Seaman parameters in Fertile U.S. Men, the Study for Future Families by J.B. Redmond, W. Thomas, W. Ma, and so forth, first published on 6 September 2013, genuine scientific publication. I quote from the summary, black men had significantly lower semen volume, sperm concentrations and and total motile sperm counts than white and Hispanic Latino men, and so forth. This Welcome to Caribbean resumes episode 82, this show about some of various physical shortcomings of the so-called black race, which for mysterious reasons the American state has felt for decades the need to build up a mythology, a lie of black athletic excellence, which I would like to problematize on this show. This is also the race with the highest rates of obesity, childhood obesity, diabetes,

and hypertension, heart disease. Now, regarding hypertension is not entirely to be faulted to the virtue of this or that individual because there are evolutionary reasons for that. In other words, if you evolve in a tropical environment where profuse sweating is inevitable, you will therefore lose a lot of salt. And so bodies, the black body in a tropical environment evolves to retain precious salt. But when that environment changes and move to where there is not sweating and where there is diet high in sodium, the inevitable consequences, high rates of hypertension. And because the great lie today is that all human groups are equal, and it is not allowed to discuss differences between groups. I'm not even talking about things like intelligence or behavior, which of course is true,

but you're not even allowed to discuss increasingly susceptibility to various diseases and so forth, and hospitals are finding that they have to homogenize the standards by which they treat hypertension, for example, which will lead to many problems, Because until now, hospitals knew about the greater susceptibility on part of West African blacks, for example, to hypertension. But now they're no longer allowed to notice that it's going to lead to greater deaths one way or another. Very unfortunate. But like I said, OK, you take hypertension out of the discussion. But physically, if you look at black children today, they are obese. the highest rates of childhood obesity of any one population in America.

And I was having funny conversations the other day with Mena, with my friend Mena Quinn on 4, in which I expressed my concern over the future of squash. It's one of my favorite recreational activities. When I have access to a court, I try to go play this very gentlemanly game. slower taste takes more strategy than something like racquetball which is too fast and brutish for for my tastes but i like squash very much and i was worried because now you see all these articles of oh hiking a problematic because it's too white so we have to fill the hiking trails with non-whites and in particular what they mean is with blacks even if blacks have no special enjoyment of that activity we have to force them to do it. Now I don't think that blacks will go on hiking trails

even if New York Times writes a hundred articles encouraging them to do it, but I was worried that maybe they would be forced on squash courts and this type of thing and that would ruin the game of squash because if you've ever played this you will note that there is very frequent interference from your opponents, and you have to call that. For example, they hit the ball, it hits the wall, it's your turn, but they do something to get in your way, so you can call interference of some kind, or they use the racket the wrong way, you know, they swing it out too far, and it almost hit you in the head, so you have the right then to stop the game, so you got in my way, and this, And so this kind of gentlemanly sportsmanship is very integral to squash, more than other games.

Of course, you watch soccer on TV, it's horrible. The players throw themselves on the ground, but in squash, it would not be workable without these types of judgment calls that the two opponents can agree on. And this is what I was worried about, this judgment call, right, judgment call. You cannot do this with a black opponent, generally. So I was worried this would ruin the game of squash. Menaquin assured me, however, he said, I hope I'm not being indiscreet here. He's not a racist like I am, you know, but he just speaks the truth. He speaks facts. He said, maybe you don't live in America for a while, you don't realize that the black community is not exactly what the American media, state media, which is all American

media now, almost the state media, it shows them to be athletic and interesting, interested in athletic exercises and working out. But reality is quite the opposite because within America right now, the ethos spread by the state and the media is that you should not go to gym, you should not work out. And the black community is one of the most, if not the most, conformist, when they just do whatever the state tells them to do when it comes to these cultural things, I mean, they follow trends slavishly. And so they have followed the trend toward static lifestyle, bad diet, and no exercise of any kind, no gym. They followed this even more than others, so they have been beset by obesity much more than other groups.

Of course, when you go to gym in America, you will find one or two very ripped black guys who they have continued their sports career from college or high school or whatever and they just continued that. So obviously there are exceptions, but as a whole, the black community has been destroyed more than others, their physical being has been destroyed more than others by the new ethos of the American state media culture and so forth. I wish Tariq Nasheed would maybe focus on this, the destruction of the black body by obesity. Maybe that should be his primary concern. But this reality of what blacks are actually like is hidden. If you live abroad, the American media promotes something very different. And it is this mythology of a black athletic excellence that I would like to challenge

on this show. Everyone talk Olympic now. So America won its first Olympic gold medal, very recent, in individual foil in fencing. Foil meaning the name of the blade. This is the first time for men or women anyone wants is for United States the Lee Kiefer is her name But you would not have heard this you you don't know about this person Lee Kiefer Should normally have TV specials about her and so the media government complex is going instead to Defcon one It's a matter of national security to claim preemptively that yes it was a victory when Simeon Bile, that she actually won by losing, that she is the best gymnast of all time, despite losing, and that her pulling out for mental health break, that it only proves we need even more proud black women like the ones who took America to the

moon, obviously. We need them even more entrenched in all levels of society, complete with, you know, what can I tell you about this? There's an important part here that goes far beyond this parody of Olympic Games. If you think about this person I mentioned, Lee Kieffer, the winner of the first winner of a foil contest gold medal in American history. The efforts you put into this as an athlete to compete at that level, when America had had no tradition at all in fencing, it was always very bad in this sport. So this woman's achievement is all the more surprising in the most important fencing blade type called the foil. And also not that it should matter, but she is half Filipina. So it's actually half Filipina woman Wednesday said it's just complete media blackout.

While national figures, whether it's Romney or that fake Texas pirate, McCain 2.0 Crenshaw, They bring out this entire American establishment to shill for this loser Simeon Bile and literally to call her the most muddled Olympian in this, when if you look at a long list just among women gymnasts, she was not even in the top 10. I think she's number 17. They called her the most decorated gymnast or the most decorated Olympian. I've seen these phrases thrown around. But I think she's number 17 among women gymnasts, okay? Not even in the top of 100 if you consider medal counts for Olympians overall. Not in top 100. But calling her the best ever, this is what American media is doing and reminded me of another episode, I don't know if you remember, NASA team, the space program, they landed

a vehicle on an asteroid sometime back, I don't think a year or two ago. And Google drawing, it celebrated this event and it showed the team as mixed, racially mixed when it was actually, you know, the same makeup as the team that took America to the moon and the Apollo program. It was white, nerdy engineer guys, I assume mostly from the Midwest. And one of these was interviewed and he had some funny Hawaiian shirt type thing with a woman in a bikini on his shirt. And there was such national uproar, not over his amazing success in landing on an asteroid, but because of that shirt, he was bullied and then he had to give a Stalinist showtrail type public apology. So that was his national thanks for such a great feat.

It was a fake graphic that lied about who the team that achieved this landing was. in a national mob-shaming campaign for a silly, you know, nerdy shirt that he wore. And this Lee Kiefer business is the same thing. I am sure she's proud she won and she's glad she competed. But on the other hand, what must she feel seeing Total Media blackout of her historic victory and celebration of Simeon Biles' loss and pretense that it's actually the greatest win ever? Tell me how must feel and how such episodes it make me think this question how long is it possible to maintain a form of government that systematically obscures and even attacks and demeans its best individuals even on days when they achieve great things on those very

days it attacks them and presumably by the way how many careers and lives have been ruined and great things have been prevented from happening in the first place right because Because if, think of it this way, statistically, right, what are the chances, if you see these people who get ignored and even attacked at their very moment of glory, or as in the case of the discoverer of DNA, he was ousted from the lab he made after a lifetime. Look it up. He was kicked out of Cold Spring Harbor after he won Nobel Prize, discovered DNA, he created this lab and for some comment he made offhand in some lecture that black Africa is not capable of civilization. He didn't put it quite that way, much milder, but he was kicked out for that.

And think if they attack established, famous, world-famous people like this and attack people at their zenith. Think how many great things and discoveries have been prevented from happening in the first place. How many lives of geniuses or close to genius or otherwise just very able people, their lives have been put on hold or destroyed to make room for people far less even than this simian bile creature or the Kamala who got ahead with not just affirmative action but as is well known by being a prostitute in California politics. So the question that comes up is how long such a state of things is sustainable, how long can you keep a nation going that systematically suppresses its best in favor of imbeciles and losers, which it then apotheosizes to

saintly status, and all of this, remember the Chinese cultural revolution did something similar when it forced doctors to become peasants and it forced serfs, agrarian serfs, to act as doctor, of course, they killed patients, but they wanted to do this to prove that people were equal. But the effects were not so important because China at the time was already agrarian backwater mostly anyway, so it didn't make much of a difference, so it could afford these kinds of excesses. But the Soviets, by contrast, and China itself very soon after that hysterical outburst, the communist world despite the militant egalitarian theory, but math and science achievement, for example, became very highly prized and the best students were nurtured and praised

and promoted from a young age and tested in competitions and such, which is why I don't know if this is still the case, but in many American universities with top science programs, you could go and there would be sections of the science building, the math building, there There will be sections of it called Little Budapest and so on. So now look, a spur could come and say, Bap, you are wrong because America won despite Soviet scientific meritocracy. It's not my point. My point is, without that meritocracy and despite its egalitarian ideology, how long would a Soviet Union have lasted? It didn't last very long as it was, it's 70 years, but how much shorter would its lifespan have been if it had not had that type of scientific meritocracy.

If it had actually been sincere in its promotion of mediocrities to prove that egalitarianism is true. Note what I'm saying. I'm not saying that a meritocracy, even if well established, I'm not saying that it will defeat a state arranged according to some other standards, but that maybe still makes some room for excellence to rise to the top. Because you know, America at the time, it also nurtured and promoted its imminent engineers and so forth, as well as it paid well both in money and praise to import foreign talent. America did that back then as well. But in that connection, tell me who in a couple of years of seeing what's going on now will want to move to the United States to then be run out by a mob because you don't do anti-racist physics in your department or this.

I mean, think it through, whereas America of Cold War was quite a different thing in this regard. See, Charles Murray, on how men like him from middle of nowhere were able to advance through America's own testing systems. So it was not quite that America was anti-meritocratic even then. Yes, it was not a Chinese or Soviet type of meritocracy or I think actually in Soviet system you needed even at times a chess rating to be in certain portions of the government. You needed a high chess rating and that's a very extreme type of meritocracy. America did not need that but it was not anti-meritocratic. See this is what, not even what I'm saying, because while it is true that pure meritocracies like, let's say medieval China, they often get pooned, they get destroyed by warrior

states and things that are not pure meritocracies. But I'm talking here about something quite different. I'm talking about a Sierra Leone or a Liberia situation for America, where you can look Look up General Butt-Naked, look up Charles Taylor. It's the Liberian Civil War, I think, that Theodore Dalrymple, he is a good essayist, also known as Anthony Daniels, but he has an essay about how in, I think it was the Liberian Civil War, they actually threw pianos out the window and burned pianos out of rage. Out of rage of anything white or colonial existing that they couldn't understand, that they couldn't create themselves. an object that displayed to them their own inferiority, right, so they are to destroy it.

And America is already low-key like that, low-key Liberia civil war, low-key Chinese cultural revolution. You can multiply the examples I gave you at the beginning of this segment. And I'm hearing from friends in hard sciences just that they receive absurd communication and threats sent by their departments in this, and nobody can really work in such circumstances. I have a friend who recent got good job in major American research university. He's leaving for a lot less money abroad. He prefers that because environment is just so depressing in American university, right? And when David French and Bill Kristol and other disingenuous Maroons, when they talk about immigrant to America of winning Nobel Prizes and founding businesses. Well, first of all, you can say it's Russian Jews, right?

But it isn't just the Russian Jews. Most of scientist immigrants are actually not even from East Bloc, but from places like Holland and England and France and Northwest Europe in general, the home of scientific genius in the modern world since the 1600s. If you don't believe me, you can look up the figures. Look up who win a Nobel Prize chemistry, who win Nobel Prize physics. Yes, it is an immigrant from England or from Holland or from Norway to United States. And these disingenuous people make it sound instead like it's a dude from Congo that America imported as a hunger refugee kid, and he worked his way up. It doesn't work like that. It import, in many cases, already adult scientists. America buys them, which is good. It can afford to do that.

But tell me who would want to stay in a general butt naked, tear down the statues, mob the white man, burn the piano America. It will get increasingly hard to attract top talent of this kind this way, so burn the piano in the street. Tell me how long that lasts. I don't think very long. And on the other hand, the hissy fit around Simeon Bile is very revealing in a second way. Even before anyone really attacked her, they brought out in this insecure, defensive, hysterical way all of their government and media establishment puppets to pronounce how she is great. It was preemptive, right? It is similar to when the gooboos in England, they lost the Euro Cup for England, right? You know, they were planning to call them the Three Lions of England

and to paste their faces on England's flag with the Three Lions. And, you know, they're planning to show off, in the same way, this mental case, Simeon Bile, as America's black woman spirit, it's going to be the Kamala decade and this. And when this is shattered, right, when this image is shattered, because reality abroad, when these stupid conventions stop at the border, the reality abroad doesn't coddle the delusions of people who are puffed up, and in many ways they're pressured by insane white liberals beyond what anyone can bear, especially at that age. So they crack under pressure, right? So when this happens, the deranged Anglo-media government machine come out in a preemptive way about what's in the end such a small thing.

It's such a tiny event that, especially in the women's gymnastics case, if they had ignored it, probably nobody would have talked about it, nobody would have cared. But instead they bring out Michael Obama and Kamala and Romney and who knows who else to preempt like this, we strong, black woman is America, black woman strong, and this kind of parody-strength propaganda. I always touch these people's buttons with my account when they see it, by the way, because I reveal to them a kind of psychological orientation that they inhabit but they cannot own up to, They need to couch their very all-consuming power fantasies. They couch them under humanitarian rights language, right? So when they see something like my account, it bring up to their consciousness in their

faces things they cannot stomach. So can I ask the DC Catholic conservatives, by the way, the Dowsette and the Vermillo crowd and all of these self-righteous ones, the ones who rail against me and my friends for being pagan, can I ask them, okay, you cannot touch the parody of the Christian Passion play, which is called the Chelicost, the Chelicostianity, I understand you cannot touch that, it's too hot, but can you at least make some time a comment about how they portray Simeon Bile and others like her with a halo around the head? If you look on any picture of this girl now in media, in a newspaper or this, they always put with a halo around the head. I mean, are you at all concerned about the parody of Christianity that exists in a government

establishment media, or will you only take a strong stand against marginal people with a frog enemy avatar? Very brave, right? But so anyway, this rigid defensive preemptive response from regime press that was totally unnecessary probably people would have ignored it but really is the government making fools of themselves which reminds me of a brittle insecure soviet and east bloc media toward the end in the 1980s when they would freak out some time of an absurd small thing in similar a similar hysterical way so i don't think you know unlike others who are pessimistic about the current political situation, actually to be America's absurd condition now doesn't speak of the beginning of a new something. It's not a new woke religion or anything like this. It's not 1917 Russia.

It's more like the last convulsions of a senile 1980s Soviet Union. It speaks of an end of something that how it feels to me. feel to me like era of exhaustion, of ideological exhaustion, which isn't an encouragement to get complacent because I think what is coming in the wake of ideological exhaustion is ethnic militancy and so America is perhaps more like 1980s Yugoslavia than Soviet Union and its near future might be something like 1990s Yugoslavia, 1990s Bosnia or Rwanda, unfortunately. It will be very ugly. I do not endorse. I just predict. But they are acting to me as if they are at their end. And this hysterical hissy fit since 2020, but really since 2016, is them having to cope with realizations that they are a hated minority faction regime with no legitimacy among by

now a majority of American population. And I would add also a majority even of the American professional class, including the middle ranks of military officers and so forth, which is something this ruling so-called class, I call them occupational class, they cannot accept it, and hence this desperate attempt to astroturf the appearance of a social movement of their clients. I must end this long first segment. I will be right back. ... of black athletic excellence. Yes, so-called. Welcome back to show. I am in hotel, by the way. I've been in hotel for the last week, and I apologize to you if you hear extraneous noise. I was betrayed by perfidious African behavior apartment agency, so I had to move to hotel where I will be for the next few days.

And if you hear in background cleaning ladies in other rooms scurrying about making noise, I apologize. I like my show to have high recording standards. But I am here resting in bed with coffee, and I have in background television showing Olympic game handball, women's handball. It's horrible. I did not choose it. team sport are so awkward looking and please, if you have daughter, never let daughter play team sport unless you want to accidentally walk in on her with other solidly built girl and they are doing rug munching and this is what the women team sports are. of daughters, the black race, their fertility patterns are shifted to give birth to more daughters on average than sons. Now that's slightly true for all populations, but black men in particular have far more

daughters than sons, and that is a biological fact that is indication that you are not going to make it as a race. I'm sorry. It's just... In any case, this myth of black athletic excellence that America spreads, it's been taking many hits lately, not just with Simeon Bile and the Osaka tennis girl, but of course the basketball team and many such things and in large part it was already something demolished by the Russian and East Bloc sports programs by the 1990s and 2000s and please do not tell this to Steve Saylor, you know, he spreads the, look I joke, I love Steve Saylor, he's the best journalist and blogger for the last two decades maybe, I say this without any sense of irony. He is the best. But he's wrong on this.

And I will not deny that in certain very limited conditions, West African descent blacks can become top performers in certain athletic events, but even that is in some way highly dependent on context and subject to some odd conditions, which I will tell you in a moment. But I mean, I will repeat to you, I think I say in books that Croatia, which has only existed since 1992 as a nation, but even since then it has more gold medals than India, which has existed since 1947, right? I think I say this in book, India has, you know, 1 billion people and Croatia, I don't know if people realize how tiny it is, Croatia has 4 million versus 1 billion, right? And more gold medals. But Croatia also has more gold medals and overall medals than Nigeria, which is anywhere from 150 to 200 million people.

Nobody really knows with African statistics and so forth, and Nigeria has existed since the 1960s. It has this huge population. It's the biggest and purest bound to country in the world, but they're not very good at sports. Tiny new country Croatia outdoes them. So to get around this fact, there's a lot of, sorry to use this one, but there's a lot of cope, cope arguments are invented to get around observations like the ones I just made as to why in fact blacks are still nevertheless the best at sports. So no, no, Bap, you're wrong. You cannot say that because of X, Y, and Z. So a lot of cope arguments, well, they're not. They're not the best at sports, although again, I will grant that, for example, in sprinting,

In sprinting, an argument can be made, but subject to, like I say, certain conditions that I will tell you at the moment. But what I am saying is that the importance of sports as an arena of propaganda to the American state, sports being the lone area where the case for black achievement is plausible, it's at least plausible. You would think they cannot astroturf a plausible claim for black power in science or mathematics. But let's see, because even then they try, right? Maybe I'm wrong here. Maybe they can. You'd be surprised because they try, for example, with that Hidden Figures movie that tried to write Werner von Braun and the Germans out of the history of the space program and to replace him with Shnekwa. And I joke because it wasn't actually Shnekwa.

If you look at the picture of the woman that is covered in the movie Hidden Figures, if If you look at the real woman who did it, she's a woman of maybe 10-20% black ancestry who acted basically as a human calculator, but, so I mean, they may be brazen enough to try to pretend in 5 or 10 years that blacks are the most distinguished race in the sciences. Certainly they must be in literary theory the most distinguished race, which is why Ibram Kendi is the most important art and literary critic since Lessing. But okay, look, nobody would believe that, right, is what I'm saying. Whereas with athletics, they can make a plausible case to people in general that blacks can excel at athletics, and it happens to be a relatively important thing in a mass democratic

society where, as you all know, America loved their sports ball on Talmud vision. So it's something that the state had a very keen interest in pushing and in erasing any doubts and criticism on this front for the last few decades and so American sports in particular the NBA and the NFL they became edited over time the rules were made to give favor to bouts of sprinting which is to say to showcase the one thing where blacks can do well at whereas if you look abroad at the most popular sport which is soccer which includes some sprinting but many other things too blacks are not particularly excellent at it and black nations do quite badly at soccer and it was very funny to see American sports commentators who are hombre I must tell you the American sportscaster and commentator is

a special breed of psycho neurosis at work okay let's not get into that what the kind of guy who becomes sport caster in America and goes you can imagine they go into locker rooms I don't want to talk about this but they started to complain about soccer the American sportscaster and to talk about how Now instead of two 45-minute part, it should be divided into 10 or 15-minute segments and the field should be changed, its shape should be changed to favor quote-unquote athletics, meaning sprinting. Which this complaint, which is frequent, it really gives the game away on what's important to these decades-long psychological operations in America regarding sports, right? In other words, you have to tailor all sports to showcase the one thing where West African

blacks can become good at, or otherwise the sport has to be obscured from publicity, or it has to be called foreign, and all this has to be called unimportant. So you see this abroad, any sports where blacks don't do well for an amount of time, they are suddenly deemed unimportant or uninteresting. For example, when Klitschko and other East Bloc boxers had basically shut out any blacks from the heavyweight boxing division for many years. It was maybe seven years, maybe a decade, I do remember. And so American sports commentators started to talk about how actually boxing was no longer interesting and it was also un-American and all this. Or even more absurdly, some people were making the arguments how it was a heavyweight division

in particular, which had been historically at the top of the boxing ratings for a long time and it drove the interest in boxing, but suddenly it was no longer important or interesting. This was their argument. Why? Because it had no more American blacks to win, it was all Russians. So actually, unfortunately, Sailor does some of this same thing when it comes to sprinting for some reason to him and a few others who promote the myth of black athletic supremacy, sprinting is the most important thing in all sports. I'm not sure why, why is sprinting more important than throwing from just a purely natural male point of view? I don't know, or other kinds of running, but to these people it's the most important thing.

So I will grant this side of argument that you should not consider, for example, swimming or wrestling and so forth, okay, count those out because they do not pay very much. There is not much interest in watching wrestling, swimming, etc., sports that are completely dominated by whites, but nobody really likes to watch swimming except on Olympic Day, okay? And tennis, although it does pay a lot, it demands too much expensive specialized training early on, and other this which poor blacks would not have access to, whereas with sprinting anyone can do it with no equipment and so forth. This is how the argument goes. Again, it's somewhat of a cope argument to explain why there are all these sports, including

high paid ones like tennis, where blacks don't, they do well but not great, you know. So the example I showed just now, unboxing, which does pay a lot, and the shifting attitude to the heavyweight division in particular, demonstrate however there's something different going on here. And of course the example of soccer I gave you completely destroys all these cope arguments because soccer is the sport that pays the most. And you don't need more than a ball to train soccer in your youth. Many poor countries with kids who grow up abject poverty, like in Brazil, but they do very well in soccer. Other poor countries also. So what is the argument there? There are no balls in Nigeria or Tanzania, no balls in Benin. What is the argument? Why these countries don't do well in soccer?

But come to think of it, why doesn't Nigeria or West Africa do especially well at sprinting either? They don't do well at sprinting, right? That is... So, wait a minute, if this was black natural athletic excellence that gave the fast sprint times, why don't the purest West African bantus do very well? They don't... They do badly. Why does Jamaica do so well by contrast? Did a special breed of black happen to go only to Jamaica and the United States and Trinidad or whatever, but not the ones in Africa? Or is something else going on? Why Jamaica? Why not Senegal? Well, please excuse me. I will try to explain to you on this show the real reasons for this. I take break from this burglary. I might have an almond sweet snack, almond snack. I'll be right back. Yes, welcome back to show.

You may have heard of Blizzard Entertainment is a great American video game company that that is just now being destroyed, supposedly by employees who are claiming a hostile work environment, but in fact it's by the American state. There is good thread by a friend, Kashiwagi, which I will link on my Twitter account where he explains this. It's actually American law and the American state that forces itself on companies such such as Blizzard, and changes their workplace culture and therefore finally the content of what they produce. And in this case, I'm not saying video games are high art or anything, but they can be high entertainment. And you see in this process how actually American culture is downstream of actions of the American state and its ideological constructs.

And so I'm suspicious of this promotion of black athletic excellence, which is something promoted exclusively, it seems, within the United States. And I would like to ask you this hypothetical, what would be condition of blacks in America without this central position in entertainment media complex in sports prominence? Without their position in sports in America, where would they be? Because there are other populations in the country, as you know, that are disadvantaged. For example, the Oaxacans, the Hispanic of the Indio type from Central America who do much of the manual labor, and they are completely ignored in American sympathy and American popular culture. As Steve Saylor points out, there are years sometimes in Hollywood where not a single

Mexican actor or there is sometimes maybe one Mexican actor or one Mexican director, but it's a Jewish guy or it's a Spanish conquistador, peninsular type. You never almost see the squat, four foot seven Oaxacan gets absolutely no sympathy in American culture, in American political life, despite some concessions given to affirmative action and so forth, but the people who end up taking advantage of those affirmative action allotments are blue-eyed, gothic, you know, the descendants of the gods, so they may have a Spanish last name, but they are not Zist, they are not the Oaxacan. And so then there are others, of course, the Native Americans, who is very tragic story. Many of them are very noble tribes, but they are completely again ignored in American popular

culture and the laws that are allotted to give them some relief for past injustices, which are considerable. But these laws, okay, so they have a casino now, but they've been wiped out as a population and the remnants are not treated very well. They are not given any kind of respect by the average American fat. Instead respect is given to blacks because of their position in entertainment, in particular in sports, which makes me again, as I tell you, suspicious. Is this a product of American state social engineering? Is it a psychological operation on a grand scale? And you can also then ask, what would be the position of blacks as such in sports worldwide if you subtracted American sports from that? And I would say it would be a sideline. They would be good at it, but nothing great.

So in soccer they would not be so good, and in some other things, yes, they would maybe do well for sprinting during Olympics. not as if people normally sit around watching sprinting for entertainment, by the way. That's another distortion that's promoted by people who make this argument. So I would say that worldwide, if you subtract American sports, which are downstream, as I tell you, of American state action, but if you subtract that, the myth of black athletic excellence evaporates. And come to think of it, when you look to history, the persistence of racial stereotypes across time is really quite remarkable. Medieval Arabs had the same stereotypes about blacks. They call them the Zans, I think. But they had the same stereotypes

about them that American average racist in 1890 or 1930 did, who had never known anything about the medieval Arabs. It's not like they conspired to have the same stereotypes. So So I don't know, Tacitus, by the way, the Roman historian, he talks about another people in a way that's recognizable maybe to an American redneck who would have similar impressions and similar prejudices against this certain other people, but who has never read Tacitus. How does that work? But let's not get into that now. Insofar as the blacks are concerned, I mean to say, despite the persistence and consistency of these stereotypes across place and time in history, I mean, to say they were not known to be fast runners or anything like this, historically, I mean, for sure, both Europeans

and Arabs, I mean, and actually also the Malagasy, who are originally Austronesians who arrived in Madagascar and one assumes others as well, like the ancient Egyptians, all of these people were interested in the physicality of blacks in some sense in their using it for labor. That goes without saying. It's an unfortunate feature of the human race, by the way, because despite what you hear me saying with, you know, my overall so-called racism, but I disapprove actually of the enslavement of blacks and I think it's unnecessary and often cruel and I think they should have been left to their own development and history and not been disturbed. But I do wonder how, now I can make this argument easily, but if you're an American conservative

Or how can a shit lib say something similar to what I just said? Because if there is no slavery then blacks would not have ended up in America at all So wouldn't that be a tragedy to David French types and shit libs as well? I mean really how do you get around that argument the providence of slavery, you know, if you believe in that He says Phil Henry He's a funny skit about this Henry is one of the best voice or really any kind of performer in forever since forever He's one of the funniest guys on radio Phil Hendry. His politics are terrible. He became deranged about Trump I haven't listened to him since because he became boring a kind of never Trump moderate so-called conservative pundit Kasich type but it doesn't matter. He's a ventriloquist with a

Used to be a hilarious show where he plays characters he does voices and he's a guest on his own show as and And it's always something completely crazy, and the people call in angry at the outrageous things these characters he makes up say, and the people calling in do not know they're talking to the same guy on both ends. So I have not listened lately, but in his heyday, the Phil Kendry show was great. He had one recurring character who played a kind of party line, partisan conservative, again of the Keesich type, which he, strangely enough, later also became. But he he was playing this conservative guest himself on his own show Someone who had served on the Ken Starr impeachment of Clinton and this and this character he made up wrote a book

Thank God for America or something like that. Thank God for slavery But essentially he goes on The Henry Show to talk about a chapter where he is thankful for slavery Because it brought the blessing of black people to America and as you know What would you say to that if you think that blacks in America are a good thing because the colors on the show They try to make all kinds of arguments and it's it's quite harder than you think he he you know this joke character He makes up is easily able to parry and confound them. It leads to some hilarious moments on this show Maybe I find it and post if I can but of course you'd be mobbed if he tried such humor today But this was not that long ago. This may be ten years ago. I don't remember but it's interesting

because it's quite in keeping with many of the abolitionist argument, actually. Like Lincoln just wanted blacks gone from the United States, you know, whereas the slave owners obviously did not. The slavers were integrationists, integrated but unequal, whereas the abolitionists were, with some exceptions, they were the segregationists, equal but separate. And that's a northern, not a southern doctrine, that's an abolitionist doctrine. Even as the Jim Crow laws, they were northern, not southern. So when they were not segregationists, they were actually deportationists even. As Lincoln himself was, he actually went and he sought out a pastor or preacher, I believe, who was making the resettlement in Liberia or resettlement in Central America argument

that once the black slaves were free they had to be resettled and Lincoln sought him out and then his first address to the black congressional caucus was regarding this. So it's not like this was an afterthought for Lincoln. It was central to the end of slavery. It was a package deal without which it wouldn't make sense from Lincoln's point of view. So from the point of view of a Yankee of the old kind, the southern slaver was to be excoriated because he let his love of money and lack of work ethic import an alien race for slavery and he burdened America with this problem. So I don't know how you get around this in the end. If you love blacks in America, you should praise the providential destiny of slavery.

But unfortunately, I do know how the far left plans to get around it, which is they will say that to atone for this, America must import now, or in the near future must import a hundred or 200 million Africans as immigrants because it must become a black nation to atone for all that. So I talked to Mena recently and he thinks that some blue Caesar who promised to stop this and to limit only to some trickle of further Latino Americanos that he would gain the support even of the Maga just to stop this, excuse me, just to stop this catastrophe that would turn all of America into a Nairobi slum, or actually I think worse, my friend in Nairobi now, he thinks it's quite nice, but that's a topic for another time.

So what was I, yes actually, so I don't approve of various nations in history who are trying to take advantage of this, some of the physicality of blacks for slavery, labor, but the important point in argument I'm making is that despite this, at no point in history did these nations note that blacks were especially fast runners or that they were good at sports or such. And you don't need to go to remote history because even in recent times, before Jesse Owens or whoever at the Berlin Olympics, that was Jesse Owens, right? That was the guy who Hitler shook his hand, but FDR did not shake his hand. I think Jesse Owens said that. That is very interesting. But anyway, before that, the blacks were not really observed anywhere to be good at sports.

I mean, even 1920s, 1910s or this, so it's quite interesting then. There is no historical record among any people who encounter them of this supposed excellence and it doesn't exist in soccer or in most sports today where they try to participate. I mean, look, I'm not saying they do bad in these, okay? I mean, there is Pele and there are others, it's not like in India or whatever where it's just bad athletics. In fact, they dwell, they dwell, but they're not distinguished or dominant in most of these soccer and so forth in the way that is mythologized in America. That's what I'm saying. And so then you see, okay, it's limited to sprinting and not in West Africa, but just in the United States, in Jamaica and a couple of other mostly Caribbean places.

So what is going on? Only in a few colonies, And in only post 1940 or 50 times, in these very particular events, if you can call them it, sprinting is not even a sport, it's an event, so what is going on? So there is very interesting blog, Race Culture History, or maybe I have the order of those words wrong, but the commenter, N slash A, I will call him N.A., who, okay, no offense to Moldbug, but N.A. has some very interesting attacks also on Moldbug's ideas. In particular, he attacks the idea that liberalism or leftism comes from puritanism, which moldbug should maybe answer these criticisms because NA actually goes to the scholarly sources that moldbug used to make his own arguments. But okay, so this poster, NA, has this interesting case he made for how the era of black dominance

in sprinting and of certain American sports that have been deliberately made dependent on sprinting, but how this coincides with the era of steroid use. By the way, I'm not a techy moldbag, he good guy, maybe I invite you on show to debate certain topic, we will see. So anyway, NA makes this point about so-called black prominence in sprinting, it's limited to the steroid use era. And NA in this, I will try to find the articles, I think this is all archived, but he finds quite interesting studies, physiological studies I will put on my Twitter account when I find them, to the effect that first of all blacks respond better to steroids than other races so that their advantage may not be in sports as such, but they may have an advantage in

response to steroids, which again is borne out by the historical and the geographical distribution of black champions in sprinting and so on, but he gives also the physiological explanation for it in these studies, and second and closely related to this is that blacks are relatively more resistant to steroid use being found in testing. It's harder to detect this in blacks when you test. So you know, this is often faked anyway, as you may know. Think of Serena Williams, Sauron Williams, right, the NTF posting as a woman tennis player, And how she locked herself in her bathroom and would not allow an impromptu testing when a tennis testing committee showed up, unannounced, at her house. So Serena William locked herself in bathroom, not let them test without preparation, right?

So who will stand up and criticize that? In America today, you know, nobody will. So as I tell you, the American state has had a keen interest in promoting this myth. So who is going to be very particular about double-checking testing results, especially on blacks, and you see the extent of how important this is to America, how far they would go to get their way, when America went out of its way to really engineer with false data and claims the ousting of Russia from Olympics. If you remember, a year or two ago was a controversy around this, which is why the Russians now are the Russian Olympic Committee in this competition you're seeing in this current Olympics. I don't know how they managed that, the bureaucratic hoops they jumped through, but Russia itself

was banned from the Olympics because the vindictiveness and pettiness of America, which engineered Russia's ousting with corrupt IOC officials, I remember arguing with people at the time about this in some detail, it's very clear how America engineered the ousting of Russia with completely fake data, but of course all professional athletes are by the way on drugs and sterons, okay, all of them. It's not just, you know, they're not injecting tren like a trucker on nachos. They are all using very professional, hard to detect things. Sometimes they use it only in an early training period before any testing is done to get an edge in general body composition and so forth. But all of them use it, of all races and nations, which, you know, is a shame, I think.

And I can think of ways to return the Olympics to what it should be, a high-class competition for amateurs and not this kind of freak show. You should ban all endorsement, ban all money from this competition. I don't know. Stop gymnasts from getting pimped out to DNC Epstein functions. I mean, do you see what happened to USA gymnastics team body shape style? I mean, look, I'm sorry to get on this tangent, but actually it's related. I was shocked a few years ago when I look I was just flipping channel. I found some channel with female team gymnastics I say okay here. I will watch it'll be some nice displays beautiful fairy pixies doing acrobatics and that all this kind of Instead of these beautiful small girls that all these cannonball dwarf style, you know, just

Rotund retards around and muscular like the battle to do twirling flips or whatever I found it highly disturbing. But how did this happen? If it was merely about some competitive advantage, then you would expect the gymnasts of other nations to have to turn to similar body style. But the Russian team that actually won this year, you see they still mostly have the nice almost old style pixie shape. So what going on here is this Serena dwarfism, a black body type is being pushed on American female gymnasts, but they are not necessarily winning as a result of this. Why is this happening? Which reminds me, by the way, of the reasoning for the integration of sports in general. Look, this is long subject and I went on a tangent. I will explain what I mean in a moment. I'll be right back.

Yes, welcome back to show. So as N.A., the famous poster from Race, Culture, History blog shows, there are many physiological study that show it's much harder, A, to detect steroids in black bodies, and also they respond much better to steroids, which he uses this to explode the mythology, the state-supported mythology of black athletic excellence, which in any case is only restricted to these short-distance sprints that also some American sports have been deliberately based on them. But before I left off last segment, I was talking about the reasoning for integrating sports in America. The reason given was, you know, if you allow black athletes on your team, your team would do better, you would win. But that doesn't usually work out very well, not just in America, but abroad also.

In the famous case in particular in United States, I forget because I don't watch American football, but I think I was reading it was the SEC, the southeastern states, and the big argument was that by becoming integrated, they would win more often nationally. But in fact, if you look at records, I hear that they did not win more often after integration, but even less than before. They won less often. And I'm not sure about this because this sport is not of interest to me, but I've seen it said it should be easy to check. But certainly you do see this all around these kinds of events inconsistent with the myths supported by American states. So you with England, you see this recent fail in soccer where they were actually the English

team was not playing all that well throughout the tournament. They got paired with teams that were not that good. And then when it came to Italy, they choked, just like Selena, her name's not Selena Williams, what is it called? It's not Sinema, this girl that's been on the Olympics the last few days, Simeon, that's it. Simeon Beil. Okay, she choked, they're chokers. And with France fail also Euro Cup, France has this very so-called diverse team, and it was eliminated very early this time. So you can go back and forth on these arguments. France did win 2018 World Cup against tiny Croatia actually in the finals in the World Cup with an integrated team. But France lost with the same type of team this year. It also lost in 2014 with an integrated team in the World Cup.

And in 2010, they had an abysmal performance where they could not even advance beyond the first round with the same kind of racial composition, you know. So the overall case for mixed teams, not to even speak of black teams in soccer, which do quite poorly, right, when I think it was in 2010 it was held in South Africa, the World Cup, and the hype coming again from American commentators. It is Africa's century, it is Africa will now show finally in sports that it will dominate soccer. And all of the African teams basically, they got eliminated in the first round or two, you know, they do quite bad. But mixed teams also are not quite so good. Brazil, I mean, in 2014, if you remember that shameful performance, Brazil had an especially mixed team that year, okay?

I mean, it's complicated matter because Brazil is big country and it's funny that I as a vicious fascist racist probably have spent more time in POC society and around mulattos and have more mulatto friends and so forth and the shit-libs who prides themselves on having all the Correct opinions but live in 98% white neighborhood So I go live in in Brazil where is very mixed. So I do not attack Brazil. I love Brazil I live there when I can, I like its people. But in 2014, when it was hosting the World Cup that year, it was especially the propaganda that year in Brazil itself. I mean, it was this kind of hype that I had not seen before. It was very off-putting. And they were trying to survive on this hype and this emotional revving up of the population

with propaganda about how we're mixed and all this and we have a young team and we're mixed and very self-conscious, very un-Brazilian in some ways and I don't know if any of you remember the disaster because at the time Brazil was advancing in the tournament through the rounds in very dubious way. It won games that it should not have won. And when people were saying that, when you said yes they won but they played horribly and they shouldn't have won that game, you were dismissed, you know, people were getting all technical on you, or winning is all that matters, the score is what matters, that proves that they are superior, but what was really happening is they were going against mostly weak teams, and they won, actually Croatia keeps coming up again and again in this show,

but they played Croatia in the first round, I think, and they were given favorite treatment by referees, and against sports as a political propaganda. You watch this game, Brazil-Croatia, if you want, and it's very clear. You say Croatia lost, but it was playing much better. It should not have lost, right? And you could see the Brazilian team was fake and hype, and then they went 0-0 with Mexico, and then they were given favorite treatment again when they play Colombia, and they won that game. But again, you watch it, they shouldn't have won. So look, there's a reason I'm getting into the details here to show you how sports are manipulated quite easily for political show, I mean, political propaganda.

So Brazil was being promoted for this PR reason towards the win, towards the win of the entire tournament. And you could see, and even though they were playing terribly, and again, if you told this to any of the fanboys at the time, you were mocked and confronted, oh, you're coping and how dare you say that, you can't accept that they had a fair win, they're a diverse young team. They're just better in this. And then when they faced the first good team, they faced Germany, right? And I think this was an unprecedented disaster in World Cup history, in the quarterfinals for any good team, I think, that Brazil lost 7-1, okay? I think that's unprecedented. That's like losing in football 50-4 or something like that. I don't know football scores, but I imagine it's something like that, 50 to 4.

And I remember the political teeth clenching at the time. How dare the German Nazis beat the Brazilians on their home turf, 7 to 1. They should have stopped at some point. And look at the Germans, how they cannot just win, but they must destroy his opponent. The German is still a Nazi and lacks sportsmanship and all this. But then when you listen to interview with German players, they said in interviews after After the game, they could have taken the score into double digits even. They chose to be nice and they stopped at 7-1, which is an absurd score. But I have no doubt that they could have kept going, because if you watch the game, Brazilian team completely collapsed. They had nothing left. You know, they emotionally collapsed, they had no defense left, nothing.

I think it was similar situation actually to what you see now with Simeon Biles and Osaka and others where for political reasons so much pressure is placed on young unprepared and frankly not It's not that they're not talented, but they're not the best in the sport not by far and the pressure on them is not justified So in other words in the American case, it's very hard to tell somebody Look, you're an avatar of your race You must succeed because you must prove its supremacy in the service of our nation But also by the way, you should hate this nation You should have contempt for it in its history and most of its people by the way hate you and yours And this is what cinema Biles or what? Is not cinema Biles Whatever name is, you know this girl, right?

She's being told essentially all of this so why if you are her would you keep going, you know? But this is long tangent I mean to return to point I make before that the Serena the Shaboom of Wimbledon which is you know the testing First of all, it's relatively easy to fake it. The American state has an interest in not scrutinizing black athletes because of the propaganda reasons, but then even when they're tested simply for reasons of physiology it's harder to detect presence in blacks of such substances. And this is N.A. Point in blog, again, Race History Culture, look it up, which he supports both with historical observations and with some physiological studies and really the myth of black athletic excellence is built on susceptibility to sterons in this manner

I briefly describe and this is long argument you might say is cope But remember it is the other side that engages in cope to explain why American sports should take precedence over soccer and many others Kinds of sports where blacks do not do well or why Africa does so poorly Despite many of these sports you do not need money or resources and so forth and so much then for this topic, but what is important to remember in end is that the PSYOP, the psychological warfare propaganda purposes for which American state enrolled its sports culture as part of the so-called civil rights struggle, which is really, what is it, it's a tyrannical ploy by the American bureaucracy to wrest more control over large sectors of society in the name of racial equality and liberation.

But just in the name of that, with predictable results since blacks are actually not helped by post-1965 changes, but only the oligarchy benefit and its peons in the federal bureaucracy and so on, and these last prosper at the expense of the white middle class that is targeted for wealth expropriation and for political overthrow. and it is this task of the American state that it has accelerated in our time since 2016 and so forth and this psychological warfare operation that I've been talking about on this show is just part of this story and it's a I think it's disaster because it happens while American population at large become obese, disgusting to look at, I think something like a fifth to a sixth of American economy spent on medical care and more than half of that with regard to

obesity-related problems, and the black population in particular, which could be healthy and is historically healthy, like all native populations are historically healthy in their own environments, but in America it is the most unhealthy, the fattest, the most diabetic, and to offset or hides that this myth is pushed ever more aggressively of so-called athletic excellence which is disgusting overall because it's part of a popular culture slash entertainment complex that again is used for political manipulation and sport should not be used this way. The real meaning of sport which should be open to all races and many different types of people of, now I sound like shit-lib hippie, but it is true. Many different, you know, HBD means they can all do well in some activity or other, and

the real meaning of sport can be found at a birthplace of Olympic in ancient Greece, and I may do future show on this so you understand not just biological meaning of sport but even its religious significance, and the religious meaning of athletic competition, its effect on eugenics and breeding, a matter of special importance for me, on which I might write something very soon, but that is for another time. In any case, this has been a calm show on forums, old forums related to burglary matters. I hope you enjoy. Until next time, Bap out.