of human nature at least.

It's akin to a man trying to cut off half of his face or half his body. But the truth is that you can't edit strength and beauty out of life, and one way or another it will find a path back in. In any case, it may be very well soon that the world depicted in the novel Dune, where the individual soldier is a unit of great force, that this will return and it will have the most far going consequences for political life. Soon we will have indeed Renaissance style returning, grand style, Renaissance men resplendent in jewels, warriors decked out in vermilion and shades of cyan and very esoteric shades of green with feathers and with wolf head or tiger head masks. I see all of this returning.