Welcome Bronze Age pervert Caribbean rhythm, I am back! This is the voice of Suntour, the Black Sun. This last week has been a DEFCON 1 level for me as I've finally been able to secure a refuge in a kind of Atlantide remnant location, same place I, you might think, gave Bobby Fischer a refuge. And this reminds me that maybe I should play sometimes a snippet from his interviews. Maybe I will put a Bobby Fischer 9-11 interview at the end of a show someday, or the one where he talked about a vicious yellow light. Many in Iceland loved him, they are a hospitable and noble people. And I believe on island there are graves hidden of Atlantean heroes from tens of thousands of years ago what Tolkien called the men of Numenor. The movie Prometheus hinted at this

but to travel during this crisis it was very difficult, exhausting. I've been sleeping two days, I think two days, still not recovered. By the way, when you are this exhausted there is only one thing that will bring you back. I find this lately is called chaga mushroom. mushroom extract. Do not let only the hippies to have a monopoly on this. It can help people on our side too. It is a black fungus and it grow on birch trees in Nordic forests. You should only ever get it of wild ground because you must imagine in lab is not same effect of terroir and of the earth and sky that come from it. But it gives amazing anti-stress on physical and every other level anti-stress and when you're not stressed out it gives

you enormous relief and strength. It is a tonic of strength. And I actually took it before sleep so I would go to sleep in good mood. Solzhenitsyn says, I think in the Cancer War novel, Solzhenitsyn says that only those inmates who took the chaga mushroom survived the gulag, the rest did not. So yes, getting past the locked gates during this global shutdown, it's in principle is almost like very old video game bureaucracy if you ever play this text-based game. I had to find way through several airports, get past several immigration authorities in different countries, and to find a way on map to middle of nowhere, I'm hiding in several places, you will never find me, But it felt like agnostic labyrinth to find path out of the kingdom of shadows, where secret knowledge needed to get

past the sovereign authorities of the hidden gates and corridors. And now maybe I am free of the reach of Zog, at least for a while. Although, you know, they could have sprayed me with SARS in the airport. I believe they do this. And now they're trying to overthrow Bolsonaro. If you see news about Brazil, just the other day, It's at edge, the local leftist governors have put in very draconian lockdowns and Bolsonaro is trying to break them, to free the people as the military may get involved. And just yesterday, he had the police raid the governor of Rio de Janeiro state. And this, of course, what Trump should be doing, because exact same grift, the leftist governors, Newsom, Cuomo, shutting down states, profiting of these makeshift hospitals.

But I don't want to talk to you about this corona crisis today. I have a different problem where basically I watch this show Counterpart at night is actually quite a good TV show counterpart, especially the beginning. The season one is what I saw very captivating where the world has been doubled. And so this man, a bureaucrat played by J.K. Simmons, he a very good acting J.K. Simmons has to struggle against this double, against his own double, and it almost made me enter a fugue state because of experiences that I have had with this. It started when I read Dostoevsky's book as a double. I strongly recommend this obsessive book to you, and it come, I think, in addition along with The Gambler, which is very appropriate because The Gambler also show you the rush

gambling and how you must go you can actually win at casino if you go with a spirit of a winner but this obsessive book the double you may read it and you realize you will be replaced by another person who is in all respects indistinguishable from you and this book the main character a master the look as I like Dostoevsky for this reason because he mastered art of the urban urban chimp out. I think I told you this. For example, I have a friend who felt humiliated by a doctor in Argentina. So the next day he walked to downtown Buenos Aires dressed as a woman on account of humiliation or sissification by this doctor. And his face is a very heavy pancake makeup. He put heavy lipstick, slightly smeared and slightly smeared rouge. And he

He walked the streets of Buenos Aires like this in a rage with a hand of a, how should I put this in a polite way, but he had hand inside the purse on a gun. You can get this, looking for revenge, looking for an opening. He sought an opening. I don't endorse this, but he did even worse things and in this book, the double, the main character did something I found very funny. He would be in similar mood of chimp out and he would go to expensive furniture stores and reserve very expensive furniture in a pompous way with never actually any intention to buy it. So one day I decided to do this, if you're in a frenzy, good mood. I went some time ago, this is long, I don't know. I was 19 I think and I go to this piano store, Steinway outlet and I look around and I test

some pianos okay so finally I come to face-to-face with the Beusendorfer now the Beusendorfer piano is very special I asked for this specifically custom made Beusendorfer piano with the black keys of the very deep bass on the far left side black key so you can play the Bach-Bussoni organ transcriptions and this is well beyond this by the way the Beusendorfer piano has magic sound quality but beyond anything else you find the Steinway is a cheap cheap imitation compared to it but now remember I'm not sure of what this is now but at the time there's maybe a hundred eighty thousand dollars or two hundred thousand dollars for this piano so I very pompously like Dostoevsky double character I asked somebody who was working there was a somewhat faggy

an over serious manager I asked him about this and I make a show and I play the piano and in fact I make very strong claim very precise claims that I was going to buy it and how and when and I reserve it even as far as you could without paying I talked about how and when I wanted shipped and then of course I never went back but I had left him my number in this process and this poor queer just kept calling me for a whole month every day a few times a day he kept calling it I sorry this is not very nice of me to do this scene but you know I paid for doing this because the more I got obsessed with idea of being doubled of this novel Dostoevsky's a double odd things started to happen I I was going to food truck for lunch one day and I thought I saw figure they are walking

away just before I got there and that he dropped a kind of briefcase behind stone pillar parallel to the truck and I thought this could be it it could be I didn't go so far to think it was actually my double but the feeling of paranoia that I was being trailed that I was being hunted and that he was dropping off a suitcase bomb at place I usually head lunch I had many such events such close calls you could say look it's better than I cannot even tell you what my friend did he's complete he's complete pervert he would go to prostitute havens in Argentina where you pay $10, $10 for I don't even want to tell you the kind of prostitute you can get for $10 but once I went to my paranoia go in different directions so my father tried to get me killed I

believe at one point this I'm not sure if I believe it today but at the time I believe that my father tried to get me killed in a suicide bomb attack I was convinced at the time that he had set me up that he knew which bus I would take and had arranged with suicide Arab suicide bomber but look anyway I'm safe now I'm beyond all that I've outgrown it I'm very normal now I don't have such fantasies of persecution and I'm fitting in here in new society I'm fitting in very good I'd be right back some people say and I'm not sure if to believe this But seeing all these stories, you know, I wonder seeing all these stories about a lift infiltration of American government Because some say that the whole Cold War was a fraud a ruse and it's not something I agree with

Necessarily not in full and you know, I'm not just telling you this to pretend to be a good boy I actually happen not to believe the story I'm about to tell you at least not full story But I think there is a value in thinking as a crazy because the crazy always almost always reveal some truth, but the thinking goes like this that Stalin would have been nothing if it were not for a land lease program this program where America transferred massive weaponry massive trucks especially logistical equipment to Soviet Union in in the 1930s before World War II. And it's very possible that the Soviet Union would have crumbled in the first months of that war against the Germans had it not been for FDR transferring this massive aid to the Soviet Union in the 30s.

The second problem, the second beginning of this theory is that the nuclear bomb was transferred to the Soviets not just by Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. They were traitors for sure, and you know about them, but it's not like they could go as if with knowledge of Prometheus and just teach the Soviets from scratch to make nukes the way, you know. In fact, I will cover on future show, but there are memoirs of American military officials as published by the John Birch Society, and this memoir is called From Major Jordan's Diaries. the diaries of a military man who was apparently tasked with transferring materials to Russia under Lend-Lease programs through Montana and Alaska. That was the route. And this document, massive transfers of nuclear material, of uranium, and of nuclear know-how

to the Soviets over a long period of time. And he alleges, this American patriot, Major Jordan, alleges that it is Harry Hopkins, a man close to FDR, who was in charge of this program. And you must know, of course, that everybody around FDR who mattered was a communist Soviet agent, completely penetrated American government. You all know, maybe you've heard the name Harry Dexter White, who was exposed by the Winona papers as a communist spy, many others were too, but the FDR administration was absolutely a communist administration that engineered the burning of Europe with Stalin and that afterward continued the struggle against civilization by following through on the plans made already before 1945, plans made to decolonize the world of European influence, colored third

World Revolution. So for example, they were supporting Ho Chi Minh since the 1940s. FDR and Stalin, I mean, had agreed as early as 1943 to support Ho Chi Minh. But American aid for Ho Chi Minh begins in earnest absolutely since 1940, since 1945. And the excuse was that he was a nationalist, although he was in fact known since the 1930s throughout Southeast Asia and in Southeast China and Hong Kong. He was known as a communist agent who had attended Communist International in Moscow. And it is America, by the way, that put Mao also in power in China. I don't mean just by opposing the Japanese, but even after the war, America was supporting Mao and not Chiang Kai-shek and the Chinese nationalists. They were supporting Mao through communist state department agents in Hong Kong.

That's an entire show story for another time. But Ho Chi Minh, certainly American helped, absolutely. And third pillar of this theory is that many of the examples I'm giving you now on this show and also previous episodes like the one many of you like about Angola, episode two, And the one about the Cold War, I think that's episode 25, many other such, where Americans inexplicably allies with its declared enemies against its own interest. Very hard to understand. And this phenomenon repeated, not just in one case, where America allies with communist or communist light against nationalist and pro-American leaders. This convinced quite a few people, and by the way, especially allies with communists against European colonials, and the case of Algeria is the most egregious, where America

supported a takeover of Algeria against France, and millions of ethnic French were ethnically cleansed from Algeria, I covered this briefly on the first show, but this phenomenon convinced quite a few people that after World War II, the world was essentially taken over by a banking cartel. And here is the kernel of this theory, here it follows, that the forces of international finance which were progressively taking over the sovereignty of nations in the 19th century is a process that only accelerated in the 20th and which Hitler, look his crimes and all of this aside, but Hitler is a process he opposed. He was one of only ones to oppose it, and it was on account of his opposition to this and not because of his crimes that he was targeted, as the crimes would have been, by

the way, made up whether he had committed any or not. But they managed to take over completely after 1945, and these people, this cabal hungered especially for the massive natural wealth of Africa and of the third world, which at At the time, it was still under European colonial domination. This was their problem. So this is the key to this Cold War conspiracy theory you could state. Step one of the New World Order was to end European colonialism. And so for this to end, the Soviet Union was propped up with money and armaments by the United States. And for this transfer of money and weapons, even during the Cold War, by the way, there is solid, solid evidence. But again, I'm not completely ready to believe this particular theory. I'm telling you now, but the key is

the hoax is exposed because America continued to arm and fund the Soviet Union even at the height of the Cold War. And there were many such international financier types even before this, even in 1920s Weimar Germany, who were capitalist but who refunded a Soviet Union. I will name some names later, but Armand Hemmer is a very famous one you should know about now. But essentially the argument is that the Soviet Union was used as the military arm of this banking cartel so that, you know, I don't know this is uncanny. I mean you see the same pattern when you go to these places. For example, if you remember I say on previous show about the Congo, but the Belgians get kicked out of of the Congo so it gets decolonized with American help. Lumumba comes in with

Soviet money so the Soviets are the ones who make initial push for decolonization often with help of American factions but Lumumba comes in and what happens he gives mining concessions to America okay so then the people of Congo they don't like Lumumba, he's insane, he's a criminal, he's committing terrible crimes against many of the tribesmen there, so he gets pushed out by this other guy Tshombe from southern Congo area called Katanga and he was the pro-western leader in Congo at the time, pro-Belgian leader, so you think he would be welcomed, right? He's the pro-western leader, he's nice, he's educated, but no, he's ousted, hunted down and assassinated, and Mobutu comes in, anti-European, anti-white, that kind of nationalism, and he gives the cartel its mining rights.

Angola and Mozambique is exactly the same story. Angola, America comes in, starts and funds communist terror against the whites, de-colonializes, kicks Europe out, and then the Soviets, who were the military arm of this push, they move out, the Marxist Party supported by the Soviets starts to lose. And guess who comes in, this factotan individual, nobody knows, Savimbi. He comes in with massive foreign aid from both China and the United States, and he gives oil concessions to who? To Rockefeller front groups. So in every single case, you see this same pattern, European colonialism, which is for For the benefit of the European nations, the European people and civilization, it gets pushed out with Soviet and various other communist factions.

Then the Soviets lose to so-called nationalist leaders that give concessions for their natural resources to members or factions of this international criminal banking finance cartel. In the case of Angola and Mozambique, the Portuguese people in this case and thereby Europe and European civilization are deprived of those massive resources, of the oil and the other resources, and these are transferred to the cartels via a temporary intervention by the Soviets. Who you see in this model, again, are just military wing of this. This is this theory. And I think this pattern in quite a few other places, so I don't know, it's very suspicious. So you know, I do not say that America gets mining rights and such. America does not get the mining right. The American people don't.

The American nation as a whole does not, because America in this model is only being used as a base of operations by the New World Order cartels after World War II, so that the average American does not see any benefit from any of this, no more than he sees a benefit from New World Order raping Ukraine the last few years. That goes only to gangsters and to middlemen like the Bidens and Feinstein's and others. So in fact the American, the average American gets shafted because he pays for all this. For example, in the case of Angola that happened, already he paid the taxes that supported the guerrilla movements to push out the Europeans. Then he paid the taxes that went as loans to support the mining and oil extraction in Angola and then he paid for the gas.

So he paid three times, you see, and that's what this New World Order is. It's a way to shear the American sheep, to shear them off their great accumulated wealth since the 19th century, and to use that wealth to plunder resources, to billions and trillions of resources in Africa and elsewhere. And in this argument, again, all the UN bodies, the IMF, the WHO, the World Bank, these are ways that the New World Order cartel coordinates the alliance between high finance and international Soviet communism. It's done through this middleman of these international organizations, through these bodies. And of course, once the Soviet Union is gone, we see now the same body as the WHO, the so-called World Unhealth Organization.

It has analogous role, only a little different, only on behalf of slightly different agents to carry out its will against the nations. So this is the argument anyway, and it takes a little bit of getting used to. It's believed not just by far-rightists in Europe and South Africa, by the way, but by many far-right Zionists, they believe this as well, that the Cold War was a hoax. And others from across the world, Japanese far-right. And as for myself, I am not ready to believe things this far. But the reason such ideas come about is because of very suspicious concrete examples like I gave you earlier, where America seems inexplicably to go out of its way to hurt pro-Western leaders and to promote instead communists during Cold War.

And even when a theory is wrong and crazy, I think it's nevertheless good to consider the crazy because it forces you to look different ways at things. And in particular, the crazy can reveal a true kernel, as if in a flash, that nobody else can. So, for example, even if this theory in general should be false, it's nevertheless useful because I think its central claim is that the struggle of decolonization, that this is the central event of the 20th century, and in many ways still of our time, this may still be true, that the fight is over the third world and its massive resources, including its human resources that are used to flood the nations with immigration. But you can see why this theory of capitalist-communist coordination, you can see why this would appeal

to certain kinds of right-wing people, it appeals to me too. Did not Heidegger, after all, say that Moscow and Washington are metaphysically the same? So if it's metaphysically the same, why not physically too? And if physically, why not sexually? What? Oh, I'm sorry, I must go for a break and now I must call on my lapish maidservant. I carried her here on a slave raid. Lapish maidservant, please come here. Seidiger say Moscow and Washington are equivalent and in this, like in many other thing, he followed Nietzsche, I think, who say similar thing about how Europe would have to define itself against the long term threats of Russia and America. But Nietzsche did so 100 years or 70 years before it happened, so, you know, I think it's more valuable.

Heidegger puts this in slightly different language and the simplest way I heard to explain what he meant by this equivalence of Moscow and Washington, I heard somebody explain this claim that they were not nations but they were forms of technology. And for full explanation, you'd have to read about what Heidegger mean about technology. I will cover on future show, and surely I will be excoriated by Heidegger Wiebs for saying this. But in this case, you can think of maybe what is technology. It's a frame or understanding, a way of understanding the world and man's nature that sees him as instrumental, that reduces him to a gimp, that denatures him to a cog. So whereas on the other hand, so Soviet Union and United States are technologies, whereas

as on the other hand, Europe can be a nation or nations, and then it can represent a human alternative to technology, not a technological one. And men who put this way is not Heideggerian, the man who told me this, but I think this is a easy way to understand what means. Although if you are interested in the subject and more general into how the modern state acts like a parasite or a vampire on a people, You should read instead a chapter in Nietzsche's Zarathustra where he calls the modern state as the coldest of all cold monsters, where he says that the modern state, including modern nation state, does not actually represent a historical people, but distorts and deforms it, destroys its ancient laws and customs and way of being, destroys and obscures from a people

its ultimate and highest aim, and replaces it instead with a fake material striving, A fake militarism, fake desires, the ultimate demagogue being then the modern state in all its forms. Whereas a people, a true people instead emerges from the bosom of nature and it does not have any use for things like the modern state. It has an entirely different task and this task is a people is nature's convoluted way to a few great men. It is the secret intention of nature to beget supreme specimens of various kinds. And a people is nature's circuitous path to this aim, whereas a state, the modern state destroys that, and the worst of the modern states are the three forms of socialism that emerged in the 1930s, the three socialisms that have been competing for a long time for

mastery over mankind, the three monsters. This I stand alone today, and I preach to you the gospel of nature and the cleansing hand of fire that will return mankind to a way of energy, of full and supple energy. But why I say this? Because on a level, the struggle against this modern vampiric tyranny is the people who struggle with it are the anti-globalists of various kinds, whether the traditional European nationalists who seek the independence of nations from being absorbed into a superstate structure since at least 1945, or in the United States various of the anti-internationalist right which formerly was the anti-communist right, not only the John Birch Society, but other similar factions, the anti-communist right that was during the Cold War, you can

think of it not entirely fair comparison, but what the alt-right tried to be in 2016 or 2017, or in another form what the libertarians with Ron Paul was or what the Tea Party tried to be before, let's say, Trump had failed, was they all failed, but you see the successive struggle of the American people to retrieve their freedom, maybe too late. But the quickest way to define it is a political group concerned with preserving a national sovereignty against the incursions of an international cabal that takes away your privileges, your wealth and your freedom, calling all of them racist. And that also stands, this political group that I'm talking about, that we are on the side of, it stands against the establishment or the fake shadow right, which formerly was

impersonated by astroturf CIA nigger agents like William F. Buckley on the intellectual front, what we might call the conservative today. And nearly every Republican politician in Congress was similarly compromised and so forth. So in other words, the political forebears of those of us on this as yet undefined sphere, our political forebears are the anti-communist factions in the United States and in Europe in the 20th century during the Cold War. Because they were the only ones concerned with preserving their ancient rites and privileges against the onslaught of these modern monsters. So accordingly, the danger the cartel and the Soviets faced at the time was precisely these factions, and not, as you might think, William F. Buckley or the establishment right or even somebody like Nixon.

But these factions, variously slandered as the hard right, the mouth-breathers and all this. In fact, they were the only ones who were not completely insane, who were not trying to erect the Tower of Babel as an excuse to plunder nations. So this is my somewhat convoluted way to get to the conspiracy theory of the time. Excuse me, the Kennedy assassination, which has actually overplayed too many movies and these things. For that reason, I never really interested me. I got bored of it very early. But of course, it's an important event because this is when the CIA niggers invented the words conspiracy theory. As anyone who doesn't believe in a government story is conspiracy theorist, has to be dismissed as a nutcase. And I'm sure you have your favorite ideas about who did it.

By the way, I am told at the time nobody believed as a government story about who killed JFK and so forth. But Roger Stone right now, his very convincing book that LBJ did it together with other factions, Texas Oil Interests, the CIA, Mafia, and so forth, and various others, because in fact JFK pissed off a lot of people, and so there was a common interest in many factions to have him off. But according to Roger Stone, it was chiefly LBJ and TOG, T-O-G, or what I like to call called Texas Occupied Government, that this was the responsible party, LBJ did it in Dallas. And the man who carried it out or who coordinated this assassination was George Bush, Sr., president of America in 1989. You know, it's odd how Bush, for something like 30 or 40 years, pretended not to have

remembered when he was, where he was the day that JFK was assassinated, which is unheard or for Americans at the time to say they don't know where they were that day. And then finally in the 1990s I think he admitted, well, you know, I was actually on the outskirts of Dallas. And of course that's not evidence of anything, but it's odd. And he made a certain phone call later that day from outside Dallas to give himself cover. But Roger Stone makes a convincing case about LBJ, but look, the point is I have somewhat different and much simpler opinion about this, which is that it is what it looks like. It is that the Russians did it. The Russians killed JFK. Now I'm not trying to promote Russia hate or Russia hoax. There is a reason I believe this that is connected with what I said earlier.

You know, the image of a JFK that people have is that a blue dog Democrat and cold warrior is totally wrong. He was one of the worst communist ass-kissers in history, second only to FDR. He let Cuban allies get butchered at Bay of Pigs, this well-known, for which the dumb movie The Good Shepherd with, I was going to say Martin Sheen, but it's not Martin Sheen. It's the guy who was in The Born Supremacy, I forget his name. He has fetal alcohol syndrome, but The Good Shepherd made by Robert the Negro tries to absorb the Mick Comey JFK of this disaster of Bay of Pigs and is very insidious by blaming it on a wasp's rigidity and coldness, just an absurd, you know. Then in 1962, in the fall of 1962, it's election time, and JFK pretended to get mad all of a sudden right before elections.

He pretended to get very, very mad about the missiles in Cuba that actually had been known for many months by many people, and then Khrushchev pretended to back down in order to help JFK's party do well in the fall elections, although in fact no missiles were removed from Cuba. This is what I hear. And it doesn't stop there. JFK stopped Britain from equipping its air force with the Skybolt nuclear weapons that England had spent a huge fortune developing this means of putting nuclear weapons on its plane and JFK stopped this to appease the Soviets and he later signed a partial nuclear test ban treaty that only tied America's hands and not Russia so it goes on and on. So the thinking goes, this is not my theory but a man I cannot name, but the thinking

goes that by 1963 it was presidential election year and actually people did not like JFK. You are told they loved him, but it is not true. They were tired of him by then, and the American people were getting indignant about his repeated weakness and his repeated gifts to the Soviets. They were demanding some action. So by that time, he was no longer in a position to do good to the Soviets. So you know, they decided to get him out, to get him out, to get him out of the picture. But in doing so, they would have achieved also the ultimate prize. And what I mean is that by killing him and having it look like it was done by the so-called hard right or the anti-communist right that I just mentioned, this would allow his brother the insane Bobby Kennedy, who was a Attorney General.

It would allow him to destroy all the anti-communist factions in a reprisal, in a purge. And you must understand the unusual situation at the time, where Kennedy had his brother as a third general, and on top of this, Bobby Kennedy is an extremely petty man, a man of vengeful mobster character. So here the Soviets saw the greatest opportunity to do away once and for all with all anti-communist factions in America, no more opposition, either to their agents or to the fake right. And of course it's possible, not just possible, likely that they were helped in this by America's own communist deep state. But if you look at Oswald the assassin, the fact is that he was not supposed to have been found. The plan was for the assassination to be blamed on

the hard right, which of course it was anyway, as people just came up with conspiracy theories about why Oswald did not in fact do it. And of course, who was Oswald? He was a guy who lived a Soviet Union, his wife Marina was irration, and this wife Marina gave birth in hospital in Minsk, Belarus. And you know, Warren, who carried out the investigation into JFK assassination, he refused to reveal which floor of Minsk hospital Oswald's wife Marina gave birth on, as there was a special floor there reserved as a privilege for high party members, including especially those trained in the assassin school in Minsk, that's what it was well known for. And Warren refused to let people also ask if Marina had accompanied Oswald to gun shop

in early November, a fact that was only uncovered by foreign investigators by Lord Beaverbrook's granddaughter who had come to the United States to investigate assassination. So you know, actually Oswald was arrested in a cinema, and that's not a coincidence either. It's a perfect spy meeting place. You have reason to be there. It is dark. You can sit next to somebody, trade information or whatever, and people ignore you. So this is not coincidence. He was meeting contacts there for passport and money. People don't realize how close it came to a purge of the American right if Oswald had not been found. And that was not the plan. It was not the plan for him to be found. Warren and Voice of America, which was a communist outlet then as it is now, both of them were

claiming that the American anti-communist right did it, they were trying to blame the assassination on them. So you know, it's one gay psyop astroturf after another, then as now. This is why me and other frog twitter members try to tell you such things and to stop you from getting entrapped by glow niggas in rallies and crimes and such, and other marketing ops because we know the way these faggots work. The things they've done for decades to try to give a pretext for a purge of the patriots. So anyway, I will be right back. Still very tired from this travel. I fell asleep before recording last night. I realize I need my own private zeppelin for travel. I think need own zeppelin dirigible. I must leave a certain kind of style. I need zeppelin balloon with pool, with Cambodian prostitute.

comfortable gold-laced bed not fly in tin can wearing mask. You must resist the wearing of masks. I was wrong before when I tell you they should be worn, or mask law, I'm not sure anymore even that they are effective. And I was in any case only willing to support a temporary mask law if there had been a May 1st reopening. But now they're trying to drag this out for a year or for years where you have medical gear and adult diaper fetishists like Fauci and others who seemingly get off on seeing people humiliated with this, it makes the world ugly, it medicalizes life. And it's furthermore filthy, by the way, because actually germs accumulate on the mask, and people you know, it's fine, maybe as emergency measure for two weeks or a few days,

but long term many people will actually get sick from the masks themselves. But in any case, one peculiarity of Cold War history is the case of Iran, and I just want to give you one brief observation of how Iran was betrayed, how it arrived in this situation where the Shah was overthrown by an alliance of the Islamists and the Communists at the end of Carter presidency, with help, by the way, of both United States and Soviet Union. That's who overthrew the Shah. And I think many are acquainted already with a story told in liberal press about how Mossadegh, a socialist prime minister, was overthrown by the CIA in 1953, I think, and how the Shah was then installed supposedly as an American puppet and so on and so forth, and that the

Iranian revolution to establish Islamic State was a blowback. You hear this word, they like this word, even though, as I keep telling you, the reality is the CIA and State Department have always been communist infiltrated organizations and have relentlessly worked to promote Soviet interests during the Cold War and of something even worse after. They were hardly the nationalist paranoid wasps that made out to be in Ellis Island movies and it was an OSS man. This is precursor to the CIA but it was an OSS man who gave money and weapons to Ho Chi Minh in the 1940s, again, who was a well-known communist agent at the time, and so therefore it was the OSS, the American Intelligence Services, that started the destruction of

Southeast Asia for the next three decades because it was Ho Chi Minh's plan to take over everything from Vietnam to Burma and to turn it into a socialist state based in Vietnam, a kind of Vietnamese communist empire. And he was supported in this endeavor by American organizations from the beginning. This is what I'm telling you. It was American communists working in the OSS and later the CIA, not the Soviets. It was the American intelligence services that instigated massacres of French and other Europeans in Indochina during this time. And when I tell you to look at Iran, in fact, it was the same because the real story is that the Shah Reza Pahlavi, he came to the throne in 1941 and into the 1970s he was actually

beloved by the people with only two exceptions, the Shiite clergy that came to hate him over time. They were religious fanatics who hated that he was taking their right to rule and their stranglehold on much property, although there is a footnote to that. The Shah was forced into that situation. And then the communist students were his other opposition, and you might think that they were supported by the Soviet Union, and they certainly were operational, logistically supported by the Soviets during the riots and so forth, but in fact they were radicalized in the United States. And in the 1970s there are statements from the Shah and his friends in Iran to the effect that students who were sent to study in Moscow, they actually came back anti-communist, but

Iranian students who were sent to study in America came back committed commies radicalized by professors at American universities who are often also CIA agents So, you know the whole pinko commie block in academia That's a CIA nigger thing as well for a long time now and is very interesting because as the king of Cambodia during the 60s And 70s and so on Norodom Sihanouk king of Cambodia She reported exactly the same thing, that the United States was the ground zero for communist radicalization of students in his country as well. Paul Pott, by the way, was a Chinese man, not a Cambodian. And in this connection, you must understand of why the Shah was forced in the 1970s into the positions for which he's often blamed, because he's blamed for causing the revolution for two reasons.

First of all, he's blamed because the secret police he put into place was very repressive and so forth and caused the reaction among the people. Second and more important is the rapid modernizations that he undertook of Iranian society. By the way, I strongly support his approach because he was a neo-pagan and he was bringing back the light of Zoroaster, Shahanshah Aryamer, the light of the Aryans. But it is rightly said that this move drove the Shiite clergy and their supporters into a frenzy. I mean, the Shiite fanaticism was legendary even at the time. It's always been. Sunni Wahhabism hadn't really taken off too much yet. You know, before Sunni Wahhabi movement that really started, let's say, in earnest around

then and in the 80s, most Sunnis were practicing village Islam in which they had a lot of pagan hold over rituals and so forth, and it was only the local Sufi leader who really understood Islamic theology and doctrine, and who was, you could say, a pure doctrinaire Muslim, whereas the average Muslim was practicing a kind of traditional Islam. But the Shiites, you know, as they do as a teenage girl, hand-cutting things, they've always been fanatics, cutting their, you know, cut themselves, but on a mass scale, you know. I'm joking. I should not mix up the two, but in fact it's very terrible and very impressive the way that the Shiites flagellate and scour themselves to remember the martyrdom of their prophet Ali.

And very recently during the Soleimani killing earlier, I think it was in January this year when all of you were convinced that Trump would go to war, but actually nothing came of it. But we saw a Shiite chimp out on social media, and many of us interacted with them a little. You know, they're really insufferable people, self-righteous, self-pitying with the whole martyr thing and martyr complex and all this. So anyway, the Shah, he was not stupid. The Shah was well aware that the modernization program could cause a revolution because a similar program of modernization had led to the fall of the King of Afghanistan in 1929. The King of Afghanistan in 20s also tried to modernize the country rapidly and it fell

apart because of the clergy. They could command tremendous devotion, fanaticism among the people, but the Shah was forced into this program of modernization. This is the point because of immense Soviet pressure. The Soviets were trying and in large part they were succeeding in getting into the Gulf. They wanted the Gulf, the petrol, and they were fast approaching in a pincer movement from north and south of Iran. There was coup in Afghanistan in 1978, April 1978. So from the north there was an advanced, slow stranglehold on Iran, which was the protector of the oil emirates of the Gulf. And from the south, this is what I'm trying to get at here, this is the point, because from the south very few people know the story of what it was that really forced the Shah

into the position he was during the 1970s where he had to take those measures, introduce secret police and all of this. And that, again, is process of decolonization. In particular, the British moving out of Aden, this is Yemen, Yemen port, they're giving up Yemen and that whole area, they moved out of there in 1967, I think. And I used to like quoting Mark Stein on this event, he had very good line about it that England gave up Aden basically without a colonial struggle. There was nothing, there was no colonial war, there was no fight for national self-determination on the part of the Yemenis, it's just that England lost its will and crossed out funding for Aden on a budget form, literally crossed out a line, and that was the end of it, end

of English presence in Aden, this how England decolonized according to Mark Stein in this rather a kind of humdrum bureaucratic measure, but that is not the full story. In fact, there was agitation in Aden that forced England to do this. And guess who caused this agitation? It was an American communist labor organizer named Irving Brown from the Bronx, head of the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions, ICFTU, an international communist organization based in America, funded by millions collected from wages of American workers to foment strikes and to foment unrest in America's allies abroad and to end European colonialism. And in the case of Yemen, Irving Brown from the Bronx and the ICFTU promoted a man named

Alice Nagg, whose party was called the Aidan Trade Union Congress, and through this chapter of the American Socialist International, Brown and his commie friends began massive strikes in Aden that brought that country to a stop. So when, you know, people say that Britain made a budgetary decision because Aden was getting too expensive, this is true in a way, but it's because they had to pay through notes to raise salaries and all of this because Irving Brown organized massive strikes and other agitation, which he did in Africa, many other places where Europeans had presence to kick out Europeans and install communist government. And this move was preceded, by the way, by our friend Kennedy, oh yes, JFK, JFK the blue

dog, populist Democrat, forcing the Shah to break up the biggest states in Iran, which this move obviously alienated both the clergy and the upper class. So what do you think? What JFK putting pressure from the left on an American ally who is in a difficult position? I never. Of course it is impossible, but no, this what happens, this how America destabilized its own allies abroad. But so after English pull out of Yemen, who do you think comes in? It is the Russians, the Cubans and the East Germans. That's who is, that's who moved into Yemen. So you know, there's a bit of misinformation regarding characters like this Irving Brown, Because he fits my stories that I'm telling you on this and other shows entirely.

He is an agent of United States deep state of CIA who goes around the world destroying European civilization and installing communism. But if you look up mainstream lie sources like Wikipedia or mainstream Cold War history books, they will have to readily admit, yes, Irving Brown and Jay Lovestone who was his associate that they were both Jewish communists and they were both working with the CIA. But you know the excuse is always, well, the CIA funded rival labor union movements to counter the Soviet labor unions and to counter other Soviet workers' mobilization measures. So the idea was, let's promote our own anti-communist international socialist left to counter the Soviet international left. And this is always the excuse that it was an anti-communist measure, in fact, and many

people genuinely believe it. Many boomers believe this. They force themselves to believe this, including Steve Saylor, who I love. But Steve Saylor's story about Obama, for example, is that Obama emerges precisely from the CIA-supported international left, Obama's mother being a very successful agent of that world sent to make connections with the left in Pakistan and Indonesia and to make sure in other words that the left in those countries remained at least non-aligned and did not join the Soviets. This is the story, this always excuse for why America seems to support such people or why characters from depths of the Bronx like John, like Irving Brown, excuse me, emerged who had such a destructive effect in the third world, constantly agitating against European

influence, always trying to overthrow European or white rule in these countries. You see some of this also in a rather good movie, I thought, The Quiet American, remade after a book by Graham Greene, with Michael Caine and Brendan Fraser. I thought it was a quite enjoyable movie, and Graham Greene, of course, an anti-American writer, but very entertaining. But this is a story. We want our own left to win, not the Soviets. But here is problem with this argument is not what actually happened in any of these cases ever. In every one of these cases were Irving Brown or similar parties got involved. It was the Soviets or other East Bloc powers who won. Because actually, as an aside, I should tell you, I think I may have mentioned before East

Germany, Cuba, all of these were often far more aggressive than the Soviet Union internationally. And they often pulled the Soviet Union into conflicts abroad where it did not want to be. But Yemen was taken by the East Germans, the Russians and the Cubans. It was not taken by America's own left. Vietnam fell where American labor unions did a similar move, same thing. And many other cases, very same. And in a lot of these places, in fact, there was no leftist movement to speak of before One was funded and organized and started by these American commies. So it isn't like they were responding to a Soviet threat, they were the Soviet threat. Now you see in our own time what the CIA nigger leftism means when you look at the Simeon Brennan,

or at Comey, or at Strzok, who was born in Iran by the way. You see the face, this is it. They are not sophisticated pseudo-leftists, looking to promote America's interests covertly through a shadow socialism. They are, in fact, hardcore pinkos and morons, and I say, communists, please understand what this means. It's not a textbook economic theory. It means they win, you lose. It's not economic theory. It's a civilization overthrow theory. This is what communism is. Their target is the white middle class and the European traditional order, which they seek to overthrow and to replace with an entirely new civilization of which they are the vanguard. By the way, this is where the anti-whiteism of some of these people comes from. Not all of them are anti-white.

You have now dirtbag left in these fakers, but it's the same thing. The purpose is to overthrow what they call European bourgeois civilization, but what is in fact white civilization. And the anti-white thing is not really the point. point is they want the white middle class, or the middle class that happens to be white, to lose its hegemony. So they win. And they've already gotten so far that at times it feels we are fighting a rear-guard action. But I don't think it's quite like that. I think it only feels that way because if you look at Hungary, you can see it's relatively easy for people to awaken and to throw off these vampires. These vampires have patronage networks, they have billionaire support, but actually it's

a thin, very, very thin layer on top of Western societies and they can easily be neutralized. And another interesting aspect of the Shah years is that often today you hear he was beloved by Israel and by the Zionists because he had good relations to them, which perhaps As compared to the regime now in Iran, he did, but this isn't really true. In fact, it was leftist Zionist senators in the United States and in Israel itself that were some of the Shah's most implacable opponents at the time. Little known story, not much talked about now. It was, for example, the four most pro-Israel senators in United States Senate who blocked the sale to Iran of four specialized AWACS airplanes, reconnaissance airplanes very advanced at the time that would have been used to detect any invasion of Iran.

It was a very pro-Israel American leftist editors and academics. International press was viciously anti-Shah in the United States and elsewhere. Only exception possibly was Chile and South Africa, but the international press, which is our chief enemy, remember that, they were the ones who were spurred on the communist riots in Iran. This is despite the fact that Israel received 80% of its oil from Iran, but nevertheless it was the left, the Zionist left that stomped for Israel that was the most viciously against the Shah. So not quite the case you may have heard. And finally, of course, the Najab Khomeini, he took over and he had been supported by international left and Soviets the whole time. The fact that he later turned against them, possibly once he came to power, isn't really

the point here, but he couldn't have come to power without communist support, which of course entirely, what I'm telling you here, the purpose of communist push internationally is to destroy every last base of pro-European support or every pro-American leader. And again, pro-American in being on the side of American nation as a whole, or the American people. I don't mean the cartel impersonating it. And Khomeini came, I think, even with CIA nigger Foucault supporting him. Oh yes, that's right, Michel Foucault supported Khomeini. But that's for another time. I discuss another time, I must rest. Now remember, world has been fisted by Foucault, fisted by Fauci. Maybe soon American patriots awaken, I think they might, I think they will be ready to

be led by certain champions of the people, maybe from among you. Cola di Rienzi, you look him up, Wagnerian hero, listen to Rienzi overture. I will talk Cola di Rienzi, Italian medieval tribune of the people on the next or future show. BAP out.