this episode 141 Caribbean rhythms and you may have seen yet more articles about me this week and you know I am vain enough to enjoy the widespread attention on myself for weeks and weeks I can't complain this time it concerned political as this latest article on me in case you haven't seen there's almost one every week now I don't know what cause what causes this increased attention lately. I can only speculate. By the way, this show, I continue to talk about romantic and social life of ancient Greek mens, and so I will only spend, I want maybe just opening a segment, humor, my narcissism, as I talk about myself and the attention showered on me. Once again, I'm in the news. You will have noticed, though it's been like this for

For some months now, General Patton was a supposed conservative, interns for example at National Review and such, oddly getting to write about me in Daily Beast, or Sohrab of Compact Magazine writing about the neo-gnostic menace, the Nietzschean pagan menace in The New Statement. That's right, online establishment Christians get very worked up about five people writing about Nietzsche and paganism, and who like Homer, after their religion has been replaced by worship of the Holocaust, that does not concern them. But anyway, there is, I mean to say, before this recent political article, there is this new trend of conservatives attacking the frog right, you know, usually in far left publications and should raise an eyebrow, why is this National Review a striver working for the Daily Beast

an Antifa publication. Someone made this joke. I predict Romney will be writing in Mother Jones in 2024 spring about the desperately urbanized, decadent racist Bronze Age pervert, how we must reject him for family values. It's serious business. An anonymous account, you'd think, right? I have relatively small reach in media. Most, vast majority of people don't know about So why? Why now? Why this strangeness with the concern of a cock, you know, the same GOP lame old boomers panicking, that they've been panicking since Trump era and so on. Everywhere you see the GOP boomer fingerprints on the attacks against me. In the East bloc, there was something called the Komsomol. This was a communist youth kind of cadre, party aspiring striver apparatchiks.

They existed even in the 1980s when it was clear things were on their way out. Imagine being communist youth party aspiring cadet in 1984, right, as it's like being national reviewer, weekly standard intern right now, or compact, same garbage. So these you can imagine, the type of people, right, it's the worst kind of kiss-ass careerist, the kind of brown-noser for a sclerotic old party guard and late-stage communism, and And not even a good career at that, I mean it pays nothing. And that's the type of people attacking me now for some reason. So it's either, as I say, conservatives, oddly enough, writing in far left publications, the New Statesman and so on, or these conservative rags, they hire an outright antifa, really,

for example, hardcore whiteness studies type antifa from Sweden, and they rely on people not Google translating this person's articles that are in Swedish, to see how he crutches about whiteness and such. And such creature now writes for supposedly dissident right or dissident populist right magazines in America, and most of the output is again trying to dox, harass anonymous posters and such, and really to do what Antifa does, to raise up a mob against them or their families, to police the right, so that no original ideas actually get through to outside world. So they hope, but they make mistake because I have already bigger reach than their paltry circulation anyway. So that's not the matter, but I just bring up to you the oddity of it all, the conservative

Antifa collaboration, which if you listen to my show, I've talked about this for a while, but there's long been establishment conservative collaboration with Antifa against me and also my friends, the faction of truth, you see. Because I'm not right when you're left. I'm not a dissident. I just want the truth. I just want to speak the truth. These people are dissidents against the truth and good taste, also I might add. I'm a moderate centrist. That's me. I'm a liberal. I'm a liberal moderate centrist. I should go back to East Bloc and make a party in a particular country that does not at the moment have any interesting parties. I will call it the moderate centrist party. But that said, it's funny the unspoken part of all these hit pieces on me from all sides

is how they recycle the so-called research that was commissioned by one Luke Turner against me, and this is an Antifa, a major Antifa donor, funder, call it whatever you want, in London. That's what a lot of this comes out of, but these articles, they never acknowledge the source, right, and nobody else, it's all hush-hush. The original hit pieces that came out against me from his immediate Antifa employees got almost no views, but it's actually that so-called research that gets recycled. And so far, at least two European Marxists who are pretending in American context to be dissident populists, they have recycled Luke Turner Antifa, so-called research on me, nobody calls them out. Which, by the way, I've told you long ago that I never address

that. I would never confirm or deny these kind of petty-doxing attacks on me and such. Except to say that, yes, it appears many art girls and other such girls of high-taste girls from New York scene and other world, I think I am good looking and beyond that also like me especially for what I say, which okay, I'll get to that in a moment about, but you'll see why I bring this up. But all I can do now is call out the oddity of it all, the context of these articles and I hear that there are also other articles coming out against me soon from other big publications, we'll see if they get cancelled or if they go ahead with them. So on one hand it's to be expected, I think, because on one hand it's very odd that there haven't been more mass media articles about me, you know.

My book is maybe one of best-selling, maybe the best-selling, certainly far-reaching, right-wing, so-called, if you want to claim that book, but okay, in the last few years for sure, I sell, I do far better than any normally conservative book. Okay, look at Amazon ranks and such, and for five years now, a bit more than five years, And yes, I know friends are eagerly awaiting next book, it will come in more than one. But so five years and almost no articles covering this after they were claiming for a long time that they, well, what is this frog thing? We'd want to see a book, we want to see a statement coming out of this sphere online. And well, here it was, but no, it was untouchable, it was given the silent treatment.

Mike Anton bravely covered it in Claremont in 2019, but that was one case. And maybe you are not aware, but Claremont has a tiny circulation, and it was even tinier at the time. I personally, just me alone without frog friends, had far more eyes on me at the time than Claremont did because my book had already been doing very well from the day it came out. One point of correction on these articles, the only thing maybe I will address, the only factoid, they keep bringing up the Amazon rankings, but forget, maybe conveniently forget that actually got up to about rank 100 the days it came out, the week it came out. That's site-wide, okay? And that's like all the books, I mean, every year on Amazon, rank 100 out of them, and it stayed around 100 to 200, so around there for a bit.

And for a self-published book with no publicity, no parties, nothing, no marketing, I think that's quite notable, but mostly it was ignored by media.