Now already this episode 33, and everyone wants me to talk about the Masons, the Freemasons, because they are lovers of the number 33, especially as I open discussion of the occult on the last show, where I talk a very brief reference to the different branches of Illuminati, The Saturnian Illuminati that have hijacked American government since at least 1945, but maybe since early 20th century, and then possibly another branch that is supporting Trump in opposition to them, in opposition to the Molochians, and these, the ones behind Trump, might be the Gnostic Illuminati. So that while the uprising against establishment that we are seeing now may not be entirely what we want, because it is driven by just another secret society, the gnostic Illuminati

with the Trump election essentially affected a palace coup, and they took away most of the power from the Saturnian Moloch Illuminati branch that originates in Babylon. Please, this subject for this study of a lifetime, please search David Icay if interested. How can I begin to cover this huge subject, this labyrinthine evil, on just one show? I will slowly roll out this idea over many shows, you are not ready for this. But the idea here, which I must leave again in detail for other time, is that we are in a shadow civil war, that what we see on surface is just something very downstream of internal Illuminati power struggles, to which there is no access for plebeians like myself. And that, in fact, the gnostic Illuminati that work with the Pentagon and have brought

Trump to power, whose origin is on the European continent, they have an agenda that is not quite mine or yours. And Trump is just their vehicle to a different and rival form of globalism. And he himself, he is an honest man with his own agenda and is doing his best to carve out a pure nationalist middle path and to preserve his independence from this secret society. As far as my sources tell me, look, I cannot get into this now, you're all taken by this concern over the plague, a very strange plague, by the way, that appears in election year 2020 of Trump, the most hated president of all times when this plague appears, most hated by the whole machinery of government, of government international finance complex into which America

was integrated after 1945, and which long had the obsession to annex East Asia, to annex China as its manufacturing hub. And you see, by the way, the obsession with China in American geopolitical work since the 19th century. Complete obsession with taking over China. And now this is threatened. threatened this outsourcing to China and something unprecedented for more than a century comes out of there. This plague out of China, a disaster for the American economy and the world during this time of Trump and of elite infighting. And I suppose you can believe in coincidences, but then I have a look, if you believe this is coincidence, the timing of this, that's okay. Then I have a doll to sell you. That's right, I'm calling now all angel investors, all venture capital barons.

I call on you to fund my doll. It is a special, like a blow-up sex doll, but it's different. It's an original idea, I discuss it with friends now for many years. It's a pregnant blow-up doll, and it's a huge size, it's as big as a room. We have the designs and the specs. In other words, a giant sex doll but is as big as a room and you can climb inside it as if you were a baby inside a pregnant sexy doll. And this doll would have a birthing function, a blow-up doll with a birthing function, so that it would birth you. And I think this could be a big success in some quarters. Million dollar capitalization, who is willing to fund this? I think I could market this and make big money of, hello Frank Luntz, Frank Luntz, that whole

sector of the GOP and such, they might pay big money for this, I don't know, Frank Luntz, I hear things about his basement, let me just put it that way and leave it at that, soundproof in all this, Frank Luntz, two level basement, but okay, let's leave this. I want to bring attention for a minute to aspect of this crisis that I haven't seen many talk, and I listen to Bannon War Room podcast lately, and I think it's quite good as podcast go, he has manic CIA energy, he is mobilized to find solution, and he give mostly good advice, although I think he is wrong in his messaging on China. And I come back in a moment to talk this, Bannon on China and to give a warning to Bannon on his messaging China. Be right back.

Steve Bannon, he referred to himself and to others like Navarro around Trump, the trade advisor anti-China. He referred to himself and Navarro, people who were for strong early measures against Wuhan flu. He referred to them as old China hens. And he's called for a Nuremberg-like tribunal to be held in Wuhan that would prosecute the Communist Party leadership for this plague, under which the people of Wuhan and of the province of Hubei have supposedly suffered the most. This is a Bannon line. It may be that they have suffered the most. But I think Bannon's messaging on this and in general on China problem is not very good. these measures and despite, when he says it's very inspiring to hear him, he says he will

devote himself to revenge for what's happening and to bring the Chinese government to justice and accountability over this outbreak. And that's very good. He seems strong on this and he repeat a good point many times. But for example, he say whether this is a bioweapon or not, whether it was intentional or unintentional, it is indisputable that China lied to a corrupt World Health Organization in early January. And it spreads the lies that this virus is not transmittable human to human. And it was this lie that led to the present crisis because other nations did not prepare and worse still, they continue to allow Chinese to come into their countries, specifically a Chinese from Wuhan who were actually banned from going to Peking and other parts of China,

maybe even at that time, but they were allowed to go or maybe even encouraged to go to United States and to Europe, from where this spread to America, from Italy. So it's good that Bannon called attention to this and say this, and also when he calls for looking into the traitors within America, who help China both now with this propaganda around this plague, and also before for many years, for decades, who've been in China's pocket for a long time, offshoring American industries, destroying America's ability, as you can see, to build its own medical supplies. And now you see dire results of this. But I think in the end, Bannon's message is not strong enough, is not the right message because the problem is not as he would like to think with the Chinese Communist Party.

It is with the Chinese nation. It is with a Chinese civilization itself, a fact that he recognizes maybe without realizing when he starts, I've heard on last few shows, he starts to talk about how Chinese Communist Party is a continuation of Chinese imperial policy. So in other words, it can't just be understood in context of international communism or since 1949 Marxist theory in China and so on, but that it is in a crucial aspect, even according to Bannon, a continuation of very ancient Chinese way of being. So I think to argue actually against this, if you talk to Chinese nationalists, and I have in fact, you know, I'm a cosmopolitan man, I have Chinese friends, but many will tell you they are communist, and they believe in Marx, and from the ones I've met, this

is true, they believe they are Marxists, and I think this has significance beyond what Bannon or other regime-form analysts think, and I call this, these are people who pay too much attention to the outward form of the government, as Bannon does, when he exclusively wants to focus on Chinese Communist Party, this and that, but such people miss the spiritual significance of Marxism and of Maoism, which is that these are typically oriental misunderstandings of Hegel, oriental people's misunderstanding and twisting of Hegel, so that in fact the Marxist ideology in its Maoist form answers to the Chinese spirit in a very deep biological sense I think. So no, the present form of Chinese government is not in fact a continuation of Chinese Emperor

office who in many incarnations Chinese Emperor was not even Chinese as I've seen many times, But it is Marxist. China is Marxist in a way beyond ideology and beyond government form. It is spiritually Marxist. But let's leave off these kinds of abstruse things for a while. I want to tell you why Bannon is not right in his approach, his messaging to China. Because the whole, we want to save you from your oppressive government is not going to have any effect that he wants. The Chinese people stand behind this government, and to the extent they do not, it's not because they are liberal or they want Western-style capital freedom, capitalism, they are in fact far more nationalist, they are far more anti-Western and anti-Japanese and expansionist than the present Chinese government is.

So the whole Bannon line about how you will promote a decent, hardworking, liberal bourgeois or China, they may be all of those things, and they may even be into gay sex and drinking white liquor and smoking and who knows, but they also would want to nuke Japan, for example. And it's exactly the same mistake that Western or specifically American liberal State Department and liberal CIA people make when they deal with Russia. And they suppose Putler's opposition is a liberal savior, imaginary being like Kasparov, when in fact somebody like Kasparov, who is beloved by Western media, has in Russia not even the level of support that Green Party has in the United States. Putin's real opponents in Russia are far more dangerous to America and the West than Putin.

They are the communists and the ultra-nationalists. These are the only factions that have any broad support in Russia besides Putin. And so he is the moderate there. So I'm sorry if I repeat myself on this, but the people of Russia are completely disillusioned with any Western-style liberalism because of the raping and the disasters of the 1990s. It's been completely discredited there. There is no public for that. And in the same way in China, when they see on social media and in movies the insanity in America and the West with the microaggressions and anti-void hatred and this, they do not want that to come to China. They don't want that mindset in China. You know, believe me, they're very aware that can come to a liberalized China because

they have, in fact, many minorities right now within China that have legitimate strong grievances. Okay, not imagine microaggressions in this, but long-standing grievances. And the Chinese, the Han, I mean, they were crushed again and again into the 20th century even by the Tibetans, by the Yi, by many others within their borders even. So they are not very hot to give up their ethnic supremacism in their own territory And to abandon all of this and to pick up Bannon's model and become like the United States or England. Okay, so in fact anyone who reads 4chan or other boards can see that it is in fact very often Chinese agents themselves who are promoting a nignog worship in the United States or promoting

anti-white sentiments, identity politics, and all of these things because they see this is a weakness to exploit, and it brings to many of them a glint in the eye these weaknesses of the West, but they certainly therefore do not want to import them. So yes, you know, there is no path in China for what Bannon wants. The Chinese are righteously standing up and installing a government that Bannon wants. This will not happen. And he forgets when he called for Nuremberg trials, he forgets that Nuremberg trials were show trials. They were victors might makes right justice and they were dressed up as impartial law, which is by the way what the Nuremberg trial are so disgusting and mendacious. But if he wants that to get to China, he would have to do total war and that means nukes. Okay.

But, okay. So let's just say Bannon is not naive and he's wise to all of this that I'm saying and he's just being tactical. Let's say he just wants to weaken China, and he realizes or agrees with a part of what I'm saying, but he would answer to me, Bep, you are crazy, we are just propagandists here, we are doing a jet prop, and you cannot go there on a radio and say the Han people are cockroaches and locusts, and Chinese civilization is a sewer and we need to eliminate it, because Bannon would say, perhaps that would unite the Chinese people behind the government. And it would make us out to be the villains. And at this stage, it's important not to provoke your enemy into becoming more unified, more determined.

And I understand this, but I think this is being, again, it's being too smart. This is being a big brain striver. Why? Because look, I repeat to you, they are already quite unified. And in any case, your rhetoric about rallying enemies of the Communist Party, that in itself can backfire, because now those enemies can be painted as foreign stooges and banonite foreign agents, and they can be painted as anti-nationalist in a time of crisis. And so then I repeat to you that should you get your wishes, in case you should get your wishes and in case you should actually replace the present government with their only viable opponents, you would get an even more aggressive and expansionist China. So this whole thing Bannon is doing is now what in the end is the biggest problem with

Bannon's strategy of opposing specifically the Chinese Communist Party and not China as such is that it's too clever arrogance. It leaves your main audience, Bannon, who are the Americans, it leaves them confused. It sets them up for false expectations. It fails to shift opinion in China, which you would not, as a foreigner, be able to do this anyway. And it demoralizes your real allies, and this is what I'm getting at and what I want to end this segment on, Bannon. And it's not just Bannon, but Trump and others who wish to oppose China. They should drop their arrogant and self-righteous rhetoric about government forms, about ideologies, about morality or tyranny and all of this. And they should listen simply to China's neighbors who are your allies. They should listen to their concerns.

They should look at their history. They have always loathed and feared China, the Chinese entity. And they have refused to be absorbed by it. And it had nothing to do with the government or the party or not the party. Your rhetoric, if you are somebody like Bannon with possibility for a big audience, not like me with small audience, but your rhetoric should be to encourage and prepare your own side and people to tell them the truth, don't give them comforting lies about how there are billions of people just like them in China yearning to be free because it's not true and never will be. You should steal up your own side, which is all you can do, and then you should give encouragement and support to your allies who surround China and who need American help, or at least they

need American non-interference in subduing the dragon in a millennial struggle now. America empowered China and put the whole of mankind at risk. China's neighbors, on the other hand, the minorities also within China's borders who are trying desperately to resist being absorbed by the Hanbork. They know the stakes. The Hongkongers, the Hongkongese, they hate mainland Chinese. Support them. Let Japan get nuclear weapons. That should be your rhetoric. Support Mongolia in its claims and its independence. Support Tibet and the Uyghurs. Let Vietnam become even stronger. Let the Koreas unite and stop threatening especially Kim of North Korea. Give him what he wants. Give him nuclear weapons. Because he is in fact anti-Chinese, he is not China's attack dog, as many have been led to believe.

Let the Koreas unite again. Let them arm themselves with nuclear weapons and be strong counterweight to China. They have resisted Hamburg for millennia. They deserve your help. If you want to counter China, support them, give strength to India and to the thousands of devas and gods who sustain Narendra Modi to oppose China aggression, and most of all stop the insanity against Russia that has driven them into a near alliance with the Chinese, which if it comes about, neither America nor Europe will be able to oppose such an alliance. It's become a real China-Russia alliance. China's neighbors hate China for a reason, they know what it is, they know China is condition of biological stasis where the human being devolves to the human animal.

You don't need to adopt rhetoric like this, like what I'm doing now, but it should be completely possible on liberal grounds to say that you support China's neighbors and their aspirations to independence, to not being bullied, and people of color like the Filipinos and that you also support and want to protect minorities within China's borders who are unjustly occupied and oppressed. That's totally possible even for a normie to say. And that's really the only path forward that has any hope, and it's a difficult one. But it's made a lot more difficult when you get weird religious ideas about converting China to liberal Western norms and this rhetoric of liberal Ted Cruz-style freedom that, by the way, Americans can't at present even secure for themselves, but it's completely irrelevant

because if the Chinese should turn that way, they will still be a threat, and they will still be a threat to the peoples around them that want to resist being absorbed into the blob. I like Ben and Shou, so I do not mean to attack just him on this, but there are many who make this mistake, who are misled into this corner, when actually the only solution is to support those who simply do not want to be absorbed into the Chinese nation. It is that simple. And ultimately, ultimately, this is more esoteric maybe, this is my special hope. But you know that the South Chinese, the Cantonese, and I like oyster hot pot, ginger scallion oyster hot pot Cantonese dish, but their unity with the mandarins speaking North Chinese is a complete fiction.

The Cantonese are in fact a Southeast Asian people and should return to that. And of course all the free cities must be independent, Hong Kong, Macau and so forth support their independence, but Canton region itself should eventually break from China. It should be put for some time under Vietnamese protection and Mongolia should reclaim Inner Mongolia. Again, Korea should unite Tibet independent, Xinjiang independent, Manchukuo should be put under Japanese protection with the Japanese given a mandate to resurrect the Minchurian language and people in their homeland, the holy religion of Manchu, Manjushri, new sutras imported from India. This is my vision of China's future. Freedom and independence from those who seek, for those, I'm sorry, who seek a human path and who seek not to

be absorbed into the Hamburg. Now I go to break. He's a nice man, but another aspect of this crisis, I wanted to say something. I wish he would stop saying to shut down domestic flights, and I think he's even saying interstate highway travel, you know, you cannot go this far. People are already chafing under these restrictions. And please, I want to remind you that I was for very strict 30-day shutdown, especially complete quarantine of the big cities, but you cannot shut down whole country. It makes no sense when there are many areas with no plague and you cannot have that commie pinko bitch in Michigan, the governor there who indulge in power suit fantasies and arrest people who are hiking alone in the woods or shut down parts of grocery stores because

Because the Detroit knick-knocks are croaking out of obesity. And I'm sorry if they promote this mythology of black bodies and black power athlete nonsense when in fact most blacks are obese diabetics with genetic problems, severe vitamin D deficiencies that have always made them susceptible, by the way, to respiratory illness in latitudes with less light and colder weather. This is nothing new. They were dying in colonial times, too, in northern states. They cannot take that climate. That's why vitamin D was added to milk. So you know, without that, they are gone in the cold. When the lights go out and vitamin D is no longer fortified in foods through factories, what will they do? Hakan tells me he sees loose knick-knogs walking around even Alaska.

And tell me what they will do when the lights run out, because they cannot synthesize a vitamin D. So in fact, you do have some Swarthoid peoples who live in cold weather, like some Eskimos or American Indians who live in North Canada and such. They are swarthy, but they eat blubber. So you know, the blacks will either get all—all of them will get rickets and they will die from respiratory disease in an apocalypse situation, or otherwise he will be reduced to outside igloo begging the Eskimos for a piece of whale blubber. So just this community of blacks is experiencing the ravages of this disease. Everyone now has to suffer in Michigan, they are arresting people, going camping alone in the woods. You cannot take stroll in nature by yourself, or guys surfing in California, they arrest.

Tell me what sense this makes, when in fact, if you restrict people going outside, and I'm not saying at a tight-packed wedding like the Hasids and this, but people being in fresh air, sunlight, touching leaves, earth, all such things, if you restrict that, you You are basically destroying their immune system, you are putting an enormous psychological stress on them, on top of that. And this psychological stress destroys their immune system through a different path when you lock people in doors like that. And the problem, like I said before, is that the Anglo-Geo commercial mindset is so autistic and it confuses the economic side of man's existence, which is of course partial, but It confuses it for his entire world. And so people get very repulsed when you make that argument.

We need to open economy, GDP, our economy is falling. But the argument against these shutdowns at this point isn't just about the economy. It's about life. It's about bringing life back and not having a power-hungry heredian like the Michigan coming a governor, shutting people up under house arrest. I was drinking the other day, strong rum, looking at a soupy, very humid sky. And I realized this, that look, much depends on the nature of this virus, which is not fully understood yet. I mean, no one knows, for example, how it acts with respect to season and so on. And what's the point of these shutdowns if all you do is delay a general outbreak? I'm just asking hypothetical question. In other words, it's obvious that you cannot fully shut down a nation, not a Western nation

at any rate, and not a big one, and that you're not going to have simultaneous shutdowns of equal severity around the world all at the same time. So then what is to stop this virus from resurfacing in a few months? And then you will have a general outbreak anyway, but that is after you've considerably weakened yourself economically and psychologically with these shutdowns. And in that sense, I can see only a couple of reasons then to have shutdown. One is maybe you give yourself time to find treatments, to think this through, to make decision. And this makes sense, but you have to see the cost is very high. And then the second reason for shutdown, which would be a more optimistic reason, I talked to a doctor recently and it seems that whereas most classes of flu virus, rhinovirus and

so on, they are natural to the human host and therefore they become like seasonal weather or seasonal storms. In other words, they return in cold weather and so on, they return. Whereas the coronaviruses, which have always formed maybe about 20% of the common cold and flu cases every year, but in fact they act in a very different way. They are more comparable not to seasonal weather or seasonal storm, but to a hurricane. They barrel through, they cause damage and then they disappear just as suddenly as they appear. Some evidence that SARS, which is of course similar to Wuhan flu, that it acted this way, disappeared very suddenly. So the hope would be that Wuhan flu just burns out very fast like other coronaviruses, which apparently they do because humans are not the preferred hosts.

Which isn't to say that they couldn't return in pockets some years later the way SARS sometimes did. That is the hope anyway, that it burns itself out very fast, and in that case, it does make sense to lay low until the coast is clear. That is the optimistic reason to have this shutdown. So let's hope this is the case then, although much is not understood still about this disease. But I wanted to tell you about one aspect of this crisis, I mean that people do not talk about much, which are the long-term effects of these shutdowns, not just of the economic hit taking place right now, but the way this pans out in the months and even years ahead psychologically, meaning people, you know, even if you open up, how many people would

be afraid to go out to bars or restaurants or any place really that is close-packed? And if business will be down in such places, let's say 40 or 50 percent for one year, how will they be able to survive until people's spirits recover? Let's say they recover in a year, by then these places all go bankrupt. What about tourism? States within America that depend on tourism, Hawaii usually gets, I think, 30,000 visitors a day, and now they're getting 100 a day. So let's say quarantine will be lifted in two weeks, three weeks, they will maybe get how many more people will still be afraid. When this all ends, let's say May 1 or May 15, how many people will be afraid to fly or to go on any trip? And before you scoff at places that rely on tourism because you say, oh, they're all lethargic

third-worlders, please remember that this is quite a big category. It's not just that it's Gabon or something. It's nice countries too, like Croatia, you know, and other people there and other lands of American allies, they depend on tourism. So tell me what will happen when nobody shows up this summer to places both in America and abroad that depend on this. And within any American city, you must ask how many are employed in these service jobs, in restaurants and such, which we must face if it is true. Okay, look, I know there are make-work luxury consumption jobs. An economy should not have to rely on that kind of employment. But America has not yet shifted to a real manufacturing economy. That takes time.

So then I ask you, tell me what will happen to the people who rely on hotels and restaurants and nightclubs and bars for work. The catastrophe, if these fail for one year, is hard to measure for long term. And beyond the economic aspect, I think you should consider the kind of world that this describes, at least in the short term, meaning next few years if this does happen. My friend Hakan is very excited at all of this ending, this whole entertainment and service industry ending, but not everyone is an autistic hermit like me or like him. And tell me about the nature of a world where no one goes out because they are afraid. It's a boring world, okay? Hakan is thinking that wine bars will be replaced by worlds of expeditions and exciting mafias

in this, but no, I think it's just monitoring by Dr. Bricks will monitor you in your pajamas watching Netflix. That is the world they want for you, and you already have such social strain. Even before this plague, you have social problems, you have low birth rate and such. Think of the boring world of voluntary social distancing out of fear caused by these shutdowns of the world that is coming. That's the other thing, this infectious fear that will be generated by this crisis in near future. many scares, furthermore, will there be? I mean, when flu season, just regular flu season comes along. And many will be frightened and assume they have Wuhan flu, when they have any sniffles. You remember, the flu killed 80,000 people in America, flu season I think

of 2017. And by the way, I repeat to you, in Italy, the deaths you are seeing now have only barely exceeded if they even have the flu seasons of 2017 and 18 in Italy. And tell me then what will happen when just regular flu comes, which can be very bad. Will there be a huge scare? Will people think it is this? Will there be calls on politicians to shut things down again? And then recriminations if they do not, and conspiracy theories on both sides, some claiming that governments or others are hiding a return of the Wuhan flu for economic reasons, while others will claim that it's made up when it is claimed to be again. So the possibilities for panics of all kinds are endless because of these shutdowns, because people have been put into a state of hysteria.

People will be traumatized, maybe in a lame way, a lame trauma, but traumatized by a two-month quarantine like this, sure, they will never forget it. But I fear for these long-term effects, you see, and I wonder if these shutdowns are worth it. I wonder if more death will not, in fact, be caused in the long term by these shutdowns. I wonder also if then it's not better just to eat the pain early. Of course, the damage is already done, but wouldn't it have been better to eat the pain early and not have any shutdowns, to ignore completely the crisis and to suppress news the way Nicaragua is doing. And at this point it's hard to know because when people say to you, for example, that you will be able to compare Sweden, which is not shutting life down, with areas that

are, well it's true that there is no government shutdown in Sweden, but the Swedes themselves are taking self-protecting measures without a government law, similar to what the Japanese and the Taiwanese have been doing, taking vigorous measures by private citizens. So it goes both ways, I think, on last show. I tell you, on one hand, government laws for shutdown and quarantine are not fully respected even in parts of Germany, and on the other hand, in places where there is no government-mandated shutdown, people themselves are acting on this fear. So all of this will somewhat confuse all efforts to say, well, shutdowns work or they do not work. We live in short, I can tell you, we live in confusion right now.

It is already middle of April, and I remind you, there's still no explanation, not a convincing explanation from anyone about why this thing spreads in some places. It blows up wild fire, and in other places it's relatively fine. Southeast Asia is still okay, Germany, where it was introduced same time as Italy, it never became like Italy. By now, by mid-April, everywhere was supposed to be like Italy, but almost nowhere is. It's just New York, Spain, and North Italy, and that's it. Even though people were saying this two weeks ago, three weeks, any day now, any day Germany will be like Lombardy, the death rate will catch up. But no, Germany is okay, and Iceland, things are also okay. But again, Lombardy, Iran, New York City, apparently they blow up, nowhere else does. What is explanation?

How do you explain? I've heard nothing that makes any sense, Brazil even is okay, despite it had quite threatening signs a couple of weeks ago, but it's not that bad in Brazil right now, despite it has many conditions where you think it could spread very badly, which makes me wonder if this – so here I mention another possibility is that this disease is actually harder to spread than people think, or at least harder to spread at a viral load at which it becomes truly dangerous. Therefore of what explains it spreads in some places very much and causes tremendous damage is that it's been seeded With the primary target again being the United States and New York City in particular But that it was seeded there and in Europe and well then you ask who seeded it

Well, you look now just now at China I am recording this show and as I am recording According to IC News, China moved a carrier into the empty Pacific because the United States was forced to put, I think, four carrier groups, four carriers, into port due to Duhan flu. So look at the Chinese Red Cross envoy telling Italy, you must shut down economy. You are not doing enough. You shut down. You buy cheap from China. You buy now. This is what they say. So you tell me who is profiting from this. And then the danger is if Trump reopens economy and reopens society is Chinese agents will just reseed this in certain locations, you know, just spray it. And it's easier maybe to find the responsible parties with a lockdown. Maybe this is what's going on.

And if this is the case, if it is found that it was seeded by the chinks, the people will call for a reply. And the answer must be nuclear. We support a nuclear war against China. Let the Shugoths come, please. I talk too much already of plague. You know this lame house arrest is getting to so many I think and is worse actually in some other parts of the world. My good friend in Peru, username and it's a it's complete shutdown there so they even took the foreigners and Concentrated them not in camps, but in buildings, which is same thing in hostels So on there is a terribly lame apocalypse. This is the thing It's is the reduction of everyone to a domestic it's intolerable And I want in this segment to look at a different kind of apocalypse

where people actually managed to fight lethargy and maybe we will get to that stage later in this but I want to talk in this show an apocalypse that was the end of all domesticity of all faggotry at least for a certain segment of society a time of complete freedom and possibility but the contrast to our many matriarchy imposed house arrest is very stark I mean what happened at end of all World War I, right after the end of the war in Germany. And that whole time, let's say 1919 to 1921, which was a time of manliness and the rush of freedom and power that I describe in my book. And really, I cannot take the boredom of this and the lethargy. Like many of you cannot take the boredom and the state of dependence to which we're being

reduced through these lockdowns, where we say, please, we would rather brave the plague. We want a social collapse even, some people are saying. We want the collapse that you fear. All of that would be preferable to this world we are trying to introduce, where even after they open it up, there will be controls. We will be watched, we will be branded like cattle, made the property of Bill Gates and and other tech dorks who can vaccinate us like livestock and track us and surveil and put us under house arrest. So really to hell with your measures of control, I say. Nuke China and let's have the world liberated from the fandom bootheel of these power-hungry technocrats. I would like in this segment to talk briefly about book that is very dear to me and about a writer I like very much.

His name Ernst von Salomon, spelled almost like salmon, but with an O, S-A-L-O-M-O-N. And you will see, I tell you about him in a moment, is connected to this feeling that we've been put under during this plague. But maybe I do a whole show on him one time. He's very colorful character. He was born in Prussia in 1902 to German noble family, hence the Von in his name, although there is funny story about this name and Von Salomon I tell you in a moment. So he was quite young during World War I, born in 1902, but he joined the Freikorps right after the war. The Freikorps was a right-wing veterans militia that basically fought the communists in the streets in Berlin, and the communists were trying to set up a Soviet state in Germany.

You know, they tried this in Bavaria, they set up Bavarian Soviet, they tried it in Berlin, the Spartacist Uprising, and the Freikorps fought them there, they fought them also in Courland, this is a Baltic region, which had long been a German region, settled by German bolts, who are descendants of the colonial enterprises of the Teutonic Knights. These are the German bolts. The Teutonic Knights had taken this region from the Borussians, who were originally a Baltic people that gave the name to that area, Prussia, but Borussians. But this happened late, you know, it's not that long ago, the 1200s. The Teutonic Knights, they were immigrants to the Baltic, you see, by current definitions. I mean, if you move from one place to another, you're an immigrant, right?

So the Teutonic Knights were immigrants to the Baltic in the same way that the settlers from England were immigrants to the Americas. This is what we're told, yes? So just like Meyer Lansky, he was an immigrant just like the Jamestown colonists and the Teutonic Knights. So anyway, so look, many of you know this story. Germany loses World War I in 1918 because actually there was armistice and there had been no foreign troops on German soil. It came as a shock to most veterans who had won most battles and Russia had been defeated in the east. But now suddenly there are mass general strikes in Germany. The navy of Germany turns communist, mutinies in some cases, as it did, by the way, in Russia as well. For some reason, navies just love communism.

But so an armistice then is a forced, some say, unnecessarily sign. This is how Ernst von Salomon took his beginning, you could say, okay? He joined the Freikorps, and this is how his book, The Outlaws, begins. This book, The Outlaws, was written in 1930, and it's a memoir of this time, of the very end of World War I, or rather, the time right after it, which is described in apocalyptic and very poignant way in the opening pages. And the protagonist, who was a military cadet, he say, I'm quoting him, all I could realize was that the world I had known, of which I was a part, which my youth had been pledged, had vanished, never to return." End quote. So a world-ending event. So you should read the book because it gives good sense of this time and the armistice period.

So von Salomon fought in the Freikorps' struggles against the Communists in 19-1921, Although you should not imagine that he did so or that his friends did so for the sake of treaties or of liberalism or of middle-class life or anything else like this, or even merely to fight communism. This is something he makes very clear, that in fact both he and the communists were, although they were enemies, they were both fighting against the drab homogenization, against the global tenement being set up by the international system to enslave nations. And after he fought these battles, again right after the end of World War I, Ernst von Salomon did not rest but continued during Weimar Germany a fight against the traitors to his nation,

most significant when in 1922 he helped assassinate Walter Rettenau who was the traitor foreign minister of Germany, who was, along with other Rathenau, was trying to squeeze Germany dry in paying unjust reparations to the Allied powers as part of the fraudulent Versailles Treaty. This is Rathenau now. And this is where the funny story of Salomon's last name comes in, because after he and his friends assassinated Walter Rathenau, when he was put in jail awaiting trial, the local Jewish community assumed that he was Jewish because of the Solomon. So they say, oh, well, he's just putting on the phone and pretending not to be. So they sent him food and supplies in jail. But no, in fact, he was apparently a descendant of the French or Venetian nobility, hence this unusual name. I'm not sure.

But so he got a few years for helping in the murder of Rathenau, a very famous event in Weimar Germany, and when he got out, he just continued the paramilitary and anti-leftist and anti-traitor activity. So listen, do not do this at home. I think I tell you on previous shows, the guys like Ernst von Salomon during Weimar Germany, they had the police and the courts on their side, whereas today in America, in the West, it is the Antifa that have the police and the courts and the DOJ in their corner, which is why they can engage in similar extreme violence against patriots now. They can break Rand Paul's ribs, they can assassinate people, they can riot and so on, and they get a slap on the wrist, and the media never covers it.

So in Weimar Germany, it's not really comparable to now, and the people who are role-playing that, well you know about them, most of them are feds anyway, but this I should mention Organization is one historical oddity that you must have noticed by now, quite aside from any of this, which is that the organization that, for example, Ernst von Salomon was part of in the 1920s, which was called Organization Council, a secret organization. It was mostly ex Freikorps guys, the guys who fought against communism in 1919, veterans, who organized this secret society to keep down the left and to assassinate prominent leftist politicians and anti-nationalist politicians and media people. And it targeted, as most terrorist organizations do, it targeted important people. It did not blow up pizzerias.

It didn't blow up sausage, Weiswurst, and cabbage bars in Bavaria or Munich coffee houses. And I mean this purely as intellectual historical oddity, you know, that terrorists in our age, generally, they murder nobodies, the regular people they murder. Never anyone important, it's rather odd, don't you think? They never target important people, and in fact, when important people do die in terror attacks, again, excuse if I repeat myself, there is always something slightly off about them. who died in 9-11 terror attacks even in the tower. It was not just your usual establishment Soros type. And somehow such people are never targeted by terrorists, you know, important people. They never die in terrorist attacks now.

And yes, I'm aware of the arguments that important people today have much better protection than prominent people did in the 1920s or before. But I am, in fact, not so sure. And it's not even that there are attempts on them that failed, they're just never targeted by supposed modern terrorists. You would think people, for example, like bin Laden, who is the sophistication and logistics to pull off something like 9-11, that he would be able to plan a hit on some rather important people. Because, yes, of course protection capabilities can increase, but so can the sophistication and lethality of adversaries and terrorists. But no, for mysterious reasons, it appears modern terrorists have a hard-on only for

killing discotheque teenagers and people in train stations going to work, but they never target anyone important, only plebeians. It's all rather strange, as I keep telling you. But anyway, so Salomon keeps getting in trouble for these kinds of hijinks during the 1920s, But he's a very good writer, and so he writes novels like the one I'm talking now, The Outlaws, A Memoir of His Time in Freikorps, which is a very successful book. And then also he is a screenwriter in a 1930 make movie. And like many people on the far right with this Freikorps militia background, he's actually quite anti-Nazi and anti-Hitler, not out of liberal or humanitarian sentiments. But as you know, there were many far-right people like him or Ernst Jünger or the people around Stefan Goerge who were anti-Hitler.

And Salomon also had a peculiarity not connected to this, but he had a Jewish girlfriend who he protected throughout Second World War. But basically somebody like Salomon or Ernst Jünger could afford to be anti-Hitler because they were national heroes, they were basically untouchable because of the prominence they had won within right-wing circles and the hero status they had for Germany at large. But again you should not imagine Salomon did this out of liberal attachments. In any case, I come right back with a brief talk of life Ernst von Salomon and his book The Outlaws, out of which I will read you a page at least that moved me quite a bit a long time ago. I'll be right back with von Salomon Life as I describe to you life of a political soldier

and a patriot who he wrote screenplays during World War II despite being a known anti-Hitlerist. He was allowed to do this because of his extreme fighting bravery during a period right after World War I when veterans took on communists on German streets and in German Baltic region, the Freikorps. And I think people have some misunderstandings therefore about extent of totalitarianism in Nazi Germany because it was in many ways, as you see, much looser than Stalin's Soviet Union. There were all kinds of weird sects and factions that Hitler never managed to get complete control over in Germany. And one of these movies Ernst von Salomon wrote during World War II was actually a pro-American movie. Because for some time, again, suppressed history, this is, but Germany was actually hoping for

peace with America and England before Stalingrad, by the way. So it's not just when they were losing. But you know, the whole story about Hitler wanting to invade England and America and to conquer the world is a shameless lie. Much of what you experience now with China is because the communist FDR provoked Japan to a war. The same thing, Japan did not want to occupy California. Japan was going to chastise and castrate China. Japan had a program to free Chinese minorities and to protect them. And the communist FDR, when Japan at the time, as Mishima says, Japan was the most active anti-communist country, FDR in response to repeated attempts Japan made for reconciliation, they sent, for example, Japan sent envoys to FDR saying, okay, you will not recognize

our conquests in South China or of such and such, but how much are you willing to recognize for us to reach an agreement? Will you recognize at least part of our claim to Manchuria and so on?" And his answer was, nothing never. That is the famous answer of FDR. Even on eve of Pearl Harbor, those were the words, nothing never. Very cavalier attitude. That That is why you had war against Japan, and that's why you have China now rising as world power. It's wonderful, isn't it? Much better than having Japan as world power. You get rid of Germany and Japan so you can have China and Africa. This is what is called winning. But maybe it is. Who knows? Maybe there is a plan there. But so anyway, you have Ernst von Salomon during the war. He never joined Nazis.

But immediately upon the end of the war, he and his Jewish wife are brutalized by American soldiers, calling them Nazis and this, and like many people who had any positions of prominence during the war, even if they were apolitical, for example, the conductor of Furtwangler, one of the best conductor in history, maybe the best one, he was banned, I think, for a while and put under all kinds of prescriptions. And the reason I'm telling you this whole life story is to tell you never back down, never give an inch. And Ernst von Salomon is a good example of this, because actually of all his books the best one for which he's known, the most famous, is called Fragebogen, The Questionnaire. And it is a book about his answers given to a roughly 150 point questionnaire that was

handed to all Germans by the Allied occupation forces after World War II, asking them about what they did during Nazi years. In other words, it was part of the denazification process, and Ernst von Salomon, of course, mocked the whole thing, and wrote this book, The Questionnaire, about this episode, which you will not find out because it is out of print. But many people in America even read the book in the 1960s and 1970s. It was a world famous book and bestseller for many years in Germany where the people were just tired of the hypocrisy and self-righteousness of these tactics, like the so-called trials at Nuremberg, the show trials, and the questionnaire, and all this self-righteous stuff to cover up Might Makes Right, which is actually what happened.

So he never backed down an inch, Ernst von Salomon, and yet he couldn't be impugned either. As a Nazi this or that, he was a patriot. And I'd like to say not just a German patriot, but a European one, and even more than this, I want to read you a very powerful page from his book on the outlaws, which again, the outlaws, I repeat to you, is an account of his time from age of maybe 18 to 21 when he He joined this band of fighters who were all volunteers who fought not because they were compelled to by the state, but because they were seeking something. They were seeking adventure. And after the war, they realized that they have to return to so-called civilian life, to boring domestic life, to boring jobs, which are nothing but matriarchy, nothing but homogenous lethargy.

And I want to read for you first the way Solomon describes the outcome of their struggle. Because he's not one of these guys who say, oh yeah, we fought the communists and we won and it was great. When they realize essentially that in their fight against communism, Solomon says they are being used by the longhouse, by the global tenement that is now putting us all under house arrest. So let me read you just from maybe beginning roughly first part of his book. So I'm reading now Enoch Solomon, quoting him. The men who left the trenches in 1918 realized that in order to gain our individuality we must lose the war. They had discovered the great change in themselves. They saw that nothing was certain but that anything was possible. They came still believing in their country

and found that it was, as it were, an open festering wound at whose edges rough hands were pressing. They stood among the ruins and listened with incredulous astonishment to the catchwords and theories which are hawked about as the treasures of the future and as the wisdom and truth of the present. Look, I don't want to read you this whole passage because it's rather long, But he's describing the sort of nihilistic lethargy that was taking over lives of veterans right after the war. He say, and I'm quoting again from a book now, they return to their offices, their professions, but they were full of anxiety. They were very lonely and terribly disillusioned. As many veterans among you are, and he say there were others whom war still held as an advice. They saw failure everywhere and felt

that they were called upon to be the saviors of their country. There were many who thought that some message must come. But what this message was, none knew, though all awaited the summons. Feeling had not yet been wedded to reason. We were ready to answer the call of our blood. But what was of real importance was not so much that what we did should be the right thing, but that we should take some action to save us from the lethargy of the times. Okay, so he say how disillusioned they were and how they realized they were disillusioned even after the fight against communism. He say, we who are still fighting under the old colors had saved our country from chaos. God forgive us, we sinned against the spirit. We thought we were saving the country and we only saved the bourgeoisie.

An embryo thrives better in a state of chaos than in one of order. Liturgy is the enemy of all progress. Since we had saved our country from chaos, we had shut the door to development and had given free passage to liturgy. Those who recognize this fact hope that affairs will take a fresh turn. Refusing to resign themselves to matters as they were after the collapse, they had vague hopes of salvation from the East. They felt intuitively that the upshot of the struggle must be to weaken every tie which bound us to the West. Listen to what he's saying here. To weaken every tie which bound us to the West. He said, to reestablish these ties to the West would mean surrender, would mean submission to the deadly uniformity which gives the West its prodigious power on this globe.

The war had left the way open for us towards the east. And he even say, at the end, regarding his struggle against communism, he say that, you know, how should I put this to you? He is not pro-communist, okay, but he say he realize that they were fighting people who were also seeking independence from what he calls the deadly uniformity of the west, okay? He says, we were the hirelings of England, the bulwarks of the West against the mysterious force of a nation which was fighting even as we were for its freedom. This was our second sin against the spirit. He says they were tools of the German government who was in hock to the Allies and to England. So these are the two sins that he talked about regarding the outcome of the struggle against

communism at the end of World War I, that in fact, by re-establishing bourgeois order, they re-establish this world of liturgy in which we are still trapped now. And by fighting the Soviet Union, they were fighting on behalf of people who were seeking to enslave both of them. So this is how he describes it. But I want to end this show on a different note, maybe not so pessimistic, but maybe not more optimistic, but is why I made this show, in fact, just to read you this one other quote from the first part of this book, Solomon Outlaws, a quote that I have been pondering for maybe longer than 10 years, 15 years. I always found it very moving, thrilling, the true meaning of vitalism. And the feeling that I try to relate to you in book, the possibilities that existed still

in Ernst von Salomon's world and that exists still in ours. Like him, especially now, when we see the head of the Gorgon and how it intends to reduce us to a domestic, a crushing existence, we must remember these words from Ernst von Salomon. And I will quote from you now, very powerful from his, very powerful from his book, is here is the beginning of his book. He talks about when he joined the Freikorps. So this before he realized that even that struggle had been in vain because it had been on behalf of England and so forth, and on behalf of bourgeois society. But he says, among those troops that he had joined in the Baltic, now this is in the Baltic struggle, among these These troops were plenty of regular units with reliable officers, crowds of restless

adventurers on the lookout for a fight, and with it the chances of loot and the relaxation of ordinary rules of conduct. In other words, pirates, patriots who could not bear the idea of a breakdown of law and order at home and who wished to guard the frontiers from the incursion of the Red Flood. There was the Baltic Landswehr, recruited from the local gentry, this is the local militia, who were determined at all costs to save their 700-year-old traditions, their noble and vigorous yet fastidious culture, the eastern bulwark of German civilization. And there were German battalions consisting of men who wanted to settle in the country who were hungering for land. Of troops desirous of fighting for the existing government, there were none.

So he repeats, they didn't really care about serving the Weimar government, serving England. There were people who wanted, listen to what he says next, because these next passages have always moved me very much. This is basically why I make this show for you in this time of crisis when we are all put under house arrest by Governor Whitman, a commie pinko fat bitch trying to turn us into fete meant it dependence, and listened to Ernst von Salomon's words in his adventure in Freikorps. He say now, the like-minded ones were soon dissociated from the general mass which was swept eastwards by the crash on the western front. We seemed suddenly to have collected as if it a secret signal. We found ourselves apart from the crowd, knowing neither what reward we sought nor what goal.

The blood suddenly ran hotly through our veins and called us to adventure and hazard, drove us to wandering and danger, and herded together those of us who realized our profound kinship with one another. We were a band of warriors, extravagant in our demands, triumphantly definite in our decisions. What we wanted we did not know, but what we knew we did not want. to force away through the prisoning wall of the world, to march over burning fields, to stamp over ruins and scattered ashes, to dash recklessly through wild forests, over blasted heats to push, conquer, eat our way through towards the east to the white, hot, dark, cold land that stretched between ourselves and Asia. Was that what we wanted? I do not know whether that was our desire, but that was what we did.

and the search for reasons why was lost in the tumult of the continuous fighting. Is amazing, amazing passage from Ernst von Salomon. And I leave you on this hopeful note because I think this quarantine will not last much longer. That we need not hope for a return of a barring world of comfort and hope rather for the world to come that Ernst von Salomon describes. This world is eternal and it return Because it is a world of nature to which we are heading back Beth to nature BAP out