Caribbean rhythm episode 42, Bronze Age pervert, episode 42, 1942, Stalingrad. I may do a show on such siege, siege of Stalingrad, but will not be now. I want talk so-called security in Seattle autonomous zone, shoot people. You see this today, three weeks into establishing police-free zone, they are shooting black Like teens, teenagers bragging about it on social media, too. The security goons who shot people, they are claiming they were having a paranoid fantasy that it was the chuds they were shooting at. And that the word chud, this is a retired lefty name for right wingers, I think. And they're claiming they're shooting chuds who are there to be wreckers to the Bantu Cabbage Patch Garden of Seattle, Wakanda.

They were saying they were chuds, they were driving an SUV to drive by, it's completely delusional. So get this, Loki Julianus, who is the man, right? So here, Loki Julianus uncovers this security guy for Seattle-Vakanda region that you look up their names and they were volunteers in the YPG, which is a Kurdish, mostly militia in Syria, recent civil war, they are commies. So you remember Chris Hitchens, he want to go to war against Saddam Hussein because of a long-standing alliance of international left with the PKK. This is a socialist nationalist, not to be confused apparently with national socialist, but the socialist nationalist Kurdish party that is analog to Basque socialist nationalist ETA and perhaps to PLO, but the YPG, this Kurdish militia in Syria, you can think of

it roughly as similar to they were taking Western leftist volunteers who fought there under the Antifa flag. So let's say you redo Spanish Civil War, but gay. So the Antifa flag, as you know, is a flag of militia of Social Democrat Party Weimar Germany, 1930s, 1920s, opposed both the communists and the Nazis. So you know, a lot of American neocon group is entirely aligned with this. This is what they pride on. We oppose both the communists and the Nazis. Many come straight out of the Antifa social democrat tradition. But the point is now that you have known direct links between the leftoids who are providing muscle to Antifa in the United States, if you can call it muscle, but they're providing literally guns and security to Antifa.

And now you can see it's directly connected to paramilitary group YPG. So now Barr and Trump, they should have a relatively easy time making the case that terrorist organization? I think so. So you know at the very least now they can pursue this. They can make public this argument and maybe they can round up at least the middle leadership under some kind of terror ordinance. I don't know but are you listening? The feds who are assigned to monitor my brutal paganism are you listening? You should get a life and go hunt real terrorists. Now is your chance. Of course, the flip side of this is what? Then it's easy if you are a western lefty to go fight Kurdish militia in Syria and if you are fighting ISIS and you have United States

providing air cover and so-called intelligence and logistics and other kinds of support or they are arming you, now I ask you what is the flip side? Think it, what kind of people are these? And if they were not to begin with, then later they will become filthy glow-in-the-dark, bioluminescent Central Intelligence Agency niggers. If they didn't go into Syria to play act being in a left militia as glow niggers, they became radioactive as time went on. They were recruited later, without a doubt. As it is said, they send the left-passing glow niggers to Syria and the right-passing ones to to Ukraine to become paramilitaries. They get training, then they come back in the United States. Just like it was uncovered, the leader Norman Speer of some paramilitary neo-Nazi organization

exposed as a federal agent who was training in Afghanistan or Ukraine, I forget which. But this is how it happened. And let's face it, the people running CIA are not bright. They are ambitious, but they are low IQs, they are self-important, so you think maybe not James Bond, but you think Victoria Nuland, some kind of housewife on SSRIs with delusions that she's Metternich, or that she's playing the great game, or some creature like this, these typical running ups for the CIA. So you remember station chief Beirut, yes, some creature with delusions like this hears of a Redditor with grids who went to volunteer in Syria. So then they recruit such people, they say, there's somebody after my taste, I recruit

them and begin incestuous relationship, that after a while it's hard to tell who is in control. You might remember how in Afghanistan, the Kabul CIA station chief, she was a housewife, very much like this, and she ended up getting a lot of people killed and getting herself blown up because her trusted source of long time was in fact an enemy, the so-called Al-Qaeda. So America ended up droning a lot of its allies in Afghanistan because the person providing the Kabul station chief with intel was an enemy. So you know, let's get the Americans to kill our enemies. This was the idea and it worked. For years America destroyed its own allies in that region. But this is professionalism level of people who just act out what they see on TV. They act out West Wing and born identity and this.

So what I'm saying is given that the Antifa security in Seattle are ex-YPG volunteers for this Kurdish militia leftist from Syria, and therefore they are surely glow niggers or glow nigger associated, where does the CIA support for CHAS Wakanda zone begin and And where does it end? And I'm not saying it's all planned on direct orders from somebody like Victoria Nuland as a centralized color revolution, although it's possible because it's exactly what they did in Ukraine and other places, but could it be some faction or small group from CIA? And more important, can Trump and friends use this connection that doubtless can be established here between the riots and the intelligence community? Then he used this as a pretext to start cleaning house, because he needed to do something to

stop insanity gripping America. It's being spun and gangbanged between the rolling lockdowns on one hand, the Wuhan flu lockdowns on the other, the gloniger riots, and it's going to be yo-yo like this. It's going to spun like this until election and everything is in complete chaos. And only solution, like I say on last show, is to go after the leadership, or now they may actually be doing this in a way quietly. I heard, I'm not sure, that there have been up to 500 arrests recently on federal or riot charges or similar. So Barr, he may be doing something. But I wonder, even if this works, and let's say they are quietly arresting the middle leadership of the riots and then the disturbances start to sizzle out, to pitter out, will it be satisfying enough for the potential Trump voter?

Because actually, people are very angry, they want retribution. They see a big profile arrest, they might be satisfied, but if things just end up quietly going away, I don't know. I'd say maybe if Trump able to stop riots and re-establish some normal life by the fall, he will still do well in election, even if he doesn't give people this emotional release. But emotional release is an important thing. After World War II, there was emotional release on the streets, a declaration of victory, there were parades. But these crises this year have actually affected average citizen daily life far more than World War II, in America at least, far more than any war, I'd say, maybe even in Europe, far more than any event, and there's nothing like this in the last 200, 300 years or really

Really anything I can think of where daily life changed so much and so fast, where people were put under these extreme tyrannical restrictions like house arrest for months, and then the terror of having to see their cities burned down, mobs menacing them directly. In many cases, they cannot go downtown of their own cities. I suppose you'd have to go into darkest page of barbarian invasions or sackings of Rome, Mongol second to see anything similar to what every person has experienced in the last few months in terms of daily lives affected, which is a great event of history of last 200 years. They did not affect daily life so much, I repeat. So even the world war, world wars generally leave them alone as the private deprivations of war are not so great as this with house arrest.

So I think after this there will be some emotional release necessary to go with end of this terror. And for this, if Trump cannot arrest leadership of Antifa and parade Alexander Soros in chains before a jeering crowd, then at least I suggest he make good on his 2015 campaign promise for girlfriends for frogs. Can I at least get a groupie out of this? So now finally, if you saw on my account, I post some photos. They sent two or three hot top body, I don't see the face, maybe butter face, I don't know, but top body hot fat girls, they sent them after me. Now they're coming out of nowhere posting with my book. So that's okay. Can I at least get a blowjob out of this? Finally they're sending their best toward me. I've made it to the big leagues.

I'm no longer getting harassed by fat federally papists. I am getting pursued by nubile woman feds. You get the feds you fucking deserve. I will be right back. I'm in fact looking at the mountain as a record show. I'm not making this up, and there is a majestic cloud rolling over the mountain. It's very romantic, but also frighten me. I have had a nightmare lately about imminent volcano eruption, And there is, in fact, a volcano here, Grimsvotn, I think is called, that is set to erupt soon. And something legend dreams is drawing me there. I feel drawn like moth to fire. I may go there soon and record for you a message from edge of volcano. Many of you, you know the historian, Thucydides. And I actually think this writer, Thucydides, is a bit overdone.

For example, if you take international relations course in a college, by the way, Obongo say I think that he was running for president and he say that he had experience in foreign affairs because he took course on international relations. It's like when you meet girl who indignantly informed college courses, they talk when you don't want to listen to their blather, they tell you, I took college courses on this. But if you look at this and many other kinds of courses, it's standard to begin with Thucydides' history book, because international relations are seen as the origin of realism theory in international relations, or otherwise in a theory of balance of power. And this, they always introduce it with the study of Thucydides. And I find this a little boring.

There is now a talk also of a so-called Thucydides' Trap. You may have heard lately. For example, if you listen to Bannon, Steve Bannon of War Room podcast, where I think he attack this idea of Thucydides' Trap, what is it? His idea promoted by someone named Graham Allison, apparently, who is some kind of dour, wretched, apparatchik from the Clinton administration. And he say that when one established great power is threatened by another, you usually get... get a war. And he calls this the Thucydides Trap, because in Thucydides' history, one book is called the history, you know, Peloponnesian Way. He says a big cause of the war was that Sparta was feeling threatened by Athens' rise. Okay, but the reason this is annoying is because,

look, I'm not going to read that book or other book like it. Life is very short to read such book, but... So maybe I miss special insights that this apparatchik Ellison has, but there is something common sense can tell you, that when one power is rising, another big one is established, you might get war. A small child can predict this. So why you need to put names Thucydides on it? Thucydides' trap to sound, you know. So Bannon speak of this in context of China, and how the establishment zoglings like Graham Allison, who, by using this concept of Thucydides' trap, they mean to say that China is rising, United States is declining dominant power, and the trap, or in other words, war, must be avoided at all costs.

And therefore, they conclude that there is always a therefore, you know, therefore America must allow China a gracious and peaceful rise, and in other words, to pass the baton peacefully, give up hegemony peacefully. And of course, this is absurd. It doesn't get better if you put ancient Greek name on it and abandon his arguments against it. But, you know, actually Sparta won that war, so I don't understand what is the trap. And by the way, Sparta was right to win the war and to declare war because Athens rise, I suppose in this model is presented as something organic and inevitable, something like seasons coming or one plant and then another plant, but when in fact you see Thucydides' description of how Athens rose to challenge Sparta, Athens' rise was based on hubris, on grasping, on

depriving other Greeks of their ancient liberties, which Sparta rightly rose up to defend, and this cause of Peloponnesian War. So now for those who need a quick refresher on what all this mean and whose Thucydides was, he was Greek general during Peloponnesian War, the second part of the 400s BC. A great multi-decade war between Athens and Sparta that broke out after the Greeks defeated the Persians in the 480s and 470s, although in reality skirmishes and minor battles against West Persia continued after that, in many ways indefinitely after that. But in the wake of the victory over the Persians, the Greeks no longer had great external enemies, so they turned on each other. And so it was Athens, the democracy, versus Sparta, the aristocracy, fighting for a hegemony over the Greek world.

And in reality, this meant a huge part of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea and such. And Thucydides was Athenian general of half-Thracian descent. The Thracians, you know, live in modern Bulgaria, that region, and they were a barbarian tribe with red hair, primarily. And he wrote a great history book, considered sometime the second history book after Herodotus, or by some it's considered the first real history book because they say Herodotus is still a mythologer. But in any case, it's very different from Herodotus, who I've talked about a lot more before both on this show and on my account, and I always tell people, I recommend you read Herodotus, because I think overall he has, well, first of all, he's less done.

He's less read than Thucydides in these whack-a-mole, I guess whack-a-mole is not the word, cockamamie, what is word? I don't know. The fog from the mountain interfering with me. But these kind of college courses, you know, pile drive into you, they begin to see these things. They don't cover Herodotus so much, so you should read him on your own. And his book, Herodotus History, is crazier, it's more exotic, it presents for you the remarkable strangeness of ancient world with its variety of peoples who are so much more different from each other than any modern species of man are from each other, including I've posted this a number of times, but he said the Ethiopians and the subcon Indians both have black seed. What does this mean?

Or how there were giant one-footed men in India who use the foot as umbrella in the hot sun to shield themselves from sun. And he talked also of a giant ant that mine gold, they carry gold out of the earth for some people. talk also of cannibal tribes in the steppe. All of these things are absolutely true. I recommend for you this book, Herodotus History. He talked about how the Egyptians peed, urinated, sitting down like women, and how they practiced circumcision. It's interesting. He say like the Colchis, who are people who lived roughly where present-day Georgia nation is on the coast of Black Sea. And he says they are descended from the Egyptians, the Colchis, and he says this phrase, and I know they are descended from the Egyptians. They're a colony of the Egyptians, the Colchis now,

not only because they are swarthy and curly-haired, because many others are so, he means something like Arab-looking, but because they, too, practice circumcision. And this is how he judges dissent from Egyptians. Greeks found this practice of circumcision, they found it ridiculous, and rightly so. And they had images, cartoons, you could think, of Egyptians with such cock. It's very insulting to the Egyptians. And so now you realize in America, you've been inducted into ancient Masonic cult, where women and men in aprons cut off a slice of your dicks and they do it as a mock sacrifice to their hidden god, which they worship inside a black box. I'm not allowed to talk this, where you go to Buenos Aires or Montevideo, Uruguay, and everywhere like Washington, D.C., you see a giant obelisk.

What this has to do with liberal democracy and Bill of Rights, the obelisk, and the republican federalism and English common law. What has to do with obelisk? Please tell me. In every used bookstore, Uruguay has giant Masonic tomes. This whole new world was, all of the political arrangement in the world are filthy, masonic conspiracy projects, which is why these countries are all being punished now, they're being punished by the gods with decay, with decay of all elements of social life, with bigotry, decay of the family, of the boundaries of the individual itself, of the human body, which is disfigured by obesity. And this is the punishment that debased new world so-called democracies, this is the punishment

at the high hand of nature for being Masonic masturbation projects, the obese black trannies that are now broadcast as totem images from American embassies. What do you think of that? This degeneration, this negritude of which this spread to the rest of the world as this Helped to spread a wuhabi Islam in the decades before so you see now The wuhabi Islam that this same government spread now They spread black you see the grand alliance of the masons with the fake religions The deranged offspring and all of the subsorts that have come out of that Which only served the middlemen of the Middle East in their pee stained robes and urinated thoughts hearts, and which have worked eternally they have worked for one and only to be a bridge

of apefrica into europe and into the heart of the great earth sea, and we will never allow this, and one day a solar king will come who will persecute with great severity and great glory these humus mangers, the great real king of the kalachakra tantra, the great the emissary of Aldebaran Godubrej, great historian of conflict, Peloponnesian War, which bled dry the Greek world of the high classical period. So you can see classical period definitely ends with rise of Alexander the Great in the 330s BC, but the Peloponnesian War in the 400s BC exhausted all the energies of the Greek world. It led to the end of this phase of Greek civilization. This is what gave opening to Macedonians and to Alexander, the British cousins of the Greeks, who then used great advances in military knowledge

of these people and their own innovations to spread Greek culture by conquest all to India and to establish a Hellenistic so-called world that was itself the precondition of the Roman world. And therefore, ultimately, you could say of ours, if you accept that provenance, as opposed to Spengler, who say, no, the Western world was a separate civilization that arose in the year 1000 in West Europe. This also makes sense. And Thucydides is, like I said, somewhat overdone in commentary, in books, in academia, so I don't like to talk things that are overdone, But one famous passage in Thucydides is very timely, where he talks about the Korsiran Revolution, or the Korsiran Civil War on Korsaira, the Greek island, now known as Khorshu.

If you're interested, you can read this almost as a standalone in Book 3 of Thucydides, basically chapter 69 to about 84. And do not worry about translation. You can just assume all translations of Thucydides are, at best, renditions. Thucydides was very hard to read, even for native Greek speakers. He's a very mysterious writer. For example, you have commentaries on Thucydides by people like Dionysius of Halicarnassus. This man Dionysius was simply a writer, a commentator, who lived much later than Thucydides, four hundred years after him. So let's say Thucydides lived 400 BC, this commenter lived 1st century BC, right before birth of Christ, but he was a very deep student of ethnic Greek style, Dionysius of Halicarnassus,

and yet he sometimes admits he doesn't understand Thucydides, what he's saying, his language, his grammar. He has paragraphs very hard to parse, he's very dense. So there aren't any really great translations, but you should read it anyway. Thomas Hobbes has a translation, and you can see these sections stand alone, especially chapters 80 onward of book 3, which I will read for a bit on you here, but the general context is, so this book about conflict between Athens and Sparta, but really it became a war within the entire Greek world. Almost every Greek city and state was touched by it because each city had a faction of the people and a faction of the rich or of the oligarchs, or the aristocrats in some cases, the many versus the few.

And each Greek city was divided this way and these were at odds in great conflict and with coming of the war between Sparta and Athens, they could each call on one hegemon or the other for help. So, for example, in Korsaira, the popular faction called on Athens, and the oligarchic faction called on Sparta and Corinth, and both sent reinforcements. But you can see how this same thing would happen in almost every Greek city, where these latent political rivalries in vendetta with each other. The Greek word for this, neikos, is the same as the Norse word nade. It's very old Indo-European, same thing, blood-fueled. But this strong blood-fueled between almost the oligarchic party and the popular party in every Greek city, you could say.

So let me just say here that this is why I think along with some very few others that in fact what Sousa Didi is describing and what Peloponnesian War really is, is not about rising power versus declining power, is not about balance of power, is not about series of realism in international relations or any such thing. It's not merely a political event, but is a manifestation of spiritual moment in the Greek or Hellenic soul, you could say, Greek or Hellenic spirit, because otherwise it couldn't have happened this way that it's reproduced in every Greek state across the Mediterranean almost. So it has rather the character you could think of, it's like a cultural fad, or even a religion. It spreads the same way.

Strange to think of it this way, a religion, but yes, a religion of the lust for blood and for destruction, the self-destruction and self-annihilation of the Greek world in a frenzy of fire. This is what I believe Bokeh is about. And Thucydides often talk in this book of the lust for power or for sovereignty and for rule, the lust for archae, to rule. And I think this was a secret key to Greek spirit. You know, I say this in books, it's not a mystery, I didn't make it up, that secret meaning of Bronze Age mindset is desire to become a god. This was desire of every Greek, this is very explicit. I like how some of the boomer conservatives latched onto that phrase to say that I somehow promote the millennial immorality of the millennials who are nihilists, as if you can tell they

do not understand a Greek spirit. This is where Nietzsche learned it from because it was the most frank, naïve embrace of the lust for power, the Greeks. The lust to excel over your rivals. That's what it means to defeat, to see your enemy at your feet defeated. Beyond any other people's, the Greeks, as men of nature, they went back to nature in this as well and they pursued the lust for rule and for victory down to the smallest nook of the smallest provincial town, where each faction ended up falling upon every other small faction in all areas of life, great and small. Something ended up being consumed by this final fire of the Greek spirit in a civil war that tore itself apart in blood. You see this in many famous parts of Suseidides' book, but most of all in Revolution on Corcyra.

So I say to you, Corcyra is Corfu, a relatively larger island in Adriatic Sea of the northwest coast of Greece. It was a Venetian and then a British possession more recently, so I think it has some nice British architecture. I've never been there, but there is a ferry boat from Bari in Italy and I hope to be able to see it someday. That is if the world will ever recover from being wrecked by the globalists and the chinks, but it's supposed to be very beautiful Corfu. Many artists and painters of great power came from there. Beautiful Adriatic green-blue sea. But in ancient history, it was originally a colony of Corinth, which was a rich Greek commercial city-state, and they founded this corsaira, I think, in the 700s BC on the island.

But it was always in tension with its mother city, Corinth, they were never friends. I tell you a story about this in the book, about the tyrant Periander, Superman of Corinth, who had all the boys on Corfu castrated in his madness for revenge. This is well before Peloponnesian War, but by time of Peloponnesian War, it was like other Greek cities, Corcyra, it was divided between the party of the people and the party of the oligarchy, with the people's faction having in this case the upper hand. And both Sparta in essence sent reinforcements to their respective allies, but the best part of this account is at the end where Thucydides, having described the frights and the massacres and the counter-massacres of this revolt, he starts to talk something very strange about

how this same thing was reproduced in the Greek world at large, and what it meant spiritually, as a turn in the Greek spirit, not just a political event. And I will come back to read from the book, and you then tell me if it sounds familiar, or if you think it will be something familiar very soon in the Western world. I was thinking about particular problem history in Nazism and how it is that Nazism was defeated from outside. But after 1945, Marxism and what you may call liberalism or whatever you want to call this system in the West right now, both of them unfolded on their own without external restriction so much, except I guess each other, but both really fell internally, whereas Nazism did not. And this very interesting problem in history that I will do as a show on, because it is

as if 1789 French Revolution did not succeed, Napoleon did not succeed, and it was squashed, which it was. But long term, the French Revolution and Napoleon exerted a greater fascination both on the arts and on politics than the victors against them. And I predict it's going to be very similar with Nazism. I'm sorry to tell those of you who are anti-Nazi, including me. I am anti-Nazi. I am liberal. But I think historical analogy is true, and I will defend this on later show. It's unrelated to what we're talking about, really. I was just thinking during break. But I will read for you now a rendering of Thucydides' account of a revolution at Korsaira, and I will jump around a bit because it's long. But this is from chapters 81 through 84 from book three.

I'm quoting him now, during the seven days that Urimedon stayed with his sixty ships, the Korsirians were engaged in butchering those of their fellow citizens whom they regarded as their enemies. This is he's talking about the Democratic Party now protected by a kind of Athenian reinforcements, so now they are butchering the oligarchic party. And he continues, Although the crime imputed was that of attempting to put down the democracy, some were slain also for private hatred, others by their debtors because of the monies owed to them. Death thus raged in every shape, and as usually happens at such times, there was no length to which violence did not go. were killed by their fathers and suppliers dragged from the altar or slain upon it, while

some were even walled up in the temple of Dionysus and died there. So bloody was the march of the revolution, and the impression which it made was the greater as it was one of the first to occur. Later on, one may say, the whole Hellenic world was convulsed, struggles being everywhere made by the popular chiefs to bring in the Athenians and by the oligarchs to introduce the Spartans, in peace, would have been neither the pretext nor the wish to make such an invitation, but in war, with an alliance always at the command of either faction, for the hurt of their adversaries and their own corresponding advantage, opportunities for bringing in the foreigner were never wanting to the revolutionary parties. The sufferings which revolution entailed upon the cities were many and terrible, such as

have occurred and always will occur as long as the nature of mankind remains the same. Though in severer or milder form and varying bla- I cannot read for you everything, so I jumped, he said, revolution thus ran its course from city to city, and the places which it arrived at last, from having heard what had been done before, carried to a still greater excess the refinement of their inventions as manifested in the cunning of their enterprises and the atrocity of their reprisals. Words had to change their ordinary meaning and to take that which was now given them. Remember this very important phrase. Words had to change their usual meaning. Reckless audacity came to be considered the courage of a loyal ally. Prudent hesitation was considered specious cowardice.

Moderation was held to be a cloak for unmanliness. And so forth. Anyway, it continues like that, and then he has these powerful lines. The cause of all these evils was the lust for power arising from greed and ambition, and from these passions proceeded the violence of parties once engaged in Kebalah. So the leaders in the cities, each provided with the fairest professions, made on one side the cry for political equality of the people, they professed this as their principle, And on the other side of a moderate aristocracy, they sought prizes for themselves in those public interests in which they pretended to cherish, and recoiling from no means in their struggles for ascendancy, they engaged in their direct excesses.

And in their acts of vengeance they went to even greater lengths, not stopping at what justice or the good of the state demanded, but making the party caprice of the moment their only standard, and invoking with equal readiness the condemnation of an unjust verdict or the authority of the strong arm to glut the animosities of the hours." Yes, so end quote. So you see, does this sound familiar, where words change meaning, end up meaning the opposite or end up meaning nothing, where party leaders end up using pompous notions of justice to hide their lusts for power and for blood and revenge? Many times these chapters in Thucydides are interpreted as a kind of hand-wringing way, as in, oh, look how morality is debased in civil war or in war, how evil overtakes good,

or how good people are driven to evil in evil times, and this. And then some others take the extra step of saying, well, this is actually an example of a re-evaluation of values, of what Nietzsche means when he talks about this, how a class or a religion, or in this case, as they would have it, an event, a war, how it manages to upturn the previous morality and change it. So I think this is all wrong. Thucydides says much more than this. He says what I just tell you, that words are in fact worthless, abstractions are worthless. Even in peace, these things, justice, morality, religion, are artifices of men, not only to hide this lust for power, but somehow to screw it in place, to make it such that a priestly

class in the extreme example, or various analogous classes of people in lesser cases, at the very least those who are agile with words and with abstractions, to make them the arbiters of good and bad, who are then able to use these kinds of magic formulas as weapons of spiritual warfare. And yet the warfare is never on behalf of justice or any such things, but on behalf of human types, of biological types. This is the point. This you see also arising in our time, although the pitch of the insanity has not yet risen to full violence. You see sporadic violence, controlled violence, probably under the direction of Gloneggars and CIA inside the big cities, but it has not spread to the level Thucydides talked about, where each American city would be in conflagration.

But if you want to see example of that, you look Argentina in 1970s in Buenos Aires where you had daily assassinations on the streets. Sometimes the left would assassinate an economics professor or they would assassinate CEO of a company or representative of American company. And then eventually you had a right wing reprisal squads which assassinated labor leaders and such. So, this kind of quarrel, you see the birth of it already in America now, and the soon future of America can be what I just talked about. It's not really comparable to the time of troubles of America in 1960s and 70s, because in those times not so many people died, whereas in Argentina it was very much like what I just read for you from Thucydides. Daily murders, students killing this and that, reprisals.

But see how societies continue, I have to jump around, you must read the whole thing on your own. But he say, every form of, I'm quoting him now, every form of inequity took place in Hellenic countries by reason of the troubles. The ancient simplicity into which honor so largely entered was left down and disappeared. And society became divided into camps in which no man trusted his fellow. To put an end to this, there was neither promise to be depended on nor oath that could command respect. But all parties, dwelling rather in their calculation upon the hopelessness of a permanent state of things, were more intent upon the self-defence than capable of confidence. And he continues later, he says this very important thing.

In the confusion into which life was now thrown in the cities, human nature, always rebelling against the law and now its master gladly showed itself ungoverned in passion, above respect for justice, and the enemy of all distinction, since revenge would not have been set above religion and gain above justice had it not been for the fatal power of envy." Again, does this sound familiar? But aside from this, where envy by the way also has the meaning of just not wanting to see your enemies to be more esteemed or more in power than you, and in that sense it can apply to both the superior and the inferior. But this is the phrase where he says, more important than this, is the phrase where he says human nature is always trying to exceed the bounds of law.

Human nature hears this inherently in its character to destroy the laws. So you see, he agrees that all the laws and all notions of justice are outside human nature, which seeks only power, only esteem over others, only to excel over others, only the drive to destroy one's enemies, to see them defeated. It is only that the Greeks were more honest than other men in this regard, they were more honest than you for sure, but even then barbarians, who you may think are actually like this, but they are very rarely in fact able to frankly live in the world of truth and fact. We see among us now where the Martinets like Hillary Clinton and Podesta and BLM, and then also people on GOP establishment side too, they want nothing but the same and are motivated

by envy, by the lust for revenge, by power and greed. And the reason they hate the hard right or the new right, call it what you will, the nationalists, the reason they hate Trump is because he make a mockery of the thin pretty lies under which they hide their shame for this lust for power. It's also why they hate me, by the way. If I do something in my account, it is to frankly restate what you think maybe as barbaric, but which is really the Greek lust for life and for eminence and for superiority. Which because I'm frank about it and because I'm not a subhuman motivated by subterranean desires for revenge, but rather all my desires are in the open like a dog, but these great completely embarrasses them, because what I talk about as artistic desire or as longing

even for blood, they actually live out as a tawdry parody. Let me give you an example. You may have heard Ben Rhodes, I think it was, a bongo advisor. I'm sorry to turn to such dwarf creatures, but I think it was him, and if it wasn't him, it was somebody equivalent to Ben Rhodes. I think only two years ago, maybe it was 2016, but he held a major position in US government, Whoever did this, it was a guy in State Department, I think, with major position. And he's challenging Putin on Twitter. And he's challenging Putler to judo, to judo match. Now you might think it's a cute joke, but it was not joke if you saw it. I'm not saying it was 100% serious, but it affected this man on a deep emotional primal level to make this challenge.

And my point is, these people are deeply moved by things like Putin's shirtless photographs. Now for those of you who don't know, Putin some time ago took shirtless photos of himself hunting or fishing or riding a horse. And that was more than 10 years ago and it was understood in Russia as good fun. I mean, nobody worships putler and nobody thought, oh, he's a handsome, thirsty specimen or a strong man to be worshipped. It was just some kind of red-blooded Russian LARPing, you could say, in good fun. But this upset the demons in the State Department and all such people. So more than you can imagine it upset them. I mean even because for them they are actually humorless and they took it to be an assault

on their manhood to see putler like that and this man also humiliates them because he outwitted them in their tawdry intelligence games. It's also why they have a fixation by the way on special forces. That's why you have shit-lib politicians and people like Farkas and Ben Rhodes. They have a hard-on for special forces guys. They're always seeking this strange approval from special forces men. It's actually very homosexual, but it all comes from the fact these are kind of womanlike species that they always feel are concerned with power. So even many years later, Putin has long trained for judo as part of his KGB background. That is why. But even so many years later, after his photographs, you have American shit-lit diplomats who have

a manhood crisis in public and try to act out on Twitter, challenging heads of state to wrestling and this, you know, next they will chat, winner they call wrestling and I don't want to get graphic, it's family show, but it's the same kind of power fantasy that leads to things like Superman comic, deranged. And instead, the frank expression of admiration for superiority that you see in my Twitter account, it turns such subterranean power worshippers into drooling retards full of rage against me, because I both expose what is in their spirits, and at the same time I expose what is petty about them, the smallness of their envies, their shortcomings. It's also why fat obese Thomists hate me. These are federally papists, they hate me. I will be right back with one more thing.

I want to end this show on Revolution Korsaira by reading for you important passage from Nietzsche again, his early book, Human All Too Human, where he actually, he mentioned Revolution Korsaira. The title of the aphorism is Vanity as an Antisocial Aftergrowth. And he say, I'm quoting Nietzsche now, Vanity as an Antisocial Aftergrowth. as men, for the sake of security, have made themselves equal in order to found communities. But as also this conception is imposed by a sort of constraint and is entirely opposed to the instincts of the individual, so the more universal security is guaranteed, the more the new offshoots of the old instincts for predominance appear. Such offshoots appear in the setting up of class distinctions, in the demand for professional

dignities and privileges, and, generally speaking, in vanity, manners, dress, speech, and so forth. Think of hipsters affecting intellect accoutrements, like nerd style with thick glasses. Anyway, I continue with Dichina. So soon as the danger to the community is apparent, the majority, who are unable to assert their preponderance in a time of universal peace, once more bring about the condition of equality when danger comes. And for the time being, the absurd privileges and vanities disappear. If the community, however, collapses utterly and anarchy reigns supreme, there arises the state of nature, an absolutely ruthless inequality as recounted by Thucydides in the case of Corcyra. Neither a natural justice nor a natural injustice exists." Does this sound familiar to you?

Well, in nature, there is neither justice nor injustice, but there is strict hierarchy and superiority and inferiority. What does this mean then? Nietzsche say another place that Thucydides spoke more between the lines than any other writer and I'm not trying to be coy with you, but it means that Thucydides knew that human nature is pure, undifferentiated. That's right, this is what Thucydides knew, that this greedy desire, especially a desire to best others and to vanquish enemies who pose resistance, that this is the true force inside man, the entirety of his true spirit, as also it is the spirit of animal and of forest and even of the rock face. He understood this, and here is what else Nietzsche say about Thucydides in his early book called The Dawn or Daybreak.

He talk here about Thucydides and why he's important, why he's superior to Plato. I'm quoting Nietzsche now, a model. What is it I love in Thucydides? Why do I honor him more highly than Plato? He takes the most comprehensive and impartial delight in all that is typical in men and all that is typical in events, and believes that to each type there pertains a quantum of good sense. This he seeks to discover. He displays greater practical justice than Plato. He does not revile or belittle those he does not like or who have harmed him in life. On the contrary, through seeing nothing but types, he introduces something great into all things, and into all persons he treats of, by treating them as types. For what interests would posterity, to whom he dedicates this book, have in that which

was not typical? Thus in him the portrayer of men, that culture of the most impartial knowledge of the world, finds its last glorious flower, that culture which had in Sophocles its poet, in Pericles its statesman, in Hippocrates its physician, in Democritus its natural philosopher, which deserves to be baptised with the name of its teachers, the Sophists, and which from this moment of baptism unfortunately begins suddenly to become pale and ungraspable to us, for now we suspect that it must have been a very immoral culture since Plato and all the Socratic schools fought against it. Truth is here so tangled and twisted one does not like the idea of trying to sort it out. Let the ancient error continue to run its ancient course.

That is a little bit mysterious ending I will discuss perhaps some other time, but he's saying Thucydides, Sophocles are the height of Greek culture, of Greek spirit and Greek intellect, and what you see today as Plato and Socrates not, meaning that you won't see through pure Hellenic spirit. You read Thucydides, not Plato, a man whose noble nature – I speak of Plato now – he was born noble nature and a great wrestler, but he was corrupted by Socrates, who was – I have said before what he was, I cannot repeat here, but it's possible – I introduce now a new amazing idea – it's possible Socrates was what in Iceland is called hildefolk, hidden folk, descended from various pygmy crossbreeds. Like you see the Flores men, a pygmy dwarf on an Indonesian island, possibly with psionic powers.

But then also Plato studied in Egypt and possibly in Egypt with the Masonic sect of the Jews. So you see how his life, and I don't know how it's possible by the way to read Plato, you cannot read him without taking speed. You need to take methamphetamine to... his lies are so blatant and tedious, but he makes the world really ready to receive Africa via the Masonic project. This is what Plato does. In fact, the Greeks discovered America by sea, by ocean, and much else. But I leave this speculation for next time. I still have to tell you about the greatness of Buddhism and why it is connected to what I said so far about moment in spiritual history of a people where a great conflagration comes. And Buddhism must be understood this way. That is the second part of this show.

I must talk to you next time of Buddhism, of how it can be used as a tonic to dissolve the pretty lies, and of why many great men in the past have been fascinated by the idea of European Buddhism. What it means, where it comes from, what the future holds under a Buddhist military dictatorship that I establish with friends, as the Chakravartin, the real king. Until next time, Al-Dehbaran glory, BAP out!