Just now, the French police declare they are in a state of war and they are threatening to stand down tomorrow if the state does not free them to act, does not take off handcuff of police. We will see. It would be nice if France went to civil war, but then people shrugged it off and said, well, the French riot all the time. My friend Loki remarks this. It would be very funny. Nothing ever happens. And this is a political mix episode because there are a United States Extreme Court is producing one showy edict after another, first banning supposedly affirmative action and bringing back, therefore, segregation and slavery and certain other edicts that I may mention. And finally, of course, Wagner, the hot dog vendor, Prigozhin single-handed, almost

restarting history. Better luck next time, Prigozhin. You almost kicked off the Michelin century. Prigozhin, he would have inspired many copycats where you would have maybe 20 to 30 tyrannies throughout the world over the next 15 years, all run by Mishlings. Would you like to see this happen? But I'll tell you what I really think is behind the Prigozhin weird drama later. Can I go on tangents on this episode? Will you let me go on tangent? It was Solstice the other day, the beginning of summer. Did you celebrate this? My Scandinavian friends write me and send me beautiful photograph they did the bonfire in Lithuania is not well it's Baltic whatever but they jump over the bonfire in Lithuania also in other part of Europe under the pretext of Saint John Baptist Day is how it survived into

Christian times it is celebrated by the Basques also in their city St. Joan de Luz and yes I refuse to use French accent I'm saying it in Occitan instead Why do you think Nietzsche was obsessed with the troubadours? But I will have to talk this and the glory of Provence another time. But this city I mentioned is in Basque countries. They have bonfires too on St. John's Day, really mid-summer day, and attract many tourists on these first days of summer. And in Balkans, especially important in also the Baltic region, but exists in the Balkans. In Romania it's called the Senzienes celebration, which again survived to modern times and there's a fig leaf placed on it, again that it's St. John's Day. But in fact the association in this particular festival with fairies and nymphs as a festival

of fertility and love, it's all still there and bonfires. And I ask my Icelandic friends, and it's funny because of all the nations of Europe, maybe Iceland was the most cool, the most reserved about adopting Christianity. It was rather imposed on them by other Scandinavians. It seems so, it was widely unappreciated, especially in rural areas. But because of this, paradoxically, they do not have traditional bonfire festivals. They abandoned their paganism unwillingly and replaced it with a thin Christianity, but no real, perhaps, no real pagan holdover religion. are being reintroduced now, I mean, the Midsummer bonfires are being reintroduced now in Iceland as a self-conscious revival of lost traditions. But attendance, I am told, is somewhat awkward

because, again, there was no continuous link, whereas in other European nations, it survived precisely because it had some Christian sanction or fig leaf and people were more enthusiastic about religion than in Iceland, where there are quite a few Icelandic frogs, and maybe I ask one on show to explain this paradox, but it seems that in Iceland, again, religion feeling in general was wiped out and mixed with a precursor to atheism. And it seems, again, it seems to me as an outsider that pagan sensibility survived not in a preservation of certain older customs like this, but in the manner and style of thought of the men themselves. And again, what its expression is more rather toward atheism or skepticism and toward the moral relativism or rather even moral savagery that I much appreciate.

I'm sorry for this detour. Does it bother you? I'm reminded of story I once heard about Muslim clerics from Iran who nevertheless on March 21, which is the start of spring and of New Year, that they went on a flowering field. That's certainly not in the Muslim calendar, by the way, that's in the Zoroastrian calendar. although which has preserved the Indo-European or Aryan traditions. But they went to a flowering field in the 80s, long lettuces dipped in honey. And this man who told me this story laughed saying these are Muslim clerics. And this is the most Indo-European possible religious festival you can have. I mean, it has parallels in many old. So anyway, please excuse this tangent. I hope you enjoy start of summer. I wish upon my friends many blessings of fire and fertility

and for frogs to impregnate and knock up many women's Chimp out mass now holds bard orgy on something like an island of Bali Would you like there should be summer conception Dionysian rituals for encouraging birth rate? Only among men and women of high spirit and intelligence, but this isn't show about utopia At least not directly Although it is I'm doing multi-part series about my favorite era the ancient Greeks the archaic Greeks and the classical Greeks mankind only a point of redeeming light along with Renaissance Italy. Without these two times, it's doubtful the sight of the human race would be tolerable. It would be very depressing. And so I talk the ancient Greece, the ancient Greek man's, not quite his quotidian life of ancient

Greeks. This is why I do this series, the quotidian life of, you know that series, but not quite that. But I mean focusing specifically on an ancient Greek man's romantic affairs, matters of passion, his sexual practices, and many such that I know these things are always matters of interest and gossip and and by typical Greek men I mean the aristocrats of course because it was their culture in society only is that produced the grand works of art and philosophy poetry that are still admired or pretended my art it said that yes the normal fag only admires because he feels compelled by social sanction but that by nature he does not admire. He's indifferent to art or even hostile to it. Same as when you see General Butt naked's uprising in Sierra Leone or was that Liberia and you

like you know Liberia was a special project of the United States that's nation-building Liberia but I whatever it was in one of these countries I mixed them up because their uprisings had some similarities but the rebels took special time to hack and cleave to burn pianos they found concert pianos they did this out of rage that the symbols of their oppressor should exist at all and now you may hear what's going on in Paris this week because of a great number again of happenings these last two weeks I interrupt Greek series to talk political news and such on this episode but I will be back talking Greek so next but yes you are hitting Paris now with a renewed rioting and yes they would absolutely

Absolutely burned down every museum and precious artwork that's stored in that city by the way and anywhere else they could find it In fact, if you check my account Twitter I posted video of attempts during this uprising to burn down the biggest library in Marseille of course French police are still strong and they have Self-consciousness as a class and they will defend the more critical sites, maybe but, you know, during French Commune Uprising in 1871, I think that's the year on aftermath of loss in Franco-Prussian War, and the Parisian-negrified rabble of the pre-Aryan apes was rising again. Of course, now such people make up the majority of Europe now for the last few generations, which is why, you know, you're seeing all the commotions of our time. This is where the slow slide into

gynocractic race communism but this rabble rose up upon France's losing the war with Prussia I think it was 1871 they were going to burn down the Louvre you see and in that one act you have the entire meaning of the left and what it's all about burn down the Louvre I I was actually in France in Paris in 2005 when the last big round of rats took place very similar to this one maybe they had a few less automatic weapons I happen to like kebab actually I was having I was quite poor at the time so I was having kebab sometime for lunch until I saw a cockroach on the tables but the Syrians I think they were saying they made the extra spice for me with harissa sauce and we talk Islamic Jihad. Yeah I've always been opposed to this of course but at the time I always got along very

well with Muslim radicals even though we insulted each other but there were Egyptian bodybuilder hardcore jihadis working in convenience store. I made friends with them, they would always try to convert me, would you have liked to see me become a jihadi? But anyway, the riots are going now all over France, and my friend Malmsbury says these happen again from time to time unrelated to matters in America. So the George Floyd thing is nothing new internationally, and following those riots in 2005, they were especially bad. I remember asking, I rented my landlord so-called. I rented a very small box-like, box-sized apartment right off St. Germain Street. I refuse to pronounce French correctly, I will not even try. And this man, he was a ginger with a temper of gingers.

If you ever see orange cat, it's always very fiery and violent, wants to scratch or bite and if you had ginger girlfriend ever with ginger everything, ginger this, and they can get quite violent or they can like violence inflicted. And he blew up at me. He brought up the 1992 riot in Los Angeles saying, you see, America has it too, not just France. So I laughed at this. So anyway, because of those riots, Sarkozy was elected. My friend Malmsbury points this out and as a supposed law and order hardliner. And I'm maybe a kind of immigration skeptic, but not really, but nothing changed. Just like right now I'm hearing Meloni in Italy, though she had very different background from Sarkozy. She actually came out of a street fighting fascist background that then strategically

turns with a center right face. But she ends up being a loser too, the borders of Italy wide open to migrants. But at the time Sarkozy's relative weakness caused the French hard right to go in all kinds of absurd directions. And this led to Sarkozy's replacement by the left, which of course made matters far worse. Because it was due to this replacement, this political change in France, Sarkozy losing I mean, in large part because the French hard right abandoned him. But because of this, you had the invasion of Europe in 2015 encouraged by Merkel indeed. She said things, but she would have never done it without France going the way it did politically. I mean, away from the center right and toward the center socialist left.

And as a matter of fact, I may mention here an interesting thing, but that bears some thinking upon the purity of, well, Sarkozy is a cock and this and also, okay, you rejected the cock and you got population replacement event in 2015 in Germany. But there is an interesting event again that happened because of Sarkozy's dithering or around that time. Do you know about Alain Sorrel? I posted before a clip of Alain Soral where he attacks feminism on Marxist grounds. And I don't actually believe that clip. I think an economic explanation for feminism, the claim, for example, that feminism was cynically introduced to expand the consumer market or to lower wages. I think such explanations are still wrong in the end.

But his Marxist attack on feminism, as a tool of capital machinations, is useful for trolling the left. But that said, Alain Sorrel has long been fixture in French public life. You may not know of him in the United States. I like his manner. I like his French intellectual way of speaking. In 2009, I think, or around then, he's tried to set up a party with this black comedian And this was also done in part, I tell you, I repeat, to Sarkozy's conservative failures. But what was the program of Alain Soral and Dieu Donné party, or NGO, whatever you want to call it, political front? It was basically a kind of political anti-Semitism, which they couched it in the cowardly language of anti-Zionism instead of actually talking about real Ashk subversion, which would mean

criticizing the program of the left and of Marxism for the last few decades and so on, which they don't want to do, and of anti-colonialism, which they couldn't do because that was their program. And then they tried to focus the right on Marxist economics and an alliance with Muslims and with third world populations against, again, supposedly a leftist nationalism or in opposition to neoliberal globalism, supposedly promoted for capitalist reasons by American imperialism, and to this they contrast the virtuous poor of the world. Fidel Castro, Vladimir Putin, absurdly, but Fidel Castro, Vladimir Putin, Hugo Chavez, Patrice Lumumba and Thomas Sankara and other such Afro-Marxists. This was a poster, a political poster of theirs

from the time, I think it still might be, they praise Hugo Chavez, they want to emulate does any of this kind of sound familiar? Third Worldist Marxism, repackaged as left nationalism and anti-Zionism, alliance, well, it's explained in the Third Worldism, but alliance with Muslims and POC against the depredations of international neoliberalism. It's the Kanye campaign, and it's the future possibly of a major branch of American nationalism, with American in many quotation marks. And to what extent this program of Sorrell and Udone was consciously copied in the United States during the Kanye campaign, which was run by GOP consultants, by the way, this is not even a secret. But I don't know to what extent it was consciously copied, but it's nearly identical in ideology and message.

And I'll have to write about this. It's quite interesting, quite interesting, again, to how major GOP consulting firms were pushing the Kanye campaign. It's public record that they faced no questions, not to speak of consequences, no questions almost from leftist media or mainstream media, whatever you want to call it. It's rather odd, is it not? Almost as odd as supposed conservatives writing weekly articles about me in the New Statesmen or the Daily Beast or generally what they do is recycle Antifa's so-called research on me. So it's either conservatives writing in Antifa publications or Antifa writing in unheard or compact magazine, weekly articles about me, and no one finds this odd. Mitt Romney, I am sure, will eventually write about the urbanite cock bap in April 2024, maybe.

Mitt Romney, on the danger of racist neoliberal urbanite bap, featured cover story on Mother Jones in, uh, 2024. National story. But I shouldn't let their fair game tactics get to me, I suppose. Mostly I ignore this, as you know. But yes, the Soral du Donne campaign, I'll have to write about that if a French friend does not want to. It's quite interesting what happened with it. What happened with it was a predictable crash and burn Soral on that program got something like one percent of the vote and prior to this he had run I mean just prior to this he had run Le Pen's Front Nationale into the ground by injecting marxoid economics into their message So Le Pen did much worse in that election in which Soral had run some of this PR than in previous elections

The French right, the French people have no appetite for this third-worldism and traditional socialist Marxism, you know, especially also in the United States, no taste for this kind of vulgar, performative anti-Semitism. That's not even sincere because once these people are scratched even a little bit, they can't explain their position beyond slogans about religion or victimization stories about the Palestinians asked him about Qadhi and they think he's a Zionist traitor too. But anyway, I come back in a moment to talk about the French right and the goings-on and the riots there. I must take a break, but I do hope Bannon or a friend of his is listening to this show and will perhaps get over his theory-cell embrace of a so-called multiracial working

close democracy and will look at how attempts to abandon the middle class base of the right, the modern right needs a middle class base, it always has, and look at how attempts to abandon that have fared in Europe and how they will fare in the United States, but anyway I come right back, I must take a quick break. Do you like new trend of putting collagen in energy drinks, it's not that new, at least for a year or two now that have good brands come up, I think I have in mind good recipe. Would you get, I wouldn't call it Bronze Age energy drink or anything directly related, but would you be interested in cosmonaut style energy drink with collagen? I am thinking this. But so, where was I talking?

The failed attempt of a segment of French right to adopt a marxoid anti-neoliberal post-colonialist discourse actually to propose an alliance with the very type of people who are rioting right now on the streets of Paris and other cities, for which the French people in particular, the middle class voters of Le Pen's party obviously had no appetite. But in any case, after this, after 2009 or 2010, the French right decided to move entirely away from that and in the direction instead focus immigration restriction because they saw what a failure that kind of messaging is. But this messaging is useful for, let's say, an edgy commentator entrepreneur because it dissociates him from the key concerns of the white middle class, the boomers, and it allows

him to move, or so he thinks, it allows him to move in a leftist intelligentsia biome, and so it has a persistent appeal to edgy rightist intellectuals, as you are seeing now in the United States, because aside from a very few tweaks, this kind of leftist nationalist Nazbol light, it's being promoted also by dissident sphere in so-called dissident sphere in America, up to and including magazines like Compact or even a lot of the things Bannon says and that whole thing, and everyone else who is trying to recast the struggle, supposed struggle between the enemy being neoliberal, they like this one, neoliberal capitalist globalism on one hand, on the other hand native peoples and traditional ways protecting themselves

with a wholesome socialism, solidarity with the global south against the depredations of Anglo-Capitalism, this kind of language you've seen. The white men invented gay as a way to spread AIDS in Africa, and many such views. I'm tired of this retardation. Let me take another tangent to remark something on this facile communitarianism. The neo-intellectuals of the post-liberal right, so-called, including the fools Patrick Deneen, Vermula, and all of them who so piously invoke platitudes like the common good and that phrase and such, such a manipulative phrase. ever bothering to address the really pressing question what is common what binds different people into a common and I'm not picking by the way on a relatively obscure new right faction the so-called dissident post-liberal right

because actually they shared the same delusions with the left the left that also wants to prescribe and force community and never thinks about where it come from what it requires what the true purpose of community is whether in fact it would solve this dissatisfaction that they confuse for alienation and I'm talking about the few leftists who remain or who are well-intentioned but to these questions namely what binds people to a comment which they only ever provide lies because they're cowards and lazy for example I do not accept I have common bond with an old hag I've never met or that I have an obligation to her to wear a dog muzzle because you were told that breathing causes disease to spread and to kill old people, which remember, all of these people were rabid supporters of the

lockdowns. I don't mean just the left. All this part of the so-called dissident right were for the lockdowns and the other tyranny imposed on youths in the name of the olds for the last few years. But this lockdown measure, they all defended a measure that robbed 10%, in some cases if you are 20 years old, they robbed 10 or more percent of your life in the name of the common Good, so-called, and in school you are clobbered over the head with demands that you need to dampen your expectations, to restrain your ambition, to accept a lessened horizon of possibilities in order, why? To help the marginalized, the poor, the oppressed, and it is this rhetoric that an intelligent and ambitious youth is faced with today, and not just rhetoric, but actually a harsh reality

of repression of his own life, of his own possibilities, the name of the so-called Common good in the name actually of racial communism which you're seeing play out in France now by the way. The average Frenchman goes to work to pay taxes and pay for the way life of the migrants. No they do not provide cheap labor. I'm sorry to tell you for all your theories they provide no economic benefit at all. They live on public assistance at least by the second or third generation fully on public assistance. If it had been done for cynical capitalist reasons you'd have again excuse if I repeat But you'd have a situation like Gulf states where they do not bring their families. They don't get citizenship

They live in barracks and are guest migrant workers, and they certainly don't have the state stomping for notions of multiculturalism And such as you do in parts of Europe, but that's not what's happening in Europe or any of these countries It's all done by leftist politicians not by capitalists It's done by leftist politicians importing an underclass client voting bloc that they can then demagogue with communitarian or excuse me pseudo-communist rhetoric and then they can milk dry and terrorize the white taxpayer to support all this under again the rhetoric of compassion and of duty to the common good so there you're a slave paying taxes so they can have children that you cannot afford and these lying spineless cunts of the so-called post-liberal right they say

yes we want more of this same and the problem is we don't have enough of this And on this, by the way, they're entirely in agreement, despite all their Sophie's trees and hand-wringing and foot stomping that they are such edgy dissidents. You take your typical Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer above-it-all centrist. They share exactly the same views. You need a tighter dog collar. Otherwise, you're a Lockean, evil Lockean individualist. And wouldn't you want to be, you wouldn't want to be atomized, would you? So here's a dog collar. Let me put it one notch tighter for you. I have your community right here. Here's your community ready-made I'm selling you a community in this suitcase and you better suck Dua Lipa's engorged clit

Equality and reconciliation to what do these so-called solutions that the new dissident right so-called gives What problems do they solve what not to speak of the left because they did the same solutions But what possibly does any of this correspond to let me ask you whatever age you are Do you remember from your life any of these concerns having anything to do with what bothered you about life? Let's say in United States or Europe of last couple of decades three decades did any of this was so-called atomization or individualist alienation more of a concern for you that it was to the reality of being asked in most cases forced and Seeing your friends forced in some cases to put lives on hold to help out the community and the marginalized

So, what sense, I repeat, does it make to keep on going – oh, I'll go to the root of liberalism, as if the problem is with Locke or Hobbes or Adam Smith, which isn't to say that these are in any way my favourite thinkers or that I even like them. But they are coincidentally all very safe to criticise, and in fact, criticism of these same things is a mainstay of leftist academics. So then I ask you this closely related question also. As someone who in his blood, maybe, I have conspiracy in the blood. Isn't this what James Clapper say? He say Russians have plotting and subversion in the blood. Maybe I'm like that. Like the Ruskies. I'm not saying I do it well. I'm saying I've had this instinct in me almost like beaver.

You saw Vinnio of beaver who never having seen its parents, it was an adopted beaver. He grew up in an apartment. He tries, nevertheless, to gather all kinds of small wood-like objects to build a dam. In this same way, ever since I can remember, I've tried plotting. I mean, I've tried to make secret societies and many such things, literally since I remember. Since I was a very small boy, no one taught me to do this. I can only remember the entirety of my social activity at all was plotting and mischief and pranks and trying to form secret group or secret society. I didn't call them that at the time, but it was my only social activity. I tell you again, in general, aside from, you know, aside from this, I had a reputation to be head in the cloud, sperm-like, I'm not a sperm,

but looking out the window and such. And I usually had one very close friend, and I always tried to get him to plot with me, and we would successfully or not form smaller groups with other boys and try to plot in secret society for all kinds of mischief. And I never really stopped trying to do this. And why I tell you this? Because I've thought, as a matter of necessity, ever since I can remember, I've had to think, even if at first it wasn't thought out abstractly or consciously, but I've had, I've always thought, what is it that keeps group together? What, by contrast, if there is a contrast, is it that keeps a group of men together? Because I tell you that a secret society must have stronger bonds, far more real, stronger bonds than exist in families even,

let alone in nations or races, which are often quite contrived identities and such, But here the bonds are not of vanity or needing to be long or of mere birth. They must be real. They are matters of life or death potentially. You know, like a woman will have loyalty for her blood relatives and not for much anyone else. And that comes from her nature. But for a group of men to become an explosive and effective force, what is it that would keep them together? So of course I never approached this question exactly from this end. because when you begin from this end, you lose if you do. I approach it from the other end of already having something that inspired me and inspired men to work together and not so much having to think about these things abstractly.

But because I, a reflective person you can say, I came eventually to think about them in explicit concepts and so I could explain to others only for that purpose. But whereas I promise you, not one of these post-Marxist bastards styling themselves religious conservatives communitarians or anything else have ever spent any time thinking of this i can tell from the things they say and don't say and the same applies in general to the left but let me go on for all the talk of family i take this break now i need again to rest i will be right back come back i was saying that for all the talk of family and of community neither the new dissident right nor the new left in the clothes of the old marxist left have any idea what these are where they come from

what keeps them together. How many of you trust your cousins, your first cousins? It's very rare if you look in history, and yes I will get to Wagner group and other happenings and such in a moment, but you look history at all the casual betrayals, siblings even, engaging against one another and not only at history but you see right now fight over inheritances and many such things among notable people today. Yes, these bonds are exaggerated. They are imagined by conservatives to be much stronger than they really are. Even in the cases of families, whereas in the case of tribes even, not to speak of nations or races, they are almost entirely fantastical, these bonds. They're very easily broken. But in the secret societies, they have to be real. And this is why you know the KGB, right?

If you betrayed, they offed you. And they kill your family too in some cases. and it's funny, in collapsing states, the KGB stayed together and tried to see, for example, how to manage the affairs of a collapsing Soviet Union so that KGB members came well out of it, in the same way that the ballast of South Africa was thrown overboard by Afrikaner Broderbund, as I'm told this at least, they decided to let the nation go, but they kept for themselves benefits in the new order covertly, which I'm not defending these actions, although in the case of the KGB, As you see in the example of Putler, he was able to save his nation more or less because the KGB did that, because it kept that camaraderie. But the point is they stayed together when the nation did not. That's what I'm saying.

You know, it's not gangs ratting on each other and such. It's something else. It's what kept the Knights Templar together or the Teutonic Order for centuries. And I mean to say it's very hard. You need the most intense carrots, the most inspiring thoughts, the sweetest carrots, the harshest sticks, maybe. But as I never had control of a mafia or a state mafia like the KGB, I've had over time to think quite a lot about what means friendship, what means keeping a secret group together. And this actually is something that's within your reach. I don't mean to say that all of you should do it or can, but it's conceivably, I mean, within the reach of someone to do this or to imagine what's required for it. Whereas, you know, deciding the fates of nations and peoples and races and religions,

that's outside anyone's reach now. Yes, you'll submit a policy proposal to reform the Catholic Church in the nation of France, sure. And why I say this, because I know these wankers, I tell you, who go online and pile drive, right, pile driving, molding traditional socialists who talk about atomization and community and such, just like the idiotic left that has for 200 years now talked about the absurdity of a free society. They use this phrase, the dream of the socialist, free society. But these guys have never thought seriously about the answers to any of these questions I mentioned, because it's much easier to invoke edgy theoretical academic language that doesn't mean anything about the depredations of Locke upon the modern psyche. But they're

thinking and answering what it takes to keep a group together as such, because all they seek is a distinction, again, to be perceived as intellectuals, to go on TV, and then what What happens is they go back to their private lives with their fat wife and so on. And it's not so much that I care about their private life, but that in this case, that determines, I don't mean the way they live, but that ideal of a private life that I just described determines their entire worldview, which, let me tell you something about this. What is an idiot? What is the Greek word for idiot, idiotes? What does it mean? It means a private man. It means a guy who goes home to his wife and family at private affairs. his nearby community and doesn't think of much else.

It's like a cyclops without the physical nobility and the awe of the cyclops and some say the Greeks were a gregarious race and therefore for this reason had contempt for men who sunk into private life or family life. Aristotle famously says that men who live alone can only be a monster or a god or maybe a philosopher, somebody else says that, fair enough but there is a misunderstanding here what means gregariousness, there's a misunderstanding here just like in everything else that moderns put their slavish, tepid, lukewarm, lying fingers on. And the misunderstanding is in failing to make distinction between types of groups. In confusing, for example, a family, family relations, your cousins perhaps, or small sub-political family or tribal group.

And on the other hand, the fraternity of aristocrats are taking that fraternity of aristocrats and confusing them with a rabble called the people, or an amorphous nation, or some wretched pre-modern tribe under the thumb of old magicians, or the equivalent, today, these modern amorphous groupings that include donors and old farts and women and many such, which are totally unserious, right? Because if you're in a secret society, if you're, let's say, or whatever small group of men, not a secret society, a group of men who devote themselves to, let's say, a great scientific task or such, or if you're in order of Teutonic Knights or Templar Knights or other such, and one of you, he finds to go home to his wife, and that's his priority.

And he does your thing during the daytime hours for work or for money or entertainment, but his real priority is his wife at home, and that man is a traitor. And if this sounds extreme to you, this is why nothing gets done today, by the way, because of what I just said now, because it sounds extreme to you. Whereas if you took even 70 or 80 years ago, communists, let me say, not fascists because whatever you can say, but you take communists 80 years ago, or you take a group of scientists or artists with the ambition that French artists had in the 19th, early 20th century, and everything I've just told you wouldn't even come up, would have been a complete matter of course for them. But if you say now you're extreme nihilist, misogynist, you don't respect family, you

respect women, you're gay. Well, I tell you that any man historically who would have put his wife and private household as his number one priority would have been mocked in an aristocratic society, ridiculed as a stay-at-home, as a househusband, would have been laughed at as a hand-pecked creature, a woman-man, little better than what you call a cuckold now. And that's how these women- oriented males were seen. That's how. Or it would have been something seen may be appropriate for slaves or for calculating shopkeepers or formally though I dislike this slur because Nietzsche say it was already obsolete by his time but that this is the bourgeois this is the bourgeois this is actually what is meant by atomization by the way a male's descent into private family

life which really means a hand-packed husband and I found it to be an outraged when I sensed this kind of thing in a prospect for a secret society for example that he wouldn't put loyalty to our cause and mission above not Not everything else, but specifically this, this kind of frivolous thing, this private life of family and such. What an insult to be in a group of men driven by high idealism, let's say, for scientific or mathematical discovery. And to sense that one of you actually, this stuff isn't, you know, it's just something there, but it's actually, it's about his wife. I mentioned this in book, of course, the lactation rooms. It's an insult, not having, it's not the fact that you have a woman there as such that is

in Aesir, but the fact that the priority of almost all women, also the vast majority of males to be fair, but it's just this, their pettyfogging, blinkered horizon of care for daily life, for the family and such. And when these mamzers of the left and also of the post-liberal right, who aim to suck off the left, and they rail against Lockean modernity and whatnot, Lockeanism bulldozing traditional folkways, or the thread socialism and religiosity of the people, the POC, Saint shit. They are the ones devising to make you powerless and an individual unmoored from any potential for political potency. Let me ask, if anyone had proposed, if anyone proposes a solution like what I'm saying here, a fraternity, a real one, which really means, let's be frank,

a party core, a solution like I'm saying here, a fraternity, let's say, don't call it necessarily a secret society, but private men's clubs, let's leave it at that. They have been banned for a long time you know. It wasn't Lockeanism or liberalism in the sense the leftists mean. It wasn't capitalism that banned private men's clubs and the kind of associations I'm talking about now. They were banned in part legally and in part socially by people's, again, woman-centered morality. And to pick out just a few of the bunglers who make these arguments, Robert George and Vermula and Patrick Duneen, I believe they're all professors, right? And not Not just them. Many conservative intellectuals are professors. And I don't know the particular events at their schools.

I don't know their particular histories. But I will bet you that fraternities, which isn't even what I'm talking about, right? Because there's a big gap between Knights Templar and, you know, passing out on Bacardi while getting tea bagged and then working at Radio Shack. The Ameriquan college experience is Radio Shack out of business. I don't even know. Regardless, fraternities were targeted at all these schools, and I can bet you not one of these professors ever spoke up for really the only kind of union that can counter atomization or alienation or any of the other things they suppose are the big downsides of modern life. I know some events, for example, at Harvard the final clubs were targeted, I think some

time ago they said if you're a man who's part of any such exclusive all-male organization You cannot be the captain of a sports team. How absurd is that a sports team, which is also all male? It's but but that was the rule and I'm not aware of any of these people and so-called Conservative gentlemen's who spoke out or spoke out effectively against this or took a stand never they never complain about it Now it doesn't even come on that horizon In fact, if you try to make any similar organization now, they would spit on you They call you a fascist misogynist and many such and so you see none of this sketching about modernity and communities and its alienating qualities of liberal modernities none of this is serious at all because I don't want to

be forced to be part of a community with a roasty and an old hag and to be lectured to the dildo I don't want a dildo in my forehead mr. post liberal okay this process has been ongoing for some time the breakdown of all male fraternities and spaces because whether consciously or not the enemy understands that it is these unions that matter. These are what is politically effective. Anyway, so anyway, so much for the riots in France. It's just another jacquerie. You can almost use the equation to predict these things there, you know. It doesn't mean anything except another step down. I think you have to be almost thankful, be thankful for the intemperate nature of the migrants who were let in and the fact that the Congolese on one hand and the Muslims on the other

refuse to assimilate or cannot, because if they could, I think it would be far worse in the long run. This way, the folly of mixing populations becomes very clear to all. But that's something for the long run, in the short run, even if, let's say, it will lead to Macron being replaced by, in the next election, someone on the center-right, almost nothing will change because everyone lacks energy, because things are still tolerable for the spiritually wiped-out rebel, they're materially tolerable, and because things are so ossified now and boned up and dry that I've really come to think the only, maybe only a great push, only a great disturbance can unload any of this. Really, it's the gunk, this, you're witnessing the gunk of decades of rule by people

who should have been tilling fields and so on. And it's politicians who are responsive to the fact that at least 40% of the population, if not more, they will simply not budge on these matters because they're convinced the migrants and their descendants are poor and oppressed and marginalized and that any measures taken against them or against migration in general, that such things are fascist and so on. Remember Simone Weil, who apparently they're glorifying in a movie now, and seeing French soldiers in Algeria on TV and famously remarking that she felt the chill of Auschwitz or something like this, or things, you know. And of course, a million and a half got ethnically cleansed from there. And so, in theory, a million and a half or more of the migrants can get cleansed, excuse me,

peacefully deported from France and such in the future, but who knows? With the increasing docility and spiritlessness of the people, I think it's possible for a leader like Bukele to come, but whatever. You can blame it on Simone Weil's ethnicity all you want, by the way, but these views she expressed about Auschwitz and the French soldiers on TV and their big meanies, they're widely held and appreciated by a wide swathe of the population, and they wouldn't see anything to blame. They love these views, they won't budge. They believe in compassion for it. There may be no way to resolve this democratically, but only by measures like you're seeing now in El Salvador. But unfortunately, then, to reach the apocalyptic dysfunction of El Salvador

before Bukele came, because that apocalyptic disaster that was unfolding in El Salvador was the precondition for Bukele's ascent. And this is something you probably don't want to see anyway, and you will not for a long time. It was complete lawlessness, you know. I am just hoping with the increasing docility of the people that some bukeles will arise in the West more easily. Remember, nothing else will work. The yellow shirts in France, I had friends in America who were saying, well, we needed the yellow shirts in France and the election of Donald Trump stopped such a movement from uprising here, but what difference would it have made because nothing changed in France because of the yellow shirts? And I see the softcore porn queen,

softcore porn queen Eva something she ever ever something I don't know but she did champion the cause of Dutch farmers I think that's how she came to prominence but the uprising of Dutch farmers won't change anything either you know in the same way that uprisings also in Iran and Venezuela changed nothing because the people rioting and people doing this and that it's all jacquerie and peasant revolts and generally they do nothing at all and neither did the Brazilian people's uprising in the wake of the recent fraud elections there where they did what many of us had hoped the American public would do but despite shutting down highways and more not one Brazilian military man stood up and said yes I will risk this it will have taken just a few kernels do I mean to

blackmail you and saying all this no I just want to show you that nations and political machines are dead and once you see this it can be quite liberating can open up new avenue for action there should be no question I think of trying to reform these dead nations and political systems, trying to fix the mistakes of the left and to set right the human refuse they've demagogically catered to for decades. This is one of the repeat mistakes of the right. There needs to be a complete overturning of the democracies instead. I call upon the French generals. But anyway, you should infiltrate them as mafias to help yourselves and your friends and possibly also infiltrate them so that a future Trump, I mean hopefully one who will

not be beset by Trump's hesitations and his boomer patriotism, but a man who will be able to take, like the hot dog vendor almost did. Almost there, Prigogine. Only such a man can break apart his machinery, and he will need friends on the inside. But as for the riots in France, I continue. I hear friends say, European right friends, well, they say repatriation is the only option. Well, but how will you get there? And others ask, when will the French elites wake up? And if you see the account called Restation, he is good account, he suggests you read a book called The French Intifada by Andrew Hussey. And I have not read it, so I can't say, but it sounds good from description. It's the waking up of a normie leftist journalist, the fact that

what's going on in France has nothing to do with the tired platitudes of the left about the working class or the poor oppressed by the system. It's instead, he doesn't use these words, race and such, I would call it a racial matter, but incipient ethnic civilizational warfare of the low-grade, you know, almost a pre-machete variety. But the French elite, I think, sees quite well, unfortunately. See, it's not a matter of waking up because the truth actually is very plain and known to them. It's rather a matter of courage, which is much harder to solve. What can you do about cowards and a political system that selects for cowards only? Well, you have to dope for a man to break them. I don't know. As Reece Station, my friend who posted about

this book says, all of the foreign policy agitations and suggestions that you see coming out of Western governments are a way to avoid or delay having to deal with these much bigger domestic problems. I'll solve Syria because, you know, don't ask me to solve the massive violence and crime in North England. After all, I am just the prime minister of the United Kingdom. I can't be asked to solve these things. I can't. I can solve Syria. Ask me that. So I think under the circumstances, unless you accept my revolutionary, well, predictions that in the next 10 to 20 years you're going to have de facto fascism set up all over Europe, I agree with meritocratic friends from London Scene magazine, Jacque's on this. I think

in 10 to 20 years it will probably start in France, though it may begin in a smaller country, after which that example will inspire others to copy that this is possible but these governments will be peacefully or not replaced by others that have entirely different constitutions and will not respect these definitions of citizenship. And in that case the only thing actually that will matter is how United States will respond, how aggressive it will be against the transformation of Europe's face. And I suppose also how will Russia play into it which is unclear. Some of you believe, though based on what I cannot tell you believe this, that Russia Russia will help these inevitable, as I see it, right-wing European governments.

But recently you will note that Russia banded with Biden to overthrow Bolsonaro. I'm not saying Russia overthrew him directly, but if Russia had come out for him, it would have given much more latitude to Brazilian military to know, okay, we will overturn this election. It's an illegitimate election and here I'm a general, I will not put Bolsonaro in power, But I'll take power as an intermediary and reform the Brazilian constitution and such. But the reason they could not do that is because BRICS is a fiction, and Russia and China sided with Lula, you know? So anyway, that's speculation for another time. But I do think in 10 to 20 years, an overthrow of these governments is inevitable. They simply, courage or not, they do not have the money anymore to sustain anything but

But especially these huge populations that produce nothing, they are actually already poor states. They can't afford the luxury of this and they have a very small security establishment and so on. So I think it's inevitable. But anyway, so what will United States do then? That's the question. But if you do not accept this, what I've just told you now, if you hope for a more peaceful prediction alternative, I suppose it's possible that European governments will come to Danish solution. My friend Europe Esperance, a Danish, quite notable Danish man, I don't want to say about him, and we really fell out over the Ukraine-Russia thing. I was very much for Russia, he very much for Ukraine, and I hope he comes back because

even though he's probably crazy, he has better intentions than 99% of you mamzers. I know him, I met him, he is a, I hope I'm not being indiscreet, a pan-European meta-Nazi, but who, for practical purposes, decided to put on a center-right face. And he has very well-thought-out reasons for wanting that, and he strongly believes in the Danish solution, where Denmark, of all European countries, has, on the path at least to solving its migrant problem, and has an establishment, a social democrat establishment, that has incorporated immigration restrictionism as part of the program and ideology. This is what I'm saying. Even social democrats can be made to realize that they have to incorporate immigration restriction. Once we do that, we've won.

That's really the best you can hope for for politic, again, short of massive overturning, which will not come about by me or my friends talking online. It will come about with massive economic collapse and a man like Prigozhin, who maybe never went online, getting a glint in his eye and saying he can take a mercenary leader of some some type, but I tell you, aside from that, these social democrat establishment in places like Denmark, with whatever public hedging and cuckery arguments, don't pay attention necessarily to the public rhetoric. They've had very good practical results, but they've incorporated those views, immigration end, and maybe to have it all somehow done low-key in Danish style. This is what I'm saying.

Could that be a peaceful alternative without aggressive public rhetoric? And this could be maybe still done in a humane way, repatriation. For example, in the hopes or maybe some, I'm not saying them, programs, but some peace or programs for economic development in the Arab world so that migrants and their descendants will want to return there willingly. And maybe slowly over one or two generations there could be voluntary program of gradual repatriation, I mean. Because I don't know for all the rhetoric of civilizational and racial warfare, I'm not sure how much most migrants want to stay in northern countries. I was always surprised to see Brazilians in Boston. There were some villages from the state of Minas, I think, that had wholesale moved to

the United States and to places outside Boston. How could you enjoy being in this miserable climate and a culture so cold and alien to your own, so different? And no, they do not in fact enjoy it. Many want to return to their countries, just like many would want to return to Central America if there were many bukeles. So anyway, these are all speculations. But what do you want me to say about St. John's Day Bonfire Feast in Paris suburbs? You see, they are pagan. This is a pagan uprising. They are celebrating midsummer in Paris. That's all. I'll be right back. Not discuss affirmative action on this episode because it's a big matter that I have many thoughts on I think tied a many problem American society far beyond affirmative action, more

generally with accreditation regime in America, where you look to a place like France, where at least for elite selection, there is no affirmative action, I think they all attend places like École Normale Superieure, where the entry is still largely meritocratic. And In most countries, college attendance is not necessary for a job, and it's been made so in the United States, and I want to talk about all these matters. I'm probably topic-worthy of an entire episode, including the problem of the Chinese and what role these had in the development of affirmative action and sanity in the United States. I think it's a bit counterintuitive, but I will have lawyer friend who knows this matter of affirmative action inside and out, either on next episode or the one after, to talk

the legal matters and the intricacies of this ruling, which I cannot comment on, except to say that right-wing friends who are in law are a little bit upset with ruling. Some like it, some think that it allows for loopholes, so I don't know. I think we should not blackmail in the wake of such an event that drives the left so insane. If the left is upset, at least in the immediate wake of such ruling, we should shit on head of the left. But where has the Russia story disappeared? Do you remember when Prigozhin made Dash for Moscow? I think it was on Friday, and people say the Russian government shut down over the weekend. Nothing gets done in general or very slowly, which is why he probably did it on Friday, why Ukrainians apparently begin their offenses on Fridays.

But when Prigozhin did this, do you remember the speculation? The most useless of all were the bastards of the expert class in the mainstream press who not only had no accurate updates on factual events, but they only had the most insane predictions all given with full certainty that here was the end of Putler, here Russia would break up into a hundred pieces and a hundred years of Sengoku civil war. For those of you who are not weebs, the Sengoku refers to the hundred or so years civil war between Japan's warlords and it ended with the establishment of Tokugawa shogunate around 1600. It was a great time when men of power and innovation arose in Japanese society like Toyotomi Hideyoshi Hideyoshi, who almost became Shogun, having risen from surf position entirely through

his genius, and then he tried to almost do a co-prosperity sphere on Asia. He tried to take Korea, it didn't work. And only war shows the worth of men. I believe in this. It allows men like Hideyoshi Tommy to come up in the return of upheaval and violence. I believe in this. It shows the worth of men. The manifold innovations that took place in Japan of that time is because of the war. Be careful what you wish for then regarding Russia. But in any case, none of this was to be. It was all fantasies and instead Lukashenko come in. This is the rise of Belorussia. Perhaps Belorussia will go all the way to the Pacific now and will take the leadership of Russia. Belorussia means White Russia. That means they are – it's about white power, right?

So he brokered some agreement, which I will tell you what my sources in the Kremlin say about the real nature of that negotiation that ended the coup attempt. But it ended so suddenly, and it showed all the experts who had no idea that this would even happen in the first place, showed them for total fools, so then they went back to calling Pringozhin a terrorist. He was a terrorist before, then for two days he was a hero, and now he's a terrorist again. And Prigozhin said it was a march for peace and justice. It's a million men march, millions for Mumia, millions for Mercs, millions for the Manzer. Unheard voices have started speaking in Russia. That's what you saw. And you have to say that threatening bureaucrats with your army to give you more monies and

better contracts, it's an alpha move. But look, no one speaks about it because it embarrassed many of them and because no one actually knows anything. opaque and I held my mouth over the weekend although many were encouraging they say Bap you need to do Sean's this because it's about mercenaries and you know but you know it's Russians they are all doing the 100 step conspiracies on each other and of course the conspiracy breaks apart and changes at step five and so then I say to you can't you wait until Monday to see what happens to pronounced before looking like imbeciles. Don't you have this prudence by now? And so now I wait for some days, and still almost no one knows anything what's really happening inside the country anymore.

There are speculations, but first let's see what's certain. Bryn Gozhin, mercenary warlord of Wagner Merk Group. He was not marching on Moscow to set up a Khodorkovsky. This is a shit-lib-backed, pro-Western, ex-Russian oligarch who Putin sent to jail, or Masha Gessen and other, you know, these are the intended Chalabis, if you remember that character from Iraq, but these are the intended proconsuls of the future Russia. But that's not what Prigozhin was going for, Western-style governance. They were doing it because the war in Ukraine isn't being run well, and men like Shoigu, the minister of defense, and Gerasimov, the chief of staff, but especially Shoigu, who's from the Soviet and Yeltsin eras, and he's a retarded boomer like all the people in that part of government are in Russia.

They're bungling the war and going on about, oh, we're fighting the real Nazis in Ukraine and all, worldwide solidarity with the oppressed and the reds and this kind of okay and it's not, the war is not going well and was completely miscalculated. And Prigozhin's success would have very likely meant a much harder line against both Ukraine and the West. So my friends Russians with attitude rightly pointed out that Prigozhin had massive support both from the Russian people and the military, the army specifically, so that it was only air force units who attacked Prigozhin's convoy and even then only skirmishes. Why skirmishes? Because in fact Russians do not want fratricidal war and Prigozhin didn't want that and that

would have been the worst outcome for Russia, maybe for everyone else, if Russia had really sunk into a 10-year civil war or something like this. But no one who was cheering for Prigozhin inside Russia, I think, wanted that. There are then all kinds of speculations about what agreement was actually reached. It was, for example, Xi of China, who was brought in by Lukashenko to essentially hire out Wagner and move them to Africa under Chinese contract. Why is this? Because it was never really clear to me why Wagner's upside was in Ukraine. It's a terrible industrial war, high casualty rate, low payoff. Why as a mercenary leader would you want to waste your men in that? As a warlord, you are measured by the number of men you have, they are mercs, they want

to live and fight again for money, they don't want to die in a retarded post-Soviet war, so my guess is Wagner Group wanted out of Ukraine, they were not allowed to be out, and this was a way to force maybe Russia to let them leave, and the compromise was this what I just said with China. By the way, Eben Barlow, the legendary South African soldier, a mercenary, founder of Executive Outcomes Mercenary Group, the outfit that single-handed ended the war in Sierra Leone. And then they went out of, it didn't go out of business, they had to cancel this group because African governments were getting freaked out about its successes and how easily it defeated state militaries. And now it's being refunded again. And I'm guessing it's being refunded with the blessing of the United States and the

Anglosphere and a hundred percent of the reason why you see a return of even Barlow and executive outcomes is because of companies like Wagner and their Chinese equivalents and that meddling in Africa you know in the service of African governments and so on supposedly but really meddling in Africa on behalf of Russia and China. So now the civilized Anglosphere and others are finding it the necessity to bring back the white mercs or else they will be faced with a 1,000 Simba rebellions backed by China. Look up Simbas. They're wonderful people in the Congo, I think. Mass-raping nuns and such. Truly Homeric. But anyway, this is why executive outcome is coming back in Africa. And even Bartlow, it's funny to see the evolution of... He has become a kind of African black nationalist.

He's promoting African nationalism, right? Easy to see why, as a way to counter the middling of Wagner and Russian and Chinese interests in Africa. Although, I'm told quite a large number of Africans themselves would like to see the return of white colonialism there. You may have wondered on this matter of the uprising of Wagner, however, within Russia, why I didn't jump to bang walls for Putin and such, and to say, I stand by Putin, he has to crush this, use missile, use the Tsar Bomba, use the Tsar Bomba on Prigozhin. And you can guess maybe why I didn't, I still like Putin, I think he's good for Russia, He's Putin has great improved conditions there. Data from 1999 to 2021, 650% increase in GDP, 800% increase in GDP per capita, 5,000 increase, 5,000% increase in gold reserves,

600% increase in health expenditure, 80% reduction in debt to GDP, 70% reduction in crime rates, 70% reduction in murder rates. all this while maintaining a migrant population of 12 million virtually unchanged since 1999, 8.5% of the population only, is there any counterpart that could boast these numbers other than Singapore? And I just read to you very nice information from tweets by my friend William Geis making the point that Putin is Russia's Lee Kuan Yew, something I too have said. Maybe history will see him as such. That said, it's hard to see what he's ever done for the European right or the right anywhere else outside of Russia for that matter. Whether out of path dependence of ideology or from Soviet era or because of old standing

personal operational ties between Soviet agencies and third world reds, Russia continues to support the left both in Europe and worldwide. One of the worst cases is Finland, where the politicians who promote migration and such are the ones who are Russia backed or at any rate are the pro-Russian ones. And for me, the big moment was in Brazil. I'm a big Bolsonaro fan. I've been pushing Bolsonaro for, I think, well over a year before he won, when he was nowhere on anybody's map, but I knew he'd win. He had it. And Russia came out for Lula in that election. I cannot really forgive that. You know, Lula, of course, proceeded to stab Russia in the back because, you know, but both China and Russia came out for Lula. Oh yeah, he's an old comrade in arms. He has the hammer and sickle.

as the upper left fist, we go Lula, it's like old times, Lula against the United States. Well, Lula did not side with Russia over Ukraine. And now maybe they have no reason to support Bolsonaro, but then what is put into me anyway, and I keep asking what has he done that I should so much care about, you know, what has he done for the right anywhere? It's true, in keeping Russia free from control of Western governments, maybe he denies this corrupt class of apparatchiks that rules over us in the West, he denies them another base that they could use to pilfer resources from, another place they could use, they could stage further troubles from. But that's somewhat speculative and that they could capitalize on, let's say, having a foothold in a dismantled Russia, I don't know if they could.

But if you believe Putin is ideologically or operationally a friend of white civilization or any such things, I don't see it. He may not be harmful, but I don't see any friendship and maybe many of you don't see again the close ties he maintains with socialist trash of the third world where it so happens I have many friends in South America, parts of Africa and such in Japan where they much hate Russia for the aid it gives to the local left or in some cases like that of Chavez and such to outright anti-white demagogues. And then there's the matter of the war in Ukraine itself. I told you at the beginning of this conflict that I wanted Russia to win because I did not want NATO and EU to expand further and so on.

And also regardless of what I want or not, Russia simply cannot tolerate Ukraine that enjoys NATO, et cetera, et cetera. That said, I was hoping for a quick and successful operation like had become Russian style. I remind you, Russia had some fast striking successes that are not seen by foreign policy of the West. It took over Georgia very fast with little or no loss of their own soldiers in 2008, I think. And it was a pleasure at that time to watch the hypocrites Condi Rice and Bush and such, they squeal about invading other countries coming right off the Iraq thing. The contrast between the quick Russian success and the American dithering in Iraq and Afghanistan was very obvious for the whole world. Then there was the Russian intervention in Syria. They just about wiped out ISIS.

I know Trump finished ISIS off, but it was Putin who basically had it mostly done before that, again while Obama and an impotent United States under Obama dithered in yet another lost conflict around Syria. You tend to forget these things now because of all the people who, for whatever reasons of their own, maybe they just want to be contrarians, but they see fit this year to make a big cry about how United States and Western governments are actually super strong and the regime is super stable, will last a thousand years for sure. But that's not how it was looking in 2016, which is why you had Brexit and Trump and Bernie and many other things happening because of the manifest failures of these governments. And these failures don't go away because they managed to steal an election or two.

These failures are not forgotten. But Russia's successes, by contrast to these, were very quick and impressive, and then there was the matter of Crimea. Russia had flawless operation taking that land back. Lutevak, who now, Lutevak, you see him criticise Russia and Putin, but I remember him saying at the time, this is how it's done, this is why Russia rule 11 time zones. Because in this case, for example, they studied the matter carefully, including they had working groups on each of the Western governments to know how they would react, and then they end up taking territory and instead of uniting their enemies, their enemies become divided. And that's why Russia ruled 11 time zones. It's masterwork of political deviousness and strategy. They played it perfectly.

And so I was hoping for something similar in Ukraine now, but the opposite happened and it's a horrible war so that whoever wins now will be pyrrhic victory. And am I supposed, then, to remain for one year a clapping seal for either side? A year of this, whatever it is, more than a year now, I don't hate Ukrainians. Their country will be demographically crushed after this, they'll have run out of young men, and for what? And yes, I know it's the fault of their government and of the United States using them as kamikaze against Russia, but I can't also just cheer Russia doing this and bombing, you know, the The action of Europeans, they took vacations in cares many Europeans have, they feel fondly for that country Ukraine, they see blonde children getting bombed every day and practically

day to day that's the reality of it, how can you cheer this on? You can't expect Europeans to support this. And most European nations, it's the people of these nations driving the governments to support Ukraine, it's not what you think. The German leadership would prefer to support Russia or to stay out of it at least but they have no choice. They end up being very pro-Ukrainian public and pro-NATO, but in fact, it's well known they never do anything they say. But they are forced to do that by their people, that public rhetoric. It's not, as you've been told, that the Americans are blackmailing Europe into it and the poor Europeans are living under American empire and they really don't want to support Ukraine, they want to be friends with Russia. That's not what's going on at all.

It came out very clearly in the election of Maloney, who yes, she's turned out on the matter of immigration to be a lying roastie who did nothing with that situation, but the matter of the war in Ukraine was litigated in that election, and many people, including Salvini, were making the arguments you hear on the dissident right circles and so on. Oh, Europe is going to starve, Europe will be bankrupt because of the sanctions, Europe should not be involved in Ukraine, we should be with Russia. But she ran as a very Ukraine hawk campaign, and the Italian people overwhelmingly rejected the other argument and embraced her, So this is a decision that's been made by Europeans. You can say it's a mistake, but not that anyone is coercing or tricking them into it

or that Europe being this pro-Ukraine against its own interests is somehow an example of American machinations and American power. Quite the opposite. I believe America is being pushed into Ukraine by Europe the same way it was pushed into Libya by Europe. But these subtleties, you're not allowed, they're not subtleties, they're just basic facts. but for some people they sound like, well, devious subtleties. But so anyway, it's a depressing post-Soviet conflict in Ukraine. I prefer just not to think about it anymore, but no one's coming out a winner out of this, no matter who so-called wins. I can't understand why a mercenary would want anything to do with that place. Africa is the land of milk and honey and koi-sen puntank for the mercenary. Don't waste your time in Ukraine.

Anyway, regarding Prigozhin, I told you I do have special informations. I have special insight into, some say, insight into situation from a source in Kremlin, the nature of negotiations that took place that ended the march on Moscow. Do you want to hear this? It was, remember Prigozhin Kriya before this? How did he become head of Wagner? He ran catering company. He still runs it. And that's what, before he became warlord, mercenary head of Wagner Group. Do not laugh. You can do it too. But that's what the negotiations were about. The real reason for the march on Moscow, the coup attempt was Prigozhin was trying to get Putin to accept catering contracts for FSB sub-regional offices, even outlets of the FSB security stations below the sub-regional level, whatever that's called,

to be catered by his company. And Putin agreed to $50 million contract during those negotiations over the course of the next five years, $50 million contract with a gun essentially pointed at, he said, to accept catering and particular hot dog catering contract for FSB sub-regional offices by Prigozhin's company. You have to understand here the deep history. The deep, Prigozhin started to market the western, the United States style hot dog in the early 1990s. He was tasked possibly by rogue elements in GRU Russia military intelligence as well as Network 7 of the Anastrani Atil to introduce the so-called, okay, because before this Russia, they have the coarse ground sausage, okay? They have various coarse grind style salami sausages. You may be familiar with the kalbasa polish,

something like that. So now Pringojan Kamen, he introduced the Western, the American style so-called neoliberal hot dog in early 1990s at the behest of rogue elements in the Russian state security apparatus working under arcane reasonings and it's been a long game a long March and now it culminates in this the negotiations overseen by Lukashenko at 50 million dollars for catering contracts yes do you like this theory but listen Prigozhin and his foibles aside you almost saw history in making again history almost restarted people say this because yes experts were looking and laymen were looking and no one could believe it many came up immediately with these kinds of wild theories that it's an op, it's a psychological, it's a

psy-op, it's done by this or that interest working behind the scenes and they are really running precaution because you know why wouldn't the man want one of the richest naturally richest countries in the world for himself he must be doing it for hidden forces and interests that you don't see because no one can believe that one man can change course events simply because he wants to take and yet this actually how it happens this is most powerful force in the world, and it works actually by mimicry. I mean, what does the first one, that's an important thing. But once it happens, I remind you that the first tyrants, how did it happen? They saw in Lydia, the kingdom of Lydia, on the western part of what is now Turkey, a man with mercenaries, he became tyrant king

of that country, and they see that, yes, I can do it too. You know, yes you can do, you can do it. And this is why Prigozhin excited me, because I didn't want to see of course civil war in Russia but a bloodless successful coup that would have been valuable for reasons that don't have anything to do with Russia or any particular country as such. See this what you have to get over oh this policy will save us this this Putin is going to do this and he will have these measures and he will save the right in other countries from the left from the Western governments I you have to stop thinking this way none of these events actually matter because all these countries are already dead. Putin is good for Russia sure but whatever value Putin

or Russia has it would have been far outweighed by the example the example given to the world of a man who takes successfully who so easily marches into power and overthrows a government which is why quite a few insightful frogs were rightly saying there is no way any Western government actually wants to see this happen, it would inspire too many naughty thoughts in other countries. And Viel Prigozhin turned out to be, who knows what there may be sequel, it may not be over, but he doesn't matter, the example does, and I say someone will give this example, I think relatively soon, because all these states are weak, plump chickens for the taking. I want to see a thousand Prigozhins bloom, imagine a thousand of them over the next generation,

Maybe with, uh, Mitt Romney looks, maybe you get, uh, Alvarado's, I want. I want this. I want the Sengoku world. That worldwide chaos is our only true salvation out of this prison. I am enjoying all friends to prepare. Yes, prepare for the great thinking of the next 10 to 20 years in fire of Sengoku. Until next time, Bep out.