Caribbean rhythm, hottest tropical beats, transmission, reggaeton, revival, salsa rhythms traditional, traditional show from hallow earth, bass, titties, who's in titties, i fuck those hoes hottest live dj show on radio, caribbean rhythm with bronze inch pervert, you dance, you dance now hoe Where is my Afro Latinx whore wife? Why haven't I been gifted an Afro Latinx whore wife yet? All of this internet theme and no e-hores try to only fuck me. I get no groupies like the rest of you. Caribbean rhythm with bronzy pervert, the hottest musics of the Bahamas. Yeah! Okay, cut music now. You know, it reminds me of how men of the East block like me, I read on a blog, an HBD blog, I think, Hartis, they said the Russian men are just higher IQ Negroes.

This in the sense of lacking any impulse control. That's all. Well, for Russia, Africa starts at the Ukraine. That's another saying. I'm sorry to tell you. But I was asked to share with you some of my secrets of street game. Because I heard the white bitch on street now in America, they like to be catcalled. So people were saying on internet that the Anglo man needs to engage in catcalling again. So I am here, I offer you some advice. By the way, show is late and overall will have to be somewhat low energy show today because I get over grievous poisoning attack by Ismaili radicals. That's right, you know about Zog, but you know about Ismaili world government and the The theory is that, for example, all the wars since World War II have been started by the Ismailis.

Look into the Aga Khan, the head of the Ismaili religion, and into how much money and influence they have, into how integrated they are into the British aristocracy and such. Look into that, look into their relationship with Iraq war and with the Mandaean or Marsh Arabs. I am saying too much now. But regarding street game, one of my favorite line is, where you going, princess? Or whatever else, you just make sure you call them princess. It make them feel very special, girl like this, you call princess. And Ovid suggests also you lightly, accidentally brush the back of your hand against a woman breast at stadium. But you might also do it on the street, you say, what is on your dress, and you brush back of your... I don't endorse this.

Be careful, you do this today, it's not ancient Rome, you get in trouble, but a new man who did this successfully, you just have to be Jigga Chad, you have to be, he was, another one I knew was homeless and schizophrenic, he was old schizophrenic, joysy guy, he talked with joysy accent, completely, you know, white beard, he looked like Gandalf the white wizard, and I think he did very well with women, however, I saw him on the street once, and this is Here's another important street game tip. We were walking on bridge and a girl was jogging toward us and her tits were bouncing in sport brow or whatever. As she was coming toward us, he say, she's coming, she's coming, she's coming. He kept saying this louder, better than I do. You get it? Oh my God. No, this guy got punched out once.

Be careful. He was obsessed with Monica Lewinsky and a proposition woman at the place where a chess player congregated. And he used to tell me about the phone numbers. I tell you some other time about how to find patterns in the phone book. Phone book that were still used a few years ago, you know, but he talked about vectors in the direction of titties. He was obsessed with woman titties, like trying to use vector to calculate which way girls' titties would point. He got punched out for it. So anyway, what are some other good street game advice? You see girl on a roller skate, you scream out, hey, roller hoe, roll your ass over here, bitch. Roll your roller ass over here. You see girl with earphone or earbuds and you go up to her and you boldly say, it looks

like we both listen to the musics. We both like the musics. We have this in common. This is way to establish a board. Oh, I kid, you know. You go to the club and you stand by the door. I put this on my account and some authors, you stand by the inside nightclub, you stand by bathroom door, there's usually a line of girls going in and of course as they're coming out and you yell, no sorry, you don't yell, you tell in quiet, perhaps slightly nasal voice, every single one of them you tell, you're beautiful, you're beautiful, you have to use the nasal voice to do it for full effect. I actually saw a dead-eyed half-retard doing this once outside a Brazilian supermarket. It was very effective for sure, I kid, but no, but really, let me tell you what works.

I said this before, and this actually worked. You get a wingman, a wingman, and you stop girls randomly on street, assuming, you know, but you stop them if you catch good vibe, you say, and you have your wingman ask for directions and you let it come out during the talks that you're a Saudi prince and that he's your bodyguard. You speak broken English. It's a cheap way to raise, you know, but it works sometimes. I'm not sure why people are reluctant to do fake identity like this. I frequently told people lies about who I am. Almost nobody who I meet in real life knows my real name. I always give fake name. I always tell people, uh, I casually mention to girls that I was from Monaco sometimes and I would pick a name like Leopold von Westphalen, you know, and even telling girls that you're

a tennis instructor, that's different. It's a way to self-disqualify, but ones that works, I tell them this, but it's my own peculiarity to say I'm a tennis instructor, because I want girls only to like me for my brutal merelyness. I despise any sort of them liking me for intellect. That's always an affectation in a woman when she pretends she like intellect. I believe she will mistreat you if she comes after you for this. But um, so sorry I disagree with the game people on this one issue. And finally, on the street or in bar you may want to tell girls that you're a Greek, you're a Greek man, and that you're in this country because you're pursuing your sister's husband because he murdered her, that you're pursuing your sister's murderer.

This is good way to also use this line at bar, but it should work on street as well. Use with caution, bring up the musics, bring up the musics, now is end of, we meet in Havana, we meet Port Royale, I mean Port-au-Prince, we meet in Haiti, read Graham Greene's hilarious book The Comedians, I recommend it before, very good Brennan, Brennan is here, he's mixing Afro-Cuban music for me this time, Brennan, thank you for the music, go to bed, bring I need more coffees for the show. Slave brain. My gods, are we back? Everybody is trying to take away my health. I've always wanted to find the Mitanni capital of Washukanni. I think that's the key to understanding the origin of the Aryans. Mitanni were Indo-Aryans who took over the Middle East.

Roughly, their height was roughly, I don't know, 1500-1400 BC. Their capital, Vashukane, is somewhere in, let's say, North Iraq around there, is lost. It would make a good project for some billionaire to fund this, like Schliemann, businessman who found Troy, instead of what these billionaires do now, which is waste of time. Did you know that I used to argue with popular HBD writer Gregory Cochran, very cantankerous man, and also with Razib Khun, I mean Razib Khan, who has been blocked, actually, for years. The whole HBD thing is not what you think. It's OK to block me. I don't care. But the reason these people block me isn't because I use naughty words or insult them or because I send too many messages, but because they are, for the most part,

historically ignorant and don't want to be shown up. They do not read history. They don't know history books mostly. They read from blogs. Or when they do pick up history books, they know only in isolation. They read nothing else about their time period. They don't know how it relates to previous time periods. So in this sense, they're very much like any other narrow academic. Many don't know statistics either, and they don't do good work that way, which is necessary when you do genetics of this kind. And so they actually bring discredit on our side because of these things. So I want to mention something, because let's show about cavalry problem, if you remember. The origin of military relevant cavalry, which actually has no history before 1000 BC.

And this ties into much bigger historical matters that few know about, but I tell you now because you've been somewhat misled on this, including by people on our side. I brought up cavalry because the first real wide-scale use of it was the Persians, the Medes. And that's the reason they were able to create the first really huge empire from India to to the Mediterranean, because in the beginning, no one could stand against the cavalry charge. Later on, like I said, they used spikes, and the horses would not charge enough spikes. But that's easy to say. It's hard to do with the psychological aspects alone. So even in medieval times, it took Swiss spike men a long time to perfect their art. Before that, nobody could stand up to the mounted knight in Europe.

So then that brings up the question But how did the Indo-Europeans first spread and expand their languages? Did they not use horseback riding also? And I will call them Aryans because it's 19th century fashion and it's easier than to say Indo-European. And because there's considerable evidence this was the name they used for themselves or one of the names at least. But how did they manage to spread languages over so much of Eurasia so fast? So here many of you are acquainted with recent theories having to do with so-called Yamnaya culture from Bronze Age steps of Russia as supposedly the Yamnaya being the original Aryans and with recent genetic studies and these studies are said by people like Cochrane

to support a supposedly unpopular in his opinion and politically incorrect in his opinion theories about a mass Volker wonder room, or peoples moving and wandering out from the steppe and conquering Europe and India and such. And they were supposed to have done this by horseback warfare. This was the popular conception of it actually for some time, and this was what Cochrane and Harpending were initially pushing along with Razib Kun, I think. In their book, The Ten Thousand Year Explosion, they claim, and being a bit unfair, but they its lactose tolerance that allowed the Aryans to expen so fast. That makes about as much sense as claiming, you know, the Romans spread because they had olive oil or these kind of hyper-materialistic theories, they make no sense.

But they also said, I think in that book, but definitely on their blogs and such, they said that the Indo-Europeans spread with cavalry or with horseback riding of some kind as part of a mass wave of population movements, far back in the Bronze Age, let's say 3000 to 2000 BC. So I think they've revised their timeline since, which is okay, I'm not trying to get them here on technicalities, but they believe they did so primarily with cavalry, which they claim was being used, and here is the thing, they claim that cavalry was being used on the steppes in some form at that time, and which the villagers of Europe, the pre-Aryan villagers they had no defense against this of course they didn't but they claim this and I pointed out to them a few things okay first of all that it

couldn't have been done with cavalry because cavalry wasn't used until about 1000 BC and the evidence it was used before 1000 BC is very slight it's literally a handful of figurines from Mesopotamia and the steppe a handful of things that look like bits, horse bits I mean, but no one can really tell if they're bits. And when I say, by the way, figurines of riders, I mean two or three, not many. And I'm saying this is all based, this theory, on four or five ambiguous samples over a span of thousands of years. Whereas when actually documented cavalry appears, which as I say, after 1900 BC, the archaeological record is full of such evidence, not three or four samples. And as for the Near East, there's no evidence of it whatsoever before 1000 BC or even 900 BC.

So I told them, you know, here you're saying, you know, you're saying cavalry in some form. And I say in some form because in response to my prodding, to be fair to them, they changed their story. They started to say that horses weren't used for actual cavalry, but merely for transport to the battlefield for infantry. But there's no evidence of that either. a made-up cope on their part, a made-up story, and the same reasoning I mentioned here applies in that case as well, because I asked them, tell me how was this powerful military technology known only on the steppes for thousands of years, but never in the Near East? It's rather convenient, no? Because you know, in the Near East you have writing and other kinds of artistic depictions

and greater abundance and such, so there would be more evidence for it, but no, they're saying this very advanced military tech was somehow kept on the steps only, and it was kept there for thousands of years, but unknown in the civilized world, which as I'm saying is impossible. And when they make a claim like this, it shows they don't understand that there were always deep connections and deep communications between the steps and the Near East, through the Caucasus and through other beings as well, but principally through the Caucasus, through the Passives. That was always the case. So that, for example, when we know for a fact that bronze bits and other innovations appeared – and it is true, they did appear on the steppe – but when they appeared, they spread

to the Near East and in fact to much of Eurasia within centuries, because military tech is one of those things that you generally can't just keep to yourself, at least not indefinitely. And then I also asked them, if this immensely powerful military technology or tech tech existed on the steppe, why did the Aryans choose to invade poor Europe and rule poor European villagers? It was just villages at the time, poor villages, and they never tried to make incursions in the Near East where all the money was? Why? Because again, that's awfully convenient that would have been documented in writing of some kind, right? But they have no answer to any of this. Nor can they answer why, for example, if cavalry was used on the

step for so long. And this is really the key thing. Please listen to this. Why then the age of chariot warfare began later? Because the age of chariot warfare began around 1800 BC or so, maybe a bit before. I'm not talking here about the invention of chariots, but chariots for military use. Because chariots are in fact inferior to cavalry. So why would you switch from something better to something worse? And in Aryan languages, you know it's interesting the way linguists try to find the origin of the Aryans because roughly the way they did it you go back and you look at the earliest instances of what words the different Aryan languages share together for example for trees or for wildlife or for domesticated animals and then you cross

check these things they have in common with the ancient ranges of these things if you know them so for example they knew the beach tree the beach Aryan languages share this word for the beech tree, so then they try to look to where the beech trees were present in far antiquity in Eurasia, things like that. You try to triangulate location by finding these things in common, location of original homeland. So by this same reasoning, there are no words at all actually for cavalry riding in Aryan languages, but they are obsessed with horses and they're obsessed with chariots, so that that there are words shared in all of them, for both the whole chariot and also its parts. And there is also the Kikuli text, K-I-K-K-U-L-I, which this was an ancient manual for training

chariot horses, and it's very interesting because the technical words in this manual are in Aryan, Mettani, Aryan Vedic language almost, so I'm greatly simplifying here, but there's plenty of evidence that this was seen in the ancient Middle East already as an Aryan specialty and if you look during this time guess what you see you see sudden and great conquests documented conquests of much larger areas by charioteer elite armies for example the Kassites did this to Mesopotamia and then the Hyksos they did this and the Hyksos who conquered Egypt at this time that's a very telling example because if you look at their leaders names they had both Semitic and Aryan names. So the Hyksos was some kind of Semitic Aryan Manarban

Confederation of adventurers who took over Egypt. So you can deduce from these things It's safe to assume that others saw these examples and they did the same in other parts of the world indeed soon after these we see the conquest of India and also the arrival of the Mycenaeans in Greece about 1600 BC and such things. So if you want to read this theory, I'm actually summarizing for you Robert Drew's book, The Coming of the Greeks, which isn't just about the Greeks, but a very wonderful short book about the Aryan expansions in general. And he has recently, by the way, he has updated his theory in a new book that you can find online where he takes into account many of the recent findings about warfare in the Bronze Age.

And it is true that in the case of Europe proper, temperate Europe, the European peninsula, The settlement may have been somewhat different with more whole-scale replacement of the local population and more direct migration. I will have to see more about this. But anyway, the point you see is that the model of spread of Aryans is one of elite dominance, not migration of widespread migration of peoples with herds and such things. And it consists primarily in small military brotherhoods of adventurers and such who see lands for the taking, lands opened up because of this new military technology of the chariot. And of course this entire program, carried with it probably, almost surely, a cultural and probably a racial element, and I mean it must have, and an ethos of conquest and

vitality and manliness, you look up the Ashvin Twins, which is what I described in my book, and I think you will see I said on last show that many historical peoples who you think where tribes like the Heruli or the Herulis were no such thing, but were instead a gang, basically. So anyway, that's what is the takeaway from what is. Well, first of all is a disagreement on this one particular point, because I believe the Aryans spread by elite dominance, not by migration replacement. And so, therefore, you have to look elsewhere for the genetic signature, not through wide-scale population studies, and not against genetic tests. But you must look, in antiquity as well, at the royal graves, not at the mass of bones that you may have haphazardly collected from some particular time or place

without discriminating between commoner and king. And in fact, this is not always done now. Many of the collection practices are crap. Other data you don't have access to, despite what they say about Mycenae. There have not been any new studies done on the bones in the grave circles. And this is outrageous how things are hidden in this way, for political or ethnic reasons. But there is a rashness also in glomming on to any new genetic study, without judging where the bones are from, without waiting to see what others say, other studies I mean. And this reflects a bigger problem in this field, if you can even call it a field, and it's exemplified above all in what I'm telling you here in bloggers like Razib Kun and Cochrane,

a rashness, a willingness to jump to conclusions accompanied by ignorance because I can tell you they had no idea of any of the basic military history I just sketched out and they got mad at me. And in fact there's this tendency they have also to try to appear edgy. So they thought for example that the story they were telling about herds and tribes moving out on horses from the steppes, they thought this was a really edgy story and that they They claimed they were going against the politically correct academic consensus. And this consensus, according to them, supported instead the spread of Indo-European languages by cultural diffusion, not by migration, out of Anatolia. But it doesn't matter out from where.

Over a period of thousands of years, it was based around studying pottery and linguistics and such rather than genetics. This is what they say, the academic mainstream that they are boldly going against now. And to some extent, I actually agree with them, but again, they show their ignorance because the model they are pushing of migrations of peoples from the steppe was promoted by one Maria Gimbutas, who was a crazy half-feminist Lithuanian scholar, I think, and it was adopted as the dominant model after World War II in distinction to the earlier and in the reaction to the earlier. You know, the earlier so-called Nazi model, which was promoted by German historian, and which was very much the one that I'm talking about on this segment by German historians, the spread of these languages

because of a military elite of charioteers. This was the late 19th century, early 20th century German view and supported by others from other countries too. But I go on this tangent to show you things aren't what you think when you don't know the history, you end up unwittingly promoting just an earlier version of political correctness. And this is, by the way, I never really used the word genocide seriously, look up its provenance, but in any case, some conclusions you can draw from the model of Aryan language spread I mentioned here. First, that genetic studies are good, but you must be very careful to distinguish, I believe, because all ancient peoples were racially stratified, and to some extent modern peoples are too, but when they do the studies on modern peoples,

they are not allowed to collect them by the way different people look, for example, or things like that. And second, I agree with Nietzsche and Gobindau that the mass of Europe is pre-Aryan, it's not Aryan. And that the Aryan race consisted in historical time, for example, of elements from the French nobility and of a few others, watered down for sure. But here's what I'm getting at, I want a eugenic regime in Europe that will seek to recover and to re-breed the original Aryan race, which you have to do very carefully and only carried out by men of taste. I will be right back with a few more words about HBD. So, by the way, when you hear Yanaya culture or something like that in anthropology, a lot of people don't understand that in the Soviet anthropology school of way,

way of thinking about things, a culture like Yanaya culture or Andronovo even or things like this, they do not refer to a culture in the modern sense as you or I would use French culture or German culture or to peoplehood. So there is no implication from a Russian use of word that Yamnaya existed as a people. Yamnaya culture or culture in Soviet meaning of archaeology means a material complex of similar tools, similar physical anthropology. Sometimes just means similar pottery. It does not have, it does not imply peoplehood in this sense. So it's a bit strange, people don't know that. So you get Razib Kun and these people who use these words that are technical and they make confusions Okay, but my disagreement with them

Extends far beyond this one particular matter, you know HBD chick is a blogger She blocked me too. And in this case is because I was being naughty you can say I called her a Dravidian man I called her a South Indian man from Bangalore with hairy forearms hairy fingers And in fact, she's so touchy about this. I don't know, I've heard rumors this is true. I don't know, but I'm... Why am I attacking HBD chick? Normally I don't like to mention anything bad about people on our side. But I'm just not into the whole thing and what she does. That's not history, okay, where you cut and paste long passages from some book you found and... But you know no other books really about the period or the relationship between that time and what comes before and after, so...

Which is not to say I disagree with the specific thing she says when she talks about manorialism in medieval Northwest Europe, as the way that the banning of cousin marriage had long-lasting effects in eliminating planishness and such. But I disagree with her and with other HBD people when they push the pathological altruism line. When they say that Northwest euros or North euros are these pathological altruist essentially wimps is the way they see it. So let me tell you, historically, no one had stereotypes about the English, the Dutch, the Belgians, the Danes, or any of these peoples as altruistic. They were seen as rapacious pirates or warriors and conquerors by much of the rest of the world and also by others in Europe itself.

Do you think the Germans saw the Swedes in the Thirty Years' War as altruistic? Okay, they burned much of Germany savagely. They were seen as accompanied by Sami, lapis demons, on hairy horses, without any regard for others or for outsiders. And it's rather that HBD chick and other HBD people, they confuse conformism, regularity, obedience and lawfulness for altruism, but they're quite different things. If you want a much better study of the spirit of North Europe and of how it differs from the south, you read Nietzsche, it's everywhere in his books, and in particular, for example, you can find the distinction stated very strongly in his aphorism on Genoa from The Gay Science. Let me quote it just for a moment, quoting Nietzsche now, when we consider the north,

one is impressed by the law and the general delight in lawfulness and obedience that is apparent as one contemplates the way the cities are built, one is led to guess at the ways in which people fundamentally regarded themselves as equal and subordinated themselves. That must have been what was dominant in the souls of the builders." So Nietzsche is talking here about the way the cities are laid out. I've mentioned the way cities, for example, in Far East, they throw me in a nihilistic claustrophobia and I've tried to use that to explain Buddhism. But what Nietzsche is describing is different from altruism. It has some commonalities, but it's very different, and that's what I'm really against, the bigger

assumptions of the HPD crowd, who have what I've called a whim-centered or cuckold view of history and of life. And I don't want to insult Steve Saylor, because he's the most important journalist now, and even more than a journalist. He's one of the only places anywhere that you can find new ideas and new material. But in the past, he's toned it down considerably. But in the past he's joined them on this path, on this way of thinking. And especially the guy who goes by the name Peter Frost, he's an HBD thinker who's the biggest cuck of them all. He's obsessed with blacks, okay? So let me say a word about that in a minute. Peter Frost has some complicated theory about sexual selection in regards to hue, to skin color, and that is all made up. There's no evidence. He makes it up.

For example, he has a theory that on the northern latitudes, there was an intense female sexual competition, and that males selected, that males did the sexual selection. But the genetic record does not show this. The genetic record shows something like 90% of females reproduced, but not so for the males. So his theory about female sexual competition and male sexual selection is nonsense. But he designed it because he wanted to promote his cuckold black cock fetish fantasies, okay? Do you want me to put it that way? I don't want to get into it, but read about him and you can think it through. And I had disagreements with him as well on this as on many other things. You know, before this, he and others had a different theory that white skin developed because vitamin D,

the need for vitamin D, which if you think it through, it also doesn't make any sense, okay? I can get into it some other time on that, But I mean, what percentage exactly of lighter skin gives you greater vitamin D absorption at what latitudes? Just think of it through that way. But I'll get into that another time. He doesn't want to go back to Peter Frost's sexual selection theory. He doesn't want to see that women might also select for fairness in skin color, not just men. So of course, his entire mindset is one based on discrediting white men physically or sexually, because he has sissy fantasies. And if you challenge that sissy fantasy of his with any genetic or historical evidence, he gets very angry indeed. So all these people online have bizarre fetishes.

It's a big reason, by the way, they hate my account because I celebrate white male sexual prowess, and it really upsets various kinds of cucks on both the left and the so-called right, including, of course, the fed cats, the Federale Catholics like Doutat, all of whom are pedo-sodomites and cock fetishists. I keep promising you an article about that, I'll get to it, but in the case of HPD, these are people from the tech world, IT nerds, essentially, who want to promote a vision of the white race as deeply introverted, altruistic. I guess it's how they see themselves, although in real life, many of the nerds I've met are some of the nastiest and most selfish people you can know. But basically, these people are dorks, or

Sissified people and they think modern civilization has been built by such dorkery and by such self erasure I talked about this in book They see the shopkeeper or at least the engineer as the foundation of modern civilization and of modern Europe But there is no truth to this. The West is not China Tocqueville talks about this how China in fact was what these people like it was a society These people would favor where thousands of years of testing is what got you ahead It was a meritocracy based on test-taking and exams on IQ. But meanwhile, Europe, aristocratic warrior Chad Europe, easily conquered China. Not the other way around. Civilization or the civilization that I care about was funded by adventurers and knights,

and it was no more sustained by this type of IQ creature, Dorcoloid, the kind of engineer neuter these people have in mind, than it was sustained by cattle. In theory, HPD should just mean that finally there is attention paid to literally human biodiversity, to the importance of genes, of nature in social and political life. But in practice, it comes with a lot of baggage that I'm talking about now and is motivated by this kind of myrdaloid program. And I'm kind of fighting a fight here that is over because these people, Cochrane hasn't written much lately, Peter Frost has stopped writing. But this is my problem with them. When you get into it, they have all kinds of weird neuroses, like Peter Shrost especially, with his series about that men are naturally darker-hued.

If you point out to him, for example, that Egyptian art or Greek art has the men darker because it was seen as a cultural convention, that men were supposed to be tan and outdoors to spend their time hunting, fighting, and at the gym, he got so mad at me when I said that. In his mind, that distinction was only meant to support his cuck-sissy fetish, you see. So you have to think also about how the so-called gay movement started. Not gay movement, but game, G-A-M-E, like what Roush used to be. So I don't mean to attack, in this case, all thinking about womanly nature, or to claim it is all motivated by this. For example, I think artiste is wonderful, and he brought many of us to Twitter. But a lot of this game movement started because of Indian and Chinese tech dorks,

technology dorks, Indian, Chinese, especially Toronto, or in places like this, and they saw that their degrees and their IQ and their well-paying job wasn't getting them anywhere with women in bars, and that an unemployed white chad did very well compared to them. So then you get the Roush forums and a huge portion, maybe well over half of Roush's audience were Indian and Arab and other brown guys who wanted to fuck white women. And they weren't getting anywhere. And then, of course, it isn't just Indian and Chinese guys. Of course, there's the white door colloid equivalent of that as well. And all these people have what is called sad cuck theory, sad cuck fantasies about how women actually only like savage alphas and how they are not that. And they develop these complicated theories

about how women orgasm from rape, Those studies, by the way, when you look into the fine print, they're false because in almost all the studies women orgasm from rape, they're actually being so-called raped by their husbands or boyfriends. So it's not technically rape or if you want to call it rape, it's not stranger rape. It's not what these people have in mind when they talk about that. Because on the other hand, guess what, women, in fact, do not like the Weihan Zhang differential Equation Hot Tea Act, and they never will, and I don't blame women for that. I think the human race would become contemptible if women liked that sort of thing too much. But then the other side of it, which is what I've been trying in part to tell you here,

is you have a lot of white ethnics, for example, in New York. And that's not code, I don't mean just the Jews, but others too. White ethnics, non-WASP whites, non-Anglo whites, New York and similar cities, and these These people just have a civilizational terror of blacks in particular. They had their own communities in the past, the polls, others for self-defense, but not anymore. Especially if you're a white ethnic professional in New York, you live this kind of Eloy life where you're disarmed and a few blocks over you have the black peasants. And they're peasants actually, they're not feral, they're not wild, they're some of the most domesticated people historically, as is well known. They're not feral, as is well called, but they are peasants who, like peasants, do.

They chimp out every so often and they prey on those like you, like the white ethnic, deracinated professional. And it leads in these people to fear and helplessness and to apocalyptic visions of black violence. And that's what motivates a lot of this garbage that I'm talking about. In an indirect way, you see that now with the intercommunity violence, right, in New New York, the news reports where blacks and Jews are fighting again, right? But it's always been that way in the sense that these white ethnics in New York is just this helpless creature who feels preyed upon by blacks. And then they develop as a council against all kinds of weird fears and neuroses. So what these people don't realize is that this is not the American attitude toward blacks historically.

This is maybe the deracinated white ethnic attitude. But the Anglo never felt this way. In the South, you know, the South was destroyed after the Civil War, right? In the Civil War, it was totally flattened and conquered by the Yankees, who then installed a corrupt black occupation government on the South. And in fact, the South had whites outnumbered demographically by blacks for a long time. But what happened is these whites easily subdued the blacks. Because blacks, like women, are a political nullity. And under normal conditions they are completely vulnerable and controllable. It's only under the situation of degenerated mass democracy where blacks become a social and political tool. But even here they're used by others, so what I'm telling you, it's not like I'm celebrating

blacks here, but in the scheme of things they're a nullity, Africa is a big zero. All of this side of things is easily controlled and has been in the past many times, including by Arabs. I'm saying is that this excessive focus on this one particular thing is a hysterical reaction by a deracinated white ethnic professionals and by IT dorks who don't understand American history and do not understand their own situation right now. So above all, I tell you that I reject, completely reject any supposed alliance with China or Or the Orient, on the basis of some kind of IQ nationalism construct, or the idea of IQ-based civilization. IQ is not a political concept. This is not a civilization worth having, by the way, the one these people have in mind.

Civilization cannot mean the domestication and therefore the end of man. And within an American context, the danger, far more than blacks. You know my friend Allegheny, a poster, he's gone now. I don't know. He was one of the funniest writers I've ever met. I wish Allegheny, if you're listening, I wish you'd come back. But he said these white nationalist hysterics are retards. They get bothered by some football player with a blonde girlfriend or whatever, when the far greater danger to America are the so-called nice high IQ model minorities. The Indians, the Chinese, and other similar far greater danger than the blacks and even the third-world masses that we all elected Trump to get rid of to stop their inflow,

but the model minorities are far worse, which is why Trump's latest words about H-1B visas are very worrying. On the other hand, I should say that rhetoric is one thing, action another, and Trump has greatly reduced the number of H-1B. So we'll see what happens. But overall, in closing this segment, I must tell you again to avoid not the intellectual content of so-called HBD, Much of it is very useful and I agree with it 100%, but the particular program of the people pushing it, who do not understand politics and who have a hysterical vision of their own situation in life, which they share with parts of the game community, so-called, P-U-A, whatever, with a study of human biology cannot be carried out exclusively through the fears of the uprooted white ethnic professional and nerdaloid.

It cannot become synonymous with the cuck mindset. Be right back. The cuck mindset of the Chinese or the deracinated white ethnic professional dork must be completely rejected. The blacks are nature's peasants. In some ways they self-bread themselves to a state of subjection such that even other kinds of Africans like I've said before who encountered them, the Tutsis, easily subdue them. They are a farming and peasant people. If you want to see wild people, you can go to Central Asia. You can look at the Tuvans, or the ancient Manchu, or some of the Mongols, or so forth. Or as I keep telling you, many Europeans. Which is why it's absurd for somebody like Peter Frost, or Cochrane, or these people to keep promoting this insane line about, oh, the poor, dorky, Finnish engineer who

who needs their protection from feral blacks, in their opinion, to sustain civilization. Therefore, must make an alliance with the Chinese Communist Party. And all these people are shills for China, one way or another. But enough of this. Enough of this. I want to talk to you in this last segment of show about the so-called Red-Brown Scare alliance. The Red-Brown Alliance scare is nonsense, you see. You see the people pushing this. It's a catchphrase among some journalists, but it's also unfortunately used by people on our side, so-called on the alt-right or whatever you want to call it, America First Nationalism, who think they are being edgy or interesting by pushing some kind of rapprochement with socialism.

And a lot of people like Saurabh Amari, the Indian, another model minority telling you what America means, who used to be a Trotskyite activist on campus, I found out recently, by his own admission, and in that particular sphere, that all dripped down from Dowsack and that part of the CIA, by the way, and they've been obsessed with pushing this also for a long time, this so-called, oh, my fellow far-right wingers, are you not interested in socialism? You know, I get DMs from some of them, don't you want to talk about Baudrillard, don't you want to talk about Yochi, Yochi was not a socialist, but basically they're always trying to push us into directions that they're familiar with, and to meme us into these things. So why do they do this?

My thing is, okay, I don't like to be manipulated, you understand? I don't like to be manipulated. If I have friends who liked, for example, the Joker movie or who liked Yang before that, I disagreed with them but I shrugged it off, friends disagree. But when I see obvious astroturf campaigns with dozens of fake accounts, with pre-made avatars and pre-made memes that are centrally distributed by people who don't exhibit any graphic design skills the rest of the year, I say, okay, fuck off. I don't want to be, I don't want to turn this part of Twitter into a place for your gay marketing schemes. It's one of the last corners of the world where there's any free thought left. I've said this before, so it is the same here. Do I have leftist friends? I have leftist

strength, delicious tacos. I don't think he's socialist, but he's a leftist. And there are some others. Amy Therese is nice to us. I think she's a tanky, old-style Marxist, whatever. But you know, part of being a nationalist is rejecting ideology in general. I've posted clips of Jabotinsky before, the Jewish Zionist. He doesn't talk ideology and principles. He sucks, how much water can you get from the Jordan River? How many barrels of water do you have? And this kind of thing. These are the things that concern me. The only ism you should maybe invoke one way or another is nationalism. But the nationalist is interested in solving particular problems as they come up for his people, not in ideology, not in theoretical tinkering, and certainly not in narcissistic self-branding.

I am this or that. a third position or whatever third position. You know Perón was not a red-brown alliance. Perón was a general who saved his country from communism and he went some direction into adopting some communist policies which weren't really communist but he had to do it to save Argentina from a communist takeover that would have been completely murderous in Argentina's case. If you know anything about the way the communists still are there They would have murdered millions of people and Perón stopped that and I don't agree with what Perón did in terms of his economic policies because he arguably ruined Argentina but it was going to be ruined much worse by the commies and

That's in general the nature of what third position or red-brown alliance means in the past. It's not what these people mean Oh, yes, the two extremes get together and shake hands It's usually someone like Perón trying to go some direction in that way to stop a communist takeover. But it's not even applicable today, and a lot of this is what these face fags, even on our side, are pushing. A lot of them are ex-theater kids, okay? They're the theater kid, the gay theater kid, narcissist. There's nothing there, and they're easily manipulable. And the manipulation does not come from any of the faces you see, see, but from those who are prompting, the ones prompting and pushing them and feeding them lines. And it takes place the following way.

They take a part of the truth, which is that indeed many of the ideas we promote do sound at times compatible with leftism in a way. Immigration restriction for wage growth is arguably a leftist and even a Marxist position, which is why Sanders, right, he was promoting it recently. We are for ending wars, of course, so this anti-hawkishness is... But by the way, only as a matter of weird historical circumstance, but it's considered the leftist position now to be anti-war, which is something else that Trump ran on, and that's very important to nationalists in the United States now. And then the third plank that he ran on, which is re-industrialization, that can go either way, but it's something that should be very attractive to the working class, to the upper Midwest, to the unions.

So that's arguably another leftist position, you can say. And on top of that, there are many like me who have no power or influence in political life whatsoever, but we promote other ideas that sound very leftist. I'm a thoroughgoing conservationist. I care deeply about animal, and I'm very much for reining in the agribus and the agri-chemical and chemical industries and many other such things, and for universal healthcare for workers, for trust-busting. And by the way, when I say universal healthcare for workers, it was that important add-on that middle class and working people should have good health care free of charge in some way. And of course preventive care, primarily by securing a healthy food supply, that's another

whole story I've talked about before, but I'm also for debt jubilee of all kinds, debt forgiveness of all kinds, and many people I know believe in similar things, so you see there's some truth in theory here, including then also the fact that many people who voted for Obama both times, became supporters of Trump, and indeed almost all of Frog Twitter that I know, I think almost all of them, voted for Obama at least once, except me. I didn't vote at all before Trump. So anyway, let's say you are, I don't want to say a spook, okay? Because if I say a spook, then these people will exaggerate what I'm saying to make me look crazy. But if you were a never Trump or GOP establishment consultant operative, operator, wheeler, dealer,

smear merchant in DC, and you saw this, that some of these positions sounded the same as the left. What would you do? Think about it. What would you do if one of your strategies would be to promote this whole scare of the red-brown alliance meme, and to resurrect ideas of third position and stressorism and such, to make it look like it's the 1930s all over again, and to hope that narcissists on the national side would take this bait and that they would identify this way and to feel edgy try to shake hands with the tankies and the socialists and so on and of course you'd mix all of this in with a heavy dose of antagonism toward the Ned Flanders type of red state conservative who we've called coxervative at times in the past

and you would encourage such people to denounce these red state conservatives as boomers So then, this leftist meme originally from Reddit, OK Boomer, it becomes popular. Now you must realize, I'm not saying that the people on our side promoting this crap are badly intentioned even, or are aware of any of this, they're just reckless. They're low IQ, many of them, and not all, because at times your eye may have said similar things, but if your entire worldview veers in that direction, you must understand that you're being manipulated. This is being promoted to tear apart the Trump coalition and to destroy his chances for 2020 Which is all that the never Trump people are focused on right now, and I'm sorry whatever you think of Trump I don't like to be manipulated

That's what I mean by I there is no time right now to cobble a third party with this side of nationalism Plus elements from the left like some of you may think and the only effect of such a break right now now should even be possible at all would be that someone like Hillary wins in 2020 and then after in 2024 it'll take you a decade to form this realigned third party. The only method for realignment is to grow the GOP from within by winning back the Reagan Democrats and some others. Look at what's happening to Virginia and California right now. You do not have time for that. worse is not better. You learn this crap about worse is better from learning, but worse is only better if you're sure you'll win, otherwise it's worse. This Red

Brown Alliance scarecrap is being pushed by a number of factions, none of who have your best interest in mind. On the one hand, it's also the counter-terrorism so-called experts, the journalists who are constantly buzzing in that direction hoping for federal funding, the leftists and anti-far security studies researchers who are getting funding for their NGOs, often from government, to monitor this supposed threat, which doesn't really exist, so they have to go to some lens to create it or even to astroturf it. Then you have the GOP Never Trumpers I just mentioned who are doing the gay ops through smear machines, so-called think tanks like the Capitol Research Center, and idiots like Baked Alaska who used to be a journalist for BuzzFeed, I think.

And the purpose of such people is to make Trump supporters, or at least this online right, the frog right, the alt-right, or whatever you want to call it, to make it repulsive and toxic to red state Americans. And to make nationalists look reckless, demented and stupid. And they promote various contradictory haphazard tactics to achieve this, many ineffective. But one of them is to get you to fag off about your supposed rapprochement with socialism. It gives you an edgy intellectual feel, doesn't it, to think that, right? And to be hostile to boomers. And the only effect of all this will be to turn off red state America to nationalism and to reject you completely. Whereas, let me tell you, I don't need to say this, I shouldn't have to. You read my book, maybe.

There's no stronger stand against gerontocracy or the rule of the old and the sclerotic than my book. You know this. aware of the problems of the boomers and of their smell and disgust. On the other hand, many boomers and near-boomers are very good at political organization. They did the Tea Party, Brexit, the Yellow Vests in France, and that's all done through boomer Facebook and similar methods. And us, the so-called youth, were very unable to do anything like this or to get our people even to run, let alone, and of course they had many candidates elected in the Tea Party. Now I know So the Tea Party was co-opted and silenced and intimidated through the IRS, which is a communist tactic that Obama did that he never had to pay for. It's outrageous.

But their candidates, of course, also did not do what they promised. But that led these same people to support Trump. And in general, in any case, they've showed far more ability to achieve things politically or to shake things politically than any of the so-called youth, okay? So the bigger problem is that the red-brown scare thing is a fake construct. In other words, the similarity of policies I mentioned doesn't mean there's any real common vision of life or common loyalty above all. So in the end, the boomer, for all his delusions, he doesn't hate you, he doesn't want to kill you. While many of the people who call themselves socialists, communists, or similar things they very much do, they would kill you if they could. And the fundamental issue for those people is immigration.

No borders, no genders, which the socialists, so-called, they will never agree with you on. Whereas the boomers, they actually do agree with you on this, and they would support even an immigration moratorium of sorts if you phrased it right. Even the argument, by the way, over legal versus illegal immigration, you know, I know why does it matter, right? If it's legal or illegal, it's equally bad. But that's not the end of it, because once you say immigrants have to be legal, that means there needs to be a national discussion and agreement on what kinds of immigrants should come, in what way, how many, and that's actually a very strong way to limit or even end immigration. So you should not dismiss the political utility of the boomers in this regard.

Furthermore, many of them, not all, obviously many are idiot delusional, completely delusional, Many of them are shit-lips, but quite a few of them on the MAGA train people are 100 percent on our side. And I know this because of the chat rooms, the private communications with MAGA moms and others who have – they have publicly a totally pro-Trump or even Q orientation, but in private they agree with us, so do not be so rash when it comes to them. The boomers have many problems, but there's not going to be a third party. The realignment, again I'm telling you, will never take place that way. The realignment is taking place by winning the portion of the Reagan Democrats and others from the upper Midwest working class that are winnable.

And that's not through idiotic embrace of socialism or any other ideologies. The hardcore leftists, you will never win to your side. They want to build a trendy Iran concentration camp for you and beat you over the head with a black dildo. And you know, the boomers, I have to tell you, there's another element to all this. You know, remember Paddock, right? Remember Stephen Paddock? Well, what was Paddock? They don't want to say this, but Hakan had his number. Hakan knew. Paddock is a radical boomer, terrorism. That's what Paddock is? Unbelievable. He just chimped out in the name of boomerism and wasted. I can't say anything more here, but if the 2020s are bringing a time of trouble, All these Q people that you laugh at now, they're all going to completely chimp out!

They're going to go on a rampage, and I want to be on their side when they do! You can't compete with the power of the boomer! The radical boomer chimp out! They will save America as much as the soccer hooligans will save England! Boris Johnson, at the head of thousand strong manor booms of soccer hooligans, cleaning out the Midlands! Stephen Miller, at the head of boomer divisions! because this is my vision for the future of England and of DC. Anyway, back out!