Welcome Caribbean reasons, episode 92, there is political excitement movement now in France like there has not been in a very long time, it exceeds the buzz around Le Pen during the last election, the presidential election in France will be next year in 2022, and it feels a lot in France right now like America in 2015, now that election is in the spring, in April I think, so by American election cycle standards that is quite soon, and there There is much ferment around Eric Zemur, who I will talk on this show. Much of my audience is Anglosphere, so maybe you heard of Eric Zemur. But I give you introduction here, I tell you why I strong support this and see a possible one of biggest openings since Trump and Brexit.

Because Zemur, even if he loses, he's already much changed term of discussion. What can be said in mainstream media, a polite society, what a main political concern of most people in France is, and what election will finally be about, which is immigration. There was a recent poll in France, amazing poll, 67% of French responded, now this is a mainstream poll, think New York Times tier in America, but 67% of French said they were concerned about the great replacement. Now in America this is called the white supremacist phrase or meme, right? But how fringe can it really be when 67 percent, that is almost supermajority, and likely it's quite a bit higher than that. And so now this is a sitting term of fringe political debate where even let us say the

cuck right, they're not even right wing, let's say center right supposedly, but by American standards they're left wing. The party called L.R., Les Républicaines, the Republicans literally. Now this is a rename of Jacques Chirac's party, it's a big party in France, the second biggest party in France now I think, and there four major candidates are using maybe not this phrase yet but they are similar language and promising very strong immigration reforms which even if it is a lie it probably is but it shows the pressures they are under. Remember in Denmark, Denmark now is an immigration restriction country because the social democrat, the ruling party, they were so afraid of, let us say, somebody like the right wing anti-immigration

parties got so much popularity that the social democrats felt they had to co-opt them to survive. And this is a very good model because in the end we just care about stopping immigration. I don't even care if it's Social Democrat or Jacques Chirac's party, if they feel they need to co-opt this issue, that is good. And if this is beginning to happen in France, this is a major change. And this change, the entry of Fré's great replacement in particular, referring to of course the demographic replacement of native populations in Europe and in the United States, the replacement by mass immigration, which the citizens never consented to, which was was forced on them by the well-known alliance between large multinational corporations and leftist politicians.

And this concept enters France's discourse right now almost entirely because of Zimur efforts and his verbal charisma. And it's so much so that the other day even a leftist candidate, his name is Montebourg, he stated I think in media interviews that he wanted to stop remittance payments, Western transfers from France to Africa, which if you remember in America in 2015 and 2016, this was again considered an outright proposal in America, a very extreme proposal, and actually Trump could have very well funded the wall by taxing remittance payments to Mexico and to Central America, but he never did. But this was now proposed by a leftist candidate in France, you see, so of course the leftist candidate Montebourg he had to backtrack and apologize, but think of major shift in political

climate where you can imagine maybe John Kerry or Schumer or Pelosi type proposing something like this, cutting remittance payments to Mexico is an amazing change. So this is all because of the more charismatic so-called extremism and intellectual showiness and power. As my friend Europe Esperance says, he has a good account that covers, let's say, happenings in European politics for an Anglo audience, he's Danish. He refuses to tell me if he's Danish James Bond, Danish intelligence, but okay. But he says it is most appropriate that in France this political earthquake, this opening of possibilities that is carried out by an outsider who's a public intellectual, in In other words, it's an old French type, a writer, a bookish man of letters.

By the way, much better public intellectuals than Bernard-Henry Lavieze, the poser. But it's very appropriate that this is the type carrying this opening in France, just like in America in 2015. It was carried out by a brash businessman consummating PR skills. In both cases, the value of the opening of political avenues is, in my opinion, what is important. It transcends not only the success or failure of these individual men, transcends even their ideas. What are their ideas after all? The ideas are not new. They're not new to my audience. They're not new to many people. Michael Savage has been promoting immigration restriction, his signature topic, since the early 1990s. Pat Buchanan somewhat ran on it before. But you know, we've had these ideas for a while. That's not the

point of the changes, the logistics, the delivery is the moment that matters just as much because Zemur, he may succeed where Le Pen in fact could never, you know, Le Pen is not let's say our French woman, she's not typical let's say French type in the same way that Zemur is French archetype and Trump is American archetype, you know, but the Le Pens frankly need to fuck off, okay, their name is toxic to so many in France that they can never get the coalitions they need to win. The various factions of the right need to be united and they will never unite under someone with name Le Pen and the washerwoman Marine Le Pen, okay. She blundered so badly in the last election by not focusing on immigration. She adulterated the point of contention with the establishment, mass migration, national

identity. this with other extraneous topics, I will comment on this later in show. But just like Pat Buchanan could never win in America, so the Le Pen and their political baggage and all the, actually the clunky political apparatus that they've built up over decades and they bring with them now, this poisons possibility of nationalist opening in France. Which is by the way the heart of Europe, France is not German here, despite the greater wealth of Germany, it is France that determines the course of Europe, which is why Zemur is so much more important moment for nationalism worldwide than, for example, Orban from Hungary, who I've always supported. But Tucker Carlson had interview with Orban and none with Zemur. Why? He must interview Zemur immediately.

Orban is good, but he is easy to dismiss for many Americans. You know, Hungary is just another vampire backward country in East Europe, you know, the Magyars, they eat pastrami horse from under the saddle and this, but, you know, they're complicit in pogroms and whatnot. I'm just saying in the popular imagination, or rather the imagination of the media, especially the lying media and its special demographic, you know, they try to dismiss Orban in part for these types of family prejudices and such, but they cannot dismiss France. You know, actually so many of the self-styled intelligentsia in America still look up to France so much. So this very significant moment, if I make an aside, there is another problem with the

Orban focus, which is that although in his own country and for European nationalism Orban is hero because he stopped a big part of the 2015 mass migration, the Merkel incited mass migration of Europe, he stopped it because they were coming through the train station in Budapest and so on, and he closed the borders. So this is what he's famous on in Hungary and in Europe, because he protects his borders. But in America, where even the traitor Mike Pence, the human puppet-pest dispenser, he went to speak in Hungary, even he went to speak in Hungary, right? And you hear the media call Orban, he's a fascist, and why is the American right interested in Orban? Even Pence, who is very mild, you know, a completely compromised character, I believe, but he went to speak in Hungary.

The praise of Orban focuses on abortion. It focuses on his opposition to the gay agenda, on the trainification of sexual politics and other such things. This is the focus on Orban in America. And Orban is correct on these matters, but you see the way it's being subtly twisted, And as it goes through the Washington, D.C., conservative, intellectual, integralist, Catholic, lavender prism, when the image reaches American discourse, the immigration and national identity part is much dimmed, and the abortion and family values thing is much emphasized, which goes along with the plans of the post-Trump, so-called post-Trump, I call it a scam because it's actually pre-Trump. I call it a scam because it's primarily pushed in Washington, DC, by people who want

to pretend the Trump movement was about Centorum and Rubio-Catholic populist conservative agenda. You see, they want to pretend Trump nationalist movement is actually about higher corporate tax rate, some populist rhetoric, Huey Long-like type thing, child tax credits, and mostly about banning pornography or some boilerplate against gays and for family. In other words, it's the Santorum thing, if any of you remember that gay face, right? Santorum, very powerful gay face. More gay face than Tom Cotton, I don't know. But, right, but Santorum lost, you see. The GOP-Cunanan party lost. The people did not want Santorum. And so did Rubio, phone boy he lost. That's not what Trump was about. It's not what the nationalist awakening

worldwide is about. It's about immigration first. And this other thing is far second, but immigration national identities first. But these people in Washington, D.C., the so-called intellectuals, they try to make you forget that. And they're sucking up to Orban is very much, what you're getting is actually a filtered Orban, a very much edited Orban, but with Zemur this filtering is impossible, this warping of this message, because he's all about only immigration mainly, so the existential problem, mass migration. So Tucker should immediately interview him. So okay, who is Zemur? I will talk on next segment about his background, I will talk on this show, his position in French politics now, his prospect to win, and who especially his support base is. I will talk that perhaps end of show.

I will be right back. Time for coffees. Thank you. It's very nice. Did you like that? I played that piece end of last show, but that particular climax has been going in my mind for a week now, so I wanted to replay it. It's Scriabin's first piano sonata. How does it make you feel? He composed when he was 20 years old, and he had damaged his right hand supposedly through over-practice on piano, but who knows, okay? But how it make you feel when you know you listen to Schumann or Chopin or high romantic like Tchaikovsky or Rachmaninoff, and you think maybe passionate scenes and memories from your past or future, and the music seems to describe these emotions so perfectly. For example, various kind of romance and longing and such.

But when you listen to Scriabin even this early when he's composing not yet in his mature style, he's composing in style Schumann, what do you hear? Because I hear otherworldly emotion in that climax which corresponds to no human reality but something from other dimensions. It is a theosophy of music. It is music from strange other dimension being. Listen to that bizarre suspension in ether. You can think of eyes wide shut world, you know, the dream world. But look, so Zemur, right, who is he? Let me get out of the way that he is a Jew, okay, a Sephardic Jew, you know, that means Spanish background, whatever, but he's from Algeria, actually he's a Berber Jew, I believe like Gaddafi supposedly was, and his family fled Algeria, now if you remember from my

My first episode of Caribbean Rism, I may have mentioned, is that the ethnic cleansing of one and a half million French from Algeria, which was part of France itself at the time, it was not just overseas colony, it was part of France itself. In the 1950s, let's say, after about 150 years of settlement, is one of the great crimes of history, the ethnic cleansing of a million and a half Frenchmen and their allies, and It's much unsung by the so-called defenders of Western civilization in this, who otherwise want you to focus on Israel. But French had been there for longer than most people in Israel had been there. So I'm tired of all this scratching. On the other hand, the Jews in Algeria, the Sephardes, were very much French loyalists

and took part in militias and so forth to protect themselves and also the French settlers and French sovereignty in Algeria. So Zemur actually was born in France itself, but he came from family that had these recent memories. They were recent refugees from French Algeria. And of course Algeria will not be remembered in 100 years as a victory of human rights and self-determination against colonization or whatever, but it will be remembered instead as part of the receding of European civilization, therefore actually civilization proper from the world. It's receding. will care about the stupid justifications that were used, or the fake nationalism of CIA bunglers like Frantz Fanon, and others like him who advocated third-world-coloured revolution against the men, right?

Frantz Fanon is a bongos daddy and hero. Another high-yellow homo. It's funny, you know, you may remember the writer I mentioned on show with Molbach, Hilaire du Berriere. Well, he documents quite some detail how much America took the side of the Algerian Marxists, how the lying Jewish press in America, and that's right, I'll call it that because that's what it is, and they took a rabid anti-French position. They championed the cause of murderous Algerian Marxism. The leftist Jewish establishment and the press supported all of this together with the Kennedys. And the result of course is this Algeria promptly became Islamist and very much anti-Israel, something they actually had not much anticipated. But remember at this stage the left very much supported Israel because it had the kibbutz

in this and it was part of the international labor left alliance system. But even seeing this you must understand the psychology of such a creature is to open the gates of Toledo, to let the Muslim take Marseille or this, and to not care about what happens next. It's their ancient function. They will put hatred of the European above self-preservation every time. So anyway, Zemur is very much however not part of that pathology, but he comes from a loyalist faction, and I just want to say a word here about his being a Jew because he's going to be attacked maybe for this, and I want to warn you about something. Now on our corner of the internet, we actually readily accept Jews and Michelings among our ranks, even those most Nazi among us, like Thomas 777, who for example, he praises many

of them, including his Sephardic mistress, I believe. He likes the Sephardic Miss Buba, but he likes, for example, Mike Levin, who wrote a book of Why Race Matters, and Levin is great, by the way. He's a classic, disputational, autist Jew, you see. But there are many such, and many of us still like Stephen Miller. Many of us still, you know, there's Darren Beattie now. Many of you like him, and there are quite a few others, and they're accepted on whatever you want to call this. I call it the faction of truth. people call it a dissident right or whatever. But of course some will reject all of them and see as a conspiracy because of their background, but those are the exceptions on the hard right or whatever, this sphere.

So Zemur's Jewishness as such would not be a reason why, let's say, the hard right or this loose vague sphere in America or elsewhere, it would not be a reason that he wouldn't be accepted. But on the other hand, there are people who are justly nervous because there are quite a few cases, people like Yoram Hazony who just did Mossad Con, or I believe the formal name was National Conservatism Conference in Orlando, Florida. And people are rightly suspicious of men like this Yoram Hazony because we see a disingenuous entryist there and in many other such cases. And people like this are very much determined by their ethnic background and ethnic loyalties And they seek to use the language of nationalism, or rather this language of Western civilization

and the West, and thus to pose as friends of the West. But all they really care about is Israel and the welfare of their own people, which would be fine if they had been honest about it. But they, you see, they try to modulate nationalism or Western identity in this way to essentially turn it into someone that defend Israel and, you know, David P. Goldman from Asia Times, Asia Times Spangler, so-called, this is another such, and there are many others I'm sure you can think of among the neo-cons and the built crystal lickspittles, they're plentiful. People who mobilize the language of civilizational conflict, between the West and Islam specifically, and seek actually to intensify these tensions, Barry Weiss is a low IQ example of this.

She should be making egg noodle raisin at community center functions, not pretend to be a philosopher, now she founded the academy in Texas, or I don't know, but when in fact the main concern of such people is to again shore up support for Israel among the non-evangelicals and to do it among the cultural conservatives who cannot be persuaded by the religious argument and so forth and so on. So we are tired of all that, you know, and people are suspicious, you know. By the way, there are quite a few non-Jews who engage in this same rhetoric. Ayaan Hirsi Ali, very much so. Others you can think of. But in France, actually, Marion Le Pen is like this. I'm saying Marion, the younger, good-looking, blonde Le Pen, not the washerwoman Marine.

But Marion Le Pen is very much part of this blogger, pseudo-Zionist world of Gates of Vienna-type rhetoric. We have to fight Islam and we're in on it together with Israel and they stand predictably in French context what this means is they very much support America, they support NATO, they support this whole NATO type, American alliance, Western values type language. But Zemur is very much not that, okay? His views on these matters are entirely in line rather with what a classic nationalist, a French loyalist would believe. So for example, he's against cooperation with America in all of its stupid ventures, He spoke out very strong against the recent American perfidy with the cancellation of the submarine contracts.

He's very much against African migration to France, you know, because this is actually a big danger of that whole view, because when you emphasize Islam, you forget the real danger might be from immigration by nominally Christian Africans in this. And he's not an Israel obsessive like this whole bunch I named. He's actually been denounced as anti-Semitic by French press. And beyond this, I think actually Zemur has been convicted twice of racial incitement. So I should think his credentials for being a genuine, realist, so-called nationalist are quite good. But why go on this tangent? Because I predict that as he enters American discourse, for example, if he does go on Tucker Carlson's show and these, you're going to hear slander against him, regardless of

everything I just said, because you're going to hear slander against him focusing on that that he's a Jew and all this. So the genuine Nazis who do this, I don't care about, they have genuine, sincere belief. I'm going on this tangent because I want to reveal to you briefly something important about the corrupt way that Washington, D.C. works. So you'll get paranoid, of course, who reject him or his background exclusively and whatever, that's fine. But I predict, here's what I try to tell you, I predict that a certain quite establishment faction in Washington, D.C., knowing how emotional people get about the Jew thing and the neocon slur, they're going to try to paint him as this for cynical reasons, right? Why would they do this? For reasons I told you.

First of all, they hate the focus on mass migration, and as this is the signature change of the last few years, this is what they try to distort, to play down, even while sometimes paying lip service to it. You might have seen recently, again I go on tangent on a tangent, but you might have seen a report from a Mexican diplomat where he reveals that there are Republican politicians who talk about militarizing the border in public, and in private they call their constituents rednecks and hope for their replacement in this. America has long had this problem, not necessarily one of ideas, but of personnel, of I don't even want to say of enforcement. It's just a problem of corruption, you see. But these people I'm talking about, they absolutely do not want migration to be the main focus.

The so-called populist Catholics, the integralists in Washington, D.C., they want, actually, they need mass Latinx American immigration. They think they need it, at least. The Vermula, the Sohrab Amari types, the people associated with that, that whole bunch, the Russ Douthats. You see that to them, again, Trump moment is not about what it is. and rather opportunity to bring things back to the centorum, so-called trad socialist type idiocy. Again, some populist rhetoric, some talk of taxing corporations, child tax credits, and most of all is focused on abortion and that whole thing, but absolutely to do nothing about migration even if you have to pay lip service. Some maybe seek to make it a subordinate matter, I don't want to get it, but second they

They do not like that Zemur is against NATO and against the Atlanticist thing, where Europe is considered part of American interest or under American umbrella. Remember France historically has very iffy relationship with this. Should they be part of NATO or not? Recently you have people like Sarkozy and Marion Le Pen and actually in France, these These are the people who want France to be very much part of the American-led so-called values world, okay, Sarkozy and this, but Zemur does not, he's not part of that. And it's these people who through cutouts, I predict they're going to denounce him as a Jew traitor and neocon and all this, which is the opposite of the truth. They promote Marion Le Pen when that is actually the kind of thing she promotes.

But they will slander Zemur this way because he happens to be Jewish, so they can catch on to that. that they can manipulate people with this hyper-emotional ethnic thing. So I see Sohrab Amari and the big populist catholic, right, he's into class analysis supposedly and this what I call dread socialism. But he wrote a book supporting the Arab Spring a few years ago. So what I'm saying, this is what these people themselves are. They are neo-cons in all but name. They just support a different version of neo-conery, you see. And these are the people who will slander. Maybe they won't do it themselves, they'll send nones online, you know, their names and so forth. But I want to remind you something many of you maybe forgot or never knew.

The old Atlanticist Department of Defense faction in Washington, D.C. was very anti-neo-con, okay, in the early 2000s. For example, the Scowcroft people, the Bush I people, they very much despised the neo-con Neocons and their plans and a lot of the heated debate did take on a character, I'm saying around 2000, around the Iraq war, that debate did take on a character where they called out to the Neocons for being Jews and for having double loyalty and all of this. Now maybe they were right, okay, I grant that in some of those aspects they were right and certainly they were right about the Iraq thing and I've mentioned before on this show that General William Oden was very much of this faction. He was my friend. He taught me many things.

We made for drink many times and he was first big general. I think he was the first big general who spoke out against the Iraq war. That being said, this faction may be anti-neo-con and may sound based sometimes when they call on the ethnic aspect and so forth. They may even call out Jews by name occasionally. So you say, oh, they're based and they may have been temporarily against the Iraq war, some of them, but they are still not your friends. Do you understand this? This is my point. They are also anti-nationalist. Put William Odom and maybe one or two others aside, he was a true believer. But for most of these guys, the problem was who had place at the pig-throw of funding and positions. Because if American foreign policy, for example, moves its center to the Middle East, as the

neocons want it, which I think is stupid, but if that happens, then the people with that expertise and those languages and those degrees and connections and networks and so forth, they will get the top positions and the attention and the funding for the programs, while the NATO or Atlanticist faction, which is the older one, who want America's center of gravity to be in Europe, which I think is more reasonable. I still disagree with it, but I think it makes more sense than trying to focus on Middle East. But they, in any case, would lose out on all of these things I just said, and vice versa. If the Atlanticist faction is ascendant, the neo-cons come second place, you know, in line for all those benefits.

So in the whole government, academia, media, defense contractor in such universe, there is only so much funding and only so many positions to go around, but however none of these factions would support someone like Zebur or Trump or any kind of nationalist. Both of these factions, although they were at each other's necks for quite a while, but both are for free trade so-called, both are for mass immigration, which is the most significant subject for me, for us if you want, and neither considers intervention abroad bad for the same reasons you or I might consider it bad. So in short, they do not oppose neocons for the same reasons you or I do, but because they get in the way of their own plans and funding and so forth.

So in another sense, this becomes temporarily irrelevant, on the other hand, because the neocons, the Atlanticists and others besides, they made an alliance against Trump because of the danger he presented to the establishment. He united all these establishment factions against him and against all of us. But this doesn't mean these cleavages within the establishment have gone away permanently. And in theory, actually, we could exploit these rivalries in the future, but that's not why I am telling you this. I'm telling you this because the opposite may, and in fact is happening. In other words, the old DOD, Department of Defense, anti-neo confection, may very well weaponize and exploit you against their old rivals, you see.

And they know, for example, that some are very sensitive indeed, maybe hyper-emotional to the neo-con Jew slur, and in the case of Zemur, they think maybe they can cynically exploit that. In the same way, they got many well-meaning, believing white nationalists, but they got many of them to believe Trump was a neo-con or Zionist or this. When you see now reports just this week that Trump gave the order to complete withdrawal not only from Afghanistan, but even from Germany, which to these people is the end of things, right? You know, they don't want that. To them, American withdrawal from Germany is the end of their world scheme. They oppose both that and withdrawal from Afghanistan, but they cannot come out and tell you that.

So they take this other angle, often through cutouts and through hyper-emotional discourse and slurs, Trump is a neo-Khan, Zemur is a neo-Khan, and this. I'm sure they will go this way, okay? Or to take the variation, this Hanania character that you see among you online now very much interacts with many of you. A lot of you retweet him. He seems to say things many of us agree with from time to time. But he runs a fake think tank with a guy from the Koch Foundation, okay? In other words, he's a Koch cutout, okay? Now maybe I should remind audience that the Kochs have attacked me specifically since my book came out in 2018. First, they attacked me through Capital Research Center and various slanders and so forth. They sent employees from that. Excuse me.

Now they try attack my throat with cough, but this Capital Research Center, which is a smear machine in Washington, D.C., it attacks green activists, and they sent people from there to attack me and my friends and dox people and so forth. Then they sent, more recently, this guy C. Bradley Thompson, And who is he? He's a professor. He runs the Koch Center, literally the Koch Center, at Clemson University. And he wrote something like 14 articles against me and my friends, and tried to dox people and threaten people, which is actually illegal, and I've encouraged them to pursue legal and law enforcement action against this guy, ChemSec's Bradley Thompson, okay? You see, because isn't that odd, the head of a Koch Center at a major university has

made it his, apparently he's become my stalker writing 14 articles against me and a comedy show and on, right, on the internet. Why is he doing this? It's odd, no? But in all the deranged attacks on me by various others, you never hear a mention of this obvious Koch coordinated attack on me and my friends, whether it's by this Chemsex Bradley Thompson But before him, there was a Randian cockling by the name of Yaron Brook, who is some kind of hybrid Israeli, lives in Puerto Rico, I don't know. He cannot pronounce my name or the letter R. He says, Buon's H. Puvette, Buon's H. Puvette. Okay, so Yaron Brook, okay, so Yaron Brook, he also attacked me, you know, make YouTubes about me, you see. This is what these people do.

They become your stalker, and then if you complain about it, they say, oh, you're unimportant. You think people care about you? Well, yes. I run Koch Center and you write 14 articles about me. Why do you do that? I don't know. Should I go on a tangent? Now maybe I will. I can speculate about why the Kochs attack me. In my old account, in my bio, I had anti-xenoestrogen activists. Now xenoestrogens are byproduct of chemical industry, which is something, I don't know if it's trillion dollar industry, but it's certainly many tens of billions of dollars, if not hundreds of billion dollar industry. America runs on xenoestrogens, they're everywhere, and they spread this filth to other countries in the world. It isn't just pesticides and many such things, it's in everything, xenoestrogens.

Many countries ban atrazine or glyphosate, but countries corrupted by American power are absolutely poisoned with them. You go to Argentina, you know, Lady of the Lake, who I had on the show, will not like I say this, but Argentina, certain parts of Argentina, it rains atrazine, okay, and Monsanto and these others, they send goons to beat people, to beat farmers up if they complain about this. They gas their children's schools with pesticide, it's horrible, okay, it's not just Argentina, it's many other countries where this is allowed to spread, and countries where this is banned, they slander those countries. They say, oh, you're an essentialist, you believe in human nature, you are a Nazi because you're banning xenoestrogens and this.

Now I'll grant you I'm a relatively small account online, but keep in mind an example I like to bring up, the movie Sideways, a crap movie with Jammati. He plays this guy, they go on Napa Valley, he plays some loser, they go on Napa Valley wine tour or this, I don't know. But he has, the main character has great contempt for Merlot variety of wine and he keeps insulting Merlot Merlot Merlot. The Merlot producers after this movie Sideway got made, Merlot producers lost literally hundreds of million dollars over the next ten years. So something, excuse me, even as small as stupid movie can have major effects, financial effects on industries, and these people certainly do not want to see some type of populist grassroot or funny type thing that pushes attention on xenoestrogens.

And I am guessing this is a part of reason why, because this is exactly what Capital Research Center does. This is a long aside, but maybe you find it interesting so you understand how Washington, Tom, DC lobbyist pressure groups in Ameriqua work, okay? So now they send these others, Kemsex, Bradley Thompson, and Yawan Bouk against me. You know, why? Because I'm quite sensitive, you can say, from everything I've told you, to coke machinations and engagement with the online right. They know we are where energy is. We are where the world attention is because we are where all the new ideas are. You cannot find new ideas really in books now or academia or internet, except really in our small corner of internet.

The dirtbag left and the left, the so-called post-left, they just repeat classical Marxist stuff. It's nothing new, you know, or others say the JFK conspiracy, thank you very much, people watch Oliver Stone, they heard Noam Chomsky lectures. The frog right is the only place where you see new ideas, which is not a great situation because we're not even really trying. We do humor accounts for our own amusement. But it turns out that world intellectual output and discourse is so stupid and low that actually me and my frog friends determine the discourse. To give you just a very recent example from yesterday, the Atlantic came out with an article using the word group narcissism, or I think they called it collective narcissism, but

But actually they meant ethnic narcissism, which city bureaucrat has been talking about for years, part of his study of Kadyhi and other sociologists and so forth. He of course has new striking way of expressing it, very funny. So now Atlantic picks up on it, same language and so forth, but in many, many such cases we determine the fountain of all new words and ideas now, you see. So they send this guy, for example Hanania and some other, why in this case Hanania? Because there's actually some common ground between frogs and cokes, coke libertarianism when it comes to stupid foreign interventions by American military and so forth. We agree on that, okay, mostly. But then they have an interest in becoming the face of this line, in owning this discourse

and replacing the grassroots energy of the frogs with their own face guides. You see, that's why I don't like face fags. As well as they are trying to emphasize this one aspect among you, namely the problems with foreign adventurism and so forth, but they're trying to emphasize this at the expense of other things like, especially migrations, or the environment, or the status of mega corporations where they obviously do not agree with you. So I went on this aside about Hanania, who is a nobody, and who is by the way unrelated to the NATO faction or the things I said earlier, but what I did is to show you how influence scams by these already existing factions, how this works online. But the anti-neocon, let's say NATO, or I call it the DOD faction, and the integralist

gay pride closeted lavender faction, they do very much similar things, and I would guess somebody is whispering in Tucker's ear to not interview Zemur. And once he does, I predict you will hear what I've just hinted at, a horrible slander about Jews and neo-condat, none of which is true in this case and which is actually true in their case, but which is promoted by people who are not our friends and do not have our aims. And they consider it actually deadly to their cause for the great replacement to enter American discourse and for the focus of nationalist energy to return, to recenter on that, on migration or great replacement, which is what must happen, okay, because all these other causes are secondary, they can be changed, mass migration has effects that cannot be changed.

And in any case, those causes are not yours, but those of operators and pig-throw seekers from Washington, DC. Anyway, this was long tangent and I still have to tell you about Zemur and who he is in France. I will be right back. Time for Kohiba Quick Smoke. The Virginia election, where GOP apparatchik beat Clinton apparatchik, Terry McAuliffe with the Merlot clown lips, was, I think, very much welcomed by most of America as a setback, a jizz on the face of the deranged Biden regime, which engages in many excesses, whether it's vaccine mandate, which may be one of the most tyrannical things America has ever tried against its own population, or the busted southern border, or inflation or many such things, the Biden regime seems crazed.

So people wanted this election, maybe puts a stop to it. In my view, Ricky Vaughan's arrest was very troubling. Some time ago, you may remember our friend Ricky Vaughan arrested for memes he made four or five years ago during the 2016 election. They were very funny jokes, obviously, and he was arrested. I think it's obvious, malicious prosecution and such. We'll see what happens. But life upturned, has to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars and much stress. And I thought perhaps they would want to come after others of us, you see it. And maybe the selection is a setback, makes them think twice, makes them calm down. On the other hand, other people are saying this election only makes Biden regime accelerate because they're not driven by calculations.

Oh, we need to calm down, so we win 2022 or 24. No, they are driven by extreme emotion and they are out for revenge. I think the Biden administration is unambiguously a punishment of the American people for having the temerity to have voted for an outsider like Trump. But so I celebrated Glenn Youngkin, even though I don't care about him, he's a Romney type, But I celebrated his win for just this reason, that maybe it's a stop to the Biden regime. The rest of America felt some relief, I think, at this similar sentiment. But I was a bit surprised, were you not, to see the intellectual nationalist D.C. class, whether it was Ann Coulter or Mattie Walsh or these people with the beard and the cognac and the cigar. And what they took from the election was freedom from Trump.

They said, oh, this election proves that we don't need Trump anymore and that Trump is over. Thank God Trump is over. So we breathe sigh of relief for one reason. They breathe sigh of relief because apparently they've been living in a nightmare since 2015 when Trump destroyed their party, exposed its corruption, exposed them all as mean little dwarf-like apparatchiks that they are. And then of course some tried to become entryists into the nationalist movement and so forth in 2017. None of these people voted for Trump, by the way, I don't know about Coulter but Matt Walsh and these types, they were all Cruz or Rubio people. And now when they were never for Trump, they pretend to be post-Trump and ask them perhaps

what exactly is the difference between their new post-Trump GOP and let's say Rubio in 2014. I think they would have a tough time explaining. Little Matty Walsh with the beard and the cigar. If you remember Mat Walsh, not long ago, this wasn't years and years ago, this was maybe 2019 or 2020 even, there was another Floyd before Floyd. A few people stopped this guy Aubrey or something because he was a jogger wearing boots and going in neighborhoods that was not his and looking inside houses. And people wanted to protect their neighborhoods, but Matty Walsh defended Aubrey and he said no, no, it's perfectly normal to go through a strange neighborhood and look in a house that is not yours because by the way there was a construction site in that house and that's what real men do.

Real men are interested in construction. Matty Walsh read that on a black rifle coffee flyer. He saw that on Spike TV. That's what real men do, Matty Walsh. They smoke cigars and do the cognac. And this guy, if you read the timeline now, all he's trying to do is cause division within nationalist right between the MAGA people, the pro-Trump people, and everyone else, you know, to emphasize things like, again, gay this and gay that, as if that's the main issue instead of mass migration. He never has a word to say about that, you see. Just like I told you. this introductory rant has nothing to do, well it has a lot to do with actually with what I talk on this show, but I want to tell you some informations about Zemur, you may not know.

So to return to subject of Zemur, if I can pass to you one fact on this show of supreme importance is that Zemur can do what he can in France, he can do what he does because he has billionaire backing and he has a platform to say the things he does and to change French discourse from that platform, which is a widely distributed mainstream platform. And I would hope he can change even a world discourse, not he himself, but by changing it in France, it can seep into Europe and even the United States. But this is independent platform, uncancellable, proprietary media. It's called CN News. It's owned by one rich billionaire who is independent, he's not beholden for example to America so he cannot be intimidated to shut it down.

And some of you may see this billionaire backing as disqualifying. I see it as a fact of life where you must accept and even emulate it if we are to win in other countries too. Now this is one particular billionaire who backs him. The name is Bolo Ray, he's from Brittany, conservative Catholic. Now who is Amour aside from this? He's public, fleshy intellectual, charismatic French type, reactionary in an American context, but in France not reactionary because he's not, let's say, a bourbon legitimist for throne and altar. He is a bonapartist, what you might call a French power advocate. He's been writing books since the 1990s, some novels, but mostly books with titles like like Suicide of France, but also some hopeful titles like French Destiny, which inspired

large following among French nationalists of all kinds, who seen him opportunity to unite the different strains of the French right. So some of the French right is Gaullist, or Bonapartist, or other kinds are thrown in ultra-traditionalist, properly reactionary type, but they see in him an opportunity to unite all these strains around the principle of historical French identity, of a destiny that binds French generations from immemorial prehistoric time, in the view of its supporters. So I will see more on that in a moment or perhaps on another show, because it's strange. Thomas Severn would understand this. It's a historical identity. It's not quite a racial identity. where Gobineau, the father of racism, believes France is not really a racial unity. It is another kind of unity.

But of course that cannot be used to support racial mixing or mass migration into France or such thing, which Zemur and all of the French right are very much against. But still they do not have a racialist conception of their country, which is important because it's easier maybe to sell that to normies. But in any case, that's his general position and you can see many interviews with him, some with translations. I will post some on Twitter soon or on my telegram because a friend did translation with subtitles and you can see the charismatic and intelligent way that Zemur speaks. And sometimes he also sounds like our friend on Twitter or Wrath of Gnon when he talk against the oppressive ugliness of modern architecture and the necessity of reviving vitality of

classical architectural and city planning forms based around beauty, now the Moore talks like this. It's very nice that we have a candidate like this, very, you know, you could say based who says all the things we like, so now in part it is his Jewish background maybe that allows him to go so far and to say many things that would make others cancelable, but in other parts I said he's already been convicted of racism and he gets called anti-Semitic So no, actually what determines his freedom, what allows for his ability to sell this is this, the platform C-News. And before this had been another channel where he had kind of, he appeared on interview panel shows and so forth, but then the billionaire Bolo Ray took full control relatively recently

of this TV station, channel, whatever you want to call it. He turned it into C news, and which Zemur now also has a show on it maybe similar to Tucker's, but interviews in France go in much more depth and then longer. So Zemur can also say on these shows, he says things well beyond what Tucker Carlson can get away with. And if you read an article, let's say mainstream article about C news, it gets called the Fox News of France, but there's no comparison, right? Because Fox News is mostly establishment anti-nationalist passive aggression, aside from Tucker's show show what is there, whereas Seniors is very good on our side, almost completely, and Zemur invites various guests – you know, Bolognese, maybe you would wish Murdoch was, but Murdoch

gave control to his fagged sons, so I don't know. But Seniors, Zemur invites even from Macron government to debate officials, and you must understand this strange position, maybe not replicable in America because C-news is mainstream, maybe more mainstream in France than Fox News is in America. And yet, Zemur, while being mainstream, can say things that are so extreme, maybe more extreme than what Tucker Carlson can say, so-called extreme, okay? Now, there are two aspects to Zemur's campaign president, two bases of support. One is his financial backing and the meaning behind that, which is interesting, but in reasons why I support him. The other base of support is the people who are pushing the war with energy and belief

within France, which is the reason I am for him, even more than his ideas, okay? Because I know the people who back his popular movement and his wit, and it's those like you and me. It's French frogs. I mean, you know what I mean, frogs like us. But for his financial backing, Boloré, who is he? again he's a Britain businessman, a billionaire, a Catholic conservative, a Britany you know is this peninsula in northwest France that until recently they sacrificed shipwrecked sailors, you know, they're cannibals, okay, they actually is one of the socialist strongholds of France, why? Because there are almost no migrants there, so they can afford to be socialist and vote for the socialist pro-migrant party because that aspect does not affect them, the same

Same reason the Basque are socialist in Spain, more or less, they have other reasons. But Vermont in America, it's almost a completely white state so they can afford to be for migration or this. So it's also the home of quite a few reactionaries though, Britanies, friends I've made, many frogs online are from Brittany, you may have seen them, and it's strange to think because in England also many frogs are from Cornwall, what does this mean? Is it some kind of Celtic animal movement? I don't know. Okay, why is he doing this? Because in 2012 or 2013, Boloré supported strikes against the socialist government in France at the time, which was under Hollande. And why? Because Hollande's socialist government tried to impose the eco-tax. What is eco-tax?

Like all leftist environmentalist measures, it does nothing for the environment, it just bankrupts their political opponents. So in this case, it increased taxes and prices for drivers and such. And Boloray had considerable logistics interests in west of Britain. He has many ports, he has trucking, that's a lot of his business. And the ecotax was hurting him financially, also was hurting his drivers, his truckers. So you know, when you are local billionaire businessman like that, and your interests are tied to the land in some ways, if this is your field, he acts like baronial lord in protection of his workers, in part, and of his financial interests mostly. And he supported strikes against the Holland government.

And this hostility he has, it spills over into hostility against Macron now, for much similar reasons, as also, and this is another layer of rivalry, Bouloure believes Macron is the toady and footstool of two other French billionaires, Drahi, D-R-A-H-I, who is a telecom billionaire and in this case it's a Moroccan Jew. He moved to France as a small boy, I think, but he started telecom business and he's about $10 billion worth. And then another billionaire, Arnault, who is the third richest man in the world, and he's from old northeast French stock, close to Belgian border. And he considers Bouloré, he considers Macron the puppet of these two billionaires. But Drahi especially is who he has a rivalry with.

And these political battles are in some sense epiphenomena of an all-out war that has broken out between Boloré and Drahi, with Zemur and Macron as proxies. So Boloré, the Breton cannibal, used the Algerian Berber Jew Zemur as muscle against the Moroccan Jew Drahi, and against his homo-hand puppet Macron. In modern times this is how it is. I keep recommending it, it's all there, what mass democracy means. But this is how it is, you need money in mass democracy, the recent truck drive winner in New Jersey notwithstanding, and to me he's much more a symbol of the greatness of what happened in this last election in America than the apparatchik Glenn Youngkin. I like the New Jersey trucker who won with $160 which he spent on Boston cream pie Dunkin

Donut and repeating MAGA memes and the Democrat are real racist and he won. I think that's great. But mostly you need money and infrastructure campaign for national elections so in the end usually it ends up being proxy battles between billionaires and such which is why In America I considered it a great thing to have a billionaire come out and run himself instead of having some meat puppet like Senator Cotton or Foam Boy Rubio or anyone on the damn side you can name who are running as a shadow on the wall. So an all-out war between billionaires Boloré and Rahe in France and Boloré sees Zemur as his man to carry the day against Macron and here's the thing. Even knowing all this, I still much support Zemur because, in part, Boloré's choice is not random.

Zemur does have genuine intelligence and charisma, and in part also because whatever the ultimate motivations of his financial backer – and by the way, I believe Boloré is genuinely committed at least to some of the nationalist agenda, and specifically to ending immigration, which is what matters to me, so I don't care. In fact, it's great if he can financially profit by ending migration. I don't care about that. You should not reflexively just say, oh, all financial backing is bad. Will you say that when many a frog who become krapto, maybe hundred millionaire or billionaire and there are already many frogs who did, I don't know if that well, but they did well in krapto, if they start to support candidates or whatever, will you say, oh, there are evil

manipulators in this and finance and politics? I don't know if Boloré is a good guy, you should like him for interfering in politics with his money. But again, so in part because whatever the motivation of his backer, let's leave that aside, Zemur is visibly changing terms of the debate, this is very important. But also in part because I know who the people are at human level, I mean who are running Zemur campaign and who his base of support is. Now, the more most fervent supporters are the rich upper-class youth from aristocratic background. They live in Versailles, for example, or the other mini Versailles of provincial France. People, some of whom I've known personally, who I strong supported for the same reason

I do not support the fake American integralist Catholics, because in France they are the real thing. They are genuine reactionaries. They are the genuine spirit of the French nation. They are the bearers of its historical and cultural identity. They come, generally background is from big families. You have, they participate in modernity, you know, they go to bars and such, they're not like the defectives who go to cognac parties and groom Matt Walsh's beard in D.C. at integralist cognac parties. Okay, I don't know what happens there, and they bow tie and, oh no, I'm against sex, but I don't know what they do, okay? But the guys in France are not like that, they're normal, I knew them when they were younger, they're normal kids and so forth, they have separate society however, with their

own schools and their own ways and such, and their own dreams for the French future, kind of like separate, just their own scouting organizations, and I see them as the best of France. And in 2013 these youth, under the encouragement of the pagan nationalist Dominique Wenner, See, they don't say, oh, I hate Nietzsche and Wiener because they're paying this affectation. Although they are Catholics, they were inspired by Dominique Wiener in 2013, May, and so forth, they come out in force in the streets in a mass uprising. I talked this on the first show of Caribbean Rhythms. I don't want to repeat myself too much, but I came on Twitter for the first time to observe them in real time and to help boost, with a tiny account, but to help boost and give

support however I can to take part in that excitement I was seeing in France at the time and they were using Twitter the way it was meant to be used to organize flash protests, to organize confrontations with the police and so on. They were saying go to that street, hide behind that corner and this. And briefly they piggybacked, I'll just give you a brief background, but they piggybacked on anti-gay marriage protests and pro-family, did Matty Walsh ever protest gay marriage when it got passed by judicial fiat in the United States. Now he's a big family supporter, you know. I have nothing but contempt for these, you know, the groomed beard and cognac and cigar and masculine, oh, so masculinity thing, okay, so whatever, you know.

But, so they piggybacked on these anti-gay marriage protests in spring 2013 in France. They were huge anti-gay marriage protests. The French actually came out to defend their traditions. The American conservatives rolled over. There were no protests in America when gay marriage got imposed. In France there were protests. There were rallies by respectable French boomers, huge, million people or more. But at night these groups of brave aristocratic youth took on Vener's call, Dominique Vener's call to defend French civilization from mass migration specifically. They realized it's really actually not about gay marriage or abortion or disease, it's about the real danger is mass migration. And they went physically head to head with the police and the officials of the corrupt republics.

They fought them against Hollande's filthy socialist government. And my friend Espy, he went to Paris to meet quite a few of them. Now tell me, should I go there now and meet old friends again and to observe what's going on? Maybe if it heats up in France I will. I don't mean to say, by the way, it was just the aristocratic youth, it wasn't just the aristos either back then or now. Brave youth from all social and economic classes came out to support French identity in 2013. Right now, Zemur is the second most popular candidate among the French working class. But it is exciting for me to see people who I knew in 2013 and now they are running the Zemur campaign. Samuel Lafont. You can find his Twitter. I will post these names maybe on Telegram or things, but Samuel Lafont, he's a veteran

of 2013 street battle. Now he runs the more social media and Capuchin patriot. I don't want to try French pronunciation, Russia peasant, I don't know how to do it. But Capuchin patriot, who I remember from that time also, and now she's proud mother of a big French family. become mother is beautiful to see how well some friends turn out. Her ad is Kapu underscore Patriot. I will post these on Telegram, but she is now Major Zemur supporter and activist. She explains why that finally he is able perhaps to unite what I told you earlier, the various disparate factions of the right around this hope of a unique French historical destiny that animated her and her friends and that is expressed mostly in trying to stop this

mass migration that is immediate project and many others from that time I dare say even all of them pay maybe are with the more I've heard all of them are actively or passively is with the more and I stand with my friends and you know again I came on Twitter in the beginning for them and it is spirit of 2013 France also that was behind Trump moment in 2015. I'm not saying directly that Trump knew of this or anything, but it is a hidden spirit that's spanning the European world of hopefulness and of a new beginning. I like this. So this is why Zemur excites me, because I know the people animating his movement. And it's not all boomers, it's not apparatchiks, it's young nationalists with an entirely new vision. It's the French version of us. Some of them listen to this show.

And I could also add, why not Le Pen, okay? Why you say, why you need Zemur, why not Le Pen? Because Le Pen's system has by now become a kind of another small old establishment itself. The Le Pen apparatus, it blocks all access to political life on the nationalist side for anyone who's not part of their system, right? So the entire non-parties in the right had nowhere to go because you see the Le Pens, They eat everything up on that side. And furthermore, they have no real vision anymore. It's another batch of technocratic, soulless operators and political operators. Most significant also is Le Pen's economic idiocy, where in the last election she ran against Macron, I've said this before but it bears repeating, but instead of focusing

on the issue that could have been a winner, on immigration, on which there was a difference with Macron where she held the upper hand with most of the French population. She confused the issue, she confused the matter by trying to make herself the socialist economic populist against Macron's neoliberal corporatism so-called. So you see, for many French people this just was not a concern because all this bananite rhetoric aside, okay, I'll give you the United States that it may apply there, I don't really think so. But France actually is a highly over-regulated economy. Actually I think America is also, you know, but I'm trying to found business now with MENA. We have a wonderful energy drink of power and we are in regulatory limbo. We need to solve it. America is very

far from a free market society. But France certainly is a highly controlled economy. So you know this demographic I just mentioned, whether it's in France or Argentina, they're They're not going to vote for somebody who promises even more onerous regulations and more of this kind of class rhetoric, when that's what the socialist parties that support mass immigration do, and when the problems right now are not really mainly economic. They have to do with national identity, they have to do with the racial hatred mobilized by the left, and again migration, immigration, mass demographic replacement, that is it. In other words, Le Pen, what did she do? She ran on the D.C., Washington, D.C., Santorum, integralist, threat socialist kind of reforming

content that does that or now the Rubio type ticket, okay, the people who call themselves post-Trump now. She ran on that and she lost, right, so they do not agree with this economic term some of you want to take where just because you can recognize some multinationals are in bed with the left but then you want to sound like a Marxist professor and talk about the depredations of capital and this, and why do you do that? Because you cannot, you're not allowed to name a usurious bastard by name like Paul Singer or talk about Somalis groping your sister in the streets. See, Putin didn't talk about lowering, excuse me, raising corporate tax rate. In fact, Russia has one of the lowest corporate tax rates. Putin did something else. He put the oligarchs who are anti-nationalist in jail.

See you can't do that, so you want to sound like Chomskyite, so why shouldn't nationalist capitalism be possible anyway? I think I will write a soon article on these suggestions for a national capitalism to support local small business and fight against multinational chains and such based on Japanese laws that protect it. Why no repoop politician takes this very simple angle, but in any case the economic fixations of the Le Pen camp in an environment where national identity and racial strife is top, and she goes on this economic thing, and she actually took on a Marxist advisor, an openly Marxist advisor during the last campaign, okay, a gay guy named Philipo and so forth. She entirely derailed the Le Pen message by switching again from immigration to these

stupid Santorum-type obsessions, you know, you're going to run on child tax credit and and boilerplate leftoid anti-corporate rhetoric and various niche social issues and this basically again what the post-Trump scammers are trying to run now, okay, you see, you see, so it doesn't work. People don't buy this. People are worried because they live in Yugoslavia 1980 slow motion breakdown. This is what they are worried about in America or in France about racial hatred that makes it hard for a Frenchman to walk the streets of Lyon without getting harassed when he does not recognize his own city anymore, or tent city in Paris, you know, talk about tent city Los Angeles, please, they don't want to surrender their inner cities, by the way,

so many American cities have been made no-go zones for whites. French don't want that. Beyond this, they see an opportunity to reassert the historical destiny and unique greatness of their own nation and plot a path separate from this gay bongo number 2 trans world hegemony, whatever you want to call it. Darren Beatty calls it the gay American, excuse me, the globalist American empire. But if Zimur can win, that's a great thing, but if not, he has already opened the door by changing national discussion entirely, and by giving my friends there, who are your friends, who are just the French version of us, he gave them the spirit and experience to organize national campaigns, and this is something far bigger than Generation Identity,

which is a smaller group, it was great, I was for them, but here you have something far bigger, you have the determinant bearers of French culture, an alliance with the working class who are awakened. So I repeat to them, and I close now on this episode, as I did on my first show, I tell my French friends, eventually, please, bring out the pikes, bring guillotines, bring public tribunal, nuclear weapons revolution.