Total Body Detox
I was going to talk to you about the problem of carrot salad. Do not laugh. This is a major medicinal food with curative powers. But ideally to next segment, because here I call for immediately shutting down all universities and the sudden and urgent arrest of university administrators, the seizure of all university college endowments. This is argument going now since at least 1980s about reforming academia, and there's not going to be any reform. That's been clear since the end of the 1990s. These debates have already been hashed out, and so you have these guys, for example, at Killett magazine online, which is a masturbation journal, because it's really a platform for clueless academics to wring their hands about a battle that's been lost a long time ago.
You know, if you're an academic, I'm sorry if you've invested your lives in that world and now you're faced with this so-called social justice movement and the Red Guard campus mobs, but the fight was lost long ago and many of you, maybe you weren't around then, But you would have acted exactly the same way as your liberal forebears, your classical liberal forebears, who looked the other way when the lives of college men, and in particular the lives of straight white college men, were being made impossible on these universities. And while they were being basically ethnically cleansed from elite schools. And that's a topic in itself that deserves maybe a whole show or its own segment. I may cover it some other time with respect, especially to the numbers, because if you
look at, let's say, the Ivies, and you count the number of straight, non-Jewish, American-born white men who are not legacies and who are not athletes, in other words, the base population of America still, right now, that still runs its economy, that forms the largest part of its tax base, and that built the country and so forth. And I think this is about 3% of the top schools or so. It rises to perhaps more than that in engineering schools like Caltech, but in the others it's about 3% and I'll stand by that statistic. So you can tell me where the rhetoric of white supremacy and privilege comes from. And of course, obviously, it comes from this and from other phenomena like it. and after the fact, justification used by this leviathan and its media organs to cover
up this crime, essentially of ethnically cleansing what is still its most productive population from these institutions, and in fact the academics who are wringing their hands about censorship and academic freedom and supposedly how it is under threat, and they say now it's under threats from both sides, you know, as if they're Raymond Aron or Churchill, they're standing proud against the two forms of totalitarianism. This is how they imagine themselves, except I'm not aware of any area of American or European society where the specter of the fascist right has curtailed any freedoms or even wants to. But this is the conceit of these academics. So in any case, these people at Killett and the other academic hand-wringers never had
a word to say about any of this, so really the other ongoing vile efforts to make the life especially of straight white college men impossible, but which these cowards that I'm talking about, the academics, the classical liberal academics, they can only recast these phenomena in the language of a dead liberalism. For example, the whole debate about appropriation, cultural appropriation, you cannot recast that as a freedom of speech matter like they try to do. Because it's selectively applied by race. And so no one accuses, as is well known, no one accuses a black or a Korean for dressing like a French aristocrat or a medieval knight for Halloween. It's meant specifically to exclude straight white men from traditional campus activities.
In the same way, if you go to these campuses that are really more like children's summer or camps, but there's tremendous hostility to athletes and to frat boys, and that is again because these schools pretty much is the only way you can get in now as an American straight white guys who's not a legacy is to be very good at the sport. So most of the teams for example, the hockey or the football team too, they're mostly white and there is tremendous open hostility that again is not talked about to athletes. In theory, all of these things could be pursued under Title IX or Title VII, under lawsuits, but nobody's willing to fund that, and of course, very few students would be willing to come forward as complainants.
But my point is that these classical liberal academics are totally unprepared and in fact unable to talk about what's going on, and their attempt to reframe it in classical liberal terms of freedom of speech or intellect are completely ineffective and will not protect them, will not protect these professors themselves in the future from a mob either, it will not protect them. So the real reason at the bottom that it's impossible to reform the universities, you know, ultimately the only people who could do that is either the government or the customer base, the students or most specifically the parents who pay the tuition, and they will not do that. And the reasons they won't do that, well, what is a university for today?
They need several things from a university. They need the degree with good chances to get a job after using this degree. Second, they need the possibility to meet mates or someone to marry, spouses. This used to be a bigger concern than it is now when people get married later, but it's still a big deal for parents in why they want their child to to go to college, you know, Charles Murray's argument about assortative mating and so forth. So closely associated with this is the social aspect in general, namely networking and making friends principally for future business and other connections, you know, the networking for which college is actually more valuable than the degree itself. And here of course is counted the advantage of meeting the sons of the influential and
the powerful and the wealthy, and that's the parents and the students. That's from their end their desire, these two main things. Whereas the third benefit you can think from the point of view of the state or of society at large, which is that the hard sciences should continue to be well funded and to produce results. Like I've told you before, the hard sciences to some extent have been themselves devalued at these schools to the point where you have SJW mathematics now and you have second-rate nostril professors teaching the logistics of airport combinatorics under the guise of mathematics and such. But overall, the United States still by far leads in most of the sciences. Even Asia, despite all of the memeing you HBD dorks think, Asia is nowhere near catching
up to the United States in the sciences. Chinese science is still worthless, so you can read the New Yorker article I've linked before about Perelman if you want to see what Chinese so-called science is. But even in Japan, they will worship you if you're a scientist or a mathematician from a leading American university because aside from a few fields like robotics in which they specialize and they're quite good, they're actually quite behind the West. And it's the same in Russia. Russia has very strong mathematics, though, and very strong metallurgy and propulsion. That's something I will talk about another time. They're actually decades ahead of the West in terms of propulsion science. The other exception may be France and some other parts of northwest Europe that come
near the United States in the hard sciences. But anyway, as long as these three requirements I've discussed are met. The parents and the students themselves do not really give a Congolese turd about whether some half-antifa shtetlbili English professor teaches that Shakespeare was secretly a tranny or such things. They don't care that the Sanskrit department or the Greek department teaches that Aristotle was a lesbian. They don't care about that. It has nothing to do with these three main reasons the universities are propped up today. It doesn't enter into it, so people don't care. So that's why the universities will never be reformed the way Killet and others want them to under current conditions.
They just keep getting worse and worse until, I don't know, I suppose if people keep getting ethnically cleansed or openly humiliated for their race on campus, then maybe things will change. But that is to be seen. So given that you cannot reform the schools, I am for shutting them down altogether, completely. You think this is extreme, but in fact it's not. There's really no downside to this at all. Science will move to independent labs, some of them may move offshore to escape regulation, some funded directly by the military or other industries, and meanwhile young people will be able to get jobs. The biggest change that could happen in this regard is if you allowed companies and employers to use intelligence tests again, because that's the reason intelligence tests were designed
in the first place, IQ tests, they predict job performance in a modern economy more than anything else. So the degree, as many of you know, is just a convoluted and inefficient way to signal to an employer these same things, and in fact, because of this, it's the cause of huge loss overall for society. You know, it's also the cause of indoctrination of millions of young white people into spiritual faggotry. So you see how many of the college-educated whites feel the need to buy into the full faggot program of modern society, you know, they go to college parties, drink cheap alcohol out of plastic cup, get tea bagged, it's disgusting way of life, it needs to be completely eliminated, just get rid of the schools.
But just close them down, allow companies to do intelligence tests and open up the economy again to manly action, meaning this regime that exists now of licenses and certifications and credentialism, it actually only helps slores. It's part of the roasty, occupied government, it helps slores and people who are spiritually slores because it depreciates initiative, vigor, it depreciates a raw intelligence in favor of conscientiousness and patience and the willingness to submit yourself to bureaucratic procedure and of course the pride in getting a degree or certification that enters into it too which appeals to the vain and empty character of the average slore. So a society with no great levels of immigration, with small immigration, and without the authoritarian
rule of certification would be one with a much freer economy and would take on the character of youthful vigor and dynamism as opposed to what exists now, which is a closed cartel credential economy. Not directly related to this could be the promotion of homeschooling, the reduction In any case of the school day to four hours a day, there is no reason for students to be in public schools for longer than four or five hours, and the creation, instead of vigorous scouting and nature movements, separate for boys and girls, that would take the place of the modern schooling system. I am for this. And these may sound like radical proposals, but I think actually they are not radical at all. under it and prudent proposals and a nationalist or a populist politician could put such things
forward, assuming he was smart and quick enough to be able to argue and to defend such things in public. Because these things are normal, what I'm describing, they are not extreme. It would bring life back to some measure of normality. What is extreme is the economic arrangement that exists now. If you were to count, for example, the number of make-work and unproductive jobs, and I would say the vast majority of the white-collar economy is fake, in the sense it's a jobs program for shuffling money around and has no economic reality, no productive reality, it only represents a cost, it only represents consumption. For example, the entire human resources industry, how many slurs become H.R. And this only exists because of government regulations and having to comply again with
a roasty centered moral universe that actually smothers modern society and snuffs the life out from under it. And consider the costs of such make-work jobs, just the costs also in illness and suffering from a modern centralized food system that goes with this, where again a fifth or a sixth of the economy is health costs, anti-depressants, obesity-related or otherwise, and ask yourselves how radical is it to propose that government gets rid of this enormous economy of stifling and of suffering, and instead subsidizes young people, for example, to homestead or to homestead of small organic farms, which today with modern technology it wouldn't be backbreaking labor at all, it would even be a pleasure, and it would provide a heartland population of small
farmers that in history are always the civic backbone of any republic, and its military men in particular, that's always the poor population. So sure, you could say the cost of such subsidies might be enormous, if many of these farms for example are not profitable, but you take the same men and the woman that would form the nucleus of such a family farm business, and you consider them today, the subsidies direct and indirect they receive now as an HR shuffler, which is itself an invented job, or as a debt collector, or as a lawyer even in many fields, not to speak of the armies of adjunct professors and all of these that are going red and hungering for blood now. And of course these people are unmarried, alone, they are chubby at the very least, They're coughing craft beer.
So you see where I'm going with these. These are all costs right now, enormous costs. It doesn't matter how you shuffle the money around. I'm not even getting into the so-called black community and the fact that even when they have jobs, they're usually government jobs or this, it's a make work and an indirect form of welfare. But I would add that even in the private industry, most women of whatever race fall into the this same category, that is essentially welfare by other means, you might as well pay them to dig a hole and fill it back up, they will get more exercise that way even. So something like this, what I'm saying, the family funds or whatever, you know, pay them to go to Thailand, this could be proposed by a smart populist politician who would be
prepared to argue for it in the open, but of course this would be the same as revealing that the economy as it exists now, aside from manufacturing and a few other sectors that Trump is thankfully buttressing at last. But otherwise the economy is an illusion. It's a phony economy the way it's been arranged for the last 30 years or more. And I suppose the way Trump and his trade people are doing it to gradually move it back to a productive economy, this gradual method is better without admitting anything in public. But ultimately, you cannot change the character of society in its leftward drift until you break the skulls and put in on Orban, for example, for all their efforts, they will be undone by future generations in Russia or Hungary where the young people right now are paused.
You know, they're into, well, I will have Russian guests on this show in the future to tell you what the Russian young people are into now. quite dispiriting, but in those countries, the same way Reagan was undone by the next generation of Americans, and the only solution I'm telling you is to shut down the schools and immediately arrest most university administrators, arrest psychologists, arrest much of the psychiatric profession, and all university presidents put them on trial for fraud under RICO. Thank you. I must go to break. Lot of people cooking stews, I see now, cassoulet and beef bourguignon. I like very much that you like my rustic gourmet stew recipes. I will tell you in future more about gourmet food. But this show, I want to cover not gourmet food.
I want to cover medicinal and everyday diet foods and some general well-being diet recommendations. And I'm going to tell you manners of a way to detox yourselves. I mean, really, old-school detox, not the Hollywood crazy slut stuff. So you know what a manzer is? You should ask Martin Lindstedt. Ask Yoram Hazony. Go ahead, ask Yoram Hazony what a manzer is, but it basically means you're a misbred. I'm sorry to tell you, you probably have schizophrenia. Most of my viewers have either Asperger's or schizophrenia or obsessive compulsive disorder. You know, it's a result of your parents breathing too late or getting together out of convenience. I believe in love at first sight. Without that, children come out as mamzers, not by the conventions of some dead religion, but mamzers by nature.
You're a bastard, I'm sorry to tell you. So am I, but I know a guy, a real mamzer schizo, who was an office manager, and I met him at a bar. You'd never guess his boring day job by his manner, but he really, he hoisted the schizo flag up high after a couple of drinks and he ended up in a mental asylum eventually because he started to drop hints at first, very subtle hints to his underlings at the office that he was the second coming. I mean he was going to a liquor store or to buy toilet paper and he was harassing the checkout shiboons and the dead-eyed Chiapas migrants with very subtle hints that he was Jesus Christ, okay? That was the funniest part was the illusions, the subtle way he was doing it.
He was saying things like, what do you see here, do you see my hands, do you see something on my palms, and imagining that he was hinting to them he had stigmata and such things. So they don't put you away for that anymore, but it got a little out of hand when he stuck a knife in his wife's throat over this kind of thing. So then they hooked him up to an open plug and they ran a current through his brain and And that didn't help either, okay, see, he's in a bad way now. My guess is his brain was infected, something was eating the brain from the inside, okay, but this is what the mamzer is. You ask Martin Lindstedt, famous white nationalist philosopher, Martin Lindstedt, ask him about the problem of the mamzer. But in any case, let's leave aside the people who full out schizophrenia.
In many other cases, even normal people, you can feel emotionally upset, you can feel anxious and you don't know what the cause is or you have heavy brain fog or fatigue or simply you often have a feeling of illness, bloated or a fever feeling without actually having a fever. You don't know what's wrong with you. Maybe you don't feel bad enough to go to a doctor, but you do go to a doctor, they do tests, they cannot diagnose anything. So you take an ibuprofen, you think you feel better and you know ibuprofen will help anyone but then a little later you actually feel worse. So you know there are two kinds of detox because I would agree in general with the hippies that you've been intoxicated by a dirty and polluted food supply primarily. But there are two kinds of detox.
You see there's a slut detox, the Hollywood Taylor Swift with her serial boyfriends and Madonna slut detox regimen that mostly has to do with Los Angeles type ladies getting jackhammer by just tubes and miles of cock just guzzling cum every weekend so it makes them feel dirty and they need to take stuff to feel better you know actually I sorry to get graphic but semen is a it is a immune suppressant there is an evolutionary reason for that that's very interesting I'll talk about about it some other time. But these slut women from Hollywood, they've designed all these orthomolecular medicine, vegetable matter cures, vegetable cures, which is really a provision of the Linus Pauling cures and the noble tradition of German naturist medicine. So that's why you see the green juice,
Los Angeles slut detox regimens and such, where they juice plants or where they take many plants and the raw kale and other such things and they may juice them and it may be very good for you in some cases but as a whole this method of detoxification has little value it may actually be very harmful. Vegetable matter, I'm not talking about fruit but vegetable matter is poison and in some quantity I think vegetable or plant poisons can help you either through hormesis that That means through small amounts of poison stimulating your system or because they have themselves some of these poisons and antimicrobial effect, but these plant cures are poorly thought out. They have basically a psychological effect.
It's a provision like I say of the noble orthomolecular nutritional medicine that is a mainstay in Europe and has been carried through in traditions, medical traditions in Europe passed down from early in the 20th century which for example the Linus Pauling Vitamin C cures which are effective or the couple of the fasting institutes that still exist in Europe where they make you fast 10 days, even 20 days in some cases. I do not recommend doing this at home. They have these fasting institutes in Europe, one of them in Spain I think, the other one in Germany where they actually monitor you and their doctors trained in this or the whole nudist German late 19th century back to nature living that all of this come out of and I will talk about it later. Some of it may be very effective.
You go to these nutritional German doctor restaurants or stores but you see this is the problem and it's just black and white books of these people are obsessed with sex ores and yoga, okay, they're perverts, but kind of the wholesome old kind of German perverts. They used to be mostly the good kind of pervert. And I'm including in this judgment Wilhelm Reich, which many of you who study the matter, you know him as a Frankfurt School subverter of the West. He's a Jewish psychiatrist who wrote the book The Mass Psychology of Fascism that was actually a very influential among left-wing student protesters and such. But you have to take a step back from political debates and that and realize actually he wasn't that bad and he was prosecuted by Zog.
He was prosecuted by this government because he's teaching that sexual energy could be harnessed and redirected toward other goals, to begin with, for example, health goals, but other things as well. So it's not so simple because whatever his political loyalties may have seemed, you know, Picasso also he was a guy like that the painter on though on the face of things Picasso was a communist But in reality deep down used very reactionary character and Willem Reich was the same okay, which is why all of the anti-fascist Jewish Psychiatrists who came to America the other ones were left alone or they even flourished in academia But he was persecuted and he was jailed for his findings So that whole world out of which these Hollywood slatters in any case
They the detox cured as well as the hippies they come from that the German doctor Turned to nature yoga and the harnessing of sexual energies that original world However is not to be discounted it is to be praised I will do entire show on it in the future and it is to be studied and to begin with if you want to look at the most legitimate part of the heritage, which is the Linus Pauling and his vitamin C cures. I think that's very strong. It's very solid evidence, solid medical evidence for it. It's real. I want to recommend for you in this segment a different and much more powerful way to protect yourself against modern poisons. The one that I've used among other frogs, and do you remember Stud the bodybuilder? He uses this cure also.
This is the real detox, not the fake psychological Hollywood slut detox. This is now the real old school detox I'm about to give you one method, one advice. But you know the bodybuilder stud whose physique, if you remember him, has exceeded the glory that is possible among mankind because like other bodybuilders he had to take quite extreme measures to achieve that superhuman condition and because he had to somewhat poison himself to do that, he had to look for ways to protect himself against the side effects of, let's say, sterons. And I can tell you that he too endorses this remedy I'm about to give. I will bring stud on my show later, but I need to give you because I know you're being poisoned and some of you have asked for advice on what countermeasures you can take.
And one of the most potent is this carrot salad that many have used. as simple as a grated carrot salad, if you prepare it the right way, it can have a profound effect on your health, even with one try, one remedy. But certainly if you use it for a few days or a week, it will have a profound effect on you. And the thing is a carrot, you have to understand like many things that grow on the ground. Just use common sense, a carrot or a tuber of other kinds, it needs to be able to ward of bacteria, fungi, other things that grow in soil and dirt, okay? So the carrot itself therefore has mild germicidal antimicrobial qualities but the way also it's useful besides that is because the particular types of fibers in a carrot are not really digestible by you.
So a carrot actually has no digestible starch. It has disaccharides, that's the form of nutrition in a carrot. It's a form of sugar that are actually good for you. And then it has a kind of fiber that will just tumble through your digestive system without being digested and it will work actually through a mechanical action to detoxify you. It will actually scrape your insides. So this is the Ray Peet carrot salad and you can look it up, look up a Ray Peet carrot salad for all the science behind this, you could say, but I will tell you now the best way to make it. It's one of the only ways and the best way I think you can absorb xenoestrogens and mycotoxin and mycoestrogens and also bacterial endotoxins as well as excess serotonin, all of these
from the intestines and to absorb this satanic brew of modernity from inside you and to expel it. You must grate the carrot, not too finely, but just normally grate on normal. Then you mix in coconut oil. Coconut oil itself has quite strong antimicrobial and in particular antifungal properties and is not just a caprylic acid inside the coconut oil, but other things besides. The coconut itself inside in tropical condition is a tropical fruit, but it's antiseptic at the cellular level. It's an amazing oil. It's actually used to disinfect industrial equipment in the dairy industry. I'm sorry if I repeat myself, but I cannot recommend the virgin, organic, unrefined coconut oil enough. So you mix this into the grated carrot
and then you add salt. Use real salt. Don't use the bleached industrial salt. Use the pink salt or the gray sea salt, unprocessed, which according to repeat it has certain other benefits in your bowels in this arrangement having to do with sparing magnesium and such. So you add salt and you must also add a vinegar, a vinegar of your choice, but most real vinegar is itself mildly germicidal and for this I strongly recommend use apple cider vinegar And you must find the real kind, the real apple cider vinegar, which is with the mother, so-called. It's called with the mother. It has, in other words, the fermentation product inside it. So you see it's cloudy, it has the sediment on the bottom, and BRAG, B-R-A-G-G, is a good brand for this.
So organic, real apple cider vinegar, you can get bottles for maybe around $6, I think. And you can put all of these ingredients together, but the essentials are the carrot, salt, oil, oil, apple cider vinegar, and it turns it into a kind of a nuke for your bowels. And then when you eat, of course you must chew, don't be a spurg and choke on it, but don't finely over chew it. So don't over chew it like a princess because this will actually have an effect mechanically as it tumbles through you. And then in your bowels, it will absorb endotoxin and excess estrogen if you do what I suggest. And I think if you use this once a day for a few days, you will notice considerable changes, considerable change to your overall health, to your vigor and well-being.
And I would say even to your emotional well-being because, you know, as a treatment, this in reducing excess serotonin, it promotes dopamine and serotonin is actually a stressor in this context in your intestines. It has a quite close relationship with estrogen, but if you're feeling quite ill, let's say besides wanting general vigor, if you're feeling sick, if you're feeling especially fatigued or bloated or think you might have been poisoned by a microbe in your intestines that I've talked about, consider grating into this salad also a clove or two of raw garlic. So now keep in mind that Ray Peet who recommends this salad, he does not like raw garlic because he says it's as tough on your intestines as it is on the bugs inside you. But I love it. I love raw garlic.
I love the taste and I love eating it and using it as a form of social aggression on normies walking around on the street and inside stores. But if you really want to practice body fascism to really cleanse out your body of third-world infestations of all kinds. You add the garlic like I tell you to this salad and it will be like platonic eugenic republic body fascism for you. It will cleanse it out. It's important by the way to not have this salad together with other foods. Okay only between meals. This is not a garnish. This is a medicine and you don't take it with other things. Do not take it together even with supplements or medicines because this salad will actually block the absorption of other things. So I should mention here that it's not just carrots, right? White button
mushrooms and also bamboo shoots will have a similar effect to carrots and similar properties. But I think the most accessible form of this total body fascism detox cure, as I like to call it, is the recipe I just gave you, the carrots. And I will be right back. Hi, Pootler. Putler, I said Putler, from, you know, Putin. I will have other food diet shows where I will focus particularly on how to minimize poisoning either through pesticides, other chemical poisoning, or through germs, because, as you know, America has imported the hygiene of the latrines of Chiapas in El Salvador in agriculture industry. So the lettuce you all hear about, you're always warned about, twelve dollar heads of lettuce and supposedly expensive vegetables if you don't allow the big agri-farms their slave labor.
But right now, because of the poor hygiene, the lettuce accounts for 70 percent, or well over half in any case, of the food poisoning cases in America. You buy cheap, you buy now, you buy Chinese, you see, there are always costs. So you understand how much of the modern business model depends on selling you garbage and cutting In some Latino-American countries, for example, the supermarkets, all the local supermarkets have been taken over by the chink diaspora. So how do you think they do this? Is it some innovation in logistics or some wonderful product they import gourmet mandarin duck from Peking or whatever? It's not. It's the way they shut out the competition is it's all cutting costs to the bone. They have their family work there. They pay them nothing.
They sleep in the supermarket at night, they shut off the refrigeration and all such things adulterated products, so the locals cannot compete with that. But I need to tell you this because it's the same at the high end, at the high end of industry and corporations, how much effort, look at how much effort is exerted simply to lower wages in every industry including white color and stem. If only they put that much effort into research and development you think, but you're being sold a fantasy about entrepreneurs who invent a wonderful idea and then they bring it to the market, right? But in fact, it's all repackaging garbage and buying off the FDA and cutting corners and stiffing the American worker, taking away holidays and weekends and taking away organic
food or whatever small residues of a non-serve life that are left to you, whatever residues they have to be all taken away. All carnival get-rich-quick schemes like that Theranos robot girl, you remember her, what she was doing? And she had General Matis, I think, on the board, the mean homo-general Matis on the board. They were faking blood tests, you know, so they were saying they invented a new method and in fact they were just outsourcing the whole thing to normal blood test labs. This is a pyramid scheme, so you know, they can't even blood test, you see. They can't even culture organisms that are already well-known in lab settings. Look it up. The malassezia fungal varieties, for example. This is what causes dandruff, and it's incredibly hard to culture in a lab.
It's almost impossible. You know, it's a well-known organism that they can't culture. It's very thick cell walls, and it's hard to kill, and the dandruff, by the way, is the most visible part of it all, but actually if you have dandruff, that same organism is throwing a wrench inside you and it's messing up various other organs. So this is why men, for example, go bald. They have it appears right now studies that men who go bald have a higher incidence of heart disease because that same organism that makes them go bald attacks the heart. But it's the same with dandruff. And the most effective anti-dandruff is not the shampoos by the way. That can help you and in so far as shampoos are concerned and topical treatments, the tea tree shampoo in particular, it will help you.
Even though the tea tree plant itself, I think it's called melaleuca, it's a little bit estrogenic but it will help you because it kills fungus. That's the only reason. And the best topical treatment is if you can rub coconut oil into your hair overnight and just leave it in overnight. Just don't go outside the next day before washing your hair. You have to remember to wash hair in the morning and be careful in the shower because you will slip on the coconut oil that's running off. But the thing that will actually help you most if you have dandruff is an internal cure, meaning if you take oregano oil capsule once or twice a day on an empty stomach for about a week to two weeks, you will usually get rid of dandruff without any topical treatment.
And this is because dandruff is actually a symptom of internal infestation and the oregano oil will just, the oregano oil genocides all the fungi inside you. It's one of the few things that will also kill toxoplasmosis and quite a few other intracellular organisms that probably aren't even known yet. So oregano oil, it will also give you a clear mind and it's an anti-inflammatory. So this is an herb I strongly recommend you have in your apothecary. Oregano oil, the best brand I found is Gaia, Gaia brands. They make a very strong tincture. It's an Italian company. They have their own farm of herbs. So if you use it for 10 days though, you have to make sure that you also take a probiotic because it's about as strong as a real antibiotic, oregano.
Any smart doctor who knows about it will tell you that, what I'm telling you now, that it's true. But you see all this poisoning, the microbes, like I've said before, this is just the beginning of it all. They dump atrazine and other pesticides into your food supplies. The more the better because it's easier for them. And they don't care. They don't care. This is what happens when you let your food supply get taken over by mega-corps and slave labor where, you know, the age of the average farmer in America, the guys who actually own a farm and who know how to farm, the age of such a farmer is well over 60 years old, I think. So who will grow your food in the future? Okay, who? I don't know, except online.
In online debates or if you listen to radio calling our radio talk show host, everyone Colin is a family farmer or a brokeback, red-blooded rancher or a combat veteran, okay? But in reality, farmers worldwide are very old and farming know-how will die out with many of them in the civilized countries. Younger people generally do not want to get into agriculture because food prices have been kept absurdly low for so long. There's no money in it still. So I ask you what will happen when older farmers have to retire or they die out. Food prices have to rise and they have to rise dramatically or else the economic trends I'm talking about will mean you will not have any food, you will not have anyone to grow your food in the future.
Just slave labor and mega-corps and they don't know the tricks of farming and this is just Jim Rogers' line by the way, it's not my own, but I think he's right actually that agriculture has much upside potential in the future, in other words, food prices have to dramatically go up, there is no other way. I will try to cover in more detail what foods to go for and what foods to avoid if you want to minimize risk of contamination either way, especially chemical contamination. There are actually not so many options in the developed world, but I give you some general pointers now. You can eat organic, in particular organic tubers, organic roots and organic fruits from area that don't use too much atrazine. For example, the upper Midwest is horrible in the amount of atrazine that is used.
But if you can eat mainly tubers, potatoes, sweet potatoes, roots, vegetables and organic fruits, that's good. For your protein, you can use wild-caught seafood, not China, and preferably Pacific Northwest since I've heard that much of the East Coast American waters are polluted at least more than Northwest. But East Coast headache, you have to absolutely avoid so-called wild-caught East Coast headache because you're eating essentially sewer fish basically. But stick to wild caught seafood, shellfish are generally okay wherever they're from. Just again don't eat from China. Eat lamb from Iceland if you can find it. So they're uptight Nordics so they ban atrazine and in general lamb is one of the cleanest meats you can eat.
I should tell you, I would be killed for this, but protein needs are I think overstated on our side. From talking to bodybuilders that I've known, they can even, some of them grow to quite a strong size, a large size, only 100 grams of protein a day only. So it all depends on your physiology, it's something you have to discover. Some people need much more, others less. But like Thomas 77 has said, he told me the biggest guys he knew were the Polish or the Slavic or the black guys, same thing in Chicago, who they have a shit diet of Big Macs and such. From a purely bodybuilding perspective, I mean the diet does not matter as much as people think it does. So of course, they take sterons as well, but even without sterons, a Styrian Neanderthal
caveoid like Schwarzenegger, he would have grown very strong. So I mean it depends what your aims are, okay, but if it's to avoid chemical contamination is what I'm saying here, many animal products are unfortunately tainted because these chemical These pesticides are lipophilic, they stick to the fats. Plants metabolize them out, but animals do not, in fact. So you eat them in the fat, and unfortunately, it's tainted in much of the world now, but I will do a full show on this later. In general, you can get organic ground lamb from somewhere like whole juice for about $8 a pound. You can get organic tubers like Japanese sweet potato and some fruit. This diet can fulfill many dietary needs and this is a low atrazine, low chemical diet.
And like I said, wild caught seafoods and you will notice the foods I'm recommending here are lacking entirely in sauces and in condiments and the like. This is very simple diet. It's a diet based on tubers, etc., limited meats. So to avoid the chemical menace, this diet will furthermore accustom you to a plain and and spartan taste. So why is this important? Because the concept of food reward, now I'm sort of changing topics here, but if you custom yourself to eating a kind of bland diet based on the main ingredients I said, you are less likely to overeat. The concept for this, if you want to read about it, it's explained in a book called The Hungry Brain by Stefan Guenet, G-U-Y-E-N-E-T, there are also debates between him and others
online, and this was recommended to us all by Menaquin on 4, but I recommend this book, The Hungry Brain, because it actually is based on real science and physiology studies, whereas people on the other side don't really understand, when they talk about insulin spikes and so on, it's mythology, they don't understand the way that works, whereas Guionet does, it's not the carbs and it's not the sugars that are causing modern problems. And I know I'll get killed by you carnivores and the keto fags and the paleo fags for saying this, but the people I've known with great physiques and with healthy powers of body, they follow a diet like this. Many athletes, they follow a diet like this. So I myself, I cannot do it. You know, I'm a degenerate.
I love tasty foods too much and I get in such a condition when I do not have tasty elaborate foods that, you know, I will talk to you about this, but sometimes I just don't eat. It's happened to me. I walk on the street between two or three restaurants and I'm so finicky that if I find nothing that's very tasty, I simply won't eat at all that day. I've done this before. It's just fasting by default because my food tastes are so, I could say, snobby, but it's worse than that. I have degenerate, decadent food tastes and I wish I could get myself to eat the Stefan Guinnaise Spartan diet that I've just told you about. But the truth is if I don't have elaborate sushi meals and French meals with complicated wine sauces and the like, I simply will not eat at all.
I will take a couple of bites out of a food and I will basically starve. But don't be like that. I'm telling you just some basic diet advice. First of all, if you want to avoid atrazine, xenoestrogens and also the big chemical dew and other poisonings, follow the foods I recommended. Second, follow the foods in the book by Guillenet for general health because actually it is food reward, so-called, that is the big problem in modern world. It's excess calories and it's not so much avoiding entire food groups as you might think through carnivory or even paleo. And third, I would suggest you supplement the diet I recommended before with some suggestions again from Ray Peet and namely it's to add snacks of dairy and fruit. So they repeat diet overall, if you can look it up.
It would be quite unusual and finicky, even extreme diet that some people undertake. But you can take certain suggestions from him, like the carrot salad I recommended, or what I'm telling you now, that snacks of dairy and fruit, and dairy and being animal turning plant life into protein, that's what dairy, that's what milk is basically. So it's very easy on your digestive system. It's designed for animal consumption by other animals. So of course because dairy is one of the most contaminated products in general, you should only have organic pastured milk or milk derivatives. And even that isn't perfect, but you have to stick to that. If they're fermented like kefir, that's even better. But on this subject, have you ever seen the way free speech conservatives, the conservatives
to say the free speech and the rights of private businesses and private property must be protected, but have you ever seen them complain about the fact that RBSD or recombinant bovine growth hormone, you know, this is used in the dairy industry and it's one of the most disgusting things and there are small dairy producers and medium dairy producers that they pledge not to use it, they pledge not to use this horrible thing, but they're actually forced to declare by the government on their products, they're forced to declare that studies show no significant differences, blah, blah, blah, between R.B.S.D. conventional milk versus the R.B.S.D. free milk, okay, which this is completely false by the way, but the FDA forces them to say this.
As a matter, I think of unfair trade advantage practices, I'm not sure, I'm not a lawyer, I think that's the legal principle. But you know, if you dare to step outside the industrial farming practices and the buy cheap buy now practices and have the burger guzzle or garbage standard industry practices, they come down on you like a hammer. So conventional milk is not milk, it shouldn't be called such by the way. Government that cared about you would label supermarket milk, milk product or actually would ban it altogether, the way Japan bans certain food products like the fish escolaro or whatever. But yes, if you dare to step outside this and right away the government will step in and will force you to write a disclaimer on your product about how it doesn't really matter
and none of the so-called free speech supposedly pro-business conservatives ever complain about this because of course they're not pro-free market, they're simply lickspittles of certain large conglomerates and they in fact have entire think tanks dedicated to attacking small dairy producers that eschew hormones or attacking organic products in general. And they even wanted recently, by the way, to ban organic producers from advertising that they are GMO free, that they don't use genetically modified organisms. So that's right, all the free speech republicans who huff themselves so much on social media, All the cocklings, all their propaganda outfits and think tanks, they all jumped right at the throat of organic farmers and they tried to get laws passed to forbid them from even
advertising that they were GMO-free, it didn't work. So I hope you understand the stakes now, both when it comes to attacking people like me and when it comes to targeting nations that actually still care about their citizens or that don't want their food supply under the control of certain cartels. So Japan, Hungary, Russia, they all banned GMOs, I think, and Bhutan declared it would be the first all-organic society in the world. And I think many of the things we see on the surface, such as Ukraine being targeted and many other such events on the surface that supposedly have to do with principles or conflicts between forms of government or even supposedly with strategy and geopolitics, at bottom I I believe they're about agro bees or other cartels who are seeking an inn because any
food supply that remains free from their reach is to be forbidden, you see. But yes, in any case, I say to the recommendations above, which if you remember are tubers, organic limited proteins from let's say lamb mostly or other ruminants, organic pastures when you can get them, wild-caught seafood and organic fruit. But if you add snacks of dairy and fruit to those basic dietary recommendations I gave, these are things that are for people easily digestible, they have salutary effects on your health, and overall they are free from pesticides and other chemical contamination. And if I add to the point of easy digestibility, fruit in particular, unlike vegetables or other plant matter, they were designed by the plants to be eaten by animals.
You know, in an evolutionary sense, it can be a very healthy food, and sugar in general, rape eat is right about this. Sugar isn't as such a problem. So in any case, this has been a long segment, and it's now time for my own fruit snack, and I'm having sautéed guava, in which I put thyme at the end, the spice, the herb, and I'm eating it with hard parmesan cheese, this delicious snack. And by the way, parmesan cheese, when you get the real kind, and very aged cheeses, Let's say 18 months or two year age cheese, cheddar is like this sometime or Stilton or Gouda especially is especially good for this purpose. These are excellent sources, some of the best sources of vitamin K2 which is a magic vitamin I will discuss some other time on another show.
It has to do with Weston A. Price, principles of nutrition that he found in traditional societies which are rich in this vitamin K2. and organs are also good sources of this. Okay, now time for a fruit snack. I'll be right back. Yes, I switch, I hope, to Spartan diet. I must train myself for this. And in my case, actually, I might profit from carnivory. You know, you have to find what works for you. In my case, as an elimination diet, I may resort to pure carnivory because I am so concerned about mycotoxins from fungi that generally are not to be found in animal matters. So I may switch entirely to a beef diet, I will see. But to talk to you about completely different matter now, the problem of propaganda.
Consider the Twitter account Voice of Europe, which is very large Twitter social media account. I think 200,000 something followers, and it's very commonly retweeted. And all it does, this account, it tweets mostly videos of migrants and browns who are beating up Europeans and raping European women, raping white women, beating up people, doing mobs on the street. And now I see other kinds of good news they're posting, like addiction rates in Sweden or trendy child stuff forced by governments and whatever and so forth. So you might be, if you're new at all this political right-wing thing, you might think this account is your friend. You might think that they're publicizing problems that Western governments want people not to know about, yes?
So then what do you make of the fact that this account is run by the British police? And I don't mean this as one of, let's say, our six degrees of separation conspiracy theories online. entirely established. I've linked to this before. It's completely established that Voice of Europe is run by a woman who works at the British police. She didn't even deny it when the evidence was presented. And it's very strong evidence, by the way. So I say all this because this past week, many of you, including public figures, you shared this video of some chubby kid who was getting beaten up on a school bus by raging shiboons. And I'm here to tell all of you spurgs, that's not how propaganda works, and when a large account like Voice of Europe spreads this kind of thing, that is called demoralization
agitation propaganda, and it's not carried out by your friends. I'm not saying everyone who spreads this is conspiring against you. Many of you and many of the public figures who spread that video are entirely well-intentioned, but they are missing the point. It's a mistake. It has several functions, none of which are good for you. The big hope in sharing things like this is they're hoping to trigger some mentally ill artist into acts of violence based on what they see. So the reality of our world is that acts of violence by so-called right-wing red-pilled whites but often by crazy people, you know, have nothing to do with that, but this will bring down the heavy arm of the state on all of us. So it's very valuable to them if they can ever instigate that, but it goes quite beyond
this too. It's a form of demoralization to our side, to show people getting beaten up and defeated. And this is something that becomes clear when it's broadcast to large audiences. By the way, when some of my friends, they realized this, when they posted the opposite, when they posted videos of white guys successfully defending themselves on the street, beating up the opposition, which I would consider that to be healthy propaganda for our side, But many of the usual suspects who share these gloom and doom defeatist videos, they got very angry at that. They don't want people to see that. In large part also, by the way, they have serious psychological and sexual bizarre defects, let me put it that way.
By guessing they get off on such defeatism, they experience cuck-stration, not frustration, a cuck-stration when somebody like Loki posts videos of white guys beating up minorities or defending themselves, which would actually be good propaganda for our side. But I'm telling you now, a resistant temptation to follow the path of something like Voice of Europe, an outlet of the British police, if you're a small account, it doesn't matter. You can share it with your mother, you can share it with your friends, it doesn't matter. But if you're 2,000 followers or anything above that and you're posting things like this, it takes on a different meaning. You have to understand how propaganda works. And I'm not even talking about so-called, you know, when people say be prudent, if you
have a large following, be responsible. It's a tiresome phrase that people repeat now. I mean something different. I mean it actually takes on an entirely different meaning when scenes of that sort are broadcast to a large audience. It means one thing when you show it to a friend in private. It means something else entirely. It takes a different meaning to a mass effect when you put it in a mass audience. You're not raising awareness. You're not doing that if that's what you think you're doing. You're not getting people on your side, not even the wine moms who are normally moved by this kind of victim stuff. Okay, you're not getting them to sympathize All you're doing is you're making yourself look weak and contemptible, and you're misunderstanding
the purpose of propaganda, which should be to rally and encourage your side. Well, you're wrong if you think this does that. Let me give you two simple examples so you understand what propaganda means historically. Have you heard of Viktor Suvorov? I should have maybe discussed this guy in show on World War II, I think a couple of Let me tell you now, Viktor Suvorov was a Russian general who defected to the West, I think, and he has some books, he was a Soviet general, he has some very well researched history books with strong backing of historical facts and documents of basically revisionist history but the most interesting point being that Stalin was about to invade Europe in the summer of 1941. So now this is a Russian arguing, this is Soviet, and essentially he's saying that
Hitler's attack in 1941, Operation Barbarossa, that it was a justified preemptive strike, and he has produced, I believe, the documents, this guy Suvorov has the documents, the plans for the invasion of Europe that was to take place in the summer or I believe the following year, and I believe drawn up by Zhukov, who was the hero Soviet general of World War II, And at the time he was in Siberia, so it was incidentally the arrival of Siberian troops under Zhukov, by the way, the belated arrival during Stalingrad and after that turned the war to Russia's favor. Don't forget that Russia basically won the war with Germany in World War II, and so as far as the Allies were involved, it was only to mess up Germany's scheduling and its mobilization
for later mega-battles like Kursk, which I think was the largest artillery and tank battle in history still, and of course the Lend-Lease and other economic programs that transferred the American heavy machinery to the Soviet Union going back to the 1930s that also helped. But Russia, I think, killed two out of three German soldiers who died in the war, and of course Russia's losses as well, they were staggering, over 30,000 men lost just in capturing Berlin at the end, just in that one battle. But in any case, this guy Suvorov, he makes the argument that Zhukov and Stalin had already the plans for the invasion of Europe, and he has produced them, I think. And he points out many supporting facts that basically nobody denies, in that, for example,
20,000 plus, I think 21,000 Soviet tanks were on the border of Europe positions that very summer. How do you explain that? You know, battle plans aside, that in itself is pretty strong evidence. Why were they there? And he makes the argument that the reason the Germans were able so easily to overcome Soviet positions is that the Soviet divisions were deployed in attack formation, and they weren't expecting to be themselves attacked. They were caught by surprise. So you can see this from point of view. Hitler's invasion seems justified, if not his methods, right? But the invasion itself seems as a justified preemptive attack. And I myself, I take no position on whether this theory is true or false. So as you know, I'm interested in unusual things.
But I can see this argument going both ways and I don't know enough about it to say. But the reason I'm telling you this theory is because I have a strong suspicion that This theory and the other thing by Suvorov, Suvorov knows on books that they're actually Soviet propaganda, whether they're true or not. So ask yourself, why does the Soviet Union do this? Why do they promote this propaganda? Shouldn't they do the opposite? Shouldn't they present themselves as purely the victims of an unjustified attack? So think about that for a moment when I give you a second, better known example, which Which is that until Eichmann's trial, Israel really didn't talk about the Holocaust, and survivors generally never wanted to talk about it. So why do you think these things are so?
In both cases it's obvious, because making yourself look weak is not a good idea. You don't realize that because you've been told the opposite, and to some extent it seems to be true where you live, because in the cult of victimology in the West and the passive aggressive nature of the regime. But in general, historically, in propaganda, making yourself look weak does not invite even sympathy. It demoralizes your side, it encourages the other side, it gives your enemies ideas. So it may seem quite foreign to you, but makes complete sense to me that the Soviets would not want to present themselves as historical victims in much the same way, for example, The Chinese, who are in fact history's bitches, who are a population of serfs that have been
easily dominated by steppe nomads who are their numerical inferiors, but the Chinese go so far as to claim Genghis Khan who's a Chinese general and such things. And they flipped out the chinks online, the cenophiles, they flipped out, and I pointed out several times that the Manchu, who are these nomad people who conquered China, the They had a system of dual administration, so the Manchu, they saw themselves in bonds of feudal reciprocity with the Tibetans and the Mongols and the Uyghurs, but otherwise they saw the Han as a subject population of serfs, and intermarriage was strictly forbidden with the Han in particular and many such things. They tried to take many measures to protect themselves from being sinified and from being
drawn and absorbed into the Chinese borg, but eventually they too, the Manchu decayed. But now the Chinese, they claim them as their own, because no nation in a normal international situation wants to present itself as weak and pathetic and a victim. This is why when you look to 20th century propaganda in, let's say, communist states, people laughed at it, of course, but no one took it seriously. It's ham-handed, self-congratulatory propaganda about increases in butter production, of the glories of socialist wheat agriculture, and now China continues similar clunky propaganda of this type and tries to push it in Uyghur land and in Tibet, because the purpose of propaganda under normal conditions is to extol yourself and to encourage your own side, and
The Nazis, they had the same thing but slightly better propaganda. It was the same type, it was just made sexier with better art and aesthetics and the like because they actually recruited to themselves, the Nazis, some genuinely avant-garde artists like Leni Riefenstahl and some others like the illustrator known as Zweidus, Hugo Hoppner. But fundamentally the purpose of Nazi art was to buttress their own side, of course, And only a small portion of it was even directed to the demonization of others. So Riefenstahl, the filmmaker in interviews, if you watch with her, she's very proud, for example, that in the triumph of the will, she says she stuck to entirely positive messages and images. And she never showed anything that attacked even other political arrangements.
So the purpose of propaganda in the full sense, as practiced by totalitarian regimes, of course, It's what I tell you, but that was also the case for war propaganda by the democratic states. And it is the purpose also, frankly, in product advertising, in commercial advertising, which is called propaganda. That's actually the name for it in many languages, advertising. And the purpose of advertising is not to make yourself a victim or pathetic. Now, all of this is lost to you, it all seems strange, because of the peculiar character of the passive-aggressive Western regime that seems to worship victimhood, but that's a misunderstanding of what's happening. You cannot appropriate those methods to yourself, I will tell you why.
The modern state is not a victim cult, you know, it's any more than a medieval king who wanted to become, let's say, an absolute king. He was not part of a victim cult when he sided with the people versus the nobility, so that's That's an analogy. I'm not saying it's exactly one-to-one, but if you want, I recommend to you this book by Carl Schmitt, The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. He doesn't really say outright in that book what I tell you now and what many of you know, which is that the modern state in the West, it seeks to expand its power by finding new groups supposedly to liberate but to become its clients and which it is liberating supposedly from a hegemonic and an authoritarian white middle class, right?
That's the conceit of the Leviathan, that the white middle class is hegemonic and actually the modern bureaucratic state tries even to present itself as the underdog or as on the side of the underdog. So despite having greater powers than ever in the West, the central state of these so-called democracies and which is really in the service of plutocrats, I've told you this before but But of course, plutocrats sees a white middle class as their main competitor because its wealth in aggregate is far greater than theirs. It's the largest income source, the largest cash cow in the land. And citizens of the middle class would not also in general as a cultural matter tolerate their depredations. It's used to a high standard of living. It's also the source of possible challengers.
You know, they don't want, the plutocrats for example, they don't want their own often middling sons or daughters to have competition in school and such. But it is these who direct their flunkies in the modern Western state apparatus to extend supposed protections to victim groups, and often entirely new and invented victim groups that can be then used as a battering ram from one side at least against the white middle class, which is their target. So in this way the white middle class can continually be deemed an oppressor and its rights of association and mobilization are progressively deleted. Its rights to arm itself too, that's a very big thing for them. So meanwhile, the central money power gets faithful servants when it does this.
And what I've called, for example, the lesbian mulatta commissars, a small example of this phenomenon. You can see, if you read Paul Johnson's History of the American People, which is quite, it's entertaining book by the way on colonial history and less so after, but if you read this book book, and this is a historian now who's popular with neo-cons and hardly someone like me. He's not popular with people like me, right, or with us, but Paul Johnson in this book, he gives the example of how FDR promoted Jews in the judiciary specifically for this reason, that they would be loyal to him and his increasingly powerful central government and his program, and they could be better relied upon as soldiers against the WASP establishment society at
at the time. This is coming from Paul Johnson, a major mainstream historian, saying this, how this central state gets functionaries that are loyal. That's another benefit of promoting victim groups. And through this constant agitprop propaganda from their side, victimization propaganda on television shows and movies, that far exceeds in insidiousness anything the Nazis or Soviets used. It's far more subtle, it's far more effective. The modern state promotes this passive-aggressive culture that you're so well acquainted with now. But you see, the problem is you think it can be described by victim culture, but in fact it's not. Because you will soon find out that if you present yourself as the victim, you will not get the benefits these other victims do.
In fact, you will have made yourself more vulnerable, more pathetic. You will have demoralized those on your side with nothing to gain. In other words, you continue to live in the old regime propaganda, so to speak, in the Darwinian international world propaganda, where you can't really afford to present yourself as a victim. You will not even get wine mums on your side, like I tell you. And in any case, they can clamor all they want, I mean the wine mums, they are not the ones driving the direction of the modern state. What you will achieve through presenting yourself as a victim is, like I tell you, demoralization and also the marginalization of those on your side who join you in this kind of atmosphere that you create.
In other words, the whole complex of emotions and positions that is described as a blackpilling, those elements that lead to despair, the elements of propaganda that lead to hopelessness on your side, this must all be studiously avoided by us. We don't have the luxury that the modern state does. The effects of black-pilling or despair are terrible because all that will happen on the scale of a mass audience, this will lead people to drop out or to become marginalized, like I said, to encourage some of them to engage in stupid behavior that will get all of us surveilled and of course at the edges, I mean to say, to drive artists to violence. But even aside from that, it will lead to marginalization and to surveillance and to
to powerlessness, and this is why I'm very much against posting videos of that sort. I'm against self-victimization propaganda or despair propaganda of various kinds. So they try to engage you in this kind of nonsense, this kind of political movements based on this nonsense do not work, because it will achieve nothing of what you want, and meanwhile those who are the source of this propaganda will either be rubbing their hands with glee like the Voice of Europe accounts from inside a British police station, or they will be like some of our conservative fools, who are well-meaning but who are fools, for example Ann Coulter and all the lesser versions of her, who will maybe genuinely wring their hands at your oppression, but they'll never actually be able to help you, and their advice
to black pill, to despair, will only get you to be further beaten down by this leviathan. They hate me and others like me for recommending something different. So to all of this, by the way, you can add the personal element to everything I've said so far. Consider the video that's been shared, there's the personal element of it, quite aside from the propaganda element I've mentioned. You know, a boy can take getting beaten up. I was in many fights as a boy. Some you win and some you lose. And I was mobbed on the street one time, by the way, in a very strange way by these kind demonic kids, and I'm talking 40 of them in school uniform, boys and girls, mixed group, well dressed. Okay, they attacked me actually. This was in a highly policed country,
but they attacked me on my way to school. The police stood by. I never understood why. I was seven years old and I believe this is a group of demons that has followed me in other countries over time and taking different forms, taunting me. I saw a girl once who was, she was alone. She was not accompanied by her fellow demons and I was 17 and I followed her on a on a bus on a public bus I followed her across across town just to surveil her but in any case I mean to say that a boy Gets over getting beaten up, you know, it's not such a big deal But it's much harder to get over getting Being turned into a national humiliation news story and this boy's mother this week who put his video up You know, I understand why she did it, but she did him no good. She's made a mockery of him.
And it will be much harder for him to get over this now. So do you understand what I'm telling you in all of this is that honor still exists. And the fact that a nostril, a nignog, or a yid, the fact that such people get off on being made into a weakling and a victim and a laughing stock, that same attitude of passive-aggressive resentment and weakness in which they've been weaponized by the central leviathan that does not help you because the people wielding that weaponized power they have weaponized it specifically against you so you have to pay close attention to form of propaganda use now i must leave the subject of propaganda for a bit and talk other things it may be too long so i will have to leave off discussion of a very interesting subject scouting movements
This must be discussed in full in one or two long segments at least, so I leave for next time, but maybe even a show of its own. But what I've talked about in this show, some of these topics, namely the concern about eating well, a society that leaves off the shackles of modern credentialism and specialization of this kind, an attempt to reclaim some elements of natural life. Toward the end of the 19th century, they developed in Germany something called the Wundervogel movement, the wandering bird, the kind of wandering bird, the Wundervogel movement, which I believe is the foundation for the noblest form of nationalism. And in the end, even something more than nationalism. In the United States, this is very similar to Boy Scouts and Eagle Scouts.
But in fact, in Germany, it had very old heritage. It comes from a deep spiritual well of Teutonic reverence for nature and forest, and also from a long tradition of free travel in the German world. In other words, there was a strong custom in the German world, which was not united politically, but there was a strong custom of hospitality to travelers, also among the ancient Greeks. So it is very common for young people to embark on long travel and young scholars to do the same, and strangers would welcome youth into their homes for a day or two and feed them, and then they could travel again on their long trek this way, whether as pilgrims or on other journeys of discovery. And the ancient Greeks had exactly the same custom, where if you refused hospitality to
a traveler you would be punished by the gods. And the reasons people undertook journeys were not always just purely utilitarian. They were, I wouldn't say pleasure tourism, but they were journeys of spiritual discovery and such. And I think in Teutonic world this privilege was extended to all this privilege of hospitality, but chiefly it was expected that only youth would take advantage of it. And I believe this culture of youthful independence and travel led in part to the establishment of the nature scouting movements of the late 19th century, which otherwise they don't really have a precedent in the pre-modern world, but in my opinion they represent nevertheless the intrusion or the rebirth of the ancient world into the modern, one way this has happened.
And of course they had profound effect on future nationalist movements, including in the United States. It was the way for yours to separate themselves from the oversight of aged society, to experience the majesty of their nation's nature in forests and mountains, to build strong friendships with each other and to learn self-reliance and natural survival skills. And I believe modern states, they tolerated these movements or even encouraged them in some cases because they were in a way preparation for military life. But overall, the relationship with central state authority was not especially good necessarily. So it's very painful to think of what happened to many of these in World War I and later, but there is no reason as such that such movements need to lead to total wars and so on.
And I need to give you a special example, I will offend everyone on all sides with this, but if you look at the Jewish world, which is a feminized and cloistered culture under the rule of their priests, and it was not just the ideology of Zionism that allowed them to reclaim a country, but it was in fact they adopted in full this scouting movement spirit and Zionism was entirely, I would say, an outgrowth of this. I talk about this in the article where I attack Hazoni. By the way, I'm going to put out one or two new articles quite soon about the contemporary political problems we're facing, but in this article where I attack Hazoni, you know, modern Israel is not the creation of religious people or of their priests or even of their ideologues,
but of the fact that for the first time maybe since what Spinoza called the captains of the ancient Hebrew Republic, which are the various warlords in fact of the Bible they had in remote antiquity, but for the first time the Jews adopted a manly way of life and this transformation was entirely because of their embrace of the van der Vogel model, this German scouting movement model. And this is funny. It's to the extent that if you look at photographs of Zionist scouts, they look indistinguishable in their uniforms and manner from the German nationalist scouting movements. And I'm only referring, excuse me, I'm actually not only referring to the Nazis here. You know, there are many other scouting movements.
But you know, it's great fun to throw journalists with this kind of thing because they're never able to tell them apart, the Jewish apart from the non-Jewish scouting movements. It's an open thing, but you control them, and in this context I should add, from this last show or the one before that, that the Zionist right I'm talking about here, they have always blamed the Holocaust on the Jewish left. This is not just an alt-right talking point. The Zionist right always blamed what happened on the German Jewish left. But why do I go on talking on this tangent? Because I want to show you how powerful is the scouting movement, the back-to-nature German idea that it could even transform the urbanized, petty, petty-fogging commercial
culture of the Ashkenazi Jew who lived under the thumb of his Rabbi and his Yenta wife, which was a completely unmanly, dominated life. But it could even transform them to a degree where they managed to regain their nation After 2,000 years, I knew some French Catholics recently, hardcore ones, and they took comfort in this and they told me that if the Jews could wait 2,000 years to regain their state, the French could wait longer than 200 years to welcome the return of their kings. In truth, nothing is impossible to regain from antiquity and the peoples of the West right now, despite all appearances, are actually in a much stronger position in every way, demographically compared to, for example, the Jews of the early 1900s, so a complete
reattainment of vigorous national life is entirely possible within a generation. But quite aside from the inspiring example I just gave, I know many of you dislike Israel, but that doesn't mean its foundation cannot be used as an example. And I think to myself, why not even a Greek-speaking republic in the Himalayas someday, or an authoritarian tropical beach empire. But quite aside from that, it is the German recovery of the spirit of youth and nature in these movements like the Van der Vogel that must be studied by all serious nationalists and to which, like I say, I will devote full show in the future its very important subject. Here it's not so much a question of ideology, it's a question instead of the recapture
of a way of life, or a mindset, if you will, that was undertaken with great consequence at the end of the 19th century, and where mankind, or even the highest portion of mankind, which is the Nordic race, they stood poised to reclaim a form of existence and a social organization that was in keeping with nature, and this was a social and spiritual revolution far beyond what the French Revolution was, and with consequences far beyond what the ideologues of the French Revolution could ever imagine except that this development by a series of historical circumstances it was stopped, okay, so it would be just as if the French Revolution had been sabotaged internally and externally and had stopped let's say in 1800 or 1799 with the defeat of France by outside forces or something like this.
You know, I do not believe in the progress of history or in linear history or such things, You know me, but I do think civilizations have a cycle that they naturally follow. And I think also that once a germ of a certain desire is planted in a population or a civilization, that all the force of the world, all the armies and all the money cannot keep it down forever. So I think, yes, it's possible, it would have been possible to stop something like the French Revolution, let's say, for some decades, but not forever. And in this same way, yes, it was possible to stop the spiritual transformation of Europe that was taking place around 1900 and which the two world wars, it stopped this. But again, I believe not forever because the pressures that the Van der Vogel and scouting
naturism or even you could say the German nudism movement that started around then, the pressures they were responding to, all of this still exists, you know, it's still more than ever, in fact, inherent to modern life. At the very least, by the way, it's a way to select groups, to select their identity and the modern world to preserve it. So for example, this is quite a side point I'm making now, but the French aristocrats that still exist in our day, the remaining noble families of France, which are quite religious, they have huge families, by the way, eight children and such, and they have their own separate societies, their own separate schools, and especially their own separate that's scouting groups, this is how you reinforce a group identity.
And as do, by the way, certain expat European communities, the Anglo-Argentines in Argentina for example, or the Danish who live in certain parts of South America who used to preserve their identity and their racial stock for so long, mostly, well mostly I mean, but it was through these scouting movements. But in general I'm not talking of a utilitarian political move here that you should do this or should do that. I'm actually talking of an inner necessity of modern life which is that human nature and in particular manly nature cannot tolerate indefinitely the strictures imposed by this feminized society no matter how much force is applied. And short of lobotomizing and castrating men, which as we know they are trying to do in
a variety of ways, but short of that, there's no way really to stop forever these transformations that I'm talking about, because the vigor of nature will always want to find an eruption, and in the modern condition, it's the scouting movement and the back-to-nature movement that is the necessary first step in the eruption of this repressed nature that must and will necessarily ultimately triumph populist leaders like Orban and Puckler who would do well to listen to me Trump or the next Trump will surely listen to me but I will elaborate on this later until next time back out