Yes, Caribbean region episode 26 with Bronze Age perverts, so Bloomsburg, Bloomsburg is now running for president and is getting more attention as he drops bags of cash. More attention from corporate media. You're starting to see the crazy headlines again. February 14, 2020, I see headline, will election be a contest between democracy and Putinism? Well, what does this mean, you think, Putinism? Did you know that Russia did not see any revenue from its enormous oil reserves until about 2004, I think? It's called often a gas station, not a country, by jingoistic ideologues. Well, if it's a gas station, it saw no revenue from its gas and oil until about 2004. How did it live before then? I don't know. Not one rumour went to the Russians, and I'm not saying Putin or his junta did not see

a profit, but nothing went to Russia. Everything went to multinational oil conglomerates. Isn't that interesting? The excuse was they were developing Russia's capability of extracting oil and the oil rigs and such, but in fact the Russians saw no profit. So you see, that's democracy. When your nation gets looted and every penny is squeezed dry by foreign cartels and the free press wants you to know they will definitely back democracy in this election in 2020 in the United States. And they will call Putinism, well they will call Putinism what Putin actually did, which is to reassert national control over vital assets and to have the people of the nation start to see some, you know, some of the benefits and profits from citizenship. And that's unacceptable, it's not who you are.

Democracy is when the Clintons start poor, but end up being worth over $200 million after serving only in public life. That is democracy. And that $200 million, by the way, that's worse than it seems, because that's worse than money directly stolen. The Clintons did not directly steal that money like they might in African nations. It was worse. They were bequeathed that money for their services in laundering much larger amounts to the so-called establishment, to the occupational imposter class of both parties. So here comes Blushberg to the rescue. They are saying now you cannot call him an oligarch, or I don't know, Cernovich says he's basically going to buy every black community organizer, every black church leader and official in the south Bloomberg is going to buy.

He will win the black vote just as much as Clinton did, and he's not even going to cost him that much. I mean, tens of billions apparently is what he's worth, and that's interesting because what did Bloomsburg do to get that money? I think he invented the computer screen. I think he invented computer monitor, Bloomberg or something. I think that's it. Just like Ahmed invented the watch, you remember he invented time itself and was invited by Obama to the White House. Cool clock, Ahmed. Well, it's the same. Bloomberg invented the TV monitor and it's interesting seeing as how all the corporate media has fallen quickly into line behind him. Cernovich is right about this too, you know, it's very interesting because they shared

CNN journalists before like Andrew Kaczynski, K-file, not to be confused with Uncle Ted, cousin of Mr. Clean, but Andrew Kaczynski doing reports on Cernovich joke tweets, as the way these guys always do, pretending they're not jokes, plain dumb. They do it with me also, not as much, but Kaczynski, some of these other guys from CNN and other of the sycophant outfits. They were basically riling up mobs against private citizens who criticized the government or the media. There was, for example, Andrew Kaczynski was threatening to dox some guy who made a pro-Trump meme against CNN. So essentially, that's a threat of violence to shut him up. This is all on air, by the way. I'm not making it up. It's all on text or tweets. You can check it. These guys like Andrew Kaczynski and others

were saying they doxed some middle-aged Anon who made Trump-CNN pro-wrestling meme. So that's what journalists in the free press and institutions of the United States do. There's your free speech. That's why you should always remember that anonymity is free speech and nothing else is. In today's world, only anonymity. So remember that when people try to take anonymity away from you, do not trust them that they will pass laws to protect your job or something. Who will enforce those laws to protect free speech, to prevent the company from firing you. The same judges and bureaucrats who railroaded somebody like Roger Stone in full view of the world and his famous important man. But me or you, you think we will have protections?

But so this is the job of the so-called free press, to go after private citizens and intimidate them into shutting up. But when it comes to getting a billionaire running for office, they say about Bloomsburg, It's not just that they ignore his many weird statements about, for example, putting blacks against the wall or bulldozing olds, whatever, you may even like that. But I just saw this thing the other day where a journalist saying that you can not call Bloomberg oligarch, a series of tweets, I'll try to find, he say you're exoticizing when you call Bloomberg an oligarch. The only real oligarchs are the Russian ones. You can only use the word oligarch when it comes to Russia. It's also not just that they want to give cover to Soros and Bloomsburg, specifically

them, by using their ethnicity as a shield to protect them. But it's not just that, because they protect also Warren Buffett and people like this. Why an oligarch would never drive a Plymouth, don't you know? Oligarchs don't do that. do not wear a scarf and drive a Plymouth or whatever and eat at McDonald's nugget with his grandchildren and be a kindly old man like Warren Buffett is so heartwarming. Which reminds me, like I said before, every nation has its vices, but I'm getting fed up with, for example, some of the Latino Americans. I think I'll have to leave here soon, but one of the vices of America, one of the vices of the United States is this kind of thing where the people let somebody like Buffett

put on this act of the kindly grandfather, and the Russians, for all their faults, their boorish, annoying, corrupt people, violent, whatever, but they would never put up with that. In Russia, on the subway, if you smile at people, they think you're an idiot, and it might have been Mark Ames who said this, that they would consider a billionaire who put on these affectations to be an obvious liar or if he was being earnest to be an imbecile. So now you have the oligarch age of American politics in the open where this guy who added nothing to the economy, Bloomsburg, and only extracted and became a billionaire through no innovation and only through government-granted corruption and monopoly, Bloomberg, an open oligarch, but you can call him that.

You cannot call him that, you see, because it's only for Russia. It's always only when Plato described oligarchy as a system of government where the weak and corrupt rich rule, and he calls them fat also, who lose the right to rule because they lack manly strength. Plato emphasizes this, which is obviously one of major diseases of the Western and pastor occupational class now also, but you see, Plato meant just Russians. He said only Scythians, only Russians could be that way. So anyway, that's not directly applicable mainly, Plato says to modern world, but if they want to talk Russia, I'll start to talk Russia on this show for really the first time I think. So this will be an introduction, and I'm sorry if many of the things I will say will be basic and known to many of you.

As usual, I have book recommendations for this show, I rely on books, and also on my friend Salo, who has discussed these things long time. But you can look up Paul Klebnikov's book, Godfather of the Kremlin, Boris Berezovsky and the Looting of Russia, for which Paul Kleb... excuse me, now they put something in my mouth, they put frog in my mouth. But Paul Klebnikov was murdered for writing this book, Godfather of the Kremlin. He was a journalist and he was murdered for this. But of course, Andrew Kaczynski and the other half-brains whose mouths fill up talking about our institutions and the free press and all of this, when talking about Putler and his treatment of journalists, they have nothing to say, I think, about Klebnikov and similar

assassinations because they were killed by oligarchs who were Putin's enemies and Clinton's friends. And another book you might want to read is Casino Moscow by Matthew Brzezinski. This one is much harder to find, I think it's out of print. But Casino Moscow, Matthew Brzezinski is related to Zbigniew Brzezinski, I think he's his nephew, so therefore a low IQ Mika Brzezinski's cousin, I think. But this is also a good book about looting of Russia in 1990s, and how essentially you You had Soros outlets there posing as banks, whose entire purpose was to launder money from looted Russian wealth to American institutions. So when did Harvard and other university endowments grow so big by the way, tens of billions of dollars?

You know Larry Summers and others later in the American government were directly involved in the wheeling and dealing in Casino Moscow and passing loot back to their cousins is so warm. It's a family love. But you see, this is Russia disinformation, what I'm spreading here, to make you lose faith in your dignity of authorities. Soon you will be told that you cannot call Berezovsky either an oligarch. You cannot call him this. It will be applied retroactively to him and to every other gangster that Putin castrated after 2000. And one of the worst oligarchs, by the way, of Russia's wild 1990s is named Mikhail Khodorkovsky. And he still funds, by the way, many American journalists and press, oh yes, look it up,

he funds the Intercept, isn't this interesting, he funds that old bitch, Kathy Young, the bitch. You hear me, Kathy Young? That's just the ones, by the way, who are admitted and known, at least she admits it. But I don't know, does Bill Kristol take Khodorkovsky money? Khodorkovsky still funds many of the journalists who attack Putin and also attack Trump. And I'll try to tell you a bit of the background to all of this and why they're obsessed with Putin because he was the first, whatever his faults may be, Putin was the first to throw off the control of the globalist cabal over political sovereignty of that nation. And that is why they fear Trump. And they still fear him, by the way. And I will tell you a little bit how it all went with Putin in the beginning. I will be right back.

This is all Rachmaninoff preludes on this show. I noticed before that you like them, so I do show now only Rachmaninoff preludes. The sound of real Russia. Russia before 1917. Aristocratic Russia. aristocracy, always a real aristocracy like Rachmaninoff was, always is the carrier of the character of the people. But Russia before 1917, he has Bolshevik Revolution. Look up what happened with Armand Hammer, by the way. Interesting guy. Armand Hammer, capitalist magnate with extensive dealings with the Soviets. Many such cases. I may go into this another show. Many such cases. I wanted to say something different in this segment and the next. On the last two shows I talked about Mike Hoare, the mercenary, and about CIA also idiocy in supporting communism in the third world.

It was America that supported a radical, anti-white, anti-civilization, decolonial projects. And for this reason I tell you that end of Cold War was a disaster because it allowed the American deep state to finally show its true communist colors, no longer having to fight the Soviet Union. Before then they had to distinguish themselves against the Soviets as a front. But now they're free to be as gay as they want. But I'm only getting started on that kind of thing. I have binders and binders of women with stories about it, about this whole communist subversion in American government. So I think I talked Angola and Mozambique and Congo last time, but you know there's other side of this too, that the CIA ordered some factions within it, because you have

to understand the modern government, the modern Western and American government hasn't been a unified entity for a long time. It's just factions and cabals competing. But the CIA also, some parts of it supported men like Hoare and armed and funded them to fight communism globally. And the CIA and other American organizations funded people much more radical than Whore or Bob Denard. I mentioned to you last time there were entire companies of ex-SS men in Africa fighting communism on behalf of America and liberal democracy with the USAID logo. I met old weirdo Lithuanian, probably murderers, in Argentina who told me America fund, I'm I'm sorry if I repeat myself, but America funded them to crush commies there and worldwide. America funded French integralists too.

And I mean the real kind, the Accion-Française fascist integralists, and the people who were part of the organization of the secret army in Algeria, America after that conflict funded them to go to places like Argentina and to provide counter-insurgency doctrine to governments that had to face down the communism pink wave there and in other places and it doesn't stop there either. I'm sure you know about stories Operation Paperclip where America brought German scientists after the war to help them fight communism, to help fight communism and not only this by the way but essentially not just scientists and doctors but all of German military intelligence guys on Eastern Front who were doubtless involved in murder, but they were all brought on board

too, because obviously they had the most intimate knowledge of Russia and how to deal with communist espionage and so on. By the way, that was Hitler's gift to the West. Not only that, but also killing off a seventh of Russia's population and destroying its industry and city so thoroughly that possibly Russia still hasn't recovered. talked about knowledge regarding World War II. But so America brings on killers to help a liberal democracy crusade against communism. Many such cases, Nazis who became liberal democrat after 1945, and all these guys became liberal democrat. And among the scientists who were brought on, you should imagine, I think that it was only polite and relatively apolitical people like Wernher von Braun who took America to

the moon. It was not only people like that, but there were among them those who work on a biological warfare. Nasty, nasty people. Look up who was working at Plum Island Biowarfare Laboratory before Lyme disease was suddenly discovered in Old Lyme, Connecticut, just across the water. Yes, discovered, since we're talking about Wuhan miasma. But look up who was working there at Plum Island Laboratory. Eric Traub, for example, T-R-A-U-B, who was brought in on Operation Paperclip and who was before that an SS doctor working with animal and tick-borne diseases. Oh, yes, researching biowarfare for Nazis. Nice men like this. America had no problem bringing them on and it's very interesting, by the way, so-called Lyme disease

because it's not just, I will talk maybe on other show entire segment about the puzzle of Lyme disease because it's not just the Borrelia bacteria but usually comes along with a lot of other co-infections several different bacteria like Babesia plus I think three or four distinct viruses so it's a kind of miasma inside the stick it tells you quite a bit I think about the way disease works the way you weaponize disease and somehow they chose this stick as a vector because it's a good self-sustaining organ it sustains this miasma complex of pathogens somehow but anyway that's for another time why am I telling you all of this because now I start to sound like Chomsky like leftist pinko like my Janine Garofalo you must understand I am NOT attacking America

for this. I'm American patriot and I think it was very smart. Whoever did this in American government should be commended. They were a patriot. Probably somebody in military intelligence did this. And what they did was necessary to fight the Soviets and I commend. Nor do I blame the far-rightists who joined America and suddenly flew the banner of a liberal democracy because from their point of view, that was the only game in town now to continue fight against international Bolshevism and they proved to be among America's most intrepid anti-Soviet warriors, as you would expect. No, I'm not telling you this, I tell you this for different reasons to show you how, not just how stupid and how dumb, but how the word in French is a méchon or méchon

m-e-s-q-u-i-n, this kind of vindictive, pointlessly stupid vindictive petty dwarf, evil little petty dwarves, the people in the CIA who are now, that's why I'm telling you this, to point out the difference between the CIA of back then and the CIA of now, the people in government and media who attack me and my friends instead of using us against common enemies. How small-minded they are, why not send us to fight their enemies in Venezuela or wherever? I tell you more of this in a moment I must take a quick break well here you could say when I say CIA instead of fighting us could support if the far-right really existed as a threat like they say they could support us to fight common enemies the way they supported you know SS men and people much worse than us before but you

could say what could your friends have to offer BAP aren't you all just And I'm sure many of us are, but that can be useful. You can look at what 4chan does through open source research based on autistic laser focus and intelligence, and they're better able to find some location in Syria and whatnot than the CIA is, who's mostly filled with IQ, low IQ people. By contrast, us spurgs are smart people and their propaganda skills are top rate. I'm not including myself in this, but the 4Chant guys, they're very good, and I'm not even talking about them, I'm talking about the veterans and soldiers. I don't need to say this, but many of my audience is veterans and soldiers, and I've stopped posting their insignia with my book that they send me in photograph, because I don't want

undue attention on them after the hit pieces on me from last fall, you know, I appreciate some media attention, I want publicity, but it comes with a price and I don't want to expose my fans, so I stopped posting those photos. But you know, since Clinton years, since the 1990s, America has focused on its own veterans as a terror threat. It's completely insane. And it sort of tracks administrations, this trend. As administrations change, they change the definition of national enemy. So Bush W comes in and the focus is on Muslims. But then as soon as Obama returns, the focus is again on the evil white veteran. And the events of 2015, after Trump declared he would run, it just put this whole government

media academia complex into overdrive, trying to target the supposed danger of the alt-right. And what I'm telling you is these people like, for example, at Atlantic publication and all of this and the related government bodies, they want a domestic insurgency and they're gung-ho about America going to war with its own supposed far-right. Because these are the signals they're getting from people inside America's own agencies. That's right. That's why the Atlantic and other fake media front groups, they keep having conferences trying to compare the alt-right or the new right, whatever you want to call it, they're They're always trying to compare it to ISIS, and this is something that's been happening since 2015.

Charlottesville, which was a government creation, and other recent attempts at similar buffoonery, and they're doing all this kind of fake gay ops now, and going into 2020s, this will only increase. For example, they captured this guy recently whose screen name was Norman Spear, some, You would think nutcase, white nationalist terrorist nutcase, okay? But no one I knew had ever heard of him. You can look him up, news reports, Norman Speer, he's actually some Italian guy. But he was running a group called The Base, fake, completely fake, you know, that's Al-Qaeda name in Arabic. You couldn't get more contrived, The Base, and trying to kick off a domestic insurgency like Adam Waffen fake group did before him. And of course he's an ex-CIA, special ops guy from Afghanistan and so forth.

This is all news media, it's not conspiracy. This is what these people are concerned with now, trying to meme domestic terrorism. That's what your counter-terrorism establishment is up to. That's why you have this girl, Tara Borton, sorry I have to say her name, but if she's going to come after me and my friends, I have a right to respond. And she put out some article I think in the Washington Post about Rouge, in which she also mentions me, and the whole point of that article is that we're the American ISIS. And she knows what she's doing. All of these people do. All these people at Atlantic, if you look in the comments, which she must have seen to her own article, all the wine roasties and the Mueller-worshipping faggots on medication

of the Democrat Party, they're like, yeah, let's get our federal agent bully boys of of the deep state to crush these guys. So she sees it's like, job well done, right? She's driven this half-educated audience into a furor, calling for the state to commit violence against me and my friends, and for what? Enjoying a succulent Chinese meal? What did I do, really? I made some memes? But for real, you must know how this works, because people like her, or the Atlantic, that has conferences on how Altrite is ISIS, they don't necessarily get an order from above to do that. Instead, they're busy bees, they're careerists, and they get the signals of what government academic complex is talking about, and it's getting all hot and bothered by that month, and so they write things

to advance their careers, and they're smart enough to play by the cues. Nothing that's not in line with what government agenda makes it through, believe me. For example, another girl at Washington Post, I won't say her name because she's been relatively nice to me. You probably know who she is. But she tried, I think, to be nice, and she was going to write a relatively fair piece about me and Frog Twitter. But her editor killed it, killed the story, because it wasn't negative enough, and because she couldn't tie us to their retard ops like Unite the Right. So it works in an informal way, at the lower levels at least. But you can bet at the higher levels there are cabals of these vindictive dwarves in

America's communist deep state. Look at Brennan's face who just they lust for blood and are salivating at idea of a civil war domestic insurgency against the far-rightists. It's all a fantasy, a destructive fantasy. But this is what they want to happen. So I ask you how stupid and vindictive is the CA of today compared to the CA of the 1950s? And if you want to see nice illustration of this contrast, You see movie Spy Game with Robert Redford, where the new fake, gay, vindictive CIA apparatchiks get compared to the old, smarter CIA of Robert Redford. I enjoy this movie Spy Game, the CIA of, let's say, 1960s, but it's insane. They say there's this mess of veterans and soldiers who are into far-right things and so forth. This is what they claim right now.

I don't think it's true, by the way. I think completely false. But let's see if it is true. You really think the best solution is to expend all this effort to repress and to crush and smear and to try to prepare for some kind of insurgency against your own people? If the CIA of past years could work with literal SS guys to fight communism, but you cannot work with your own veterans and such, this is what happening, but that's how it is. They can't. Well, who knows? Maybe it's better for it. I don't know. Gladio, by the way. Look up what Gladio means. You can look it up. It looks different from three points of view. Gladio, which was cooperation of American intelligence units with the far right. And from point of view of the left,

it's evidence that liberal WASP United States was fascist or was willing to work with fascism to support support capital, their word, right, and white supremacy worldwide. So that's the leftist take, that America worked with Gladio and the far-right outfits like propaganda duet in Italy, which had fascist connections and had deep ties to American operations and so forth. From point of view of America, on the other hand, from point of view of a normal liberal or conservative, the answer would be no, this was just out of unpleasant necessities. These guys, it was necessity to fight the Soviets. These guys were fanatical, but some were smart people, and we could recruit them to fight common enemies, so why not? This is what a liberal or a normal neocon might say.

But from point of view of the far right itself, it looks different. The view of things about Gladio and such things is different. My friend Borzoi, the poster they keep pounding online, every account he makes gets banned. I'm supposed to get all worked up when some new face fad gets banned. But Borzoi gets banned every week, Hakan's second account was banned, and nobody says anything about these posters. But anyway, my friend Borzoi pointed out Operation Gladio was a way to weaponize us, to weaponize the far right or the hard right against the Reds, of course, but it was also a means to contain us, to marginalize us, to thoroughly document and surveil everything we did. So from point of view of somebody like this on the hard right, this Cold War cooperation

between the CIA and the far right is not entirely a good thing. But I don't know. I think maybe right now it would be good. If America really thinks it has this mass of disaffected youth and people, why fight us? Why not direct them against outside force? Direct us against outside force. That's always been the solution anyway with disaffected youth, has it not? Franco did this too, Generalissimo Franco, Catholic dictator, but he did this with his local fascists, with the Falange. He got rid of them by sending them to fight the Soviets and to die on the Eastern Front. And through this he fulfilled whatever debt he had to Hitler and Mussolini for their help in the Spanish Civil War, but he got rid also of local troublemakers and of political competitors

in Spain, you know, but to make even this kind of cold-blooded decision, you need to have some intelligence and some, you know, some type of at least cynical magnanimity and impartiality, and that's impossible when your government is run by deformed vicious dwarves who literally fantasize about killing their own fellow citizens. That's when you're a Brennan or a Jeffrey Goldberg at the Atlantic, you don't want this. want to kill your own citizens, because they are not your fellow citizens. So I say in these last two segments, few things show you better how America is a vindictive imposter class, not a ruling class, than this one thing that the approach they are taking to political disaffection of some of its own citizens.

Because the solution would be quite simple, send us all to Venezuela and Africa. I would be glad to do it. I will take one billion dollars to begin with. Please, one billion dollars from Bloomberg to do this, thank you. Why not from Bloomsburg? He has all his money from government anyway. I take break. Back to Putler and Russia now. Where was I? Putin was a relatively minor Russia KGB official, nothing special. Typical apparatchik, but apparently he was an intelligent, very professional. I think he worked East Germany in Dresden. And then in the late 1990s, he was chosen to be Yeltsin's successor after a series of career moves in 1990s I don't want to discuss right now. He returned after Cold War to Leningrad, Petersburg.

But he was chosen actually in late 1990s, not by Yeltsin who was completely out of commission, but by the oligarchs. By people who thought they could control him. So who are the oligarchs in Russia, by the way? Many of them were officials of some sort in late Soviet Russia. So, late communism, late 1980s, completely corrupt place, nobody believes communism anymore. And you have these guys who are, some may even be college professors, but more often they were local party bosses, or wheelers and dealers, factory directors, this kind of thing. People who were connected. And then in the early 1990s, after fall of Soviet Union under the drunk Yeltsin, Russia tries to privatize, and it's a complete disaster, but they made a genuine effort to privatize.

But the privatization process in Russia, as it was in, by the way, many of East Euro countries, it was complete fiasco. And I'm not against privatization, but what they did is they printed shares. Let's say you get a share in the aluminum industry, or some gas conglomerate. And I mean these shares were mass printed and they were given basically to everyone and anyone. Old people, college students, whoever, if you're a Russian citizen you got shares from a government in some company or some industry. And given that the situation was unstable and people need money right away and that if you own one share it's of no use to you. You don't see dividends, you see nothing. So most people chose to sell their shares immediately, and these connected guys, many

of whom I think Khodorkovsky and others had already been running black market transactions in late communism, so they were well connected to the old party and industrial structure, but they bought these shares often at discount or through fraud. As you can imagine, there was massive corruption in this process. Many were not legitimate transactions. The way these shares were consolidated in a few hands was with government access and skimming, not out of innovation and entrepreneurship. So that's how the oligarchs so-called, how they came about in Russia, and chief among them was Berezovsky, Boris Berezovsky, a huge criminal who, as I tell you, is studied in Klebenikov's book, Godfather of the Kremlin. And the strange thing, it was Berezovsky who picked Putin because he thought Putin would

just be a great technocrat easy to control but Putin I think he showed to the Russians and to the world he showed the supremacy of political force over money because he didn't play along and he slowly brought Berezovsky and the oligarchs down he didn't do as a communist thing by the way he didn't do communism he didn't cut their heads off and so forth he said from this point on you know you can keep your ill-gotten money if you play along with us and if If the Russian people start to get some benefit too, but if you don't play along, you will get crushed. This is what he told oligarchs in the meeting, and many of them accepted, and they kept their money and they became part of Russia's deep state now, and they are subservient to Russian sovereignty or Russian political process.

Others did not accept, like Berezovsky and I think Abramovich and Khodorkovsky, and they got fucked. And it's very funny, by the way, the way Berezovsky thought he could control Putin. It's a story that Masha Gessen, who is this ideologue in American press right now, a Russian emigre, who is a neoliberal anti-Russian ghoul, is what she is. And she got married, by the way, little known story. She actually, Hakan told me she got married to a gray alien in the Russian city of Pern in 1991. Little known story. Whatever she may be, mash a guess and look at her face. This ghoul, you know, she's a favorite of people like Fram and Max Boot and these other midgets. You know, they parade her around and they look, you look her up,

they parade her around when American deep state want to put up a big scarecrow and to scare the Russians, saying this is our Ahmed Chalabi for you. We will literally install a Lisboa commissar on you if you let us. This is American message to Russians when they parade people like Masha Gessen and Max Boot around, you know. But even she says, and I give you this preface just to tell you, she is no friend of Pootler, but this is coming from her. She says that Berezovsky offered to create a kind of fake two-party system in Russia with one party sort of centrist liberal, and the other party sort of neo-Kanish. And they would take turns ruling, I mean, skewering the Russian nation from both sides, with Berezovsky leading one party and Putin the other. This is offer Berezovsky made.

So where did Berezovsky get this idea, you think? I don't know. Maybe he read the American Constitution, or maybe he just studied how American politics actually works today. and copied it. Maybe one of his friends in America told him, you know, you should copy our regime type. The same way you see headlines from 1990s from, for example, Newsweek openly admitting backing Yeltsin, that Yeltsin was only re-elected with American support. Saylor talks a lot about this, Steve Saylor, you can just Google Saylor and keywords, but Putin rejected this and he, with some difficulty, he reasserted the Russian deep state, the Russian security state political control over oligarchic control. That's basically what Putin's regime is now.

It's a Russia deep state, a Russian security state having reasserted control. So it's very wrong to call Putin some kind of mad tyrant. It's actually a very strong state because it's ruled through all kinds of Russian security organizations. It's just the old reassertion of Russian intelligence network. It's just they took over instead of the foreign-controlled oligarchs. And a lot of how this happened had to do with crises that went out of control. In 1998, there was huge financial crisis in Russia, a disaster. I met Russians in Argentina who had immigrated to Argentina during that time, and I must tell you, if you're immigrating to Argentina for economic reasons, you have serious problems. But many Russians had to do so in late 90s, and then another crisis was Chechen terrorism

and war crisis in late 1990s and early 2000s, and Putin used these to take power. But I think Putin would have asserted control anyway. And like I tell you, he started to do radical and tyrannical things, like to tell these oligarchs who were siphoning off resources and money into international cartels. He did radical things like telling them, you can't do that anymore. And Russia actually has to start seeing some revenue from its industries and its resources. You know, Russia had amazing resources by industries and technology, even into late decade in 1980s under the Soviets. Russia had very big industries back then, in particular military equipment. And before you laugh at that, remember that a large part of American exports until very recently was military equipment orders.

That's what American manufacturing was reduced to under Obama. But it seems to be a problem with late empires, to use Kamiya language. But Soviet Union had amazing industries, which under the Chubais Gaidar so-called privatization plan. Look up Chubais Gaidar. These are the names of Russian ministers who were the tools of globalist cartels that looted Russia. And Soviet industries were completely destroyed under the free market so-called 1990s. And they were not replaced by a new and productive enterprise in the same way that American industrialization of the upper Midwest, it just made a wasteland of that region and it brought nothing good. So you can imagine also the immense problems and sufferings that Russians associate with

liberalism, so-called, and with these supposedly free market reforms. And by contrast, Russians associate the Putin years with a dramatic rise in living standard to the point where I knew American old NATO guys who admitted by the late 2000s decade when they went to Moscow and they just saw amazing things there. They told me and Berezovsky and quite a few other oligarchs had to go into exile when Putin started this process of a national reconstruction. The oligarchs who would not play along, who wanted to take Russia for everything it had and to keep working with foreign cartels, some were indicted, others were exiled, but in any case their power was taken away and in the case of somebody like Khodorkovsky who was especially full of arrogance, he was sent to jail.

And by the way, do not believe the stories about Khodorkovsky as the anti-Putin liberal champion. He's a murderer. Khodorkovsky is a murderer, by the way, and he can sue me if he doesn't like this. And like a lot of these guys, he had people murdered who got in the way of him getting his hands on assets in Russia. They all did, but in the case of Khodorkovsky, it's a lot more obvious, you know? And, of course, this does not stop Cassie Young and The Intercept and other journalists he funds in American media today. He still funds them to this day, and it doesn't stop them from moralizing about the evils of Putinism. Many times, such a journalist's attribute to Putin are the deaths of journalists that were actually murdered by people like Berezovsky and Khodorkovsky and others.

And it's very interesting, you know, right before going into jail in Russia, Do you know who Khodorkovsky transferred his ill-gotten wealth to for safekeeping? It was the Rothschilds. Cue please now, BAP is tinfoil conspiracy theorist, tinfoil. But okay, this is reported in major mainstream British press and American media at the time. You can look it up, the articles are still up, Google Khodorkovsky Rothschild. That's the choice the Democrats and media are telling you, you have to make now what I just said, whatever that is, they call that a democracy versus apparently the Putinism in Trump trying to bring back industry, to stop the rape of America's resources and to reassert some political sovereignty for the American citizen. Democracy versus Putinism 2020.

Yes, we'll come back to show I was like Thomas Friedman in cab ride, Buenos Aires once. except my conversations with cabbies are a bit different from his and from Bill Kristol's. More than one cab driver told me at the time that he wanted to see People's Committee rise up and hang the Kirchner's in the city center. This is when Christina Kirchner was first president of Argentina. So now I will have to leave Argentina for saying this. this was, let's say, around 2010, I think, I don't know, but people were so mad. Do you know why? Besides, of course, the fact that their lives were bad, the economy was being destroyed as it always is in that country. But the main thing this cabbie told me, and everyone was so upset, is Kirchner was worth

15 million dollars, just one five, 15 million dollars. He say, he say, this bitch is worth 15 million dollars now, and everyone was just outraged by this. How could this be, they asked, because Kristina Kirchner, the president, had been poor to begin with. But after being president a bit and a life in public office, she and her husband were worth $15 million, and this was seen as such obvious corruption by the people that they wanted to try and literally hang them through a popular revolution. Her popularity cratered in Buenos Aires province and city, and she had something like 3 percent ratings at one point, and of course she ended up losing that next election, but you can see it's kind of a funny as like that

episode in Austin Powers, whatever it's called movie, where one million dollars, but she was a piker compared to what Hillary Clinton did, right? The Clintons are now worth over 200 million dollars, not 15. And like I say earlier, the way this works is this is a finder's fee. So a $200 million finder's fee or facilitator fee in moving money around, that actually represents billions, actually at least tens of billions and possibly hundreds of billions of corruption in the aggregate that Clinton has facilitated. And in this connection, it's very interesting that she was able to facilitate this specifically as secretary of state. And that's the reason foreign policy is so important to the globalists. laundering. You have essentially a criminal cartel. And I tried to tell you briefly just

how it works in this closing statement. You see what happens in Ukraine, right? So you see how mad they get about Ukraine and Trump exposing that or Giuliani exposing that. And why is that? Because you see how many of the imposter families like Biden and Kerry, they got contracts with hundreds of millions in Ukraine. That's how it worked. American taxpayer pays at first to meddle somewhere, to go to war like in Iraq or Afghanistan, or to intervene and overthrow governments like in Ukraine or Libya. Then you pay again in foreign aid. Victoria Nuland, the pastrami queen who imagines herself Metternich, she said that America spent $5 billion on so-called democracy promotion alone in Ukraine before the coup there.

Now you have to think in some place like Ukraine, $5 billion is just unbelievable, enormous sum for that place. I don't even know how much has been spent in Ukraine by American treasure after the coup there, but it's a lot. So you pay and the money goes to companies there, to contractors, right? Government of Ukraine gets American aid money, gives it out to contractors, and then these contractors are supposed to do things like extract gas and so forth. And then family members or friends or other intermediaries of the globalist Kabbalah Parachiks, they get some position or do some transaction, so the money flows back to the globalists and government and their friends. You see how it works? The American public, they do not see a dime, they only pay.

And many times governments that are America's friends, or at least who are trying to reach some agreement, like for example in Libya, Gaddafi was keeping back African immigration from Europe through agreement with Berlusconi. These sort of pro-Western leaders, they get massacred, like I tell you on last show. Not sure people understand how much this hurts America's reputation abroad, except of course for parts of the European Union or similar cartels where some of this graft can be spread around. But you see something like Ukraine is for resource extraction and plunder directly, of course. Above all, it's not just that. It also represents a limitless opportunity to launder American tax money into pockets

of the Clintons and the Bidens and the Brennans, and worse still, above all, into whoever they work for, who you don't even know, who see gains not in the hundreds of millions but billions. And what Ukraine is for these people now or was under Obama, Russia would have been many times over. It's bigger, it's richer, enormous natural resources that can be extracted, and the opportunities for using it also to extract American wealth in this other way are limitless, literally. The trade deals, by the way, NAFTA, TPP, all of these other trade deals that they were trying to push are different ways of achieving this same thing. So you must take a step back and see what it means when they attack Putin, when they They attacked putler because he took away the promised land from the globalists.

And they never stopped salivating over getting their dirty hands on a prize like Russia. They still won it back. It's not just the plunder of Siberia and such that tempts them, but through that of Americans as well. More on this next time. Thank you. Bap out.