I watched your movie last night, Killing of a Chinese Bokeh, 1976, by John Cassavetes, director. He is better known as a lead in Rosemary Baby, Polanski Rosemary Baby, the husband of Mia Farrow in that movie, the one who make a pact with Satanist, Witch Cubbin, but he also directed movies. I could say, look, I'm not a movie snob, so I don't know if correct to say this, but it It felt very much like a new wave of French cinema, in this case American New Wave, killing of a Chinese bookie, a so-called neo-noir Los Angeles noir movie, about a small-time nightclub owner, a kind of a girls' nightclub where you have burlesque-type art show, so-called art show with girls, really, but it's just an elevated strip club with some art pretensions in this movie.

of Chinese bookies. The showman he has on stage is actually quite macabre. He wants to be avant-garde art, but people just come there for the titty show, for the titty show. How about them breasts? How about them titties? Much of a frog Twitter, they like the breasts and aren't so much into the ass. And by the way, when a recent controversy, my friend And Loki Julianus, he complained about how in some video game, I think, anime video game, they had a girl, previously Japanese anime, with very large breasts, and they do breast reduction in feminist American version of this anime, I think, video game. I think Tifa or something, doesn't matter. But he got attacked by many vile socialist type people, feminist turned men, who they

tried to excoriate his very wholesome taste for titties, for breasts. And you know, so why they do this? Would you rather somebody be into foot fetish like Hunter Biden? I think the taste for big breasts very evolutionarily advanced, unlike for foot fetish. Is that what you like with the leggings, and this is repulsive modern taste. That's when the legging for a foot fetish, but what about the taste for the ass that has become very ubiquitous modern taste. Modern taste runs for the ass. It's a topical and debased orientation. And this via Brazil, I remember even long ago, in public newsstands, magazines, it said a-bunda, a paixao nacional, the national passion, the national passion, the mulattas loved me.

I'm telling you, they're still okay there, you know, I guess, but they were better before some years ago because the obesity has started to take off even in Brazil. I say this before, but they're giving up their national advantage now with a bakery on every corner and the love they promote for dainty sweets and this. So many of their women become fat, like cracked womans. They become chubbier at least. Just throw one of their national virtues into the garbage. I used to have some arguments about this with eggheads. I say to them, at least they are not fat. They look good, and they are good at sex. What are you good at? You're not good at liberty anymore. I'm talking to American intellectuals now who are outraged that I would want to spend my time in Brazil and not talk to them.

But I tell them, what are you good at? You're not good at liberty anymore. You don't go to the moon. Tell me why I should be around you. And I'm talking now about the so-called American elite nerds, okay, so really washed out people. I don't know if we're a mood bug and so forth. He go off referring to America's supposed elite as an aristocracy, foot fetish and leggings and this. But actually the human quality is so low where you might have a five foot five Ashky former child actor from New Jersey and he wore a three piece suit and imagine himself living in Evelyn Vaux novel and does this impersonation or wasp impersonation or others who copied from old WASP scholars who they knew an air of studied hesitation to affect moderation

or deep thought or this, so you might as well have Joe Pesci as Secretary of State. Oh, God, you know, is that what I'm saying? I wanted to get away from all that, so I went and enjoyed myself with the mulattas with the Big Abunda in Brazil. I'm saying you can, you could still do this, because unlike the American shibun, the Brazilian mulatta is slim and sexy, still to a large extent. Much gone downhill, but still so. There was a saying, a nightclub bouncer told me, very trite saying known in Brazil, something like a white woman for a wife and a mulatta for a mistress, something like this. So don't tell any of the Wignatt women I said this or they'll send a Dravidian hitman after me. They'll send a Dravidian to hunt me down.

Be careful, Dravidian's very powerful on white nationalist movement online. I'm telling you though, look here, we are the founders of the Bleach Right. It's called Bleach Right. Look it up. One of the most important social movements of the early 21st century, excuse me. It's just the end of the awful roastiers and their tyranny. This Bleach Right movement just ends all of their plans and pretensions. So, you know, why I say this, because this movie, Killing of a Chinese Bookie, directed John Cassavetes and starring Ben Gazzara, which, you know, is a hard movie to take, maybe. It has some quite slow scenes. It's more a study of this character, the owner of a Los Angeles underworld club, rather low-class club, and his gambling addiction,

and how he's embroiled with the mob and all these things. Menaquin On 4 recommended it, and just by chance, I happened to watch it two days after I saw, yet again, Breathless. I rewatched Breathless. This is Goddard's famous movie. This is the beginning of French New Wave, I think 1961, which if you see this movie now, it might strike you somewhat as a pretentious Euro movie, but it has some moments of thrill. It captures in some way a spirit of speed and use, same as, you know, I recommend for you writer like Mishima or Celine, people like this were capturing in a different way around same time or a bit before this spirit of modern youth. But I think in case of this movie, Breathless, Paglia has a great view of it because it has some seemingly languorous scenes of romance and so on.

It's about this French small-time mobster and an American student, a girl in Paris who's an American student who seems very naive and who he is pursuing. And by the end of the movie, you actually see she's a vampire, and Paglia has a right view of how this is a fatal movie, in fact, this femme fatale is a perky blonde with short hair and naive American manners, but actually she sucks this mobster dry, and I mean spiritually now. Anyways, very similar in style of this killing of Chinese booking, American noir style of new wave with slow scenes, a bit unconventional documentary style with Ben Gazzara as this club owner. And I liked very much, for example, they show you slow scenes where he go into a bar just to have a drink when he's finally free of debt to the mob in the beginning.

It captures small moments of life in 1970s America very well in this underworld. Gives you mood of time. And look why I tell you, because he keeps saying in this movie, he refers to his girlfriend who is one of the dancer girls at his club, and she's black. And he refers to her as black and beautiful repeatedly. Look, it's called breach right, okay? You wouldn't understand. But Menacquinone 4 pointed out, this is something you can't have in the United States anymore, because that community, you know, the so-called shibun community of the black community, has been completely destroyed by obesity. Black obesity, black diabetes rate. Look up. So to you, it sounds absurd, right, when I say black girlfriend, because Americans have been robbed of possibility of slim black girls or mulattas.

You have to go to Brazil for that, or Kenya. You can't find it in the United States anymore. So my friend, the most popular man on Afro introduction, the most important playboy in Nairobi, I keep meaning to have him on the show. Maybe I do this after election, but he will tell you of his adventures with whores in the Philippines and Kenya. And so, you know, you've been robbed of this. Like Minakwino says, entire species of attractive women have just been wiped out from existence in America. Now everyone is grotesque, and it makes you think of how actually this is a sign of something much worse. The complete destruction, not just of the blacks in America, through obesity and this, but of working class life now too, in general, working class life in general.

as the underclass of the underclass would only naturally be affected first by these developments, you know, like Canary, this kind of thing, but just as out of wedlock or to more honestly language, the plague of bastardization, bastard births, right? Most of blacks born as bastards, but it's no longer just a black thing. Lately, it's not even just a Hispanic thing, it's very common in white working or underclassed too. You know, in the same way obesity has spread. And now you know obesity is just a symptom of spiritual and other kinds of depression. So it's really just destroyed life in general, you know, in huge parts of modern world. I mean, think, being obese is kind of like being an amputee. It changes life in such drastic way for a young woman,

especially to the extent that the bar scenes and so on, from 1970s movie. For example, from the charming bar scenes, you see, from killing of a Chinese bookie, just casual bar scenes, that whole world is gone, okay? They took the underworld away, or away from your reach, and they took out the working class ability, really to enjoy itself at all, to have an independent existence, whether in the cities or suburbs, doesn't matter. Some of these working class communities, you have to drive from place to place, but it's been wiped out. How can you have a bar and a club scenes like this now, right, everyone in such a setting would be obese, if nothing else, and that alone ruins it. And everyone at this club, all the patrons would be 300 pounds, and the girls, they'd all be,

the dancing girls, I mean, they would be fat as hell too, what would they be doing, anything like that would be some fag hipster club doing a copy of a copy of a burlesque cabaret act, you know, in Weimar Cabaret on this. There's a whole underworld, sleazy world. In other words, it is gone, you know? I heard in Genoa they don't let this happen in the Italian, ancient city of Genoa. The Italian city, the port side of that is as dangerous and sleazy now as it's ever been. They lead a vibrant, working class life there now, including also other places around the world When you go Istanbul or Buenos Aires, any city that still has this has a vibrant light. Without this, a city becomes a war camp. But in Genoa, they don't allow the port area. It's still very dangerous.

They don't want it to change. They don't allow gentrification, for example. But the shit lib and the social democrat hipster are wrong because it is not gentrification that destroyed all this. It's obesity. I mean, imagine going into neo-noir Los Angeles strip club and it's like a fat bearded guy in cargo shorts is sitting there at a bar and a fat cellulite jiggling bitch on stage. I mean, working class pastimes, working class nightlife has been wiped out. It's obesity and everything that obesity is a sign of, this is what ended all this. It ended all beauty of any kind in lower class American life. And it's hard to understand opioid epidemic, I mean. Tell me if you're a guy in some of these areas of America where literally all the girls are

fat hogs, all of them, 70, 80% fat rate, 55% obesity rate, where any freedom from an existence of work, I mean forget even just the outsourcing and all this and joblessness, but any out from an existence reduced to work, sleep, eat, all exits closed. This movie, Killing of Chinese Bookie, reminded me that Los Angeles, it shows, is gone even, you know? So now, if you want to show Los Angeles noir, you have something like True Detective, which doesn't exist anymore. It shows a fantasy of a noir seductive Los Angeles that doesn't exist. Or the more realistic shows, you have, for example, The Shield, which I enjoy very much. you could say, Nietzschean police officer. But the world depicts very much dystopian science fiction slum world, very much like movie Elysium.

Something almost completely bereft of charm, where Los Angeles, even of the Fletch movies is gone. Watch this. I very much enjoy Fletch. He's a man like Alcibiades, a chameleon able to change shape. I enjoy very much. And of course now, the China virus is really a last stage where they completely reduce everyone to a work camp existence and they just wipe out the working class and middle class especially. Any ability of these as classes of people, I mean, to have an independent existence with even an independent past times and hobbies and social lives. Because like I tell you, they saw what this leads to. First it leads to Nixon and now Trump and the nationalist awakening really across the world. It's an existential threat to the cartel.

and nationalist worldwide awakening – Duterte, Salvini, Bolsonaro – now they really plan to wipe out any chance people might have for an unsurveiled social life. Put a muzzle on them, shut down their businesses, but especially the bars, the nightclubs, which as I've said before, controlled as they might have been, they were still a kind of whole in modern society, unsurveilled a space, however small, of freedom for the lower classes. By the way, also for you, if you want to escape the very tight regimented class of middle class or whatever, regimented life of middle class, any way for them to reach each other outside of art-controlled electronic channels, I mean for the working class, the middle class, Everything of that wiped out.

No ability to talk to each other outside of surveilled electronic channels. Give them a pound of bologna and mayo there. That will stop any future Trump or Bolsonaro or so they think. Will you let them? I do not know. But look, these movies and shows for unclear reasons I watch because I miss Los Angeles. I am not sure why. I told this to Delicious Tacos the other day and he said, well, come over, come back. They're under lockdown and never got out from under it, so I don't think I will go because it's still locked down, but unlike most, I don't have bad impressions of that area. I like the land has an energy of good color and vibrations that come out of the surrounding rock and the sun. I've always liked the feel of it. Some lands are blessed, like southern California,

perfect weather, while other lands, by the way, don't rely on me, check with others, mystical communities, people in Tzu Chi and Feng Shui and so forth who talk about the negative energies arising from the land itself. For example, Tokyo is possibly a cursed and dark place. You feel a heaviness on the land there. Certain parts of American Northeast and I've heard upper Midwest, the forests haunted by something dark, whereas some other places are full of the gods of light. But look, I don't necessarily recommend this movie. Killing of Chinese Bucky, I like Mulholland Drive better, more dreamy feel, we'll be right back. Yes, Caribbean reasons very wholesome taste of frog Twitter for large breasts, for titties. Where has that gone?

Why you prefer this pervert degenerate taste for foot job, for leggings? Is this better, you think? But it's election time, and I guess some people say secession. Even Governor California hinted at this, and I don't think it will happen on either side. I don't think it should. It's a losing path for whoever pursues it now. I criticized before all plans for, for example, any white ethno-state for secession. Because let's say, and I know most of you disagree with that anyway. You're not white nationalists, you don't want white ethno-state. But I'm using it as an example for the sake of argument. Because in that case, the session comes off as a natural, logical desire to you. You might want, okay, I control American government, so I will just let go of California and the

Southwest and they can join with Mexico or become Aslan or whatever they want. Well, what have you achieved? Now you have just let go of the great conquests made by men like Polk in the 19th century and all the work that went into developing a very rich land that was paradise, California paradise let's say 1950s through 1970s and 80s even, you gave it up. So now you're back let's say in a society that is not 50 or 60 percent white as America is now as a whole, but maybe 80 percent white and then you can say, okay, now we will let go of Georgia and give it to the blacks and so on. By the end, you might have a 90% white society again, but you've given up a lot of territory and the problem is it doesn't stop there because how do you keep enemies from inching their

way through again and getting more territories, let's say, in 20 years? So the only way to just stop the same pressures from overtaking you that overtook the Americas of the 1950s and 60s is really to stop this, you need a kind of internal change of faith a change in spirit that can eliminate the spiritual base of the left. And if you can do that, you can also take over a continental America anyway. In other words, a white race or an elite representing white interests that is united and organized to that extent would also be organized enough to just take over America as it is right now and to rule it as a whole and to not give an inch of land that your ancestors fought to achieve. If you prefer to, you can just lord it over the other minorities while maintaining the

cohesion of the white race. Why not? And this has been my criticism of the white nationalist separatists, their small time and all this, but it also applies to all other secessionist arguments, even milder ones based on more mainstream ideologies, whether civic nationalist, Americanist, call it what you want. I might write something on this because it's a longer argument. Let me make a case now for why, first of all, cessation in a situation like America today is historically very rare. In fact, I cannot think of a similar case in the past, and what cessationists on both the left and the right are arguing for, there is no historical parallel. I think, I can't think of anything similar, and second, you shouldn't want it to happen because you may get the worst part of it.

And now on one hand, I want to tell you that arguments for cessation seem natural, however. I remember something from a few years ago. I sat in on a professor's lecture, I forgive if I repeat this story, but it made an impression on me. The professor was seeing nothing untoward. He was saying nothing untoward from a normie point of view. Everything he was saying in content was completely normie-friendly. In fact, he was talking nonsense about civil society and this. But he was a Russian man, raised in Soviet times, heavy Soviet accent, and totally Soviet in manner. So you know, think Putin, this kind of no-nonsense technocratic gruff manner. And so he's there talking in a very Russian straightforward way in front of class, and I look around at faces of these black bitches.

Okay, right, so now you have the entitled college POC, look, okay, so their faces are – I was taken aback when I saw the outrage and the disbelief in their faces, and it was not to do with his content, I doubt they absorbed the word of the material he was saying, but their faces were this at his manner, how shocked they were that he didn't act like a mincing little girl, like a faggot. What is a faggot in the United States today is a man who gives up, who acts like a four-year-old girl who puts up the white flag to signal to the genocracy that he's harmless, that he has given in. And in an academic environment, all male professors are expected to act in this gay intonation in the voice, all young ones at least.

The old ones are given some kind of grandfathered in, so to speak, their considered oddities. Or you have to affect, if you don't do the tilting faggot voice, you have to use this self-doubting hesitation and so forth. And these bitches, these black bitches, they were just not used to this kind of delivery. And at the same time, I knew also a student who talked a lot like Trump, like Donald Trump. Because he was from Long Island, he was a Jersey Shore Italian type. Same thing, same accent and delivery as Jersey Shore. Although you could say he was right leaning, not so much conservative. What is conservative? You know, Trump's base, are they conservative? The base of his base, really, if you go to Soviet Jews in Little Odessa, part of Brooklyn, they went 85% for Trump in the primaries.

It was one of his strongest county or neighborhood or whatever, and he got similar percentages in Long Island. It's the certain kind of New York white ethnics of a particular kind that are really the Trump platform and personality. So this guy, he was like that. student, he liked to wear tank top and he lifted weights, and he talked like Long Island or Jersey Shore Italian. And this was some years before Trump, but he told me, and this was at college, so college people are fags, you know this. But he told me that simply on how he talked, because he did not discuss politics with his friends at all, okay, so simply how he talked, how delivery and manner, he was told he came on too strong. This is maybe ten years ago, so this before real excesses of the second Obama term, when

the social revolution and all the woke stuff that you see now was really taking off. But even before then, this is how they put it, okay, so he just talked in a normal, manly way, but that was coming on too strong. In other words, the spagotization required for entry into upper middle class office world, it's called office, it's called flower language, okay? These oriental decorums in speech and add to it flower manner, flower language and flower manner. The pain that even before the accesses of Obama years, I mean, office flower language, is that a more useful way to describe political correctness, by the way? But even before, let's say, 2014 to 2016, the upper middle class aspiring males, but not just males, females too had to essentially neuter themselves in large part to gain full

social acceptance and full unquestioned entry, I mean, into the middle manager case, towards the middleman class, if you will. And they were already supposed to be transsexual in their soul, if you will. So these are exceptions if you consider, for example, morons like Cuomo on television on CNN, right? Cuomo. He plays the meathead in this. But that role is, in their world, always recognized as a prop, okay? They keep that around for propaganda purposes. Even if you're, let's say, black and you want to enter upper middle class, you have to, in large part, adopt the faggot manner and let go of ghetto speech and so forth. Any sign of working class manner from any ethnic group, unacceptable. If you're Hmong, you know there are a lot of Hmong, these ethnic groups from Vietnam

in large parts of America, California, also in Minnesota, I think, there are Hmong or Tibetans and they act the same way, working class and raised to act like a normal man and that's considered totally unacceptable in so-called elite, so-called occupational classes, I call them society, these strivers with the faggot manners. There are some exceptions, like you can see Komo, but as I keep telling you, these are props that are kept around to counter observations precisely like what I'm making now. Because of course they know it's unpleasant to do to yourself. That's not the talking point for them. So they're aware of this. So they keep around some like Komo or others, principally for purposes of argumentation to the outside. Their role, in other words, is never unquestioned.

It is seen as an unhistorical oddity among this class for a man to act even like Cuomo is acting on CNN. It's something that if you act like that in their private world, it will get you raised eyebrows or comments. And therefore, you can see it's something they intend eventually to phase out, which, okay, why am I telling you these two reasons? First of all because it explains their complete disconnect from the mass of people who haven't joined and either can't or don't want to join their weirdo eunuch world. It explains their inability to communicate at all with people so you get these stiff consultant and advertising agency-created personalities like Abongo or Hillary or Kamel Buttigieg and older politicians are like this, or the equivalent mannequins on the GOP side,

And on the other hand, it explains why someone could contemplate secession because there's no common ground, ultimately possible no common ground between their world and a world any normal person would ever want to dwell in. I mean, you ask me, I want secession then, right? For myself, I would. I'm not joining a place where my wife can, for example, go nuts like Emily Ratajkowski or I don't know how you pronounce this model's name. Whatever her name is, Emily Ratashkovski, the other day she's saying she will raise her child genderless until 18, right? Can only choose gender at the age of 18. So what will this crazy bitch do? Any signs, natural, normal signs that a little girl will show, a little boy, she will beat it out of them, essentially.

Do you remember how a few years ago these people were accusing Putin, Putler, essentially of genocide, because he passed a law that fined you for spreading gay propaganda to kids, right? There were still gay clubs in Moscow or wherever gays were not touched, but just because you were fined for teaching this to children, he was about to genocide the gays, okay? So now you excoriate him as backward, but you have the actual tyranny and dystopian assault on who knows how many kids who are having their lives destroyed as children, They're getting tranny estrogen shots at the age of 8 or 9. Or even when they're not getting the chemical castration treatments, they're raised by a psycho bitch mom like this who says they're genderless, which means what?

Any natural normal expression of let's say masculinity or femininity that they may have will get essentially beaten or scolded out of them. And it's plainly a form of abuse, such as didn't even take place even among the worst totalitarian excesses of the 20th century. Nothing like this took place even in Soviet Union or in Nazi Germany. It's beyond anything. So what's being done to some kids in America now, what's going to be done even more broadly, right? I understand the cessation or the desire for it, for this and many other reasons. The two Americas seem to have diverged so much past the point of reconciliation and ways of life. And you just see these latest contrasting images of Biden and Trump rallies. Trump retweeted tonight.

It's a kind of a double shot Trump rally on top video of surreal Biden so-called rally, if you can call it that, on bottom where he's doing this little jig on the stairs. And you see the different atmosphere, the different manners and so on. And that the unwritten law of manners is far more of a cleft in a society than any written law. Read any, let's say, pre-modern philosopher talk about what is foundation of a political state. It is the unwritten law, much more than the written law. And what is the unwritten law that cannot be questioned? It is habit. It is manner. And you look at the unconscious manner even of Trump world versus the people who would stomp for Biden at least, it's a huge cleft, right? This is more than two different countries, it's becoming two species of men.

And then of course, what I just mentioned, the fundamental disagreement on even what is a man, what is a woman, or if this should even exist. And in America right now, there's even a straightforward path for secession. You might think, OK, this is a motive, and there's a mechanism for it also through the states. It's very obvious. If Kamala wins, or if she ever becomes president in the 2020s, or anyone like her, AOC or some other nutjob, what will stop a state like Texas or North or South Dakota from just refusing to enact their psycho decrees? Will she be able to muster an army to stop them from succeeding in all but name? And same if Trump wins now, as I think he will, no jinx, but I think he will, you must direct psychic power to his win.

I will encourage you until election time, I will have other show next, this coming weekend and also election eve public broadcast. But after Trump win, what will stop California or similar from seceding? Saying no, we will never harm our Mexican pets with deportation. No, you cannot stop us from saying whites are evil and so forth. What will stop them? In other words, the mechanism of the states and state governments, secession or national dismemberment can take place in this way, in the same way the Soviet Union broke apart, right? The local governments voted for independence. So what would stop it in the United States? Well, now that I lay out the case for why and how of secession, let me say brief on rest of show why actually I think this very unlikely to happen, and if you see motions

that way, why you shouldn't want it to in any case, would be a lot more unpleasant than it sounds. Would you be ready for war? Because would come war one way or another. War would come. Yes, the lilting, elite voice, yes. If you are an aspiring striver male who has adopted this tilting, lilting voice of the faggot, what will stop you from allowing your wife to castrate your son, you know? I mean, the spiritual transsexualism precedes the chemical one, but I don't want to discuss this any longer. Just as I record this, there's another nigger uprising in Philadelphia this time, a ghastly city, Philadelphia, just next to no redeeming qualities for the city. Spirit of darkness, a fog of darkness always on it.

I was there a few times, I was haunted by a mentally ill girl I talk about on the first show actually, on pilot of Caribbean Rhythms, but there's nothing good there, Philadelphia, except Rittenhouse Square, some people like, and Marrakesh Restaurant, they do eight-course Moroccan meal with happy ending, I'm not allowed to say. But will this give Pennsylvania to Trump for certain this uprising now in Philadelphia? Who knows? I think so, maybe, but I think there's no way Biden can win other than just massive vote stealing. And really what will happen if them governors, Democrat governors in these swing states, if they just decide to withhold election results, past, let's say, January 21, then it goes to Congress, I think. Can they do this?

They have massive support from the security state, from the oligarchs and from their deranged middle-aged woman followers that they mobilize with their idols, you know, so they mobilize the orcs, so why not? Will they make their move now? But if they do, you must understand they're going for all of it. They're not ultimately interested in something like secession. And one way or another, you will have to go to war with them. This must be clear to you, I mean, the problem with all secession arguments in America today is what you're looking at here is not two peoples arranged against each other within a state, two historical peoples or ethnies, at which point secession would be possible with violence or not, but you're looking instead at a ruling or an occupational class as I

call them, and a minority which is set against the people. And when you secede from a ruling, or in this case a usurper class, that's called a revolution or a civil war. In 1917, in Russia, the whites, the monarchists and their allies, they did not want to secede from the Reds. It was a war for the soul of all of Russia, because they knew no secession would be possible. The Reds, which were very much actually a conspiracy of a minority party, but they would never stop. They would never be happy with their parcel of land to live their way of life. They would never leave you alone. They would pursue you in whatever state you carved out, and even beyond, because a revolutionary ideology like that, the modern leftism, it never sleeps. It seeks to change and conquer the world.

And any examples that exist on the outside of them that refuse to submit to their way are seen as a rebuke, so they cannot tolerate them. Stalin was revolutionary. He had his sights set on the world, by the way, don't believe that Stalin versus Trotsky contrast is not real. This why Stalin, what he did in Spain, he was not interested in being a good nationalist. He was going to invade Europe, too. By the way, I don't think anybody denies that, whether in the 1940s or 1950s, Stalin was going to try at least to invade Europe. He had tens of thousands of tanks ranged on its borders. So now, why they, and I mean the globalists right now, why they go after Belarus, for example? Small, insignificant, pipsqueak country. I don't know, what do they grow, they lumber?

A friend pointed out the other day, did you know Belarus was one of the only states that did not lock down? You know, and you could even get in as a foreigner with 14-day quarantine, but they really had no problems with that. They, along with a few other states like Sweden, Uruguay and Iceland, that never really locked down, they solved the crisis quite nicely, the COVID crisis. But unlike the others I mentioned, who, for example, in case of Uruguay at least, they did it low-key, and in any case, Uruguay and Iceland are out of the way of world politics and events. But the IMF tried to blackmail Belarus into lockdowns. Belarus does not have that latitude of freedom from world politics because they're in East Europe, right? And whoever controls East Europe controls the world island.

Look that up, who said that? But the IMF made loans, I think, conditional to Belarus on that, that they ended lockdowns and when they refused, it was color revolution time in Belarus. So you know, okay, this is a small example, but the point is a revolutionary ideology will not leave you alone. Whether it's the Reds in Russia 1917 or in Spain in the 1930s, they want the whole thing. They want to see nuns raped and priests shot, they want to see your sons castrated, whatever. Leftism is revolutionary world movement and religion, and they're not interested in mere secession. Now, I'm not saying they can do it, they're not nearly as strong as they imagine themselves, Many more than ISIS could conquer the world, by the way, but their insane desire is there

and they won't stop in trying to do so, they will cause massive damage. People who say, accelerate, wait it out, well, Soviet Union lasted 70 years, destroyed countless lives in countries, left them permanently damaged, so let me ask you this, suppose California and a few other states are allowed to succeed, right? Good riddance, you would say, okay, Trump wins. There are monster riots in Los Angeles if he tries to round up illegals and California secedes. Good riddance, you say. Get fucked, California fags. But not so fast. Because I would say the majority even of California are normal people like you. Even when they vote for the Dems, by the way, which they might do in some cases for personal or for family reasons or just because they're dumb or do it for status or because they don't

care. California are normal red state type people, especially in the interior and so forth. So they will be targeted under a woke one party regime, even though they think they wouldn't be, even the leftists might be. So will you let the government of California, which is now unleashed from any external constitutional control or federal government, would you let them dispossess and humiliate people like you? say they can leave, but they can migrate to the new red America. There can be an exchange of populations, maybe even, but not so fast. Will the new government of California allow this? Are you so sure? And do you remember when India got partitioned and the English left, and they split India into Muslim and Hindu, you could say, although not really because a lot of Muslims remained

in the Hindu part. So Pakistan was split off from India in 1947, and in those population migrations of that population exchange, one million people died. Are you ready for such changes? And if they refuse, for example, to let them leave, which I assure you they will, they will not let the red normal Americans from the seceded California leave, they will essentially reduce them to overt slavery as opposed to the subtle slavery that exists now. Will you allow this? If they invade homes and take children away, as they surely would, by the way, they would do that now to you if they could, will you just say, well, we wanted secession so each of us could decide their own way of life, national sovereignty, I believe in this, would you say that? I don't think so.

I mean, how far would you let them go if they put, let's say, middle class whites into to reeducation camps like they say they want to do to you. Like Bill Ayers said, and they want to, they really, they've been saying this, this fantasy for decades. I know Reds in, I mean Marxists, the Reds in government right now, with major positions in the federal bureaucracy who fantasize about killing millions of Whites. I'm not exaggerating for a second, even for comedic effect, okay? Will you let them? In some cases, will you let them treat your cousins or more remote relatives this way? And if they decide to let China build a base in San Francisco, will you be okay with that? And let's say then you play as a consistent nationalist as you think you can do, okay?

I'm not a nationalist in this sense, by the way, never was. I think America should arm the Boers in South Africa. I think it should arm many of the South American white elites, for example. And in this case, would you not at least try to arm the Red Staters who are trapped behind in California, or something like that, or whatever? And will you jail those among us who will arm them? If we do arm them, will the crazy commie state of California declare war? But look, let's say you do all of these things, you play the consistent nationalist. The point is the other side, they will go to war with you anyway, okay? Just think of what a Kamala-led America would be like. Right now, I mean America as a whole. You don't need to think very hard.

Hillary Clinton would have gone to war at the very least over Syria, but very likely gone to several kinds of war with Russia proxy wars, or who knows who else, several by now. Because in its death throes, this degenerate woke empire lashing out around the world blindly, okay? You know, Kamala would do this, right? Everyone knows they would do this. They would just start war after war. This is what Hillary Clinton regime would have been like. This is what Kamala would do now if she could. I mean, these people want to bomb Russia or even Congo or wherever they could for perceived transgressions against their chosen groups, against gay rights, for example. Yes, we joke about this, but we all know that they would go on their worldwide universal sodomy crusade.

And if they do that against Russia or Kosovo on the other side of the world for whatever reason, you think that a woke revolutionary coastal state seceded California. You think they would allow Red America to oppress their chosen next door? You may say we intend to oppress no one, but that's not how they would see it. If you ban, for example, the trans propaganda to children, if you stop doctors from maiming them with chemical estrogen poisonings. So this is really a core matter for us, maybe even more than the race thing, because really it's a terminal event for a civilization to allow this abuse of children in this way. But you know they put sanctions over that kind of thing if you stop doctors from disfiguring people in general with trans surgery, which you should.

That kind of thing is a war crime to them, okay? So I'm not even touching the other things, just this one, but whether you cover abortion or affirmative action, right, or the grotesque lies that would be made up about how you oppress blacks and minorities because you, nearly because you allow policing, right, just allowing policing or because you don't practice racial quotas in hiring and economic redistribution or whatever. This would lead very quickly to a racially stratified society if you get rid of affirmative action and these essentially quota systems that exist right now, much more racially stratified even than it is now. And what you do doesn't even need to be sterner policing than they use. The results of your new America, the free America, it doesn't need to result in more

inequalities than they would have in California. They would just lie, you know that. They lied as a cause of war. They lied about many things. You know they lied about Kosovo, yes? I mean there were no Serbian rape gangs or this, it was completely made up. It is really the Serbs trying to protect the oldest part of their country from being ripped away from them by Albanian squatters, who were burning churches and importing, in some cases al-Qaeda, but in any case importing international gangsterism. Taking Kosovo away from Serbia, which happened in 1999, equivalent would be to taking Texas away from America. Only consider if Texas had been part of America since the 1300s. Now, it was done in the name of human rights.

This case of Kosovo, right, I'm giving to you, even America during Clinton, which was comparatively sane to what a Kamala administration would be. But they did this. They went against Serbia in the name of human rights. Some say for a pipeline, whatever, it doesn't matter, but the public justification was human rights and maybe the desire to humiliate Russia. And they bombed Serbia for 90 days. They killed civilians. They bombed bridges in Belgrade. They were frothing at the mouth. Listen to what Madeleine Halfbright or what Richard Holbrooke said about the Serbs. And that was, what, 20 years ago. For no clear national interest, they went to war with Serbia. So look, you think they would tolerate you living a different way from them if America breaks apart. They would not.

to just lead to war. A revolutionary, religious regime will not let faraway places live in peace. You think they will leave a hated and feared neighbor live unmolested on their border? You think they will let you restore any normal life? Not without a war. One way or another, they want blood. So all you will do through secession is they will consolidate their position and give them time to attack from stronger position, probably to rally foreign support against you as well. Because it's not clear at all who would inherit foreign alliances, foreign trade and all this. Who would inherit the dollar, by the way? Because this brings up also other big problem with secession, the economic reset that would take place.

And what would come out as the other side of a huge economic reset is not clear at all. But I talk about this a little bit on next segment. I'll be right back. Commercial break, please. Brennan, go commercial. I said I would talk some historical examples of cessation, but tell me which. Which historical example would be like this proposed breakup of America? Because in fact the states, although the states would be a natural mechanism by which such cessation takes place, but in fact the boundaries between the states in America are mostly fake. People move around a lot, there are families in various states, friends, they don't really their own local culture, in a way, let's say you have in Italy, South Tyrol, I was watching

tennis the other day, new tennis player, Yannick Sinner, very handsome German ginger, from Italy, South Tyrol state, look him up, very powerful, he will become, I think, very powerful tennis player. But it's ethnically German, this area of Italy, called South Tyrol. For how you hear Yugoslavia, different sort of ethnic homelands, even though Belgrade you had various ethnic groups living in Belgrade, and even though you had, for example, Croats living in Bosnia, so it was not a one-to-one, but they still had recognizable ancestral ethnic homelands. Whereas the borders of the states in America are not only fake or porous in that sense, But they don't correspond really to any historical or linguistic identities that could break off from one another.

The cleavages in America are not territorial. There are actually blue cities more than blue states. And even in the blue cities there are large numbers who don't belong to the blue faction. But the bigger problem is that I cannot think of a state or an empire in history that broke apart like this. in cessation I mean, over ideological beliefs or beliefs about what is moral and is not. They break up over ethnic differences in friendly way or not or they break up over monies sometimes. My favorite story, one of my favorite books is Nostromo by Joseph Conrad. It tells a story of fictional country. Joseph Conrad made up Costa Guana but it was based on his time in Venezuela and it's funny The story he tells, and this is, I think, 1906, more than a hundred years ago, and it's

still the story of Latin America today. Do you hear that, leftoids? Even before there was CIA, the cycle of coup, counter-coup, attempted secession, this took place in South America for more than a hundred years, okay? So nothing changes. You read Joseph Conrad, and it's a South America of today. But in this book, it's a story of secession and the birth of a new republic. So how happens in this book, Nostromo, it's this stagnant, extremely corrupt South American basket case, Costa Guana, that's a stand-in for basically any South American country. And the silver mine is revived by an Englishman born there. You know how the English, they do this wherever they go. In north Portugal, there are port plantations, call them whatever, port vineyards, fortified

port wines that the English traditionally love. And the English port houses have been English for hundreds of years. This is in north Portugal, very beautiful area. But they study in England, they still marry English, I believe. But the English do this in many different countries. So this Englishman in Costa Guana, he revives the mine and this, well, you should read it. It's maybe one of the top novels ever. But basically, the rich and progressive, in a good sense now, the rich and better progressive part of the country, Costa Guana, secedes from the rest. They want to be rich and not be pilfered and taxed, and they don't want to deal with the dysfunction, the Latinx corrupt bureaucracy and dysfunction. So they secede.

And you see a lot of impulses for secession come from this motivation, although they're more often just impulses and not successful. For example, Catalonia is enormously rich in Spain and they want to secede. Gobineau, the steampunk father of racism, he calls them the only masculine and practical people on the Mediterranean, the Catalans. Similar to the Germanics, he says they have a Teutonic spirit. But so yes, the Catalans want to secede because they're rich and they think they're bankrolling the rest of Spain and they don't want to. I don't agree with that, but in England, the Scots, they want now to secede because of the oil wealth. In Italy, Salvini, who is now his great nationalist now for all of Italy, we all want him to win,

but his Lega, his party began as Lega Nord, which is a secessionist movement because North Italy, which is long one of the richest areas in the world, I think running on 2,000 years, It's been consistently one of the wealthiest parts of the world, North Italy, the Milan area, but it doesn't want its money going to Rome, to the corrupt government in Rome, or to fund, as they see it, the poor of South Italy, which is much poorer than they are, and who they call Afrikani, and they, you know, they consider them Negroians. So you know, the Normans actually are, I disagree with this take about South Italy. I'm a fan of South Italy. The Normans colonized Sicily around 1100 or so, and whether for a zet reason or another,

maybe it's the ancient Greek holdovers, but you find actually many blondes in Sicily, more than you'd expect. People don't know this, Catania, many blondes. But anyway, the north of Italy now, they wanted to secede, partly for economic reasons but also some cultural, and it was going to be called Padania, a new nation. But so this is frequent desire. You can even consider breakup of Yugoslavia to have some similar motivation. Excuse me, they attack me now. But in some cases of Yugoslavia breakup, when you look at Slovenia, where Melania's from, so she comes from ancient divinity cults there, Mother Goddess divinity. I talk about this before. I'm surprised that opposition to Trump never looked into Melania's family from Slovenia.

She comes from an ancient kind of mid-summer cult stretching back to Roman times, but Slovenia are relatively wealthy, very close to Austria type culture. They like schnitzel and this and they're interested in money and business and they didn't even want to get too involved in the dumb wars and this, but okay, Yugoslavia case slightly different but I don't know of a case where a nation big or small it break up over what amount really in the end to religious fervor of one side and really one minority and the pets they imported as muscle from abroad and the desire of the other side, even the majority, to escape that religious fanaticism but when otherwise it's the same language, the same people and where there is no territorial line that's clear.

I'm drawing a blank, what would be historical similarity? I've been drunk for two days, maybe that's why I draw a blank. But tell me what historical example you're following that would be relevant to this case, because I only see parallels of civil war with 1917 or 1789 being analogues, or as I would hope, Spain 1936 or 39, where the good guys won, or Chile 1973 or Argentina in the 1970s. Argentina, in the turbulent 1970s, it also had some very strong regional differences where there were some parts of Argentina, like Tucumán in the north, that were very left-marxoid leaning, and the Argentine military essentially went in there and crushed them. So you might say this exists right now in America, same thing, but secession was never on the table there for either side. It couldn't be.

Too much interpenetration is really not a secession issue. This is a blood issue, a life and death issue. The left will not accept secession. This is a winner-take-all situation whether you like it or not. And so, speaking of wealth and what I mentioned on the previous segment, consider also this. Where American wealth comes from right now? Where American wealth? I know there's been decline in living standards for middle class and working class since 1970s. Very bad. I talked this on opening of show and many other time, but think how much worse it would be if the dollar was not a world reserve currency. It would degenerate to Congo levels very fast, Haiti levels. Now maybe that's a good thing. It would be a total reset and it would force America to reform its economic life entirely.

But I say you do not know what would come out the other side of such a crisis. There's no way to predict that. I used to like Peter Schiff, now he gets repetitive. And I listen to his show, he's a good debater, and if he's right about one thing, it's that America has a phony economy, fake economy. Now Trump to some extent is trying to reform that without causing a complete crash. By bringing back, he tried bringing back manufacturing and this, and put America back on real economic footing. And he succeeded, was on the path to succeeding until crisis of this year. But even so, even with Trump reforms, much work would have to be done. Until then, America has found the economy based on consuming GDP, mostly because GDP,

activity because women buy consumer goods with husband and government money, and they buy consumer goods produced by China and others. But most jobs in America are consumption jobs. Service industry, that's a phony economy. A service industry job represents consumption, not production. The legitimate question to be asked about America economy, how can America sustain its enormous decades-long trade deficits? Actually a country cannot do that. An analogy to a business, it goes out of business if it tries that. In other words, why do other countries send you their stuff, their material goods while you send them back what? What do you send them? They don't need your waiters or your lawyers. For all my buffoonery and skills, call me an entertainer at least.

But what I do is more transferable abroad than that of many people with supposedly serious jobs in America. At least I can make somebody in Japan or Australia or Germany laugh, you know, they buy my show. But they don't need and cannot use your output as an American lawyer even, or whatever. But that's the thing, most America's jobs are make-work jobs, they produce nothing of value even in terms actually of services to Americans. So lawyers arguably represent important social function, but tell me what the HR industry does, human resources, it's a giant scheme to hire women minorities as a result of government regulation. How much of a job given to black shiboons in America, but really let's say to women

in general, let me not pick on the shiboons, how many of these jobs are just a result of government regulation and represent a circuitous form of welfare, but in fact serve no economic function, a negative function, produce nothing that could be exported and actually not even Any service worth enjoying, like maybe a prostitute would, or even a waitress. It's OnlyFans, right? That's the future. Just whore your daughters out online, then. This is future. That can be exported at least. Don't laugh. Okay? This weekly standard was running articles essentially calling for an OnlyFans princess economy. They want you to whore your daughter out. But what were America chief exports before Trump? It was fraudulent financial instruments and pornography.

I exaggerate a little bit, but before Trump writes this, what America exported, and maybe some military hardware. But you know, late Soviet Union also export very good military hardware. And you can add oil, wheat, same as late Soviet Union, maybe figs, whatever. Maybe not. One figure that always stuck in my mind, Peter Schiff says America is surrounded by oceans, import 95% of its seafood. Now tell me why the rest of the world will send you their fish even, but you send them back what? This is the question. If you have Apple computer and this iPhone and you say, yes, that is very good, by the way, it doesn't get manufactured in America or did not before Trump when manufactured in China. But the problem is America is how many, 300 or 400 million people now and a few companies

like Apple is not enough per capita. Can America be said, let's say I keep having to qualify before Trump, but still largely so now, can America be said to produce more than Cold War Bulgaria produced per capita I mean? For a nation of 400 million people or however, don't laugh at Bulgaria. They make very good tanks and artillery. Look, sorry if I repeat myself, but this is problem. America does not produce nearly enough to justify its massive imports. So there's this trade deficit, and why can this deficit be sustained? Because other countries want your dollars. Only reason. And they want your dollars in the end because of one thing only. And this is America's only real export. It's military power. It's because other countries fear and respect your military that you have dollar reserve

currency. So in the end, in a perverse way that I hate to admit, the NATO cocks, the military industrial complex cucks, the internationalist cucks, in a perverse sense they are right because without America's military all over the world, the American dollar goes to zero and the living standard of most Americans, as bad as it is now, it will go Congo level. Now Schiff and other libertarians think this is a good thing because it would lead to pain, enormous pain for a year or two, and then America certainly does have the resources to reset and to put its economy on a real footing, okay? But as I tell you, you don't know what come out the other side of such a crisis. Peter Schiff, he very optimistic to think that.

Will you be sure it is Trump rebuilding America on sound economic footing, or will it be someone like AOC lording over Haiti or America degenerating into warlord states? I don't know. And in the event of a cessation, what I mean to tell you is who would keep the dollar? Would the dollar sustain its worldwide status as reserve currency? Who would keep the military and the nuclear weapons? Who would keep any equitable or reasonable division of these things, these vital national resources? You're assuming on the other side a reasonableness and a goodwill that doesn't exist. They're batshit, okay? So at the very least, the secession would lead to this long-dreaded, or long-awaited economic reset, and nobody knows enough to plan for what would result from this.

What would come the other side of this crisis, war, at the very least, you can bet on it. War between red and blue Americas, and war worldwide, probably. And maybe this is a good thing. Maybe you can maybe support secession then, I mean, as a means to this end, because it's It's possible I think that that could be what triggers the new global dark age, the collapse of its center in America, same as at the end of the international system, at the end of the Bronze Age, whatever caused that, and I believe it was maybe a series of similar mistakes by the elites of that time that led to economic collapse and the coming of the sea peoples that just wiped out a degenerate international civilization. To me and my friends, this is not a dark age, but a time of opportunity. That's what it would be.

I look forward to this. Do you, though? But I look forward because, you know, the mines, the mines, I'm talking where they take the resources out of the earth, that ultimately everything in modern society needs the metals, the metals that come from inside the earth. The ore is too deep now because of the extensive mining that has already taken place. So the ore is too deep to be mined by people without know-how, which you don't have the machinery and if you don't know where to look, if you don't know how to extract very deep ore, you can rebuild society. You cannot rebuild civilization after a collapse. So the next collapse is likely to be permanent or close to. Imagine 10,000 years of heroic pirate and warlord hobbyists all around the world, warlord hobbies.

This is the sieve through which mankind returned to a eugenic path, maybe. So maybe I welcome it. Maybe I welcome a eugenic heroic age of 10,000 years of war. And at the far end, I see the tall spires of Atlantis rising out of a great ocean. And now I remember it. Yes, let it return. I remember the cities rising out of mists of ocean.