Welcome to Caribbean Rism, episode 61, Presente por la Patria. Do you know what this is? It's a slogan, Presente por la Patria, a slogan, look up Roberto Dubuisson. I don't know how you say with Spanish pronunciation, but he is a great defender of El Salvador. He is a defender of democratic normal values, I think he said, the rules-based international order. Just like Kissinger, Clinton, this now is Blowtorch Bob from El Salvador. Blowtorch Bob Roberto de Boussaint, which I think El Salvador right now has sassy Palestinian president, very nice man, Naeib Bukele, was one of the first world leaders to put a very strong COVID protections when pandemic first burst out into, I think he did it as early as February, March. He's a Palestinian Christian, I believe, and their food is very good.

Some say too vinegary, but I like sour foods, whereas the best Middle Eastern food I think is Iraqi. This is what I hear. Do not tell Naseem Taleb. He has some neuroses about this. He doesn't want people to refer to Lebanon as Middle East. He says Iraq is the Middle East. But Iraqi food I think is possibly superior, and I tell you this, I feel poisoned. And I think some type of week or two week food poisoning, although a friend suggested that I may have been subjected to microwave attack, radio wave, high frequency radio wave attack, as I see it. You know, many American and other diplomats around the world have been destroyed, they destroy the brain and nervous system by this, and as you know, I am a diplomat of the Antarctic a regime based around Lake Vostok in Antarctica.

Look this up, Antarctic Houdebou. I'm in a place now with Lebanese labs, and I get a hankering for their spices and such, right? Because otherwise, everything here is unflavored meat and potatoes, this. But every time I try Lebanese food here, I get a reaction. You know this? Can I talk this? Michael Savage, he gives similar stories where he go to Chinese restaurant in San Francisco, and he says his lips shut tight in allergic reaction. It sounds horrible, but of course, I believe this, the seed oils that they use, which are possibly years, they're years old, they're all rancid, they're hydrogenated, and the MSG and other things, but all Chinese-American food is fried in sewer oil. I don't know I'm telling you the truth.

I have this information from Hakan and many other reliable sources, but when people have tried pranks, calling, for example, health inspector on Chinese restaurant. And then when health inspector got there, they found things far worse than the pranksters claimed. Look, I need to talk softer. I need to take easy today, you know, I must conserve energy, but I have no doubt most of Chinese eatery should be shut down a national matter of national security, public health is possible. this pandemic was spread entirely through Chinatowns and I would do the same by the way with hostels in general. I think I said this before, but I wrote once to the Mexican military in very ornate Spanish a request to immediately shut down all the hostels in Mexico City as a public health

disturbance and an assault also on aesthetic sensibility. So anyway, these are my ambitions to insert myself into Latinx American politics in this way, into the political life of Cretino America, as you may know, and I've long had a fantasy of leading ethnic boycotts of Chinese eateries and supermarkets in Argentina. And how did I get this idea? Because I eat once, I remember it, this was before Trump, many of you have known me since before then, five years ago many of you remember this episode where I was poisoned by disgusting Chinese dump that served me sewer creature, and I had many days reactions I could barely walk. I just had fantasies of breaking its windows in retaliation. But I always, then you know, I think big, right? I think big. Instead of just attacking one restaurant,

why not lead a city-wide ethnic boycott and such? Same with serial killer. I always found serial killer to be a very small, a very small thing, small-minded. It's too, it's, I want to go to a psychiatrist and I told once a woman psychiatrist just to see how she would I told her, you know, I think only way to be an artist today is to become a serial killer. This only path for me for artistic expression. But then when you reconsider it, it's always small time. It's too personal, the serial killer thing, right? So when you read Marquis de Sade, there are some more ambitious projects such as poisoning entire fields of grass where people lie down in a picnic. I would never do this, of course, but this is what people celebrate, they had movies

celebrating Marquis de Sade, Quills I think, but they don't tell you this, they don't tell you this side of things. But anyway I always say think big, you know, so these ethnic boycotts that used to happen in New York in the 19th century, please don't look up that story of who it was who led some of the biggest ethnic boycotts and riots against the mix, against the, he called them the slaves of the Pope. It might just break the Ellis Island fraternity apart if you look up who led some of these ethnic boycotts. 19th century, it was a German Jew by the way, it's very funny. So like Saylor says, and so much of Ashky resentment against the blonde goy is actually retconned resentment against the German Jew, inherited through family stories and this,

but it turned from the German Jew to the wasp instead. The German Jew was called the Jäke. So much of the granddaddy didn't get into the social club and these stories is because the German Jews would not let the unwashed Ostjuder, these are the Jews from the Polish territories and West Russia, it wouldn't let them into their social clubs. So of course you cannot say this now because the myth of solidarity against the man, the wasp against Whitey, right, this is a myth of solidarity so they pretend it's the wasp who did this instead of the German Jew, you'd be surprised. Some of the stories I hear, by the way, of grown men like Bill Kristol, can I talk about this? Bill Kristol, who only has a job because of his daddy, by the way, what is that?

Can you imagine that if your father is a pundit and you become a pundit too, it's a bit strange to me. It's like going to be a shoe cobbler, it's the family business, you know, now you inherit the name and the brand, I guess, but I'd be embarrassed to do it. You know, I never had that. My father did not insist that I follow in his career and neither did his father before him. It just sounds so medieval, right? So if you look at Syrian Jews, for example, who have department stores or any of these middlemen minorities from that nearest part of the world, the Armenian or the Persian rug merchant, and they get their kids to inherit the family business. It has, you know, this very parochial flavor, right?

But somehow people in the United States, where you're supposed to be individualistic culture, that you choose your own path, but people think it's normal that you have these generational pundit business. So you have Bill Kristol inherited the family rug merchant store, the punditry business. And then, of course, there's Pat Klaaritz. And I think Pat Klaaritz, not just father and son, but there's a nephew or a cousin or something who's on Twitter. So it's like a whole, you know, there's Jonah Goldberg, look up his mother. I'm sorry, it's racist of me to say these things, but it just sounds so medieval and nepotistic. It's very trat, right, this whole thing. These are people who instead champion the idea of liberal individualism but not in their own careers or families.

These are all just barely above average IQ guys who've never had an original idea, never written something you'd want to read. If it was a non, you would never read them if they were anonymous. People only read them because it's based on the family name, so it's quite bizarre that normal Americans just accept this. It's not just a matter of parents helping children. But specifically of following in the footsteps of your father. I know you may think that is trad, but I find something a bit off-putting about it. I don't know in the realm especially of what is supposed to be argument based on ideas or personal style and not on family or ethnic patronage. And what I'm saying, I suppose this would be barely excusable if such people at least showed gratitude.

But from stories, stories I hear now, Bill Kristol acts like any college girl playing the woman card. If he's contradicted or something, you can see he has no emotional control. He's made to cry very easily in public and he's always ready to play the ethnic card and essentially to say he's an oppressed minority. He's oppressed by the man and anti-Semitism card and this is very unseemly coming from a guy who followed in the family branded who otherwise, okay, I won't say he would be serving you a pickle in a diner, but you'd be an accountant in upstate New York or something. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but, well look, where was I? So look up who actually led some of the biggest anti-immigrant sentiment in 19th century New York and these ethnic rights, it's not who you think.

Which brings up other oddities I've mentioned on this show before. For example, in an American context alone, it's how German Jews were actually quite welcomed in America and never really had tensions with locals, and largely also intermarried with them by the way, as did the Sephardics who arrived in the south, mainly they intermarried into the southern gentry. So this whole WASP Jew thing is real, you know, so it's not much talked about story, excuse if I repeat myself, but the problem America seems to have with ethnic groups comes from the unusual 1880 to 1920 cohort from the region between Poland and West Russia, which had a very tense relationship with the other Jewish groups already in America, not just with the WASP and so on, which, you know, that's another interesting story.

Maybe I'll talk that some other. As you can see, I don't want to talk election, right? I'm not going to do election sports ball for this episode on different things. Look, the whole election thing. Things have been happening behind back door for over a month now, maybe longer. I don't, I can't tell you anything new. We'll see what happens. I think that Flynn and Trump should have called the people into the streets because after all, men like Alito and others are merely human. But who knows? Maybe they have been promised better protection from behind the scenes and you don't need to have people blockading the street. I wanted to see trucker rallies in this. You know, I wanted to see all these things because even if Trump wins, I think he has

decent chance now that there's motion in that direction, energy shifts daily. But today, as I record this, there's energy in Trump direction. But even if Trump wins, he wants to be in a position where he can just crush opposition and make lasting changes. And then it helps you if you have the MAGA armies, so to speak, the MAGA people mobilized essentially in the city streets, blockading some DC, blockading Atlanta, places like this. But I do not run messaging on this. You know, all I can do is tell you what can I tell you about current events? Just be careful regarding the vaccine, so-called, OK? Because you have to look at what these people have done over the last few years alone. Since 2015, Merkel has flooded her nation to the extent that the youths of Germany are

right now made a minority in their own country. Now you have to think how insane that is. Hitler didn't do anything this insane, and I will stand by what I just said. It's not an exaggeration. What Merkel did is far beyond what people like Hitler or Stalin did in terms of population manipulation and so forth. moved populations around, they both committed genocides, mass political murder, but nothing of the sort where you apparently want to permanently change the demographics of your own country. It's almost unheard of, right? The only historical parallels I can think I mentioned on previous show where certain Sicilian tyrants did this and for the same reason because they wanted to dilute the citizen base of the territories they controlled so they could more easily control them.

It's easier to control a mixed territory. And so what Merkel is doing, which is to bust open the borders of Europe and lower wages, and these are the political and financial goals of self invading your own territories, I don't know, it's very rare, it's very crazy. And it might not just be malicious, it might be worse than malicious, it might be stupid. And so you have to think, people who are stupid enough to do things like that, there is nobody at the wheel. Like I say, nobody at the wheel. So do you trust your life, your family's life, to these people who develop a vaccine in record time for a disease similar to SARS, and there was never any vaccine for SARS, and in fact, such vaccines look up the particular type of vaccine used this time, right? It's an RNA vaccine.

It's never been used before. I don't know, do you want to roll the dice with the people who would do things like invade their own countries or seriously propose economic policies? I remind you, after 2008, many were proposing things like burning empty houses. In their opinion, this would have solved the problem of falling property prices. And these are stupid people, do you trust them? I would say, look, there's so little I can say about that without so-called Fed postings. So I want to talk other historical matter and a stream of consciousness show, so let me go back to this problem. So I was telling you this whole problem in America with certain ethnic group, it comes from 1880, 1920 cohort in that case, and by the way, in the case of the Irish, it wasn't

just this kind of diffuse bigotry against people who look different. The Irish men broke the prisons in New York and other places where they came in the late 19th century. There were so many Irish men in prisons that they couldn't hold, they broke the alms houses. These are the charity houses. The so-called Ellis Island fraternity caused very serious problems in America, which is why there was WASP native reaction against them. They always say, oh, the WASP is not native to America. Well, do you think the Native American wants more immigrants coming from whatever, Europe, Africa, Mexico now? I don't think so. But in any case, look, maybe I'll talk about that sometimes, this very special 1880, 1920 cohort, what's different about them. They were all radicalized by Marxism.

There's a very special scene in Fiddler on the Roof that was deleted in the final version of the movie. But the messianic Marxism was very hot among that group that came to America during that time. So look, maybe I talk about that sometime. But very little understood story, how after the partition of Poland, Russia inherited a kind of poison pill. Russia was a very backward empire, and it took over Poland, a country that was considerably more literate and advanced. And whenever you do this, it creates all kinds of problems. And much of what happened after that in the 1800s in Russia history was Russia trying to find various patchwork solutions to cordon off this Polish problem that it swallowed and it could never digest. It could never digest the Polish problem.

And it's interesting story and the pail of settlement thing, the shtetl sob story and the Jewish story, it's part of this bigger problem Russia faced. But again, maybe this full show in the future. So yes, I have reactions to Lebanese food, which is milder than Palestinian Christian food, less sour. So I cannot eat it here, I'm on meat and potatoes, or lately I just eat plain rice, I can't eat anything else. So I guess on next segment, or later in show, I will tell you about foods and supplements and some dangers and so forth that you may not know about. But until then, if you ask me about elections and future of America, what I can tell you, than look up Roberto Dobuisson, a great man, blowtorch Bob, he knows how to deal with communists. But what can I tell you other than that?

Again, we'll see how it turns out, as I keep telling you. But the future of America, and you will learn the future of America from studying the El Salvador of Dobuisson, or like my friend Lady Astor say on last show, you look up Jose Lopez rega from Argentina and what happened there in the 1970s before as a military dictatorship. I've discussed before on this show the disturbances. I don't think America can escape that fate at this point, no matter who wins, and actually I never did. I never thought America could escape that. I can't even name what it is. All I've been trying to do for some time politically, I mean, is to prepare friends for the time that will come. It's very funny, by the way. who is anti-communist hero from El Salvador.

When I post the Bison or others like Alfredo Ströstner from Paraguay, who kept Paraguay safe for decades from communist menace, do you know who jumps at my throat the most? It's our friend the neocons. Look it up. Look who jumped at your neck on the right, so-called, if you post in support of these Latinx-American dictators. It's not for show either what they do. It's an emotional, often it's a family issue for them. And I've seen this a long time ago, even with Pinochet, who I've always loved, but who drives the crystal from Crenshaw, McCain types, completely nuts. Nobody is less suited to deal with a reality of coming years than those who have hijacked the intellectual side of conservatism since the 1980s.

But I'm afraid it's not the Buchananites or the Bannon version of so-called paleo-composition, And now it's called nationalist populism or they come up with different names for it. But I think this is also unsuited and nobody is ready for what is coming. Nobody but me and Wellebeck. And I've tried to tell you all ideas have failed. Soon America enters age of blood and which dick get in what pussy? I take this from Wellebeck, great French Belgian writer. Is that too unpleasant for you? I'm sorry. You can write a complaint to The Hague. I will be right back. Now let me close this beginning segment in two sections telling you this, what I've said now about the Latin American so-called hard right. It was the Argentinian intelligence service, by the way, that ran American policy in Central

America also, the C-Day. But everything I tell you about this, about how it's the neo-cons who are emotionally opposed to this, and I tell you this for real, I have basically vendettas against me from these dwarf-like, certain creature, like neocon-type creature because I brought up Rhodesia, or because I said I like Pinochet and this kind. If you tell this to a leftist, they will be totally incredulous, they won't believe you're saying it. Why? Because many of them come from environment of Chomskyite conspiracy paranoia, where they actually believe people like Crystal, Bill Crystal, are secret supporters of neo-Nazis or of white supremacy in Latin America. And right, Kristal and Cheney and Rick Wilson meet in secret to promote white colonialism and this.

And it's because they have a demented view of the right, something that looks totally fantastical to those of us on the right who are in the middle of it and see how divided and weak it is. But the delusionals on the other side believe it's a united, homogenous, centralized conspiracy or they pretend to believe that there's a united right, centralized conspiracy involving the CIA, billionaires, massive funding, massive coordination of messaging and all this. And they were saying this in the 2000s and Chomsky before, and by extension the left believes this about white people also, it's the same thing, same delusion, right? This is the thing behind that obsession with whiteness and white privilege, it's a massive

conspiracy that the lowliest person from let's say the wilds of West Ukraine or some guy from Appalachia whose father lost a cold job or this, that they have secret handshake with Lloyd Blankfein, they're in on it with a white conspiracy, that Socrates and Hume are part of a trans-historical white people conspiracy to keep down POC, people of color. Or I guess the term now is BIPOC, B-I-P-O-C, which I always thought this meant bisexual people of color, but apparently it does not. There are so many similar so-called intellectuals on that side, the Delusionoid Agamben, he's an Italian thinker, Agamben. He believes that the secret nomos, okay it's a fancy way he's trying to ape Carl Schmitt the way everyone tries to ape Carl Schmitt now, but basically he thinks Auschwitz was

built into the West since Socrates or whatever, that is the secret meaning of the West is Auschwitz. So it's written in a slightly more intelligent pretense than Chomsky, but it's part of the same conspiratoid view of politics, and I guess I want to end this long beginning segment by telling you not to be like that. I mean, don't be like the Wignats, the so-called white nationalists who believe in Zion Dawn, right? They believe, they repeat this, you know, in varieties the belief that Trump is part of some decades-long psy-op to hijack American dissatisfaction with neoliberalism, and to turn it into a Zionist or a fruitless direction. Just like the left believes that Trump is a psy-op to diffuse the Bernie movement, right? So it's easy to see how crazy this is when you consider Bernie.

Bernie Sanders gave up without a fight in 2016, who has no charisma, who would never able to win a national election because he's a Larry David character, okay, who unlike Trump who is playing Rodney Dangerfield, Bernie is completely unaware of himself. He has no self-consciousness, so this is what I mean. These kinds of beliefs, because it's silly because no faction in American society is capable of decades or even years long 44-dimension chess planning like this, okay? The most you get are provincial bureaucrats who read that morning's emails from the DNC or even just the newspapers, and they repeat some talking points. When you get a psyop candidate, it's always something transparent and ham-handed, like McMullen, we will win Utah from – you know, McMullen or Yang.

It's never a decades-long thing. There is not a will or intelligence capable of thinking beyond a year's horizon, generally, in the United States right now or Europe. It's all short-term and the left itself is not united either. Maybe it's a little bit more united than the right, it's more astroturfed, right? Which is why they always think the right is equally astroturfed. So they couldn't conceive the 4chan thing was real, it must have been Russia or now you have morons saying it was the CIA or billionaires, they did it to, you know, they funded 4chan to deprive obese nerds of the leadership of a socialist, non-racist movement that would have otherwise organically developed or this. But they also thought the Tea Party was astroturfed by billionaires, right?

Because often on the left there's a lot more coordination, there's funding organization that you know about with Soros and this. But the point is the left also is incapable of real long-term planning. It's not united by a single intelligence. And the United States government isn't either. The globalists are Zog or NWO, call it what you will. It's not. Conspiracies no doubt take place everywhere, right? But these are people fumbling around for short-term gain. Many of them are not high IQ. Most of them are venal. Almost all are desperate for status and money, even at the highest levels, by the way. I mean, you look at Bezos, right? He's the richest man in the world, supposedly. And he gets taken by his wife for four, three pussies, loses I think tens of billions.

And then all he wants to do is to join the society of Hollywood and film actors in his private life. So the man exhibits in some way his own perceived inferiority to the actor. He wants to join Hollywood actor society in a sense as a supplicant. So in other words, all the effort and success and what does he do with it? He could be, you'd think with those kinds of resources, he could be Roman Emperor style, but no, he wants to join what he thinks is cool kid society of Hollywood actors. I guess that is Roman Emperor, Gabalus would be, you know, but it's pathetic, right? So the new tech elite is absolutely pathetic. You look at Zuckerface, you look at Gates, you know, I know what Alex Jones says about their supposed grand designs and this, but I just see very dour men who dress and look

very bad and whose ambitions are, you know, education initiatives, petty election manipulation, or distributing mosquito nets in Africa. And all this social consciousness they inherited from somebody else, right, where does it come from? You look at a restaurant scene in American Psycho, it's a very good spoof of this. But where is the greatness, and I'm not even going to give it to Elon Musk, you know, until Until one of them tries to take over a small country and seeks the glory of a condottiere, they are all pikers to me. Idi Amin, leader of Uganda, had far more wealth and power than any of them. This is truth. Give me the choice of the power and position of either and I choose Idi Amin any day. This is just the emergent tech elite and so on, but the political elite are far worse.

Kamala, can you imagine what her private life is like, what her dreams are like? You watch this documentary about Viner and Huma Abedin, right? I mean, it's this and Paul Singer types who manipulate a Republican Party to allow gay this and that, gay marriage because his daughter is a lesbian or something. So these are petty usurers and office back dealers. They do conspiracies for sure, but they are not capable of centralized grand designs that take years, something like putting Trump to hijack another movement over 10 years. They are fumbling about and mostly they make very clumsy mistakes, many of them, which they get away with often because the media and the people, the many, are even stupider and they have no fight in them. So they get away with very transparent stuff.

But the point is when you make them out to be some unified coordinated power that manages to meticulously plan out messaging, movies, foreign and domestic policy, unintentionally you're doing PR for them. You strengthen them by making them seem unassailable and all-powerful. This is what leftist conspiracy chumsketards do for the crystal types. They were doing it all through the 2000s. Excuse me, they attacked me, you see, with radio waves, but they do this pretending that Carl Schmitt, Hitler's lawyer, their words, not mine, but was behind the Bush movement. It was a secret attempt to reintroduce neo-Nazis from 70 years ago. They were doing this, and I know some of these people, they're pathetic people who as I tell

you would be distributing pickles in a deli otherwise, but you see you're unintentionally they do PR and they strengthen position, what in the case of crystal is its spokes mouth, but in general for others right you're doing a force multiplier effect for them. You enhance their prestige and power when you do the whole conspiracy thing only, you know. bit is fine. Loki-Julianos does it well, but most do not. So the point is, do not do that for the globalist factions either. Don't do PR for them with the conspiracy monger. In reality, there are so many factions and so much stupidity that you could drive many wedges and you could frighten some into doing your bidding. I mean, 2016 spooked them, right? This is where the Russia claims come from. They got so frightened.

But instead of taking advantage of this, some of you make them into these hyper potent gods who pull all the strings, control reality, which then it also has the other effect of demoralizing much of your side. Now I was talking to the bureaucrat the other day about this, and he's right. He mentioned to me showing covert motivations and hidden connections and all this. It's fine if you can do it well. But this assumes you can also deal with their arguments and claims at face value. And our great power is in poking at those obvious hypocrisies, at the content, not at the connections. It's in exposing the pretensions or ignorance. For instance, let me ask you purely from a public relations point of view, which is more valuable?

Is it more valuable to expose the ignorance and absurdity of the globalist ideas, or on the other hand, to convince the public that the globalists are part of a centuries-long, All-powerful conspiracies that control messaging on both the left and the right. I mean, in what way is this ultimately different from an impersonal, let's say it's called milieu theory, the belief that all reality is controlled by impersonal economic or historical forces, which Nietzsche calls a neurotics theory, right, because it leaves you powerless. Both amount to the same thing, which is to play on the reader's desire not to be manipulated, and both offer the initiate's hope of drawing the veil from their eyes, but ultimately both

reader impotent in the face of an unchangeable reality, whether it's systematic historical forces or conspiracy, it amounts to the same thing. And in fact, it even makes a fetish out of this impotence. Why do anything when you can revel instead in showing how you're persecuted by hidden hands? I meet many entertaining schizophrenics who revel in showing how they are persecuted by hidden powers. Whereas I think it's better to cut off at the knees the arguments of the enemy and whether you do it with reason or with humor or with images, you can do it in various ways, or with presenting alternative vision that leaves theirs looking milquetoast or weak or stupid. Is this much better? And I try to do some of the latter and so far, you know, they are unable to counter me.

They can huff and puff and they can make up things about me or they can call me names and fascists, but they can't counter the images and the things they say for the same reason – this is longer talk, but they cannot do it for the same reason that if it had not been suppressed by military force, nothing really could counter the example and message, for example, of Mussolini in the modern world. If there is a counter to that, the future may show it, but it isn't known right now in our time. It can only be repressed. So we live in a kind of a weird time historically as if the French Revolution and Napoleon were repressed and people were still play acting and being traditional monarchs. This, what our time is like after, let's say 1920s or so, anyway I say it's better to cut

off the arguments of the enemy with reason or humor. Or the other ways I just said now and this connect to again what our strength is as frogs because what is frog movement or frog sphere if you will because it's not, it's not really a movement, but what is the strength, what is it that made us different from other things that came before? Okay, so some of you may not like what I will say now, but it's the truth. It's not the superior theory or political theory or this that made us different or, you know, a lot of people are called theory cells now, they read Baudrillard or this, but it's not the theory that made us different. It's not also, it's not the conspiracy mongering. It's not the mystical stuff either.

It's not the religious stuff, the Heidegger things and all these, the trad religious posters. Some of these are very good, some of them are my friends, but it's not what made the frog thing different. What made the frog thing, the whole 4chan frog sphere different is science, okay? It's scientific studies, it's the truth of nature, it's the truth of race, which was edited out by the establishment and it put the establishment in such a straitjacket of absurdity and repression that is misnamed political correctness. But what made us different is HBD, right? It's the explosive idea that explodes our opposition, the establishment. It's the natural differences between the sexes, between races, between peoples. It is the scientific angle that I say, no, it's combined with the humor, of course,

the irreverence, which is why our memes have such immediate punch and power because we We can quickly in one image expose the absurdities into which the enemy has twisted himself. And this is our messaging strength. Even more than the Tucker Carlson and other Bannonite or populist nationalism talking points about immigration and this, or globalism and this, it is this specific scientific and human approach that made us different. The environment stuff, the diet stuff, nutrition, the concern with xenoestrogens, with the chemical castration and the poisoning of youth of mass population, you know, all of this, the mockery of their immigration, holiness and other pretensions, it ultimately all comes from that, from the scientific bent, from the concern with HBD and so forth.

And so I guess this show, why I make this? Because I want to remind audience, I think maybe 90% plus of you are frogs from Europe and United States and Australia and so forth, I want to ask all of you to stay true to that because it is the winning path. And I say this as a Nietzsche, in other words, I myself am not so, to speak, an orthodox member of all this frog or 4chan world that I described. I'm closer to European philosophy or literary concern and all this, but even so I recognize that what made this wonderful moment that started maybe sometime in the 2000s and picked up in the 2010s, what made it different was the scientific and humor approach. And not all of us have to do it, but I believe that it should remain central, you know.

It's really what was so revolutionary and disruptive about the frog attack on the worthless pieties of the age. It's what made, for example, Hartiste great also. It made him a teacher to many of you. And this approach must be given pride of first place among the frogs, and I guarantee you that if we return to this messaging wholehearted, many of us are still doing it. But if we put this center again, which we never really left, right, but if we put it center if we stick to this and emphasize this element is path to victory and it's the most disruptive thing we can do because it cuts off the arguments, the religion, the pretensions of the enemy at the knees, it cuts off his religion, saps it of whatever little power it has. It's substantively and where it matters.

It is the rebirth of real science, the reawakening of nature that is a possibility here which overwhelms all opponents and ideas and poses, which I myself, I've tried to pursue it in a variation from slightly different direction. But this, the spirit of Hardist, of 4chan, of HBD, this so-called autismo, this kind of autismo. Look, if you do something different, if you're into weird energies and mystical things and religious history, that's fine. Like me or Lady Astor, we're into that. That's fine. I'm not saying stop doing it. Each of us is good at a different thing. But we all must remember what made Frog Uprising different. And it is that distinction that must be given center of battlefield. I believe this. I will be right back.

To tell you a small problem with poisoning, I tell you before many times I've been poisoned. I don't like to dwell on it, but Nietzsche is right that it teaches you much. If you have frequent bouts of poison because you see how you start to think different at different times and how a variation in biological state affects thought at a very deep level when it concerns the evaluation of life on one hand. It's very hard to understand what that means, evaluation of life or of reality on the other. So it teaches you, in other words, supreme truth that is biology and that truth itself is in large part dependent on biological conditions, which is very deep philosophical disputation that is not suited for radio show.

But basically, after Nietzsche you only have various attempts to run away from or to cover up his discovery, which is why all so-called philosophy after Nietzsche is worthless, and why all artists and true writers after him were only disciples of him and not of anyone who pretended to write philosophy after him. Because that one truth of supremacy of biology is at face value absurd and contradictory, But when you think it through, it's so powerful that it breaks through language, and if anyone will get behind it, it will only come in the remote future, after we have learned much more about biology or what you could call human biodiversity than we know now about human types. But anyway, so I told you eating Chinese sewer creature quite a few years ago, and I remember

many of you liked that kind of story. find it cute that I am attacked by various forces who try to poison me with food, ethnics, they give the ethnics food, and recently I had very bad effects and I guess many causes. Okay, I could be from tropical sushi, it could be this, or could it be I went to a German so-called place here, you know the Germans like to emigrate to tropical things places so I go to this sausage place. You must always be very careful with ground meat, you know, especially in warm weather. In fact, you should always cook at home if you can, but eating ground meat when you go out is a Russian roulette, right? So it could be any of these things. But I want to give you cautionary tale here about health foods and supplements if this

is okay, you know, because the cause of my most recent so-called poisoning I think is a little different from just merely eating tainted food. So I'm walking around the streets, and I start to feel dizzy sometimes, and I find I cannot sleep. I wake up every two hours, and those two hours each feel like 12, with conflicted dreams and so on. So it's ordeal. When I wake up, I don't feel rested. And so then here in certain places, they check your temperature to get into the mall, right? So I notice something very strange. When I feel like this lately sometimes, I go into a certain place, my temperature is really low. I thought I would have a fever, is this Wuhan flu? But no, my temperature was very low, too low, and it's not accurate measure anyway because

you know those machines, they usually give you something lower than what it is. So I asked Dr. Fred, it's lower than usual is the point, so many frog are doctored, that's not accident as I keep telling you. So I ask him and he say, you know, it sounds like perhaps iron deficiency, right? By the way, most doctors are crap, okay? Most doctors are people who go into it for status, and mommy said I'm a smart boy and this, and they have no diagnostic ability or anything, but many good frogs are good doctors, because when you are a doctor, you are face-to-face with human misery and human biology in inescapable ways, and so it turns many people to our side. But so, hold on a moment, he say iron deficiency, how, what, what this means? So it's called anemia, right? Mild anemia, right?

So real anemia, you can die and anemia can lead to lowered IQ. So I apologize if latest shows have not been as good as before, who knows? But mild anemia is what this doctor said it sounds like. And it made me think, you know, how is it possible? Because we've all been taught that iron is the devil, right? I mean, we all read Mangan, you know, the blogger Mangan, he had a kind of right wing blog and then he turned health blogger, it's a common switch. I like him by the way, he popularized many good ideas, but he has a whole book about how iron is bad for you and in many ways he's right. You should read his iron book. And I would have never thought that I in particular would be at risk for iron deficiency, okay?

I took 23andMe and this, I'm a carrier for hemochromatosis and that's an interesting story, right? It's actually a genetic advantage. Why are there so many carriers for this? Because it obviously confers an advantage in the same way that being a carrier for cystic fibrosis does, otherwise process of natural selection would have wiped out these kinds of recessive diseases very fast. But obviously being a carrier, having just one of the recessive alleles, confers some kind of advantage in the same way that, you know, sickle cell anemia exists, right? Because if you carry one variety of that gene, you have some immunity to malaria. And that's enough of an advantage that, you know, even though when you get both copies of the recessive allele, in other words, you get this terrible disease.

That in a normal case, those alleles would be completely wiped out through natural selection. But when you get just one version, it gives you such an advantage, some immunity to malaria, right? So for cystic fibrosis, it must be a similar thing, but it's unknown exactly what the advantage is for being a carrier of cystic fibrosis. It's very common in North Europe, I think. But for hemochromatosis, it seems straightforward, which is that in Central America, Central Asia, in certain ancestral environments in Central Asia where you've got arrows lodged into your skull, right, in certain ancestral environments it's advantageous to be able to retain iron, maybe where you are likely to bleed a lot, I don't know, people make up theories.

But right, so hemochromatosis in other words is a disease where you just get too much iron if you have that disease, right, but if you're just a carrier for it, it means you have disadvantage of iron retention but not too much, and it's an advantage in an ancestral environment. So I thought, all right, I can never have iron deficiency. And I would have never thought I was at risk for iron deficiency yet when I took blood work a few years ago. The doctor says you have low iron, you have low ferritin, you should take iron supplements. So I thought this is very strange. Why is this? Well, at the time I refused. I said, OK, I will eat more liver and so on. But in fact, it seems to have caught up with me by now.

And this is why I think it's the supplements I take, some of which are recommended by Mangan. He recommends, for example, curcumin, right? Look up what curcumin does to iron. He say berberine. It's another supplement he recommend. Look up what berberine does to iron. In fact, Mangan even attributes berberine antimicrobial effects to its iron leaching properties, which I think is wrong, by the way, but it's part of the story. But berberine leaches iron. And then what else? I take many other such interesting supplements. I take oregano oil, sometimes it has many good effects and I often take it lately to avoid colds and such. Does it have prophylactic effect against Wuhan flu, who knows, but it nukes your gut, oregano

oil is very strong, antibiotic effect, it has many good effects, but it blocks and leeches iron. So I consider these advantages because like you I read Mangan and others, iron is bad, you need to get rid of iron, then you consider coffee. I drink huge amounts of coffee with every meal, okay, so there are studies that show 60-70% of iron from any meal will be blocked if you have coffee or tea with it. And in some cases it's the caffeine, in other cases it's the tannins. And certain fruit I eat, I love berries, well blackberries and this it makes you leech iron. And some people don't understand in general about plants by the way. or pig whatever, kale, has protein, but it also has many other things that block the uptake of protein for a human.

So when you see nutritional content in many plants, it doesn't mean you can absorb that. And similar in this is how cocoa has iron, but also other things that block and leach iron. So then to all this, you add that I largely avoid beef. Now look, if you eat beef every day, maybe you would not have such problem of iron deficiency. But I largely avoid beef lately and not out of any other reasons and I cannot take the taste of beef so often. It's also very heavy, it makes me feel sad after I eat it at night especially, not maybe for moral reason, not any moral reason I'm conscious of, but it leaves me with a heavy feeling physically. So I avoid sometimes beef or red meat for periods of time, and I rely mostly on seafoods for protons. Fish seafoods are my favorite.

And where I am now, there is not so much clams, which clams contain iron and certain other minerals, but there is a lot of fish. Maybe it's even mercury poisoning, who knows. So you know, I'm on an iron-blocking, iron-leaching diet, in other words. I get very little from my diet and I take all these supplements that leach it. So you don't want to understand that you need iron, okay? You need these things that we say are bad, but you need them in your diet, some of them. You need iron to live. You need estrogen. Without estrogen, you die, okay? So I have a whole thing in my book about estrogen and Ray Peet's theories about that, but you still need estrogen. It's simply that in the modern world, which is this festering vagina, everything is estrogenic, so you get too much.

But it's possible to go on the other side. So mangan is on aromatase inhibitors and that's a way to permanently fuck yourself up. You cannot be on permanent estrogen blockers forever, okay? I'm telling you this small anecdote to tell you to be careful. It's an anecdote about myself. Not all bro science advice you get is always appropriate for you. I believe actually bro science is superior to mainstream nutritional science and so forth. It's a big part of the frog sphere, of our attraction to new recruits and to the normies and so forth. But you must listen to power of your own physiology. If you start to feel unusual when you follow somebody else's advice or these things, you must listen to your physiology and instincts and try to change course.

And the iron thing, again, might be special because I assume most of you eat more beef than I do and you don't take all the weird supplements I mentioned, but it's something to look into if you have occasional lack of energy and brain fog and some of the other things I mentioned. It's very easy to test for anyway. So the other thing I would mention here, very controversial, okay, I know if I say this I will upset some of you. People get very emotional on this subject. But I will blame it on Menaquin on four because he gave me this research, okay. But animals in the wild do not have high cholesterol levels, okay. They just don't. And that goes for both prey and predator. In animals that are domesticated, or in the zoo, they have higher cholesterol levels. Am I allowed to say this?

I know it's heresy for our side, but the thing is eggs are great. In fact, I eat every day almost, I eat one meal fish, one meal egg. But when you slunk 30 eggs a day, I'm saying take it easy, you might fuck up your liver. And it's not necessary to build a powerful body or physique or anything, it's not necessary to slunk that many eggs to build powerful body. You can do it in other ways. Hunter-gatherer humans, they are not high cholesterol. Sorry, the human in the wild is not high cholesterol. And I'm sorry this goes against some things on our side, but be open to this argument. And again, I blame manaquinone for if it offends you. But above all what I'm saying is you must listen to your own physiology and some of you may do better on high fat diet, but others may profit from lower fat.

Not everyone born with St. Pancreas and so on. So I warned you before about carnivore diet or other extreme things like that and a good compromise in general I recommend before if you look at archivore diet, A-R-C-H-E, archivore diet, I've posted on it. It's a good condensation of different wisdom from our side of things but without anything too extreme. It's generally a moderate diet. Some say the guy who designed it realized it was perhaps too low carb, but he doesn't say you shouldn't eat carbs. He says you can eat certain fruit, you can eat tubers, but he, I think, chose to up even so the carb content. He started to have problems, but they were solved when he moved to higher carb content and such. But in any case, I see this to you because there are a variety of ways to achieve your

goals. If you want strength or speed or like I said before, it's possible to build very powerful aesthetic physique even on occasional Big Mac. I'm not saying you should eat that. I never do. But Thomas 7-7 said this before. I'm saying if that's your goal, you must know it's possible. It's not necessarily all of our autismal diet and supplement recommendations. You don't need to follow them, especially if you're getting bad effects from them in real time. But Thomas 7 said this to me before. The biggest bodybuilder are either Polish or Afrikanoids who eat Big Macs, okay? I mean, okay, they take steroids too, but I'm saying you don't need to follow every single one of autismal diet and supplement recommendations and think that if you don't

have that you will not be able to have Z's physique and so on. You must study bad effects you are getting in real time and must adjust. So if you're having trouble with iron-reaching diet or slunking 30 eggs a day, perhaps re-evaluate. You must study. You must study things for yourself very carefully. For example, how does Menaquinone 4 know these things? It's true he spends many hours spent in study of physiology, of the medical literature, but also the scientific literature, because as Ray Peat says, a lot of the medical literature is not reliable. A lot of the medical literature is sponsored by big pharma and so forth, and so the scientific literature on the nutrition and such things, sometimes quite different.

And Mangan does not know this difference, and he studies only the titles of studies, or he looks at the abstracts of the studies you find on PubMed and such, but you need to read the entire study, and you need to keep in mind that many studies are crap. Better analyses are better but most individual studies are crap and you need to also look into general animal physiology and you look into competing factions of autists who find for example animal study like the one on cholesterol I just mentioned. It teaches you much. I think there was debate between for example Stefan Guillenet and opponents who advocated for carnivore diet and they didn't do too well against Guillenet who advocates a kind of low-fat, high-carb diet.

Look, if I don't mix things up, but there are hunter-gatherers whose diets at times of year are majority tubers or carbs, 70% or 80%, or at times of year even just honey, and they're very lean and so on. I'm not recommending that. But I realize too much information may confuse, and it's important to have simplicity in approach and contradictory information, very destructive to action. But in diets, in supplements you take, and so on, simplicity necessary. But this just appeals to, you know, respect the principle of biodiversity in yourself too. So that if others' recommendations aren't working to make you feel strong and powerful, they're not giving you results, let's say, after two, three months, assuming you keep

to them in a disciplined way, but then you must see where there is problem and how to change it. And the truth of biology, you know, is things like this. How do people come to our side? So many came through artiste. I mean, the nutrition is another important element of it. But so many people came to our site through artiste. Why? Because they lie to you about the truth of biology and mating, of courtship and of women. This is a big lie of society. And when you find out how they lie to you about that, that's the first so-called red pill, right? So many frogs enter into realizing how many other things they've been bullshitted about is through artiste. But they lie also about nutrition. You have to find out what works for you. They lie about disease.

They lie about currency, the way currency economic work. And then in the end you see they lie about politics. And the thing is these are not grand conspiracy. It's rather a series of modern stupidities and of lies that are transparent and recent. In other words, nobody before 1940 thought it was a good idea to eat paint thinner, right? Well that's seed oil. It's paint thinner. It's bufa. It's polyunsaturated fatty acids. like canola oil that's the cause of so many diseases. It's an industrial byproduct sold to you as health food. So it's a mixture of venality and stupidity that's behind this kind of modern mass democratic society that is really an unprecedented experiment in human history and that's going to end very

badly and there are experiments with new forms of nutrition, for example, from fake foods like that or with gender equality or other such things, all comes from these two things – finality, short-term thinking, stupidity – and it creates then this web of modern lies that industries of experts have an interest in preserving, right? But there are many such cases, it's all like that, lies about currency, other things. These were all things that were universally known until recently. You can't spend more than you have. You can't eat paint thinner. Women and men are not the same. People both insane and dumb have taken helm of the greatest and most powerful societies in history that they had no hand in building.

And this is what is unusual about our time, about the mannequins and very small people that almost by chance, as a side effect of problem of mass democracy, have taken helm of the knowledge of the modern world. But they spread only lies and the only way out of it is the reappearance of natural truths that were so widely known, universal among mankind until very recently. So you ask any old cab driver or restaurant manager in third world and they will have similar woman advice to the things that these things are saying is not such a secret. It's only the idiocy of modern world that has made that forbidden esoteric knowledge. It's not that it's simple things, but the natural wisdom of mankind, which is imperfectly

preserved in various traditions, in some better than others, but it's being wiped out because some very dumb people took control of big society. So they pushed too far, they pushed dumb stories about women, they pushed democracy, or other forms of denaturing and weakness that then they resell to you as liberation and novelty. And I think this is path for us to victory when we return to realities of nature. That is how we discredit them through the power of science, of HBD, human biodiversity, so-called, of satire. But in the end, you know, this is not scientism. For me, it's not scientism that I'm trying to promote, because the final purpose, as I have said it for myself, is the recovery of glory and of the magnificence of nature. How did Greeks defeat Asia? Right?

Through nudity, you know? Is this a bit of exaggeration? But this is one of the chief differences that Greeks themselves recognized between themselves and Orientals, nudity. That Greeks were not ashamed to disrobe and work out naked, whereas Asians were. Why was this so important to the Greeks? There is much profound in this attitude and it marks the difference ultimately between a people that undertakes confrontation with the vital force of life and nature and glorifies it and all the others, the vast majority of mankind that obscure or lie about it in some way or other, and all the other effects from the wars of the Greeks against the barbarians. In other words, their superiority in war tactics, which if you read, for example, again Xenophon

on a basis and you will see how quickly they adapt to new circumstances. These are from long periods of experience and training in warfare, ability to learn. The Asians did not have that because they are beholden to their idiotic conventions and traditions. have no confrontation with the reality of nature. But all the other Greek advantages in war tactics, in various kinds of military technology, in superior firepower and weaponry, all this came ultimately from this same orientation towards nature and vitality. And we aren't ancient Greeks, or at least not yet, but by the way, if some can resurrect Israel as a nation for after 2,000 years, why we not resurrect our own Spartas and also the old languages, ancient Hellenic language on the edges of the world.

But yes, we aren't ancient Greeks yet, but nevertheless, our strength and power also comes from this same encounter with nature and the true science, which can break their fake petty tradition of scientism, that's not real science, but which can in our case show the true hierarchy of values because it can show the hierarchy of human types. And with this hopeful reminder and encouragement to proceed down a path that has already brought us victory before and it's shown us the path to it I say to you until next time BAP out