Welcome, Caribbean rhythm, episode 25, Bronze Age Pervert. It's almost dawn here where I am. I have everything ready, I took nap earlier and I have everything ready for you here. Coffee with a lot of sugar. I'm sorry, I follow repeat style when it come to coffee. I believe a little bit of sugar help body deal with stress, physiological stress. But so, I see recently they won't take public any company with board that has only straight white men. Goldman Sachs says this news came out, I think, a week or two ago. So it's interesting that the mask is now off. I think they are moving too early. But really, how do you know that someone not lie about being gay? This came to everyone mind, I think, as soon as I heard. How do you know? I mean, is Tim Cook really gay? How would you know?

This question now come up a lot about booty gig, or butt jeej. But I think Mr. Peter Butt Joke is a homo. I discuss why I think this on episode 5 before, but, uh, how you know Tim Cook isn't lying about it or someone on a board in the future, how will Goldman Sachs know if they lie? They say, okay, I'm gay. How they know this? Will they demand proof? But even then it's funny to think about they demand proof you suck cock in public you show photograph, but you know What if they do release a photograph of themselves as a rent boy or the Tranny Lord or whatever? And then even in the most compromising positions, they say oh look, here's a photo. I am gay. What is that considered gay? What if that's fake too is done for money? What if they're faking that? I mean, it's possible gay for pay

exists just like look at Hollywood all the main actors that people respect got their role by sucking a Weinstein type cock the lavender social network has a stranglehold on casting so does that make Shia LaBeouf or Denzel Washington or Robert DeNegro because I think some of the older ones like Robert DeNegro or any of these self-righteous performing monkeys does it make them gay It's possible that it does it's possible that those casting couch Experiences do make them gay who knows but then I think we require a national Conversation about what is a definition of gay? I don't know in Brazil is not considered gay to gangbang a tranny I don't know, you know, this is not family show be careful So but it reminds me of a related problem. This is related problem

So just as preface, I understand a no-fault divorce exists now and it makes what I'm about to tell you somewhat obsolete. But not entirely, because I think when you want to annul a marriage, when you seek a marriage annulment, I think that is still different from a divorce, I'm not sure. And it's still possible that legally in some states for an annulment, you still need to provide cause. And as you all know, one of the classic grounds for an annulment is that a marriage has not been consummated. So I'm not sure if this is still a legal doctrine in the United States anywhere, or possibly however it still is in some other West European countries, and it certainly is in the Catholic Church. So you can see where I'm going with this.

What will happen if you have a gay marriage and they ask an annulment, they seek annulment on this ground. I mean, what constitutes consummation of a gay marriage according to state law or to Catholic doctrine? Catholic Church doesn't allow gay marriage. Yes, I suppose so. But just wait. Andrew Sullivan may very well soon get his fantasy marriage. He has a fantasy he marry his boyfriend in a church, in a Catholic church with Pope Faggot sanctifying the Union And with the Cathar Bugger, Bouncer, Bergoglio as Pope, he may soon get his wish. But let's say they then seek an annulment, what's in? Or if this is still legal doctrine in any state, I don't know. Your Honor, he didn't let me bugger him hard enough. I went in only halfway.

You know, I think they need very detailed rules and specifications on this, on what counts and what doesn't. A whole body of common law, Anglo-Saxon common law, and of Catholic canon law on what constitutes a lawful consummation of gay merit. Your Honor, he didn't quite bugger me hard enough, he spilled his seed, oh God, can you imagine where all of this would go? Why not? But I think it's an appropriate end to the dignity of the legal tradition. Get a federalist society interns to write hair-splitting pieces on this. It can't happen soon enough. Please, fisted by Foucault, does fisting count as a consummation of a gay marriage? Your honor, he refused to let me fist him, so I seek a moment. Yes, granted, he denied you your human rights to a fisting. You know they do this, right?

You think it's a joke, but there's a whole body of feminist thought, feminist critical song that pushes for international law, lull, whereby a husband will be in breach of international law if he doesn't service his wife at her pleasure. We're really not far from Aristophanes' Assemblywomen, famous play where the women take over city and the old hags demand that the young men service them first. It's very funny, famous episode, western literature. I see a frog posted it this week in tweet. It's very funny. I've talked about it many times. Aristophanes understood where the end state of Marxism, the final paradise at end of history for Marxism, where it necessarily leads. Who cares about a material plenty if it doesn't bring you sexual fulfillment? In the materialist scheme of things,

that's where the real fight inevitably leads. That's why Wellebeck says that now war enters, special the international global war enters a special phase where men fight for the pussies of each other's nation oh my god this is why butt joke if he really should be faking his gayness and I don't think he is because I can smell that type of BTK personality you know BTK is look at a bind torture kill that type of personality from far away I can smell it but I think if he is faking the gay, then he miscalculated because the white gay is already heated by the orc masses in intersectional theory, so-called. The white gay is seen already as an oppressor, as the white man, as whitey. I've linked to this article before about some fat binar who whines that white gays are the

1% of the sexual grinder world, the 1%. He says they restrict access to sex. Of course he means sex with them. He says he deserves it despite being obese and paused. And he says that by denying, this is gay journalists now writing that by denying access to their bodies to others they're engaging in violence and exclusionary supremacism. So now you see sucking cock won't save you from getting politically and economically fisted by the Globo-Homo elite, whose ideology is, how should I put this, the ideology of the Globo-Homo elite is use state power to sodomize the many. This was for a while my coinage, use state power to sodomize the many, but it's already been appropriated by Lloyd Blankfein and Ben Rhodes, they are the real Nazi gay supremacists,

I'm sorry, not me, but, you know, they took over the whole Nazi gay thing. But you know, it's really remarkable they should come out with this plan so openly. I speak of Goldman Sachs saying this, no white men allowed on boards of companies. It's remarkable they should say this in open now. It could be one of the characteristic vices of such group, that they never really understand their powerlessness. But, you know, just the goal of it is to say we want to lower the number of straight white men on boards of companies, eliminate our ethnic competitors, in other words, from the elite. What? And the dumb cow-like white American for now just takes it. It's as if in India or Pakistan or crapistan where they have these ethnic

groups at each other's throats for hundreds of years, right, and they're competing for resources and one says, okay, we're going to start removing you from universities because we've temporarily captured the state. So we will remove you from universities and important companies, but we're going to do it under the cover of a universal language of human rights and liberation of oppressed minorities. I think your average Gujarati or Punjabi would be able to see through that, right? But in America this kind of ethnic competition is hidden under layers of triple-speak. And the average office American is susceptible to office speak. It's kind of flower language. So either it's that or the tyranny of it all is so much more forceful than the defenders of liberalism dare to admit.

So of course the truth of it in the end, which most of you probably accept, is that in America It really is not just ethnic competition, it's not that simple. But it's rather that fractious minorities, among who, by the way, the subcontinental Brahmin females from the outhouses of Calcutta, they're the most obnoxious, right? But among these, you get these fractious minorities that are pushed as peons of some very sinister powers that pretend to rule, but that hide, they're pushed to break hegemony of the white middle class because they're good servants once they get promoted. So I think this is why the state loves the gays, the so-called, that's why you get the Nazi gay like Ben Rhodes and the Trannies too, you know, they're faithful lickspittles

and the CIA promotes them too, promotes the eunuch. I guess that's what this episode of Caribbeanism is about, in a way, because when you look at these people like Ben Rhodes and John Brennan and Farkas or Vindman, is Vindman your classic eunuch? I don't know. Whatever other orcholoids get promoted to the deep state, at least the visible functionaries, I'm saying, they're all communists. And by that I mean they're anti-Western. They wish to see the end of Western civilization and it's a replacement by as a not They don't know what they want. Okay, they don't know they want simply to replace it except their hidden Masters only no, but they're faithful front functionaries and flunkies They do at least they do what they're told on this show

I want to begin at least to tell you that this was always so is not something new that came with As Obama or Bush II or even Bush I or Clinton, the dancing clown, it's always been this way. And except for a few patriotic factions and holdouts, the American deep state has always been communist and has always fought worldwide against Western civilization, always, including during the Cold War, when it frequently sided with the Soviets. That's right, a deep state, sided with the Soviets and worse, against Western European white civilization. It's hard truth, difficult truth for some to accept. And I only began to tell you on last show about my core, the mercenary hero. But I wanted to leave the details for this next installment today.

Finally, in closing introduction segment, I want to thank my many subscribers. Without giving numbers, I don't want to give precise numbers away in public, but I must thank my subscribers for your support and tell you that what you do is you give me complete freedom and independence from anyone else. I need to rely on nothing and no one else anymore but my audience. And I know from me you expect the truth. As I see it, I will not always please you. I'm not here to pander. You know, I will always be to say as a hidden and forgotten truths There's only a few such left online and on a radio Me a few others and I wanted to sink the surge in subscribers I am honored very good, but I go to break now to tell you a story I continue from last time in Congo Africa Congo after

Decolonization which was a huge mistake it happened in in 1960 and Congo was not ready for it, pretty much none of Africa was. I think right now Botswana doing okay, Rwanda doing okay after Tutsi reconquest, but in general none of Africa was and still is not ready for decolonization. Obviously not. Who can say that Congo or Rhodesia was improved under black rule? Many blacks today, they want the whites to return. Apparently, they know white supremacy is good for them. But given that it was decolonized, Congo, and the Belgians left, the evil Belgians, yes, evil. The way that a well-known New York Times book about King Leopold has it, you'd think the Belgians were living demons. They introduced evil into the world. So I have no doubt that Leopold was a rapacious king

and wanted to extract resources. But I don't know if that is any worse than any other African warlord before or after. The Left has always been spiritually shallow. You see, they always think there's some type of immediate political solution. The Left has always believed, since days of Hegel and even Kant, that material arrangements and material improvement would ease men's suffering in some fundamental way, I mean, would change men's fallen state in the world. I would rather quote Schopenhauer on this. He says better than I do. Let me quote Schopenhauer. He puts it best when he say, I'm quoting Schopenhauer now. The state is essentially a mere institution for protecting all from the external attacks and individuals from attacks within its borders.

It follows from this that the necessity of the state rests ultimately on the acknowledged injustice and unfairness of the human race. In the absence of injustice, no one would think of a state, for none would need to fear any encroachment of his rights, and a mere union against the attacks of wild animals or the elements would bear only a feeble resemblance to the state. From this point of view, we clearly see the narrow-mindedness and shallowness of the philosophers who in pompous phrases represent the state as the highest purpose and the flower of human existence and thus furnishes apotheosis of philistinism. But never has this false delusion been made more mendaciously and impudently than by the demigods of the jestzeit," these are the Hegelians he means, they think that if only

governments did their duty there would be heaven on earth, in other words that all could gorge, guzzle, propagate, and die without effort and anxiety, for this is the paraphrase of their end in itself. This is the goal of the endless progress of mankind, which they are never tired of proclaiming in pompous phrases. End quote from Schopenhauer, isn't this wonderful, he attacks the fagged Hegelians. He make fun of leftist Hegelian with this, of the Hegelians, but thereby also of Marxists before their time and of the entire modern left. The problem of shallowness of left, it believes solution is material prosperity, and in particular if you just have right combination of laws and the right state, that men's fallen existence will be made better.

The hyper-modern left, what you call the woke left, the intersectional people, they abandoned this vision only on the surface. So they say, for example, that the white man, and they say white identity, although in practice they always mean white blood, they say this is the cause of man's fallenness. They don't use those words. And while they do not mostly seek to eradicate white people, they seek to turn them into cash cows and to parasitize off of them indefinitely. They use this kind of language to guilt trip them to accept this. But like I say, this is only an apparent deviation from old paths of the left. Because implicit in the state as the great mother provider, the elimination of all intermediary institutions and identities is a necessity.

And the most important of these identities, that stands as a roadblock to the universal tyranny, is the identity of the Western man, or of the white race, or of white civilization, which the modern ideology of the left seeks to do away with just as much however as it would like to do away with the Japanese in Japan or the Koreans in Korea. It's nothing personal, okay, so of course the imaginings of the foot soldier or leftist schmuck are one thing, but the reality of the hidden rulers is another, so that what looks like the universal and equal state of plenty dreamed of by the left is from the the other point of view a global slave state, the features of which have already come well into view with barracks of communal living, locusts, protein rations, insect eating and so forth.

But the ideology of the left has never abandoned this Hegelian hope that Schopenhauer spits on which is that some material change or circumstance can always be effective, that will always be the key out of the kingdom of darkness that is man's existence. Yes, out of millions existence. I had to catch breath, they tried to do something to me. But of course, if you look to Africa before the white man, I want to read for you something else. Here is a pleasant passage from a famous anthropologist, so to speak, George Frazier, a white Sioux charming, the life before the white man in Africa. Let me read this to you from George Frazier, I'm quoting him now. A West African queen used to sacrifice a man and woman in the month of March.

They were killed with spades and hoes and their bodies buried in the middle of a field which had just been tilled at Lagos in Guinea. It was the custom annually to impale a young girl alive soon after the spring equinox in order to secure a good crops. Along with her were sacrificed sheep and goats, which, with yams, heads of maize and plantains, were hung on stakes on each side of her. The victims were bred up for the purpose in the King Sarai, and their minds had been so powerfully wrought upon by the fetish men that they were cheerfully they went to their fate." He says the magicians Delusionized them, you know, so a similar sacrifice used to be annually offered at Benin in Guinea the Marimos a Bechwana tribe

Sacrifice a human being for the crops. The victim chosen is generally a short stout men he is seized by violence or Intoxicated and taken to the fields where he is killed amongst the wheat to serve as seed. So they say, after his blood has coagulated in the sun, it is burned along with the frontal bone, the flesh attached to it, and the brain. The ashes are then scattered over the ground to fertilize it. The rest of the body is eaten." End quote. That's George Frazier, just an amazing display of charming African culture. Before the white man brought his blue-eyed devil trickery to the world and the funny part of all this is that both the liberal and the leftist so-called political thinkers are wrong I mean this pleasant enduring reality of the human longhouse that I just read for

you and as I called it in my book it existed both before Aryan supremacy but is also what comes after human civilization will return to it is what human civilization will return to in the end, because it is in fact the default state of civilization as such. China and India being just giant Africa, as you know, you've been misled. And this eternal night of subjection is what will come after Aryan supremacy as well, should that ever come to pass. Yes, you see, in the liberal Hegelian, Rawlsian, yes, it's the same thing I will explain to you some other time. But for Rawls, the natural excellences of some men are evils bequeathed by nature which mankind is supposed to make up for somehow. So you see, in the leftist

scheme of things, if you're naturally superior, you're therefore inferior. The state needs to take action against you. They are quite open about this. That's what their civilization And I believe it is just the atavism of their ancient pre-Aryan blood sticking through them and through these Newfangled supposedly newfangled ideologies, which are actually very old But if Aryan supremacy should ever come to an end Human civilization will return to this morass of the longhouse that it began in Because this is the essence of civilization as such, but where was I? Where was I? I promised you I would talk about the Cold War and the perfidy of the communist Hegelian deep state But I carried away on paths in forests. Next segment, I come back to talk about the Congo and North Africa

That's right. That's right. What lies at the end of history is not a state of language plenty but the beginning of history prehistory the matriarchy and suffocating death. So if you remember from last show, I talked this man Moise Tshombe, who was of a southern Congo tribal royal line and became a pro-western leader in that area, Katanga, southern Congo. And so, like so many pro-western leaders in the third world, he was targeted by the American deep state for elimination to be replaced by an anti-western leader. First of all, everyone formed over Lumumba, the first prime minister of Congo when it declared independence from Belgium, even though Lumumba was installed basically by the Soviets. But everyone in the West formed over him.

Then Tshonda came in, I don't want to give you a story all over again, but he twice tried to preserve Western interests in Congo, white interests. in the revolt of the Katanga province that he tried to declare independence, and then when he returned in 1964 as prime minister of all Congo, 1964-65, which is when he invited Mike Hoare and Bob Denard and other swashbuckling white mercenaries to essentially save that country because it needed to be saved from one of the worst communist rebellions in history of the savage, cannibal symbols, and Tshombe managed to stop this and to save thousands of white missionaries and others in Stanleyville and elsewhere, and also saved many Congolese, of course, by use of white mercenaries and their military prowess in science.

Something that was immediately condemned, by the way, by the whole of the international community and so-called free press, even at the time, who reviled these men like whore, That in an age where three peoples had sovereignty over their own nations, these would have been celebrated as heroes. And then, however, Tschombe was once again exiled. Mobutu came in a coup, became leader of the Congo, and declared Tschombe a traitor and exiled him. So Tschombe had to leave once again. And the place he chose for exile was Franco's Spain, a reactionary Spain run by Generalissimo Franco, which was a refuge during this time for Western men who were patriots to the West and who were targeted by international socialism.

So this man, Tshombe, he takes refuge and Franco is Spain, and this is roughly where I left off in last show. What happened, how he was killed, is very unusual. It was 1967, a few years later, Tshombe is in Spain, and a French gangster named Baudinon, was actually working for French intelligence agency, he lured Shombe on a plane that was then hijacked and then was taken to Algiers, Algeria. Shombe had a few months before this, he had been sentenced to death by Mobutu in absentia. Mobutu being now leader of the Congo and by the way, Mobutu was not the pro-Western anti-communist leader, you've been told. but rather he was an unpleasant anti-Western nationalist, anti-white nationalist that America thought he was a better man to use to run the Congo than Tshombe, who was the actual

pro-Western choice. But in any case, Tshombe gets kidnapped, hijacked on this airplane, he gets taken to Algiers by this French gangster Baudinand, and then briefly looking into the affair, the Western press and intelligence agencies, they just shut it down, they just shut down all looking into this. Why? Because it is found out, Baudinand, the French gangster, the kidnapper, he got paid bigly in Liechtenstein, a transaction that involved an American CIA agent in the Congo. Yes, an American CIA agent, intermediary. American officials were recorded saying that the United States had 500 million dollars, which at the time was enormous, some, invested in the Congo under Mobutu and it needed to protect this investment. And finally, this is a really interesting thing.

Please see what I tell you here. It was reported in the British press that Bodhanan was working with an American named Davidson in Paris. Now who could this have been? It could have been one well-known Alfred E. Davidson, who was the head of a branch of American law firm in Paris, who taught political science, whatever that is, at American College in Paris. And he organized, he was the organizer of the Paris American Artists and Writers for Johnson in 1964 for Lyndon Baines Johnson presidential campaign in 1964. Artists and Writers for Johnson in France. So the organizer of this, he is recorded also having been a one-time reject of the State Department on account of the communist record of his father. So you see, this is the man who Bodinane, the

French gangster-kidnapper of Tshombe, is said by the British press to have been working with in Paris. And two years later, in 1969, Algeria murdered Tshombe in prison. So it was basically an assassination with some delay so they could say, oh, he died in prison. But the really interesting part of all this, and yes, I have this from a certain source, but I don't want to tell you who it is. You know, it's not my original research, I rely on someone. But the interesting thing is, you know, this middleman, Davidson, just like some innocuous Democrat lawyer, this kind of pro-Johnson Democrat lawyer, the kind of fixture you see a communist family who tried to work in the State Department and was apparently rejected for these associations.

But in fact he ends up being the middle man to a French assassin, part of an assassination carried out by the United States and Western intelligence agencies to offer a pro-white leader. In this case he was black, but it often works that way. And for what? because large monopolies had already had a relationship with Mobutu, the leader of Congo. So where else do you see this? Well, it's everywhere, you know, this pattern of dubious people with socialist backgrounds, Soviet connections, who work with Western deep state agencies to promote interests of mega monopolies. Consider Angola, the show in Angola, you know, a Caribbean Rhythms episode two, the full show is still up on SoundCloud and YouTube, but in Angola what happened, Angola and Mozambique

were parts of the Portuguese empire, just like Congo was parts of the Belgian, except in the case of the Portuguese, they had been there since the 1500s, and they were quite well integrated, before the foundation of America in the 1600s. But it was a very unusual relationship by the 20th century for Portugal with her empire, Actually, Portugal sent its own poor abroad to get good jobs in Angola and Mozambique. If you're a poor man in Lisbon, you know, they sent you abroad to Mozambique. You got good jobs there. Even if you're a waiter, you got paid very well. So it's a bit the opposite of what you'd expect from the story of what imperial power does, which is to import cheap labor or to exploit colonies for resources. It can work the other way around too.

You offload your extra unemployed population of the colonies. So what happened in these African countries was America started off essentially the anti-colonial movements. Oh yes, it was America, it was not the Soviets. In the case of Angola, you have the American Committee on Africa, the board of which included Eleanor Roosevelt, Adlai Stevenson, and other such luminaries, yes. They started Union of the Angola People in Leopoldville, they started Voice of Angola radio station, and the CIA started the Union of Angola Workers together with the American labor movement, the AFL-CIO, more on this in a moment. But all of these are American-made to destroy essentially an American ally, Portugal. also started the terrorist communist anti-colonial movement in Mozambique, a very brutal communist

guerrilla movement called FRELIMO. This is a little known fact, but obvious if you look into it. The guy who started this FRELIMO guerrilla communist movement that broke Mozambique away from the Portuguese empire, the guy who started it, who was it? He was born in Portuguese East Africa, but he ended up being an academic. His name is Eduardo Mondlane, he ended up in the United States as a youth or as a child, and he was a student in America, and then he was an anthropology professor at Syracuse University among others. So yes, look it up, an American professor, he gets sent back to Mozambique, he starts That's FRELIMO, Communist Terrorist Guerrilla Movement, anti-Portuguese, anti-white, so-called liberation, but actually terrorist movement.

And he was funded by the Mozambique Institute, which was in turn funded by the Ford Foundation, which you know is CIA. So yes, very nice, CIA power, thank you, world communist power. I have more. I have, oh, I can spend entire season of shows just on things like this. I have more to tell you. very special you want to hear? Do you want you want to hear a little bit now about Algeria? I tell you more next time. So okay, so Algeria was where Tshombe was taken to be murdered. But how did that happen? So it's very interesting. Algeria as you know was part of France, not just of French Empire, but of France itself. And its people had French citizenship. I talk of this on the first show, on pilot show of Caribbeanism. So in fact, however, there's plenty of evidence that Algerians

wanted no part of independence from France. And I don't mean just the French, ethnically French Algerians, I mean the Arabs too. They did not want so-called independence from France. They wanted no part of the FLN, or the Liberation Movement, which was in fact funded by the It's a totally Soviet creation, but I should actually say a Soviet, Washington, D.C. creation. Because as in the case of Vietnam and the other African examples I gave you, the push for decolonization, which is to say Soviet recolonization, this came from Moscow and Moscow friends in D.C. as well. Ah, yes. Communist labor leaders, Jay Lovestone, Irving Brown. These are people with names. They are known. Irving Brown, American labor leaders working with International Confederation of Free Trade

Unions, ICFTU, and the UN's International Labor Organization. They were financing and leading an entirely astroturfed so-called independence movement in Algeria. These are the people who made it. In reality, it became later a Soviet Islamic terrorist movement. these men, the labor leaders from America who promoted it, funded it, astroturfed it together with the CIA, they considered it and understood it as a socialist revolution against whitey. Anyway, I must take a break. Be right back. The John Birch Society was right about everything, you know. You know, Trump's father was part of John Birch Society, I hear. Very interesting. A whole carnival of vicious deformed war supported by the commie pinko-american deep state

establishment going back decades and John Birch society uncovered them they knew about and by the way you know William F Buckley he attacked the birchers not because they were anti-semitic but because they were anti-war this is something else well-known William F Buckley is a well-known the known homosexual but here is another example the guy who was to lead Tunisia whose name was Bourguiba, forgive if I don't pronounce right. I'm a Russia peasant, I don't know. It's B-O-U-R-G-U-I-B-A. Long-running leader of Tunisia, how did he come to power? He was entirely supported by the CIA, the AFL-CIO, the labor movement, the so-called free press in in America, which is why they gave him completely a free pass when in 1961 he had his rival Sala Ben Youssef assassinated in Frankfurt.

And this was a case that was indisputable at the time because Bourguiba's own secretary was easily traced and implicated in this assassination, but nothing. Another major political assassination of the 1960s got no press whatsoever in the West because Bourguiba, leader of Tunisia, was Irving Brown, Labour leader Cammy Pinko's man in North Africa, so-called nationalist. So in truth Bourguiba was not a nationalist of how you or I understand it, he was a kind of anti-Western nationalists that came to power in the wake of a decolonization, as I say, often with considerable American helps. And it may be said at the very least that this American meddling was highly imprudent or rather imbecile because it ended up elevating anti-American leaders to power.

And with all these so-called Western, I'm sorry, third world liberation leaders like Murgiba or Lumumba or the other losers like Nyerere or so forth, they're all astroturf. Not one came to power or led these independence movements because of grassroots nationalist support or by their own talents. Any talents that they had were to network with Soviet and American communists. That's it. It was all supported from abroad. Not one of these independence movements happened because of true nationalist uprising. And in every case, anti-American leaders, anti-Western leaders were elevated. You see recent examples of the same. I don't need to tell you, blood money wasted in Iraq and Afghanistan, they still end up anti-American. How this happens?

Stupidity, lack of foresight, whatever you want, if you want the innocent explanation. But the case of Algeria is much worse in this way, because did you know there was already a major pan-Islamic militant organization, Jamaat-ul-Islam, the Army of Islam, in other words, operating in California in the 1960s in San Francisco? Big, well-funded public organization. How did it come about? Well, there was a man named Ahmed Kamal. It sounds so exotic. Well, Ahmed was actually born Cimarron Hathaway. That's right, cue Steve Saylor and Haven Monaghan. But yes, this was Ahmed's birth name, Cimarron Hathaway. And I think he was born in Denver. He did have Turkish ancestry, but you know, he found himself in the United States, born in the United States, and later he changed his name to Ahmed,

and he believed in a worldwide caliphate and devoted his life to this. that's already in 1960s, actually even before. He was captured during World War II, I think, I believe among the Uyghurs, trying to rile them up. What a surprise. And then Ahmed, what is, Ahmed something, Kaleb, whatever. He really came into his own, however, not with Uyghurs, but later when America decided to support Algeria and Tunisia and all these wonderful new countries to gain their independence from the evil European French. So huge, just huge amounts of American dollars were transferred to Algerian terrorists in Switzerland. Oil companies, oil company executives were shaken up, intimidated, made to prove their Pan-Arabist, pro-Arab devotion. And Ahmed Kamal was at the center of this,

together with the Algerian lobbyist at the UN. They convinced Jewish leaders and the Jewish press, as well, to stump for them and to fund them. They promised the Jewish press and Jewish leaders that an Algeria liberated from France would support Israel and the Jews, when in fact, as is well known and as could be clearly expected by anyone, the very opposite happened. Algeria joined the holy war against Israel, so to speak. Please tell this to Hazoni. Yoram Hazoni may have forgotten this little history lesson. Tunisia declaring under Bourguiba, and I'm paraphrasing to Bourguiba here, we will have to become just as anti-Semitic as Cairo to lessen the growing power of the Jewish community in our country. That is, end quote, what a surprise, amazing, amazing.

Bourguiba supported by Jewish labor movement in America and the Jewish press didn't quite work out. Decolonization didn't work out as expected. These plucky third world socialist leaders supported to the hilt by the Jewish press and Jewish labor organizers ended up being much more anti-Semitic and problematic than colonial France. And of course, you know, France actually armed Israel for the 1967 war. So this is all very strange. The new states, these new third-world states, they didn't end up being either pro-American or pro-Jewish. They were Soviet satellites, anti-Western. And de Gaulle was also, by the way, a huge moron and a traitor. And he went along with the Washington-Moscow decolonization plan. But I will cover de Gaulle and his treachery another time.

You know, it's very interesting how this happened. the CIA, the labor movement, the press, all in on Algeria. And the CIA accepted Ahmed Kamal, the Islamist from Denver. The CIA, communist CIA, accepted him as their authority on all matters Arab, thereby setting off the worldwide Islamist movement that Mark Stein has called a far more successful globalization story than McDonald's. And you see it all here in its beginning, the creation of the CIA and the international socialist left. In November 1960, about 50 dirty, filthy professors from so-called elite American universities wrote in support of Algerian terrorists who were trying to tear Algeria away from France and from European civilization. They called on the French army to desert and to refuse orders and all of this same thing

that leftist professors do today that they've always done. But this was interesting because it was at a time when some publications in the West, even major ones, could at least notice what was going on, which is why the following event of this declaration by professors, a major Paris newspaper said it would have been more prudent for Israel to restrain its intellectuals, rather than to let them run amok and to become champions of Algerian terrorist organizations. That of course would very clearly and without doubt soon take Algeria as they did. It would bring Islamism and it would bring inevitably an anti-Israel and anti-Jewish orientation. I don't know how, I don't know about this. Tell Hazoni, please, tell him about this, because he seems not to understand that supporting

anti-colonialism isn't historically exactly good for Israel. But this attitude, this anti-colonial attitude was actually widespread in American establishment at large, among commie wasps, the wasp idiot dinosaurs, the commie wasp, the pink wasp by the dozens in the CIA and the State Department, working with Moscow to decolonize the world from the evil European influence. And of course it ended up biting them too, of course, but that's what I'm saying here. Of course, you know, Sirhan Sirhan, he assassinated Bobby Kennedy, this famous episode. How was Bobby Kennedy assassinated? Bobby Kennedy was going around before this, I think 1968, for the campaign. He was wearing a Yarmulke, and he said he would defend Israel no matter what, so he gets assassinated by this Palestinian Jordanian.

It's very strange. The Kennedys, they both spent their political lives pushing precisely for what I'm telling you in this episode. Do not be fooled by, oh, JFK was a base nationalist, he was a dirty, filthy pinko, apologies, that's all he was. And by the way, there were no missiles removed from Cuba, that's what I hear. It is all for show that the missiles stayed in Cuba. But every chance the Kennedys got, they attacked civilization, they attacked European colonies. They worked with the Soviets and whoever they could, not only to decolonize, but to promote a rhetoric and a sentiment of revolt against the West, of colored third world revolution. The Kennedys, that's right, Irish power, and in the end they were both assassinated.

Bobby Kennedy, in this case he was assassinated, I don't like this word ironically, but it's very strange, he was assassinated by the same kind of young third world lunatic that he He and his brother had weaponized against whites in the colonies. So you see the same thing as with Israel and free Algeria. Free Islamicized, Sovietized Algeria. Be careful what you work for. You will harvest a barren sea like Osama bin Laden used to say. He used to say this. The imbecile and craven character of all this, the resentment, if you want to call it, of European civilization. How did this work out? How did it work out? The thing is it never stops. The same process of assault on civilization is ongoing. What is going on here? So what is going on?

I think there are two innocent, more or less innocent explanations for all this. So one explanation for why this happened is America was facing off the Soviets. So if you're facing off the Soviets, you can see some big brains in the State Department in the CIA, they thought, okay, we need to counter the Soviets who are trying to take up the cause of freedom of the peoples and decolonization and who are calling the Europeans fascists and imperialists. So we can't very well support Euro-colonialism and racism and so on. These are not my words, you know, but theirs. So they may have said we need to support our own anti-colonial movement so that, for example, the Vets or the Angolans won't say America is evil and imperialist like the Europeans.

So when the Vietnamese or the Angolans become independent, they will become pro-American and not Soviet. And to this end they may have even said, you know, socialism seems popular in such and such countries, so yes, let's support this kind of a non-Soviet socialism and that kind of international non-Soviet socialist leftist, by the way, what the Obama family came out of Obama's mother fits this description very well. This is exactly what she was, an internationalist socialist left, CIA controlled. Steve Saylor, among others, has documented this quite well. So this is the innocent explanation, more or less, that because of Cold War politics, America had to support politicians that were anti-European and even socialist.

And you see a variety of this thinking in Graham Green Book as a quiet American. And it's also not a bad movie, by the way. I don't know. I don't think this explanation works. Because many examples I gave you here and many more I will give you in future episodes, this explanation doesn't make sense. Because in many of these countries, the population either supported the colonial power, the people, They liked the colonialists, or they supported local, loved leaders like the Shondes, who were pro-Western. But the United States, which is to say the State Department, you know, not the people of the United States, but State Department and so forth and CIA, they went out of their way to seek out local leaders who were anti-Western, who were bloody socialists, who actually did

not have a base of support. And it proceeded to elevate these with money and weapons. And then again, the State Department, the CIA, the labor unions, they went out of their way to destroy the popular pro-Western leaders. This happened especially in Algeria case, which was a totally astroturfed liberation independence movement by America and the Soviet Union. It's very obvious there, but also in Congo and many other places, I tell you later, okay, so that doesn't work. But okay, there's another innocent explanation, if you forget that for a moment. Which is that America, you know, had itself an anti-colonial foundation, right? It gained its independence as a republic from England. So right, even into the 19th century, Ludwig talks about this.

Americans were going to ports, American sailors, they were going to ports, they were causing a lot of problems for the Brits, just going to ports in Asia and in the Pacific and telling the locals, you know, what the hell are you doing? You can just overthrow the British. You can become free. Look, we did that too. You can become like us. And England never retaliated against this because starting in the late 19th century, England realized how important it was to keep America on its side. So it tolerated this. But that's the reasoning that America saw itself as a nation of freedom with an anti-colonial message and heritage. And then closely related to this is, you could say, a real politic argument, you know, that

America supported these anti-European liberation movements, so-called, because it would displace Europe and take power for itself. It would displace, for example, France and Algeria because it wanted France and the rest of Europe to be weaker, only so that it itself would become stronger and assert worldwide hegemony. Well, that is fine innocent explanation except it wasn't the Americans, it was the Soviets who won in Algeria, and in most of these cases actually that I've mentioned, so how did that work out? I don't know. But even if the intention is pure and innocent and good for America, the consequences were as you see, it's cretinous stuff, it's cretinous, it doesn't work, and in those cases where America did get concessions for mining or oil like in Congo or Angola I need to

say what you know it's not really America's at one but a few financial cartels because the average American son they saw none of those profits right instead he paid for the guerrillas through his tax dollars then he paid for the mining or extraction equipment and training again with tax dollars and then paid again for the gas at the gas station so it's just like now you pay three times you get nothing you get shafted and a cartel and some banker skimmed the cream off the top just like with the rape of Ukraine in last few years you tell me if America saw any benefit or if it's rather the gangsters I sometimes call a new world order I don't know more on this next time but But you can see even if intention was pure and real politic for America, power, so forth, it didn't work.

It was the Soviets and these other gangsters. If anyone got the benefit, it was them. But I myself am fond of another not innocent theory. You know, Heidegger said that Moscow and Washington were metaphysically equivalent. That's right. Heidegger said this. Moscow and Washington were the same and if that's so, I don't see why they weren't also physically the same, in the sense that their effects on the world were, as you see in this show, working together, even when they seem to want to work to opposite ends, because the same cabal of Peter Strokes and John Brennan goblin orcs at the heart of both Washington and Moscow, Isengard, I saw the movie, I don't know. If parrots can say some basic words, why can't cats? I asked this before and if cats, why not frogs? I don't know.

More on this some other time. Thank you very much.