Everyone mind now on Wuhan miasma, this Caribbean rhythm episode 27 with Bronze Age pervert But everyone now mind on this Wuhan China flu 1000 point drop in stock market. Are you all stocking up on beef jerkies? Then the most ancient meat of all which is the long pig or human meat of South Pacific a tradition. I suggest in this regard you read a Weston A. Price on traditional foodways. It's very interesting because the inland mountain tribes would often come to the coast on these Polynesian islands and you see the flesh of the coast dwellers was seen as the most nutritious and this probably because they had high diet, high in shellfish. Shellfish are food of power. Also, you could try fish roe so that's why the flesh of these coastal dwellers was sought by their inland cousins

i could sit somewhere eating i don't know, one time i found two pound tub of ikra this red salmon roe, eggs of the salmon and i can just eat two pounds of this in one sitting you put bread and butter or you can eat sour cream and dill which is a filling for blinai Must make sure is high quality the salmon roe because Quality varies so much and I think actually most people who taste this delight Have never had a non rancid variety of salmon roe you can stock up on this But for serious if you want to stock up on something to prevent the Wuhan cold for you I suggest you know in Herodotus There is a passage about the people who live on the steppe and they live under cherry trees I think he means sour cherry trees and all of they would eat are the cherries the cherry juice and

Kefir, which is the culture or clotted milk Which touch it was also says the German ancient Germans ate this clotted milk. It's very strange this lactose Tolerance story from HPD crowd actually ancient steppe people seem to mostly eat only clotted milk or cultured milk but so Herodotus says this ancient people from the steppe they ate clotted milk in which they mix the juice of the red sour cherries and they also ground the peels of the cherries and they make a bread with it and this all they ate all their neighbors thought they were holy why do I tell you this because with these two elements you can control entry of flu into your system any kind you can protect yourself and what I mean is the berry you use

elderberry for this and for the milk part you use colostrum and I cannot describe to you what colostrum is except to tell you is only source of immunoglobulin that you can get as a layperson and so you can look up colostrum stocks whether goat or cow colostrum and you can use this to well, you can use it to protect yourself, to boost immune system along with Elder Berry and be just like these ancient steppe people that Herodotus describes, you can be just like them. Yes. But then the other preoccupation behind the Wuhan flu is the election. Will Bernie or Bloomberg win? Look, I can't talk about this. This doesn't move me. Will it be the gay CIA agent, the stiff gay CIA agent, or the two old Jewish guys screaming at each other, they cannot take this?

Or maybe it will be Biden, the senile token old white guy in the DiEM Coalition. If you could design a parody of DiEM Coalition, how could it be any worse? How could it be more of a parody? Well, you can add two screaming middle-aged peasant women with pantsuit and Adderall addiction. No one knows the way Ben Primary will turn out. I don't know. But at this point, even Biden can make comeback. For example, he's very far ahead in South Carolina in the last poll I saw. So you cannot rule him out yet. Best poll, by the way, is Barris. I think Richard Barris on Twitter. You can look him up. He has the best polling company by far. But no one knows now. The polls are very strange. New York Jews apparently really dislike Bernie.

Paul, I saw Bloomberg is number one for them, then butt joke, but Bernie Sanders comes in last. Why? You would not expect that, maybe. This really strange may seem. Why are New York Jews who aspire to American lisping, fancy-class culture, which is really office middleman culture, but don't tell them this. But why should they dislike Bernie? So I think the few Right-wing old ones like Michael Savage, but there are very few of them They don't like because they do have Bernie's number they know is this kind of a marxified knish salesman a crook this type is the Marxist professor with too much stained a blazer But for the rest the vast majority the ones who are aspiring to office culture Like I say I think is because he embodies too many of the ethnic stereotypes

They consider parochial and it's like the parochial personas. They're trying to get away from it reminds them of embarrassing uncle or other relative even from stories they heard and that's really a shame because It's a shame somebody who acts like Bernie or Irving crystal This is the elder crystal who none of you know and who acted basically like bro Bronx Jewish guy and is a charming in a ways more genuine and likable but that kind of ethnic schtick, it really makes assimilation aspiring Jews very uncomfortable. So you then you get this kind of bill crystal and equivalent aping Harvey Mansfield manners and not the one he grew up with. But in the end it's like you know you put a tuxedo on a monkey and let it loose at dinner party

and what's the effect? Well it's like that and it's why Trump's act of this whole thing I'm telling you why secularized assimilating ethnic is embarrassed of somebody like Bernier and it's why Trump's pact makes them also uncomfortable too. That's the same thing by the way because Trump has the stand-up Jewish comedian persona in every way. He's adopted this, he's a showman and you know some of the best memes about Trump are Trump as Rodney Dangerfield crashing the high society party except today there's no high society just people impersonating high society. So in this way the best thing ever written about Trump, by the way, about his cultural significance, is by my friend the city bureaucrat. It's called Trump and the return of pre-modern incivility. This

title of article, but I do not think you can find on Google search, so I will give you hyperlink it's archive.is slash J U Y 6 X okay so you can rewind if you want to hear archive.is slash J U Y 6 X I must tell you because it's a really amazing best article ever written about Trump in press I can't recommend this enough it's a scandal that it's not widely read it just blows away everything else written about Trump phenomenon. I cannot do it justice here but it's full of examples both from recent press on Trump think pieces and from history and sociology and how Trump, you know, Trump is very hard for the gatekeeping class to fight against. You all know this because when they say he's a barbarian or a boor, you know, they have problem because they have a whole

mythology of incivility as actually a positive and cool rebellion as a good. So they have nothing really to fall back on when they demand others treat them with civility. They have no defense when they are treated with incivility. So I'll be right back to talk a little bit about this, this great article by city bureaucrat Civility, John Murray Kadehi and the 2020 election. But in general, this show, the second half at least, is quite experimental show, because I will be reading a lot directly from other book by other people, in particular Nietzsche, because I was fascinated this week by his idea of a male versus female genius of various peoples, something that has concerned me over a long time. So I will read to you directly from Nietzsche and others on this show.

hope you enjoy. I'll be right back. Yes, you may have noticed I talk softer on this show. I experiment with new voice style. I think some people said that they had to go into psychiatric therapy because I was talking too powerful on previous shows. So I try for calmer voice this time. You tell me what you think. But I want to read for you one short paragraph from City Bureaucrat article. So I'm quoting City Bureaucrat here in his article Trump and return of pre-modern incivility. But most of Trump's civility critics only inadvertently highlight Trump's debt to pre-modern incivility. Such commentators unconsciously recapitulate the agony Jewish intellectuals experienced when contemplating their less assimilated brethren in the shadow of a refined

civil society. In so doing, they underscore the extent to which the crisis of Trumpian incivility resembles the socio-cultural crisis of Jewish modernization documented by Kadehi." That's end quote. It sounds like a lot, but what means essentially the assimilated Jewish intellectuals or assimilated aspiring Jewish intellectuals were embarrassed by their less assimilated brethren. That's basically core of what I just said and it's core of phenomenon you try to understand in this segment. Phenomenon that John Murray Cudahy documents in his book, Ordeal of Civility, which I discussed before, I think. But what this means, I spent this opening segment telling you and summarizing a little this idea so you can understand why Trump,

and to some extent Sanders, why they drive certain people really crazy, and I mean beyond the politics, they just drive them crazy because of their manner and because of what they represent culturally, what they remind certain people of, you see. So, again, John Murray, The Ordeal of Civility, I talked about before, his amazing book, but basically he talks about the difficulty many peoples, not just Jews, but many peoples had in assimilating to a culture of civility, the modern WASP culture in short, which is based on personal space, on individualism, and on the abandonment of collective identities, on self-forgetfulness, and a distance between individuals mediated by protocols of civility, which collective tribal or

or collective medieval identities, they cannot really accept these things. If you ever met anyone from that world, they budge in on people, they don't knock, they have absolutely no sense of privacy. Actually this is an example Cuddihy himself gives when he talks about Freud and his patients. Because what is the argument of this book is intellectuals like Marx and Freud, that really represent a kind of convoluted apologia for why Jews were not able to assimilate to this kind of impersonal WASP world based on civility and manners. It's really about the inability to fully embrace modernity and modern individualism and the codes of civility that go along with that. So for example, in the case of Marx, Marx was essentially motivated by, how should I put, he was

saying, you know, you Gentiles have all these stereotypes about the money-grubbing Jews and their dishonest financial practices. He was probably embarrassed by many such medieval holdovers of the usurer type that had persisted to his time, and probably still do two hours. And this is the core of the Marxist apology project. His turn was to say, you too, that's That's the thing. That's the core of all these apology projects. You too, you Gentiles too, you have the whole of capitalism itself that runs on similar kinds of exploitation that the Jewish usurer image is based on. So the whole Marxist economic history is based on this, on saying that you too, you are the capitalism is exactly the same as the Jewish usurer, as the worst of that.

And behind Freud is a similar motivation, this is all according to Kadehi now. Freud's patients were basically all Jews who had entered the middle and upper middle classes, professional or upper middle classes, they were granted political equality, but they had tremendous difficulty either achieving social equality Or when they did attempt this in fully to achieve social equality, they experienced enormous pain in having to abandon the ghetto mindset, you can say, the manners of the ghetto, the boorish, cramped, medieval collective identity they came from, where personal boundaries are never respected, where personal distance does not exist, where the individual is subsumed into a tribal way of life. So they needed respite, they needed a break from the codes and mores of a Gentile society

and its manners, the civility, the requirements of this civility weighed down on them. So in Freud's practice on the psychoanalysis couch is where they could take this break, they could just let go, they could let loose sort of the holdover of that tribal identity and express the great pain in having to bear this burden of modernity, of gentile manners, so that Freud, this is from Kadehi now, I'm quoting Freud's importunate course id. You know the concept of id now, right? Ego, superego id, but Freud's importunate course id is modeled on the importunate id from the ghetto or shtetl, the latent tribal dark identity clamoring for admission to consciousness or to civil society, in other words. The id of the yid is hid under the lid of Western decorum, a wonderful short line from Kadehi.

So you see, the motion here is the same as in Marx, to say, oh, behind this whole charade of manners and primness and civility, with which you can then are bad manners and, you that we smell like garlic or whatnot, but you Gentiles, you too, are the same importunate, dark, covetous creatures driven by base sexual urges behind your notions of a romantic love. You are actually driven by the same brutish drives, you see, and so forth. So the story of Freudianism and the main claims it makes, but Cudahy's anthropological genius is to show the origin of that in this project of tribal apology and he also has similar things to say by the way about Claude Levi Strauss the intellectual and interprets also Leo Strauss in a similar way but

the Freud chapter is really the gem of the book really a knockout chapter because it includes what I consider a knockout evidence from Freud's own letters and such that makes this a very strong case. So I only summarize for you Kadehi on this segment. You should read his book because it's much better than, let's say, the third-rate anti-Semite conspiracy stuff. It's very funny how the anti-anti-Semites, they never want to go against Kadehi. You know, they only want to go against K-Mac or conspiracy thing. I don't know. Most Jewish comedians, if you talk to them, they agree Kadehi was essentially correct, you know, because he's the real deal. has the number, well, not just of this, but of other peoples also, other ethnic groups

that were unwilling to give up their group narcissism and to join modernity in this way, but that try instead to modulate modernity, to use its codes and mores against itself. The way you see, for example, Brahmin-class subcontinental Indian women, some of the most insufferable creatures, because they do this very aggressively. In India, they all have some kind of dark-skinned Dalit woman slave. Look up the Dalits in India, by the way. They're basically the Negroid African facial features. It's amazing. And some of these Brahmin women, they look completely light-skinned like Narendra Modi. You saw him this week, but So they have this dark-skinned Dalit woman handle their chamber pots and they wash their behind with a washcloth, and then they slap them on the face if they step out of line.

But then they come to the West and they lecture middle-class whites about their colonialist culture of oppression, and it is in this way that you can understand the counterculture in general. Exactly this, what I just said now, that's what counterculture is. Even when the modern left or nice liberals reject the 1960s counterculture in its most extreme leftist political forms, they nevertheless strive hard to preserve the veneer of cool, the rebellion against uptight, stuffy, wasp civility that is the core of all counterculture, what I told you in the subcon woman example. So I cannot go into this article too much or all the examples city bureaucrat gives from both leftist and right media's very rich article in how Trump just drives the modern gatekeeping class absolutely crazy.

Because he takes away from them the veneer of cool. He makes them into the humorless mannequins. So they have to twist themselves in all kinds of ways to try to at the same time denounce Trump as an uncouth, uncivil, barbarian and outsider, and low class and so forth, and at the same time they try to reclaim for themselves the veneer of countercultural cool while they are the establishment. It's very difficult. I quote again from the article, this from a city bureaucrat article now I quote, what is likely is that we'll continue to witness the slow self-immolation of the gatekeeping class, as it struggles to recapture the social deference it believes it deserves, performing its outdated rituals of civility and select incivility in front of an audience that no longer cares.

The death of comedy in the last decade is perhaps the perfect example. Indebted as it is to the Jewish experience of civility, American comedy is not well suited expressing the viewpoints of groups and individuals protected by a ruling class that demands civility of its subjects. Sarah Silverman is an instructive case study and so on and so forth. He continues to discuss case of Sarah Silverman, very, very interesting examples. But so so it continues. So what I mean to tell you is that both Trump and Sanders represent in America's psychology right now. It looks like this 2020 election. Well, look, I don't know. We'll see the way the damn primary turns out, but it looks like the election will be three Jewish comedian

archetypes from a generation ago with Trump being the most Jewish of them all. So what can this mean? Why can it get any stranger for America? And I hope in the end that Bernie does win the damn primary, not only because America deserves a clear contest between nationalism and so-called socialism, but because in opposing Bernie, the national debate I think would be better from a nationalist point of view that I prefer, from a national movement point of view, than if Trump had to oppose Bloomsburg or Butt Joke, who are themselves by the way the Butt Joke, and this kind of half-and-half creep that is, for example, Bloomsburg, let Let me give you a counter example, if Bloomsburg was a Fagin type, if he was the kind of Jewish

stereotype kike type, as dark as it gets from imagination of shtetl usuror, that type, he would have more of a chance to win than what he is now. This kind of charmless flat delivery he has, in which he confuses for gentle manliness, but which to most people comes off as a slave driver from their worst corporate job nightmare. a boss from hell. Without even a redemption of Romney's good looks, Romney came off the same way. In 2012, it's why he lost, but at least he came off a bit handsome. Now, Romney actually is also some kind of tribal weirdo. Tribal weirdo. Same shit. Condemns Americans for their if-known nationalism, and then moves to Utah to get elected because, Well, why? I don't know. Anyway, look, a Reit City Bureaucrat article is best sourced,

smartest study on Trump, and I'll be right back. I am interested in peoples, in the true anthropology, and one part from Nietzsche's book, Beyond Good and Evil, peoples and fatherlands, this part. Some aphorisms from there have always appealed to me, and this one struck me long time ago about the manly versus female the male versus female genius in some peoples not all peoples not all peoples can be typified by this but let me read directly because it's so good so I quote Nietzsche now there are two kinds of genius one which above all breeds and desires to breed and another which is happy to let itself be fertilized and to give birth in just the same way there are among peoples of genius those to whom the female problem

of pregnancy and the secret task of shaping maturing and perfecting have been assigned the Greeks for example were a people of this kind like the French and there are others who have to fertilize and become the origin of new orders of life like the Jews the Romans and one could ask in all modesty the Germans? People tormented and enchanted by unknown fevers and irresistibly driven outside themselves, in love with and lusting after foreign races, after those who let themselves be fertilized, and thus obsessed with mastery like everything which has a knowledge of itself as full of procreative power and thus by the grace of God. These two types of genius seek each other out like man and woman but they also misunderstand each other like man and woman end quote oh how

this makes you feel Nietzsche says this become the origin of new orders of life what means amazing passage from Nietzsche regarding the merely type of genius of some peoples but let me come back to that later in a later segment so i think it's very interesting that uh here nature talk about the grex who are his favorite as a feminine type of genius just like the french who he also frequently talks about and much admired probably above the germans you could think so as you can tell this isn't really both types of genius that he mentions their compliments they're positive and it is not the typifications of peoples into masculine and feminine as superior and inferior their complementary forms of genius and I think I included the Japanese in my

tweet declaring this episode among the manly types of genius but is that so I am not sure I think maybe I made mistake in typing late at night because I think the Japanese cultural genius is precisely that of the French and the Greeks which is to adapt from others to be fertilized by foreign ideas and then to nurture and totally transform and perfect them into something different and majestic. I think at first sight you might think it's obvious Nietzsche prefers this type of female genius above the other, but it's only at first sight. But at first sight you can be forgiven for thinking so. You can see in many cases this is so, but not only in his estimation of the Greeks above the Romans, where he says that in the case of Rome the energy of the

people it went into the stem instead of the flower. He says this in another place or in the way he frequently praises the French over the Germans. But also in the fact that he saw philosophical and artistic genius very often as a kind of spiritual hermaphrodite. He referred to himself in this way. He referred to himself as a pregnant white elephant. He We say in Ecce Homo, his last book, that he was pregnant for 18 months with Zarathustra book And that therefore the Buddhists would call him a female elephant Why he says this? Because such a white elephant gave birth to the Buddha after 18 months gestation You know, who was therefore a kind of elephant minotaur, please understand So now then you see, in visions of human genius

gestation of great visions and ideas Nietzsche invoked some of the same imagery of female genius of female pro-creative power to describe the philosophical and artistic genius Paglia, Camille Paglia say one example when she talked how Goethe took his mother's cape and donned it on the ice I think in front of others one time at the ice Skating park what means well, you know this imagery of the hermaphroditic nature of the prophet or the seer or the shaman is very old, this image. Of course, the gays and the trinnies, they try to appropriate it for themselves and to say that this is somehow evidence that gays or whatnot were accepted in Siberia or Native American as tribes, as Native American tribes as seers or as shamans. But this really neither here nor there,

the shaman's cross-dressing, when it was done, it was not done to get sexual thrills. It was done for this ritual invocation. It had all cultic meaning, and I'm sure you can guess what this cultic meaning is, if you had to guess that it has to do with incorporating or overcoming somehow the alien type, a generative, a gestation power of Earth, Like in the movie Alien, where I keep thinking of that xenomorph with the eggs that frightens me. But the great Greek seer, Tiresias, is also said to have been turned into a woman for a while. And there are actually two stories about how Tiresias was blinded. The blind prophet, by the way, being another old image. But the two stories, one that he saw snakes copulate, and seeing this terrible act, he was blinded.

This is ancient Greek prehistoric prophet now. He saw a reptile doing sex sores and he went blind. And then second story about how he went blind is he was asked by Hera, Zeus' wife, which had the greater pleasure in sex sores? Was it man or woman? Since he had been both. And when he answered that it was woman and therefore revealed the fuck crazy character of the femoid, Hera in anger blinded him, you see. So Paglia, I think, considers this second story to be cutesy and soap opera-like, and therefore as a Baroque story of later origin than the snake's one, which sounds like a tonic, prehistoric story, and she's probably right, but here my point is that this old image of the seer, or the prophet, or now in Nietzsche terms, the genius or artist,

as being somehow cultically hermaphroditic or part female in psyche, this very old image, very solid image, and of course this is not a reflection on the low martial valor or the actual manliness of a particular people, since both the French and the Greeks were very high martial valor. They were in Nietzsche's list of female geniuses, but they were very much martial peoples, as are the Japanese, so you can hear a Mishima, an interview, he says the Japanese, they love flower arrangements and this highly aesthetic, you would think almost, he doesn't say it, but almost female genius of aesthetic perfection, but it needs to explode sometimes in warrior spirit, but it gets tired of that. So what this typification of peoples is not like the

English one into martial versus non-martial peoples. It refers only to highest spiritual registers of a people's cultural genius. It refers to the type of heights that the people may reach, whether it's male or female, and therefore this typification of peoples does not include all peoples. It doesn't even include the entire history of a people, because in its period of intellectual or spiritual decline or degeneration people will have neither kind of genius and I must take break and tell you about what happens when a people degenerates what happens to its cultural life so it's very interesting now to look at what Nietzsche consider happened to the Greeks people originally of high female type genius but what happened to them in their degeneration

phase and is very interesting to consider here another passage where he actually compared the Greeks to the Americans and to the modern Europeans and for this you must read the gay science section 356 how things will become ever more artistic in Europe which is really amazing section about meaning of the world for us in any case so it's very important chapter is not Not that long, but I will not read all of it here, only part. So beginning I skip. He talk in beginning how in Middle Ages, in the world of guilds and ranks, that men basically saw themselves as predestined, well, predestined basically for their jobs. So if you're a smith or a shoe cobbler, you saw that as your vocation that you were predestined for.

So he talks, Nietzsche continues, and I quote now, there are ages entirely the reverse of that I just described. The properly democratic ages in which people tend to become more and more oblivious of this belief, you know, that you're protesting for your calling. And a sort of impudent conviction and quite contrary mode of viewing things comes to the front. The Athenian conviction, which is first observed in the epoch of Pericles, the American conviction of the present day, which wants also more and more to become a European conviction, whereby the individual is convinced that he can do almost anything, that he can play almost any role, whereby everyone makes experiments with himself, improvises, tries anew, tries with delight, whereby all nature ceases and becomes art.

The Greeks, having adopted this artist's creed, if you will, underwent step by step, as is well known, a curious transformation, not in every respect worthy of imitation. They became actual stage players, and as such, they enchanted, they conquered all the world, and at last even the conqueror of the world. For the Graeculus Histrio conquered Rome, and not Greek culture, as the naive are accustomed to say. So let me stop for a moment here, the important part, where Nietzsche reminds you, Rome didn't really adopt Greek culture. It was charted instead by the Greek actor, or little Greek actor, like he say here, Graeculus Histrio. And this is also a very important hint to understand truth about Western identity, which is properly Roman in its origin, and not Greek.

But so let me return. So he say the Greeks actually became actors, and then he says something very relevant to modern world, modern America, modern Europe. He says, I continue with Nietzsche Now, what I fear, however, and what is at present obvious, if we desire to perceive it, is that we modern men are quite on the same road already, and whenever a man begins to discover in what respect he plays a role, and what extent he can be a stage player, he becomes a stage player. A new flora and fauna of men thereupon springs up, which cannot grow in more stable, more restricted eras, or is left at the bottom under the ban and suspicion of infamy. Thereupon the most interesting and insane periods of history always make their appearance,

in which stage players of all kinds, of stage players are the real masters. Precisely thereby another species of man is always more and more injured, and in the end made impossible, above all the great architects. The building power is now being paralyzed. The courage that makes plans for the distant future is disheartened. There begins to be a lack of organizing geniuses. Who is there who would now venture to undertake works for the completion of which milleniums would have to be reckoned upon? The fundamental belief is dying out on the basis of which one could calculate, promise and anticipates the future in one's plan, and offer it as a sacrifice thereto, that in fact man has only value and significance, in so far as he is a stone in a great building,

for which purpose he has first of all to be solid, he has to be a stone, above all not a stage-player. In short, alas, this fact will be hushed up for some considerable time to come, that which from henceforth will no longer be built, and can no longer be built, is a society in the old sense of the term. To build that structure, everything is lacking, above all, the material. None of us are any longer material for a society. That is the truth for which the time has come. It seems to me a matter of indifference. That meanwhile the most short-sighted, perhaps the most honest, and at any rate the noisiest species of men of the present day, our friends the Socialists. They believe, hope, dream, and above all they scream and scribble, almost the opposite.

In fact, one already reads their watchword of the future, free society on all tables and walls. Free society? Indeed. Indeed. But you know, gentlemen, sure enough, one builds it out of wooden iron, out of the famous wooden iron and it must not even be wooden so he's saying you know the socialists are idiots you're talking about building society and age which is impossible to build any society and talking about absurdity of free society how much there is in one short chapter only of Nietzsche you see as much as in books and books by others you get super distilled form of idea he sees here the entire fate of modern world of our time, the spiritual decline of democratic age, where everyone actually becomes an actor unable to be material for grand project.

And see also then, yes, the impossibility of socialism, I will talk about Nietzsche attack on socialism another time, because as you know is not in the name of capitalism, is not merely economic criticism of socialism that he makes, and in understanding spiritual incoherence of socialism, Nietzsche understands also its specific iteration in our time, where it's taken on the character of so-called gender or race or other upheaval, that is, he understands it as a code word for militant decay, for biological warfare on behalf of a lower form of life, without a specifically economic meaning. But more on this another time. For now, you must notice how interesting Nietzsche say about the character of people, the Greeks,

who he described as having a female pregnant genius at their height, capable of perfecting and maturing what they receive from others. But in democratic age, they become merely a people of actors, and this tendency to merely an actor or stage player's existence, this whole spiritual orientation, make impossible the type of the architect, which is in its monumental form the great achievement of the Romans, the conquering and manly type of people above any other. There is some strange connection I think you see in each essay between architecture as art form and this manly type of genius embodied in some peoples, that is capable of generating new orders of life, like you say, and of serving as foundation for edifice of millennia. But I must take a break and return to this next.

He's been puzzled by yet a part of Nietzsche where he talks about the manly genius of some peoples and he says they are possessed by wild enthusiasms for others. He says people tormented and enchanted by unknown fevers and irresistibly driven outside themselves, in love with and lusting after foreign races, after those who let themselves be fertilized full of procreative power what wonderful language but what means I've tried to see he gives examples and of course ancient Jews and Romans became origin over new orders of life in ways by the way by the way that the Greeks did not not for others anyway whatever you may have heard without Rome we would not even know of Greece maybe Western civilization unless it is a new beginning

beginning around the year 1000, like Spenglerians say, it comes from Rome, not Greece. But it was Rome and ancient Israel that formed new orders of life. So the third example Nietzsche gives is of the Germans. He asks, is it a possibility? But before I go on to talk about this subject, which is very important, I want to tell you a different view that you may have heard also about masculine and feminine peoples, male and female peoples. And you see this idea original in Gobineau, the father of steampunk racism, Gobineau. And in him, it is also, by the way, a term of distinction to be one of these two things, at least to be so in an intense enough way. His definition is, and I quote him now, I quote Gobineau, we may use here as a Hindu

symbolism, and represent what I call the intellectual current, by prakriti, the female principle, and the material current, by purusha, the male principle. There is of course no blame or praise attaching to either of these phrases, they merely imply that the one principle is fertilized by the other. Further, we can see at some periods of a people's existence a strong oscillation between the two principles, one of which alternately prevails over the others." But basically, Gobino means a peoples are ruled either by the demands of the intellect, by imagination, by religion, and these are female, but those, on the other hand, concerned with material well-being, are male. And he divides this into, well, at one extreme you can have the Hindus and the Tibetans, right?

So they're the female character in the extreme for Gobinau, because here in their nations everything, all genius and effort, goes into gigantic and beautiful temples, nothing goes for the well-being of man, everything goes into only the proliferation of religious cults, of high development, of metaphysics, of both theology and philosophy of a sort, literature and high lyric poetry, all achieve high development. But then, he say, when you look beyond this to the demands of practical life in such nations, of useful inventions, well, they have no technology really, no science or practical science, and none of the theoretical science on which technology could rest. And the power of observation of a real world does not exist either. And the Chinese, by contrast to, let's say,

Tibetans or Hindus, they have a male character. So they are inventive, like the Romans and the Germans do, this according to Gobinona, whereas the Greeks, they had a kind of a female character in the proliferation of their wild metaphysics, which is why the Romans exceeded them in useful inventions. And even, he seems to say, in positive science, useful practical science, which includes the great architecture and public works they had, and also the science of governing and of administration, according to Gobineau, by the way. So it is in this sense that he includes the Catalans, the people of Barcelona, and the Piedmontese alone. He says they are alone among the peoples currently in Southern Europe as part of the male sphere of character,

because they possess a male energy and inventiveness. And I think it seems to be true, at least when you look at economies of Catalonia and Piedmont even today, how advanced and industrials they are as part of their respective countries and stereotypes of, it didn't work when I put the tweet up about, and I said Catalans, everyone told me, no, Catalans are gay, and this, I don't know what's possible. But the vast part of the world, according to Gobineau, is populated by a kind of female or sub-female inertia. And the Germanics, says Gobineau, remember now, he is a happy Latin Frenchman, you must remember, but he say that basically the character of Western civilization as it exists now is fundamentally Germanic, and that where the Germanic element does not exist, Western civilization

does not exist. And I think he's basically right in this. And in his claim that Christianity and the other ideas, that the political ideas or principles are a kind of veneer for Western states, but that it is the presence or absence of Germanic blood and its particular qualities that determines whether a nation has this kind of practical, energetic scientific character that we know the West has, and which is shared in a lesser degree by the also male Chinese civilization. So here you see in Gobineau a view that is much closer to the neo-reaction view maybe, or the human biodiversity Steve Saylor, HBD chick view of things that is more concerned with IQ than I am at least, but where there is the kind of distant spiritual kinship claim

between Western Germanic civilization and Chinese civilization. And this may be right in some way, but I want to read to you from Gobinob, but actually he puts it very well, this idea of male versus female genius of peoples. So he say, the conquerors of the 5th century, he means now the R1B conquerors of the Roman empire, the Germanic conquerors, are you listening, Scalas, are you listening, Nassim Taleb. But he says, these 5th century conquerors brought into Europe a spirit of the same order as that of the Chinese, but with very different powers. It was equipped to a far greater extent with the feminine qualities, and united the two motive forces far more harmoniously. Wherever this branch of the human family was dominant, the utilitarian tendencies, though

in a nobler form, are unmistakable. In England, North America, Holland and Hanover, they override the other instincts of the people. It is the same in Belgium and also in the north of France, where there is always a wonderfully quick comprehension of anything with a practical bearing. As we go further south, these tendencies become weaker." And he gives some examples here, including exceptions of the Catalans and so forth. But then he say, and this is a really strange and almost shocking thing, Gobineau say, I must read for you. He say, our civilization has been created by the mingling of the Germanic tribes with the races of the ancient world, the union, that is to say, of preeminently male groups with races and fragments of races clinging to the decayed remnants of the ancient ideas.

The richness, variety, and fertility of invention for which we honor our modern societies are are the natural and more or less successful result of the maimed and disparate elements which our Germanic ancestors instinctively knew how to use, temper and disguise." To disguise? What did Gobino mean by that? What did Aryan invaders know how to disguise? So he continues and listen to this is end of Gobino quote He says our own kind of culture has two general marks wherever it is to be found. It has been touched however Superficially by the Germanic element and it is Christian the second characteristic to repeat what I have already said is more marked than the other and Leaps first to the eye because it is an outward feature of our modern state a sort of varnish on its surface

but it is not absolutely essential as many nations are Christian and still more might become Christian without forming a part of our circle of civilization. The first characteristic is on the contrary positive and decisive where the Germanic element has never penetrated our special kind of civilization does not exist." How interesting to hear Gobino says this. How interesting, but please, do try to disprove him if you can. I will say more on this when I return. So you know now what Nietzsche thinks of the actor, I return to Nietzsche now, I say before, but now you must hear what he thinks of opposite type of the architect. And to try to think why all the leftoids and liberals never Trumpers chimped out when Trump suggested return to architecture in the grand style.

So I quote Nietzsche now, the architect represents neither a Dionysian nor an Apollonian state. Here it is the great act of will. The will that moves mountains. The frenzy of great will which aspires to art. The most powerful human beings have always inspired architects. The architect has always been under the spell of power. These buildings are supposed to render pride visible, and the victory over gravity, the will to power. Architecture is a kind of eloquence of power in forms, now persuading, even flattering, now only commanding. The highest feeling of power and sureness finds expression in the grand style. The power which no longer needs any proof, which spurns pleasing, which does not answer

lightly which feels no witness near which lives oblivious of all opposition to it which reposes within itself fatalistically a law among laws that speaks of itself as a grand style." End quote. Yes, wonderful Nietzsche says this. Yes, the art form itself is connected to what in passage before if you remember where he talked about the architect as a type that designs the lasting and and millennial edifice of a new order or a new civilization. I don't mean to say Trump is this, okay? Trump is just a great populist leader who heralds my coming. But in any case, you see, is a penchant, the turn of peoples in their far-looking phase, in their beginning of great vision. It is a characteristic turn to architecture as the preferred art form, as opposed to those civilizations

that are in a democratic decay, which is where the actor, both as artist and as a psychological type, predominates. So that in another passage that I will not read for you, Nietzsche talk about the way that modern Jews have control over press, I think is Gay Science 361. And he say it is through their embodiment of the histrionic aspect, through their being actors as well. And he implies in this passage that the mastery of woman over modern democracy, the supremacy of roasties, is also over woman's long natural shaping as actress, woman being the oldest dissimulator, the oldest natural actress. So the modern Jew becomes a kind of histrionic creature through the press, and as Europe becomes more feminine, in this negative sense of the word, a kind of lower sub-female quality,

more democratic, more histrionic, Europe loses the ability to generate a new order of life for itself. It makes the opposite instincts, the architectural instincts in every way, it makes these decay. And society then becomes a playpen of narcissistic clowns. Well, I only wish we had real actors, but you know exactly what it's become, a carnival of insecure people seeking public approval. hungering for recognition, finally putting on the latest prefab identities in our own time. One after the other, in the hope of being noticed or validated, given public acclaim, anything, you get Instagram thoughts. That's just the least of it. TikTok trannies. So what you get is this great spiritual emptiness and latitudes that you might be tempted to call

overwhelming presence of the female element without the male. I'm working in Nietzsche conception now, not Gobineau, and that it leads to sterility. Except I think that even Nietzsche would say it isn't really the female element in the sense of female genius. Rather it is the dried-up husk of the ex-slut. So you might understand modern society at its so-called democratic peak as a roasty a slut hitting the wall and becoming a dried up sterile fem-cell and that's character of modern society please watch some tik-tok and now by contrast I want to read you something very different in closing about what could have been and maybe still what could be the alternative so I do not chop up words with you you know me I tell you what I think and I think destiny of modern

world was to live under German mystery and that feminine nations like the French, highly female in the high genius of female sense, female meant as complement here since most people again lack either the manly or the feminine genius, but female genius nations like the French would have acted as the incubators of the Teutonic genius. I believe this and I believe also that the Teutonic new order of life would have been something much like what you see in prophets Goethe, Lichtenberg, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, which was leading to a kind of a biological awakening of intellect. Darwin is only the lower form of it. I mean to say that the new order founded on German genius would have been like the Roman and Israelite before it, a new kind of religion for

the next millennium and not just a religion a kind of literally new order of life new civilization but one founded this time on consciousness of blood and breathing or what you might call applied Darwin or eugenics it would have thus been the final and true vision for mankind that would have taken human race already to the stars or at least colonized a solar system by now at least. So Germany should have won World War 1 at the very least. This was stopped by conspiracy of the lower orders of the spirit against the higher. You must understand it is as if Rome or Israel had been stopped from putting forth the seed of their great millennial vision into the peoples and as if darkness and inertia would reign on the world instead. But I think it is possible

still for this new vision to be born in full and to hold sway in the west and i remind you that Nietzsche say you only need 100 well-placed men to change civilization but among my audience for this show alone there are thousands and thousands more outside but i will close show now since it is show Nietzsche with another short passage from master himself so you remember However, how he talked above, about how Europe will become ever more artistic and how the proliferation of the female, and in this case the degraded female form of the actor, will make the architect and all that implies impossible. But Nietzsche later has another aphorism to answer that one. How Europe will become ever more virile, and this aphorism I close show on.

I read Nietzsche for you now, how Europe will become ever more virile. We owe it to Napoleon, and not at all to the French Revolution, which had in view of the fraternity of nations and the florid interchange of good graces among people generally. We owe to Napoleon that several warlike centuries, which have not had their like in past history, now follow one another in short, that we have entered upon the classical age of war, war at the same time scientific and popular, on the grandest scale, as regards means, talents and discipline, to which all coming millenniums will look back with envy and awe as a work of perfection, for the national movement out of which this martial glory springs is only the counter against Napoleon and would not have existed without him.

To him, consequently, one will one day be able to attribute the fact that man in Europe has again got the upper hand of the merchant and the philistine. Man is once again triumphant over the merchant and the philistine, through the martial virtues promoted by Napoleon. Perhaps even of woman also, who has become pampered owing to Christianity, and the extravagant spirit of the 18th century, and still more owing to modern ideas. Napoleon who saw in modern ideas, and accordingly in civilization, something like a personal enemy, has by this hostility proved himself one of the greatest continuators of the Renaissance. has brought to the surface a whole block of the ancient character, the decisive block perhaps, the block of granite. And who knows, but that this block of ancient

character will in the end get the upper hand of the national movement and will have to make itself in a positive sense the heir and continuator of Napoleon, who as one knows wanted one Europe which was to be mistress of the world. Yes, in And God, yes, this what I believe in. Nationalism as path to something quite different. The national movement as path return. This is the way to mistress of the world. Authoritarian tropical beach empire. A return to the future. This what I believe in.