Welcome Caribbean Rhythms, episode 83. And, uh, well, you know what happened. It looked like the horse-faced, hairy-legged, hairy-legged Lisboa Security and Trust Brigade threatter that they won out over the, um, the opposition. I imagine there was a sensitive, uh, tech guy, or some tech faction there, a faction of tech guys, possibly of a Oscar Wilde persuasion, who liked, uh, perhaps the photographs I posted on Thursdays and other such things, and maybe who had some residual dedication to techno-libertarianism, and it is for this reason that I lasted on Twitter even as long as I did, maybe. But the old guard of these white tech gays loses ground now to the Bergen-Belsen desboid The pussy smell of rotting dumpster is this and so these ones finally got me banned

I imagine so and if I had to guess why it was because of my non-lympics post the non-lympics Okay explains this on my telegram channel Which by the way some housekeeping is in order because of recent events. Make sure you follow my public channel on telegrams the link is t.me, of course you have to do https and so forth, but t.me slash bronzeage palestra palestra spelled p-a-l-a-e-s-t-r-a that's one word, bronzeage palestra with a-e in the middle I will be giving regular updates there from now on even if they reinstate my account which I will bully them into this and I may also start adding shows again to YouTube although that site is also unstable. Finally, make sure you go to Twitter and that you follow ItIsNotMe, but it is a consortium or a bond of a melee artist and sound engineer

that are residing in Switzerland and Austria. And they support our kind of aesthetic movement and the spirit of Hellenism that I have tried to troll on behalf of for so long now, but their app on Twitter is Caribbean Virtu. It's spelled, well, the word Caribbean, C-A-R-I-B-B-E-A-N, virtu, like virtue, but without the E at the end, the Machiavellian word for manliness, the ancient word for manliness, for Andrea. It is spelled et Caribbean virtu, as you heard. And again, it's not me, but it's a special collection of friend, and it promises to be an entertaining account on aesthetic postings, excerpts of philosophy, as I hear, they will also post excerpts of my show and such, and announce my show.

And such boons are to be commended, and I believe that, given all of this internet strangulation of any interesting points of view and increasing censorship, all that will be left soon on Twitter, and any of these social media platforms seem to be marketing PR for approved political oppositions commercials and commercialized so-called counterculture of the left like the chapel chumski Oliver Stone left Which is what Twitter was originally created to disseminate in the first place this Hollywoodized commercialized version plus of course a big company like coca-cola Pepsi making commercials and only allowed opposition as the same type of neutered left you see Oliver Stone or Or Hollywood movies where CIA and WASPs play the same role that the Jew plays for the hyper-emotional

white nationalists and so forth. Exactly same mindset, same conspiratorial thinking, but for the left, the WASP take the place of the Jew. If you watch the Good Shepherd movie, not such good movie with Matt Damon, but you see there the WASP Rockefeller deep state Nazi old guard and so forth. But anyway, to return to the topic, I do not believe necessarily stories that I was banned because this or that group brigaded or in other words mass-reported me. I've been widely hated just by this impotent left that I mention now, widely hated by them and similar for years, as well as by housebroken social conservatives. They've always hated me, the fake Catholics and such, not the real Catholics. And they've tried mass reporting me for three years at least and it's never worked for them

because I know very well how to step around Twitter's idiotic rules. And now there are mutually opposed factions actually who are claiming credit for my banning and you should take this as a sign that these people have the pettiness of middle-aged barren women because it's not a win to them if, you know, mods, we have a rule breaker and you call mods out. This is not a win to you if Twitter mods censor me, which I will be able eventually to get around with in a number of ways by the way I can do this. But these are just petty spiritual females when they say this. So, you know, some have shown their faces, you can ignore and block them if you wish, but don't take them at their work that they got me banned because some of them are getting paid for this type of thing.

They have to claim that to justify their meager salaries. Oh, we got bad band in this. It's called disrupting radical networks in this or de-radicalization or de-politicization. They get paid a meager salary for this through which the American state launders this kind of political policing through NGOs. And second, there is a journalist who claimed Twitter told him that I was suspended for ban evasion and this is a friendly journalist I believe mostly but you also should not believe as this even if it's true that somebody at Twitter told him oh we banned Bronze Age Perverts for ban evasion because I've been on this account for three or four years now since 2017 so whatever they think they know they've they knew before right but still they let me stay for years so you

So you know, Twitter bannings these days, as you see, are hardly shocking, but they are so subjective and capricious, it's almost inscrutable when someone gets banned. Why in another guy who stays, I've seen people make death threats, I've seen people posed with weapons, in camera pictures, they do not get banned. But in my case, I believe it was an executive decision, like I say, because once you get account big enough, it's actually quite hard to get it banned for any smaller reason. It takes executive decision. And I think perhaps some faction got the upper hand over another. And the reason for this was my Noglimpic tweets. And I told you some time ago that given the extreme sensoriousness on these social media platforms now, actually it means you should intensify trolling.

You should get more aggressive. You should tell the truth even louder, bolder and a more mocking way with the truth because as you can see, you will get banned anyway even if you do not break the rules. They banned Molyneux who had hundreds of thousands of followers and as far as I know he was simply a normie classical liberal, a bit aspergerie in his argumentative style but mostly held centrist positions in every way and I believe perhaps all of the quillette people will be banned too, especially if they step out of line on the transsexual thing, for example. Next, the trannies are the most vindictive and active group on these sites, you know. Okay, I believe it was the trannies, they got so mad at my shows on the gays, they reported, mass-reported me to SoundCloud, that's different.

SoundCloud even more censorious than Twitter, but both are basically very unstable sites. So what I'm saying to you is that even face-fagged normies, middle of the road, they are going to get targeted and already are being censored. So why not just let loose? Like I tell you, when you go to restaurants, you can be uninhibited, let loose if they forget something. If you feel free to walk into the kitchen, a bang, kitchen door open, demand pickle, demand special mustard, all of the. So here, I was going freer in my commentary on Twitter lately because I knew we could all get banned. And it is for this that I was suspended, because something unusual, the night before my banning, I was getting a really high, unusual amount of normie interactions because of my Olympics posts.

As you may remember, since my last show, I had been posting about the wins of white athletes in sports that are in the United States, interested parties, let me put it that way, interested parties in the United States have tried to make certain sports like speed running, short distance, athletics in this, high jump, this type of thing. They've tried to make it the preserve of blacks only. And I posted many such example, including with images of gymnasts and short distance racing where in hurdles you see Karsten, the Norwegian viking, he won, setting a world record that is likely to last decades. And also I posted Polish team, they won Handily the relay race, The American all-black team did quite badly. This was a 400-meter relay race, something I don't remember.

And I also posted Epke Sonderland, the flying Dutchman who put maybe the best gymnastics performance ever in a previous Olympics. I think it was 2012 Olympics, maybe. But I put this with video, which really pleases many people and upset many. He's actually quite hard to find this video of his performance, even though it's one of the most amazing shows ever put on. It upsets many people to see it, so many other examples such as the United States would be far behind in medal count this time if it had not been for white swimmers, and the United States would be doing very badly. So I talk on this last show as well, it upset many people, and I did complete media blitz on this matter, on this topic, in other words.

And the night before my banning, one particular tweet was amplified by Twitter algorithms where they put you in displayed categories, right? So it displayed this tweet of mine in categories like animation and art and culture, which are quite amusing. It was about this cartoon that, in my opinion, perfect showcase of what America has become. has become a bunch of whining, roided-up, let's say, gentlemen of melanin persuasion, roided-up, puffed-up, psy-upped, who get third place even so, and then cry about Russia being at Olympics and so on, or China, and his perfect image of this new POC America of puffed-up, propagandized non-entities who are clients of the regime, who are crying in their entitlement

when they are not given they do by foreigners or by events of reality which do not respect these customs and such. This difference given to America's retarded children by craven white shit libs. So you know it's really, this is a nuclear subject, Menav was telling me this, I was having a talk with him after I got banned, he said, you touch on this matter of athletics which to the normie is sacred. gets the normie fired up more than his loyalty to a sports team or to an athlete, even if it's just Tom Brady who is a good guy, but try arguing with one of Tom Brady worshippers, right? So you mix that a demotic worship of sports stars, you mix that with, you know, if you tarnish that, you mix that with racism, and that is such a hot topic combination that

even a chalakos denial is worse to these normie people, these things. So indeed, the night before I got a lot, like a lot more than usual norm interaction, because of what I just told you, Twitter's boosting algorithms where they showcased my tweets. So you know, maybe that's why, or not only that, but that brought it to the attention, because I didn't break a rule, you see, I didn't even post the cartoon myself, but it brought it to the attention of somebody high up at Twitter, who was maybe personally offended enough for these same reasons, that whatever goodwill I had won with his, let's say, invert colleagues because they find the images I post sexy or what, but this episode really did it, this posting really did it, and they banned me, okay, so I'm guessing it's something

like this, but we will never know. And some people sent me also a more exotic theory because I had posted a few days ago rather directly and maybe too explicitly about the Tamil tigers and my interest in their organizational form, but there's no need to get into that. I assume that is not the reason, but that's another new thing you can say I did. So in general, I find, like many of you, I find my Twitter is stultifying because of all this. It's like trying to post with hand tied behind your back in a straight jacket. It's been like this for two years. The fun of trolling is gone, but I wish there was an alternative I might also get account on site like getter, but if I do I will confirm it again Please check the telegram channels that I told you it is

https dot blah blah blah slash slash T again T dot me slash Bronze Age Palaestra one word. That's one what Bronze Age P a la I will confirm there any such account or whatever. You have to consider, on the other hand, the blessings of what happened. I mean, the real blessings, even of this banning, not, you know, Coke blessings, but the real blessings. My book shot very much up in sales rank. I mean, it's been doing well, exceptionally well, even for the past year, the whole past year. Since the start of 2021, my book has not left the top 10,000 rank. It's always been the top 10,000 on Amazon. And you know, this is a site with millions of books, so top 10,000 is great. And for a self-published book three years after publication, it is unheard of.

Top 10,000, by the way, just to give you comparison, is better than almost any normally conservative book you hear about. And I did it without any institutional support, any marketing, any book parties, all of this, no publisher, and all of this. By the way, their book often goes under rank 10,000. So in other words, they go rank 20,000, 30,000 or even lower in their first year, and this is my third year. But since this banning happened, I guess it was last Wednesday or Thursday, I don't remember, but since then my book has not left the top 1,000. And it stayed around rank 200 to 250, 260 for two or three days non-stop, which, you know, it's an amazing thing. You know, so thank you, Twitter, and thank you to my haters for the notoriety and the nice sales you bring me.

That's more and better champagne for me, and more and better whores and coke. And enjoy your box chardonnay and lobster risotto and fat lesboid wives, I suppose. And second, it's brought me many new subscribers to my show and I welcome you if you're a first-time listener. And if you hear me now, I say, I thank for your support. This allows me total independence of any heritance, any influence, any other concerns. But I have only to speak the truth in my own manner, which I continue to promise you to always do. To speak the unvarnished truth in my own, you know, I say, entertaining manner, yes. But the truth itself always has a certain nice smell, maybe the most beautiful glint of all. The pure truth which must always be the truth that no one else is allowed to speak or hear.

But of course I also add to it, as I say, it's my own kind. I've been called the humorist, as this is great honor. So anyway, I think with this show, the Telegram channel, and I may increase the frequency of my long form writings in various places, I will announce them. But it should be enough reach for now. Remember, I never thought I would have a national or normal reach with my message. I never sought that. And I say this not as a snob, it's just a matter of fact. My particular position, the views of let's say the followers of Friedrich Nietzsche around the year 1910 in Germany and France, the views of men enamored as a friend, well put it recently, obsessed with primal errors, connoisseurs of civilizational destruction, the high vision,

the vision, you can say, of certain anti-social ancient Greek and Tibetan factions. This was never meant for mass consumption, so maybe I'm okay with less exposure. I actually do not think my core audience will be any less, but undue exposure is less, and that may be a good thing. This temporary shade will allow me and will allow us, our friends, to grow like a snake in shadow. Now, this being said, I repeat to you, the bond I mentioned, the artists, I believe some of them are Latino or mid-bodybuilders, Mediterranean bodybuilders as well, so you know not only nor did, but the artists commune that goes by the name Club Tropical Excellent GmbH on on Twitter, follows him for a continuation of the type of vision of life and of the future that we all have in mind.

But very good then, I go for a usual cigarillo break on a balcony and Jack Dorsey is here. He has abandoned his techno-libertarian roots and has become the simp and the sub of his with H.R. Harrodin Department, but he want to do foot pedicure on me, and I find this very, I don't know. Well, look, I'll be right back, okay? I go to break. Yes, welcome back. I do not want to make this whole show about censorship or my banning, but I should say here I've been much honored by the support shown by the frogs, the love you've shown me in the tweets, and I see and appreciate them almost all, even if I can't possibly respond to all, But I, in particular, like to call attention to thread that 0hplovecraft on Twitter made. I cannot read out his at, because it's too complicated a robotic code.

But you all know him. He is big account and also writer, and he has a nice thread comparing my Twitter account to a kind of kingship in our sphere, maybe over the top comparison, you would say. But really, leadership of the alt-right, or whatever you call it, is something I never sought, but was pushed on me because of the attractiveness and evergreen power and fire of the message that I bring, which is the immortal voice of Nietzsche and of Greek antiquity and his great project, and this will always light kindred spirits on fire. And so he has a very nice thread on this, Zero Lovecraft, on camaraderie, on leadership, and in fact on the burdens that leadership brings, and it was an honor to read it. And second, there's another nice thread on me by Doon Vorkanen. That is his ad.

Doon, he's a very good frog and he has an amazing thread too, detailing our old friendship and in the replies and quote tweets to his posts. You can find many testimonials agreeing with him because, you know, in private I have always tried to support other frogs to promote them because really no one else helps us. So this is a cliché, but true, we must help each other because no one else will. And this is how actually certain hated sects nevertheless managed to do well in the world. They can last in this solidarity longer than others can focus attention of hatred on them. And it isn't only the substance of my message or the attractive historical things I post that makes people like my account, but also this, which contrasts, I guess, then to many

other individuals on the right who have styled themselves as leaders of the movement, which again I never did. But they call themselves this, it's very pretentious and I'm an important person and I'm relevant and so on and they claim leadership but when it comes to it, they can't handle it. They engage only in bitter fights and dissension and narcissism and everything for me and nothing for you and all this and you must respect and many such things that unfortunately is a so-called hard right and come to think of it, not just the hard right but I've known nor me conservatives before, and even the conservative right has often the same kind of infighting and narcissistic personalities drawn to it, a big reason it never gets anywhere.

This kind of view just attracts these types and they quickly alienate potential allies, they have no ability to create any kind of camaraderie, they're queens, okay, in many different ways they're queens, not kings. And such types, they have a great hatred of me in particular, not only because they felt I got the attention that was their due, despite the fact, again, they have almost no original ideas, rarely do, and certainly no generosity, but also because, you know, not only have I never styled myself a movement leader, I also never pretended to be a serious thinker, okay? And I still don't. actually any irony, I'm an internet poster, I'm a humble internet poster and a troll and a humorist, and to such people that I should get attention with a name like Bronze Age

Pervert, when they see themselves as modern ideological partisan leaders and very serious and there are new marks and all this, it's intolerable to them. So you know the type, the slighted intellectual with delusions of grandeur, which actually Such types are rather more common on the left. And also in this case, you see, after I was banned, you see the bitch moves, the passive-aggressive bile against me, especially by some on the left who have glommed on to us because of the media attention focused on the frogs and the kind of genuine counter-cultural power we hold. But on the left and those who pretend to be on the left, those on the left who are obsessed with us and our thing and pursue us because no new ideas or energy really on their side.

And above all, they desire to be seen as the real revolutionaries and the real dissident thinkers, and they greatly fear that others should be seen as more so, especially if they have opposed ideology. And people who think it's a resistance to repeat these old boomer left Hollywood tropes about Nazi, deep state, Rockefeller, CIA, and this, and they are celebrating my banning, and I mean imagine what a bitch in the soul you must be to celebrate censorship of a perceived rival. They were never my rivals, by the way. I never did nor will acknowledge them by name. I never paid attention to them. But now that I am temporarily not there, they come out in force, and I say all this because Because I want to add, I appreciate not only the great outpouring of loves that the frogs

have shown me, but also that you drag these posters, these pathetic people, and you show them to be the blusterers and the empty regime loyalists that they ultimately are. What is the Reddit human being? The Reddit. Reddit is almost a pure expression to the point of parody of Nietzsche's and Ortega look up Jose Ortega y Gasset, of the herd democratic men, the herd creature, the herd without the master, which seeks to police itself instead with these rigorous endless moral bullying, moral casuistry, condemnation, the so-called ethical distinctions that, where this morality comes from, by the way, what is its foundation, they do not care. You look on Reddit, how much they try to self-rationalize, feeling good about, for example, being a slut or being a glutton.

I would much rather be around a slut who doesn't feel this need, but the Reddit being wants to read, for example, a book called Ethical Sluts, so you know it's not enough to get off. You have to feel like you're a good person, a moral person while doing it. Or the poor bugs, the bugs among them who imagines themselves Catholic or Christian, But really they insult this religion because unlike a medieval Christian, they never lived on the edge of sin and with a view to the natural human fallenness. The medieval Christian knew he was a bug whose nature could not be trusted, that salvation for such a creature could only be found in salvific sacrifice as in the New Testament. But the modern pseudo-Christian has a view that somehow merely claiming you belong to

Christian tradition or a faith or a group, merely in claiming that you have good intentions, that this means you never had that shameful and vicious devilish nature of man. And in so doing, by the way, I think, if I may pronounce on this, that they mock Christianity, if I may say, because it makes the entire Christian sacrifice then pointless, since such people are entirely determined by the customs and the constraints of others. Don't I mean this they don't seem to believe in or even need in the first place the salvation that Christ brings So you just see how much a feminized church today? For example will protect the cheating wife or an adulterous you hear this many times many men become Disgusted with their churches because they see the church pastor or priest or leader of community

They make excuses for an adulterous for example or for a woman who murders her children trying to deflect blame and such sympathy for women in particular has effects then that corrupt everything else as you can see. But such people, if I don't read it, minus the pretense to religion usually, but the Reddit is important because it shows in this very clear low-level naive way, it is the forum of intellectual acclamation to human domesticity. That's what a Reddit is an image of. You want to see the self-policed herd that wants to deem any deviation from the cult of domesticity as ineffably evil, and you're a horrible person in this, even to think such things. For example, a Jew dork Reddit commie, a pinko commie confronted with my book, if they should

even read it, they will find it so intolerable because it brings to the surface all the things that the Reddit mentality tries to suppress, which is for example human unmanageability, in particular a real man's natural ungovernability and his desire instead to contest sovereignty in some way, which is another way to say to seek living space in the real meaning of that term, which I explained in the book. And the suffocation or smothering of this question of sovereignty is behind all of Reddit, All modern, you know, democratic morality which sees even contemplation or, you know, bringing up this question as something evil or ridiculous and they try to laugh at and mock it makes very uncomfortable, makes them very uncomfortable which is why when I talk

for example of piratical brotherhoods or mafias or of infiltrating government institutions as a temporary measure in some ways but they freak out, they claim I must not be speaking seriously or I have ulterior motive or they cast aspersions on my readers who do take this seriously and they come up with lurid conspiracy theories and lies about me because to them above all you must not you cannot contest this question of sovereignty I put it in a different way in my book in talking of own space but instead you must retreat to the communal which is to say the woman-centered social life policed by consensus norms and ultimately unable to ascend beyond domestic life and a blinkered vision at forces on men, and a life under

the unquestioned umbrella of a force that pacifies all and remains secret. You can never challenge it nor question it. Just to give you some more example, there was some faggot, someone showed me an interview about my book between some faggot. I'm getting attacked hourly, whether I'm on Twitter or not, but before there was this faggot and tranny in Japan or something, they did a show about me with a kind of gay voice complete. I shouldn't throw stones at all dogs that bark at me. You stop to throw stones, you never get anywhere. But this interesting example of how far these people misunderstand, how far the regime loyalist misunderstands what I am doing in the book and other way in my show or the Twitter.

But he was saying in this aggrieved way in this interview about my book that I mislead man with wild thoughts, and that in fact, well, what's the big deal? Because he has a friend group where they talk about gaming and this, I mean, and that this is well-adjusted, while on the other hand, what I suggest in the book, so you see, to these people, in this small example of why the herd male, the herd male, can never understand what I say, because to him, for example, talk of friend groups is a way to show to others that you're well-adjusted and socialized, that you're not a loner, which is to them low status. Whereas, when I talk of manner bund or of these aristocratic fraternities, it has to do specifically with the attempt to contest sovereignty in a state territory.

And this is why I don't call my book a self-help book or this. So above all, they seek to demoralize any attempt of men to form such bunds or circles or fraternities of the real and not parody college kind of fraternity, but true fraternities like existed in aristocratic Greek states, hetairia, they were called, associations of men with great plans, which must first of all be great political plans. I do not want to hear this historical point in any case of scientific or literary circles or prayer club, this kind of masturbatory nonsense. In our time, the only focus must be on contesting sovereignty or that other supposedly higher stuff is as good as playing puzzles or video game or having circle jerk clubs. I explained this before, but like most of these trannies, this is what they do.

They have circle jerk clubs. But if you look at Osama bin Laden, who is a man from a very rich family. He could have become a New York, Saudi playboy in New York nightclub doing lines of coke and engaging in scatological fetish with insta-thought, but instead he chose a life of fight and struggle and he died for it. I'm not saying you should be al-Qaeda and this, now they will twist that around, but this is example, okay, as example, you have to be able to pull yourself out from the everyday world of smothering women and of Reddit self-protection and socialization and this. And this kind of argument, so odious to them, the thought that this could happen, that you could have a, let's say, a kind of political bond among groups of men who rise to a higher calling,

a resurrection of ancient Greek aristocratic mindset or fraternities, of mafias and such. The thought is that my book might awaken this desire in men. These are men who they want instead to be walking ATMs for their healthcare nursing home society. That's what I mean, their anger and their co-hysteria about me and their lies and my book is motivated by this, you know, their lies against me and my book is motivated by this. You know, these so-called people, So, a YouTube, Reddit, self-protective rationalization machines, these genetic dead ends coming face to face with something that makes their mental contortions impossible. And I mean think of the average Brooklyn striver, or even on our side, the self-styled influencer

or pundit or a Latino or similar intelligentsia striver who wants to write column, be respected as a thinker, important thinker, right? So now their mindset is basically, this is their mindset that through democratic socialism has never been tried because the CIA and the Dole Fruit Company or this use dirty tricks to keep the Williamsburg philosophy and political economy major down and to keep the things man down. You know, this is their mindset. You know, when someone with that kind of mind confronted with my book, somebody with that kind of domestic housebroken low IQ ultimately mind confronted with my book or whatever they They usually hear secondhand about my book because they never really read me.

But with what they hear or with the attention I get from frogs that they think should be their deal. So I was sent by the Rockefellers to deprive, for example, obese nerds and Latin salt of the earth working class men and Brooklyn intelligentsia, I was sent to deprive them of the leadership of the Alt-Rights. So all of their bile comes out now. And it is good to see, I say, my friends drag these wastes of life and to defend it. But why I went on this tangent about Reddit men? It was not just to describe who is my typical enemy, but to get into the next topic, which is whether the current state of things politically in America and Europe, whether the current political form or regime call it what you will, whether it will endure, how long it has, how long a time will endure.

It's a question that had concerned me for some time. In fact, I wanted to talk about on last show, but it gets too long, so I will talk on next segments because the type of creativity I just mentioned, right, this kind of a mule on whose back the present state continues. When such people get jobs later with newspapers, they write about how I'm a fascist and a Russian spy. Some others are doing this, the ones with jobs. When they get federal jobs, they use them to target the Americaner, who they have to see as a vehicle for WASP or white supremacy or for the Roosevelt and Rockefellers and this to justify the kulak, right? When they get neither type of position, they become a schlub genetic dead end, as most

of them already are, and this class, the miseducated intelligentsia, the miseducated urban intelligentsia genetic dead end, this is the engine of this filthy regime. So the question comes, can they be convinced maybe? Can they be reformed? Can they be maybe bullied or cajoled eventually into being different, into supporting different things? Or if not, how much resistance can such people truly, in the end, present to a determined power of our own or of somebody else's own? How long can, in any case, can the current regime limp on when its spirit is just this, the Reddit being? Not the sheep, not the herd even, but the cylinderette in the carnival procession of historical human types. I ask this, I will be right back. Yes, welcome back to show.

There is an example in Herodotus that show why idea of American empire is so absurd at this point. Why is the days of this dumb regime, its days are at an end, I believe. I will read for you in a second, but if you remember my last show, I suppose last show was an Asperger's level forum debate on sports and race, HPD. Maybe this was my most ignorant show, but I find that kind of thing very interesting and the relevance for future of America is that the state cannot square this problem of black stasis. The ancient word for what's going on is stasis. You take any ancient thinker, whether Aristotle or middle of the road ancient thinker, would call the condition of a black population in America today one of stasis, which is to say

a revolt, black revolt, for decades at least, this condition is neither ideologically nor practically continuable. Ideologically, it's because since blacks as a group are unequal in achievement of all kinds, in economic situation, incarceration rates and this, there are only two possible explanations. Either these are organic result of group differences in ability and behavior that are inborn or or that are so culturally path-dependent that they might as well be inborn, or otherwise it's a result of white supremacy and privilege and oppression. And whichever path you go on, America as you've known it since 1950 is impossible. And it would have been better not to allow this question to assume such political importance, but now that they allow this, this mistake has already been made.

You can't change it. You cannot go back to the polite silence on this topic, which in a country like America America after 1950, it would have been so necessary if they had wanted it to continue. In a multiracial or multinational empire, you cannot let these questions become dominant. If you do, it's over. America made this mistake because its ruling class was stupid, that all there is to it. They wanted an empire, but they acted without discretion. An empire, you need discretion. You need to know some kind of de facto segregation that's not called segregation, and you look the other way, and you don't formalize it, you don't bring it to consciousness. In other words, historical empires kept peoples separate, and mostly this was because there

was no technology really to mix populations and living situations on a large scale. So you might have a large empire that ruled many peoples, but the peoples continued to live separately, maintain their separate customs and geographical distribution, and they did We did mix only in the capital city or in the capital, plus a few great cities, so it was not a huge problem. And you need to have a kind of free and easy way in an empire not to force mixing, and I'm not talking just about miscegenation, but I mean not to force living together. And especially not to allow invidious questions of why is this ethnic group doing much better than this other ethnic group, not to allow this to become extremely prominent question

in political discourse, not to try to change people's customs also and to force yourself on them in matters of language, customs, religion and so forth. Now you remember the Herodotus episode, it is so vivid, I may have read it to you before, I don't remember, but I will read you the famous Herodotus episode about how custom is king. Custom is king. I hold that Zen in every way proved that Cambyses was quite insane, or he would have never set himself to deride religion and custom. For if it were proposed to all nations to choose which seemed best of all customs, each after examination would place its own first. So well is each convinced that its own are by far the best. It is not therefore to be supposed that any one except a madman would turn such things to ridicule.

I will give this one proof among many from which it may be inferred that all men hold this belief about their customs. When Darius was king of the Persians, he summons the Greeks who were with him in the The Persian Empire asked them for what price they would eat their father's dead bodies. They answered that there was no price for which they would do it. Then Darius summoned those Indians who are called the Kalatii and who eat their parents and asked them who eat their dead parents as a funerary rite, he means, and he asked them, the Greeks being present and understanding through interpreters what was said, what would make them willing to burn their fathers at death. This is the ancient Greek custom. The Indians cried aloud that he should not speak of so horrid an act.

So firmly rooted are these beliefs. And it is, I think, rightly said in Pindar's poem that custom is the king of all, the lord of all. Yes, isn't that amazing, isn't that a great line, a great paragraph. Now think about it. What did the Persian king do? Will he let them all keep their customs? He even respected them, the supposedly, what you know from movies as the evil, cruel, oriental despots like this. They would not only let people keep their own ways, they would not forcefully mix them together unless they presented real problems, so forth, but they would even go to particular domains within their empire, they would visit this tribe and that tribe to honor them, to sacrifice in their temple, to pay respect to their customs and gods. And that's what you have to do to have empire.

And then yes, occasionally you would chimp out and wipe someone out if they really made themselves a pain, but the Romans, they did this last to the Jews, they basically destroyed the Jews' territory and so forth because of the repeated, really violent revolutions in which Jews massacred Roman citizens, they massacred Greeks in really huge numbers. If you look at what Gibbon says about the Jewish Second Revolt, I think it was really a genocidal revolt that was so horrible, so you cannot blame the Romans for then reacting against that when they say enough is enough, so they treat the Jews and a few other problem peoples this way. But until that point, the Romans had given Jews many privileges in the empire and freedoms

as a people, they never interfered in religion and customs and so forth, even when they held them in contempt, they did this for all peoples they ruled. Because again, you have to respect differences, right? Haha, yes, when you are empire, you have to do this. But in this real way, not in the American fake empire way where you pay lip service and then you impose a tranny dildo parade up your ass in Kiev and Belgrade and are unable to enforce it so that I think in Belgrade it was shut down. So you look both capricious and arrogant and weak. You know, in Suetonius, the Roman writer, The Lives of the Twelve Caesars, you should all read this, but he described dysfunctional and mad Roman emperors in this book.

But in the beginning of the biography of each emperor, he's describing the good things they did. And at one point, when he's saying good things about this particular one, I forget the exact circumstances, but he's talking about a Roman official. It may have been Tiberius. He was visiting Judea and refusing to offer sacrifice in the temple of the Jews. He talked about how Augustus praised him for refusing this because these people had repulsive customs and it's said in this very offhand way that's very offensive. Augustus praised him, yes, he did well not to sacrifice in the Jewish temple. But the point is, Suetonius feels the need to make this aside because it was so unusual. In other words, high Roman officials, including the emperor, regularly made the rounds around

various domains of empire to show respect to subject peoples and to their traditions and to leave them be in their own ways, to not force them to not force their ways. Now what does America do? Now think about the Herodotus passage I just read to you. America would make both the Greek and the Indian custom illegal in some way or mock or an imposed gay dildo funeral or lesbian dildo marriage or tranny financial system and the American Occupational class that has hijacked the American Empire. They have no idea how much this is hurting them how much the abuse also of America's financial power Right is destroying its reputation. America is enormous financial power Obviously all over the world other countries want to respect this but American so-called ruling class abuses

You think, for example, Switzerland and all these other countries, I mean, forget about abusing the status of the reserve currency of the dollar and so forth. That is well known. Peter Schiff talked about that. Many others do. But you think these countries want to abide by a law, for example, like FATCA, and then to be threatened with being cut off from the U.S. financial markets if they don't do this, they don't do that, they don't abide by these financial document regulations and so on, if they don't homogenize financial practices, which are of course a big part of a nation's customs and this. But this is just some among many examples of how America tries to destroy traditional custom rather than respect them, which it has for a long time in European colonies around the world.

It did this in Vietnam when it deposed Vietnamese emperor. But nothing is more toxic than gay, tranny, universalism things that America imposes now. Universal sodomy promotion. This America huge mistake, universal homogenization. This is not how you run empire. Real empires like Russia, yes, Russia, Rome, Persia, Russia, I said this on Twitter, some people misunderstood, I said it to sort of make a jab, to jab the stiletto that Russia would actually have an easier time assimilating and pacifying a black population, not because it would use force, but because they have more experience managing minorities and making them loyal than America does. America is actually very bad at that. But again, real empires, Rome, Russia, Persia, these are both more permissive and more cruel

than America, but in different directions, it just has to be a totally different orientation. In any case, I have more to say on this and how America really ruined the appeal that it had for the entire world at the end of the Cold War, and maybe it was an unjust appeal. Maybe it shouldn't have had that appeal, but it did, and it squandered it all. It ruined it. I'll be right back to explain some of this. America made both mistakes. It both let internal question of race arise, which you can never do in multiracial state, to start asking why is this race doing better, why worse, why in prison. And second mistake, not unrelated, it may mistake pursuing program of homogenization both at home and abroad, to get rid of the wisdom of localism.

And so then what now, practically you cannot solve black problem in any decent way because the level of racial hatred and mobilization has been raised to such a pitch that you know You know, you have creatures like Michel Goldberg in New York Times, National Paper of Record, and actually many others mainstream now who engage in openly racial exterminationist rhetoric, Hutu rhetoric in Rwanda in the 90s. You cannot come back from that. So when I say that this form of government is on its last legs, I don't mean to encourage complacency because, as I may have said before, I think things will get very dark in the next few years is not something I endorse, but to tell you, I just think America is about where Yugoslavia was in 1988 or 1989 or so, except the conflict will be much worse in

America because the hatred between not so much ethnic groups, although some of that too, but the ideological mobilization that leads to the ethnic hatred is so great. And the future will be maybe like a huge Bosnia, unfortunately. But what can you learn from end of East Bloc communism with respect to possible end of American neo-communism, which I think is a better word for the system that exists than neo-liberalism. Neo-liberalism is just communism with a liberal face. But I listened to Mike Anton and Mollbug debate this a little bit on, I think, Jack Murphy show. And Mollbug was wondering how East Bloc communism fell and making comparison to America today. And he make points that America elite today has a relatively high degree of inner solidarity, which I think is true.

It was indeed proven by their reaction to Trump. And for him, for Muhlbach, this is biggest maybe sign of their ability to endure a while longer, as well as the sincerity in their beliefs, these notions that most of us and maybe most Americans find so repugnant. So not just the extreme woke white privilege version, but maybe even the less explicit or crazy version of leftist thought before 2016, or I'd say before 2012 as well, which was about as bad. And he's saying that what I've just called Reddit men, that this Reddit men is ubiquitous and numerous and sincere. I think he numbers it at something like 10 to 20 percent. I think it's a great overestimation. He gets order of battle, in other words, wrong. Look up what order of battle means.

He make point that American elites unlike for example Polish or Czech in the 1980s that they believe in this with some sincerity And similarly he made maybe I should invite him on show So we discussed this and some other matters if he wants to come but he made interesting point about the love of American fashions in East Europe or for bell bottoms and coca-cola many such thing even in the 1970s Proving of where the wind was blowing in other word and for mold bug as well as for a new reactionaries, they believe these cultural and fashion matters and so forth are downwind of power. And so it was the feelings of power and therefore the future lay with the West that maybe inspired this fashion and other cultural trends in East Bloc, drinking Coke and so forth, was

to the neo-reactionaries a sign that you can say of movement in that direction toward the West. Well, okay, I will not restate all of his points, but only those of interest to me that that I care to contest, you should watch the interview he had with Mike Anton, very interesting. It got a lot of normy attention too, you know, about American Caesar, whether it be an American Caesar. But I just want to wonder myself what it was that led to this quite fast regime change in East Bloc in 1989 to 1991 in Russia, so forth, that when it happened, it was swift and mostly bloodless, and certainly in a place like Czech or this, which is also, other point that when regime change comes in such situation as he thinks America, it is in one move.

And I think, however, this is wishful thinking because, again, the model is not East Bloc, it is Yugoslavia. That is a more appropriate model for America. But I remember, look, I remember East Bloc life. I will not get too intellectual about this subject. I will tell you what I remember and what people felt. Why did we like America? My parents told me such and such food was American when I did not want to eat something. You know, I was finicky eaters, they wanted to get me to eat something, they said, eat this, it's American. Even though it was not. To try to convince me, this is how children in other words were convinced to eat or to do something, you know, we looked up to America and the reason we look up to America was not

because we were entranced by America power, whatever this is, but because we hated our government and really its filthy and self-righteous lives and I mean I was a small boy but I remember that part quite well the opponent the opponent was everywhere is secret and everywhere I was told the walls had ears and always in school in school you were in danger of being monitored in some way and something you said could reflect on your parents get them in trouble but in retrospect it was much freer than America right now because surveillance technology and this it was not as developed and secondly because of broad agreement in society that government was run by a bunch of vicious and unspeakably corrupt people with a moribund ideology and so there was a lot of anti-authority solidarity and in

private you could express a variety of opinions without being ostracized socially and so forth. So where I grew up you could play prank on teacher and no one would ever tell on you But I was shocked when I moved to America and find that children regularly told, kids told on each other to the teacher and a prank on authority, if you threw a spitball at teachers they told on you. And this was unthinkable in East Bloc. On the other hand, the teacher had respect in America, it was unthinkable that you should play a prank on him. It was very strange to me. But I think in large part this is not because of American belief in the principles of leftist of leftism or the leftist state idea however, but in the good solid Protestant stock assumptions

that all authority is good and all authority must be obeyed because it is authority that rules must be obeyed and this quality of lawfulness that is the cause of much good and much bad in northwest Europe, the northern conformism in other words that Nietzsche derives in his aphorism on Genoa from the Gay Science. I will not read it now, I think I did before, but look it up, it's beautiful. And in any case, I remember when I was a small boy with communism regime, I did not hate actually the situation. I enjoyed it greatly, the subterfuge, the ubiquitous presence of the enemy in this fight. It was great fun for a boy, and I loved even then secrets and plotting and pranks in this, but the point is the government was

much hated, and America was seen as an alternative, not of power, which, you know, it's somewhat hard to think what power means, it's very abstract, but I mean when Chinese men swim with danger to his life, from Mainland to Hong Kong in 1982, or someone cross Berlin Wall, is he trying to get to power, or is he trying to get away from the corrupt, unrelenting drabness of communist life? That's stultifying, that openly presents you with no real future. So because as a boy I did not see much of the worst of it, for me it was mostly fun. But as a grown man you had to deal with constant humiliations at the hands of cashiers essentially, of cashier bureaucrats and such. You have to get forms stamped and this to get everything done, you have to prostrate

yourself to a second or third city bureaucrat, okay? Often this was an annoying middle-aged woman who took pleasure in causing you pain. Does this sound familiar? Is it already in America? So anyway, so you do anything, right, to get away from this empowered HR cunt. So why the West? Because of its promise of freedom and prosperity. Freedom and prosperity, this was hope that America held to the unfree world, and it is hard to describe, but it's both of these together that appeared as an image of hope for so many in East Bloc. Freedom and prosperity, hard to distinguish between the two in at least mind of the time. Somehow the communist states never managed to deliver on their promise for equality, but the West seemed comparatively to have delivered on freedom and prosperity embodied

in American movies and architecture and the life of characters played by men like Robert Redford or whoever, at least this was what was advertised, you could say, by Harley Weird. But it was also a thing you heard from people who had already left, who were no longer an East Bloc, who lived in the West. And I've heard it said by some that it's the prosperity that now attracts many third-world immigrants, this more recent, whereas it was the freedom part that attracted both East Bloc immigrants as well as those who sought to reform their own societies along Western lines. But I mean to say it's hard to separate the two, freedom and prosperity. They were assumed to be a package in some intuitive way. Now I will be accused by people with Asperger's of supporting Libertardianism and this.

I don't like Libertardianism. I'm trying to tell you what people in that place at the time believed, and I believe actually Libertardianism is an insufficient and stupid abstract formalization of this feeling for freedom and prosperity, just because Cato Institute misunderstands it as giving Monsanto power to steal farms or letting Twitter shut down free speech, allowing American big tech companies, allowing the state, it's not big tech companies actually, it's the state through NGOs and through big tech companies to shut down free speech and eventually to to shut people's ability to rent a hotel or to shut down their fridge, nobody in East Bloc would have understood that as America promise, Cato Institute does. It is a stupid and corrupt formalization of ideal freedom.

So just because Cato misunderstands it this way does not mean that you have to then reject freedom and promise, excuse me, freedom and prosperity, because these still remain as a kind of shining idea for many people around the world. If you do reject them, you have to come up with some alternative, which I will get to in a moment. Now, I do have a kind of alternative, but it will only ever be attractive to very much minority. In any case, I don't want this segment to be about me. I just want to tell you what happened with East Bloc regime change and what's happening now in United States. But I can tell you what never played any part in it in this East Bloc admiration for America. What never played any part was principles or the Constitution or notions of justice

or institutions or any of these other things that are the favorite objects of theorizing for so-called political theorists and so forth or for their mimics in the press and government. They played no part at all. I can tell you nobody cared. It was the American people and its way of life, again, that embodied in particular characters and personages and things people heard, whether historical or artistic and support, that carried a lot more weight. The only weight, actually. It's another huge miscalculation of the American managerial class, or as I call them, the occupational class. It is huge mistake on their part, if they want empire, to attack its ethnic or American core, the white Americaner, because it is this type and his way of life that was, and

I would say still is, primary attractor for a foreigner. It is not the so-called institutions or the, I was going to say the corporations, but things like the post office or words written on paper of the constitutions. It's not the ideas of words, which after all, even a child knows that words are meaningless and can be manipulated by whoever. This is something you learn very fast in corrupt, decaying, cobby state, or right now I imagine in third-world cryptocracies they know this very well also, the mendacity of words and of speech as such, the uselessness of basing life on so-called principles. What is principle to this hypocritical, lying monkey mankind, and most of all to the modern mass men? But there is another reason it was not the American Constitution or such that was the

primary point of attraction. And this next what I'm going to say, many commentators, including I think Maud Bug, who is much better than the other people who comment on this, but nearly all others, they forget this fact about the East Blocs, that a lot of these countries had a liberal history before the commies, okay? And we all actually knew about it. I knew about it even as a small boy. My nanny, a very nice nanny, but she had been a monarchist, she was a monarchist, and she taught me many things, and after communism fell, she was, I think, the head of the AARP, like the Retired People Organization, but the monarchist version of that. So what I'm saying is, after communism fell, the pre-war party patterns, they often easily reasserted themselves in all these East Bloc countries.

There are studies on this, you can see how pre-1940s parliamentary voting patterns re-established themselves after 1989, 1990, that liberal parliamentary democracy identity was never really forgotten. Neither was it, by the way, in Japan or Germany in 1945, which is another reason why it was insane to use these countries as examples for why democracy would take hold in Iraq or the Middle East. You know, neo-Khan's crisis, they say, oh, if we could do it in Japan or Germany, we can do it in Iraq. Japan or Germany had strong liberal, so-called, not that I approve of it, but just as a historical matter, they had strong liberal parliamentary traditions in, let's say, 1900, 1910, that it was easy to re-establish, whereas the Middle East has never known such things.

In other words, there was in Eastern Bloc already an inner, older alternative that could be re-established easily, and second, remember that communism was imposed in these countries by force from outside and preserved by Russian force, by Soviet force. It was resented actually even by many native sincere commies also, and in this way a comparison to America today is inappropriate, because it was a foreign explicit occupation phenomenon in Poland and Czech and so forth, and they repeatedly rebelled against Russian imposition, especially the Catholic countries, Hungary 1956, Czech 1968, Yugoslavia of course was never really controlled by Soviet and never really communized completely. And if you want to ask the question of why East Bloc communism fell, well, the proximate

political cause, you see in 1968, the Soviet Presidio, this was the oligarchic bureau running Soviet Union, decided, OK, from here on out, after this latest Czech revolt, we will no longer militarily intervene in East Europe. Now, they did not obviously openly advertise that. And from that time, it still took about 20 years for regime to end in East Europe. But the reforms in that time were gradually enacted until, for example, in Poland, you had Lech Walesa in early 1980s. He led a civil disobedience mass uprising, complete with strikes. He was the leader of a solidarity resistance labor movement, which was these kinds of methods, mass strikes, mass civil disobedience. He stood up to copy state and ended it and Soviet Union did not send troops to stop it

and Czech took other paths, Czech Republic, Czechoslovakia took other paths and I mean to the end of communism and so forth. And in all these cases it was resistance in part to a perceived foreign imposition and also involves the establishment of forms that had existed before. So the old people remembered again quite well the parliamentary life and so forth from before communism. Why do I say all this? Because aside from the Lech Walesa example, which is actually what I think America needs right now to get out of this, that type of mass civil disobedience movement, which needs a leader to coordinate it, inevitably of the stature of somebody like Trump or Flynn, nobody else really. You need somebody of that national prominence to lead it, and they, for whatever reason,

they are out of commission, they've been neutralized. I think they're extorted, okay that's for another time, but the situation I mean to America is not really analogous because nobody feels really American woke leftism or leftist regime in general has been imposed by a foreign occupation army or that it is preserved by the threat of invasion. So I think then it's much harder for American regime to end in that smooth way because there's no consensus of what it should go back to or if it should go back to anything at all. There's only a feeling on all sides right now that the current situation is intolerable, which is why you know it will change and change soon for better or worse. But unlike East Bloc, where most citizens look hopefully to the freedom and prosperity

of the West and to their own relatively recent past, the pre-communist liberal past as guides for the future, America does not have an attractive alternative vividly as possible in front of it. Almost no American normal conservative would dare to say that the America of 1950s or even 1960s is something that should be gone back to. So what it has is, it's instead a feeling of exhaustion, right? That's what a feeling that this cannot go on, that's what it is, right? It's called exhaustion of some kind. And this is what I also see when look America intellectual political life now, which is is claims on both the right, but especially the far left, that some kind of new order, that a new religion, a new Soviet Union is about to start. I don't even laugh at it.

It feels just like something you sigh at and you look away. Really you will try to set up this hokey replay of this other state that fell apart from its own inner decrepitude, driven by an ideology Marxism that is basically a role-playing identity in America today. So I'm not saying this because I'm complacent or want you to be complacent about the left, please understand, but you must know what is coming and what is not. In America today, there is ideological exhaustion on all sides, and these fake election year performative convulsions, notwithstanding, it is just an exhausted regime, and what remains after the end of ideology is ethnic solidarity. And that is the near future of America, I'm afraid, to repeat, Bosnia.

There is Tom Wolfe's book, Back to Blood is not his best, but he realizes America now, in time of the collapse of its ideals with no really attractive alternative, what happened is what happened to Libya after Gaddafi. Old tribal allegiances reasserted themselves very easily, and in truth, this has been story of America for the last few decades anyway, at least since end of Cold War. It's a process of de-assimilation of marginal white groups, that's where it's most visible. So for example, Jews, they more strongly identify with Jewishness than with white Americanness. They go back to the shtetl mythology and the golem and this. But increasingly also other racially marginal cases. This is what Saylor calls the flight from white, and I would say this is only in very

small part motivated by financial and legal incentives, and more so by the exhaustion of the American ideologies on all sides, the return to tribalism or ethnic identity as a way to orient yourself in a confusion of ideological collapse. And if you look at a rhetoric of the left, you see this other peculiarity at first seemed unrelated but is related. For example, when communists, right, communists realized the promise of freedom and of liberty was so strong that communists in East Bloc, in Soviet Union, had to recast their claims for equality in the language of freedom. And the left right now abandons freedom for the language of safety. And you saw this especially now in the last year with medical nurse state tyranny of course.

But it's behind, for example, the micro-aggression thing for more than ten years now. It's behind trigger warnings. It's behind this also Olympics mental illness thing. You have to be safe. It's important to keep safe. Safety committee. Keep safe. This is their alternative. And in this context, freedom and freedom of speech that causes discomfort is violence to them. This is their position, this is their alternative, safety, the regime of safety. But I strong doubt that the promise of safety, in other words, the nursing home world, that I doubt this is ultimately that attractive future alternative. Maybe I overestimate the bug man. But even this breed of creature, at once hysterical and anemic, I doubt how long even they can tolerate the safety promise.

I don't know, but the Reddit man I mentioned in the previous segment who makes this pathetic alternative of the safe society run, it runs on the back of the Reddit man, he's not ultimately that numerous, I think. I do not think he's really over 2 or 3% of population, if that, he's just given outside influence because of closeness to state organs, which is dangerous, because, okay, the left is dangerous. I think they will try to kill millions of people in the next 10 years or so, in part motivated by this ideology of safety. There will be a war. I don't want it, but there is no doubt they will take things in that direction, again with this bizarre, violent vision of safety, which is tyranny. But I see so many red-blooded Americans of various political bands, not just the powerless

let's say, MAGA and Q-Americaner, but many, many Americans of all bent of life who are just so tired of doctrine of safety. I meet expats abroad, apolitical people, men of the left who go surfing. They read my book, gamers read my book. Why? Because it is a statement against this nanny, longhouse, nursing home mentality. It's so stultifying. Many in the elite and also close to the elite are sick of this already after a year or two of knowing the so-called promise of safety, they can't take it any longer. So I just don't think this tyrannical safety society is a compelling vision for future that can mobilize large number of people or even elite that can rival previous promises even of liberty or prosperity. What is the image of life associated with this idea of safety?

What is it embodied in? Who would want to live there? Look, I'm not even talking about me or my friends or adventurous men or this, but they have no embodied image or future or promise associated with this criticism of freedom. And I will close this show to suggest that this slogan of safety, in the name of which both freedom and prosperity are to be sacrificed, fundamentally it's accepted to a degree that it's accepted at all outside of the Reddit man rationalization bubble, which again is quite small, but if at all it is accepted by any normal people outside of this, it is because of ethnic fracture. And how many people have, again in the wake of collapse of ideology, and the collapse of actually ability to build wealth in America, America no longer really offer prosperity

for a mass amount of people like it used to, but people have reverted them to ethnic identification for protection and in a fractured ethnic situation where both resources and honours are expected to be apportioned according to ethnic spoils system, the previous situation of economic liberty or prosperity and of freedom, especially freedom of speech, these are felt to be immediate threats. So because we live in such anemic and passive-aggressive time, this incongruity is recast, I think, in language of safety. if it were Yugoslavia in 1988 or 89, which it is, but a Yugoslavia where you have a dumb therapeutic woman-led culture, therapeutic culture, where they are not allowed to openly discuss ethnic divisions and ethnic demands that then could be hashed out, where they

have to pay lip service and maybe even mind service to formal ideas of equality and harmony. So whenever the nasty new reality comes to the surface, which it necessarily very often, but then you're accused of upsetting sensitivities, mental health, trigger, and this. So it sounds cute, but it's not even Band-Aid, right, and the reversion to ethnic identity does not stop, and neither does ethnic hatred and competition, and so I believe the future of America, the alternative, again is actually Yugoslavia in the 1990s, but it will take America a little bit longer to realize that secession and separation is a solution. So I think until then it will get very ugly, which is why, for practical reason, I supported

Herr Drumpf, because I thought he and his followers, if he had managed to pull through, but that they might have bought America sometime a decade, a decade and a half, but in particular bought us sometime, me and my frog friends and the listeners of this show, sometime to to prepare, and to decide whether we should stay and take part in the coming festivities in America, or to depart on a new Argonauts expedition or expeditions, and to search for fortune in other parts of the world, to search for our own Atlantis as the imposed international fake peace wings and opportunities begin once again to surface as Leviathan falters. I hope maybe more for this, to consider leaving gloomy conflicts, to consider founding new monasteries of military vitality in the tropics with friends.

Until next time, bye!