Welcome to Caribbean Rhythms, episode 97. I am sorry to say that a good frog friend, Knight Errant, this was his name online. Knight Errant, he died yesterday. Please send power to his family. He leaves behind a 14-month-year-old son. I've known Knight Errant for many years. We had been talking in private and he was a very strong Catholic, the right kind, an uncompromising fighter in every way, a born knight. I think so. I think he was, in medieval time, he would have been knight errant. And he also teach me many unusual things about Tolkien, about the hidden world secrets of Tolkien and about Catholic and church history and various factions in many such thing about theology and saints history that I didn't know it is a great loss.

He was an ally on that side and also a personal friend and actually I was recording this show last night when I first heard the news but I was so upset I had to stop and I apologize also by the way to audience for delay in general with this episode. Some matters had to be taken care of. I had rather complicated time switching location again. I am in hiding, nobody can find me but I think you will be happy at schedule of next few shows. I don't want to over promise though but we see. But this affect me very deeply, the loss of Knight Errant. He was a relentless fighter for his faith, a defender of the faith, you could say. He rallied many Catholic friends. I might talk on this show. He exposed the leftist, caponized Catholics, so-called, and the tricks of the fake integralists

in Washington, DC, and many such. Catholicism is very important in this game. So you remember the block identified by Roger Stone, the voting block, you could say. He did so in work with Nixon in 1970s, but they became the so-called Reagan Democrats. These are Northeast, North Midwest, urban and formerly urban white Catholics, ethnic background mostly, Polish and such, ex-Polish, Italian, but they are the ones able to take any anti-establishment candidate to victory now, which means any right-wing candidate because the left is complete establishment. So any genuine right has no future in the United States without the support of this, the Catholic community in America. They carried Trump to victory in 2016 and if we are honest also in 2020 when Trump yet

again he won Ohio by 10 points this time and therefore all of the surrounding states as well which have the same demographic no matter what the GOP and DNC will tell you about that fake election but so the efforts to propagandize and to break up this group in various ways they try to subvert their interests in Washington DC and their toadies in media it's very intense attempts from establishment outfits many of them focus on Catholicism which is why you should be interested in this matter even if you are not a Catholic I'm not a Catholic I never was but I've been made aware of this problem it's a central place American politic America future, which is why you have fake converts like Vermin Muller, who found his road to Damascus moment apparently in 2016 of all years.

But that type of man and his gangs in Washington, D.C. and other such who are trying to change the meaning of what Catholicism is and so forth, they are converts but they come, hello fellow Catholics, I'm going to tell you what your faith really means and this. And Knight Errant, this poster and close friend, he also has a recent podcast, I was going to go on his show, but I will link it for you, you will see what he say and so forth, but his tweets also wealth of information about history and also contains his fighting spirit. And he was very important in exposing these factions, understanding also their Jesuitry, And he understood very well what they imagine are their subtle tricks, which are not so subtle at all.

But Knight Errant, thinker on Catholic history and many other things beyond this, and I remember fondly our talks. He teach me mysteries of Tolkien, many such things. He was a man of, hard to explain, but great personal seriousness and intensity, but in a casual way. In other words, you know, he was not humorless spurg and zis and you can't joke. You know me, I like to make joke, I like to say outrageous thing. But he understood we were on same fight against kingdom of darkness. And he had a very kind of, even I think before he discovered he was sick, he had very kind of casual intensity of somebody who possesses true seriousness of intellect and mind. You had to know him to talk to him and find this out, but it comes out in many of his

tweets which I will try to promote over the next few weeks. Let me read you, for example, just one of them. I'm quoting him now, he says, pain and anguish can sometimes lead to thoughts about death, the brevity of life, and how much time we have to do the things we wish to, or even to speak the truth. But we really think or live in a vague circumspect fool's politeness. And this, I think, captures some of his spirit very well. He had no time for, he says it in the reply to this, charity means love. It does not mean pussyfooting. Dislike or hate rarely means uncharity. He was like this, no pussyfooting, no nonsense. I very much enjoy our talks. And he introduced me to other Catholic friends in his groups and so forth.

There are many of them who are powerful, completely entirely on our side. I greatly miss him. I consider even to delay my show some more because I was very upset. But he was a fighter and he did not want people fretting over his problems. He rarely talked about it. I thought actually he was okay. I didn't know. So he didn't like to talk about this, so he wouldn't have wanted me to maybe delay show even more, but quite the opposite. Actually I wanted to do it last night even so, but I was just too upset by this news. He hid the gravity of situation from me, which it is like him to do. But if anything ever happens to me, by the way, I would like friends to do the same. I do not want people to wail and so forth about me, but to have a celebration that includes

jokes and levity, you know, like if you see Southern Black Funeral, you see sometimes this movie with much cheering and trumpet brass bands, and with jokes and feast of vitality, I like that. Or in Iliad they have contest, athletic contest in honor, you know, so I say also in my book example of Etruscans who had scenes of overwhelming life on their sarcophagi, same spirit as this, other nations do the same. And then I would want friends to focus on vengeance, and to avenge me. And forgive me, I know some of you who listen are Christian and you believe in forgiveness, but I follow a path of Theognis the Megarian, an aristocratic ancient Greek poet, and he hated the filthy Pelasgian democratic movement dissolving Greek society.

And he says at one point that he wishes he could drink the black blood of his enemies. Theognis says this. I would want you to avenge me. As I hope in part on this show, too, but going forward, I hope to avenge this friend, Night Errand, but others, too, who I've known, who I've lost to cancer and other diseases and malaise, which has caused, you know, it's not normal for a man in his late 20s to have this. It's caused by mass systemic poisoning of life, which there is, you can try to do some things in your individual life to avoid it, But it's very difficult because it comes from so many different sources now. Airs, waters, places for the food supply, it's a poisoning done knowingly and for profit and for short-term gain.

If you are susceptible to it, you can do basically everything right and still get destroyed. And I've been trying to expose these people, the Monsanto and associated people, for a long time and I will mention some more on this show and I will intensify efforts going forward. beg also Menacridone IV who has great ally in this fight and others to return and continue it. It is great opportunity for us to expose one of the worst part of so-called establishment but in any case I say welcome to show to many frogs around the world are reporting feelings of not feeling well, I hear this. Frogs and not frogs, I hear from everyone. Some are infected of course now by Omicron Chan but many simply have undefined feelings, Physical malaise, this is what I'm hearing now. I don't know.

Look, have any of you ever tried going into a public bus or a subway, any public transportation with a large plastic, clear plastic bag of white flour inside it? Or maybe you don't want to use wheat flour. You fill it with glutamine, the amino acid, or other such white powder, harmless white powder, but you fill the bag and then you run into the bus and you drop it on the floor and you run out, you know, you let the bag slightly open and the powder sort of come out and you run out of there. Has anyone ever tried this to see a reaction? What happened? No, officer, it was a gift. I wanted them to inhale theanine and to relax. You could say that when you get caught. I joke. Please do not do this, of course. No, it's very dangerous.

But one time I was in Judork, I was walking with friend and, you know, I was eating burrito and I don't normally do this. I don't eat burrito at night, exception, but in my case it actually is an exception. But I fear to say this because when you have this exception mindset, if you give yourself exception, exception, exception every few days, it's led to fattening all over the world. In Brazil, if you look at the obesity curve, something like it has doubled in the 2010s. And before this obesity curve in Brazil, just before that in the 2000 to 2010, it's agrochemical market so-called, meaning basically pesticide and this it grew by 200%. Now then you could say they need it because they have huge growth of soy and sugar and so forth in the tropical environment. So they say they need this.

By the way, as another aside, I give you a piece of advice. Never, never drink sugarcane juice. I know it's romantic. You're in a tropical country. You see these people with the sugarcane juice pressers. You want to try it and actually fresh pressed sugarcane is delicious. This happened also in Southeast Asia. But I strongly recommend that anything like sugarcane juice or the acai berry, if you You know, which grow in Amazon, but I think now in other countries too. Do not eat this, please, unpasteurized, because there is a bug. In Portuguese it's called the barberu. I think it is the kissing bug in English, but I forget. And it carry very dangerous disease. I believe it carry the Chagas disease. Is debilitating, awful disease, can kill you. And they don't clean.

It likes to live in the sugarcane and in other berries and certain other crop, tropical crop. And when it's processed, if it's not pasteurized, you may ingest this bug, part of bug with the disease. The disease lives in its feces. So if you live in southern United States, you have to be careful if you see this bug. I think they're called kissing bugs because they bite your face when you sleep, but their feces contain this very dangerous disease so you have to be careful where you step and so forth. It's one big problem with increasing tropicalization of the world, but this is just one among many problems if you try to have a big agricultural tropical power and so then they increase pesticides In Brazil, even from 2000, as I tell you, the market just in that decade grew 200%.

Again, it's one of the most poisoned countries in the world, second only maybe to United States. And unfortunately, in the last few years in Brazil, you see the effects on the daily man with this. It was just severe inflammation which shows on the face, slight jaundice. Okay, not everyone, and I do not want my Brazilian friends to think I'm attacking that nation in which I have lived before a long time, and I used to admire the physical power of the people there greatly, but I would almost say now, in the last few years, well over half the people you see on the street, and the men especially, are affected regardless of the race, and it's supposedly a racially diverse country, but almost all the faces of men you see on the street, and most women, but it seems to especially affect the men,

which tells me it is a chemical xenoestrogen poisoning that affects men somewhat more than women, although it poisons the women as well, by the way. But it's supposedly a diverse country biologically, but it doesn't matter what face you look, whether it's black, mulatto, white, or Indian mix or this, all the faces are converging to the same thing. It's like its own race, which is sick, you know, it has these slit, half-closed eyes and moon face, which is typical of inflammatory response, some type of cortisol problem, and it is not racial transmogrification, as Hakan likes to say, nor is it a reversion, you know, if you look at dogs around the world, when they're not under human breeding, especially in third world, they all revert, all around the world they revert to this dog type, medium

size yellow dog, Steve Saylor says, you know, he says it in response to that mulatta New York Beta Times idiot. And he asks, you know, that is a default dog around the world, biological type. And is that a default human in same way? Something brown, slit eyes, sort of shapeless, average in every way. My friend Yama wondered this when I explained to him what I had been seeing. But no, I think in Brazil, and not only there, but I was there recently, or maybe I am, I do not reveal to you where I am, but I saw this and it is inflammation from mass poisoning I think. And you see it happening very fast to people in their early 20s, meaning younger people don't really have it and then very quickly, and what explanation could this be, especially

for men it mean when their own endogenous hormone production, they are producing somewhat less testosterone after 18, 19, 20, 21, and it gets replaced by whatever this is. And I'm guessing again it's pesticides which happen to be xenoestrogens and so forth. And I will write open letter to Bolsonaro soon. By the way, it's very interesting, just today Bolsonaro cancelled student debt. Isn't that interesting? Don didn't do it, but hard right fascist corporate dictator Bolsonaro, he cancelled student debt. I don't know, tell Glenn Greenwald this, I love Glenn Greenwald, but why he would support the candidate of the corporate media in Brazil, which is Lula, is very strange. I thought Glenn Greenwald was against that group.

Well, he's against it in the United States, but why is it for it in Brazil? another subject I talk another time but please be on lookout for this open letter I will write to Bolsonaro I think I don't know who will read it from outside our friends but for me it will be important letter because I will send certain message in it and I will send it to Washington Post speaking of media there is an attack on me I don't know if you saw this a bunch of slithering verminoid and excuse me if this is strong language but these are literally parasites. I can't imagine being a writer or a journalist and being so bereft of your own ideas and intellect that you say oh I'm going to make for example even the far left my beat. I myself don't even know the names

of leftoid podcasters. I don't care so much but even beyond that for me to imagine to glom on to just one leftist writer or in this case one Samizdat a writer, right, one right-wing writer, to say, I'm going to make my career as a journalist studying the work of that one guy, and that one guy is not Kant or Plato or this, he's like, you know, a guy with a comedy show, you know, and a small audience like me. Which more than one of these supposed journalists and tweeters, more than one has made me their career essentially, they're literally parasitic on me. They're stalkers in some cases, like Kemsex Bradley Thompson, who is the Ayn Rand Koch professor of Koch studies at Clemson University. But he at least has other interests besides me. He has his own book and so whatever.

But these guys are much worse than him with their fixations on me or on friends and their inability to write anything even as dull as what he vomited out. But so anyway, I ignore because they don't get any interaction. So it's better to ignore, not to promote it when you're being attacked. But just to tell you what is going on and the way these people operate, immediately after some schizophrenic in Colorado, two days ago I think he went on a shooting spree. And these people, they do threads and tweets about how he's supposedly inspired by me, which is provably untrue. But I mean immediately they do this, right? I hadn't even heard of the shooting until the next day. I woke up late. And I see these guys had threads up in minutes trying to blame me or to stir up electronic mob.

Well, I ignore it for now because it's so absurd. Nobody believes it, of course, but I'll see if I have to make statement on it later on this. But just to show you how these Stalinist liars work with guilt by association, so forth. The guy had nothing to do with me or my book, you know, other than he read my book once and apparently he had a thread on it. But the attack itself was for personal and financial reasons against the people that he knew. He knew them personally. And it had nothing to do with any really political or ideological cause as far as if you read mainstream news articles on it, they go into this. It also had something to do with his schizophrenia or other lunacy, I don't know, where in his

own book, he wrote some rambling book apparently in 2018, and he prefigured or essentially described this attack that he did just now in a kind of so-called fictional form. So he described what he was going to do. But he did not read my book or comment on it until 2020 or so. This what I am told, I don't study this, I don't read him, but that's where his thread on me is from. So for this and many other reason, it has nothing to do with me, but you see the kind of vile lies who are told by people who are so full of spite and jealousy, they make up either this or they claim, others of them claim, oh, he's funded by Teal or this. Let me actually go into another tangent about Peter Teal and say something about that.

Anybody who accuses people of being funded by Peter Teal is not your friend, okay? What would be wrong with being funded by Teal? He good guy and he should have funded Frog Twitter in 2015 and 16 and 17, but by the way he never did. Neither me nor anyone else in Frog Twitter got money from him or anyone else by the way. But if we had, what would be wrong with it? I would have liked to, you know, at that time. People who think it's sinister are essentially saying that those on the right, you know, or as I say on the faction of truth, should not ever have any elite support or billionaire supporter funding, right? The people who say this are not your friends. They want you to be deplatformed, marginalized, without any – you know, why is Zimur making such advances in French society right now?

And he, as I told you on show about Zimur, he may not win. He is not doing in polls so well. The polls are fake in France, we will see. But his phenomenon in France right now, his rallies are huge, full of young people. He has a billionaire backer, Bolo Rey, which this billionaire backer has his own television channel and other platforms. So Zimur cannot be the platformer. He doesn't care and he will say the truth and so forth. What would be wrong with that? We should want that for the frogs, but we never got that, by the way. I never got money from any donors, any funders or anything else, just so you know. I would take, however, wire transfers from Antarctica, yes, I would do this. the man himself hiding there under Lake Vostok in moon-like future base, and he channeling

it through safe house in Cape Town. But aside from that, nobody can afford me at this point. That's another thing. I don't want to get into that. But I put one time on my account on Twitter the number of subscribers I have to this show. Nobody can afford me now anyway. So another strange point about this Colorado attack, okay? So I get immediately blamed for it by these so-called extremism researcher parasites. And it turns out that this guy, the schizophrenic shooter, whatever, he had actually far more extensive contacts and interactions with others on what these people consider the right or the far right, with Nassim Taleb, who this guy considered the mentor. Nassim Taleb with Jordan Peterson, with others whose names I will not mention, with Eric

Vineshine, who is a member of the intellectual Dork Web, and who interacted with this guy back and forth in tweets and so forth on many occasions, you know, all these people have audiences far larger than mine. But for some reason, these extremism researcher guys, I don't know the reason, they focused on supposed contacts with me, despite what I told you before about how late he read my book and so forth. In fact, we never interacted and so on. And I'm not saying this to deflect blame, because those guys I just mentioned, Weinstein or whatever, and I don't like very much some of them. For example, Nassim Taleb has become a joke compared to what he was. He's become the kind of man he was attacking. But even so, they do not deserve blame either because, again, this guy had personal motives

and so forth, but I just find interesting, don't you find interesting what these extremism researchers, what their priorities are? I think interest. I guess it's worth asking, was this guy a plant of some kind? He was on FBI radar, for sure. Like Orlando shooter, like Boston Marathon bombers, will there be as Cernovich rightly demands congressional hearings about what FBI was using this guy for? It's not the first time FBI attempt to use lunatic blows up in their faces. So okay, enough about this, but just so you see filthy Stalinists and their lies, but most of all how petty people can get who cannot accept that I wrote a fun book that people enjoy and then because this they need to come up with, you know, I never understood it.

You know, I read sometime Pindar, ancient Greek poet, and he frequently complains he he has sometimes small lines aside, he complains about the lies of the envious. I never fully understood that, why this amazing ancient poet would take time to attack the chattering lies of the envious. And not that I compare myself to Pindar and what I write, I just internet post or I make jokes but as soon as you get any notoriety in anything, the envious do start to make up lurid lies about you. So look, where was I? Yes, Brazil has doubled its obesity rate as I see at least in the 2010s and I think accelerated in the late 2010s which is a disaster because it's a disaster for any country but in that particular case the biological beauty of its inhabitants was one of their great unique

national assets and they just threw it all in the toilet. And I thought it was because you see the bakeries on every street corner and the long lines for sweet pastries. I think it's part of it. But then also there is the habit girls have all around the world. Everywhere, England especially, you're going out drinking late at night and then after you drink you get hungry and they go to pizza bar and they have a quarter of a pizza with ham, cheese, bacon, okay. And then you have the predictable decline. You do that even two nights a week, but sometimes they do more, and this is aside from the mass systematic poisoning of the populations that I noticed, which I'll write Bolsonaro about in open letter. Again, look for it soon after New Year, repeating some of Trump's mistakes.

So anyway, I was walking late-night Brooklyn burrito, and I was about to finish burrito, And just, you know, I had this negroid urge to litter, so I just violently threw the burrito behind the truck. It was night, I thought there was nobody around, I was done, and I threw it, but it just so happened that a cop car was passing intersection. I do not make this up. Just at that moment, when I do this, they come, they pass, and I guess they only quickly saw me violently throw something, you know, they thought I was hiding it from them, I I think that the lights come on and they stop me and the friend I was walking to inquire. Now I don't again think they thought it was littering. It was more, you know, they thought I was hiding drugs or whatever.

And so they go there with flashlights and they look at it and expect and they, you know, indeed it is burrito. They asked me for idea and my friend says, no, this is Bap. He doesn't say Bap. He says my name. You know, he's a student. He's just a student. He's harmless. You know, and maybe this convinces them, you know, he's harmless, like, he make me sound like retard, okay, and maybe this convinces them, but they lecture me for littering, and they make me pick it up, okay, so I was acting bantu, but you know this, you can use, if you throw glutamine in Subway, and they catch you saying, I'm a student, I'm harmless, I'm mildly retarded, you know, I joke, do not do this, okay, I'm all about peace and following

the law. Now imagine if you're on an airplane and it's landing and just as it, you know, it's about to land and it's coming, you say in loud voice, we're coming in too fast, we're not going to make it. What do you think would happen? I'm not recommending any of this by the way, but what do you think airline would do? I've been thinking about this all day. What can I say? I was going to talk to you on this opening segment about politics, but It bored me. What can I say? I was thinking instead of lighter thing to take my mind off, but I was going to point out, excuse me, things like the, you see they're attacking my throat now, but things like the Mexican diplomat who wrote a piece for Center for Immigration Studies, I think, about Republicans who used to talk tough on immigration.

They used to run on militarizing the borders and then in private, I mean, many of you, This was posted recently, so many of you may have seen it, but there's an advantage. Let me just read two short paragraphs. This is an article posted a while ago, but that was reposted recently about what a fraud the GOP is, okay? I'm reading now. While I can recall many accolades for the Mexican immigrants and for Mexican Americans, one white congressman even gave me a high five when recalling that Californian Hispanics were headed for majority status. Now this is a Mexican diplomat writing this. He continues, I remember a few instances when a legislator spoke well of his or her white constituencies. Excuse me, constituents.

He's not saying he remembers a few instances, he's saying he remembers few instances. One even called his own constituents rednecks and apologized to us on their behalf for the incorrect attitude on immigration. Most of them seem to advocate changing the ethnic composition of the United States as an end in itself. Jefferson and Madison would have perhaps understood why this is so. Enthusiasm for mass immigration seems to be correlated with examples of undermining the just and constitutional laws they devised. One leading Republican senator over a period of months was advising us through a mutual acquaintance about which mechanisms to follow and which other legislators to lobby in order to ensure passage of the amnesty proposal.

In the meantime, he would speak on television about the need to militarize the border. This senator was recently singled out by a taxpayers advocacy group as a leader in pork-related politics. Bill Richardson, who had served in Clinton's cabinet and later became governor of New Mexico, kindly stopped to speak to our delegation at the Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles. He commented favorably to us what do Hispanics want? Fully funded government programs. The economist mentioned about his state and so forth. Let me read you something else. Also from this Mexican diplomat telling you about dirty truths that most of you probably already know about DC politicians, including GOP, I continue reading.

Though similar stories involving lesser politicians do not make headlines, several lawmakers we We met also had a special giddy mystique of Mexico as a place where moneyed leaders coexist to tame, grateful citizens. It would seem that the American political class has a special affinity for their colleagues south of the border. The appeal of their lavishness and impunity seems to strike a positive chord in the American politicians who perhaps resent being held accountable by their citizens, who cannot become wealthy from politics and who may be removed from power, quote unquote, unfairly and without warning. Isn't this interesting? This is from a Mexican diplomat at the Center for Immigration Studies. He has an article from 2006, I believe, it's called Immigration and Usurpation, Elites

Power and the People's Will. Strong recommend you read it. I was going to talk at length about this and such thing on this show. I was going to mention to you how the border wall was passed in 2006 I think by such types. And I was going to warn you if you're tired of Trump or disappointed in him which is normal, but to warn you against falling back in the arms of these GOP establishment fakers who say the right things and try to sell themselves on competence in this but who are the most corrupt faggot lavender mafia liars you can find anywhere, they are whores who Japanese businessmen used to buy for $30,000 in a dinner and a ride in a private airplane in the 1980s. And even more so, you know, what can you say about it? By the way, there are frogs infiltrate GOP.

But these frog or frog friendly people and candidate, they come after 2016 and 2018 mostly. The ones from before then, who you can count on, like Stephen Miller, they strong supported Trump in 2016. But the ones who come after, who are infiltrate GOP on local level, some of them are very good people. But they will not really be able to run for national office or something like president or anything in at least 10 years. So it will take time for frogs to take over GOP, it will fall in their laps. But for now, for you to fall back on GOP establishment figures who have been there their whole lives from before Trump, who did not support Trump in 2016 because they hated the program he ran on, in particular this thing on immigration.

How can you fall back on this gang who actually sabotaged his presidency? I don't know. But I was going to talk some of this on this show. And even more so about fact, America has quite strong immigration laws actually, right now. You don't need new laws, but the laws right now are not enforced, they're selectively enforced. So that any American man, for example, try to marry a European woman, you will find out America has very strong immigration law, very strict authorities and regulations. You will have vindictive carpet munch, Janet Reno type, Les Boyd in his house, checking toothbrush, checking this nickel and diming him and trying to find reasons to stop it. How dare you not choose one of our 35-year-old well-fucked American women who will divorce in a year. I don't know.

And it's not just anti-European, by the way, although it's mostly that, but it's anti-civilization. The Japanese are treated the same. They don't want a Japanese engineer. They want, you know, Sudanese, again, who will grope your daughter or this. They don't want a Japanese artist or this. And even actually from equator close cultures, too, also, in some cases. For example, if you're an Indian tech guy, the INS may come down on you hard, also, because they think you have money. This is how it works, these so-called laws in failed society. There is speech by George Borjas on this. You can find on YouTube. He is a Harvard economist. So George Borjas, right? He is a good immigration economist and if you look at YouTube, he is giving this one

speech I think actually about the Mario boat lift or I don't remember what exactly. But he's an immigration doubter. He has a study I think showing that mass immigration from Cuba following establishment of Castro regime. So now George Borjas is Cuban himself and an immigrant I think. But here's a study about how so-called Mariel boatlift, which happened in 1980, and for a long time economists tried to argue that this improved economy of Miami and this. But it shows the obvious that it lowered wages. Of course it lowered wages. Not only that, immigration makes employers more arrogant. It lowers living standard experience in every way for labor, for the employed. But at the end of the speech, please listen, this is very revealing moment, he takes questions

from audience and this I believe he looked like grad student or I don't know his typical Strauss or Catholic type, academic, aspirant, intellectual, asks him something along the lines of, well, we believe ideas have power and ideas and ideology determines politicians' views. And Borjas does not take this, he just corrects this case bitch and it gives him numerous example of even Hillary Clinton but also many other politicians, both Republican and Democrat, many of them arguing for immigration restriction and doing so very recently in the 2000s and even in the 2010s. So you know, it's not about the ideas because they pretend to have the same ideas and morality as everybody else about this. He says obviously they must think they gain some political advantage from promoting immigration

while claiming not to. So imagine trying to advocate for laws and for policies with these kind of people or trying to convince them of something, of believing in your cause of this. This whole occupational class is trash. It needs to be replaced. And I don't know by who. Maybe they would have needed civil service reform, maybe, but Trump maybe could have replaced it with Maga Moms and with the Catholic working class men from Cleveland and rural Massachusetts and so on. Are you mad? You mad at this proposal and now some Hispanic working men too? They could do it. Now, how you speak to this group is important in America and it may well decide not just demographic destiny and therefore future of this country but whether it will continue to lash out around the world like a losing lunatic.

Like Ted Cruz apparently wants to do. He wants to lash out around the world, as you just saw, Ted Cruz. He gave up his whole domestic wishes to sanction Nord Stream Pipeline Europe, the typical story of any establishment Republican. So what can I say? I try to joke, but I miss very much my friend Knight Errant, who is a fighter, also I think thinker into the beyond, into the mysticism of Tolkien and many interesting Catholic things that I did not know this world of theology and so on. He introduced me and he understood all these deeper and higher things too. But now I ask friends to come back to Twitter and other place to honor him and to continue his fight. That's how you honor him and also to save your church from interlopers and with this

then also to be able to save America and the world from Trani Empire with Tomahawk cruise missile. Very good. I will be right back. show, did you know that soy is a protease inhibitor? It's a mild one, but I hear this through. Soy, protease inhibitor. You can look it. Now what is protease? You hear this now, the new Merck or Pfizer pills for Wuhan flu. They're protease inhibitors, right? Just like the HIV cocktail droogs. So protease, that's going to be a bad thing now for the I trust science moron mom crowd in this and here is problem Protease are very good thing and type of protease which are enzymes that break down proteins And they're used by your body for all kinds of things which is one reason that HIV drugs Actually a very bad side effects. You see people who are on them

They have this sometimes this face and so on and these Merck and Pfizer pills Which are basically protease inhibitor for Wuhan bat grids. Okay. Look look up grids the original name of AIDS So these drugs are extremely poisonous extremely dangerous I say this without any hesitation that you should avoid at all costs taking these for yourself for your children Especially and never to allow these lunatics to prescribe these kinds of pills prophylactically which I'm telling you they will try to do I tell you they want to switch now to this and to say it's prep for straight people and to do this with Wuhan flu what they try to do with HIV AIDS in 1980s but never could do because the disease never left the original risk groups like Fauci was

hoping it would and he was darkly warning America he's on video saying you could catch it in household settings and this type of you know or that straight 19 year old should not raw dog his girlfriend because they were both at risk to get AIDS from having sex. And I think that lie, which is evil lie, is that kind of paranoia that it inspired and hypochondria in people had a lot more to do with the fall in birth rate in the Western world than with abortion or moral degeneracy or whatever you may think. So you know, performative fake trad, performative fake traditionalist on internet, do you know that you actually need intercourse to make bedding, you know this. So anyway, they're trying to do now this new big lie to get, they'll try to get you to

take protease inhibitors, which are actually more dangerous than the pathetic vaccines they have and will actually destroy and mess up your DNA, that the way people claim now Now the vaccines do. By the way, what happened to soccer players and young athletes all over the world? You can have an account on Twitter that could do very well that just shows daily sudden heart attack and similar deaths from this. Is this normal? I don't think it's normal in a 20-year-old, you know, oh, it's just a little heart attack. That's all. You take it. Rittenhouse is just a little beating. It's just a little concussion from skateboard, smash your skull. It's just a little brain damage. You can take it. You're strong, right?

So anyway, these drugs, I'm telling you, are much more dangerous even than the vaccine. So protect yourself from them. But so yes, soy is actually a mild protease inhibitor. Now viruses use protease enzyme in the replication process. But suppressing this element is a very brute, dumb way of trying to control a virus or a disease because your body also uses protease for all kinds of things, right? And for example, indigestion, by the way, if you take any digestive enzymes, you will have seen, oh, they have protease and that's a good thing. Pancreatic elastase or other, your pancreas produces enzymes to digest food, right? Excuse me, they keep attack the throat, yeah. But protein are some of the most problematic components, so-called indigestion, and this,

This is for another time full show, but it's interesting that pineapple Contains one of the most potent known protease the enzymes that break down protein called bromelain And I strongly recommend you eat pineapple the favorite fruit of frog Twitter. My friend studs a bodybuilder He ate a pineapple a day If you eat it You make sure that you eat the core that where the bromelain mostly is in the young green pineapple has more of this than the ripe pineapple, you know if it's too ripe that has less bromelain but in general if you have stomach problem it will actually solve many digestive problems eating this per day and of course bodybuilder eat a lot so they need to take this or take or you can buy the bromelain as an enzyme

ready-made in a capsule and Dr. Best has very potent formulation but I just thought you know is interesting a pineapple is opposite of soy right and pineapple strong protease and soy is a protease inhibitor like grids drugs and Wuhan bad grids drugs now pineapple is to soy as frog Twitter is to normal fags we cut through everything we are protease producing parasites of a dying Empire emitting protease compound that will dissolve all this accumulated trash Trash world. Trash. Let me talk about this garbage for a second. I was, I tell you, recent in Brazil, or I still am maybe, I will not say, and I cavorted with California style sloot, the type who is into detox and yoga, and she was of course a vegan and had always a sloot and this and look, many of you will not like what I will

say for a minute, but please bear with me and hear me out. She as a vegan and her vegan friends, they look healthier than non-vegans in this situation. And I don't like veganism, but they didn't have this poisoned look, you know, you see this poison look everywhere now in other countries too, it's a kind of mongoloid face from inflammation. Now she was pretty careful because of vegans there are two types, there is the fat, sickly Basically John this girl and they eat soy and imitation meat made from soy things and polluted grains and cookie and this. And then there is like this girl who is mostly paranoid about what she ate and into organic and this in the place we went to eat is nothing to soy. When I asked them, they got angry at me.

If I asked if they use soy oil or soy, you know, or any kind of vegetable oil is actually so, you know, some vegans have caught on to this. They're not into soy. They don't use vegetable oil. They didn't serve wheat product either, I think. It was organic, local vegetable based and plantains and roots like taro and cassava, but they understood how to make tasty dish with mushroom and vegetables. I think you see in a moment why I tell you this, I'm not here to recommend veganism. I still think it's unhealthy diet. Mostly vegetables are probably anti-nutrient. But in certain situations, this diet is preferable. It's healthier than the native normie diet, especially when I'm telling you, you have mass poisoning by I think it's pesticides.

It's something much worse than seed oil or whatever you have in mind. So basically, these people by eating organic vegetable and avoiding mass-produced rice, corn, wheat, soy and so on and meat, but they are basically avoiding pesticides and probably other contaminants too. Like beside pesticide, the grain supply in much of the world is contaminated with aflatoxin and ocratoxin and others I mentioned on show before. Simply because of how these things are stored in mass warehouses in dirt. And these are the kinds of toxins produced by varieties of fungus which themselves can cause malaise or cancer or other problems, immune breakdown and so on. But these vegans are avoiding pesticides. So you know, she

She looked normal, healthy looking skin, bright, vital, this normal face, eyes fully open and bright and so on, whereas again so many people I saw and other countries all look poison and meat eaters should be careful because animal products are especially susceptible to be contaminated with atrazine and other pesticide. They accumulate in the fat, in meat, in all dairy products, in egg, and when you compare is to even conventionally grow, let's say, taro or some root like this, these will not really have pesticides, but normie meat will, and grass-fed will not save you, okay? Because if you eat grass-fed meat from Illinois or near to somewhere where water under the ground is saturated with pesticide and other thing, it doesn't even matter if that particular

patch of pasture is legally deemed organic and has not been sprayed in some time, it's still addressing grass because of water underground. And so it's hard to get around this, I'm sorry to say it. You are let's say a normie, especially in third world country where agriculture has been hijacked by Monsanto and their friends and you're eating rice that frankly may be fake and I don't mean just GMO. But in Asia, they have fake rice, fake rice noodle, and things made with formaldehyde and this. But beans that are polluted, so rice and bean, traditional, but the beans are themselves polluted and in my opinion, beans are not even human food anyway. But some highly polluted pesticide meat on the side. An American Norman diet is of course very similar.

Instead of rice bean, they use fake wheat, also heavily sprayed, and parts of Europe also. And you add, of course, to this seed oils, but also basically everything you come into contact with now besides the food, your water, your cookware, your shampoo, toothpaste, all of these have novel compound your recent ancestors had no experience with ever. And many are known carcinogens. You have to be insane to think that a lifetime of that or decades of that will not leave you poisoned or cancerous. In some countries these are banned in the United States and some third world countries widely used. Some people are more susceptible than others, even to a little bit. Now I'm not saying whatever because I think actually my friend, Night Errant, I personally

believed he was maybe poisoned by radiation, but that's another thing for another show. Do you know how many people around Chernobyl got cancer years later and I mean even within hundreds of miles they lived and they said, anyway look I'm saying this entire environment, the food, anything that you live with day to day, you come into contact, your clothes even is cancerous. What is cancer? Why do they say estrogens are female hormone? This major repeat insight that I will keep repeating, the agrochemical and chemical in industries promoted estrogen as a so-called female hormone, which is not correct. It's a stress hormone. It's used all over the body. It's in the gut. It has different functions, and yes, you need it to live. Without it, you die.

But the repeat point is that there are too many estrogens in modern world as consequence of chemical industry pollution, and many pollutants just happen to be estrogens, which is to say stress hormones that promote cell division. why female body has more estrogen, by the way. It's not a female hormone. It's about cell division. The reasons they call it a female hormone is because when you try to warn someone, as many of you may have – I had a friend. I go to eat. He made good foods. He was a restaurant owner. He was a very nice, talkative guy. I tell him, please be careful. You give out all these receipts. You touch the receipts. It's very powerful estrogens. enter your hand even if you wear a glove. And his response was, oh, so what if it's estrogen, you know, you, you can't always

be just, oh, manly man testosterone, right? This is how people think as a result of propaganda advertising regarding what estrogen means. It doesn't mean that. It's not about female or being more or less manly. It's about cancer. When you have cell division uncontrolled, plus on top of these factor, you add psychological stress and the speediness and hyperventilation life, modern condition, you get this situation affect many people, both normies and friends, affects all of us if we live in modern world to some extent, and cancer possibly type of metabolic stress response possible. I say this for another time, but the consequence of this universal trash pollution, the spreading estrogenicity of life. This lead to mass poisoning and actually the vegans and yoga sluts who are wise to all

of this, they avoid also wheat and soy and keep to small organic thing, they are better off than a normie and I have to say even better off than a red pill paleo person if such a person thinks that eating highly polluted muscle meats from atrazine cows is path to health and vigor. So I disagree with Mangan on this. He thinks pesticide is not a big deal, but no, I think your body does not easily deal with things like glyphosate and many other such things. Such things should be illegal. Until then, however, how do you protect yourself? I don't know what to tell you. It's difficult. This is not what show is about. I mean, for example, just a small thing. If you eat Icelandic lamb, that is clean. There are no pesticide use in Iceland.

sheep are free to roam a hillside volcano and this, and they eat boreal grasses and whatever they like, it's very clean. Icelandic lamb is good. And there are parts of America also you have to research. They are not as pesticide-polluted, so they're okay. You have to look where you source your meat. But otherwise, if you stick to wild-caught seafood, for example, you might be safer. But even here, you have to look the large fish, they have mercury So you have to go for smaller fish, cod is okay, sardine and such is okay, mackerel has a lot of mercury, haddock, I don't know. Be careful with haddock because actually many haddock they say wild cod but they are less clean than many fish grown in farm fish because haddock like coastal water and east coast

the United States is full of sewage and so you have fish that feeds on sewage in many cases. It's disgusting. I don't know. So wild caught seafood and shellfish is safer I think. And then organic fruit and vegetable or potato grown even conventional is safe. But I think something like potato because something like that does not take up pesticides by its nature, whereas animal products do. So potato cleaner from point of view of pesticide, does this upset you, I say? I'm just trying to think of ways maybe to protect from mass poisoning, but I have to say I cannot do this on this show, how to protect you as individual. I'm not really sure fully what advice given on this. This is not point, right? So in other words, it's not like I'm saying here to follow this advice and you will not

get sick, because you can do everything right and still get sick and do everything wrong and be like Trump who, he eat Big Mac, Coca-Cola Big Mac, but he has more energy than 20-year-old into his old age. But there is the point, it's not about being exceedingly neurotic to try to avoid contaminants because largely you won't be able to, no matter how hard you try, although maybe you Maybe you should try, but in fact to give you practical advices on this as an individual, I will try to invite someone who knows more about it than I do, to invite on show. Maybe like Ray Peet himself or Menaquin on 4 if you will come, they know a lot about this and can give practical advice. But I'm saying here, I'm talking about national level, the short term thinking of, okay, this

food is cheap, it fill you fast, eat cheap, you know, you buy now, buy cheap, this is Chinese mind, it's not ultimately cheap because as the snob Alice Waters, nevertheless she rightly say, you pay for it on the other end in healthcare cost, which you see now when you compare a nation like Japan, which cares about its own people, and has generally clean, good food supply, so if you go to a place like Japan or parts of Europe, other parts of Europe are badly polluted, by the way, in certain part East Europe and so on. But you go part of Europe or to Japan, you don't need to be neurotic like this. All the food is clean. And Japan has no obesity, has longest life expectancy in the world. And when you

compare Wuhan situation to obese America, you compare it to Japan and you see the predictable result and the enormous costs of this kind of short-term thinking. By the way, Korea Korea and Japan had very similar COVID curve in deaths and cases and so on. And Korea, however, now has far more deaths than Japan does and the only difference because Korea also has clean food and good food traditions and not an obese population. However, Korea much higher death rate and only big difference between the two is Korea is much more vaccinated than Japan. Sorry to tell you this must be emphasized. No, sorry drumps. The vaccines are terrible at the very least They're useless, but they're much worse than that. But I I mean even replacing tobacco with snacks, right?

This is what they did with the banning of tobacco and I think it ends up being more costly because obesity is bigger risk factor Than smoking maybe someone should do, you know cost-benefit study What is health cost of one cigarette versus health cost of taking that break and having a snack instead? Obesity more risk than being a smoker, right? So I think with other variables, maybe if smoker also exercise, I don't know. But right, this is about national short-term thinking plus everything I'm saying now would be considered essentially racist. So you're not allowed to fret the way I'm doing now about clean, wholesome food because if you listen to them, they have this phrase, we have to feed the world. And what this means is food science, so-called, how you turn cheap corn, cheap canola oil

and fake flavoring into Frito or other so-called snack, cheap plentiful calories, how you make cheap plentiful calorie palatable from trash ingredients. So soon, as you know, they will introduce insect and soylent and ultimately recycle humans also. Why not? And they push this very aggressive with stock line. If you ask for clean ingredients, they have entire arguments ready. You see shills on Twitter and Fortune and other, they come and how you cannot feed the world that way, which is a bit of a bizarre thing for someone to say because I was not aware that there is a central global food distribution and that you are called on as a citizen to feed the world. What this means, I thought the market was supposed to take care of this by catering

to people's hunger of different kinds and to their preferences which are diverse. Some people like to buy one thing, if other people want to buy those trash they can, right? But this gives you a clue about who is doing this propaganda. Just from a free market point of view, why would somebody care if there's a market for organic or hyper-organic even? But this actually, who is pushing this is competitor of small producers. It's big agribus propaganda to attack their market competitors, or what they see as a threat to their marketing model of selling trash in huge quantities, which they can only make a margin if they sell mass. So they try to make you feel racist and guilty about having a high living standard and not wanting to eat out of a trash can like a pin oil laborer in Riyadh.

And they did similar things before in American history recent with propaganda against coconut oil. It was plentiful in America before 1940s and cinemas in 40s. Popcorn was made in coconut oil and they replaced it with seed oils which are basically a useless by-product of the chemical industry prior to that they had been used for paint varnish and such things. But they began a war of demonization on coconut oil and saturated fats and so on with many other things and it had nothing to do with feed the world or your health but with one industry spreading lies about another and ultimately using political power and threats to get their way. So what about, okay, I don't know, consider if some nation beside Iceland or New Zealand,

and I don't know about New Zealand if they are clean throughout, people say they are, but it's an Anglo nation and Anglos, they love pesticide and food science, but I hear it's clean, but consider if some nation beside New Zealand or Iceland committed, you know, we will grow clean meat and export it. And I think with this mass poisoning in most countries, if this phenomenon becomes widely known, they could all have this, some country who produce this, they say Bhutan, they say we become organic, they could have big market, they could do very well. I mean if Pfizer and Monsanto don't nuke them and drone strike them through somebody like Ted Cruz and don't get all their detractors banned from social media and so forth, which is what a lot of this banning is about.

What do you think, by the way, the Koch attacks on me or frog Twitter are about? What do you think it's about? But I think, yes, some nation with rich pasture lands even was to say, we will not put industrial xenoestrogens on our grasses and the milk is the lifeblood of the nation. I saw a Hindu poster about this. Milk runs in the rivers of the nation and the river of body in veins of blood. America is an Aryan Hindu nation to live on milks. And I believe this. Get rid industrial agriculture, have pasture land for cows, sheep and goats also. Take their milks and feed your nation milk and dairy and occasional clean meats also. And also egg and such. What do you think? No need for pesticide or GMO or any of this. This is in the Bible, by the way.

There is line in the Bible, you can feed yourself and your entire family and healthy on goat milks only. It's in the Bible. So you see, you must do this. I only follow the Bible. I do what King James Version tell me, okay? This passage from Bible, I think it's in Ecclesiastes, I don't remember, but will allow for establishment of milk bars in every city for nourishment and health of the people and many cafes also. Why not promote national health reclamation based on this? In Cambodia, the dictator of Cambodia, he used tanks, he used tanks to bulldoze karaoke bars because he saw karaoke was a threat to the people and I would bulldoze any bar that That serve oat milk or canola-polluted fake milk made from fake almonds or this.

If you want to be a Moissanokian and live on nuts and nut bread, you can go to North Turkey. Okay, it's in Xenophon and the Basis. You can look it up. He described, Xenophon described people live there north of Armenia somewhere in that time. They were pale and fatly people with tattoos, cover arm, and they live on bread made from various nuts, the Mosinokians. You like that, you go live there with the Armenians or in Trebizond. America, by contrast, is Hindutva, Christian milks-loving nation, Guenon. I will be right back. Enjoy Rachmaninoff. I am told Jay Z is heavily influenced by Rachmaninoff. This is what informations I have. He is influenced by Rachmaninoff leader, by song. And that Rachmaninoff, one of leaders in innovation of hip-hop's genre, one of its creators.

Negro spirituals of the Volga River. This long tradition in that nation, Russia, Africa, in the Arctic. I want to say a word to the Catholic if I am not too presumptuous as an outsider. I am not one like Integralist DC to say, hello fellow Catholic, I have just converted to your religion two years ago, now you do what I say, I am your doctrinal leader. You know what I am, I don't hide my beliefs, I put article in American Sun if you want to search on old and new paganism, there is temple in Antarctica, so I do not, you know, That said, I may have soon on show a certain man, a real Catholic in old style, and I don't want to say his name yet, who knows if you'll agree to come in the end. And by the way, do not hold it against anyone who uses faith and lives under own name in

public world, if they don't want to come on my show, by the way, I don't want to compromise anyone. I'm, you know, dangerous show, but my show is not really designed to be guest show anyway, as you know. But this man, if he does come, it will cause a mass chimp out. It will cause, without exaggeration, international gnashing of teeth. We will see if he does. But men like Knight Errant and his friends, I consider my allies in fighting the kingdom of darkness and we can put any doctrinal differences behind us because we have enemy much more important and you should be skeptical of anyone who wants to emphasize sectarian differences between Christians and to put that in front of fighting the enemy of our time. If you want to see true, real idolatry, it is the regime idea of our time.

And I want to tell you two things about problem in Catholicism, in particular, as I see it from outside, but in all Christian denominations, at least in America, which are all corrupted and I speak to other Catholic friend today and he explained to me, you already know maybe, but he explained what these churches have become. You are, I'm sure, aware of Nietzsche's attack on Christianity. And I think whether it is true or not, it's become practically half-truth, a practical half-truth at least in our time, because many believing Christians are wonderful people who are our allies, but the Christian denominations, the establishment of the major churches, their entirely corrupted by the liberal regime. And this includes those who present themselves as post-liberal integralists and such.

Amy Kumar Barrett with her important Haitian kids, right? That's not Christianity. That is not Catholicism, they're Africa obsession. These people are hardcore regime loyalist believers who use Christianity as a front and worse still, in the case of a fool like Amy Coomer Barrett, they're not even aware of it themselves. She actually thinks she's being a good Christian. They're not aware they're the real idolaters and pagans. And meanwhile, they want to focus on the supposed threat of the two or three Nietzschean vitalists on the internet, like me, and people who make jokes on the internet, or who write some is that we are the real danger at the door of Christianity, while they worship instead the idols of Holocaust and of African salvation. Disgusting! When God shows himself to Moses,

Moses goes to the top of Zion Mountain to receive laws, and God says, I'm proud of my gay son. That right there is your Christianity today for you. I spit on this. And I'm not talking about, as you know, the believing Christians, like the friend I spoke to today, or the knight errant. I'm talking about the church leadership, the major establishment of Lutheranism, Catholicism and so forth and I would persecute these fake Christians severely I would then be celebrated by the way by real Catholics for centuries They will say he was like another Torquemada for us You know the Inquisition was designed not to persecute the local knish dealer, by the way Whatever you may have heard. It wouldn't have been knishes, right? It would do you know what Aleira is? It's It's delicious. It's

A Portuguese sausage, it's made originally from bread, garlic, the name Aleira means like garlicky, it made with bread, garlic and chicken and which is then hung to be cured, you know, like normal sausage and it was designed by Jews who were quote unquote forced to convert although in Portugal it was very nominal forcing to convert and they continued to eat kosher And so they made kosher sausages and, you know, they pretended that they were pork sausages and so forth. So this is the story behind this. It's a kind of Marano dish, but has become one of the national dishes of Portugal. Now it is made, I believe, with pork. But the other ingredients have stayed the same, is very good, nice lunch meal.

If you go to any Portuguese neighborhood restaurant, they will have aleira, either bake or fry, I like it fry, with french fry and egg, fried egg. Very filling working class lunch, but everybody eats it in Portugal. But yes, so its origins are supposedly this as a Marano type food where nominally converted Jews had to pretend all were making sausages too and were not really keeping kosher and so on. So anyway, it wasn't the purpose of the Inquisition to find out who was eating kosher sausage, okay? In Portugal, if you read story of the so-called forced conversion, it was wink wink nod nod. No, the purpose of Inquisition in Spain was to root out subversives like vermin mule within the church hierarchy who came into, they became priests or such and they wanted to change church doctrine in

Spain. That's why Inquisition and Torquemada became active there. So anyway Pope Faggot, right, he's trying to ban traditional Latin mass now. So why is this Jesuit ex-bouncer homo, why he tried to do this? Because they do not want traditionalist priests to be able to educate successors, deacons and others like this, he's trying, in other words, to clean them out of church hierarchy. He's trying to stop their own educational channels so that there cannot be a next generation of traditional priests who practice Latin mass. Did Catholicism ever plan on having the Vatican captured by a coven of sectarian homos, communists in this case, by a sect? This interesting And of course, the integralists in America, the ones in Washington, D.C., the showy performative

Catholic converts, they cannot stop taking losses, you see, they are ultramontanists. This means, roughly, you could think of just, they believe in papist supremacy, they are ultramontanists of papist, supremacist variety. In other words, to them, this pope in particular actually is a godsend because they can hide their Marxism under the mask of Catholicism very easily with him. They're not like French traditionalist monarchists who see this pope for what he is, an imposter. But just from point of view of an outsider, right, if you look at Catholicism and take this question of the banning of the Latin mass and many similar measures of not just this pope, but in the recent decades, the way Catholic Church has changed.

But if you look at point of view from outsider, right, what are advantages and disadvantages as a religion to attract converts, and also by some reasoning to preserve the intensity of your own believers? I may not be a Catholic, but I've thought about this question of conversion for a very long time in many different ways. How did Hassan Isabah, the Fatimid Ismaili founder of the Assassin's sect, how did he take the fortress Alamut from where after that he carried out his teachings and he kept his library there and he carried out other operations too? But how he took it and he converted the people by the fortress. I believe it was a two or three-year venture, if I remember right. And then the fortress fell to his followers easily. And I was thinking, what would that be like today?

It's so odd, right? I mean, if you had asked this question in 1820, I think it would have been older than today. Obviously, you cannot do this with any of the major religions today. You go into a place and you get people hot for whatever, Buddhism, Christianity, Judaism, Islam. Yeah, you cannot convert them even to ISIS type Islam. You can't just go into a valley and do that and then take a fortress. Even I would say among the Muslim population that would be extremely difficult. What faith would be capable of when you could do this? So in 1820 I think would be an even stranger question than today because today we have example of 20th century where communism was like this. So it's not as odd to us.

I mean, communism was a violent, intense political religion that was, you know, you would have been capable of doing this as a communist agent to take a neighbourhood, to convert the neighbourhood, to take the police station, to convert the population, take fortress, take villages in Vietnam, take of course intelligence reports and this to turn people with one faith very fast, very powerful. People forget. blame the Cold War conservatives as much as some of you do when they believe in propositional nation lie. Because the Cold War was a little like this and it encouraged this kind of thinking. It was very unusual time human history. Very rarely this happens where actually you had an ideological or religious struggle to

extent where anti-communist sides sometimes had deprogramming camps in Vietnam and other place which weren't quite actually concentration camps where you force people with torture and this, but they were literally a rehab center, reeducation center to gently make targets, recover from communism cult and of course the other side had the other. So this unusual in human history as such a political force, I mean it always exists somewhat a little bit, but nothing that trumps every other national loyalty, traditional loyalty, a new revolutionary faith, a struggle like this. So you cannot fully blame people who came up during that time for getting a distorted view of political life that it's about this, as opposed to say national loyalties or kin

loyalties or other things that are more constant, normal and universal in history and more stable in human nature. But again I was thinking what would be that like today, could such a faith still exist? Communism obviously, Marxist-Leninism incapable of performing this. Even okay, you grant the Maoist, the small Maoist group in Central America or in Peru, but it doesn't really work. And some of you think wokeness is this new religion, but right to me it's obvious how much it isn't by comparison to this aspect, among others. But this, you cannot go into country X and take neighborhood Y or nearby center or police center or fortress with woke ideology. You can't even do that actually within America, but the idea you could go to Kazakhstan or Nairobi and do that is absurd.

So it's obviously not a new revolutionary religion capable of inspiring that fervor. It's a defensive epiphenomenon by a small class of functionaries in America which feels its power threatened by manifestations like Trump and Bolsonaro and Salvini and other such things around the world, so they astroturf this fake wokeness and mobilize a few tens of thousands of their... they're not even true believers, they're the kind of people Kylo Rittenhouse hunted down, rightly he did, ex-cons and this, which their activities are then amplified by a media that they own, but it's incapable of moving people like Marxist Leninism did, not to speak of the fact that I've known people who had committed old Bolsheviks of that type, and there is no comparison to the leaders of the so-called woke movement.

Many of those people were serious, intelligent. I do not want to get into it. They were made of something that you do not see today anywhere. The hardcore, let's say Stalinists of the 1930s and so on. There's nothing like those kinds of men among the woke. But I mentioned Trump, Bolsonaro, Salvini. I do not mean to say that these either are what I'm talking about, right? I mean, that loose ideology, if you can even call it that, also would not be able to command the fervor, the persuasive, world-changing conversion of such a faith, like Hassan-i-Sabah spread, or Marxism, or Maoism. Maoism less so, but certain few other things like this. Early Christianity was the same, and sectarians within religions that, whether it's sects of Shiite Islam, not just Ismailism,

but new sects that come up within Christianity also, in Middle Ages, certain Anabaptists when they arrive, when they first arise, for example, or among the Jews later, certain Frankist sects and so on. New faiths that can inspire this fervor, where you can actually go and you take a city, you can go and you corrupt a government bureaucracy very quickly, and I've always wondered, what could be something like this today? keep asking you and since 1999 I see conservatives first they thought it was Islamic radicalism but that too I think is only a half expression of this and now they think wokeness is which just is not and I'm deeply concerned with this question on personal level because I myself want maybe to be able to devise such a faith now my book if I can say so with some

pride, it does inspire great devotion among readers and excitement, but it's not this type of thing yet because it's not, and I'm not saying this to be a snob, but it is not a people's book. It was not designed to be that and it can't be that. It's not normally book. I wrote Bronze Age Mindset, which is kind of joke title, but I wrote it for a few hundred of my friends. I did not really think it would expand beyond that. And maybe in that sense, if you want, you can think, okay, it's a book for party core, but it's not manifesto for public political action like Marxism and Leninism can do to revolutionize masses and not just masses, but they're centurions and lieutenants on grassroots local level where you can have party mobilization. In my book, there's no practical political program.

The end part is somewhat tacked on because I wanted to give general guides to actually variety of paths for political action for our side, but I've even seen leftists say they could follow some of those, which are common sense advices in this. Anyway, but enough about this, I've thought, I wrote my book, especially the first parts for friends, and I thought its words would even be unfriendly to normal people. some strange, I don't want to explain what it is, but think if something is Nietzsche and Vajrayana type philosophy, it does not work for political public program like that. But what would it take to design this public faith capable of revolutionary conversion of masses and regions? And this question maybe I do show, entire show one day, just on this, because it's question

with many mysteries, very many profound things. You could take doctrine of a religious teacher in Christianity and think, what would it take for him to propagate his faith in the world? You can take question of somebody like Plato and think, what did he have to do that? Maybe I do show on this actually is subject for a book or two books. But on this one question, what would the faith like this look today in all in the past, all All such doctrines, and for example, Khazarism is another sectarian revolutionary ideology you could say, or philosophy or religion that came about medieval Europe, quickly converted many people. But all of these, many others have a certain thing in common. They are antinomian and they are either violent or they glorify violence being done to oneself.

And sometimes both, as in Hassan Isabah. But you need at least the latter. You need to glorify violence being done to you, as the early Christians did. You need people and priests willing to martyr themselves and to suffer publicly for their cause because even if you're not violent, if you're new and the revolutionary truly so like this, the state and others will do violence to you. And in all cases, there is then a confrontation here in these new revolutionary political religions with suffering and blood. So I'm wary of this, you know, encouraging my readers and such to be martyrs, even peaceful martyrs who are ready merely to suffer. How could I take that on myself or you? Could you do that? Because any genuine faith based on things I say in book, which again is a kind of Nietzsche

doctrine, but its bearers would have to be able to suffer terrible persecution. It would not be legally allowed to exist. And if you take it to the people, I mean, in a manifesto program, then, okay, and then if you try for mass conversions and political programming, then you would have martyrs. And I don't know, I don't think this is possible with all doctrines to do, right? I mean, imagine asking to make a revolutionary religion out of Rawls' theory of justice. It sounds like a joke, what do you get? But actually I think you would get something ridiculous like this woke movement, this contrived post-modern joke version of what I'm talking about, like nobody's dying for wokeness, not even their hardcore fanatics.

And it's the astroturf simulated religious paroxysm of the lawyer government and of the Podesta political operator class, it's absurd. But you know why I say this? For early Christianity, the glamour of the martyrs, the glamour, men who sought out persecution, who wanted to fight. And I talked to other Catholic friend recently, he tell me this, that Saint Augustine talk about this. He say, men who have families, we can make exception for them, they are in a position of relative weakness. But the priests, there is no excuse for them not to fight and not to martyr themselves. But this fervor, this readiness to be persecuted was a major attraction to the people and to others, to intelligent people also. I'm not saying to the people to be a snob, it was attraction to smart, elite people as

well. But this, it fascinated the sufferings of the saints, their fanaticism, their persecution helped to convert others. It is the reason the Pope wears red shoes in memory of the blood of martyrs. But imagine this meek mouse of a Jesuit bureaucrat and schemer. Isn't this man standing ready to martyr himself for the faith? How absurd! But so the question is, after Christianity, revolutionary martyr establishment, after the faith is already established, how does it continue propagate itself? And what do I see as outsider, as Catholicism in particular, its advantages and disadvantages? Okay, in beginning you see in movie Silence, they have glory and glamour of martyrdom. But then, let's say now, what comes now, let's say I'm looking okay to convert to some denomination

of Christianity, excuse me, I'm looking let's say to pick and choose, okay, I like music of Bach. To me, personally, that is evangelical activity makes you want to become Lutheran, right, but what is Lutheranism today anyway? But it's not new thing that I say for Catholicism, but this attraction after the martyrdom phase It's a pump, it's a mystery, the beauty of the rights and the buildings, the way it incorporated European classical tradition of beauty and helped further it and became a patron to it. It's glamour, the secondary glamour, not the one of Martin, but the aesthetic one was one of its main selling point, if not the main one, if I can put it in this crude way. Many say so is not the original point.

Camille Paglia says this too, and she says it's sad that in America, Catholic churches, they were embarrassed actually by this opulence and this kind of aristocratic traditionalism and they started to copy Protestant churches in their dourness and their simplicity and IKEA style in this, and so it lost one of its main attractions. But you can see how big of a loss this is when you consider Catholicism drawbacks, which she doesn't talk about. I haven't seen too many talk about, but it's obvious drawbacks, you have to be honest. Because if I'm looking, for example, to convert somebody saying, let's say somebody grows up not atheist, but okay, they were Christian of some kind, but never really practicing and they're looking to become religious now, right? So they want to seek a denomination.

And if you want something new, right, and what about Calvinism? Not what gets practiced now, but in original form or the fiery Afrikaner Calvinism or this type of thing. And evangelical Christianity also, which similar, have certain advantages if you're a new convert, right? It's very simple. It's the Bible. It's the Bible itself. It's the simplicity of studying the Bible. It's the fervor of the direct belief, whereas in Catholicism you have these drawbacks, which is the bureaucracy. And that's a drawback. It's the hierarchy of the church, the bureaucracy. Then also what's this, a catechism and these other things on top of the Bible which look laborious and odd, you know, it smells like Talmudri, various layers of tradition outside of the teaching of the Bible directly.

These are all drawbacks, you know, submitting yourself to weird authorities, some foreign guy in another country who has ultimate say and these other guys who are these lieutenants under him and this it's all rather you know if you're not a gay guy who's suppressing your gayness and you know these types of things are not really attractive about Catholicism if they are drawbacks and you know what any of this with this hierarchy has to do with salvation of the soul, with the Bible or the passion of Jesus, is not clear to a potential Christian convert. Look, these aren't good selling points, so to speak, for Catholicism. These are weaknesses. And it made up for these weaknesses by many bounds on the other side. It made up for it with its glamour and its mystery.

But they got rid of that and kept the drawbacks. So what's left are the disadvantages. And populations in the past converted, you say, well, how did they convert entire nations? Well, outside of the Mediterranean, they converted because they had to, you know, the king converted and so forth and the people with him and on the village level, it wasn't really, it didn't work in the way it does today and so forth. And even in Spain, you know, why was actually there so much outburst, violent outburst against the church by the left in the 1930s? It's because the church was perceived as having allied with the landowners and the hated state system and so forth, which had to be destroyed from point of view of the left and so on. They are viewed in other ways.

The church was viewed as a kind of political branch, you know, but without being able to offer kings political incentives for national conversion and without force and without its martyrs and without now also the main carrot of glamour and mystery, why would anyone but a kind of pervert want to arbitrarily submit himself to some homo Jesuit in Rome who furthermore kisses Korans ostentatiously and kisses the hands of Rothschilds and the feet of Africans and to this whole alienating bureaucracy alongside him and impenetrable residues of tradition which when it's denuded of all its magnificence and mystery is not something attractive. It's a drawback. Why not then just evangelical spiritedness? It makes more sense.

It doesn't at least have those drawbacks, which actually is why Latin America and many other places, Catholics are losing believers to evangelicals. So this is a big problem I see as an outsider, if I may, but one who has thought for a long time about conversion and many such related matters. And I don't have time to tell the whole story here of why I think Catholicism and also other establishment Christian denominations are just, you know, they're committing suicide top down. And a friend tell me today, he's not like me in religion, he's as believing Catholic as you can find. And we are talking today about Knight Errant because he was his friend too. And this, he told me on the phone that in just any of these mainstream churches, especially

something like Lutheran, where they introduce female pastor or this type and you know, once Once you do that, there is nothing, there is just nothing. Spiritually, nothing is left in that after you bring in a female pastor. Nobody even attends the Lutheran Church, for example, anymore. Nobody goes. So it's used as a kind of immigration promotion center, and it's used as a center for homeless youth, you know, some of who become trans, and they turn tricks on street and this kind of vagrant thing and the church becomes a kind of community center or residence for them. I'm seriously telling you this is what many of Lutheran-type churches in America have become. And this immense spiritual and doctrinal emptiness is then, as I tell you, replaced with Africa.

Drive for food in Africa, drive to support African businesses and industry, African immigration. It's all about Africa now, in all big churches, Catholic or not, it's their establishment, that basically centers for African development in the same way that some year ago I walk in front Episcopalian church and you know, it had Hindu dance troupe in the afternoon so it becomes some kind of bizarre ecumenical cultural performance center. In other words, nothing. And in that nothing comes Holocaustianity and Wuhan worship and Woke and Africa worship and I'm proud of my trans son. And the Africa thing, by the way, is especially cruel because the African population is already at this level as it is now, not quote-unquote sustainable by their own agriculture or industry or any.

It can only survive with foreign imports. Same, I believe, population of Egypt, and that's not even sub-Saharan Africa, but it It was 100 years ago, 2 million I think, or 3 million, and now if I'm, maybe it's 80 million, and something like three-fourths of its food has to be imported and subsidized by the government. You cannot sustain these populations, but these feminine men who run these churches, they're either feminine men or they're under the rule of their women, and it's incredibly cruel to keep promoting population growth in a place like Africa. But they do not think this. They don't think it's cruel. They think it's a kind of Christianity to promote this insanity. And the integralists that you see on Twitter, by the way, most of them are not very far from this.

The leftist Catholics online, of course, but also the integralists, as they say, the people around vermin Mueller and Washington DC intellectual Catholics many of who are converts it's also all about Africa African immigration feed Africa need 2 billion Africans who cannot feed themselves brings them with a machete in their heads let's rub my chaiwala wash their feet while I watch it okay let the homo Rob Dreher talk about African genitalia he does this in an article primitive, rude, wiener, I don't know what mean, let Amy Kumar adopt Africa to show she's better than Angelina Jolie. In this emptiness steps, in other words, the religion of victimization and of female vanity, which is the real religion of modern regime.

And it was against this terrible turn that Knight Errant and all my real Catholic friends are fighting to save their own religion. And it should be an example, I think, also to others. I hope the Protestants also can bring back something like Afrikaner type Calvinist revival to America. But that is for them to do. I don't interfere with this. I am instead plotting and thinking, should I publish manifesto? I think only I could do it, but maybe I don't. Maybe I do something else. But what would it be? A new antinomian karpokratism of nature? Do you want this? Maybe you are scared. I will see. But until next time, I wish you a happy new year and yes, OK, very good, I am on my way to Vatican to reclaim the diadem. Very good. BAP out. Until next time.