Welcome Caribbean Rhythms, episode 107. This one, various art movies I enjoyed, which I promise you, but first, there is big news all week. From around the world tonight, Elon Musk, worldwide excitement, he by Twitter, someone say, this feels very much like 2016 election night, the general excitement, the joy in seeing the wailing and gnashing of teeth, the agony of people who really are upset that Musk might end some of the censorship, very bizarre. We will see how far he go, but I tell you, the excitement is not only among our insane quarter of internets or even among the MAGA people. Many MAGA people got banned, not just Trump. Swades and swades of Q supporter and this got banned. They are anticipating a return, but excitement not only among them, but I have sources in Silizog Valley,

and all of them tell me, Musk buy of Twitter feels like it might reestablish the spirit of Silicon Valley. This what they tell me. I will not say who, but there's actually more than one person tell me this, because you must understand they are not liberal freaks. They are liberals, but they're not freaks. They are not woke and they are very much against censorship actually, I think even Jack from Twitter is. What you might call techno libertarians, in their personal lives, they are liberal. This fine, I don't care. They support actually free speech, which all that should matter to us. But their own companies and all of Silazog Valley got hijacked by adventuracies. These are women who go and spout pseudo-critical theory-sounding, they use the language of

Baudrillard and Derrida and so forth to sound off on technology. And for whatever reason, I can't understand why even Musk or such people, they pay very large salaries to essentially these adventurous women who become court jesters in Scirizog Valley and provide commentary on technology. But they're not the worst of it. The worst are the woke political people they hired in the early 2010s, and they thought it would be okay, but their own companies got hijacked by them, Twitter most of all. And then from the other side, they are oppressed by government. No matter what, you may hear big tech, big company rule America, no they don't. You have seen repeated Democrat senators bullying, intimidating Mark Zuckerberg and many others,

forcing them to censor, asking them, Mr. Zuckerberg, how come you have a trending story on top of your page about Alex Jones? And nobody raised any questions about that interference, not even the Republican senators who actually approve of it, but they can't admit it. And they approve of it because they are under more threat than the Democrats from us. The Democrats think they can survive us, but the Republican senators know they can't. There is no market for Romney style or Bill Kristol style or what they call Reagan style. many more. It has no takers. This guy, Crystal, has, what, a one million follower and he barely gets any engagements. They all are followed by massive botnets. You want to talk Russian

bots? They are actually literally Russian bots. Their followings, Neera Tanden and Bill Crystal who, some of them are already crying about seeing a decrease in their follower count. I'm guessing some of the bots got shut down immediately. Why do I say they're Russian bots because it was always a stupid phrase Russian bot is like saying that you are using a Russian technology if you use Kaspersky anti-virus well is same with Russian bots they are designed in Russia but they're used by businesses by politicians and media companies and all kind of people and a lot of the as I was telling you the Republican side especially Actually their follower counts are fake, inflated, the whole NRO National Review conservative intellectual biome, many of them have fake followings.

So anyway, these people are all gnashing their teeth tonight, they were all party to the mass censorship that has gone on in America. Actually before Trump came on scene, many of us were getting banned even before 2015. talked about. It accelerated, of course. But this old problem, censorship in Silisog Valley, and it feels now some people, high people in that region, are writing me to tell, they have high hopes that, and they know, and I tell you now, that Musk will make mistakes. He will not know what he's doing sometimes, and we should all cut him slack and wait to see what happens. The censorship problem won't be solved overnight, even if he has perfect intentions, and I don't know what his intentions are, but won't be solved overnight.

For now, I advise friends to have this attitude put up a sign, nothing to see here, move along. Do not deactivate, even though I think Twitter employees might take this opportunity to retaliate preemptively but you know don't sound off either at least for a week or 10 days or so to see I don't even know is Musk in control of company yet I see Alex Jones he make petition to be reinstated I don't even know if Musk in control of company yet I don't want to pour cold water on it is great to see the ghouls who knows that their lies cannot survive without extreme censorship, it's great to see them gnash and wail and so forth. That part is undeniable, but how far, look, some people say he will deny ability to have non-accounts. There's no such thing, you cannot deny people that.

He can demand you upload an ID, but then there will be businesses in India and Philippines Indonesia with just a peasant there will sell you that fake ID, you can upload the picture. They will not use KYC or know your customer type thing like a bank would. Whatever he uses will be very light, you know, and if he demands a subscription service, I think this is good. I would pay, you know, would you pay $1 a month for Twitter access? I think that's a good idea and it would – imagine seeing some of these journalists or Coca-Cola company or somebody, they have four million followers, 300,000 followers, I am internet heritage society, I have 300,000 followers, you know, they get one like on a tweet, you know, this is not true, it doesn't happen.

But other bad things happen on news also, Macron win, you saw this, it will be continuation, it was predictable, Macron win in France, you know, the Katamite for African men, it's a continuation of proxy rule over France, quasi-proxy rule, because McKinsey and Goldman Sachs are essentially their own bureaus within the French government, and they have this this weird fagged macron who is, look, he's documented, he's a known gay, which is fine if he was gay openly, but why he hiding behind the beard of this demented-looking, she doll-like hag, the old woman, his supposed wife, when everyone knows he's into hot Algerian cock, okay, his bodyguard, Benalla, I don't know how you pronounce that, his bodyguard just get massive benefits,

He passes permits for government services that he had no right to. It was a big scandal in France, I've talked before and you can look this up, but it's a Roman Emperor-tier type thing where Elagabalus who, you know, he got strangled by the Praetorian Guard in the bathtub because I don't want to get into this, but these are the wages of having a deleted population, a bunch of selfish, piss-dry olds ruling France and every other European country, actually, which is the ultimate cause of all of these problems. The rule by the old. And very few, believe me, saw the full problem before the Wuhan restrictions came. But now they see. And Macron again, unfortunately, was expected. I was hoping for a surprise. And maybe you see that neither I nor even French friends, however, over the last few

weeks, we have not been excited over memeing for this Le Pen woman because she's just such a loser. She's herself a dour, middle-aged woman, drowning on about social justice and irrelevant things. The washer woman, Le Pen, she's confused. She dropped the one or two matters that could have maybe won. And these are the migrant matter, immigration in general on one hand, and then Macron's violence against his own people on the Wuhan-Futlu restriction protests. From videos you can see that it's actually safer to be an anti-Russian protester in Kherson, Ukraine than an anti-restriction protester in Paris. And just thousands of people were maimed in Paris by the so-called liberal rules-based world order candidate Macron, and instead of hitting him on these two matters, and look

I know Zemur did try that and Zemur made immigration his priority and he only reached the teens in percentage points in the first round of the vote, but I think Zemur had a problem not with his message because he went from 0 to 15, he had a problem with name recognition in France, he's just too new, maybe. There's not a case like Bolsonaro, where Bolsonaro was actually in public eye in Brazil for decades and he had a percolating presidential campaign from beginning, for years. So I think Zemur did very well, and he has a future politically where the Le Pen family just doesn't. So anyway, Marine Le Pen drops these perhaps winning matters, and in fact you know the The Europopulists like her and Salvini in Italy are so stupid on this.

They dropped all presence of mind complete on this Wuhan restriction, and Macron in this case was basically allowed to pay no political price for really acting as bully enforcer for the fears of the gerontocracy. And he's running as, excuse me, supposedly this young, fresh candidate who will revitalize the young Kennedy face of France, who revitalized France's moribund economy. But how? When he is servant for desires of the most decrepit, the oldest, they had a policy to blind protesters in Paris with ammunition. It was a policy, it was not just one or two accidents. You can search this and see how many people were blinded by extreme violence of French police were ordered to maim people. So Marinelet Penn drops this and instead today, or when was the election? Sunday.

So Sunday she come against the teaching of regional languages like Breton and others in schools, right? So essentially this means that they would be banned in an official capacity, they would slowly decline from public use and then would die out. So even if you believe in this kind of anachronistic 19th century version of nationalism, and why would you by the way, it's responsible for more homogenization, more erasure of local traditions and customs than even globalism is, at least as of now. But let's say you're this kind of carrot in the ass type kind of right winger, you stomp your foot for 19th century nationalism in this way for national unity. Why would you emphasize that point on election day in such a supposedly close race and you

then lose many of the outskirts away from Paris where minorities, I mean traditional minorities like the Bretons live, Bouloret by the way is a Breton, this is the Moore's billionaire backer, but many frog friends online you see are from Brittany, but this is just one example. There are other minorities around France who want to promote their own culture, their own regions. Why would you introduce this other and irrelevant divisive thing on election day? And biggest of all then is her stupidity on economic matters, another stupid distraction. It means that even if she would win one day, and the Le Pen family should just disappear now, but even if she wins, she will have wrecked the reputation of populism because, forgive

if I repeat, Le Pen's signature move has been since before the last election to abandon immigration as signature cause, and move towards this discourse of anti-neoliberalism, anti-corporations, and how a free market supposedly oppresses the – right, the free market, right? Elon tried to buy a company, the free market, and the government begins DOJ investigations on him. That is the biggest danger he faces. They will crush him, they will try to, we'll see how he fights back. That's hyper capitalism for you. Is that how it works? Is it hyper capitalism when the richest man in the world gets crushed by government if he tries to buy a social media company? So she's part of promoting this. Same thing that the integralists in the United States, the free market oppresses the common

man and the pro worker and she's the true vanguard of working class. So she will promote, you know, this wholesome family values type of socialism. In other words, again, what the Santorum people in the United States want. They want to replace Trump with his focus on immigration and demographic with this older Santorum thing, you know, third-worldist socialism with a religious family values flavor. And as there is no urban proletariat anymore, not in any numbers at least since, not like like the 1920s or 30s, what is Le Pen trying to achieve here, beyond appealing to vanity of some political intellectuals who find, you know, just supporting small businessmen and farmers and so forth, they find that unfashionable, and so they want to roleplay as if they're

the true historical cerebral vanguard of the working class. And across the world, it is again small business types that are core of this new populist uprising. It's true in Brazil, in Turkey, in Japan, and to a large extent also in the United States where the people who are behind Trump manga movement, they morphed into that from the Tea Party. It was a lot of middle class women with small businesses and contractors and so forth. And they were in pain under actually excessive regulations that do not hurt big corporations because they're actually written by big corporations together with government to make entry harder to stop competition from smaller players. So Macron was supported by an older electorate than Le Pen.

And if you look on the electoral map, these are just interesting tidbits of French election. If you look on electoral map, Lupin did well in areas with high unemployment. But I think this misunderstood. She did well in those areas. But this misunderstood maybe in the same way United States election won because in America upon Midwest and similar such place, Appalachia, it was not really the unemployed or those on actually on heroin and despair who voted for Trump. It was their neighbors who were in general better off than the average American. Many of them have their own private contracting firms and so forth, and they were concerned about their neighbors and the decline of their communities. And that is probably the typical Trump voter, and I would guess also typical Le Pen voter.

Also the young, again, Macron got the older vote and a lot of younger people voted more for Le Pen. She still lost the youth vote, but by far less than she lost the older vote. She was very competitive in the youth vote. But I'm not doctrinaire on economics, you know, to talk to you about this small business thing or social. I could go either way on it. If she could win on this pseudo-socialist rhetoric, I would be for it. But it's obvious she cannot win. And so first of all, she and her whole family need to fuck off out of French political life. I had a nightmare the day before the election. I wanted to tell you about it. I wanted to record Shou Zen, but they put something in my soup. But I wanted to record Zen because I had a horrible dream of Star Trek.

I was in a Star Trek episode, one of those where they are in the holodeck. This is where the virtual reality holograms and it goes wrong, a training program. You might remember if you're a Star Trek watcher, they have these kind of episodes. And I was in that and Marion Le Pen was one of the detrimental robots, her head turned 180 degrees and she had very wide eyes, frightening look, looked straight into my face from across. It looked like a gigantic gym floor, I was across from it and I started to run from her. This whole family is detrimental, they need to fuck off out of French politics. I know what they are. I know what you are, Marion. So it's not about economics, it's about biology. I don't like this economic concern in politics from intellectuals who imagine themselves

a populist vanguard. It's not about economics, it's about the biology of age on one hand and the biology of race on the other. Because I think problems of our time are a Hutu Tutsi type, a pre-Interahamwe situation, And it doesn't really have much to do with economics or socialism or late capitalism or again any of these things the populist conservative new right likes to talk about and they talk about them because it's safe. There's a sword hanging over the head of America as also France and much of Western Europe. The sword is the fate of Bosnia indefinitely, an indefinite Bosnia, a permanent Bosnia. And it's this importation of minorities who cannot and will not assimilate, who have no reason to assimilate.

Do I repeat myself, I am immigrant to America and I do not come from a Sudanese family, I come from demographics that could in theory easily assimilate, but I must tell you as immigrant to America there was nothing to assimilate to. So when Republican normies talk about assimilation I don't know what they mean, there is no incentive nor model of anything to assimilate anything other than this gay office culture. And then you know it's not, you're not selling your soul for money when you conform to gay office PC culture, which is what political correctness really is, HR, human resources carried in culture. You're not even selling your soul for money then, but really just for a job that promises money often doesn't deliver it.

And it reminds me again of just how off is this whole discourse on economics because Menaquin on four, very right about this, today very hard, basically impossible to build wealth through normal job, to rise up through the ranks to do well or achieve some, forget millionaire, but even economic stability and a good life through normal work, even by middle age. So corporate life today is hell. So the concerns of the mainstream left and the mainstream right and their rhetoric ignores this fact, doesn't talk about the day-to-day humiliations. It's not even just the ideological bullying you have to put up with. That's a symptom of it. It's the toadying, the lip service you have to pay to, oh, synergies, this and corporate talk, the pieties of corporate talk.

In general, to have to pretend that you're not there for a job, but that it's part of your life and identity, which is in part a way they can get to have a claim on your time 24 hours a day, the whole week. And I want to find this, there was a funny interview for an internship with Goldman Sachs by a literal spergoloid. This was going on the internet sometime before 2015. I wish I could find this interview. It's very funny. There was this kid, he was an artist, he must have been maybe 18 or 19. The guy interviewing him was from Goldman Sachs. He sounded like he was 25 or I don't know, this was Skype interview. And it was presented as just this ridiculous of this autist because when he was asked why he wanted an opportunity to intern there, he answered, I want to make money.

When he was asked, what do you see in Goldman Sachs, is they make money. I want to be part of it because I want to make a lot of money. And this was so shocking for his interview, he couldn't contain chuckling and this kind of condescending, you know, unctuous gay intonations that young corporate cock-sockers have now with, um, okay, you know, but what's wrong, this kid was just being honest, yes he was autistic but this partly reason also I couldn't ever get good job because I can't bring myself to go along with this homosexual affectation of office culture where everyone has to pretend that this is not just to pay rent, but that you actually love it and you have to constantly affirm yourself and affirm everyone else to validate that they have made the right decision in life.

And no, no, no, we're not here to pay rent, that's dirty talk, it's dirty. You're not here to pay food for rent, but you're here to develop your skills and synergies in a dynamic, you know how it goes, it's intolerable. So this is what work life is like now, which is terrible. In other words, work sucks now, it always did, but especially in Normies, Normie Republicans especially, they don't want to start from this reality, but from some other fake ones from decades ago, when work also sucked, but you know, you were not spiritually sodomized at office by a fat Harroden and a gay black Urkel. And this is a big reason that the cryptocurrency will keep having runs, unless they completely ban it. Because people don't want to go through that Golgotha excuse of blasphemy, I don't know,

they don't want to go through the spiritual gauntlet passage of so-called hard work today. In many cases they can't, there are not good jobs or the money doesn't end up anymore to where you can build any wealth, so they will keep betting on krapto casino for a while I think. But yes, this is the economics of our time. So you see, no amount of, on either side, pseudo-socialist stomping against capitalist neo-liberalism will change this reality, neither will libertarian, pseudo-libertarian footstomping or any other, which is why the whole Le Pen focus on economics, that she will put some bells and whistles on your slavery. She should focus on stopping Rwanda in France, you know, she's just such a loser, you know,

And the reason Rwanda will happen in France is also ultimately the same reasons that account for terrible and sclerotic work environment, and also the same reason for terrible and decrepit Wuhan restrictions that muzzled so many young people. And another one is the preponderance of selfish, ugly, filthy old people, old who want to suck the life out of the young. Watch David Lynch Mulholland drive, a very vivid depiction of this. My friend, I hope you all subscribe, he writes good substack for a long time now on Wuhan, but he had a few tweets yesterday about this. It captured it perfectly, so I will just read for you what he said about French election. It made him go off. It made him chimp. He said, very depressed about French election. The boomer generation is a plague on the land.

boomer pensioners who have hijacked major EU nations since 2020 to turn it into some bizarre simulacrum of prison-retirement nursing home where they can live out their hygiene fantasies and maximize their life expectancy by two weeks. Fuck these assholes. Fuck them. He right. He completely right. And he continues, I want a world ruled by young, vital men, forward-looking, ambitious, striving after the farthest horizon. Not as he said insurance laden fully hedged retirement nursing home mandatory mask world. What kind of place is this for the young? He complete right this what the American part is this Europe is decent. He said what is happening to us is not a conspiracy. It's a fully legal pensioner coup pensioner coup. That's right. He has it right.

A bunch of olds in the terror of death condemn all of us to two year hygiene prison and in And their terror of penury imports third-worlders to pay their retirement funds and staff their nursing homes. They are destroying the economy, our nations, and our future, but they don't care because they have guaranteed monthly income, they rarely travel or go outside, and they have no interest in what happened beyond 2030. We desperately need to find a way to get them out of power. Is complete right? Another friend adds, it's no coincidence that aging countries like Germany and Italy had the hardest restrictions. This is very true. It's true in, originally, if you go to Spain or Portugal, the parts of Spain or Portugal

that are oldest, like Galicia, they have some of the harshest restrictions since the beginning for the past year. But Madrid was basically open throughout the pandemic because they had a right leaning woman, really the only city in Europe, she is to be commended. But when I was there last year, I was told, oh, you want to go to Galicia, they'll put a muzzle on you even on the beach, you know. But you get, you see, got it. He got it right. That's right. I used to feel sorry for old people. But recently I've been traveling around the world and I confront everyone with facts about masks. I used to leave it alone. I used to say, I'm a guest in the country. I don't want to step on their customers. But you know, it's not like this is a Burkean case where you have to respect their ancient

traditions of masking that they reported last year from the World Health Organization and Dr. Fauci because they believe whatever American authorities tell them to. It's not an ancient custom that you have to respect. It's not established. You can spit on it. And I want to convince people now, I try to see how far I can go. I confront them with facts about masks and many such things to show them it doesn't work. And in Europe, especially last year, I noticed this, that the olds, when I approached them with these, they get abusive. The old start to scream and yell when you confront them on masks. And even in cases where mandates were dropped, Madrid dropped outdoor mask mandates in July of last year, I think.

I was in Madrid before then, I never wore a mask outside, I walked in front of police without a mask, they never stopped me. You don't have to comply even when there's a law. But they dropped the mask mandate on July 1st, I think, and many continued to wear the masks outside. Even some of these old hags become abusive if you go into their stores and don't put a muzzle on, you know. By bails above, I hope that these kids I see now on street with masks, they grow up. I hope they spit on their idiot parents. I hope they grow up to hate you and cast you out, you disgusting old hypochondriac vampires. And it's the same, the same olds who are responsible. You give us in other Europeans who mentioned this, they're responsible, the same people

for mass immigration of orcs into the West because they want to penny pinch and to save a penny and be able to spit on Abdul or Samira when they take out their bedpan and wash the floors of their disgusting, filthy nursing homes. I hope you all get fed to the dogs by the Muslims. You filthy disgust. They are the ones who voted in large numbers, I tell you again, for Macron. As for Biden, if you believe the polls, the over 60s and over 70s in the United States massively voted for Biden, the selfish demented boomers and so on. They cared for nothing. They're willing to flush their children and civilization of thousands of years down toilet if it means just 1% more perceived comfort for themselves, or the delusion that they

can return to stability of the 1990s, which was also a terrible time. So you know, what is the solution? I cannot talk here. I'm not organizer, even if I could talk, but I tell European friends again, if you're maybe 10 to 15 percent of the population, even just that. That is enough to prevail in a crisis if you're organized, but the problem is you're not. And the second problem is if you try to organize, at least in America, you get immediately infiltrated, any overt open organization. But I recommend maybe double pronged tactic where there are some public groups in places where it's relatively possible to do them, like generation identity, and I think that's That's a dumb name for reasons I explained in previous shows, but if you want to just

have public organizations like Generation Identity, or use the cover of an environmental or urban renewal groups, but make them explicitly youth groups and wink, wink, nod, nod, right wing with youth groups, and then just today, by the way, I read that Austrian anti-Nazi regime in the 1930s in Austria, it was a kind of a fascist regime, but anti-Nazi, and they They raised the voting age to 24 in Austria in 1935, because the younger people all wanted, you know, they wanted Nazism. How does that make you feel that the young want that, you know, David Bowie said Hitler was the first rock star, is this true? But anyway, on the other hand, I would say, you can have these public youth organizations, make them cleaned up somewhat and, but then you can have cells, two to three people, people

you know very well, and these very small group, two to three people cannot be infiltrated if they're people you know and trust. And if you have thousands of such cells, let's say 10,000 all over Europe, they could coordinate only the timing is the only thing they would need to coordinate somehow, the timing. And nothing could stop that. You understand what I'm saying? You have to fill in the blanks. But I'm not an organizer. Like I'm one man with a radio show. I'm an entertainer. I'm your clown. Is this true? I'm just your clown. But so this show will discuss other thing. I talk movies again and this excitement of movies because I talk to bureaucrats and some other people. I will not mention who. I don't want to embarrass public people, but people with the ability to make movies and

who can get funding to make some movies, so they are talking to us and we are considering making movie and I wanted historical epic, but that's very expensive to make usually. So maybe we start with tale of urban nihilistic decay and vitality. Did you like this movie, recent movie Nightcrawler? But there are many older arty movies like that, something like that or like Inland Empire, maybe less strange. But we are in talks to do this, will take a while, but maybe we focus on this, you know, because I cannot be the Hezbollah leader of Europe. I tried, but maybe I just make funny movie instead. I will be right back. In emergency breaking news, Elon Musk has given the order, and he has given the order for hundreds of journalist ringleaders.

They have been marked the blue check by the previous Twitter regime. They are to be rounded up, arrested, and executed by hanging at Guantanamo Bay, also known Gitmo military tribunal. Elon was Q all along. No, but I just joke. But obviously, in 200 years, people will be writing books about how Elon's new freedom of speech push on Twitter, there's a direct line from that to the so-called pan-basileia, the Eurasian pan-basileia that, look, I don't want to raise your hopes about this. I don't know what Elon Musk will do. She just enjoys a show of seeing Neera Tanden, she's shitting her pants, just enjoys that. Now as for movies, I enjoy David Lean very much and I start to watch all David Lean movies after A Bridge Over the River Kwai, which I reviewed on this show a while back and many

of you now regularly write me to say what a great work of art it is and it's all done just with camera film, a ruler, a scissors for cutting and great acting and just a story that achieves epic drama adventure tale of Joseph Conrad level and as good as a good novel is and it make me want to watch all other David Lean movies and I saw recently Passage to India I was an escapist mood I wanted exotic epic story and set in tropical location, and while Lean delivers it on that level with the visuals and the unusual Indian exotic things, the story unfortunately is not exotic. It's too familiar, it's very much a shit lib message. It's an adaptation of E.M. Forster's book, more about him in a moment. He was a writer whose homosexuality is not just incidental, but in his work he prefigures

many of the pathologies of the modern gay oppositional identity, unfortunately. But even so, I would compare Passage to India favorably, the movie I reviewed last week or the week before last to Ridley Scott's The Last Duel, which was just a relentlessly bleak movie, a ham-handed ideological message. Not only in its misandry, it's one of the most man-hating movies I've seen, but the The hen hen way it tried to show all pre-modern European life as unspeakably bleak and hellish. Again there is not a single summer scene, I think it's a whole movie, there's one scene in the forest, but everywhere is shown in this dirty grey winter and downtrodden villages, whereas in Passage to India you get immediate explosion of color. And you don't really see such color in almost any modern movie.

The colors are very varied and vivid. There's something, someone pointed out there's something wrong with color schemes in any modern movie really where you watch movies, colored movies from 60s and 70s and the color palette is incredible. Something's happened. I think something's also happened to the sun outside. If you remember when you were a small boy, you look at sun, it looked redder. Now it's this pale white. Something has been replaced in our world. I don't want to – it's a very dark subject. I don't want to get into this. But simply as visual enjoyment, Ridley Scott movie again is absurd because in last duel you are shown just glimpses of sets. It must have taken weeks to build and weeks to research historically and then it's shown to you for a second or two.

Whereas in Passage to India you can tell David Lean he takes pride in sets he builds. So he lingers. He lingers with camera on them. You see festival with elephant. It's a great joy to see the arrival of the British in Indian City, the procession. And then there are very nice scenes in nature with character running back and forth on top of the bare and large boulders with sky and background. So you know, it's a movie, what about letting viewer enjoy the visual aspects of an alien world? Why don't you want that as filmmaker? On the other hand, I've been told since, and you will forgive if I don't use voice of power by the way on these segments of show, but maybe not appropriate in talking about movies.

I'm also in hotel right now, I'm afraid they may try to inject serum gas through the vents. It's a very dark subject, but on other, I've been told by someone that this is a persistent problem in Ridley Scott movies though. not just in last duel, but he takes a very long time to minutely research and recreate ancient things. He wants in fact to give the viewer an experience of a new world. So for example in Gladiator there is an interview where I think he's saying in Gladiator he researched some type of a helmet in great detail for a long time. So he puts a lot of work and then it never shows up in the movie, it doesn't get shown to the viewer and I don't know if it's because the studio vetoes this or what it is, but

it doesn't matter. It's to be very painful to think of all that wasted effort. It's absurd to just be shown in glimpses. That's why I said he is being made to go through a humiliation ritual with that movie. It may be that the studio insists on it. I don't know. It's odd how normies can enjoy normie movies now. I tried to watch two recently. I cannot get through them. It's the very opposite of what I'm talking about, this kind of calm visual focus on one scene. I tried to watch the most recent James Bond and also another movie called Adam Project with Ryan Reynolds and it's impossible to see through the movie. They have an absurd minority girl boss in all of them who is a ninjak who she's a super fighter, you know,

She saves the man, and just this such tedious, again, heavy-handed message, you know, it's, oh no, the man doesn't save the woman. I will show you the woman saved the man. But it's even worse, they all have this Marvel Comics disease, the CGI fights. Really all movies devolve to Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers choreography now. So everything Mighty Morphin' Power Ranger, weird choreographed fighting with flashing lights, There's no tension, and even the recent, relatively recent Normie movies like Mission Impossible 3, it was exciting. It kept me tense, and Philip Seymour Hoffman was interesting villain, but otherwise now is this bizarre random CGI fight flashing lights. It looked very strange, like it reminded me really of East European peasant folk dance

who pretend to be ninja, you know, it's odd that Normies can love this, I had to turn off these movies in the middle as karate, you know, just what the hell, karate, everything's karate, you know, so but so anyway Ridley Scott, whether he's cucked by the studio not to linger on any one scene, and not to have the viewer to have any one single calm moment of visual contemplation or with some other reason, if he's not cucked, it still amounts to humiliation ritual, and Passage to India, I'm sure it's a restored print, it's visually exciting, beautiful on that alone, it wins. And then the shit-lib message in Passage to India ends up not bother you as much because the aesthetic qualities transfigure everything.

So leftoids can sometimes, I'm not saying David Lean was a leftoid or even that Passage to India is an especially leftoid movie, but speaking of these leftoids can make good movies unfortunately. A recent example is the Argentine original version of The Secret in Their Eyes. I feel so bad that the left made this movie and not the right should have made a movie about 1970s Argentina. But it's quite a good movie, very effective at making the Argentine right and military junta look very bad. But it's an excellent movie nevertheless because it's not just about that. The political message, it's beautifully visual, it's shot also with some innovative things like if you have seen it, there's a scene that begins above a soccer stadium and then

zooms into the action as they're chasing a suspect through the soccer stadium. There's an innovation that is very good and visually new and visually pleasant and second Second of all, it's also a movie about the past and memories and regret and love and such things. In fact, I'm talking about the secret in their eyes now, and it reminds you in some way of the futility of political action and of the futility of the search for political justice in the end, even though it's a leftist message, in the political message it does show. But it transcends that very much is what I'm saying. I always found Buenos Aires a very romantic city, by the way, a friend recently told me it reminds him of a strange Los Angeles. I do not see that relationship at all. It has very unusual feel.

It's a city under Antarctic protection. You can feel protection of Antarctica, aura over it. Unfortunately lately, it's a condition of steep decline, Buenos Aires, the streets are absolute filthy, it's full of shit and beggars and all of this. You know, you need a perfume-infused handkerchief to be able to walk through Buenos Aires now, but in terms of elegance, it has some things that are much better than even nice European cities. I don't know any European city that has cafes as elegant and beautiful as Buenos Aires does, but aside from this, it's in steep decline. It has not recovered from a pandemic yet, not even close. The streets absolutely stink again. There's a river nearby and if you don't clean the streets, the fetid miasma from the river

come in a cloud some days, I don't want to tell you. The pandemic restrictions, not the disease itself, I need to repeat, it kills life. It killed life in Buenos Aires. It exposes to Normies that their lives have never existed at all in the first place. That the space in which they move, this private world, that it's actually conditional. It can be blown up at any one point, that there's no freedom, no love, nothing. And it will take a while for the mystique to re-emerge, a certain mystique that can envelop Normie life, that can make it go on again. It's hard to put it towards how damaging these restrictions have been. But Buenos Aires especially has never been a very pretty city during the day, aside from some very few streets or intersections, excuse the attack. It has some nice parks.

But it's always been a nightlife city and at night it becomes a very different place and it has a gritty magic to it. It's very gritty and very deep in some way, as in it was very wild, not in terms of parting or I don't care about the parting part, but it was wild and deep in how far it went out of central sight and control. Things that were not on Google Maps, things that were not on other maps, things that were completely outside the sight of law enforcement, which could be bought off very easily. So it's like a second world opened up that was ruled by Russian and other mafias and so on. And that's all mostly gone now. And it's up to Lady of the Lake to resurrect her city's knight the same way she did before, by the way. I will invite her on show if she wants to talk.

I don't want to be indiscreet. But she almost single-handed rescued her city's freedom one time before. But I can't talk about this here, but I own tangents. So yes, Passage to India is based on book by same name, Ian Forster, who, story simple, English woman go to colonial India where her fiancé is official, and she essentially is going there, I think with her mother, I think it's with her mother or his mother, I think it's with her mother, I don't remember. I don't remember if it's her mother or the fiancé's mother, but she goes there to break up with him, and she's not in love with him. And along the way, while there, she gets invited to see a natural wonder, these caves in the mountains. She's invited by an Indian doctor who is ambitious.

She wants favor with the British administration, but while they are at the caves with the mother, she has some psychosexual fainting break with reality and ends up accusing the doctor of rape. And then the movie becomes a courtroom drama, which maybe this was a newer thing when Lean made the movie, but it's tedious by now, you know, so Law & Order SVU, but like a very high-class episode of Law & Order SVU. Many of you were maybe forced to read this book in high school, and I dislike, you know, the shittling message, the privileged colonial woman who makes the fake rape accusation against noble native men. I'm actually sure such things happen in real life, but Ian Forster chooses this to show the injustice of colonialism and class and a certain other thing because he was a gay

commie and so on. And it's funny Forster in his youth, or rather not in his youth, look, I need to take twenty second break. Enjoy this unusual absurdist movie. They try to attack me. I cannot keep talk there. They attack my throat. Enjoy this music. One moment. Yes. Welcome back to show you know, it's very strange because I am they're doing these attacks on me. I am over 100 episodes into my show. My long capacity for speech has increased. That's not the problem, but they're doing something to attack my throat. I don't know if it's allergies or what I don't It's gross. I don't want to tell you too much information. Maybe I shouldn't tell you this. Maybe I should tell you Taylor Lawrence is here to give me blowjob and I will do that maybe in the future.

But I'm trying to figure out ways to stop this from happening and honey is a great anti-allergen and it strengthens your throat. Another thing is cigar. If you smoke a cigar or cigarillo, if it's real tobacco, it will completely clear up all respiratory problems, at least for a few minutes. It works like horseradish in that sense. I like it. It's very powerful that way. But anyway, where was I? I was talking to you about how E.M. Forster was a gay commie and he chose this story to telling passage to India about the evil colonial woman who makes up a fake rape accusation. But you know what's funny about colonialism and this type of thing in India with Ian Forster is that Ian Forster in his youth, rather not in his youth but he was maybe 27 or 28, and

he had a friendship with an Indian boy whose tutor he was, this Said Masood or something like this, and he confused the boy's affections for sexual love, which is a funny thing that is frequent for Englishoids of this type during this period. I mean, you know, no, okay, I hold your hand, but it doesn't mean I have sexual desires for you, Mr. Forster, usually the attitude of the Indian or Persian youths who are the target of English perverts of this type, and I cannot do the English accent, but this type of confusion may have been more fruitful for Forster to consider to write a book about than the book he actually made, because this is a constant – I mean, if you look up Lord Mountbatten and his weird relations with his wife and with young boys, and Lord Mountbatten,

the last viceroy of India, I think, he was not only a pedophile, but also a trailblazer in the cuckold lifestyle with his whore wife, you see, but primarily an abuser of young boys, so a spiritual cousin of Ian Forster, and they had similar obsession with this again Middle East Indian man maybe, but maybe I confuse him with another, I don't know. It's hard to keep track of this, the English hobby. And you know me, my name is Bronze Age Pervert, it's not as if these things scandalize me, and I imagine they scandalize none of you if you were socialized on 4chan. So you say, why do I focus on such things? Because in the case of somebody like Forster, he had an opportunity to be self-critical, engage in some introspection about his own weirdness and mistakes when it came to relations

with Indians and so on. But instead he chose to write boilerplate condemning bourgeois colonial administration. So you know it's just this cocktail circuit, cocktail circuit faggy thing to do, right? frivolous art that makes a very conventional social point, and E. Michael Jones had a good line about Ian Forster, he was quoting Forster, something to the effect of, oh we are the community of the sensitive across time, and you know it's just that. If you approach life and the world with this attitude, as opposed to someone like Willoughbeck, and Willoughbeck revels in the dirt of life and in exposing, but also his own dirt, his own fallenness, but if you don't do that and You say, oh, we are the special ones, and you end up then with this very prim lace curtain,

we are the special, this literature that's myopic, where you don't see how ridiculous you are. And I'm not saying, by the way, that introspection is good. I believe in Tom Wolfe-type books, or rather, I believe introspection is good, just not that you should necessarily bother others with it and put it into writing. You should put the fruit of it into writings. But I agree with Tom Wolf-type books that if you want to be an author now, you should not engage in self-indulgent psychologizing and so on. You should try to write about things, about the world, to do research. But then, on the other hand, if you do so without having any self-awareness of what you are, and you're writing to glorify yourself and your selected group or identity, and you're

humorless on top of it, then it just ends up being this self-serving, rationalizing lies in the form of literature. And Ian Forster has another book I may have mentioned on the gay shows, on the shows on the gay movement. The book of Maurice I think is the name, which tells the story of a relationship with a working class man. And I think Forster himself carried a lifelong relation with a married policeman. And this may be topic again for another time, but as an early gay novel this maybe shows a lot about because the desire of such men as Forster is to be with straight men and this is why they go for a working class man where they can pay him because this was relatively easily done before 1950 because of a large working class that still existed in the West

that lived with relatively low living standards in poverty and also had quite different mores than now. Working class mores are different. Gay for pay is more readily an option in that world. But then with the rise of living standards and the spread of bourgeois suburban morality this became impossible to do except for very rich homosexuals. So then you get the birth of the gay movement which tries to solve this problem of sexual access instead through social action and legislation in the same way that feminism is an attempt to solve the sexual problem of aged women also through legislation or through they believe by changing social norms. See, they don't want older men dating younger women. It's not good for them. But aside from crapping themselves, you know, olds who want to import

third-worlders to clean their asses, then you have homos who want to import them for this other reason I'm mentioning now, you know, the rent boy market. And Ian Forster's whole life and preoccupations as also those of his English fop society of queers with their interest in, in this case, Middle Eastern or Indian men, it answers this other part of who's pushing for immigration. And in America, in particular, I told you the gays are some of the most racist people you can come to know. And because in general they don't like blacks and they're very racist against blacks, who are the only ones they could get by paying them under current conditions in the United States. Because they don't want that, they want to import, you know, somewhat less black or brownish

men from Latin America or the Middle East, so this drives part of the immigration debate too, but it's never admitting. And I went on this tangent to try to hint to you that Ian Forster, despite his name as a famous novelist, is very much a myopic, shit-lib, gay, caught up in the delusions and conventions of the shit-lib and queer intelligentsia of our own time, of which he's an ancestor, a very near ancestor. And the teaching of this book, A Passage to India, in high schools, they teach this book. It amounts, in my opinion, to a kind of early CRT, critical race theory, the kind of book of slander meant to show his perceived enemies, the straight bourgeois English conservative colonial world to show them in the worst kind of light.

But even given all this, David Lean, I think he didn't pick the book because of this message. He just picked because it happened to be a very popular book, very big sales as soon as it was written. The disease is very old, you know. It didn't start with Law and Order episode or Nickelodeon. It's very old. But David Lean chose this book because he wanted maybe an excuse to display Exotic India in unusual locations. So the guy who plays the Indian doctor, Victor Banerjee, I think his name is, he's quite good in the movie. Actually, unlike Bridge Over River Kwai, this movie doesn't have characters that are that memorable, but the doctor Victor Banerjee, played by Victor Banerjee, he's quite good. In real life Victor Banerjee is Bengali Brahmin, but in movie he plays a Muslim,

it doesn't matter. But this role today would not be possible. It would be made just unbelievably mockish and heavy-handed, you know, but in the movie he's good because he's shown as not morally perfect, he's too eager, he's petally ambitious and officious, but he has strong redeeming quality toward the end where he shows possibility of friendship. His only character in movie that's of any interest, but a contrast anyway, all of this aside, the movie, like The Last Duel, is also about rape accusation and also has a very shit-lit message. But in the end I recommend it to you, and I can't condemn it really because its redeeming qualities are mostly visual in the cinematography and the exotic scenes that are shown of Indian rituals and so on.

The story character shown is okay, but the biggest fault is the moral message and also setting of courtroom drama have become tedious by our time, very conventional. It doesn't transcend anything you don't know about in that way. So the Bridge Over River Kwai become timeless tale of struggle between primal archetype, whereas this movie, Passage to India, is very much dated in its story and so on. But on the other hand, again, the visual aspects, it's worth watching for that alone. I will be right back to talk more movies. Welcome back to show. I was just look on Twitter, everyone is wilding out. It feel like prison break Twitter 2022. Some unknowns are seeing that Bezos, who is being humiliated in the replies, they're saying

Bezos, you give us money, you pay us to stop making fun of you and same kind of tribute. We can now demand tribute from billionaires. Some are demanding girlfriends, they say they want this Japanese large breast. Much excitement on Twitter today, and I hope Silly Zog Valley listening for ideas, they can provide us all with Catgirl. I think Elon Musk promised this. He promised Catgirl companions. But to return to movie show, Monica Bellucci, do you like her? Do you like Monica Bellucci? Speaking of gay, I knew a gay dude who say Monica Bellucci movie Molina almost turned him straight. And it made me think this other idea, by the way, for Silly Zog Valley, maybe evangelicals should try to do it this way.

therapy through extremely hot prosthesis or actresses who give their bodies to the cause? I mean, are there any hot evangelical Christian ego influencers who want to do this? I think it could work better. This and a repeat diet to cure homosexuality, you give your bodies to help convert gay guys and help out incels. This is my advice for religious girls. of, you know, whatever it is evangelicals do, girls do now in Starbuck bathrooms, which you don't know about because they're almost all sluts by the way, the religious girl, please ask you to protect yourself from these Orthodox religious girls believes that, you know, sodomy, I don't want to get into it, but they believe that it keeps them pure. I don't want to get into that, you know, it's not modern churches do everything they can

and they include other religions too, but modern mega-churches especially, these mawkish where they sing these songs, they do everything they can to excuse any kind of behavior from women with predictable, but so anyway, Monica Bellucci, and she starred in a movie Irreversible by Gaspar Noe, and it's quite shocking movie even if you've seen before, the very long rape scene in the middle, it became very famous. In fact, many girls, if you've known them where they can be honest with you, will tell you find this scene quite arousing. And the movie when it first came out, cinema, I saw it in cinema with Grille, who she was an artsy Grille show, she pretended not to be shocked at any of this movie. But it's a very harsh I still remember it from that time.

And apparently there is a subsonic drone played in the cinema version of the movie. I was not aware of this. But to only increase your panic at watching, it's a frantic movie. I still remember it from many years ago, not just a rape scene, but the movie itself takes place in this very dark cinematic universe of director Gaspar Noe. If you've seen some of his other films, he has a movie, I Stand Alone Against the World, and he has another one, Enter the Void, and all are about this very gritty nightlife where he captures the dystopian hellish dirt of modern city better than anyone I know, and he's Argentine I think, but he grew up in France. So I was not going to watch movie again, irreversible, but I decided for show, well let me see for

first minutes to remind me, as soon as I started, first 10 minutes in, I couldn't stop. It's so ugly, but it draw you in, is atmosphere of frantic search in this Paris shown as a grimy as fuck dystopia, the way Thomas Severn would put it for your words. It's a movie told backwards in time, and I'm not really interested so much in that gimmick or speculating why he does it. It might be just, you know, artsy trick of no import. But it's obvious that the movie has some philosophical pretensions because in the last scene, which is the first chronologically, Monica Bellucci is lying down in the park reading book by J.W. Dunn, An Experiment with Time. And this is unusual British scientist, technologist actually wrote book. He says some foretelling of the future can appear in dreams.

And then there is question if the story in fact told happens or if it's a dark dream or nightmare. But such question I find uninteresting in judging the movie. So in any case it's told backwards in time and it's really supposed to be a revenge story because Vincent Cassel who is a famous French actor who is Monica Bellucci's husband I think in real life but also in the movie and a friend of the couple in the movie who is actually her ex, they go on a fevered search, accosting tranny street prostitutes and many such things, and they are looking for the man who brutally beat and raped Monica Bellucci in a tunnel underpass at night, as she's leaving a party. So it's a cautionary tale in that sense, do not be an emotional panicked idiot because

you'll get the wrong guy, you'll make mistakes, you'll be manipulated, you know, so in this movie you don't get the satisfaction of violent revenge. But anyway, again, that's not really what you're left with. It's supposed to be a revenge movie, but you're not left with that one way or another. You're left with two or three sensations. One again is very accurate telling of this utter grime of nightlife in a place like Paris, which is not shown the elegant lounges in this. In his other movie, I Stand Alone is also part of the same world, and that is homage to Taxi Driver, this movie, I Stand Alone, and there is an incest theme in it, which incest is usually gross themes in movies, but in I Stand Alone it is not done in a gratuitous way.

And then he has another movie arguably set in the same universe of dirty night life, it's called Enter the Void, which takes place in Tokyo, and it's about an American youth in Tokyo who is a drug dealer. So this is a world that is unfamiliar, let's say, to a character like the one Monica Bellucci plays in this movie and to many nice, I'm sure, educated women who might listen to my show. It's a world that you might actually never come in touch with even if you go out at night, but this is kind of woman, Monica Bellucci in the movie, who wants to be hip, but she's genteel like most of you are and that's okay. But you go to a nice lounge or this type of thing and you don't see what happens in certain gay club which is in this movie.

So in that sense, it's film about naivete of women and the class naivete of rich women like Monica Bellucci plays who think the gay guy is the guy who holds her purse. But it doesn't beat you over the head with this naivete message. The rapist openly expresses hatred, you know, calls her a rich whore and this. But it's not shown as a university lecture, the way such concerns come out in other movies I've mentioned. Again, like the last duel. But it's just that most women, especially beautiful women, who are almost always if not rich themselves, they have access to rich men and a rich life. And they're just not aware of this other world or the danger they're actually in walking on the street. And it's not their fault that they don't know that. They shouldn't know that.

But they live in a socially different world, that's why they don't know it. So the contrast of that rape scene and the world out of which the rapist comes, the contrast of this to Bellucci's world where actually Gaspar Noe is very good at showing this. There are some very cruel and subtle scenes where she and her fiancé and the ex, they're heading to the party, they're in the subway and the talk of sex comes up and the ex, you You know, in a kind of passive-aggressive but humorous way, asks her, so why are you with this guy now? What did I do wrong? Well, this guy give you that I couldn't. And she says a truth, a truth common that won't be shocking to you. You may have heard it from Heart East and the PUA world by now, but it's a common truth in any case to any woman who's self-aware.

And she's honest and tells him, you know, you were always too self-conscious. You're always too concerned with my own pleasure during sex wars. But a woman wants to give you pleasure, wants to give pleasure to a man. She gets pleasure from that. She wants to see him possessed with desire for her and to feel possessed herself. She wants him to selfishly unleash on her. She gets pleasure from being taken like that. And it's a frank discussion of sexual dynamics that is true and it's lost on most so-called nicer or too educated men. But on the other hand, it takes place after the rape in the movie, but chronologically again before it. So it's this kind of cruel commentary on, oh, that's what you want, you will get it for real.

And what is that real is she was expressing a primal truth, of course, but again, she was expressing it within the confines of civilization and of a genteel civilized society that exists for the benefit of women like her, who want to see well-lighted and safe streets, who want, in the act of sex, maybe a controlled play at this, not really at rape, but rather at ravishment, which put her, and again, put the woman at center. And in fact, and she's right about that, but she's not remotely ready for the uncivilized and barbaric, real, and socially unedited version of that. And then the other amazing part of the movie is who is this rapist himself, why he does it and he's a homosexual in the movie. Okay, so the movie got called by critics as possibly the most homophobic movie ever made

and I believe this correct assessment, I wouldn't call it homophobic, I would call it homo real because this homosexual pimp, and he's a pimp, he runs Tranny Street Prosties, okay, but he's a homo and he finds this beautiful woman walking alone and he wants nothing more than to destroy her beauty and just because she's beautiful he wants to despoil and utterly crush it. So he rapes this woman who happens also to be pregnant at the time and he anally rapes her and that caused a great stir, journalists were outraged and they said it's absurd that he's homosexual as if they don't know that homo guys occasionally have sex with women and that the way that this man is depicted is very common type in this shitty grimy night world that exists.

But so he anally sodomizes her and then bashes her face in. So it's, you know, homosexual low class rage at what he could never have. And it's shown without compromise because if you've known people like this in filthy sewers below all the big shitties, they exist, it's very honest portrayal. So you know, it's very shocking for middle-class, genteel, liberal girl, who again thinks that gays are these guys who, to hold person, talk like a 13-year-old girl and hold shitly politic. When – it's funny, same thing about serial killers, by the way. Ted Bundy is the rare, alpha-smooth exception, but most serial killers are, you know, half-homeless, psychotic, low-class hobos, you know, they live on trains or in a car.

Omega type, it's not Ted Bundy, you know, the types unleashed in the zombie apocalypse recently in cities across the world. I'm not saying all the homeless are serial killers, but they come out of that world. The homeless problem is terrible across the world, it's not confined by the way to San Francisco or you may have heard Alex Jones complain about it in Austin. Again, if you go to Buenos Aires or Rio, and Rio always had this problem because of the slums, but it's got much worse recently. The streets absolutely packed with homeless schizophrenic knickknocks, they're screaming people's faces, they can't do anything about it. And Buenos Aires, you simply cannot sit out at a restaurant or cafe, and sometimes they come even in restaurants, restaurant owners cannot do anything about them.

And if I may mention again what I told you in the first segment about this false concern with economic problems. It's easy to notice this worldwide zombie homeless apocalypse and to say, oh, this is caused by late industrial capitalism and the economic pressures that have left to more people getting, you know, we don't live in a society anymore. And the Gotham discourse from Joker movie and from other Gotham movies, we need more money for them programs, it's the excesses of hyper capitalism that have led to this glut of homeless, it's very easy for an intellectual to make that narrative and some on the right even I imagine are tempted to do so and it's totally wrong because it's not an economic cause to the zombie apocalypse, it's leftist mayors and leftist city councils making conscious

decision to close down the mental asylums and to stop having police enforcing vagrancy laws and actually to have police prosecute people who try to protect their property or restaurants from these types, which in part they do I imagine for human rights morality that they genuinely believe in and in larger part because they are driven by hatred of normal taxpayers. But it's a moral political decision. It's not a result of systemic economic problems with late capitalism and so forth. So anyway, I went to you on this tangent. But yes, Ted Bundy is very unusual serial killer, serial killer much more like the homeless insanity people, zombies who harass you at café. So in the same way, the cleaned up sitcom homosexual, homosexual you see with sitcom

laugh tracks with a sensitive whatever and Andy Sullivan you know the type I pretend that I'm a white picket fence suburban housewife homo which is what Andy Sullivan wishes he could be a Catholic housewife right it's bizarre to me but okay but those excuse me those are really the exception or what team cock presents for public consumption in fact the tranny pimp you see in irreversible, the lump-and-prol dystopian hell nightlife homo, this is the more frequent phenomenon by far. And I say that knowing that probably a genteel homo guy might not even ever see a guy like depicted in this movie, but nevertheless, this is what homosexuality is. It's shown in irreversible and it gets shown in the first scenes of the movie where in

and pursuit of this character, the criminal Vincent Cassel and the other guy, they are chasing him through Paris and they end up in club rectum, you know, where it just exposes homosexuality as pure sadism, the first scenes of this movie, right? So it's a side effect of, in other words, homosexuality is mostly a side effect of sadomasochism. It's a fetish that, and this movie just, you know, without philosophical elaboration, it It just shows you that, which is obvious to anyone who has spent time in underseems of these infernal cities. It is a will to destruction and self-destruction. So if you show this human rat the pimp Latinia, which is what he smartly calls himself, he names himself after a gastrointestinal parasite, a worm, literally a worm, who's a specialist in fisting.

And he comes out of this dirty world and his genuine interaction with the world of the The genteel is one of utter destruction only. And just this movie show you the sadism of fag culture. So it was widely condemned for this. It could never get made today. It's very rough movie. I suggest you watch, you could watch it with a girl if she's the kind who can take it. Do not watch, you know, with children or anything. But the ending is just horrible. Very sad movie. Very sad movie actually. I must wipe my mind from it. The dirt of it is a little bit entrancing the dirt of Gaspar Noe's imagination of city life. But I just want to end this segment with one observation again using this movie to attack Ridley Scott, Les Duell.

Because in Les Duell, one of the most absurd scenes in that absurd movie is where the mother-in-law who hates the wife tells her to suck it up because she had been raped too in her youth. This is in the Les Duell now movie about medieval France. So the mother-in-law says, no, no, do not make this accusation, just take it. Just shut up, shut her mouth. Like all aristocratic women, we were all raped, but we all didn't say anything because we don't want to cause problems for society or whatever. So again, the Me Too program, a word on the sleeve, and the pretense that in medieval Europe not only were women traded like cattle and property, but that it was this kind of rape fest, you know, just even aristocratic women were constantly getting raped right

and left by these men who were raping each other's wives in castles and so on, which is just a perverse inversion of the truth because one would wonder what men then got out of this arrangement of marriage. I mean if the social structure as shown implies that you were, even if the lord of a castle your wife got raped as a matter of course by your friends, so you couldn't even be sure Before then everyone was raising other people's sons apparently and I suppose it tries to send the message that okay you took that because you also raped other women right and left. So you know it's like this kind of bonobo society. It's bizarre. So this male dominated society is shown as a rape fest where men rape each other's wives. It's a bizarre inversion. Why would you allow this to happen as a man?

What do you get out of it? If there was a pool of courtesans kept in a barn, I could understand, but then why institution of marriage? Why assume the role of a husband and its duties? And the duties are of course not shown in the movie, but why tie yourself to one woman if the point is that she belongs sexually also to every other man? What is point of these marriage ceremonies? Why not just have common temple prostitutes and so on? And of course this is bizarre inversion because likely no women in history were safer than the ones depicted in the last duel, the ladies of a medieval manner, no women were likely better protected for things like violence and rape, where by contrast, it is in modern progressive city where, again, the zombies have been let loose and women are a couple

of drinks and a wrong turn on the street away from a fate like that and irreversible. This is true. And it doesn't come from college boys of your own class. It comes from feral niggas, or as in this case from some homo half Arab pimp who wants to dominate it by dug you in the ass to show you up for being a rich bitch and many other such things. So it's in the sewers of the modern city that you're most at risk as a woman. So irreversible, which I don't care what Gaspar Noe is politically, but it tells the truth of modern life and shows up as a grotesque feminist lies you see in the others I discussed, especially the last new one. So the handmade tale and so forth, absurd misunderstanding of male desire. Pure man desire, if you want to depict that, would be to reduce you to temple whores.

A man might want a girlfriend or courtesans for fun, but why you believe men actually want the duties of marriage and to force you to be mired in domestic life so much? This was an institution for the protection of women and it lasted as long as it could and now you are on your own in the back alleys with Latenia, with a Berber fag pimp who names himself after a rectal worm. Good luck, ladies. I am sure a self-defense class you took where you learned to slam a pad in the groin, I'm sure this will save you from Latenia. Anyway, I will be right back. Back to the show, Twitter is just blowing up. They are demanding that Elon Musk set up Boer white nationalism. They are saying this is the return of Afrikaner, of white supremacy, an amazing time, the rebirth,

this is the rebirth of Rhodesia, we're seeing online now with Elon, but what I was talking about the strange female delusion, not all women, but some many female delusions that men want to trap you, the feminist delusion that men want to trap you into domestic life, to make a washing machine out of you, and that the man gets his value out of dominating women, which is really when you look at Michel Foucault, you see the same misunderstanding, but exaggerated, because like any fag, he takes a woman's desires and makes a burlesque bouffant exaggeration of what they want and what they are. So he too has this delusion that men deserve nothing more than to use women and boys as sperm receptacles. And in both cases, whether it's shrill feminist or delusional gay Foucault, they're taking

their own psychosexual, narcissistic desires to be the receptive taker of male attention and ravishment and pretending it's what most men deeply want. I mean, it's funny when you realize, oh, you want to tie me down and you want to ravish me, huh? You want to… You know, the likely natural state of a normal man is indifference. And because of this indifference, traditional societies had to offer the man ownership over the family and even power of life and death over it to entice him, but in large part to assure him of his paternity. This is the only way monogamy can work because most men are not interested in that life. They are indifferent. They don't care. Women and gays of the type like Foucault and feminist women, they imagine most deeply.

It's a dear thought to them that men want desperately to dominate them. But this is what's so bizarre about the conceit of feminist literature like Ridley Scott's movie The Last Duel, that type of society depicted, because there would be no guarantee of paternity, but quite the opposite. It would almost be guaranteed that the child is not yours in the universal rape society. Europe is shown as universal bonobo rape society. So a man who toils his whole life, and not just toils, but in that case these men are risking their body in war and what for? To leave their estates to the sons of others. And it's just an absurd misunderstanding of what traditional marriage was meant to guarantee for a man and why all of those rules existed, what the tradeoff was.

And to guarantee this paternity, many privileges, I mean to say, were given because otherwise a man has no interest in catering to a woman and a family and reducing his own freedom in this way. So this is a longer way of saying that it's a huge mistake to believe that a real man's life is in the home or in the fulfillment of a man is in the domestic. That may be so for deficient males or what I've called long house drones and such types, but even if you remember I had Bishop Richard Williamson, it does not get more traditionalist than this, I had him on the show, and he agrees it is huge distortion of men's nature to reduce himself to a help meet for women in her domestic life as part of her narcissistic story about her home and her life and so forth. It's a huge misunderstanding.

Traditional Catholics did not believe that a man was this. A woman who is healthy actually comes to not respect that kind of man. And it's good that she doesn't. Because this then narrows existence really just to mere life. Man is not supposed to be narrow to that horizon. And all of this should be kept in mind when you watch this next movie I talk, Woman in the Dunes, which is a Japanese movie from 1964 directed Hiroshi Teshigahara after book by Kobo Abe. He's written books some years before, I don't know, and it's often called this existential classic cinema. It's very angsty, it's very mid-century European feel, it's an allegory, it's a retelling of the myth of Sisyphus. And it's inspired because of the Sisyphus literary background, it's then inspired a

lot of literary theory type commentary. It's philosophical movie in style of allegory, and it's a twist on theme of movies I've talked about for a while, since two shows ago, on rape and so forth, the movies I've talked about are about men raping women. Here is a man who's getting raped. It's a man's nightmare, the equivalent of rape. But in this case, it's to be trapped in the circular meaninglessness of domestic life in the web of a woman. She's a spider woman. And the plot is simple. It's a teacher from Tokyo. He go on trip to find beetles. He's an amateur entomologist. And he arrive on the seaside desert part of Japan, which does exist, I think, a small area on northern coast that is desertified, it's dunes, and he misses the last bus to town so he takes

up the offer of local peasants to spend the night in the house of a local woman. And then they trap him there in this kind of a pit valley surrounded by sand dunes, so he's trapped with this woman, and the two of them as a couple have, you know, forced families, they have the task every night to load sand and then literally to clear sand out of their small valley, but there's always more and more sand seeping in, so you know just fruitlessly keeping encroaching nature at bay. This claustrophobic movie, there are many beautiful but also frightening shots of the sand, of the sand seeping in, of the men on the sand dunes walking and so forth, and it's good visual art simply as photography. This movie is in the Criterion Edition, it's restored and so forth, and this is a black

and white movie. But so you can imagine with this Sisyphus-like tale, I mean to say with this background it inspires a lot of theorizing and so forth what could be said about it that it's an allegory again for late capitalism. But then smarter critics will quickly notice well there is nothing about this fruitless toil depicted in the movie that's unique to capitalism. So it's actually an allegory for the pain of labor of men in general and of human life as such. They don't come out to say it, but of urban bugman life of whatever kind, the fruitlessness of it. Because it's not as if communism, by the way, even if achieved, that can solve this problem of necessity, except maybe in its final paradise in the state, when if you scrutinize that,

it would be its own hell, not of the pain of labor, but the pain of boredom. Because the Marxists can never see beyond the material needs. And so then the satisfaction of these material needs would just bring the giant hole of boredom. So really, the only Marxists worth knowing, if you have the misfortune of knowing any, but the only Marxists are those who don't take the ideology too seriously. They just see it as opportunity for struggle, which none of the tankies that you see online are the irony left podcasters, right? What a waste. A bunch of mamzers idling in a room with their fag hags. It's the opposite of a hardcore 1930s Marxist who loves blood. You know who loves blood? The real inheritor of that spirit is Saddam Hussein.

With Saddam Hussein go a $12 Borgar Roebling tearoom with Saakashvili from Georgia. I think that place closed by the way. But the irony left fake Marxists, they are getting revved up the other day over George Floyd plush dolls and so congrats to Nightmare Vision for making us all laugh the other day. He made these Brooklyn fops clutch their pearls because of the, he posed George Floyd dolls, you know, racism is not cool bro, racism is boomer, but racism is very cool. George Floyd, Derek Chauvin, plush toys, very cool, very hip, but so anyway, the movie cannot be about capitalism and is only general, you see how they attack me. Woman in the Dunes is only generally about the meaningless and Sisyphean character of

life as such. I think it's much more specifically about woman and about woman's rape of a man, what it looked like, it looked like this. It's named after all woman in the dunes and at its center is the character, this peasant woman, and she's really what turns it from what would otherwise be something too cerebral. I don't really like allegory type movie. It would be too theatrical and cerebral, but she turns it into a real horror movie. You You just have to see it. She plays this very blank autistic type you would call, but it's not autism. She plays blank airhead, but with these animal eyes that are deep pool static of very alien, very catonic self-absorption. So Japanese are some of the best at doing femme fatale, but it's not even femme fatale. They take that to the horror level.

If you see recent Japanese horror movie Audition, O-D-I-S-H-O-N, from 1999, it's a similar thing in a woman, she's giving an audition and she captures the director and feeds him beer and her own vomit, she keeps him locked in a closet, just traps, tortures him. But she too has this very calm, unperturbable manner, expressionless, very deep dark eyes, no show of emotion. It's basically the same character from Woman in the Dunes, updated, but it's very frightening when you see this female archetype, it triggered very potent ancient fear and mind of everyone, shows Japanese psychological aptitude for what frightens, for what is remembered from primeval past, what is known really about power of woman, and very different from shallow

contemporary American writer who are brainwashed by academic theories and they're out to prove something and who mistake this chatty, hyper-aware type of woman, they mistake that for strength. And you know, a woman acting like neurotic Danny DeVito, that's not strength, but they think it is. Or of course the karate girl boss. You know, they have one on the new Cobra Kai series, a teenage girl who is so unpleasant to watch, I don't think I've ever seen this. In every scene without let-up, she's frankly psychotic, bristling with rage. In every scene, this is shown as a good model for girls, just to be full of rage, to be, on the other hand, to be chatty and to keep up on latest social media trends and be hyper-aware.

And it's as if, if I encourage you, any of you who have doubts about this, to volunteer for a martial arts class, where you know, they have women's, and see what happens when you spar with a woman, meaning you let them, you know, hit your pad with their fists, and as hard as they may hit. Get a woman to hit you as hard as she can with her fists. You will basically not feel any force on that pad when she hits you. A woman's understanding of her physical powerlessness is the beginning of her other truer powers. You know, it's as if you have a disabled man, disabled from childhood, but he wants to imagine himself a physical specimen superman. He would make a fool of himself. He would be much better off developing other skills. his wiles, his wits, something else.

Woman has something still more powerful than that. But the beginning of her development of that primal power is not trying to be a karate girl boss, which if you point out even what I've said now with the best of intentions for women as I do in the book, your cold part, they call me part of the patriarchal conspiracy to mire women in the misogynist archetype of femme fatale. They're anything to hide nature and natural differences you see. And of course, they're going to get women in a lot of trouble because a self-defense seminar and the false confidence this propaganda shows give you will not save you in any situation where a man, even a very weak man, tries to assault you. Without a gun, if you're a woman, you stand no chance whether you need a gun.

So more generally, it ruins those certain few women who could develop this true weapon, profound psychological mastery, unperturbed dominion over catonic pull. I believe in this. A woman can exert almost magical power of control over men if she has this aptitude and then works to develop it. But I've almost never seen this in any educated woman of the West. Some of these TikTok girls, they practice at making sad faces to manipulate men. It's very amateurish and transparent. That's not what I'm talking about. The Japanese very much hold to this image, it frightens, fascinates them, and it's at the center of this movie where this entomologist who traps and studies insects for the sake of discovery and science, who is a teacher who spends his free time, his hobbies exploring

new areas, trying to classify and break through nature, so it's very masculine archetype but But he himself gets trapped in the desert by a woman, and he's spiritually and otherwise raped. And the book is apparently even more explicit with this understanding. It talks about certain beetles who lure their prey out into the desert to trap them. And this is what happened to this man. He's trapped in this being who shows itself as a woman in its web. And then the community of peasants, with this movie, peasants are accurately shown very bad light as retrograde half-pagan freaks. They seek to crush you, but this community is shown again as an extension of the woman and existing only to support her desires for domestic envelopment of a man.

And in this case, the allegory is made much stronger because again it's scientific exploratory man who is broken. So this nightmare of domesticity shows you it's a rape nightmare of a man, the pure rape of a man where irreversible is the pure rape of a woman. But it's a curative to feminists, actually both movies in own way are a curative to shallow legalistic, moralistic feminist understandings of rape, which deny totally the nature of man and of his desires. You want to see what is rape to a man, it's your own fantasies of trapping him in the meaninglessness of this domestic life and of a community built around the perpetuation solely of this life, which deletes also all privacy. Good peasant freaks. Do I need to get into the peasant freak? salt of the earth.

Some of you, in your hatred, often a rightful dislike of the urban bug men, but then you have head up club rectum when it comes to peasant freaks. You think they're good people. They're horrid. They torture animals. They're pervert freaks. They walk into your house if you have a cabin. Many of them are close to literal retarded, and modern life being what it is, you can go to, I'm talking about Europe now, but you can go to a provincial town even, not to speak a village and you will not see a single attractive girl because all of them live for the big shitty and then you have no attractive girls left there. It becomes very dystopian. But really why they live, you would too. Life sucks in rural area generally. Is no privacy or nothing. You're not in a cabin alone.

I spent the summer near Nixello some time ago before I wrote book. This is a Croat village, you know, it's much worse than being in a city because European villages or houses are all close together. So everyone watching you all the time and they're freaks and it's the type of place where you know, where people are bored. And if I wanted to start a cult there where I'm the guru and I fuck their wives and everyone drinks everyone else's urine or something like this, you know, which is quite common this type of thing with peasants that may be the kind of thing or a sputum came out of. Do not be fooled about peasants. Movies like this, Woman in Dunes or Kurosawa Seven Samurai, they tell truth about peasants.

And in the end of this movie, the trapped man becomes so excited because he does something that's not pure domestic and he goes back to his technological nature. He invented a kind of device to collect water and ease that labor load. I don't know, evaporation from sand, doesn't matter. He designs this, but it's a technical invention that he becomes so enamored with that he forgets to return to civilization. He stops trying to escape. I found it harder to understand this part, and I suppose it's making a point that his desire for scientific discovery and recognition is met even in this Sisyphean hellish place that he's trapped in, but it's not a very satisfying ending, but I don't know what would have been. Like in Irreversible, your desire to see a righteous revenge is snubbed.

So these two movies are in that sense though better movies about rape than Last Duel or Passage to India. Although all of the ones I talked, the David Lean one, the Passage to India is the most pleasant to watch visually speaking. And I know that I've been dwelling on some dark movies that are not especially, and even And this woman in the dunes, if it had not been for amazing cinematography and the entrancing horror show of this central woman again, I would have found it very hard to watch. It's not a pleasant movie, you know, and this is why I make apology at the end now because no movies I talk about on this show or the last one are quite so pleasant, but I will make up for it. On the next movie show, I will talk for you only beautiful, pleasant movie, like again

maybe David Lynch, Inland Empire. So very good. I must continue drive tomorrow through peasant areas I can say nothing more for now next show will come out very soon send me power as I might go into tropical forest send me protection from bacchantes and pray for Ilan to show the world what African men like him are made out of very good until next time BEP out