Russia is basically Africa is what I, yes, hello, please cut the music, I say something. Russia is really kind of Africa, is frozen Africa, is dysfunctional shithole. Now when they become famous recently for beautiful women, and also they stand up to New World Order, and I like them and promote them for this when I can, but the country itself is shithole. Look at a YouTube video called Driving in Russia, Everyday Driving in Russia. See what it's like. It's a whole genre of funny so-called videos, but imagine what life's like every day for people there trying to get to work. And of course, if in liberal minds there's anything more uncool and authoritarian than Russia, that would be maybe Nazi Germania, I don't know.

But Russia is, you'd think, even the antipodes, the complete opposite of the shit lib, of the hippie, of the leftist academic, and why I say this? Because Russia is certainly an uncivilized place. This is what I mean, is African, Russia is African, that's part of its charms, such as they are, to me at least, and yet if you look at what is ideal of a leftist mind, the University of New York, the establishment journalists alike, they idolized the 1960s and they see the hippies and the anti-civilizationist liberationist message of the hippies as it's one of their guide lights, one of their shining pads and yet when it comes to actually uncivilized place like Russia, especially Russia, I mean but other two, it's just Satan to them and

And you might think they give a pass to non-white third world and its savagery and obscurantism, and to some extent they do, but only in theory. In practice, for example, when the faggotized cook Anthony Bourdain, infamy, hello, infamy, infamy Bourdain, when he went to some god-forsaken African hole, maybe Congo, I don't know, He saw the darkness of cannibal nature in faith, and he couldn't accept it. Hardis talks about this, and how he tried to blame it on Whitey and on colonialism and this, and that's always their cope. Whitey really did it, but he didn't accept it, nor do they accept Viratu in Burma, who is a person of color, nor many other in third world. So it's not that they don't give a pass.

They try to say Whitey is ultimately responsible, like they did, I told you last show, they try to blame Rwanda genocide also on Belgian colonial heritage, complete fantasy. But you know, Bourdain could not deal with this. The average shit lib, they can't accept even the third world savagery, even coming from Puck, from people of, they are not like a friend I have who, he was going to put on a totally non-ironic play production of a 17th century Kingdom of Dahomey. I think where a presently voodoo Benin country is located, if you look at West African map on the coast, and it was at the time called Kingdom of Dahomey, it was ruled by cannibal kings who paved the streets with enemy corpses, or who actually kept or even grew people in

these water swamps like the way you see on TV Japanese movies they grow rice in patties well these were patties where they grew people they grew them to eat them and it was they said that somehow keeping them in the swamp water tenderize the flesh and that tormenting them with pikes improved the flavor now we're getting into cute territory but you know this actually happened the Kingdom of Dahomey, and I had this friend who wanted to put on pre-production, celebrating these innovations. You know, this tribute to multiculturalism, so to speak, so I wonder why no one of you ever did this. It would be a very good slap in the face actually to multicultural pieties, and how could it be condemned? It's one of these quandaries you put them in, because this, before colonialism, they

can't blame it, but you know, they always find this scope that in fact they can't accept such brutality, so it makes you wonder what they actually mean when they embrace hippie and similar other argument like the hippie against the strictures of civilization. Well, I will get to that in a moment, but what this shows, Baba, why am I saying this? This last weekend, I finally exit my exile in the mountains. I have been hiding in the mountains, not for fear of the so-called pandemic, but I wanted solitude in nature. And finally I break some of my solitude. I go to Reykjavik and I'm revealing now where I am. Most of you know. But it doesn't matter because by the time you listen to this show, at least most of you listen to it, I will already have left Iceland where I've been for the last few

months and I will not make a mistake again of revealing to public my current location. You know, I always used to reveal a location at a time differential, but this time I told people where I was while I was here and it ended up being a tack, very unusual. But so anyway, I finally have this chance to use this empty apartment Reykjavik, so So I go there to look around and I realize something, just, you know, clean streets everywhere. Of course I expected this well-functioning Nordic country, everything works so well. You might expect the Nordic countries, but the islanders, the Icelanders I know, the ones who are frogs I mean, the ones who are on our side in some way, they are very consistent about one thing.

They do not like the feminist government here, which has this puritanical streak, except without the religious greatness of the Calvinists. It's just a kind of, you could say, secularized puritanism, where alcohol was basically banned until the 1970s or 80s, and now the government has a monopoly on alcohol, which is extremely expensive, and this is not liked by people who are our friends. Then also what they do, whether real or not, they introduce these new Wuhan flu restrictions the last week of July, just as they were going to do away with all restrictions because things still close 11 p.m. all this summer. This of course has terrible effect on young people's social lives because it's centered much around nightlife, especially in summer where you don't have night and the parties

went on to six in the morning and so forth, so you know, I don't understand the medical reasoning but I said this on my account too, they are taking advantage of political situation to do what they want anyway, in this case to restrict carousing and drinking and all this which they hate. So it's a much milder way of course to take advantage of this whole crisis than what Latino American governments or even local United States government are doing, which I believe in some case even rises to killing people in hospitals in this in order to pillage and grift as much as they can during this emergency. But okay, look, so they do this now in Iceland and I look around at empty streets and I think these men used to be Vikings, the super Vikings, they came here with Irish slave wife, it was

the land of no law where you, you know, you kidnap a redhead woman from Ireland and you take her here, Irish slave wife, you enjoy the bounty of nature and the sea by yourself. Read about the Icelandic Free State. This very important, I think, for radical libertarians like the Valorian Society and and others, but this especially Valorian society, our friend, well, we have various friends who like to talk about them, but after the settlement of this island in the 800s and the 900s, it was a place of total freedom. Problems were decided by dual and they had the Altingi, the parliament, once a year, which was organized at a sacred place named Tingvellir. It's near a lake and a gorge. You may have seen this gorge in a show, Game of Normies, Game of Thrones.

And it's actually, it's the only place on earth that you can see the mid-Atlantic ridge on land. It rises to, it's like a small mountain gorge there. And I almost had to drive by it in the middle of the night the other day. A very frightening situation. I don't want to get into it, but night is returning, you know, night already back. It's dark now as I am talking to you, and so I'm leaving here. I mean, it frighten me. The landscapes here aren't just pretty, but supernaturally frightening. And at night, who knows what happens, you know? When I got here, it was like 24 hour a day. In midsummer especially, it was full of berbs. And the lake nearby where I am hiding, They were making a resounding, amazing sound. They come here for a parliament of their own.

It must be in the summers, when light all the time. And on the river, I go for a walk. I saw every day a swan family. They come here to breed, maybe, as land of Apollo. So 24 hour, I don't know, they must like this sun. If I seem hesitant to talk to you about what this mean, it's because something about this frightens me, you know? And the sound of the birds scare me. If you look in Homer, Iliad, there is a part there where he talk about how it sound when many tribe of birds come on the Scamandrian plain, and they descend with a loud clang. And it was just like this when I would look on this lake And it was the sun all day as they would go completely insane They would go crazy and I love to look at them. But this what I'm trying to tell you

This I am frightened to say but as the dark began to return so right now Let's say full darkness. You have maybe five or six hour but dark began to return Let's say maybe a week to two weeks ago and at that time I see immediate silence So you go walk by that lake that was full of birds and it's totally dead silent even during the day now There's birds have all left. There's nothing there. The Angelica is a white flower of Very good medicinal benefit. They've all turned color. It's time for me to go something is happening Something I believe in the darkness There's something sinister that happened here the animal feel it and they all leave or they go hiding I don't know something come out of the lava fields. I don't want to think Anyway, I don't tell you where I'm going next.

But so the Icelanders had the free state and it ended, I think, in the 1200s when the High King of Norway, he sent his people there. But you know, Norway at the time was also a loose society. The Alpha Chad Norwegian giants, they were facing a Malthusian population pressure at that time, Scandinavia. So they took ships to Iceland and by right of challenge, by duel, they were big and strong. They took over much of the land, and it's ancient traditions of freedom, if maybe not ended completely because the parliament still met and so forth yearly, but it was the end of the Icelandic Free State. So what I'm saying is these are freedom-loving warrior-explorer men of highest caliber. I just went this week to Stikisholmur, I don't know how to pronounce, Stikisholmur.

It's a harbor on the western peninsula here where the voyages to Greenland and America were kicked off. Very amazing. And it's still a working harbor, very pleasant to look at. But these were world-conquering men. And they drink out of skulls, they eat raw sheep and horse and all this. So look, I'm not going where you think I am. You think now, I will say for example, how do Swedes go from Vikings and then Charles the 12th taking all of the Russian Empire and almost defeating them. He was defeated at Battle of Poltava against Peter the Great. And from that point I think Sweden disappeared from world history, become province of Europe. But Charles the 12th was amazing superman of warrior king. Maybe I do show a man of greatness on him.

But how do the Swedes go from Gustavus Adolphus to what they are now, which this typical argument of people on our side, which you may think the Swedes are these soft gay lads, but I must tell you it's not true. Even in the case of Sweden, this trope you're spreading is very false. I would put an average Swedish man against an American conservacuck doughboy any day. It's not a real problem in Sweden. Where men, in many cases, are very powerful, much more manly than average American or Anglo cock or Med cock or whatever you have. You know, look at the golden lion in this, and it's not a problem in Iceland too. And actually the men in Iceland act very manly, as much as anything you find in the Slav lands or Russia or East Europe.

And by distinction, the people here in general seem to be in good health. Some of the women are chubby, but overall the people seem to be in quite good health. They are not poisoned by zog foods or the New World Order lifestyle, they are healthy, they have good skin and this. But what I will tell you is this, these men used to carouse drinking with skull of opponent, And that, by the way, is a big part of Indo-European warrior culture, the feast. Feasting is much literature on this, both ancient and modern scholarly literature, but read Tacitus on the ancient Germanics, who are the same people as these ones. I mean, if you know Saxon or Old English, you can almost read Icelandic. But the feast is very important. warlord of the brotherhood, of armed men.

He put on feasts as a reward for his men. And on the other hand, if you were an initiate into this, what you call the mannerbund, you had to put on a feast for your lord when you became warrior, which you know is very interesting. In Northern Europe, this tradition was carried on very late. If you were a doctoral student, upon gaining doctorate, you had to put on a feast for your advisor and it was a direct inheritance of that right and of course you know it should not be done now it's one thing if you're talking and you're doing this and then it's another if you see the gaylords of today studying nothing at all in academia completely bankrupt like I I keep saying it completely bankrupt but so I'm telling you that the feasting as they take away part of this people's

spirit with the alcohol restrictions in the north. This is what I'm trying to tell you. What is the point of that? Nietzsche says that Christianity and beer were the Germans' drugs, his soporifics. But you know, I would change this a bit because to what end was Christianity about the Nordics and alcohol prohibition, but to make them civilized and what this means. In other words, I want to ask you, is it worth it? It keeps everything running well, the country powered by geothermal heat, which is free, everything runs great, clean, safe streets. But for this you have men working a regular job, and I suppose the big question is if the trade-off is worth it, because in this sanitized, tamed world, it is the single mother and the weakling who has protection most of all.

And the men have hard lives of work for decades. I just saw, Graft, Icelanders, for example, they work longest years, most decades of anyone in Europe. And I'm asking, what is it for? Now that I say this, you say, oh, Bap, you advocate alcoholism. You advocate free love and weed smoking and this. Well, no, I do not. But I ask you to what end the restrictions on carousing and feasting life of men, why is this done? What is gained? It's not space travel, it is not a society organized to conquest, if not of other nations then maybe of nature, but it's not a place of conquest where the visionary scientist and the soldier are honored. And not just honored, but actually they're given what they want, the tools and space

to expand their gifts and to put them to greater use than they would in the state of barbarism. To make others of great use to them, who in the state of barbarism would be slaves or would not exist. But then, if not this, to what end is it? Because the Vikings, they actually, while they were barbarians, they built ocean-going ships, they explored new worlds, they obviously knew how to do much more than the average modern man, even the modern engineer. Ask modern engineer to build a sea-going ship, or to make a chariot from primary materials, ancient indo-europeans to know how to make chariots from different types of fine young wood you know you need different kinds of wood to bend the wheel and the different spokes and all of this do they know how to do that tell

me unless you have a space-faring heroic state what is purpose of restricting men's lives like this with alcohol restrictions and the you know the the pieties of Christianity and all this, and now the worldwide actually dampening of fun that you see, and they're using this disease as excuse. What is the purpose of all this? Because then this so-called sublimation that is so important for civilization becomes nothing but the door to slavery, where men toil their lives away in exchange for giving up natural freedom, in exchange for giving up carousing, you know, the opening of opportunities to conquer through violence and wit, in exchange for giving all that up, they get not the colonization of the solar system, but instead they get privilege to make the world clean, safe and

full and very nice and pretty and safe with food in the belly of defectives. Tell me what the trade-off is and do not talk about civilization in the abstract or of history but right now, where is the trade-off? I will be right back. I think this is a depressing topic for sure but I get quite melancholic when I have to to leave country and the supernatural beauty of this place. I am sometimes sad to leave it, but also this week especially stressful for me. I was stranded the other night. They close a major road here. I was driving at night almost at sundown. And I see this as attack. A friend told me when I tell him this story, since they will attack you, they try to feed you to mountain troll. I believe this because if you can believe it,

they close down the main artery of the country on a very important juncture. Think if they close down something like I-95 in United States, but not for a short thing where you just go around, but they close it, let's say, for equivalent of a one-hour drive. They try to divert me, I'm telling you, around a mountain so they could feed me to troll. I turned car around when I saw what was happening. It was a dirt road around the mountains. This was their detour, okay? So I head back to nearest town and I stay in hotel. But on the way back, I did stop in front of construction worker who had closed the road and I tells him, are you crazy? You close main artery of country and you send people many miles behind mountain on dirt road. And the peon was surprised.

I tell him, I make him come out of truck. They import labour peons here too, this guy was Cape Verde, so you know this biggest problem of country, I think they're actually doing so well, I guess they don't want to do their own shit work, so they import labour here too. Which is why, by the way, the Wuhan disease restarted here, if you can believe this, they kept bars closed, they wouldn't let bars open after 11pm, this was the only restriction, but in my opinion a quite significant one. So they keep nightlife and bars closed at 11 to terrorize their young people out of all social life. But they opened the airport so that annoying tourists could come in. The most disgusting kind of woman is the 25 to 35, maybe to 40 year old woman, white woman

who wears the fashionable cloth face mask which is medically insignificant. And they all have this way of moving like gay Jewish men. It's hard to describe, this kind of hunched over with the arms behind their back. I'll have to do a show for you once where I show you how they actually move. I'll feel myself shirtless and show you how they move. So they open the airport, these disgusting tourists come in, they're a blight on the natural beauty when I have to see one, thankfully there are still very few. And then of course they could bring their cheap labor pets in and that's how the disease restarted here and they put restrictions back in. What a coincidence. So now I stop on this peon and I tell him, you think I don't know?

You think I don't know what waiting for me around the bend in the road that I could see through the fog, the creature you think I could not see in that fog? And I say to him and he was shocked. He was completely shocked. I left before he could say anything and I at least I could sleep well in this kind of IKEA type hotel. I have to tell you I couldn't sleep before that for nights this week I don't know if it's the licorice or The fermented shark or strong cheese, and that's that's right. Thomas 777 who some of you know as an amazing poster I hope he come back, but he used to make fun of me because he say I have grand mal seizure if you give me cheese that's too strong like Limburger cheese I joke Thomas and I are friend he

was joking but so you know the closing of bars of clubs and this not just in Iceland but worldwide a very serious problem underrated at moment under disgust I see this book as control as these type of places nightclubs and such as control as they may ultimately be okay these bars and so forth in fact they represent a certain limited free space for proles, and I refer to all of us as proles here in the hypothetical party system we live in. If you don't get invited to Epstein Island or similar, you're somewhere on the prole spectrum. So, you know, maybe just we say the people, the bars, the nightclubs, the nightlife, the beaches to some extent, the things that are absolutely forbidden now. These are limited free spaces in modern Leviathan.

I'm aware they're kind of, you could say, simulated fake because the openings of them, like I say in book, are policed, but inside there is a kind of space that is not surveilled by Leviathan or its authorities, and it isn't even so much what goes on there regarding openings into the underworld or the drug world and such, which are mostly limited and harmless from the point of view of the occupational class. But it's not actually the content that people are actually meeting and plotting, but it's the effect such places have on the spirit of the common man. They build energy. Do you understand? It is this promotion of energy in spaces that are not directly under the control of the sovereign that they see as dangerous.

The building of energy, of solidarity, in bars, in coffee houses at times, in history, in clubs, in some place in the world, for example, beaches, in Rio de Janeiro, the beach is major organizing principle of much of people's social life, it used to be at least. So all of this, these small rituals also, like meeting for smoke break at work outside, outside the workplace, outside view of the HR mammy, something that's no longer done either but meeting outside overseers eye to smoke or meet at bar if you're interested you look at sociologists Irving Goffman or especially you look at sociologist Randall Collins the bureaucrat tell me of this guy Randall Collins the last great wasp sociologist who believes in his case if you believe

moral behavior arises out of precisely these types of interaction rituals as he calls them. But I think on a deeper level, his point is this ritual builds emotional energy. People feed off each other's energy in such situations and it builds upon itself. It boosts solidarity. It boosts confidence. It increases people's feelings that they can face challenges together, competently. So now social psychologists with these lockdowns, they destroy this public sphere of the common man, the destroyability of common people to engage in such, whether it's schools, in bars, beaches, gyms. Gyms used to be a major place of social ferment, you know, at a certain time. The organization council in Germany, interwar Germany, Weimar Germany, they had a front

organization called Olympia Sportfaren and you could think of a network of fascist gyms, you see. So you have to think about why I promote some of the things I promote on my account, you know, why people pretend not to understand that. But social distancing even takes away not just everything I said, which of course is banned worldwide now, but even small things like the smoke break or whatever was around that was like the smoke break. And why would they do this? The demoralizers, of course, they would do this. What you call black pillars, but what are improperly called pessimists and what are in fact agents of demoralization. When they're genuine, they are demoralizing themselves and they're trying to pass it on to you.

But more often, they are agents of demoralization who are all working towards this same end, even when they're not aware of it themselves. This is all possibly coordinated. The CIA, for example, and I don't think they're the ones necessarily doing it, but it's without a doubt that the CIA has a long history of trying to leverage research from the social sciences to promote various aims and you can see in all the lockdown measures, these social science research results that I've just mentioned, they are put into action from the opposite side. In other words, they try to stop these so-called interaction rituals that build energy and common mean solidarity. They try to stop this from happening. Not really any medical necessity, in other words, but the necessity rather of breaking

the energy bonds, the social solidarity, breaking the confidence of the people. And in particular, of course, of the nationalist movements, because they, most of all, of any movement are susceptible to this because they spread actually outside the view of the authorities. To break Trump momentum in election year, they already have now, you know, they have Brexit, they have Bolsonaro, they have Philippines, in other words, they've studied all of these, they have a few European locations where you had populist nationalist movements, they saw what was happening with Salvini in Italy, a very effective propaganda, Salvini does. Men of the people mingling and such builds tremendous affection and energy, common energy built together.

And of course, they've observed closely as a Trump phenomenon and the way he builds on his audience and there's a feedback back and forth, you know, there's a back and forth between Trump and the audience and Trump learns from that. He decides on direction by doing that. What do all of these have in common? It is the sphere of the people, their culture you could say, but it continues parallel and apart from the media. This, my point, it continues apart from the organs of the occupational class. It's not reflected in mass media in terms of journalism, of course, but not even in TV show, it's not in movies or music, it's rather a parallel world that they, the controllers almost forgot existed, and it was not completely impervious to their media manipulations, but

it was never smothered by it either. It was this kind of parallel world of the people that continued outside the narrative of the media that you see, and the anonymity of the internet allowed briefly, less so now but still does, allowed amplification of the people's mind. It boosted their ability to reach each other, and then it allowed for the election for first time in decades, I think, of people like Trump or Bolsonaro who could present existential threat to the leviath, and maybe last time anything like this was Nixon, maybe. But not forget, the anonymity of the internet is merely a reflection of this, that the parallel world, as I call it, the parallel world of the people continued outside of media or supervisor

surveillance, which means its primary expression was still in person-to-person interaction. This is the point, face-to-face interaction. This is how it happened. This is how all these nationalist movements happen. It is that interaction that builds emotional bonds, which is somebody like Randall Collins, who I've just mentioned. This is why someone like him… By the way, I say Randall Collins, but all this sociological research is based on Durkheim, By the way, if you're interested in sociology, and to go back to the source and so on, you go to Durkheim. Foucault completely plagiarized Durkheim, but Durkheim very important. So why somebody like Randall Collin, he say this public rituals like sports events, concerts

or the types of smaller interaction I mentioned, these build emotional solidarity bonds in the same way religion does, whereas internet interaction does not. He has some very interesting lines about this, how especially the body is very important in these parts of interaction rituals, especially in forming sexual attraction and the emotional bonds that form among a crowd. I don't want to be extreme and say it's an extension of sexual attraction, but it's part of the same energy spectrum, you could say, and the men like Trump or Mussolini, they know the people, the crowd is a woman. You have to seduce them, they know how to do that, they use humor, they use charm. But you know, in this connection I hear even that anti-smoking movement, the primary intention

of it was not health, but it was to stop the smoking break so you know workers could no longer commiserate together outside of the view of the employers and the supervisors, especially the HR mamies. What by the way is an HR person inside corporation today? If you went to any, let's say, laboratory or company, so-called, in communist East Bloc in Soviet Union, you'd have party officials there. It was a delegate from the party. They were there to observe. Well, that's what the HR official is in today's corporation. But you see where I go with this. The internet allowed amplification of signal through anonymous voices primarily, but it It also brought this parallel world to view of the occupational class and its organs.

And first they tried to dismiss it as foreign influence in Russia and this. But now in election year, because they know it's real, they go right to the source to totally destroy all public life, to destroy, erase social space outside of their supervision and control, and to destroy emotional basis of Trump momentum, the social solidarity built not only through his rallies that are now much harder to do, but the fact that this nationalist anti-establishment backlash has been taking place through private face-to-face channels. People talk to each other. The types of interactions I described in bars, in workplaces during break, this is how populist movements spread by word of mouth. So they must think that if they can shut those venues down, they can destroy the momentum

of a nationalist political awakening that's been happening. This is what the social research I just mentioned, the social science, this is what it teaches them, which is why you must not let them win. And this goes, like I say, well beyond Trump. And if you feel he's let you down on some policy or other, I will talk about that later, but it has not to do with that. It has to do with whether we are going to be manipulated by these scum people. It has to do with whether they can, as Alex Jones say, they want to put you in a pod. Well, you're already half in the pod. The lockdown, you're halfway in the matrix pod. And it has to do with whether you let them sodomize you with these demoralization campaigns,

with this destruction of all public sphere of your lives, with the emergence and in their approved media organs only that they, excuse me, that they blessed and smothered you with. There are various tools online and on TV they present you only with a demoralization campaign of one kind or another. Much of it is centered, by the way, ultimately on psychosexual demoralization. So the American people, as well as much of the world now, is being subjected literally to psychological warfare campaign by their own governments and by China. I will be right back. It is night outside still and I am very afraid. is why is, why is sun not coming, why is sun not coming? You have a large contingent of the damned in your society, of people who are both afraid of death more than anything else,

and who are susceptible to demoralization and hysteria. This condition of a modern state, where through crisis the same public health authorities and experts, the same ones who I attacked in my book, these can mobilize maybe 30, 40% of the population to support essentially an indefinite smothering of life. I don't think they will succeed, actually, because worldwide there are already grumblings and stirrings up of the people, including in Germany, massive protests, and people are not taking this for much longer, but is insane to hear proposals for five years of masks or to say that the crisis will last another year from people who seem otherwise sane. So even if they not succeed, I'm telling you, they would like to keep it closed indefinitely.

And they have supporters for that who are easily rattled into submission. By the way, I think some countries might end up disappearing because of what you're seeing now. For example, Argentina, they've kept the country in extreme lockdown for many, many months, many, many months now. And I mentioned nightlife on previous part of this show. Well, in Argentina this was more than in other places, a very free place outside of view of the government. It's completely shut down now. Seventy percent of the middle class in Argentina want to leave the country. They've been living under complete terror for months, in part of their own making because they buy into the hysteria. But the disease has continued there without any stop because it's spread, well, people

don't know exactly how it spreads, but it's certainly spread among the favelados, they're not called that there, but the slum dwellers. But I'm telling you, a country like Argentina, I do not see how businesses and such that have been closed for months can ever open again. And that country might stop existing, sure, it might be a place called Argentina. But if let's say 70% or 60% of the middle class leaves as they want to leave, and where would they go by the way, but let's say they leave, if that country is brought down to the level of Venezuela or Africa, look at the face of the subhuman running Argentina right now. Do you think he cares about that? He is a peon of the international left.

If Argentina is reduced to level of Guinea-Bissau, if Buenos Aires becomes slum, you know, Nairobi, That's better for him. People like him want that. So you have this problem modernity that is the end of peoples and the end of states. I don't think people realize what is happening and this submission of the middle class. But this makes me wonder again if the problem of modern condition is not ultimately one of biology. And it must be, unless you think you can turn this human material around with mere thoughts or beliefs. I mean, again, look at the face of the leader of Argentina. Tell me about thoughts and beliefs. Tell me about philosophy. Look at Robert the Negro, where you have this cow-like or insectoid races of peoples that

have achieved a critical mass for essentially a permanent dampening of human life as life. Peace on the menu, the dampening of human life as life. And what they're trying to put this in action, so even though it seems they are failing, they might destroy some countries now, but they will fail, people are not tolerating it. Nevertheless, the attempt you've just seen should alarm you. It should make my call in the book for military men, for police, and for others to organize and take power in the nations within the next 20 years. This becomes immediate unless you want Dr. Fauci and Gabby Giffords to turn you into a gimp. In the next 10 to 20 years, the men of the world must arise and seize back the nation. This is what I try to say.

That's right, Gabby Giffords, she spoke recently at the so-called DNC convention and I used to say about her, you know, when she got shot in the head, she's just this congresswoman she got shot in the head, and she survived that. And I told Hakan at the time, I told everyone, they're trying to introduce something to plant the idea that you can live without a brain, to say, to suggest to people that massive lobotomy is perfectly consistent with a full and functional, insert human resources voice here please, okay, you know what I mean, a full functional rewarding human life. So they had this MK ultra freak. He blew out the brain of Gabby Giffords and now they put her out like a controlled mannequin in front of DNC convention to show she can still talk, okay, after she get brain lobotomy.

I told you this 10 years ago that they would be doing this, that this is what they are up to. So I ask people to see what they are doing and to awaken before it's too late. But look, because in talking in Shoah, whether civilization as such is worth it, and of course with civilization as a kind of captive beast that puts strong men at work and in slavery so that brain dead giffords and falchi faggot gimps, the people I described in first segment of Shoah, so they can suck at your tit and milk you dry of essence, I'm asking what is point to any of that or saying to you there is no point to any of that you must understand that part that civilization when successful it tends to unfortunately biologically nullify

itself in the same way that empire like Gobineau said Gobineau the steampunk father of racism wrote book Inequality of the Human Races but why he say do big empires fall because the The great races, the imperial races of men are not parochial, they seek expansion. They end up ruling others, this is one of his big points, you know, that inferior races like the blacks, they are completely parochial, they only care about the tribe. They know nothing outside their small patch of jungle, you move them to Haiti, you put ideas of French enlightenment in their heads, they act same as in Africa. Only care about the tribe, only care about the people. By contrast, the great races, it's not just the Aryan by the way, there are other he names,

the Malays and so forth, but they end up ruling others, they employ universalist or cosmopolitan religions and beliefs of various kinds to do this, and this in turn starts to bring conquered peoples from the periphery of their empire into the core, where then unfortunately occurs intermixing, and it is through this intermixing with foreign peoples that a great Great founding imperial nation is ended and diluted as this only way that great civilizations fall and disappear as this tragedy you can say of human biology and maybe of all alien biology too, that the great of any species they go through this process of becoming universal but then through this they adulterate their blood. So when people speak of the filter, Elon Musk says the other day, the filter we have to

to pass. I don't know what that means, but this is the filter. This is possibly why all civilizations end, not just on our own world, but on many other worlds. This why they end. And the secret problem is that Plato and others with knowledge inherited from Atlantis, which I believe the Atlanteans were trying this, but they were destroyed by natural disaster, they were trying to solve this problem I just mentioned with creation of eugenic republic hidden on island. But that is my aim too, in a way, and it's topic for another time. But I see all this because there are many examples of rebellion against the system that are in fact worthless. So you must understand what I mean when I say I attack civilization

in this way, you see. When I attack the Fauci, the Giffords, when I attack it, I attack civilization only in a particular way and not in another. I do so in the book, too. There is chapters there called Civilization and Barbarism. Most attacks on civilization today are fake, they're worthless, and in fact, what I mean to tell you is they serve only to further enslave the superior specimens. Take movie, for example, American Beauty. It's one of the most hateful movies ever made. It's full of examples of pointless rebellions, many other movies like this too, and in large part the whole critical theory, POMO, postmodernist deconstructionist model of politics, where shapeless generic systems of oppression determine structure of society and its restrictions,

and which are opposed by equally generic counterculture. And this whole pointless emotional aesthetic performance of roles on both sides is supposed to replace political life, but all it does is it induces you to think non-politically, not in terms of sovereignty, not in terms of concrete political goals, which I repeat is why Q, despite its sensationalistic shell, its outward form, is actually one of the only genuinely political movements that exists now. But this whole model of the counterculture, the pointless rebellion against the strictures of society and civilization. It does nothing, which is why the CIA, among others, it funded this kind of garbage. They funded the Frankfurt Skrull, they funded Foucault, they funded all intellectual movements

that tried to get you think in terms of this kind. The biggest fake liberation movement of this kind was the hippies. And like I say in the beginning of the show, this still in a big way is ideal of the academic left, of journalists left, in fact of the entire establishment, and it's not just about relive a boomer years, but they actually say things like, this is our own wood stock and this kind of thing. This, their idea, the hippie liberation movement against strictures of society, I'm telling you is fake. Now look, I know if you listen to people who were actually involved in 1960s movements, Some of them, like Camille Paglia, they say that the modern left isn't really the heir of the hippies, who are trying to open themselves, according to her, to a cosmic understanding,

to return to nature in some genuine way of experience of titanic natural reality, to engage genuinely with Eastern spirituality and this. And her line is that actually 1960s movement leaders ended up having no effect in American society or government after, let's say, 1970 or so, because they all burned their minds out on LSD and other psychedelics. They were not able to bring back their insights from those mental journeys. And she considered herself one of the very few still carrying that liberating vision as she sees it. Although it's very significant that she tempers it by saying that even at its best, the liberation projects of 1960s was naive, because they did not realize that nature is not benevolent or mild, but rather is this line from Hobbes, man is wolf to man.

Nature read in tooth and claw. So for Paglia, whenever you open the way back to innocence of nature, whenever you try to embrace nature in this way. It always leads to darkness of sexual subjugation, of violence, and an anarchy that is better called the rule of the stronger than real anarchy. So she uses actually Woodstock event of 1969 and the violence and deaths that took place there as a rebuke. She thinks it's a reality and nature rebuking the innocent dreams of the hippies with their grass-hot communes and their visions of idyllic return to basic animal needs. She believes AIDS crisis of 1970s, that's obviously when it started, was another form of natural rebuke to their attempt to return to free sexuality and such.

And Paglia say that after all this, it wasn't then the actual hippies who came to prominence in the 1970s, but the careerists who sought to use their image and cultural associations and so forth to advance themselves in this very cynical way, but who were actually very stayed bourgeois, you can say, very stayed stuffed suits, the people who actually ended up ruling the left in the name of the hippies. And there is an essay where she explains this very well. It's called Academy in the Hour of the Wolf, Junk Bonds and Corporate Raiders, I think is the title. I've posted it before. Where she explains the entire postmodern and academic left movement in exactly this way. I recommend you read. It's a very good essay, long but good. I will be right back with more of this in a moment.

I might listen to some musics to relax. One second, still no sunrise. I am very frightened. Yes, so on this show I try to tell you one important thing, that it matter very much where your attack on civilization come from. And I mean to tell you that the left isn't really attacking civilization. What are they doing? I tell you in a moment. Look, you must understand animal needs are always cannibalistic. If there's one thing I accept from Schopenhauer, not necessarily his valuation of life, but this idea of the fundamentally cannibalistic nature of the will, and therefore of all natural phenomena you see, whether animate or not, they are cannibalistic. And I've said before, but for Paglia, who I think actually is coping in the argument I just told you, by the way, I don't agree with her,

she's trying to find some way out because I think the 1960s are in fact worthless, a fake liberation even at its height, but she's trying to find some way out of that, and she says that event, Woodstock, and a few other similar event in 1970s, for her they represent maybe in farcical form, in comedic form, in microcosm perhaps, a repetition of another historical situation. The same principle she sees in Rousseau French Revolution and Marquis de Sade where Rousseau who is Rousseau again? He is spiritual prophet of the modern left in all its forms He is source of this vision of return to basic animal nature, right? So he he had vision of early man You can think very close to what a hippie commune might aim for vision of men

uncorrupted by the evils of inequality introduced by private property and by the systems of political structure and of thought and religion that were introduced by the rich to protect their own interests. So this basically how he sees civilization as a kind of conspiracy to protect interests of property and the rich. I'm simplifying much, yes, but this, even if it is not exact word of Rousseau vision, this how it was received by much of the left and by the hippies, you know, is nothing new. Actually it's nothing new. consider this briefly also in the Republic very early on in the Republic Socrates and his someone he talked to in the play Republic glaucon they are discussing a political arrangement very so an arrangement like this of kind of

they say what if people lived blank blank blank like this like I tell you there was so hippie commune by the river and you fish what you need but it is is dismissed as a republic of pigs, is dismissed as something subhuman by one of Socrates' students in that dialogue. And I suppose if I were sly, I would ask you to read that part of Plato's Republic and to see if there is any real reason why this so-called republic of pigs is dismissed in the book, if you agree with the reasons why this is dismissed. And if not, in fact, this is actually a form of government that is most in keeping with justice as it is understood in that book, I mean Plato's Republic, which should reveal to you, however, not the greatest of this return to the grass hut, to the long house,

but whether justice itself is something so very good at all, and if actually other things are not much more important than justice, which is something I wish you over-civilized baboons would finally get into your thick, impermeable skull. So you know, it's very strange, I remember talking to a guy once, he was younger than This must have been I don't remember it if it was family party or it's cruel of lower learning and I asked him I Forget how this come up, but ask him what is wrong with killing a man and taking his wife You know, it's very common in Shakespeare this kind of primordial act of killing a man taking his wife What is wrong with this and he become very angry and he was an atheist, you know a committed one

But you do the same on Reddit and you get same reaction from atheists and I remember trolling a leftist protesters I've known before I throw them in same way with this line and I've never seen this girl completely lost it She couldn't believe I would say this thing, but they can never tell you what's wrong with that. They just get angry So it makes me think, you know You can come up with all kinds of convoluted the reasons of why they have this reaction For example, you can say that shithole ideology is a form of secularized Christianity or of secularized Judaism, or this, and that these people are actually motivated by beliefs they've inherited. By the way, this idea of secularized Judaism, that's not a Nazi saying that.

That is the Jewish writer Karl Lewis, he says that Marxism is secularized Judaism. Very strange. But so look, you can come up with these reasons and so forth and that these people are motivated actually deep down by beliefs they've inherited, unexamined beliefs about what is good for mankind, beliefs about justice or life or whatever, and that they've inherited for example Christian values but without understanding why and so they have now a secular justification of it. But I think something different, I think, as I keep telling you, I think this actually biological response this what I keep telling you I'm asking is modern life a biological problem first of all is it because this is a kind of type of man that exists because in case of many of these people I cannot see them behaving

otherwise and I do think this kind of submissiveness without cause to a kind of this kind of bovine moralistic intransigence is something in their blood it makes me sick to think of it actually but I think it's true so what What I'm saying, oh yes, so Paglia says that Rousseau had this vision of the innocence of hippie nature, to which men can return in these grass-hot communes and whatnot. But along comes the French Revolution and its bloody outcome, and then of course Marquis de Sade during the revolution, and he's this completely insane, although they actually try to turn him into a figure of sexual hippie liberation too. If you can believe it, there's this awful movie Quills. It's completely absurd.

But I remember trolling my leftist feminist teacher in high school with Marquis de Sade to the point where she started crying and she sent me to principal office. Because actually Paglia is right that Marquis de Sade is a huge repudiation of everything that the left holds dear. And he just totally blows up all ideas of innocence of men, of innocence of nature. And no, you know, it's not civilization that makes men evil or corrupts him. It is the pure savage animalistic nature that is the root and cause of this bloody violence. It is the cause of hierarchy and of sexual subjugation. Please just send them dominated by Doug, please send them this, see how they react. But it is nature that is the source of all this and it is civilization that at great cost it restrains this.

So what the hippie wants, this what I've been trying to tell you this whole show. Not the redditor type, moralistic cow I mentioned on the first segment and so forth. What do these people want? These people who don't know where their notion of good or bad comes from. They do not want liberation from civilization. They seek liberation from nature and in particular they look alarmed, they're completely alarmed, they look at a world in which not everyone has been domesticized already, domesticated. They see their own broken nature, their weak blood bred for domestication, and they are at times not even in need any longer of a state maybe, but they see this and themselves as the standard of all life and they are alarmed when they look on a world where maybe not

all men are the same, not all are happy with this petty world of for example the European common market and this, they're not happy being turned into a suck dry worker drone the benefit of the human herd cow like this and this the human bug man the longhouse man everywhere in the civilized so-called world today they look alarm they don't know what to make of this and this is the creature the timid the timid bug the timid bug behind all the fake calls for liberation in the 20th century and right now also in the in the present disturbances you are seeing these are broken people who are alarmed that the state exists as a vestige to remind them that not everyone is or wants to be domesticated but this is why

i direct all my efforts my book and now this show this for another kind of man and i direct it only to those who have the ability and the will to seize the states in the next let's say 10 to 20 years who are not concerned with the salvation of all mankind because much of that biological material is already very botched but who can seize the machinery of civilization and who can once again put it to great use on behalf of great projects and i have many in mind i seek archaeological equipment for research in arctic circle karasi i will say more on this until next time back out