Yes, welcome Caribbean Rhythms, episode 69. And no, it is not pornography show. In fact, I was in escapist mood last few days thinking about Lost Kingdom of Shambhala, or even watch a movie about Shangri-La. But yes, it is not pornography show, but maybe you not let children listen today. Maybe this not. And speaking of pornography, I remind you, many people were uncomfortable when I posted a poll to ask if I should start a high production value porn company. And now I agree with you that modern version of mass pornography is a form of psychological warfare. But then it's unclear why some of us should not fight on this territory and why we should consider it only to enemies, why we should always act in ways they expect us to. It's very strange.

What else am I here to do but to find a new ways to win and to wield a spiritual rapier? The rapier, the sword, is a great weapon. Maybe it has two dozen unique ways to lunge and to attack from eccentric, from unusual directions. It's a kind of medieval renaissance super weapon and I think this is more effective than a katana. But people like the exotic swords, I suppose, they always like the foreign things, even though I would imagine to an American a rapier would be as foreign as a katana, but I would like to bear a kris at my side, this kris, a beautiful Indonesian sword, and to wear a sarong. Maybe I should start. What will stop me if I decide to wear sarong in public? And you see this in the Conrad stories of the seas of Indonesia.

He has the phrase Chris bearing warriors, very proud people, well people like exotic weapons I guess but to Japan the rapier is exotic and this is good date advice by the way. I'm telling you there are online debates about this which is superior, the rapier or the katana, they go in great details. I suggest you memorize this, you go webpage, memorize the debate and then you discourse at length with girl at dinner and she will love you, okay, but what I mean people forget this that my goals are to win and I assume maybe the point of my commentary or that of anyone else among the frogs and so is to present for you, is it to present for you a story of personal redemption or of personal rectitude? Is that the point? Because I don't get this. What is meaning of that? to the advantage.

And this, for example, is what I believe is a Roush mistake, I tell you before, because what he was doing before his so-called conversion, okay, is if he wanted to steer and wield that, what he was doing before, into a weapon on our side, and his knowledge of the nature of women and of the sexual fight in various places in the world, he would have been far more suited to that, to turn that to use for us in various other ways. He much more suited to that than to pretend to be an orthodox monk and this and to hang a giant wooden cross on his neck and to bow to a babushka and to do what exactly? I don't say, okay, it's good for him, maybe, but what do I care that he does that? Not to speak of the fact that he gave fodder to the Judeo-York Times and the Beto's Beta

Post, I think is named, gave them fodder to typecast us as a kind of proto-ISIS. They promptly did it as soon as he made his conversion public and this. But would not the more holy thing, if you're a, let's say, religious, you're a great sinner and you become religious, let's say like Rushworth, but would not the holier thing be to decide send deeper into sin, if you can wield it to destroy the enemy, rather than to put your own personal salvation over the salvation of countless millions. I don't know if holy is the right word, I don't know this theology, but look, this is not general advice of course, but only for the very few, but in my opinion, Roush had a talent at what he was doing before, whereas what he's doing now is just a moral story you can find anywhere in it.

On the other hand, if I ever do make my anti-zag porn company, I will do so under a different pseudonym. Do not worry. And I say, by the way, modern pornography, because since we are on the subject, it's worth to consider. You may have heard, for example, from so-called six positive feminists, like Camille Paglia. She's the best of them, but there are a few others that are dumber. otherwise a good writer, but she says she's pro-porn and that she's against both the feminist and the social conservative condemnation of pornography. And she's actually relatively correct in that those who, for example, critique pornography from the feminist or genderqueer academia racket point of view, they are completely unqualified to do so because they don't know anything about history of art, about history

of religion or the cultic significance of certain... For example, she's very good at taking apart the paranoid Foucauldian academic attacks. These are the American followers of Foucault. They read him, they read French theory, and they read nothing else. They know nothing of history. But they have this attack, I may have told you before, on the so-called Herms. These were ancient Greek border markers. They include a giant phallus and this is a statuette of bearded man's head and on the pillar is a giant erect phallus. And modern academic has a sexualized and power-based interpretation of these very ancient god-like figurines. They actually do not even know they are used as border markers. But they have this without understanding their religious significance is that, you know,

They were not a celebration of, say, patriarchal potency or whatever in the political sense, but it's something very different. So you know how these primal, uncanny festivals to the phallus, there is one in Japan to a giant wooden phallus, they bring it out and there are wild rejoicings all around it, but I'm almost convinced these are actually part of ancient earth mother cults, very much like the Herms absolutely were part of mother cult and not part of later patriarchal Apollonian rights. They are not an expression of patriarchal Apollonian frame that actually shifts consciousness away entirely from fertility celebrations and from the use of the power of fertility as a totem. And you see ultimate expression of Apollonian power in the statues of Apollo, for example,

where he orders the lapiths and centaurs to stop fighting. This is in relief stolen by the British from the Parthenon, I think, the statues stolen from there, or in the Apollonian statues to athletes that were sculpted by Polykleitos at the height of classical Greek celebrations of manliness. You look at the Doryphoros and the Adumanos. These are the products of an entirely manly society. These are the celebrations, you could say the spiritual celebrations of political patriarchy. by the most patriarchal society ever, which ascended to heights of spirit because it managed to exclude everything woman from politics and philosophy and art. And there you do not see giant pharaohs on these statues, but very much the opposite,

as a deliberate emphasis away from reproductive or fertility function, and instead as a complete focus of all vital biological force, rather to action, to spirit, to the body and also to the head, the eyes, the face, the eyes are very pronounced, or in the famous Apollo Belvedere, which is of, you could say, later, maybe slightly more feminized age. But like Schopenhauer says, the head of this Apollo Belvedere seems almost entirely otherworldly. The body is shown in its glory. It's not, of course, it's not mortification and this separation of mind and body or anything of the sort. But somehow Schopenhauer says the independence of the head from the body in the neck of the statue, you can see it online, it embodies, he says, the freedom of the intellect from the needs of the will.

Which is a long way of me saying, well, a patriarchal mindset does not emphasize me-dick, right? But entirely different things that are alien to the minds of women and of modern faggots, like Foucault, who misinterpret then everything, make a mess of everything, and like Foucault who knew nothing about different phases of Greek history, the modern academic forgets the herms didn't come out of this society I just mentioned, but the much more ancient and one that continued in parallel underground sense that is much more, you could say, in the sphere of the woman, of the folk and the people as such. The woman and the folk is always allied. So anyway, I go on tangents because I like to make tangents, but this way of saying these

people are unqualified to understand either modern or ancient porn, but Philistine academics cannot criticise modern porn because they have no idea, for example, context in which ancient porn they like to compare the two, but they don't understand how ancient porn was produced or appreciated, they see a pottery and assume it was everywhere, they make clumsy They imagine, for example, that ancient porn was widespread, that it was accessible as part of some sexually liberated society, and not understanding that very much like modern porn, actually, it was considered at times subversive, underworld, and at other times was considered funny. So depictions on Greek pottery and whatnot are quite rare in context of what other artists found at the time.

often it's presented in a funny or ridiculous way. So Plato was not entirely being an Egyptian Hebrew prude when he says that man looks most clownish when he's in the middle of sexor's act. That seems to have been a relatively frequent opinion of the time. Or maybe you'd use that pottery, you know, of Greek orgies and this, you'd have that for display when you invite your favorite courtesans to party or this. But it was not displayed on every corner, and Greeks made fun of other peoples who supposedly copulated in public. For example, Herodotus has a line I like to quote frequently about the ancient Indians they copulated in public, like cattle, similar to Ethiopians whose skinhues they shared. And I believe Xenophon say the same in the Anabasis about this tribe by the Black Sea,

the Masinoikians. And this is very funny. So I mean to say Paglia, for example, as an example of a pro-sex so-called or pro-porn feminist, she knows that the role of ancient pornography was very limited and circumscribed by all kinds of social and religious taboos, even if it was not outlawed. So I mean, if she's so good on that, I don't know why it may be hard for her to make the comparison to modern porn, which is unfortunately so widely available. And this is the big difference, it's not like there is a recent change. Maybe she does not know this, maybe she doesn't write about this, but now as you know it is pumped into every home, where very young people, teenagers or even younger, they are bombarded

with just unlimited access to pornography because of the internets, which did not exist before. And so you all know, I don't want to repeat all the arguments about the bad effects of this. It can rewire the brain. It leads to all kinds of dysfunction and paraphilia in this. And none of this, the easily accessible and ubiquitous character of this is what distinguishes it from earlier versions of pornography. So in this sense, it should of course really be banned simply because of the suspicion of such effects on the very young, even if it's not proven. I should say it's not a 100% thing. I know many well-turned-out men who say they use porn and who still have a virile and vigorous character in life, and they say it did nothing to retard their development, and some say

even that they learned from it how to treat some women and such. I cannot comment on that. Obviously you should use common sense for your case if you are having, you know, a dry spell to not use porn maybe. I don't know. I think it's very possible that it won't affect everyone the same, that some people escape its bad effects, but maybe it affects other good people in a bad way and simply out of caution maybe should be banned, maybe in the sense of just not being so easily accessible to the young. And none of you are likely to disagree with this, but then you ask me why I talk of producing it. And it's because I will fight on any terrain that presents itself. I will fight in any way that I have to for us to win. And I don't care about my purity in this.

I will engage in psychological and social warfare if it's useful for us in any way. And you don't have to approve of this. You can condemn me. And probably if I do this you won't know about it again. But I will make movies maybe, well I won't tell you the name, but I have close friends who advise me do not do this. These are people I respect very much. Some are religious, some – but we have arguments. I say to them, the Dark Ocean Society, the Genyoshi, that I admire so much from Japanese history. They were in late 19th century, they were ex-samurai. They decide to form a populist party, 1880s Japan, 1890s. They decide to do this to fight the wave of degeneracy and modernization. They decide to steer it in a direction that was for the benefit of the emperor. The cover was to be populist.

This always is a turn, by the way, of genuine aristocrats, whereas the fake play-acting elites, just as during our time, they pretend to be fancy-boy optimates, barons, and this just like Bill Kristol and Rick Wilson, where they go on TV and they make fun of the yokel Trump supporters. But real historical aristocrats, like I mentioned now, they always join or form a kind of populist party or people's movement. I say this before, maybe with this example, I mentioned also agrarian populist parties, for example Ernst von Salomon, I believe his brother was leading such a party in Germany in 1920s. This is what genuine aristocrats do, because in a modern mass society, any talk of a quote-unquote aristocratic party is nonsense, so they go

directly to the source of power, supposedly in principle the source of power, the people in order to appeal to them directly. Because anything that pretends to be elite today is actually a demagogic bureaucracy of the modern state, is not aristocratic. So in any case, they formed this Dark Ocean Society of Japan. They had their cover was a populist party and in secret they had the Dark Ocean Society and was private intelligence company, private mafia and other thing, and they formed networks of brothels all over East Asia which they used primarily for information collections. They trained prostitutes to do this. It was very effective. And I tell people, why not? I can make not only pornography that fights our war for us, but I can also train courtesans to this task.

I have already started to coach some courtesans, and they tell me, Bep, do not do this. Do not use the enemy techniques or it will corrupt you. By the way, this is what James O'Keefe does, I hear. Because when you put a dumb man in front of a twink, because they are gay or whatever, You put them in front of a courtesan and, you know, men start to talk big during a date or this and they spill. So he kind of does that. But somebody rightly pointed out to me he has some success. But to what end? He has changed almost nothing. You can say he destroyed the NGO Acorn, but he reformed under a thousand different names. So this is what the argument the people make to me. Do not do this. It will corrupt you. We have to follow the path of righteousness, and I don't know, I ask you, are they right?

I don't know. I trust this man. I have this argument continually with him, so I must think it. I don't know what you think you can tell me. I think I'd like to use the fire of Tibet to fight for us. But the most important part of our psychological warfare is not this, but humor and ridicule. And let me continue tactics commentary on next segment. I want to give you an encouragement to keep up the fight against the enemy, despite Brennan and he sent low IQ Twitter employees to ban all of our friends, but we must keep up the fight. I will give you exhortation next segment. I will be right back. I am a bit exhausted by travel over the last month. Finally, now I find remote location, which seems to be safe.

There is a feline here, a kind of half-feral cat that protects me, perhaps, against demonic ayahuasca entities that roam the jungle. And perhaps I can relax over this next month, and who knows, after next month I will be back to all kinds of hijinks, I cannot tell you in advance, but I have quite a few hijinks planned. And I have a suggestion for you, I put before on my account. You must consider Eleuthera rhodiola schisandra combination, these three herbs. And the first two, Eleuthera and rhodiola, you can find from Gaia herbs. In fact, they are the only ones, as far as I know, who make the right power tincture of Eleuthera. So these are Siberian plants, they grow under extreme conditions of cold, and you add skisandra,

which is I think a Chinese herb and wild harvest I think from Oregon makes them. I have no relationship with these companies, they do not contact Bronze Age pervert, and again forgive if I repeat before, but I have heard from two or three actually different military pilots who tell me that this combination that I suggest to them has greatly improved their flight performance. And the way I found this combination is because the cosmonaut program of Soviet Union used these three adaptogenic herbs to increase performance. These are wonderful herbs. They make you both more calm and more alert, and Eleuthero in particular gives great strength. So I highly recommend you try this combination. But now we turn to what I say the return of humor from 2016. Can you make this spirit come back?

I want to encourage you to keep up and even to intensify this fight on new world order, not to be discouraged by a recent wave of bannings or least of all the election. We are used to fighting against overwhelming odds as we did before Trump and many of us had already many bannings, many, but you can just respawn and it's important now to increase at this moment the satire, the ridicule, why? Because actually the left, which was never sure of its victory with Biden, you remember how unsure after his supposed, the first few weeks in November they didn't know, they were filling it out and now actually they are rather demoralized, they don't know what to do, the The base is increasingly demoralized. For example, with the torpedoing of the minimum wage bill, with Syria strikes, but many other

news that come out every day, his rapprochement with Monsanto and other huge corporations, the inadequate stimulus package compared to what they see Raytheon and other contractors get and so on. It's endless, the news that demoralizes them, and I think it is time to increase pressure of them through mass ridicule and the use of acerbic humor to increase divisions among them. Even if you can come back with a sock puppet account as a leftist, this can be effective. Several friends have now been doing this already, including on Reddit, they pretend to be leftists. You should not be afraid to engage them. Look, what you have to lose if they take your account anyway, let's say that you are already banned. come back and start, you're already banned, so start ruthlessly criticizing and mocking

journalists like we did in 2016. We can respond like Hydra, the community of accounts remains, our camaraderie remains, and you can respond if you take some certain precautions with how you manage the device, you use a different browser and this, there are guides for how you can do this, including how you can get a new number. But now you say to me, Bap, why don't you do this? Why should you? Let's say if you were not banned and you have a 2,000 to 3,000 follower account, you say why should you risk your account and do this if I do not? Well, I am making general call here. I'm not singling you or anyone out, but that's a calculation you'll have to make. If you really think your account is worth more as a rallying point, the way mine is

for sure, I'm not being arrogant when I say that, but it is, then maybe you don't do the trolling on your main or non-account, maybe you get one or two other SOC accounts and the way you do this, you can never be caught if you use a different device and browser and even IP for each, okay, and you do trolling on your second and third account, and I will not say if I am doing this right now or not, I never confirm or deny. But even when you all know me, writing my own account, I'm trying to engage journalists a little bit more now. There comes a time in other words, in war for example, if occupying force, or actually even if insurgent force, if they just indiscriminately apply violence, then the violence ceases to

have any strategic effect, if it's not intelligently applied in systematic way. What happened is obvious. The receiving party just says, it doesn't matter what I do, they will attack either way. So for example, the Poles, the Polish, they reached this condition under the Germans, some say, while in general, for example, on Eastern Front Germans, through brutality and torture and collective punishment, they actually did stop insurgencies, which is the only way you can stop an insurgency, by the way. With punishment, powerful torture, you need to be known in advance that you will torture because this how an insurgent that you capture, this how he will talk even before you do anything. So that's how you do it.

Not the pussy ways that America tries where you end up actually causing chaos, social breakdown and you cause death anyway but because of a pussy morality and a pussy fake humanitarian media at home, you can't apply violence in a systematic and intelligent way, so you get nowhere. And like Edward Luttwak says, democracies cannot do occupation, not in modern world, so do not even try. But so even with the Germans, who generally did well on Eastern Front, I'm not saying moral point of view, but they controlled insurgencies. But even with them, whether by 1944 or 1945, whether it was war-weariness or just the fact that in Poland they had stopped being smart about it, or that merely that it appeared to the Poles that the violence was random and that you could get off so easily even

if you did nothing, so that's why they turned to mass resistance. If you could get killed for doing nothing, why not? So this same way now on Twitter, you see how they ban very polite accounts for seemingly no reason. I think metaphor men was one such, one wall-e, they are extremely polite, nice people, some of them just post video of animal and this and cozy things, they were all banned. So some of the people banned in this last purge were super nice people, they did everything right. They had never broken rules. So then the answer to this must be what you have to lose. Just go all out. I mean peacefully, of course, but go full force with some is that, with mockery, with ridicule. Engage the idols of the left. Constantly show their intellectual incoherence and hypocrisy.

Show to the world again what empty suits these journalists are. And you can do so often without getting banned, by the way. It's not a given that you will be banned. For example, there was an anime account, I forget the name, but this guy, he's a lover of milks. He likes milks. And when these maroons were very arrogantly advertising, oh, you hear that? It's a nice gekko. But these maroons were advertising oat milk, which is not milk. It's not even liquid oat. It's full of pufa, of all kinds of oils and possibly maybe even carrageenan gel, who knows. But a lover of milk went into the replies of this oat so-called milk company and explained why real cow milk is much healthier, much less damaging for environment and so forth. And it was a complete ownage of that establishment source.

And he did not get banned. Now you may sometimes get banned but again they ban you anyway, it's the Polish thing I tell you except now it's done by not Gestapo but it's done by 95 IQ Twitter carpet munching lesbo employee and then enforcing some algorithm, she doesn't understand it's designed with spaghetti code, it will get you anyway, we might get all banned anyway. And the other reason maybe for moderating our message before is gone. Some people were moderating because of Trump after his win. Many people maybe felt restrained, mostly because they thought, okay, we won, or maybe some thought, okay, now we have to present a better face, not be so radical. But now with Trump not in politics for a while, and I wish him luck, but he's been temporarily at least neutralized.

So until he makes a comeback, I will ignore. So don't let that make you moderate. By the way, how funny would it be if Trump won in 2022 in Florida Congress seat, he became Speaker of House with Republican take back Congress, he became Speaker of House and he impeached Biden and Kamala or just Kamala likely to be president by that time. Could he in fact even get 66, 67 votes? How funny would that be? Do not rule it out. Remember, Kamala got perhaps, I don't know what, under 1% of vote in primaries, nobody like her, and most Democrats, their base is going to be so demoralized by having this ex-district attorney, this oppressive, shrill, humorless Martinette who is a whore for corporate interests. And apparently, according to Steve Saylor, well, not just to him, he liked to point out,

and he's completely correct on this, but she's literally a whore in how she got her first political positions on the casting couch, except it's not a casting couch. I mean, God, imagine that. Imagine going to California and instead of being a Hollywood casting couch whore, it's a sacramental casting couch. I mean, how pathetic must you feel to be for that? But things might get so bad by then that Trump maybe will have the required vote for impeachment, but let's say he does not. That would still be the attempt to be one of funniest turnarounds, and it's what America deserves at this point. It wouldn't solve anything, but it would be politics as Bufa ultimate reality show. It's very fitting. But you know, okay, whatever happens, the next two years at least, I'm saying do not

let these other things I mentioned moderate you. We go back to 2015, do not squander this opportunity to inflict damage on their morale and on their They're feeble reserves of psychic power, they have none, they're about as powerful as weak chamomile teeth, they're all but depleted. I talk this with a small black cat friend, you know him, he give me these suggestions, I think them all very good to pass on to you. And this very secretive black cat whisper on my shoulder, he adds of one more important point which is, if we abandon public sphere and we do not keep up this pressure, if we You don't take advantage of their disarray and demoralization now. You can see what they try to do. The lies they spread about January 6th, the narrative of domestic terrorism.

So you direct your energies now to stop this, to delegitimize them even more completely than they are. And believe me, they are very insecure, you know, they're really paranoid about this. Andy Sullivan, the shrill creature who never grew up out of the – he was always a show-off little boy. grow up out of this, and he had Mike Anton on his show recently. He did not let Anton talk, and he seemed weird concerned that Anton, you know, not continue to believe this fake election was fake. Why should he care what Mike Anton thinks, as if he was invested in this, trying not to... They're frightened of that, because they know, even their own side knows it was fake, and the more that Biden, who was appointed very explicitly to be a punishment on the American people.

I mean, nobody doubts this guy runs on a slogan, is dark winter, is one of the most un-American and pessimistic things possible. A guy running a slogan is dark winter. He gets the most vote of any president, so supposedly ever. But it's very obviously a punishment on the American people for daring to distrust and reject the fake occupational class. And so the more he and Kamel falter, the more even zero on side will start calling them on it. So you have an enemy who is on his supposed victory is actually in disarray, disorganized, shrill, defensive, and you should inflict maximum psychological ridicule on them now. Lack of action means you let them regroup, you let them solidify consensus to come after each of us in the way they did after Ricky Vaughn, for example.

Letting them push this vicious lie of domestic ISIS or terrorism or whatever they pushed against him also, but now they're trying to expand it in this much worse way, and they've been trying to meme this ISIS, domestic ISIS thing since Trump years, and they have actually put into action this same plan during Clinton years when the Clinton DOJ did Waco and Ruby Ridge and many other such things. And what I repeat to you is they have nowhere near the popularity they had with Clinton, however. He was a charismatic clown, you know, Arkansas trailer park dancing charismatic clown. And I am not insulting people from Arkansas. I repeat actually this line from Thomas Seven. It's not my line. But this guy, Biden, not as popular as Clinton, they will not have mandates to do what Clinton

DOJ did at the time. So they could try after, just after the election, to go after Ricky Vaughn. But now with healthcare, no healthcare, with no stimulus, no wages and so on, they have to focus on assuaging the anger of their fractious base. So it is time for us not to let them take the initiative again, not to let them pick us off one by one, but break them psychologically like we did in 2016. These are very frail people, there's nothing in them. It's only lust for status, they are stuffed shirt, nothing. And humor is always our best weapon. Without it we are nothing, which is why they try to corner you into affirming what you believe. a snow state and then to get into theoretical discussion with them about such nonsense. Please not do that. Don't pretend you're revolutionary.

Just be humorist. Some is that. Like Soviet Union, the more you ridicule them, the more you discredit them in front of the people. That all you have to do. Stop larping as serious thinker, okay, crap. Stop larping as a political activist. stop playing a role for some journalist or some stuffed shirt academic observer. Humor is what made us who we are. And racism. Racism is funny. People love it. We return to the wildness of our devastation of the normie psyche. Yes, you please join me in this. I can't talk about sex magics as such on this show. First of all, the only meaning of this sex magic. The only high meaning and true meaning is the Vajrayana or tantric tradition in Buddhism. This is the Tibetan which does use sexual energy for personal enlightenment

as well as uses the casting of spells. Some pseudo-feminist liberal commentators freak out about this because they believe the marshalling of sexual power by Buddhist monks who engage in this is actually directed towards the destruction of femininity, the destruction of power of women, and this scares them, okay? But there is also the casting of spells, the magic sex spells in Tibet in this, because some I think of that cult, that religion, is inherited from the native Bonn faith of Tibet, and not from Buddhism as such, and they have Bon, native sorcerer religion, just like Japan has animist Shinto religion, which opposes Buddhism at times, and is symbiotic with it at other in Japanese history, there's an ebb and flow of each.

But as for Bon, this was very interesting to me because Tibet is an unusual place. I believe, for example, the felines evolved there. The entire cat, all the big cats and small cat origin is in Tibet. The cat is a cold-weather mega-beast that manages, however, to infiltrate any zone. I tell you this before, whether it's tropical or cold or temperate, savanna. And it becomes apex predator, is adaptable conquering beast. In savanna, it becomes lion and cheetah. In Nile Desert, it becomes kitty cat. It hunt small rodent and snake, but that is top predator there. You notice, by the way, all these animal, whether it's the house cat or its ancestor, that is a desert hunter of small rodent, small rabbit, small snake, they all become somehow very elegant. Of course, all big cats are elegant,

but I compare to the hounds that have been bred or evolved to also hunt in desert environment for rabbit. And they're also very extremely elegant body and pose. I've been posting them, the e-bees and hounds. And I wonder why. It must be the nature of hunting things that burrow into the earth, perhaps. But then, I don't know entirely true, because Jack Russell Terrier also does this and is a very cute dog, but not elegant. So it's some combination of hunting snake and other particular rodent and jumping, I don't know. But in any case, the big cat, wherever you go, in jungle is the jaguar. In Siberia, the Siberian tiger even hunt the brown bear. It learns to mimic its mating call. So this, what I mean, is this very adaptable, cold weather creature that manages to become

apex predator of wherever it go. And then you look also interesting, the Tibetan, the human now, their own adaptation to high altitude, their biological adaptation is something amazing. It's centered on the lungs and it's said to be inherited from crossbreeding with Denisovans, which is this newly found branch of humanoids from Siberia like the Neanderthal. But this is just basic HBD knowledge now. But yes, when you compare to the Peruvians, the Andean Indios, they have a different adaptation to high altitude living has to do with the great proliferation of blood vessels and the squat body shape in the Andean peoples now. But the tall, lanky Tibetans have instead this other feature, the lung feature, to be

able to breathe in deeper and to live at high altitude, and their adaptation is better than the Andean one, they've been there much longer, and so I believe a deep study of the original Bon religion of Tibet would be very illuminating into the life of such creature and therefore into the life, how to put it, of an entire biome because the human being peak of nature potentially can reflect the glory of its biome. It could be inside this religion, if you understand it, it could be inside almost into an alien species. I'm talking about the Bon religion, native religion of Tibet now and maybe more so a a vision into the remnants of human remote antiquity untouched by other strains, an understanding of primitive mountain biome, of what are needs of pure man of the mountain.

This must require a different turn of the spirit, which in its obscure purity remained clean of the thoughts of the valleys, or of the desert, where the rest of mankind's new religions come from. Maybe there is an atavism that found refuge in the high mountain of Tibet for eons, the roofs of the world. It possibly survived the flood. Well, at least if you consider Judaism and its variety Islam, these are the new religions of the desert, but Schopenhauer, he said Christianity come maybe from the seed in India, which could mean Nepal, and he think that people misread it. But anyway, if you study Bonn, where the swastika faces a right, it is an opening maybe into new possibilities. Here is the creed of the Iceland that is the fount of the felines, meaning the world beast,

the night beast that terrorized men when we were monkeys in trees. Here is the faith resounding off the rocks and high peaks of a supraterrestrial and godlike biome. where old faith has survived, is maybe man's spirit untouched by the political and tedious religions of the Near East. This is what I mean. Could study of Bonn magic give entry to this alien and higher possibilities for man? So maybe I learned Tibetan just for this. But otherwise, almost everything you hear regarding this, I mean the sex magics, and almost anything to do with Vajrayana or diamond vehicle Buddhism, this Tibetan Buddhism in the West is pretentious nonsense, because within Buddhism this is an esoteric tradition, the diamond vehicle. There are three kinds.

The earliest is Theravada Buddhism, that's called lower vehicle, I think. It's called something different by Zen. Then Mahayana Buddhism, higher vehicle, this practiced in Vietnam and China before, part of Japan, and then the latest development is the diamond vehicle or Tibetan Buddhism. So these are different school of Buddhism. So this latest, the diamond vehicle Buddhism, is esoteric Buddhism, which means that the writings, besides being already in difficult language, you have no direct access to it. The writings are almost gibberish, and you need guidance to understand that code. In other words, as esoteric traditions, literally, what that means is they really only fully exist as oral tradition passed from master to disciple directly.

And almost anyone in the West who writes on this did not have a living master to teach them from that tradition. So they know nothing. And you can't learn this from books. And once you know it, you're not going very likely to put it in a book yourself anyway. So it's difficult as a question of a translation, especially in Asia, I hear once of a Chinese translation of Tibetan or of a Sanskrit text that made no sense at all. When you look at original translations, the Chinese completely misinterpreted every important word of it. It was gibberish. Not because of code but because the Han translators were retarded. So imagine if you are a hippie who relied on that Chinese text which was then translated

a second time by some other pedant moron professor in the West, okay, but that such traditions exist in the East of sex magics and so forth is indisputable. We just don't have access to how they're fully practiced, but this brings up to me as a question of whether there are some parallels also in the West. Something that has interested me, why is not there a sex magics writing tradition in the West? I don't mean recent, but something centuries old. Or is there? I don't know. It is easy to say because of influence of Christianity and of Old Testament there is not, right? Because they set themselves against the open sexual license in some Canaanite cults, right? So when Old Testament conceived first probably as oral tradition itself, the Hebrews wanted

to set themselves against other Canaanites and their nature worship. So you have the common place about the Bible's high regulation of sexual morality, to which this is attributed as a success of societies that embrace biblical morality, the buttress of monogamy especially. Right? Roman, Greek, and biblical society are monogamous, also ancient Germanic, actually. And it's often said they are successful because they're monogamous. But biblical morality achieves the stabilization of the family by means of restraint of sexual instinct and all matters erotic. And not by, let's say, a pragmatic and moderate regulation of it as in some parts of the Orient or maybe even in Rome, but rather by means of invective Jeremiah, literally Jeremiah, right?

A social and political regulation by means of casting aspersion on it, on that whole instinct. So then this become off limits as a matter of philosophical discussion and especially religious experience. So it's easy to say this is why such traditions don't exist in the West. You can go in two ways at least, you can go in two ways, in two main ways, in going with let's say a philosophical or religious discussion of sex magics and one way is the spiritual individual path I just mentioned, the best known again Tantric or Vajrayana tradition from Tibet, but a second way is let's say the state or political path, which is what What you might find in earliest laws of Hinduism, in the laws of Sparta, in certain elaborations

of Plato and others, in other words, this is the path of political moral state eugenics. This other way you can take so-called sex magics. And this tool is, after all, yes, this elaboration, you say, of sex spells. Maybe you are not used to think of it this way, but what else is it? directed control of human breathing. It's maybe an abstract and even unromantic, even brutal one, but by the way, so is the individual so-called tantric path. It's not romantic. But it is an extension of that same orientation. And in the Christian world, I'm talking, I'm saying the eugenic path, the state moral path of practicing eugenics and control over human mating and breeding is another way to take, let's say, focus on manipulation of human

sexuality and in the Christian world this path was lost as well as the other one, but at least both of them had to go underground. So the West lost knowledge not only of the sex magic of tantric rituals in this and the bond sorcerer of equivalent of that in the West, but it also lost knowledge of eugenic immorality which is why today you have the ascent finally of people like Pete Buttegieg of the new health secretary under Biden, that thing, and the faces you see in Antifa mugshots of Matt Iglesias and so on. That is final end product of centuries of too much focus on, let's say, equality and monogamy without special attention to the primacy of eugenics and breeding. Because the West lost sight of eugenics for many hundreds of years under a moral veneer.

And this is something many people miss in reading Nietzsche, that his discussion of Christian and really actually the Jewish condemnation of the sexual instinct was not for the purpose of sexual liberation, but of this, the loss of eugenic knowledge. And then the sorcerers or individual enlightenment counterpart of this political orientation is just what you see again in the tantric obsession with the condensation and focus of sexual power to certain ends. And I will tell you just one simple trick, since I promise you an episode on magic. If you imagine something continually at the point of explosion, it is said that it becomes attainable for you if you think it is in high enough focus for long enough. Have you tried this?

Some add also various spells and physical aids and rituals to this simple mental spiritual rite, but I'm not sure this is necessary. Just focus in the power of imagination and direct it through the will, almost by magnetic force toward your aim. In any case, as for eugenics, we've been under a dysgenic regime for so long, I don't know how we get out from under it. I would like to say, many will disagree, but I say in book, free love is maybe more eugenic than arranged marriages when they are arranged for practical or financial benefit. Now in Greece even the woman had to consent to the choice and fathers, this very important, the fathers they picked the husband for daughter not just based on money or influence but on physical and spiritual attributes also and this very rare human society.

And I think, however, when you don't have even this free love is maybe better than what you see in much of the Arab world or in Africa or in India or much of the Orient where only Every financial consideration generally are in play. And the church in Europe, it banned arranged marriages, but the purpose of this ban was not eugenic, but it was to break up traditional clans that actually in Europe did practice eugenics. So you have to take consideration of local context. What church did in banning arranged marriages in Europe had a dysgenic effect. And why they do this is they wanted to break up the traditional local loyalties that could have challenged church spiritual dominion. And I suspect that many pagan rites, for example, were still being passed down in traditional

clans quite late because in a much European society the tradition, the religion that got passed down had very much to do with this, what I'm talking now, the eugenic breeding. Do you understand? There are certain tribes in Africa, very small tribes. As a general rule, by the way, Africans are just as retarded when it comes to breeding as any Orientals are. They do it over heads of cattle or over other forms of arranged marriages. They're completely dysgenic. But there are some small tribes in Africa that their religion emphasizes eugenic breeding. The Nuba, for example. As an exception, they exist there. But this was a rule, I believe, in, let's say, pagan Europe, you see. So in its lust for total power over the soul, the church ended up promoting race mixing

within Europe, which is something terrible because it diluted the Aryan blood with the pre-Aryan blood. It diluted the Aryan blood of the upper classes and of their clans. And their rights were directed to preserving this blood of the gods. And this is among the many terrible effects. And now it's interesting to consider whether some of the heretical movements that I mentioned from time to time, whether they're a Western parallel to the tantric mobilization of sexual instinct toward personal enlightenment, or maybe even whether they're a holdover, a subterranean, let's say, survival of ancient European paganism, let's say, Catharism, was it a survival of ancient European paganism, and it tried to present its focus on sexuality as this personal

enlightenment in a Christian kind of garb, of course heretical Christian, but I wonder if that's an explanation of this Manichaean-Albigensian tribe of the Cathars. And you know these, the Karpokratians, for example, in ancient world, they did not survive antiquity maybe, but the Frankists among the Jews, the Klysts among the Russians, I keep mentioning them, and most of all again the Albigensian orchestras in the West, all of these are said to have used magic sex rights to achieve their version of nirvana. Now taking their theology at face value, how true this is, I don't know because these are also the accusations of their enemies, right? Now, again, remember that the word for sodomite, bugger, comes from bulgar, Bulgarian, which

is to say because the Cathar Pope, the Albigensian Pope, lived in Bosnia or Bulgaria, and they were very likely spiritually descended from Polish Armenians who had settled in Bulgaria from the east. And in the west, in France, in southern France, in northern Italy, they were known as the Cathars or the Paterines, they are said to have allowed liberty and free love for the But I wonder sometimes if they too did not try to develop something like Tantrism, in other words, a theological and refined extension of it, because the Frankist heresy, much later but among the Jews, the Frankist heresy, very similar to the Cathar, theologically, if you're this kind of gnostic, it makes sense that you pursue liberation from the demiurge through modification of the sexual instinct, why?

Because especially when the Old Testament, which they considered the law of the demiur to create the evil physical matter, but when you see that this law of the Old Testament is obsessed with the regulation of the sexual instinct, would you not try to change it and corrupt it? Of course it makes theological sense for those kinds of heresies to push that, but I don't know which way they went with it, we may never know, their books don't survive and what magic books do survive from Middle Ages are incredibly hard to decipher. And now we have this modern theological mania masquerading as a rights movement where the tranny assumption, what is the assumption behind transsexual, that matter can be wrongly configured, that there are disembodied souls that can be trapped in the wrong body.

And yet these disembodied souls still have male or female essences and even sexual preferences. It's seemingly none of this makes sense, but maybe it does as the final result of a millennia-long project of sexual morality and regulation gone wrong that results at the end in the misbreeding and the proliferation of defective specimens who end up with this nonsense, it's It's not even theology, it's mental illness, obvious, and I pray for an asteroid of some kind so as not to let this type of life proliferate. I must tell you now, brief note, end of show, regarding lost city of Shambhala. I am not of full liberty to discuss, but Dalai Lama continues to make hints that there will be a war erupt in a few centuries, that it will originate in a lost hidden kingdom of

Shambhala, and he's always a bit vague, does it exist, is it a theoretical city? But it's a very real city, it will in fact happen. But he always evasive, he plays politician. And this very hidden central myth of Kalachakra Tantra, which is this prophecy from Vajrayana, in other words, Tibetan Buddhism. Only non-Tibetan school is actually Japan, Shingon Buddhism, the personal school of Buddhism of the imperial family in Japan, but is still believed in Mongolia, where the Dalai Lama is very powerful in Mongolia, is received as honored guest. And where this dream of world conquest, of Bodhisattva Genghis Khan, it remained very strong. It is always watered by adventurous Russians, whether Nicholas Rurik, and he had wonderful

paintings or Baron Ungern von Sternberg, which I still promise you a show dedicated to this man of power and to his adventures to re-establish the Mongol Empire as a Buddhist militant world kingdom under Bogd Khan. But for now the Mongols do not have the numbers, but who is to say if in future this Shambhala kingdom is found even underground somewhere, will there maybe not be robots to help them? No one can say this. But meanwhile it's useful to note a peculiarity about the schools of Buddhism. I may have mentioned before, you know, I like the Buddhist Burman demagogue, but he called the UN representative whore and now he support the based military government that overturn the fake elections there and crush the left and crush the globalist.

And of course the Burmese are related to the Tibetans, maybe racially, and maybe remotely by language family, but the kind of Buddhism they practice is quite different. Again, so they are Theravada, they are not Vajrayana. And the 969 movement, which refers to the numbers of attributes of Buddha and of various aspects of Buddhism, this is Virato's Burmese nationalist movement, which is again very strong religious Buddhist in character seeks to protect Burma from the Muslims and their Saudi patrons. And you see, this kind of strong Buddhist nationalism of a successful kind, not only in Burma, you know, this real integralism, this of what it looked like, okay? You see it also in Thailand and in Sri Lanka. In Sri Lanka it was first directed against the Tamil tigers who wanted to break off a

piece of Sri Lanka for the Hindu Tamils. But now it turned also against Christians and especially Muslims. And all of these, this is the Theravada school, which is the old kind of Buddhism. It's called by the other Buddhist schools, lesser vehicle. And the central institution of this type of Buddhism, I believe, is the Sangha, the society of monks. And it is maybe the social and religious power of the monk brotherhoods in these countries that protects them from the pause, that allows them to have a vigorous national life, to resist national dismemberment that arrives with the coming of modernity, which then of course allows the entry of these opportunistic infections like Islam if it exists or like others like the tranny called now in the West or Antifa or whatever.

But it's fun to troll the Western Buddhist hippies with this because you take the words of a Sri Lankan monk on nationalism, but it's not unique. I'm saying all the Theravada countries in which the people are actually allowed their folk beliefs locally at village level, but the monks are the holders of the faith and are held in supreme respect, and I don't know, do they protect the nation because the nation protects them or other way around? I don't know. interesting because in Christianity the old argument including from Gibbon, the fall of the Roman Empire, but from many other enlightenment writer that Christianity weakened the Roman Empire. It lessened patriotism as well as the martial virtues. It lowered both devotion to the state and let's say the strong old Republican virtues

and discipline that were necessary for its upkeep. And from Machiavelli you find also this argument. By the way, Emperor Julian said the same thing in antiquity, that Christianity teaches people to be slaves and destroy the faith and patriotism of the Roman Empire. And Machiavelli says not that Christianity but a misinterpretation of it does this but he focuses specifically on the rule of priests and he says yes, this misinterpretation of of Christianity that leads to the rule of priests weakened men and that it let the world become prey to evil. The priests are both weak and cruel. They do not know how to rule and so forth. They make men, they enfeeble them. Spinoza, same about the ancient Jews, the ancient Hebrews, the rule of priests corrupted

them from a manly kind of federated republic, of military republic, that it corrupted them to weakness made them even nationless, ultimately. And this used to be very recently the standard Zionist argument, please tell Yoram Hazony. And then Nietzsche, of course, say very much on how dangerous for a nation can be the rule of priests, how it makes them not only politically weak, but finally even biologically degraded and he uses both Christian Europe and I think also actually the Brahmins to make this point. But here in the Far East, Asia, you see the opposite, that the monks are, at least for now, they are defenders of national vigor. How it works, what explains this difference, this is something demanding of big serious study.

I have no direct explanation yet, and this is coming actually from a supposedly Pacific and international religion, which is like Christianity in that sense. If you read, I don't know, I have not read Theravada texts, I don't even know, but I read Mahayana texts and they say always that the Buddhist, the guy who does proselytizing, I don't know if they would use the word monk yet, the Buddhist propagandist, let's say, he must always tailor his message to the country at hand, he must never attack the local political authorities but always be ready to adapt Buddhism to whatever circumstance. But in many ways Christianity often tries to do the same, tries to marry, in practice at least, try to reach marriage with local political authorities.

I do not know why is one way in the West another way in the East, it's interesting to find out why. And at first it may seem that only Theravada Buddhism has this quality where the monkhood is actually nationalist, promotes nationalist manly virtues, defends the people. But I don't know if that's true, because the reason, for example, Mahayana or greater vehicle Buddhism does not seem to do the same is because the major nations where that would hold sway. For example, China or Vietnam, they are communist, so you know. Or in Japan, where you had Mahayana militant Buddhism in World War II, which included, By the way, not just Zen, you know about that most of all, but even other kinds of Mahayana Buddhism were militant nationalists.

But you know, they're not allowed to have this anymore as a public force. So you know. Although it's funny, the other day, Lachie Juliana showed me Tamiya Kageyama, who was one of the guest critics on Japanese Iron Chef, classic show, the best cooking show ever. far superior to any American cooking competition shows. Superior, of course, to American Iron Chef, but not to speak of Chopped, for example. This whole show, Chopped, I hate with its sob stories and cringe moments. Whereas on Japanese Iron Chef, it is not a, I consider Chopped to be a poverty show. Even Master Chef is a poverty show. It shows people living together in bunk beds and stabbing each other in the back. But Japanese Irish chefs, you have men with real chef personalities, they're not there

to discuss personal things, and they compete in a glamorous and over-the-top setting. But one of the recurring food critics on this show, Tamio Kageyama, was part of a militant Buddhist nationalist mystical cult, and he died in a mysterious house fire, very interesting. So, such things do exist in Japan still, but they're not allowed political assent, right? There are American militaries there, and of course there are political elites including a ruling party, are whores. They sometimes surface in unexpected form, I mean this militant Buddhist sensibility. You can see the famous politician who say, annihilate everything that exists, annihilate everything that exists. I will run on this for Congress in America, I think maybe in 2022 or 2024.

So anyway, this is why maybe Mahayana Buddhism temporarily seems not to be militant. But as for Theravada, which is what I discussed, excuse me, for Vaiśrayana, which what I discussed earlier, the Tibetan version, diamond vehicle of Buddhism that is also practiced in Mongolia and certain small pockets of Russia, I think it is quite militant, but it does not have a strong base country right now, so it has to remain relatively subterranean in its ambitions. It's always a wink, wink, nod, nod, even from Dalai Lama. But much of its mythology centers on a myth of Shambhala, the lost kingdom, like I say. I was thinking today, the last two or three days, I feel very escapist, you know, last I have to, for the last month I travel too much, it's too much trouble, I exhaust from

travel, I must rest. I was feeling in a very escapist mood and I was thinking how much early 20th century travel myth and imagination mythology and fantastic stories, how much was focused attention on Central Asia, why? Because they could have focused on Africa where there are also mythology of lost kingdom, the kingdom of Prester John and this in Asia or in Africa, but I think Ethiopia, but so So much attention focused on Central Asia and this I think for mysterious reasons. Many try to find this lost city. The Swedish explorer Sven Hedin, he tried to find this Shambala, I believe, Agartha, the entrance. He was worldwide explorer, very wide respected. His most significant contributions, this is Sven Hedin now, but his greatest discoveries

are certain thing in Central Asia, mostly the sources of some rivers, some mountains he explored and such. But in fact, I believe he looked for Shambhala, and his reputation is now ruined because Nazis gave him praise, and so did TR by the way, but that's forgotten, so the Nazis praised him and he liked them for practical reason because he saw them as way to stop Soviet Union from invading Europe and his native Sweden. Is that allowed to be believed? Was he wrong? I mean, think, if you leave Europe in 1919 and you see attempts from 1919 to 1921 to set up Soviet states, Bavarian Soviet Revolution actually, they tried to set up Soviet state. In Bavaria, Spartacist uprising in Berlin, in Courland, in the Baltics, the regime of Bela Kun in Hungary, how would you not be concerned?

And Soviet massive army on the border did not, Hitler in fact, kill one-seventh Soviet population and destroy their industry. Now I say this, I will lose my Russia friends. But did he not in fact stop Soviet Union from what it obviously wanted to do to Europe? I don't know. But anyway, Sven Hedin has many accomplishments, so you should give your sons his book by My Sven Hiddin is called Pole to Pole, you know, from North Pole, South Poland, is very actually brief stories about each of his journeys, very nice book of a real adventure for boy or if you have adventurous daughter, tomboy, you can give her this book. And then there is other travel book which I do not recommend, everyone likes it, by Robert Byron, it's called Road to Oksana, it's a very popular book.

Whenever it was written, I forget 1920s or 30s, and now travel writers gush about it and literally so-called people like it, but it's not my favorite. And he actually says some stupid things about Buddhist art in it. He's one of the English who does not like Buddhism but has a hard-on for Islam maybe. He like Arab men or I don't know. And he insults the Buddhas of Banyan. So I don't like this guy rather. But you see how much intense interest on Central Asia during this time, how much searching and I do believe they were searching for this last city and there were both Soviet and Nazi expeditions to find Shambhala and a famous movie and novel, Lost Horizon, about Shangri-La. I don't like old movies like that by the way but many new myths, not just then but before,

spread by people like Blavatsky and Miguel Serrano and what that name woman, the crazy woman, I forget her name, the Greek crazy woman, Savitri Devlin, she changed her name too. But they continued this regarding lost realms in or beneath Tibet and Central Asia about hollow earth. What it means. And on one hand, I think it's natural, right? Because consider it from bird-eye view, at start of first truly global age, at least in this cycle of history, but at start of first global age you look on map and you see the world island Eurasia, please see Mackinder, please see Haushofer, the mystical tradition of geopolitics. Is it not natural, isn't it natural that all literary and all fantastic imagination would focus on this supercontinent, on its center, yearning to find something at its center.

But if this focus on Eurasia center is natural, when man first gains, let's say, a global consciousness, right, which I mean entirely in a geographic, ethnographic, geopolitical sense, not a moral one, not of a doctrine, but he gains consciousness of global life. And you see attention focused on center of Eurasia as finally the fulcrum of the world. Doesn't it follow that on previous cycles somebody should have built a fortress or refuge in plagnable cities somewhere deep in the recesses for example of Altai, a maze of valleys that you cannot find, in some hidden nook that passed world rulers, they built a great or a palace there, or in Tibet, from where all centers of the world, all the North can be ruled.

Remember, Tibet had ancient empires that stretched into Central Asia, into Siberia as well. It is natural to locate maybe even world capital there, maybe if you are a world emperor. In other words, why not possible that Shambhala exists, that it has persisted through cataclysms. You see, when I read for you this from Mind Eye of Dalai Lama, the gecko I have here in the room makes sound of approval, saying, it is true, yes, it is true. And maybe the cataclysms, the floods, the end of civilization make man forget past cycles of his existence, but in Tibet there arrive legends of this place, or even a map, secret knowledge of things there preserved on a roof of the world, a promise that a mighty army will come now and then for cleansing, purify the world of refuge, they say, in the 2400s.

And this is a prophecy of Shambhala in the Kalachakra sutra. And this, and not pacifistic hippie nonsense, is at the core of Tibetan Vajrayana Buddhism. And it makes you wonder, then, on other meaning of their focus on the six orders of power. How much of a technology of Shambhala is based on gigantic orgone machines that can harness energy of abstinent monks? It can direct it to powerful rays that control either modulate a mind of millions or it can flatten cities. And I've talked about such things, but I have been banned from various establishments for talking in public on this, but look, under all this speculation, which you may find okay being funny, but isn't it possible the kernel of these myths is true merely because world attention is intensely focused on this place?

It was arguably, it was for geopolitical reasons in 19th, 20th century, it was the great game, it was for geopolitical reasons center of world. It was where even Germany first tried to counter England in India through Tibet. It was an England and Russia fight for supremacy of world islands in Central Asia again. And now China, it entered the fray. So it is center of battleground of humanity for the last two centuries, just like the steppe has always been the replenishment of vitality for our species. And so I wonder if there is, after all this, a hidden city, and someday I will meet one of you there in Altai Garden, in the garden in the hidden Altai Valley, and you will recognize a man reclining there among peach trees, and a green-robed brotherhood of warrior monks,

a man with green gloves, and a disc-like shining red emblem hovering above on the Haudebau hovercraft. Until next time, Bap out.