Sorry, Kamala, sorry, human resources can't USA regime. The Aryan warriors of God in Afghanistan just kick your sissy asses out the door. That's right. The Nuristani, blonde and red bearded Aryan men, the Aryan in Afghanistan and Persia has stood up, has taken a stand against the Anglo-Leventine Congoid is not an empire, it poses as an empire, commercial conglomerate posing as an empire in 20 years, a trillion dollars, and USA Cabool Embassy June 2 look up a gay flag, yes please look it, there is a post from the United States Cabool Embassy, they put a gay flag to celebrate gay month in June 2 publicly, all of this come to nothing now, in about one week, all the work for two decades is reversed, the work of a generation because you are weak and gay whereas the Pashtun under

the proud leadership of Kalash converts these are men of blonde and tony beards like Indra himself they win they win once again over the Dasyu Kamala and yes she is the face of the human resources cunt establishment that has taken over many of these old American institutions after the Cold War ended you know so It's basically women who either like her or like Hillary hoard themselves out for career advancement and it doesn't matter if Hillary is married to mama's boy Bill Clinton. It is still prostitution. It's prostitution masquerading as a traditional marriage and second, it is sucker moms, like for example the CIA Kabul station chief sucker mom who got everyone killed because she was a naive idiot. She trusted her Afghan source, who ended up being al-Qaeda.

I forget the exact year this happened, but this is a true event. It is depicted in a movie, I think, Zero Dark Thirty. I forget, again, there are so many movies about this, but this is a real event. And this source, who she trusted, promised them some kind of high-value target meeting or information. Again, I forget the details. It doesn't matter. The point is this sucker mom, given rule of a CIA station in Afghanistan, she gathered together all the Nabaab CIA geniuses, the ones that Chomsky left believe are running the world since 1950. She gathered them for some kind of meeting with a source, right, who ended up getting them all killed. He was sent suicide bombers and they all died, and that source she was using, by the way, had been feeding this woman targets for two years.

So you know, the CIA, American military with information given by the station chief, was basically doing Taliban and Al Qaeda work. In that instance alone, for two years, and probably many more that we don't know about, America was killing its own friends and killing Al Qaeda's enemies in Afghanistan. And this is a long-running problem in American so-called imperialism, which is really anti-imperialism because you cannot have yokel women raised on moral homilies and wishful thinking and scolding. You know, they should really have Samantha Power write a new tract. She should write a manifesto to be studied at major universities. She should call it Strategy as Scolding, the millennial tradition of women in statecraft

or something like this, where they could have Samantha Power and Victoria Nuland and Psaki take a break from what they should be doing all the time, which is practicing their brisket. This is not my joke. Michael Savage makes this, but I steal it. But they should be wagging their finger at Pashtun goat herds and lecture them on human rights and how building women's schools will actually make Islam stronger. She should write this. It would be very successful. My Ignatiev could, they could have symposium debate on this and major universe, but really it's a great week for the free world because remember this debacle is not yours. Their loss is your gain. And as you may know, I keep in touch with many soldiers.

My attack here is not on the American people or the soldiers, both of who have no part in this fight at all. I keep in touch regularly, both with active duty and veterans, and none of them look at this as a loss or embarrassment for themselves, but only for this corrupt, latrine-monger, Khmer whore class that has been placed in positions of responsibility in America because some oligarch or otherwise some senile wasp or senile Jew felt that they would be better and more pliant puppets than people of genuine merit. And this is why America's foreign policy since 1990 is in a downward trend of latrine. And there still remain, by the way, a few, even in relatively high position, men of intelligence and merit, but they are isolated, they are unable to change anything, they cannot coordinate

with each other, they don't know they have outside support, they should probably resign. But the point is, aside from a few Reagan boomers, some of them have become MAGA boomers, but out of ignorance, some of these Reagan boomers, the Ned Flanders type, they still identify with the ups and downs of the American security establishment, whereas no soldier that I know thinks of this as a loss. They've known for a long time. I talk even 10 years ago, I talked to a Marine officer. He is hardly a radical of any kind. He is a man who lives now, a bourgeois life, part of the American elite and so forth. But he was in Afghanistan, he was in shootouts in Afghanistan. So not desk jockey like David French, he was a combat captain in the Marines.

And of course, even at that time, he tell me that nobody among soldiers knew why they were there. know what they were doing there, supporting the Afghan government, this of what they were told. Of course, everyone knew the Afghan government were just a corrupt, rug salesman turd. The kind of man, you go to Egypt market if you are tourist, you go to pyramid in Cairo or this, Cairo market, and my friend, I have ancient scroll for you, passed down to me by my grandfather, it's from the time of pharaohs and this, maybe a black Israelite I believe that. But this is the type America installed, the United States security establishment gave Afghanistan to that corrupt expat Karzai and to other corrupt Afghans who had been in exile and had no popularity whatsoever with any Afghan people.

I'll get to this in a moment. But this guy, a Marine captain, tell me, and he had, again, he was a real fighter, had bullets flying past his head. He would tell me, we would go on these patrols and the Afghan village head will come out to you and say, look, please don't punish me, it's my daughter's wedding but the Taliban were here last week, we had to let them in or they would cut my son's throat, we had to give them hospitality, my daughter is getting married and such and such, they said I had to do it. So you know, they all realize it's hopeless because the patrols meant nothing, you do not control those villages really and no American serving there had any belief in the mission already by 2010, 2009, 2011 or so. There was no mission, it made no sense. And I want to

play for you from Edward Luttwak interview that I also posted on my Twitter account little bit before it was banned. Here is Edward Luttwak speaking. There is the war in Afghanistan, which was based, as you know, of a plan by distinguished generals with PhDs and so on, who basically had this idea, we go to Afghanistan, we build schools, hospitals, roads, highways, power systems, libraries, universities, colleges, and all that, and we'll have turned it into Sweden, and once it's Sweden, they'll have no use for the Taliban. Now, all of this was based on never having stepped foot in Afghanistan. And it's remarkable to persist in it, even when you have thousands of American officers in Afghanistan who can look out the window, or rather no windows, walk in the street and

see what Afghanistan is really like and realize that, yes, you can convert into Sweden, but you'll need 400 years and you have to kill three quarters of the males in Afghanistan, probably in three generations, one after the other, to be able to do it, as well as dis-establishing religion, among other things, forbidding Islam, of course, and so on. So how can an intelligent, sophisticated American democracy with universities, study centers and so on, and quite a lot of people who have served in Afghanistan, to embark on such a crazy project, immediately after embarking on another lunatic project, which was making democracy in Iraq, of all places, as if Iraqis have access to democracy in this century or perhaps the next. How is it possible?

Well, one thing is anybody who actually knows anything about Afghanistan gets excluded from the decision process. And you come in, for example, myself, I happen to have visited Afghanistan, and I'm a defense consultant. I actually went to meetings and I would say, you know, this is what it's like in this little, you know, it's very varied, but I know this little villages, they do this and that village do that. You immediately get kicked out of the room. You're a racist because you refuse to accept the fact that by going around and developing the place, you can turn into Sweden. Okay? Obviously, you're a racist. So I got kicked out as a racist. Other people got kicked out for various reasons. In fact, we had the contingent of State Department

officials, who over the years had served in the embassy in Kabul, none of them took part in the decision. So that is how you can succeed in being autistic, even though you have the University of California at Berkeley, which has lots of expertise, and I'm told, a few other universities in America. You can still make these huge mistakes. Okay, so you see, isn't that nice? No serious country can survive internationally acting like that. America is blessed by two oceans, which unfortunately lets the security state Marans act this way and they never face any consequences, or so they think. But it's very simple, you see. So the American people did not care. The soldiers were against being used as Russian roulette fodder for Samantha Power and Obama's

and Bush's fantasies of nation-building in that shithole. And so you should rejoice because it's a great rebuke to all the humanitarian, and therefore you know humanitarian, when put into practice, means unintentionally cruel beliefs of the occupational class. This is a great week to see their humiliation. What humiliation it is, Jennifer Psaki, that constipated gay man, you know, it's the same kind of weird guy. She has a kind of weird guy who tried to sell you a suit at the department store, same energy with very pale and very strange energy come from Jen Psaki, some kind of trainee or its official White House spokesmouth. So she's there begging the Taliban not to take Kabul because it's not nice. Can you believe this? Asking them not to please spare us, please spare us the Tali Chads.

And probably by the time you hear this show, the takeover of Kabul will be complete. So she's wagging her fingers, scolding them. What will the international community do? This isn't what responsible people do who want international legitimacy and this. The same Reddit brigades, they're horrible human beings. Just keep calling the Taliban that, they will not piss you in your mouth then, they will not rape you into their bacha-bazi. And then some journalist, a fake journalist ex-spook, and as you know there is a revolving door now between these insurance agency hostess types who work in the security state and the sinecures and CNN and New York Times. They get them and they move back and forth between apparently what is the state-owned

media and positions in the national security establishment. And they do this after spreading Trump is a Russian mafia agent for four years. That's when it really started out. And she opened this revolving door between intelligence agencies, if you can call them that, and the legacy media. So this type, you know, she is on Twitter saying, do not post fall of Saigon-like images. I'm quoting from what she posted now because it may trigger people. We may have a simian bile moment of fragile mental health. We may have to quit. Please don't, please don't microagress us by showing us mean, tali chad men burning the embassy and this sodomizing American ambassador, I don't know, but really begging you to not remind them that they are idiots, begging you, don't remind them they are not actually

experts in anything but fashionable humanitarian UN moral in, don't remind and don't tell people these are incompetent idiots who cannot be trusted with anything, especially in this time when trusty experts in science, who got everything wrong on Wuhan flu, whose solution to this nursing home disease, for example, is to put a mask on a six-year-old on a sunny beach, to play out BDSM medical, you know, nurse BDSM fantasies, Dr. Fauci, oh, Dr. Fauci, such a looker, don't insert, Dr. Fauci, your limp rigatoni, please leave the cannoli, Mr. Fauci. this Expert, but what was I I was going to talk of roast ears and their delusions about men on this show But I will leave that for the next time or the one after because this show and maybe the next I want to talk

Subset of this idea, which is the inability of this feminized elite this unicoids castrati of the spirit Whether they're born male or female to talk their inability to face a reality of nature in war, to face a reality of men. And the Afghanistan disaster, which is really for us a victory because it shows how weak the designs of this bunch are against the hard resilience of nature. And it is going to be that way for them in every country, including America, their designs will come to nothing. They will not last. But this disaster for them, the Afghanistan, is the topic of this show. It's something you could foresee from as early as 2003, at the latest, and I will be right back to talk this in some detail. Welcome.

So this Caribbean Rhythms, episode 84, and I ask you why America failed in Afghanistan, and the proximate cause is, of course, morale. But to understand the word morale, you have to distinguish between different types of war. And I will have a friend probably on next show to discuss a great theorist of war, Clausewitz. And there is a kind of war you can call absolute war or pure war. For example, war for national survival, total war for existential purpose, national survival. In this case, you could maybe contemplate something like extermination of the enemy, Meaning extermination of his fighting ability physically. The annihilation of the men, such as, for example, ancient Greek city. When it conquered another city, it was customary right of the winner to kill all the men and

to sell the women and children into slavery. Now this was not a right that was always acted on and Greeks themselves, they had ambivalent feelings about this right, but it was nevertheless a right they had and sometimes they took, They acted on it, Athens does this. In the famous case of Melos, you might know this from Thucydides, everyone reads Melian dialogue, you should read it if you haven't, but also they did this almost in case of Mytilene, which is a city on the island of Lesbos that tried to revolt against Athenian rule. It failed, and then Athens held a vote, should we genocide them in this way, kill the men and sell women and children in slavery. And that's a kind of movie exciting episode where first they voted to exterminate the

Mytilinians and then they changed their minds so they had to quickly reverse the order. Very exciting. But in this kind of war, you could maybe contemplate that winning means really annihilating the physical ability of the opponent to fight. But there's an asterisk. Even in these cases, if you take a step back, you see that first the enemy actually surrenders and hopes for mercy. I mean, that happens even in wars of annihilation. It doesn't happen that you just kill all of them in the act of war. So I'm saying even in these cases, it's not something determined purely by a physical or mechanical action, but, and why I give you this preface, such cases are actually rare in warfare, especially, let's say, in Europe after 1600s, after the Thirty Years

War, where certain customary rules were put into place to prevent these type of so-called genocidal actions. And civilians were mostly spared from conflicts, that you could even travel to a country that your government was formally at war with, and there was no problem. But in general, these conflicts are rare and where it's not an absolute war of this type, and where on the other hand the aims are limited, then the political element become more and more important in determining the outcome, which is to say the will of the parties involved and the issues that come with whether you can break your enemy's will to keep fighting. Which sounds very harsh, right, the words like will and break the will.

But of course it's less harsh than the calculations that take place in absolute war, and in practice this process of breaking enemy will does not involve, you know, overt, dominated by dog type scenario and locker room shower, but it's more along the lines of maybe you can even give them an inducement that would make them stop fighting, maybe you can convince them in a number of other ways, alliances, maybe other things too, can you convince them Maybe that the prospects of victory are too dim for the potential cost or even more than this Can you make them realize that what they are fighting for is not worthwhile for them that they don't really want it It's not worth the struggle and so forth which can be done

By specially targeted force you can achieve what what I just said now by specially intelligently targeted force combined with caret of various implicit inducements and is this type of faraway colonial wars that America runs now which isn't really a war like I keep saying but it's kind of half-hearted political action where the masses are not involved passionately in the matter of winning or losing and in that case the political element the political as opposed to the pure material force part of the war the will part it becomes all-important again to the extent that your national community and the people are not invested in it, are not invested in it, in that case you could have overwhelming physical superiority and it would not make a difference as you see in this case.

Here the Taliban strategy was simple and it worked well, which is wait a generation, twenty years, right? That is a generation and the other side, political capital, will dissipate in a generation. It's almost an inevitability that they will leave because they will not have political conditions to maintain will to keep fighting. In other words, think from Taliban point of view. We are fighting in our country to rule our country directly, whereas they are fighting from far away with relatively few men. They have to fight through proxies who fear us more than they fear them. We are motivated by God, we're motivated by love of God and by our religion that sets us on fire, and we become ready to die still after 20 years.

We're also willing to live on non-bread and onion and to stay barefoot on the rocks and to live in a cave to get what we want. And we're willing to wait. They? Well what about them? Now the fact is, I talked to a friend today and he pointed out American soldiers, for example, were extremely motivated. They revved up around 2001 after 9-11. So let's extend that 2001 to 2003, and they were maybe even more motivated than the Taliban at that time, right, because the Taliban were not in a completely free-from-tension relationship with Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda were ugly Arabs and assorted other foreigners, whereas the handsome Pashtun Aryan men, they wanted their own country, and this, I'm not sure how much they were on board with antagonizing the West or America with mega terror attacks.

If you believe the main story about 9-11, I'm saying, whereas at the time, American men of honor, the kind who joined the combat troops from Tennessee foothills and Appalachia and rural New England and so forth, these men, they were supremely motivated. They were set on revenge. And that's great motivation, that's great will, combined with national mobilization, which existed at the time, international goodwill, and a determined political class that can win wars. No, they wanted blood in vengeance for 9-11. They were quite good at drawing this blood wherever they went at the time, excuse me. So this is not to cast aspersion on the American fighting men who performed very well in those conditions, but rather to cast aspersion on the people who misuse their will and their

gallant courage because, okay, you have this will to destroy and to crush the enemy. But instead you tell these men, no, okay, you cannot do that. Instead you have to build school for girls. You have to build a bathhouse for the Pashtun version of Harvey Milk. You have to build hospitals so you can turn Afghanistan into nursing home society like United States. You have to build a job program center so we can have some other debt collector type like Jen Psaki or a dour teacher's aide like Samantha Power, browbeat Afghan men, and Pashtun Taliban. Brough beat them into how flipping burger for McDonald's will make them not want to conquer their nation and oppress women and will make them not want to believe in Allah and all this.

So oh and you cannot fight them when they attack you, you have these rules. So it's a misapplication of the will which is to say the political capital that you have available which is suited for destruction but not for this insane plan that you will turn Afghanistan into Switzerland by building lactation room society and holding their hands. So, this so-called mission, the fake nation building, the hopeless patrols, the subjecting your men to random killing, IED and other attacks, sniping, random betrayals also from Afghan so-called allies, where they were sent there to train, which is something, by the way, even Alexander, I think he experienced this in the area, the treachery of the locals. But of course, it will not take even 20 years to set your men in society of will to keep

fighting in this senseless war, which if you do this, which as you can see again cannot even be called war. So the other side is motivated by national glory, which in their mind always depended on the Afghan mind. Their national pride and glory depends on repelling the latest foreign invader. It's funny actually in Plato Republic, he talk how in his super Sparta type of society, The Republic of Vir, too, he talked about, right? Plato Republic, it's a poor place with warlike rulers, right, so it's poor and warlike. So outsiders see little reason to mess with it, little to gain and much to lose, because the locals are, they have nothing and they're fiercely nationalist and will defend their patch of dirt. There is beautiful line also from Herodotus

about just this happening, the Spartan men, the Spartan leader after Plataea, He's looking at things that they captured from the Persian army, which the retinue of the Persian king had very ornate cookery fairs and all of these ornate dishes and so on. And he said, look men on the folly of the Persian king who has such rich things and comes after us who have such poor things. So this was a very common idea in Greek thought at the time. But for this to happen, you need a people bred and trained for austerity as well as for war. And so I wonder, in this sense, in this limited sense, would Afghanistan be a kind of Plato Republic? I don't know. Ask Martha Nussbaum, why not? But in this sense, at least, because, you know, there is also a myth about Afghan invincibility,

but it's not really true. In other words, both the Russians and the British actually managed to win many times against Afghans. But the fight was difficult enough that, you know, when others see it, when others see you mired down in this fight, even if you're winning, but it's difficult, and they get involved to give you a black eye, right? So they want to help the Afghans who are fighting you. And then the utter poverty and backwardness of the place eventually makes you throw your hands up. What am I fighting for? for donkeys, and this, and what are you fighting over? Is it bachabazi rent boys? Well, yes, this would motivate Podesta, and McConnell, and Andrew Cunanan, and GOP. I don't know, but look, now there is also dope. They grow dope, there is that. But so where was I?

So the Afghans are motivated by this. There is nothing they love more than giving black eye to the latest invader. It's the national pride is over their mud and mountain patch, it rests on this. and they're motivated also by their love of God, their soldiers of God. Well, your side is completely sapped not only by the senselessness of fighting in this wasteland, but in this specific case, the idiocy of the mission, that you maybe liberate Afghan girls or make a safe space for a Paul Singer type to build a Kabul Holocaust Museum or something like this. What American soldier went there to fight for that? I mean, it's a nonsense, right? So that's not what you can use the fierce vengeance bloodlust of the American combat soldier in 2001 for, it's a misapplication.

So this is the inevitable result. You can say maybe that in an absolute physical sense, America did have the means to achieve even total victory and to wipe out the Taliban. But think of it as thought experiment, which is illustrative, what would that have taken? It would have taken a pitched battle, right? So you'd have to invade Waziristan, which is the part of Pakistan where the Taliban were hiding out. It's very mountainous, border region between Pakistan and Afghanistan. You'd have to do a mass invasion of that to do a pitched battle, and that would be very costly. You'd have to be willing to lose tens of thousands of men. That's what it would take, probably also with the use of tactical nukes to destroy mountain and hideouts where Taliban were hiding and so forth.

So am I saying that because I want this to happen? But no, but to show the absurdity of it, right? So that's what it would take. Now think if America would be willing to do this, for what? Tell me what the gain of that huge sacrifice would be. So of course, this kind of absolute war being out of the question, the only other way America could have won this is with extreme cunning, which is to say the limited conflict with no mass national involvement, and no mass pitched battle like that. It is the political wisdom only of your commanders and politicians in that theater that can carry the day. And it would take some very refined art of colonial rule, extreme trickery, to be able to pull off something like that, that maybe not even Britain at its height had,

but at its height had this kind of skill, probably not. But the people America had leading this effort were Jen Psaki and other soccer mom and human resource cunt hostess newters. And I will be right back to talk about some of the especially stupid political mistakes America made really from beginning of being there. It made any kind of victory impossible, and I mean quite aside from the moral question that I briefly addressed just now, and by the way, I do have Jen Psaki on Snapchat. She slid into my DM before I got banned. She wanted my seed, but because I refuse her, she got NSA to ban me from Twitter, and these are... I will be right back. Very good. I must reveal something to you. I must say something. Please do not be mad.

Jack banning me from Twitter has really made me accelerate all my plans. I got no choice. I am now in Kabul. I am the leader of the Taliban. Okay, I am broadcasting from Kabul. I am enjoying Naan with boiled lamb. I have Uzbek girl. She bring me samsa and lamplove. All I wanted in the end was to be humble internet poster and to do comedy show, but Jack banning me has made me take matter into my own hand, has made me take thing to a next level. The Taliban know I do not care about Islam, but they do not care about this. They have made me their leader because they know I have invoked my secret friend I cannot talk about. I invoked his great power of hidden fire to bring them victory and to shame all my enemies. And it is reported, it is reported, some say and some news

that the head of Talib columns moving on Mazar-e-Sharif in Toyota pickup truck column, that floated in front of the columns an amulet, a fire in the shape of a mannequin, I cannot say more, but do you see, you see what happens, Zog? Do you see, Zog, what happened? Do you see what happens, Jack, when you try to fuck a stranger up the ass? Do you see what happened, be very careful. So you see, in 2003, let me explain something how far this stupidity goes, because in 2003 America tried to make a constitution for Afghanistan, and it was immediately clear that it was going to be a total failure of a constitution. The whole project of nation-building there, a very clear disaster. In keeping with what I say in previous segments of this show, in a limited conflict like this,

the political part, not the absolute part of the war, is all important. It determines everything, right? You know the famous phrase of Clausewitz, if war is politics by other means, the politics part dominates in this type of struggle, and it becomes more politics than war in other words. And America's political decisions were so stupid from the beginning, quite aside from everything I said earlier in how they ignore the character of the people and the place. I mean, look, just to add to that, the comparisons neocons like to make about Germany and Japan in 1945 and how if America could reform them, they could reform anywhere, that's just idiotic. Germany and Japan were highly educated, highly industrialized society.

Germany was one of the biggest industrial power before World War II and possibly the most advanced scientifically and technologically with the best universities in the world. Both Japan and Germany, furthermore, had long-running parliamentary traditions, I say this on last show, and these could be easily re-established. Both countries had significant left-wing and progressive liberal-type movements, which after 1945, Global Homo, or the liberal world order, they could use these types of people to man the new governments and institutions. Again, not that I approve of this, but they had this ability, right, whereas in these new countries they don't. Furthermore, the die-hard nationalists in Germany and Japan, the die-hard rightists

also who are not nationalists, by the way, because a significant portion of Nazi extremists were not nationalists. The SS was a pan-European, not a nationalist institution, but these guys were deathly afraid of the Soviet Union and Bolshevism at the time. But they were willing to work with America, both in Germany and Japan, to fight Bolshevism. And yet without that danger, they may not have been so willing. And there are many people who say Japan, for example, surrendered because of Soviet actions in those days, not because of the nuclear strikes. None of what I've said so far apply to Afghanistan. There are no parliamentary traditions of any node, no parties. It's not industrial. not educated, it is tribal with cousin marriages ruled even by pre-Islamic custom where something

like Wahhabi Islam is a liberalizing force in fact. Actually I will talk this on next show how in Africa Islam is a liberalizing force. When you introduce Islam in traditional tribal African society, false paternity rate goes up. So, Islam is a liberalism compared to many kind of ancient traditions. So they have none of these and no fear of a countervailing and worse foreign power to drive them to you. I've been in Iraq and Afghanistan and so forth and so on, so completely different conditions from Germany and Japan in 1945. But I'm saying, okay, let's leave aside this terrible ignorance of the situation of the Afghans and Iraqis and Libyans for that matter. leave this aside, and how you miscalculate who they are and miscalculate what Syria is

and what they want and how much they do not need you and even despise what you are offering them. Leave this aside and consider the concrete political realities in Afghanistan in 2002 and 2003 in the wake of the routing of the Taliban from power. It took place at that time with American aid, right? But who routed them from power? It is true that American air power and drone, special forces especially, they were the deciding element in one sense, but in another sense the boots on the ground were northern alliance. And this is a coalition of mainly non-Pashtun tribes, there were many Tajiks, many of who had fought Soviet Union very bravely, they were tough fighters. And their leader, Ahmed Shah Massoud, the Lion of Panjshir was his title.

He had many victories against the Soviets and early jihadi against the Soviets. He was a very charismatic man who was assassinated a few days before 9-11. Now this group was not liberal by any means. They were as tough as the Pashtuns, but obviously they were outnumbered by Pashtuns who formed the core of the Taliban. But they were America's initial allies there, right? So they were basically the physical soldiers that took all of the Afghan cities, including Kabul with American bombs, American special forces help. I remember when they took Mazar-e-Sharif, but it was then the Northern Alliance. So these were the three elements in Afghanistan in 2002 and 2003. They were America, they were the Northern Alliance, and they were the Taliban, who were

obvious – they were routed, but they were not defeated, and they had retreated mainly to Pakistan aboard the region. So obviously still there, but in the background. Now in Afghan history, the Pashtuns are the majority or plurality, and they consider themselves the heart of the country, and in Afghan history, the Pashtuns represent the centralizing or the imperial royal tradition of the country, whereas the Northern Alliance, they did not want this. They did not want a centralized nation. They wanted instead a strongly federated state. They wanted very much a regional autonomy, which they should have had because they were America allies and they want it through their efforts. You have many tribes there. Okay, you have the Tajiks, you have the Hazaras

They wanted autonomy. You also have the Nuristanis. These Nuristanis are very fanatical Muslims right now about a hundred years ago They were pagan and they you know, they look Nordic even some of them not just white But if you want to see an Aryan step, Max von Sydow type face. You can find this among the Nuristani whites, but you have all these tribes in the Northern Alliance with a minority coalition, you can say, who they wanted, they say, give us a federated state. So what does America do? So you have to understand the long-running stupidity of American foreign policy. It's based on a clever, silly orientation of, oh, we do not want to form friendships to the defect of power in the land, but instead we want to be friends with the people or the

majority who supposedly represent the future of such and such land. And this is always American foreign policy, which sounds sensible, but this clever silly idiocy always leads to disaster. So in this case, it amounted to backstabbing the allies who had just helped America, the allies it had in the Northern Alliance. So they did not get their federated state and it amounted instead to favoring the Pashtuns because they were the majority or maybe in this case I think just the plurality, you can never be sure about demographic statistics, you know. So in 2003 America basically threw its allies out of the ship and aligned with the Pashtuns instead who had been the heart of centralized rule but also the Taliban.

It established this centralized presidential republic when actually a federated state made the most sense and then it did something even worse it people the institutions of this centralized inappropriate form with people the machinery with expats with people who held dual foreign citizenship with corrupt operators like Karzai. Now who is Karzai? Karzai was good to run a restaurant in Cambridge, Massachusetts and make good pilaf, okay, not to run a country, okay, Karzai, but a rug salesman. But America put him there just as it had put this other retard in power in Iraq because he had attended a lobster risotto special with David Frum, and because they had had mutual sissy jerk-off Sufi sessions with Bill Kristol, and so forth.

So then whoever was in charge of this process, and do not say they would never pay a price for it, because history has many strange twists and turns, and who knows who will come to power in America in the next few years? Who knows what scores will be settled? But whoever was in charge of this, what I just described now, but they not only created this inappropriate machinery and stupid constitution and peopled it with idiots, but then they made it even worse by outsourcing a good portion of the constitutional process to the UN human rights lobby, which is why you had the injection of postmodern idiot human rights language into the Afghan constitution of all places with requirements like 25 percent of parliament

members would have to be women or this or some percentage would have to be disabled and disabled rights. So you know this is 2003, the woke shit is quite old, do you understand? So this delusional crap was published by America through this fake constitutional process from the beginning, whereas a real constitution, if you believe in such things, but it has to be, at the very least, it has to be a formal working out of power realities on the ground as you find them, which in this case, they were totally ignored. The Northern Alliance held quite a lot of the physical power on the ground in 2002-2003, and they were totally disrespected, their wishes, and instead the whole parliamentary machinery assumed and insisted and actually stomped foot on the ground, insisting that

that the Afghan voter was an educated, independent individual who would vote his conscience. You know, there's even some line, I forget from where, but the original idiotic debates at the time, if I remember right, there is a line that Afghans know what they want from a constitution and from a government and this kind of platitude. In other words, assuming the median Afghan voter, right, like a Wisconsin Ned Flanders type in the United States, which, you know, if you have a local Nabab strongman, you don't have the ability to run this centralized democracy in this sense with the same kind of political analysis as in America, which is why in ancient Athens you have Cleisthenes, he's the founder of Athenian democracy, and to form this Athenian democracy he had to break up the traditional

tribes of Athens. reform there, to get rid of exactly this problem that local tribal strongmen would not be able to run things de facto and to pervert elections. To do the same in Afghanistan, you would have needed the overwhelming amount of force I mentioned before or that Lutvak talked about in the clip I played, which of course is absurd because there's no Western nation who wants or should want to engage in that kind of tremendous generations-long insanity. It would have to last centuries and kill off half of Afghan men to achieve in this, so it was an absurd plan from the beginning. The right plan would have been to acknowledge physical reality, allow a federated state, reward your friends, allow the Northern Alliance the autonomy that they had fought for.

Instead, the old pattern to stab your only allies in the back in favor of half-baked plans of nation-building, always forgetting that you cannot nation-build because you're not starting blank slate, they are ancient tribes with their own ways and aims, thank you very much, and they do not appreciate you telling them that they must vote women politician who have, or to have criplet office of national affairs run by half Jamaican bachabazi. Say hello to American bachabazi future president Kamala. She will turn her wrath on the American Afghan Appalachia, I wonder, will she do this? I will be right back to talk this for a minute. Should have done this in the first year of his unfortunate presidency. Please inform the Reagan-type boomer, uh, MAGA-type not to complain of this.

Biden is essentially following Trump order, which was given too late into 2020 to matter. But you know, once the order is given to pull out of a place like this, what can Biden do? Can he say no, or we will stay, especially when his left base supposedly does not want to be there either, and nobody in America does. But Trump should have acted on it far earlier, of course. But now, please keep in mind that Biden seems to be going back on it. He's saying he will send 5,000 soldiers in to Afghanistan. So you know, I encourage all of you to mercilessly mock the Chomsky mimics, the Chappell-Tards, all of the left-ways who play act at being anti-war and anti-establishment, but who in fact only carry water for Obama before the DNC and now Biden. Press them on this.

Ask them why they support Obama meddling in Syria and Libya. Ask them why say nothing about American imperialism interfering in Burma earlier this year. Right? This type, it's all Fox News and fruit company Guatemala story from 70 years ago, but they never say anything about imperialism directed at places like Burma, when the Burmese defend their national community against mudslime from Saudi Arabia support. And so, do you think the neo-Nazi capitalist deep state, by the way, would interfere on behalf of the Boers, for example, if they fought to regain some type of sovereignty in South Africa? Or would it act against them? And to ask the question is to answer it, right? So much for the anti-establishment left. So anyway, yes, Trump should have pulled out

of Afghanistan and Iraq in his first year, and in fact, the next nationalist leader of a national uprising of the type I talk on last show, they should just say that we want out of NATO, we want to close all the bases from around the world, we want to consider even an alliance with Russia against the tide of the global south. This is the real crisis, not climate change or pandemics. The real pandemic is the unsustainable population growth of the global south's third world. And properly explained, not in these words, but this would be a winning message and it would elucidate certain things to the American people. But seeing American soldiers coming back from Germany or pulling out of Spain, and did you You know this, by the way, that there is an American base in Spain, why is it there?

But seeing this would not be a humiliation to an American patriot, but only to the occupational class. And those soldiers who are there do not want to be there. They're being abused as also they are in Japan and Korea. They want to come home. And remember what Trump said in early speech, the message he should have stuck with, that He said, their victories were not your victories, their losses were not your losses. What they celebrated wasn't what you celebrated. The message should be that the country has been hijacked by these people. This is the truth anyway. What is wrong with such message? Why no pussy politician after Trump makes this message and take it further? Because you know why? They've all either come up through GOP or this, or they have other agendas, but I want

to see the trial of the 500 in public public big trial spectacular things you have not seen since the Middle Ages I'm not into lace curtain stuff like Stalin the Nazis you know but a public statement needs to be made for the education of the world in other you know so anyway speaking of that let me ask what are consequences of the happening tonight and this week in Afghanistan like Assad's endurance in Syria I think obviously is major loss of faith for American eunuch ruling third class, they will be taken less seriously abroad, they will be treated maybe even more openly with contempt by places like China, Russia, India. They will be seen as ever more unreliable allies by those who made the mistake of trusting in them. Now, this does not mean they're not dangerous.

They still have enormous firepower. They have huge arsenal and financial power in this. So now let's say, for example, no medium-sized country with a half-decent economy and which does not have nukes, no such country wants to catch their eye. They cannot do much to a place like Russia, but to Serbia or something like this. So look, why did Serbia give in when Afghanistan did not? And it's because of comfort, I think, because of bourgeois life, right? Kabul and Afghanistan were mud holes. Even by the 1990s, they had been basically mud factories for decades. But Belgrade is actually a nice place to live. Whatever you may think, actually, this year during the lockdowns, there are many frog expats who went to Serbia and to Belgrade, so you may think, okay, Balkans, but it's a nice place.

I was there over 10 years ago visiting. It was a pleasant town. Serbian girls are very beautiful. There are salsa clubs. That was a big thing in Belgrade at the time. They love salsa dance, but nice streets, decent food, and so forth. They were not people willing to live like the Afghans, in other words, and to endure those kinds of hardships. And they had lost Russia umbrella support. 1999 was neither of Russia, right, when Putin came in in 1999 to set Russia on a different course. But that was its low point. It could not help its ally, Serbia. So the United States could bully them. Now that you had this ghoul, Madeleine Halfbright, who's a war criminal, as Michael Savage say, and she thought the Serbs would give in after three days of bombing.

This was over Kosovo in 1999, but they held out for three months, I think, during which America bombed that country, committing war crimes, killing civilians. This is something else, by the way, that the Chapeau and the Chomsky left is strangely quiet about. They want to talk to you about the United Fruit Company, but not about American actions in Serbia. So even bourgeois, comfortable, modern place like Serbia, however, they were willing to endure three months of bombing, but eventually they gave in, again, because not every place in the world is willing to be Afghanistan. So I'm saying for middle-sized countries with no nuclear protection of some kind, the situation very worrisome because here you have this bully country America which might

lash out in a rage around the world now because they want to show we strong we power as is. I remind you there was a State Department official who used to regularly challenge Putin to judo matches because actually American ruling class for I call them occupational class because they do not rule but for all of their human rights language, they are deeply brittle and insecure about their masculinity, so they have to, you know, we strong and this, they put on fantasies of strong women like Saki or Samantha Power to scold, but right, so the main concern for these as well as for Russia or China or Brazil or any medium to big military power, let's say even if America will not target you directly, it's okay that you have this place run by a retarded three-year-old

that still has enormous firepower at his hands. So yes, he will fail at everything he touches, but he can still do enormous damage. So you have to be careful. But that's basically how the rest of the world sees America regime right now and ever more so. And so you can ask what effect this on other government willingness to make any kind of deal with United States. What faith can you have in your agreements or judgments when you deal with, as my friend Thomas says it, clown in pantsuit. Hillary Clinton, Saki, when you see this, when you have Saki saying these things, and a senile figurehead president, and you don't even know who is making the decisions, and the scarier part, if you're a foreign power, the scarier part isn't that there's some super

competent secret cabal making the decision, but that nobody is. That it's Saki's like turtles all the way down. But the real worry, of course, is that this deranged, retired regime, in its rage and its desire for affirmation of its strength, that they will now turn the eye inwards and replace the foreign war on terror with a domestic one. And all the signs, the drumbeat are there. This is their intention, that they intend to target what they think are fringe groups, but what in fact are the will of tens of millions of Americans, and they intend to target them with all the tools of the war on terror abroad and this. It's amazing to me how GOP, the GOP fools are refusing, for example, to pass laws that could easily fix and stop much of this.

All they would have to do is pass laws deemed most of big social media, big tech, and things such as financial provider or taxi or, you know, the internet of things, right, where they can eventually turn down your fridge or this, this whole new structure through which the economy increasingly runs, the internet should be deemed a public utility, Twitter public utility, Facebook public, they should use the same laws that prevent electricity company from shutting down your light or your phone because they don't like what you say. That is the only way out of this. But have you heard this proposal from any useless repoop running right now, even the the one who run on free speech, they do not say it. But instead, yes, they should say all of it, public utilities, and stop reframing the war

on terror in a domestic setting, stop trying to purge the military, for example, with political tests and this. But of course, I am comedy show, no one listen to me or to people who say similar things as I do, so it's up to you to think about why the poops of all stripe, why they refuse to pose these questions and instead they talk about the freedoms of Cubans and of Afghans and Afghan Malala girl or whoever, I don't know, think about it. Think about why they went along with the Trump-Russia hoax. The whole GOP went along with Trump-Russia, they could have stopped it, they went along with it. Think about why they went along with the election cancellation. You think if they mouth some populist things now that they are your friends, but remember

Remember how Rubio tried to act like Trump in 2016. So you see, the role-playing never stops. You cannot trust them. You cannot rely on them or any of the post-Trump people, so-called, until they prove themselves. So you take Ann Coulter, she will just be wringing her hands, while a carpet-munching Kamala-cloning Tampa, they will use a drone on your family. So that's a possible near-term effect of this, actually. I mean the repurposing of tactics and technology from Afghanistan to the so-called domestic terror war with automated drone patrols and many other such things. So how do you deal with this? I do not know. Maybe I do know, but you must think about it. I've told you before to make two or three very close friends who you can trust with

your life and this and leaderless resistance and this. But as for the example of the drones, people overestimate their effectiveness just to be be optimistic for a moment, they overestimate the significance of other such technology. The opponent tried to scare you with fantasies of omnipotence, with conspiracy theories of CIA super competence that are promoted by both lefts and unfortunately some on the right, but actually these things are not very effective. It's not like in Jason Bourne. They do not actually have those capabilities. Remember the Tsarnaev brothers, they're two teenagers with no training, they shut down Boston for three or four days. They caused billions in damage. They could not be found even though they had no local support. So you know, drones can be easily hacked.

Iran hacked a military drone. Many people have many computer skills. The Internet is about many things. That's an old joke. You will not get it. But then you know, there is a way to hack not the drone itself, but also to psychologically hack the drone operator. So I think this may be reason, in part, why they're so afraid of my message, right, because they can even put a mulatto in there in Tampa, but many mulatto are frogs. They don't know that. It's not a joke about the mulatto alt-right. It's a real thing. I don't know. But look, Soviet Union, they lose Afghanistan, then it fall apart very soon after. Now this decrepit, sclerotic regime does nothing else bad if they make no other mistake. But losing these wars and interventions alone, by historical standards, it spells their end

relatively soon. Such regimes fall, no matter how much they may live on the fumes of prosperity created by the old America. But I think they will not stop here. They can't. They will keep making mistakes. They're very arrogant, they refuse to acknowledge mistakes, which means they'll keep making them. They're deranged and brittle. So they will provoke something I predict within five years. Things might get very ugly, and what you need to do is be resilient and persistent like the Tully Chads. They persisted. You know, they should make a t-shirt with that. They persisted. You know, like with that girl. What's her name? Simeon. I don't know. But in the same way, Appalachia can persist. You know, the core, the real America core can persist.

If the government and their fake institutions should fail, the people remain. And the only core America has, the only being it has, you know, the people who have been here since the 1600s, just like France is not the French Fifth Republic, no matter how much the sycophants of that regime may wish, and their mouths fill, and they talk the republic this. But that's not France. France is the French people. So America is not this government. It doesn't matter how many myths you can make up about the ideals and the declaration or constitution and dress themselves up in this. Not to speak of the corruption of these things in the fake promises of after World War II in the 1960s, but the real America is not even a constitution.

It is the people who were there even before that, the frontier, the settlers, the colonists, the founders, the real founders being the founders of Jamestown and all the colonies and settlements and so forth, the frontier spirit. And it is the people in America, the Anglo-Americans like the people of France who are the nation, Not the state that feeds off of them and wears their skins. Will they have, excuse me, now Zog, you see, they make me stutter, they put something in my coffees. But I ask you, will they have this core America, the 1600s America, will they have the resilience to wait out the decrepitude of these modern states? We will see. But I will now close this lighthearted episode, as me and my friends have quite different

plans, we have different priorities outside the calculation of these petty operators and I ask recently why not this, what if we make our own cities and societies, our own society like something called dark ocean societies away from all this for a bit, Paul Kagame wait a long time, then come back in glory. Very good then, until next time, BAP out.