reading, writing at night in empty restaurant or cafe, this episode 145 Caribbean rhythms on Argentina. Argentina election coming soon, but I like reading at night. I think city without a late night reading option isn't real city. Some of best places aren't actually even especially well suited study cafes, specialized study cafes and such, but actually diners I like with weird fluorescent light restaurant, even Dunkin Donuts, yes homeless sometimes come, but similar McDonald's outlets, I think this becoming more dangerous or at least unpleasant than I hear in the United States, I don't know, but I used to go read a 24-hour Dunkin Donuts in Boston. It was right near a special Masonic temple, very old Masonic temple, and and attracted schizophrenic street clientele during the evenings.

They used to play chess. Any chess place, we usually have the best vibes in the city if you're into, you know, in-cell street, schizo feel, and so on. But that was in the evening at night, was empty and enjoyable to read or do work. And I think chain restaurant, though, can be too small, constrictive. But I am saying you don't need specialized place like cafes that are openly intended for this purpose of attracting readers and students and such, which, when they exist, they're quite wonderful. In Tokyo, there is great place called Coffee Aristocrat Edinburgh in Shinjuku, a very Japanese name, Coffee Aristocrat Edinburgh. They would like Club Tropical Excellent, this kind of naming convention popular in Japan, but you can sit there as long as you like. It's very comfortable.

as they have high quality varieties of coffee, slight overpriced, but that's because you can sit all night. And it's full of young people talking and reading. They let you smoke inside. It's very convenient when you can smoke inside a place. I have found no other place at moment besides Japan where you can smoke in bars and coffee houses like this. I wish all cities had such, but you know, not every place can handle civilization. Not every place can cater to variety of tastes that Tokyo can. Let me just say as a tangent, this is what's amazing about online discussion of Japan. When it come up in political contexts, just the other day I responded to some leftist bungler who poses as a localist conservative, who was claiming that diversity in the society causes

raised IQ or some nonsense of this type. He was misreading some studies. And then you point out, well, places like Panama don't exactly have hybrid vigor, you know. There is also such a thing as outbreeding depression in biology. It's not just hybrid vigor. And on the other hand, Iceland and Japan are not really backwaters mired in poverty and obscurantism. In Iceland, people actually need an app to know if they are cousins or too closely related before they can get married. So more likely diversity as such, and it also depends a lot on the way you define it, right? Because you can have a very diverse society that's actually so tribalistic, and in this case people don't actually breed outside their small group or tribe or caste.

This happens a lot in the Orient, actually, for thousands of years. But anyway, the neo-cons and normie conservatives and much of the so-called pro-globalist faction, the people who openly would call themselves neo-liberal and such, when it comes to Japan, they have this narrative that it's a dying society. It's exhausted. It may be orderly and clean, but it's boring because it's old and exhausted. Nothing happens there. They have a moribund slow economy. It's not dynamic. This is what they say. It's not vibrant. Like the supposedly bustling marketplace that parts of America and Europe that are more diverse, more accepting of migrants. And that as this imaginary result have innovation and speed, vitality and such, and then some

well-intentioned but mistaken people on the anti-globalist faction double down on this. And they say yes, they would rather have safe clean streets and a boring moribund economy and society and no GDP growth and so on, they would rather have that than the chaos and crime that supposedly comes with economic and cultural vitality. And all of this is wrong, fake discourse on both sides. Each side bolsters the other's vanity. There's much discourse like this in general, by the way. For example, related matter, when religious traditionalists and social conservatives fight liberal advocates of modernity over this idea that we live in a carnival fleshpot hedonistic culture, everyone having wild sex going to Weimar style orgies, and both are fighting

with false assumption on entirely delusional shadowboxing arena. The truth is the opposite. I've been in almost no place, just to go back to this matter of economic cultural vitality or lack thereof of Japan, I've been in almost no place that is as youthful and exciting as Tokyo, where you can go at all times of day, you find a party, there are nooks and crannies and businesses that cater to every possible desire and niche, stays up 24 hours, it's actually hard to find places I hear, even in New York, that are interesting places at least, that are open 24 hours, and Tokyo has a much more, let's say, capitalist and bustling carnival field than these cities of America and Europe that are claimed to be dynamic, but things generally close much earlier, variety of businesses is much more

restricted and so on. Outside of New York, I certainly don't know anywhere in America that can begin to compete with Tokyo, and the crime and filth, even in New York lately, has not helped its, let's say, party dynamism. It's hurting, from what I understand. crime outside, outside on the streets, petty crime I mean. It makes people cocoon indoors. And in fact most of America, and increasingly parts of Europe, have a kind of depot economy feel. Large box stores, a centralized homogenized economy, as opposed to the wild variety of businesses you find in Tokyo. But again, simply considering youth culture, Tokyo has far more young field and these cities that are invidiously compared to Japan by people who've never been there.

What helps cities become night colorful most of all, if you want to go into the crime direction, is organized crime. And if you watch Tokyo Vice, for example, you can see that Yakuza bring much color, vibrance, indeed, to a big city. But in America and Europe, it's upside down. For whatever reason, organized crime isn't as active anymore, whether it got wiped out or went legitimate or underground, I don't know. But because of that, you don't get this nice off-the-books nightclubs and bars. Instead, it's just simian street-chimping, which I have to admit is most amusing. It causes sparks with leftist moralism. Just chill, bro. Yes, do you like this discourse? non-stop over the last few days has led to wonderful funny memes over what happened with

Antifa activists who was attacked by one person he imagined was his pet, but it didn't end up that way. I made posts on this. Unlike other people, I do not gloat and say, well, I do not say, well, I told you so. There will be no learning moment with leftoids, you know. You just have to mock them. There can't be no discourse with them. I just tell them, I fap to it. That's all. And this guy, you know, laughing at leftists again. There's no learning moment ever. They are mentally disturbed people, as amusing as it can be to watch them get wasted by the consequences of their own beliefs. There's not going to be any turnaround ever. Not when you let people like that decide the fates of cities. You can only make them a laughing stock for others.

Or, as I've tried in my, I think I did the best post on this matter, because it triggers, intensely triggers, as the left to use their own imagery like that against them. On the other hand, it is true that a tide of violence can discredit the left. It happened somewhat in Brazil, it happened in El Salvador, and it happened also in a different way to Israel, where the second intifada just broke apart the Israeli left, that's more of a political development. You can say the same about the Spanish left in the 1930s. But anyway, yes, I like some late night open cafes and restaurants is what I'm saying. And even when the city isn't lucky enough to have the facilities of a Tokyo to cater to creatures of the night, there are makeshift things like Dunkin'.

Or in Buenos Aires, I used to go to this place called Babieca, this is an Argentina show. And I have segment later on, special guest will join me. She will come to talk. There will be election in Argentina, I think, October 20. And she will come on to give report on situation there. Very interesting. All my Argentine friends say, Mille will win, we will see. I don't know if it's still open 24 hours, this place Babieka I mentioned. The pandemic just allowed places to scale down services. And many 24 hour places around the world, even bakeries and such, they never came back to that schedule. But it used to be 24 hours, it posed as a normal restaurant. They serve, I think if I remember right, it was mostly pizza. I didn't have the pizza, I had the very bad Argentinian coffee.

Excuse my voice, you can hear what they're doing to me again. I think the kirchenristas together with the, I cannot even say the name because it's a taboo thing, Like you cannot say the word for bear in Indo-European, or it brings that bear. When I cannot say New World Order, I have found out the real name. It's not Illuminati, it's something else. But I can't say the real name. It may have to do with a kind of floor that is a checkered chessboard. There is a portico on top of it. I can't say more, I have seen certain things recently. I cannot reveal more. But in Buenos Aires, pizza is a terrible mockery of what it could be. It's just cardboard dough, sweaty olives from a can on top of rubberized cheese. But they had this so-called traditional coffee

they bring you in a pot to the pastry and such and classics, French, schnitzel, ham, cheese, other so-called basics. But at night it was usually empty on weeknights and they, 24 hour, they put disco musics. had a, despite the fluorescent lights, a nice ambiance, and I went there to read and have coffee all night. But in fact, it was a gay spot of sorts. Right behind this place is the medical school, a block or two, if I remember. And in front of the medical school, you don't want to be at night. You will be mistaken for, you know, it's a street cruising spot. Did you see the Al Pacino movie Cruising? But anyway, it was empty. That's why I used it, let's say two or three a.m., however, you started to get drag queen. and often other assorted homos depending on the weather.

And like I would often go to a prostitute bar in some places and talk to prostitute. I like to hear their stories. Sometimes I, at this place, I would talk to the fags too. I have to confess I enjoyed also narcissistically the attention they would shower on me sometimes. But mostly I like to watch the freak carnival at 3 a.m. They walk in their antics, extreme drunk, high on whatever drugs, drag queen with heavy voices, a clown man screaming. I cannot do that voice. But did you know Ibuprofen is apparently has Viagra-like effects? I didn't know this, but this is the kind of thing they tell you. I don't recommend it, by the way. It's widely used, but Ibuprofen will crush your stomach, I think. Another one told me he snorted Viagra, he crushed it up finely into a powder,

and then snort through nose, and apparently this way it has cocaine-like effects. But I've never tried this, have any of you tried? I don't recommend. But fluorescent lights are a disaster for mankind. At this point, when I went to such cafes, they were not universal, and again I enjoyed the solitude of reading in this bizarre restaurant where, when you have neon or fluorescent lights, it's appropriate for this kind of depravity, but they shouldn't be... Now they are used everywhere. It's a disaster. But I like to sit there alone and then the jolly drag show will come in late and the real Fellini-like scenes... Look, this is just a small thing. In fact, Buenos Aires, which I will discuss briefly on this episode, when I first saw it, let's say, I don't remember if it was 2007 or so,

I spent a long time in it, around then and thereafter, some years, cumulatively, must be two or three years at least. It was a kind of realm of freedom, that's how it felt, because it was both more or less safe enough to walk through at any hour, but also grimy and underworld, much like Vibe, you see, if you see a Scorsese comedy movie, After Hours, which is about Soho, New York in the 1980s. And that was very much what this was like, with at least two or three mafias. The Russians, but also others, were operating freely, so there were amazing off-the-books nightclubs, open all night into the morning, and many secret levels of such that you could get into if you knew how, if you knew. And besides this, even its supposed normie establishment,

it had bars and nightclubs in 19th century palaces, many levels high. I have not seen that level of luxurious nightclub or cafes during the day for that matter. Very comfy old cafes to watch people and read in. You know, that's the thing about Europe, there is now everywhere of course good hipster coffee, but the hipster coffee bars, very industrial feel, there's almost nowhere to sit, and you You go major European cities, Rome, Paris, Lisbon, and such. I think I hear Berlin is the same. I've never been to Berlin. I would never step foot there. There is a warrant for me in Berlin. But any other place, very nice European city you could go to, all the cities of Spain for that matter. You go Barcelona, Madrid. They have wonderful restaurants.

They have very nice coffee shops, as you might imagine, in hipster area, but there is no coffee or cafe culture where you can comfortably sit and read. All the benches are extreme, uncomfortable, wooden, narrow bench to make it super uncomfortable to sit for a long time. And there are very few places in the world that have comfortable place to sit. So actually Tokyo does, I hear from friends that Gulf states have comfortable coffee culture. Some friends say Oman, very nice for this. And then in South America they do, but Buenos Aires most of all has the most comfortable cafes I've seen anywhere. Plus it had amazing advantage of European style layout, so it was walkable, if you want, it's walkable. buildings, beautiful parks, first world facilities, and above all it was super cheap.

And you know, that's the thing, it's cheaper now, by the way, because the economy's completely crashed. So if you want to take advantage, perhaps Mille can turn it around, but you can go for a vacation now in Argentina, it's enormously cheap, just make sure you don't take money out of ATM or use card, you have to use cash, dollar and exchange in semi, they're not illegal I don't want to make it sound romantic because everyone uses them. You have to exchange in, they're not black market, it's called blue market, semi-gray market exchange places because otherwise the government has set the exchange rate at a completely fake rate. I think Lebanon does this too. So you can get real rate either if I hear bitcoin is used or just get cash dollar and exchange in these places

that I think are still owned by Russian mafia. But you know, that's the thing when people talk about we want an art scene like existed in 1920s Paris to come back and such. But when you look at places where that is kind of happening, like Berlin until recently, that was because it was cheap enough for the young people to live in. But it also had facilities and cultural resources and such. So in other words, there are cheap places in the world. I imagine Nicaragua is cheap or Cambodia. But you can't go to Cambodia. The city there is not really a city worth talking about. You don't want to go to a small village in Laos and live on dirt floors. You cannot have so-called burgeoning art scene there with many artists and artists adjacent congregating.

You need a relatively first world class city. And Paris was very cheap in the 1920s. Ideally, New York would be such a place now, but despite the crime and the filth that's been arising in New York, the prices have not come down from what I understand, which is odd. But maybe they will, who knows? In any case, I had high hopes that Buenos Aires, which has been cheap since I've known it, but now especially so, but I was hoping it could be such a refuge for a group of people who could live there, dedicate themselves to a real avant-garde vision of decadence that could eventually lead to a total cultural overturning. Do not ask me to elaborate on this now, or maybe ever explicitly. I have quite special ideas on what is needful. And much of the right wing, so-called right wing discourse,

all of the bent over the last few years in this direction has been very counterproductive, let me put it that way. It guarantees its irrelevance, its lack of a future. This kind of, you know, pose, this vibe of an old man stomping his cane, raging with spite, with spite and spittle at his mouth about the degeneracy, it's degenerate, it's degenerate, and this word, and they can go on then on a jeremiad. That will surely make you win, yes, but the only good thing the right has done in the last few years has been Trump, big thing at least, and that's because he's not really from the right, but from something else, and he brings fire and energy and the spirit of youth and possibility again. The future of Budapest and Moscow is unfortunately already written, the efforts of Reagan-Orban

and Reagan-Putin, notwithstanding, because the young people there have a quite different orientation, let's say. But again, that to be discussed on future episode. I wrote article about Argentina and what's happening there with Milay. This is Javier Milay, the new Trump-like man of mad hair, who has driven fire into the hearts of Argentina's people, and it was a very broad following, actually, among the youth of that country. And just like the left was destroyed and let's say El Salvador because of the crime, it got so bad, and so to some extent the left was discredited to a pre-Giuliani New York also because of the crime, but, excuse me. And again, you can take Israel, the terror violence in the early 2000s, such extreme situations discredit the left.

In the same way it's gotten so bad in Argentina that the establishment there has been wrecked not only because of its economic disasters and the depressing possibilities it presents to its most creative and ambitious young, but also because of the pandemic. In Argentina, it was actually viciously enforced for two years. It robbed especially the youth, and it robbed them for the benefit of the old and the neurotic, especially the neurotic, middle-aged, harried and women who are especially hysterical tyrants. And maybe, this is my hope, that the Javier Millet election is really a first comeback, that yes, the youth portion of a country in which in Argentina, the youth demographically make large portion of the population still.

But let's say, they will say, we're taking things back from you. You locked us up. You stole 10% of our lives. We're going to push you out of the way. You're done. I hope so. This is what happens. Because in this context, you can see the economic disaster that's unfolding in that country over the last few years. It's really an extension of the pandemic measures. I don't mean just the consequence of those measures as in the pandemic made the economy worse, but that both are really an expression of the same thing. The moribund, the vampires, the old and the weak, banded together for some time now to suck all the life and energy out of a country and really to imprison its intelligent and young in a kind of depressing swamp of lack of possibilities. And that's the way the economy of Argentina

has been arranged for quite some time, again, of which the pandemic is only the worst expression. In some sense, that's what's leading, I think, to the resurgence of people like Trump and Bolsonaro all over the world, I think. And it even explains aspects of someone like Macron in France, who was in the same way trying to break out of an ossified apparatus that feeds the pods of the small soul at the expense of life force itself. You watch this horrible movie, I think it's called L'Oberge Espanol, if I remember right, the Spanish Inn or something. It takes place in Barcelona. It's about a variety of European youth, so called, who are there on the Erasmus program, on their foreign exchange. It's a foreign exchange student program. It's one of the most disgusting movies I've seen.

The ultimate European common market bug man movie. And you see the low horizon and low ambition of the new European man that's been planned. And I know that Macron himself is kind of part of that, but the energy he's tried to bring and the promises he's brought implicitly is that something can change, that there can be something more than you go to work and have espresso after you go home to IKEA apartment, go to work, and this small-souled kind of European last-man life that America, as bad as it can be, and I have many friends who have left America because they consider it a sheep-shearing scam operation, but at least it has a kind of Trumpian energy in some of its parts, a lust for money or for materialism that exists also, by the way, in East Asia.

If you watch movie Crazy Rich Asians, that is why the East Asians love Trump, the expression of the lust for this kind of opulence. You can call it vulgar, but at least it's some kind of desire, whereas Europe, although it has a small right-wing scene, which I hope will win out, but on the average case, the European, I don't want to say the European man, the European being, whatever you want to call it, the creature of Europe now, is completely washed out, there is nothing in them. And I thought maybe even Macron, as global homo as he is to use, to use Chateau Roisi's words, but even Macron maybe represented some desire of the spirit of some portion of France to break out of this. But France is such a complicated place and his hands are so tied that well look, that's a very special case.

But everywhere is this resurgence of, let's say, capable and energetic people who are tired of being parasitized. And I think it's been misinterpreted under names like populism, even nationalism, and so on, which I think are really secondary phenomena, not the core driving the tumult around the world for years now. Because you can then ask, populism for what people? The Argentina case shows this very clearly, because Javier could be said to be a populist for the middle class and the upper middle class, in other words, for the, let me be rude, let me be a rude racist and say the white people of Buenos Aires who are the people who built that country and who are the descendants of the people who built it. And maybe he represents their populist aspirations,

whereas the ruling establishment considers, well, if we bring in Bolivians and Peruvians, Those are also people, and they're already here, and we represent the desires of the people. We are populists. But in any case, look, there's almost no nation today where the people as such exist as a folk and can even play the pretense of a unified whole. So a world like this, populism in the hands of intellectuals, can be used actually to squirt squid ink and obfuscate what it was that actually drove Trump, Bolsonaro, Salvini, and many such anti-establishment insurgents to positions of leadership. However, briefly, the fact that they failed or not, it was usually because of a personality quirk on their side. It wasn't because the opponents were so skillful

or that there are systemic obstacles in the way. I think a capable Salvini or a more resolute Trump could have absolutely broken through all this machinery. They are actually quite weak to have let these people become so prominent in the first place. And it's something, the rise of such men, I think, of Trump, for example, something no one really could have predicted in the early 2010s even. So whatever his personal faults, and he very well may be over with and so on, but whatever his personal faults, it doesn't change this calculation I'm talking about that there seems to be a spirit throughout the world, and I think it's the spirit of youth that wants to break out of these clerotic structures. I'll talk on this episode briefly about the article I wrote

which got, I was not expecting this, the article I wrote about what happening in Argentina in Mille, it got spread everywhere on the internets. Everyone has been talking about it, even Tyler Cowen, not saying I love Tyler Cowen, but he has never linked to me and he's a normally very cautious man, very reserved guy I am told, but he's now linking to the Bronze Age Pervert too, what does this mean? This article got translated into Spanish, It's being read, spread around by Argentine politicians. This is my understanding. So I'd like to talk about this situation in Argentina. And again, later in the show, I have a very nice Argentina lady, an old friend and a guest who has her fingers everywhere. Yes, she has insinuated herself into all sectors of Argentine society. Soon I will not say more,

but she will talk situation there. I hope you enjoy. I will be right back. I wrote about Javier Millet, his rise in Argentina, his, as I said, been making internet rounds much beyond what I expected. I wrote it for Men's World magazine, and I confess it was a bit unwilling of a write. I'm not very happy with the writing itself. I think the content is good. It had to be said. But the Royal Nationalist asked me to do something for this magazine, A Man's World, and I very much wanted to because I had not for a while. This is one of best magazines around. Great articles, attractive layout, entertaining graphics. It's many funny ads and jokes and so on. One of the best magazines. Asylum is also good. There are a couple of others. But in any case, I wanted to write something

and I wrote it rather fast at the last minute. I think it could have been better written, but so I was a bit surprised then by how much exposure it got. It got run around everywhere, much discussion. And I think it's because, writing aside, people are just very tired right now of what my anime young and my anime youth friends called the wholesome chungus position okay wholesome chungus what is it is something like left-wing economics although that's rather ambiguous but socialist like economic social democrat economics combined with social conservative position wholesome socialism often with religious ornaments and it ranges anywhere from mild pat Buchananism to christian and Marxism, but also many things in between. By the way, in this episode, I will not be talking about

the far right or the hard right online, which has also embraced many of these wholesome chungus talking points, or what others are called Maga communism, or Nazbol national Bolshevism, the Duginists, the Eurasianists, and many. These are extremely small, niche groups, which, even though I think they're wrong, they're so small they're not worth addressing, I have rather bigger targets in mind. I don't mean necessarily even Bannon himself, he's a major voice, but he's not as bad as what some of the people I have in mind say. But I mean people of that stature. And even a senator I hear, J.D. Vance, who is a man who I actually like, and I did not direct my article against him, but he responded, I am told, indirectly to points I made in my article. It got spread quite a bit around.

So even though I didn't have, for example, J.D. Vance in mind, I have people, let's say, of that stature. You can consider also Compact Magazine, which is a worthless rag. I don't think they actually have real circulation. But it's part of a complex of new zines that have emerged out of the post-Trump GOP, although I want to say, and I will show you, I hope that it's really the pre-Trump Republican Party, a certain portion of it, but these complex of magazines like Compact Unheard, et cetera, that are pushing this kind of wholesome, chungus position. You can also think, perhaps, oh, I don't know, Josh Hawley, excuse me, Senator Hawley, when he come on air to talk about how men really need to man up and marry, and that they should stop playing video games. And these types of concerns,

some varieties of this are maybe defensible. But look, the purpose of the article is this Malay phenomenon in Argentina has just caused so much excitement there among the youth who feel literally imprisoned by that society and its wholesome talking points and doxies. So they go for the guy they think might destroy it, and he seems crazy enough to do it to most of the people of that country, and who knows if they're right. But because Millet uses some libertarian style ideas and language, many of the, let's say, the dissident sphere, and it's not only the dissident right, but the dissident left too, both of which formed in the wake of the Trump and to some extent of the failed Bernie event, let's say around 2016, 17. And to these people who, again, range widely,

I mean, you can count on this from everyone, from far-right people to, I don't know, the social democrat pinkos, again, of compact magazine who embrace a kind of religious rhetoric to more reasonable people like Bannon and Buchanan, who's not really active in, Pat Buchanan not really active anymore, so, you know. But also some of the people around Trump. I think it includes a lot of people. They're motivated or tangential off of Trump's destruction of the old GOP, which was animated by rather disingenuous libertarianist stalking points. I mean the GOP. It was motivated by some disingenuous libertarianist stalking points itself, or at least the rhetoric of free markets, that however, you know, it rarely actually delivered on this.

it promised, but because remember Ron Paul was destroyed and mistreated by the GOP. They did to him in 2012 primaries what the Democrats did to Bernie in 2016. But anyway, my article is not about libertarianism, but about the reptiloid brain knee-jerk reaction. Some on the dissident sphere, like I say, some of them have this reaction against anyone using libertarian ideas, even in the context of a country like Argentina that they don't understand at all and my point is how stupid this all is and how much they don't understand that the Argentine government in society has been very much run by Pat Buchanan style or what's come to be called Bannonite economic populism, leftist economic nationalism for decades and I went into

some of the results of what they are and it's not very nice. So my article was in so much defense of libertarianism which I don't believe in but against what has been advanced as its alternative since let's say 2016 or 17, 18 or so. I don't want to discuss libertarianism on this episode either. If I wanted to argue for it, by the way, I would, and most of my detractors would probably not be able to argue competently against me. But I don't believe in libertarianism, especially of the Cato Institute variety, I think that's a fraud. I think Ron Paul was genuine, but his inability to gain a mass following and to win national elections and contest them, that's something that should be studied. I think libertarianism, theoretically, becomes most interesting in the hands

of someone like Hans Hermann Hoppe, who extends the question to one of security. So in other words, who provides the physical security? And if you think that through, you arrive at the idea of private government. And so strangely enough, libertarianism in its teaching of absolute freedom, absolute economic freedom at least, but if you think it through to its logical conclusions, it actually can lead you back to monarchy. I think this is how Mollbach arrived at monarchy through the work of Hans Hermann Hoppe and some others he studied and and so forth. And then I'm especially interested in the other variety, the Icelandic Free State, for example, where you could get a judgment against someone, there were public courts, but there was no system, there was no public enforcement system.

If you wanted to collect on that judgment, you had to find the sheriff. And so there were kind of roving sheriffs or chieftains or warlords, call them what you will, who provided security for pay, and sometimes their territories, in fact, often it overlapped and so on, but it was a completely wild and free society where you could directly challenge another man for his property. I love this. I believe this is the true might makes right society, you know. This is why I'm a small government fascist, just like George Orwell was a small government socialist. But I joke. But look, enough for now. I think these alternatives are interesting, how workable they are, I very much doubt that the whole discussion of what is your favorite form of government, what do you propose,

does not interest me so much, you know. My book is not exactly policy proposals, let me put it to you that way. But it got answered, it got spread, this article. First my people who liked it, they're again tired of these wholesome chungus people as I call them, the self-righteous populists. On the other hand, the self-righteous populists and the religious fanatics themselves hated the article. And of course, they then revert to their usual anti-libertarian talking points. But again, it's not a libertarian article. It's just saying, I'm not saying libertarianism is good. I'm just saying you are stupid. But quite aside from the ideas of these populists, there is just such a self-righteousness, a complex of talking points that have developed around this since, let's say, again, 2016, 17,

when a number of leftoid intellectuals, on one hand, who were alienated by some of the woke things that were developing on the left side of spectrum, especially the gender ideology is what got to them, the tranny thing, the gay thing, and they turn against that as a focus of leftism, thinking instead that leftism should remain the so-called old left, the focus on class analysis and vaguely Marxist class analysis and so on. On the other hand, there were intellectuals from the GOP itself, the Reformicon wing, so-called of the GOP, and these were people who were formerly represented by Santorum. And Santorum, no one knows him anymore, but he was a kind of Buchanan-lite, a presidential candidate from Pennsylvania, I think, in the 2008 cycle or around then, I don't remember exactly the time.

But he was the electoral face of this wing of the GOP, which was Catholic conservative, friendly to the welfare state, and much focused on working class rhetoric and so on. You can see the representatives also among Russ Dowsett, among people in DC who call themselves integralists. Dows wrote a book sometime with someone else making very similar proposals. In other words, to mix social conservatism with vaguely leftist economic policies, or at least policies more friendly to the welfare state than the GOP had traditionally embraced, especially when it affected matters of family formation, promotion of natalism and such. These are big issues on this populist, national, populist economic wing I'm talking about. And with the coming of Trump, these two types of intellectuals

from the left and the reformicon GOP right, they sought to insinuate themselves themselves into, they got a glint in the eye, as I like to say, and sought to hijack, really, that moment to replace Trump's special focus with their own, in which they were greatly helped by the fact that many Trump supporters were banned during 2016 to 2017. So these face fags got someone to change the discourse in their preferred direction. But that's the reason to call these people wholesome chungas, is that there's such a self-righteous indignation, a noble, disgusting, noble indignation. They like to invoke, it makes them insufferable. You can so easily mimic their precious talking points. And I think my article, I'm saying I think my article is doing well and spreading

because many are just so tired of these sanctimonious, springish people. And what are their talking points? What do they talk like? You've heard it before. The impersonal machine of neoliberal Anglo-capital, the globalists, destroying the salt of the earth, working class communities, breakdown of family values through spiritual traumatization by capital, hypersexual commodification. You know, and Santorum, I like to invoke him even though he's now mostly forgotten, but I keep bringing him up from time to time because he, I think, really captured this spirit very well with obnoxious, obviously gay face, and you know, the kind of prim, GOP, well-manicured hair, Josh Hawley has it too, exactly, angrily championing what he imagined to be working-class values,

and it's always this strident type. They look very angry on camera. They have this incredibly unpleasant camera manner, inveighing against porn, neo-liberalism, sounding at times lately like Chomskyite college professors. You must embrace class analysis because you know we're the loser underclass oppressed by big bad top hat capitalists now, and these capitalists are supposedly promoting woke and identity politics for nefarious Machiavellian capitalist ends. We live in a condition of hyper capitalism, total deregulation, Robert Bell and laissez-faire, and that it is this that is ruining nations and this that led to the rise of Trump, who they actually despise. They are embarrassed by him and by his racism and so on, and they seek to turn that question into an entirely economic one,

and there's a whole tone about it, this hectoring, lecturing grim tone that's actually so very different from the tone of men like Trump, Bolsonaro, and Millet, who actually do seem to connect with people for, I'd say, very different reasons than this. Different not only in charisma, vibe, presentation, but very different, yes, in substance, which is to say, I think, this kind of economic populism associated with Bannon's name in America and with Le Pen's repeated failed campaigns in France, it's a distortion of what's actually vitally acting on the hearts of peoples now. The signature claim and lie of these bunglers is that there is a cynical neoliberal, they don't know what the word neoliberal means. I repeat to you, by the way, the word neoliberal was invented in the 1970s

by a German economic school that thought that capitalism was too harsh, So they said, let's temper the bad effects of capitalism to protect individuals, and so it's actually very much something close to social democracy, but it's really used by Chomskyite pile drivers against the reforms of Thatcher and Reagan in the 80s, the deregulation and so on, and they called that neoliberalism, because it sounds, you know, but the conceit of these people I'm talking about now is that there's a transnational capitalist elite, which because of cynical financial reasons divides us by race, whereas to fight them, we so-called could make a multiracial working class movement and so they seek to reduce all questions of race or national identity, national sovereignty,

or on the other hand of sexual conflict or the problems with modern marriage or modern relationships or the dissatisfaction that men feel in women and that women feel in men and many such thing, but they seek to reduce all this to questions of economic interest and economic class. To explain, for example, actually I posted it myself because it's good to troll leftists sometimes, these arguments, but Alain Sorrel has a very nice Marxist discussion of feminism. He interprets it as a capitalist conspiracy to lower wages and to increase consumer society humor society and to get more workers and so forth. Actually, I think that is wrong. I don't think you can find really an economic justification or economic explanation for feminism, why it came about, but that's a discussion for another time.

But similarly, they try to explain mass migration on the one hand or discrimination against intelligent white men on the other hand, in terms of some supposed economic benefit that large corporations are getting from this. Now I say in the article that these people may even be about 60% correct. And certainly there's a time to invoke the economic argument especially when you're trying, I say again, to embarrass leftists. To remind them that migrants are basically scabs that brought in large part to lower wages or in some cases to make it so that an American teen, for example, can't find it worthwhile to get a summer job working in agriculture where probably he couldn't anyway now, or in some other job like supermarket or so on that supposedly allowed them in previous times

not only pocket money, but a way to build resume. I'm making the populist case for them now because actually my friends and I use these arguments ourselves long ago in 2015, 16. So please don't talk to me about populism. I'm a better demagogue than any of you. If I want to be, if I ran public campaign, of course I never would, I'm not political actor, but I say just go the whole way. Why has not one of these brave populists ever proposed in public, as politician, or in their magazines, never proposed a debt jubilee? You want biblical kingship? Well, this I've said long ago, debt jubilee. But no one picks this up off table, the winning crown of populist leader, of a demagogue, very well, and here's what. There's a basis of truth from which these kinds of populist arguments start.

For example, the white working class has been seriously hurt in years leading up to Trump, in many parts of America, the Southeast, the Upper Midwest especially. Trump won them. These were the Reagan Democrats. These are ethnic white, mostly Catholic voters. Again, the Reagan Democrats, this what they are. They work in Upper Midwest industry and so on. And Trump won them, crucially in Upper Midwest where he continues to hold big popularity, even in the fake election of 2020, they couldn't do anything because his win in Ohio was so great, he won by 10 points. It's almost unheard of for a modern Republican president to do this. But he did this by running against outsourcing. You know, outsourcing to China especially, but increasingly, let's say, you get anti-China sentiment now.

So you know, but then outsourcing could still take place to Vietnam or the Philippines, who knows? It's the same thing economically speaking would still be very bad for that area of America. And it was in any case already taking place with Mexico, with NAFTA and such for some time. And so Trump ran against this and this big reason he won that area combined also crucially migration restriction because communities in upper Midwest, although by comparison they were less demographically assaulted by migration than let's say Southwest United States, But in years leading up to 2016, because of the Obama administration racial politics of resentment, she flooded upper Midwest and places like Maine, which is to say the rate of change there was so fast and it was being felt much worse,

or it just felt worse because the change was bigger than what had been before. So these two things, trade policy and migration restriction became the biggest part of the Trump campaign. I'd say actually migration restriction most of all. And I remind you that Trump voters on the whole are more affluent than the average American. The narrative from both mainstream media and these populist wings that I'm criticizing now, that Trump voters are completely poor, toothless people who are completely disenfranchised and that they can act as the demagogic champions isn't quite the case. It's the Trump campaign again appealed to a more affluent voter on average than the average American. I think that's very clear from all statistics I've seen, that's true. But Trump ran on these two things,

migration restriction, trade, and this helped him win that area as also putting a stop to stupid wars that were causing deaths of young men, again, primarily from such communities because working class, lower middle class, and middle class white communities provide 80%, I think, still of the combat troops of America, similar in Western Massachusetts and such, similar demographics. And just pointless deaths, and not just deaths, but what gets hidden in the talk of wars that somewhat angers me is that tens of thousands have been maimed, and this is very rarely brought up. Battlefield medicine has gotten much better, so you get less deaths now in Iraq and Afghanistan than you did, for example, Vietnam, but I think actually the death toll would be larger

in these two cases than it was for America and Vietnam. If, let's say, battlefield medicine had not progressed since, whatever, 1960s and 70s, but just because it's progressed doesn't mean these men are not named, they are missing a hand or a foot or so on. So out of these concerns, Trump formed powerful platform, rejected stupid, just stupid GOP mistakes like calling for cutting back social security or calling for raising the retirement age to be eligible for social security. Or he also maybe even proposed some basic health coverage. There was one episode in a debate where he made Rubio and Cruz both looked like callous fools when they acted hysterical. He say, we don't want people just dying in the streets and such, and they acted hysterical.

Well, that's all common sense that has nothing to do with populism, socialism, and so on. He's just a capable demagogue who uses common sense in the moment to see. So every one of us, by the way, supported all of that in 2016 and continue to. Even those who are accused of being dark libertarian Nazi billionaire plotters like Peter Thiel, as far as I know, He has been regularly talking about putting up restrictions regarding China, economic restrictions, tariffs, and has long been, I think, talking about the trade and the industrial espionage war that China carries out against America, and the unethical collusion of American companies with Chinese, so hardly any real voice on let's say the post GOP right would support the orthodoxies of the pre-Trump GOP

of Paul Ryan and Romney and Jack Kemp or Jeb Bush, or even Reagan today, many such, because their failure over many years, but also because it became obvious none of these so-called conservative honchos was ever genuine about their free market language. And the economic program of Romney and Ryan in 2012 differs from Obama's by maybe something like 3%. See, if they were genuine libertarians or free marketeers or such, consider just the issue of trade protectionism, industrial protectionism, for example. It's important for America, for all kinds of reasons, to have an industrial base. Actually, engineering innovation takes place because you have a manufacturing industry often. That's why Japan is so advanced in robotics. On the other hand, maybe America shouldn't be,

to perpetuity, just manufacturing washing machines, air conditioner, or fridges. Maybe those things should be left for Mexico, Philippines to do. And America should instead be building spaceships, flying cars, robots, and many such things. Or why don't such things exist in, well, in United States or anywhere else? And I think it is because of government regulations, but it's regulations that people like Jeb Bush and Romney have no intention or even conception of how to begin to lift. And so, really, the libertarianism is something completely fake that isn't principled. It's simply to reward a few of their donors. I've talked before, actually, many such instances of the GOP, politicians support subsidies for preferred industries. Not for big C capital, an abstraction,

but for their particular donors. And one of the most egregious, that was my special interest, is how many supposed conservative activists have supported Monsanto. Now it's a different company, I forget who it's bought by. But many, including conservative judges, uphold insane rules such as that if Monsanto's seeds are blown by wind on an unwilling farmer's land, he is forced to pay them. Or in similar ways, how organic producers were almost banned from advertising that they sold milk not produced with RBST growth hormone, which is banned in Europe. And so a farmer produces without that wants to advertise and now he has to write on the bottle that actually it hasn't been proven that RBSD is bad. But they wanted to ban outright the ability of an organic producer to advertise his wares.

Free speech for their donors, but not for others. And many other similar matters relating to environment and production of food, which is why the Kochs, the Koch industry and the Koch sphere have sent people after me and my friends for years. That may be a talk or an article for another time. I can document that quite precisely. And I think it's because I have the words anti-xenoestrogen activist in my bio on Twitter, and they know that if there is a cultural social trend against xenoestrogens, the Koch industry stand to lose billions. Not just them, but them and their friends And so on, not forgetting, of course, the bailouts in 2008, which make a mockery of any pretense to a free market. And all the GOP was complicit in that.

So in that context, it's perverse to talk about belt-tightening for social security or similar things, although it should be said it's obvious the country will run out of money. There will be a reckoning like that hasn't been seen. But still, it's a stupid thing to go around pretending that you can solve the problem and talking about cutting social security. And it may indeed be that the ends of what I've called GNC, or International Racial Marxism, that once that financial line is cut in a major crisis, that's what usually ends things. But who knows, that's for another. My point is, there had long been a rejection for many good reasons of the GOP's uselessness on economic matters, and its hypocrisy regarding free market language.

But I need to emphasize that Trump ran on tariffs and immigration restriction, and that's how he won these areas that the traditional GOP, and Romney in particular, had such trouble winning in elections. And yet tariffs are not socialism, you see. Excuse me, they're not even necessarily populism. So when Trump proposes tariffs, and Mr. Jonah Goldberg of Goucher College National Review, what he calls tariff socialism, Paul Ryan may believe that, but there is nothing that forces you to accept that absurd judgment. And yet it seems that many on the dissident right were very eager to accept just that, to pretend that Trump, with his common sense, again, I don't even call them populist, his common sense reforms in an American context, that there was some kind of socialism, that

there were socialist intellectual revolutionaries. And that Trump's phrase, when he says, for example, this is very telling, he called the GOP a worker's party, and then they add, oh, no, no, it's a working class party, which is of course something very different than a worker's party. And instead of common sense reforms that would help America's actually very highly paid workers, chiefly again tariffs, immigration restrictions, and no, they want to say this signals some populist socialist moment with a capital M, and such hoary fools as Randy's magazines Now started to think at this time of themselves as the vanguard of millions of downtrodden urban workers that in fact do not exist. They have no idea what the American working class actually looks like, how big it is,

what the order of battle is. And the role playing, they start to role play like they lived in 1920s. And many other stupidities and exaggerations like these, typical of intellectuals vanity. Oh, Trump signals a move away from Jeb Bush, Romney, orthodoxy on trade matters, and he appealed with some vaguely populist language to the upper Midwest. Well, let me get into this heavy stuff I got from Marx and Dugan, you know. And they're in this also ignorant of the other side, that Trump, although it was necessary for him and for any Republican to win the upper Midwest, But he still has to appeal to small business, small business owners. He has to appeal to evangelicals who vote 85-90% for Trump.

And really small business owners are the backbone of any right wing or resistance to the left in the United States now. They were also in France under Pujard, and they also formed base of, for example, Bolsonaro in Brazil. And it was the 2010 Tea Party that turned into the MAGA movement, and these were mostly small biz owners, many of them women, who for them overtalk of socialism is poison. Although they would have gladly agreed and did agree to Trump's reasonable policy list, which he never hinted led to socialism, and in fact has nothing to do with it. But in any case, the populists I'm talking about are also very wrong about the working class as such, you may all remember, some of my audience may remember Stud, the poster, a very beloved

poster. He was working class. I don't want to give away precise details of what he did for concern of his privacy, but he and other genuinely working class guys have been part of Frog Twitter, I mean the inner core group, since the beginning of, let's say, 2015. And I can tell you that Stud's concerns were not at all what the conservative DC fags who post as his defenders. Imagine, he made more money than the compact magazine editors. When working class people have jobs in America, they generally do quite well. Their concern are not really this economic deprivation thing, it's more that jobs disappear entirely, and they're not hungering actually for government handouts or child tax credits. Again, it's achievable

purely through tariffs, the disappearance of these jobs. When they exist, they do quite And the fact that they're also motivated perhaps by things such as women in their communities are obese, or they're wrecked spiritually. These things are much bigger concerns. They are also concerned by racial agitation against them in schools, and racial agitation by leftist politicians. This big concern also, maybe, the general shittiness of modern life, its constricting character. This what probably leads to fentanyl and other drug abuse problems, I'd say more than economic deprivation. And that constricting nature of life comes as much from conservative family values types as it does from the left. Both seek to restrict the horizon of possible exciting action. And I don't mean this, by the way,

necessarily in any high-flown way. You have conservative judges in family courts who absolutely crush working class men and slave them through the vehicle of marriage to the state. F. Roger Devlin writes about this. And so my concerns are rather different in the end. My article on Millet was welcomed especially by Argentine frogs. These are young Argentine men. They are 100%, let's say this word, frogs. Anime Nazis, if you want to go that. People who like Hugo Boss and Catgirl in Nazi outfits, okay? They're not American GOP, let me put entirely different priorities, entirely different world. But they are not at all upset by Millet's libertarian-ish language. They don't consider this a trick of the globalists. They like my article, and they like him and his message of freedom.

And this is the key of what I want to say on this segment. There's a kind of retarded telephone game on the online right. Somehow, it classifies someone like Millet automatically as globalist enemy because he uses the language of economic liberty. On the other hand, his opponents, the Argentine establishment for decades, would by this reasoning be friends and allies of the economic populists in the United States. Yes, this my point, Perón's victory in Argentina turns that country into a kind of leftist nationalist, you can say economic populist dream case scenario. It's Bannonism or Pat Buchanan on steroids. All the rhetoric, all the programs and policies, they got everything. The inveighing against Anglo-neoliberalism, attacking the IMF, globalism,

against the mechanism of capital, destroying families, destroying communities and the individual. And the results after decades is a country, again, that competes with Venezuela. When I say it should be competing with America, it has, the resources and the human capital to do this, but is totally wrecked by economic populism, okay? Because it doesn't matter how you dress it up, it ends up turning into leftism, always it seems. Maybe it doesn't have to, but for whatever reason, it always seems to lead to the same thing, the worst thing of which is open borders, whether it's in Argentina or in Basque Country or Catalonia or Ireland where you have Gerry Adams of the IRA and such who stands with migrants, okay, and whatever such people take power, they flood the country with low-quality

stupid migrants because they can buy their votes. And fundamentally, this, what economic populism is, it doesn't matter if in the beginning they attack migration as a supposed tool of the oligarchs to lower wages, that's not actually what migration is. It's a tool of leftist politician in search for clients. In the end, they realized what Perón did, that you can import, and in that case imported from the Argentine provinces, the hinterlands, a mass of Morochos, brown peoples that the population of Buenos Aires came to call la negrada, the blackness. And they imported them, and gerrymandered the district of Recoleta, the rich district in Buenos Aires, where the Argentine old guard lived. They were wealthy landowners and such, but others, too. You know, and quite anglophile, actually.

And they had many economic relations with England, so it extends even to that. The Anglo, the legacy of Anglo-neoliberal capital, you know, and he gerrymandered them to destroy their political voting base, and so on. United, the Recoleta district, with something called Boca, which is a very poor district, still that if you go there now, the police won't even protect you. They tell you, don't go there, we can't, you know, you're on your own if you do. So you see, this is what populists discover soon. They discover that if you base your political vision on this idea of the downtrodden, that you can always import more. Your initial promise is notwithstanding. It makes sense to import more of the salt of the earth, poor so-called working class people, many of who don't work at all, of course,

but you can give them a washing machine on voting day and you stay in office, why wouldn't you? And really, if you have a religious motivation to it on top of this, then it makes even more sense. No, after all, you are fighting demonic evil rich with top hats and degenerate decadent people who have sex parties, like in Eyes Wide Shut, and they're godless, and look, here are your co-religionists from foreign lands, yes, with a humble look in the eye. Yes, they're foreigners, but they're your brothers in religion, they're moral people, They work in class, right? Why would you not import them as allies? They're good family people. You can really stick it to those top hat people. And they work. They're not avocado toast eating hipster kids who just want to work in film and such,

these sluts, oh, I know this rhetoric. I've seen it in Buenos Aires, living there long time. If you're a smart, ambitious white kid in Buenos Aires who has opportunities in life restricted greatly by people who talk this way and who take, let's say, 70, 80% of your family's income to support this parasitic voting base of salt-of-the-earth working-class people, or to subsidize the salaries of bus drivers and union workers and government workers. And it's all done, you know, it's all done with just this economic populist rhetoric. By the way, the same thing happens in United States, except it's to certain industries and NGOs and other groups favored by government, I'll get to that in a moment, but in Argentina, yes, they call you selfish, or a neo-liberal globalist,

or whatever, such if you say, no, I don't want this, I don't want to be a pay pig. So this is what I said in the article, that functionally, libertarianism in a place like Argentina is white supremacy. And so it's a case where the left is more correct than the phrase that gets thrown around, the woke is more correct than the mainstream. But here, the left is more correct than the dissident right, because the dissident right has put these weird blinders on. It let bizarre men with Chomsky-eyed delusions distort what Trump's victory meant and what the problems actually are, to the extent where, when I applauded the coup against Evo Morales, which was carried out by the productive Croatian, Spanish-Croatian white minority in Bolivia,

the middle class, got rid of this Evo-moralist who was the, let's say, the ethnic chief of the Indio, of the indigenous population of Bolivia, and he became president of the country entirely again on this kind of rhetoric. We are standing against the globalist, theo-colonialist, IMF, and we stand proudly for the good of the people and the good of the nation and who got hurt. It was the European population of Bolivia, which he not so much called in a Rwanda fashion, he wouldn't have been able to do that, but went through all kinds of symbolic gestures to turn his back on Europe, on Spain, on Bolivia's Spanish identity and so forth. So of course, I applauded the coup against him. And when I did so, however, the entire, certainly all the online Marxists and the dissident left, so-called,

but also parts of the dissident right whose minds have been rotted by this kind of Chomskyite rhetoric. Oh, look, he is standing against this proud nationalist man. We support nationalism in all countries. He's standing against this nationalist populist. This is globalism, you know, and this kind of thing. And in Argentina, I don't know if Milay can do it, but in Argentina, lowering taxes greatly, if you can greatly lower taxes and getting rid of sclerotic economic regulations and restrictions on life and such, that would in fact be the end of the slavery of the capable white middle and upper middle class who are now in service of a parasitic state that, am I allowed on this show to tell the truth? It serves not the poor even of their own people,

but the poor of a quite different origin than theirs. And by the way, even if this state did take from them to serve the poor of their own people, it would still be unjustified the way it is done there. That kind of welfare estate is a luxury available maybe to a place like Japan or Uruguay in the past, Uruguay in the past I mean, places I mean, or Scandinavia in the past, places with a large degree of social trust, and which wouldn't socially, morally, it wouldn't be tolerated to use a welfare net as a way to make a living, or for a politician to gain a reliable voting block that way through transfer payments. But it wouldn't be acceptable for a family to make a living off that, not to even speak of doing so generationally, across generations and so.

So this is another thing the most extreme dissident right people misunderstand when they extort Asia, or China specifically. Maybe they don't know that these places don't have a big government safety net. You know, you have to rely on your family for that. At least their safety net, so-called, is not as big as in Social Democrat America or West Europe, anyway. America must have the most gigantic welfare state of any nation ever in history, probably more than communist nations. It's not abused in Asia as it is in the West. You don't have a politics and an economy run on transfer payments to an underclass in Asia in exchange for political loyalty, not in general anyway. You have client groups, that's true of all modern states because that's how modern democracy works.

It tends to destroy nations in the long run. But Asia has not reached the level of America or West Europe in this sense. But to return to Argentina, yes, libertarianism there would be white supremacy or at least white freedom, which leads to white supremacy as an organic emergent phenomenon. And I would add that if the blinders were not on, some at least of the decision try to be able to see that similar holds for the United States. The white working class, the lower middle class, but to be fair, whites of all other classes as well, are not hurt by hyper capitalism or deregulation, but by the opposite. And one of the clearest evidences is this graph, the per capita contributions to government spending, and the net is $220,000 for white, but a negative of over $500,000 for Hispanic

and over $700,000 for blacks, for individual. That's over a lifetime, I mean. So that means when you take the public treasury, white, average white pays in over his lifetime $220,000 to public treasury, whereas the others I mentioned take out much more than that. And there is nothing better than what I just said now to show you the absurdity of you look at that and that's the cycle, okay? That's the Sputnik cycle, that's GNC, that's international racial Marxism. To be turned truly international, you know, with global wealth transfer soon, under the name of climate change hysteria, so that then perhaps the entire global south can become obese on corn chip. And then perhaps more money can be sent for medical care to take care of obesity from corn chip.

But even now, you have one part of the population working to pay the way in life of another. And you are told by the dissident right, populist brain trust, that the problem is hyper capitalism. The problem is we need modem government programs and somebody like Belay is an evil globalist to suggest otherwise, but maybe we need, oh, they add that we need modem government programs for whites too, or for the middle class too if you want to be more polite. And yet, what would those programs look like, by the way? Who would be running those programs? Instead of child tax credits, why don't you begin by saying, let's lower taxes on actual workers, on working class people, or on lower middle class people and so on?

You know, that plus tariffs, plus migration restriction, what happened to all that? Why does any of this require a formal critique of the vague concept of neoliberalism? What does any of it have to do with punishing, so-called punishing corporations with bigger tax rates? You know, this is one of their things, the populists in the United States. They say corporations are the ones that promote wokeness and identity politics, which is called complete nonsense. It's not corporations. It's government that does it and bullies, really, corporations into doing it. Or if you are the CEO of one of these companies, you will very well get fired or even sued because you'll get sued by the United States government if you don't put in woke, anti-white policies in place.

But they say, no, no, it's the corporations. And they engage in woke, this kind of wokeness, and we're going to punish them with bigger tax rates. But it was Trump who lowered them in the United States. Before Trump, America had some of the highest corporate tax rates in the world, and this did nothing to, that punishment, such as it was, did absolutely nothing to stop out of control woke capital. How come Putin can have national sovereignty and no woke capital, and he has some of the lowest corporate tax rates in the world? What does any of this also have to do with pornography, or hypersexualization, or having a politician pester you about going to church. I don't know of any working class men, and I know quite a few through online meetings and such,

I don't know of any who are hungering for a politician to lecture them, a gay face like Holly or Santorum, to tell them that they must go to church and that they need help with family formation. It's completely absurd. You know, will people feel better about their enslavement If they're not secular, what am I missing in this? So yes, you don't want to sound like Paul Ryan and Romney. I understand that. But these other proposals you are making are stupid. They have nothing to do again with what does a smart, ambitious, young white kid, for example, encounter in high school, which is racial abuse, communitarian language, racial mobilization language, you must give to the poor, and the poor are the POC and so forth. By the way, just as an aside, even the whole thing you see online

with sexual politics and marriage politics and so on, the left and the liberals have in large part reconciled themselves to the institution of marriage because they control it now. And so whereas a wealth of possibilities is promoted for women and it's completely acceptable for a woman to say, I'm not interested in marriage, It's not my priority. I want to focus on my goals and this and that. If you are, let's say, a 23-year-old man and you go around saying these same things, I'm not interested. I don't think marriage is in my interest. In the abstract, you will get very bad stares from leftists and liberals. It's not considered something good in liberal society to say things like that. Now, I don't know how online right people can go fooling themselves about this.

But no, liberals are actually in love with marriage, especially after they've inserted the gay thing into it. But generally, in high school, and then college or job, and so on, there is endless guilt-tripping to try to get such a kid to sacrifice his time and money for third world armies of the poor. and he's confronted with girls bifurcated between the obese, which are increasing percentage, and then there are a few thoughts, and the rest are on drugs or mind-bend into trannidom. Well, quite a few, the percentage of that is very small, but the causes of this is also misunderstood. I'm addressing this to dissident right and left, who misunderstand the causes of problems today, and even what these problems are. The tranny thing is actually quite tiny. A much bigger problem is what I said,

the obesity among women, especially in the United States. But none would dare touch, for example, this problem, obesity or the fact that women are given absurd privileges today to accuse and ruin lives on very little evidence and such. And in fact, many conservatives are complicit, I tell you again, in gynocracy. My friend Marmot has a recent commentary on this, a thread where points out, as F. Roger Devlin did before, that it is conservative judges who use state power to sodomize men through divorce proceedings. And so through the fake institution of marriage, now many men are effectively enslaved to the state because you have to keep making payments, either child support or alimony payments to a woman, even when it's completely undeserved, or you go to jail, again, under the pretext

of providing for a woman who has left them and may or may not take care of the children and so on. A man is enslaved to the state. The family courts and the state gets a big cut of those payments to the woman. F. Roger Devlin, again, I strongly recommend his essays on this, he describes process in detail. But these matters are of far more importance to the lives of, let's say, working class men or even not working class men, but they are never touched by dissident right anymore in the same way that the racial question is never touched. Above all, I mean to say it is the constricting, a moralistic hectoring style of the modern education and of life now in general, on top of which was grafted lately the nightmare of the pandemic and the possible future nightmare of climate change emergency.

And it makes the populist economic whatever you want to call it, a dissident wholesome chungus agenda, somewhat of a moot point. Because fundamentally, yes it is, the needful yes is first taking the boot off the neck of your most energetic and smart demographic, not hectoring them into further service and further restraints with no reward in sight. So I know what leads to this. It's the fact that actually solving the problems of the modern state may be impossible, or next to impossible. When you have a large percentage of the population that is almost useless and it lives off the work of a very few, and then a political machine that feeds on that by providing to them, by adopting them as clients, it's almost impossible to get out of that without convulsions.

And when to this reality you add an ethnic or racial one with racial consciousness or mobilization emerging as primary motivator of this thievery and exploitation, it is almost guaranteed you'll have large-scale convulsions if you try to reform it. And hence, then there are the constant attempts by reformers to square the circles, to find some other solution to this problem that will never fit. What I think they try to do is desperately obscure it, to pretend that the ruling machine is different from what it actually is, that in fact there is this hidden capitalist elite, but that they represent the true interest of the people, in other words, that politics in this sense becomes a contest over who is the real leftist.

And in Argentina, but not only there, I think you have a case study of what happens when you get left populists instead of nominal liberals taking control of the machinery of state. And it's actually more of the same. I mean, Bernie would probably make it even worse. And yet I will not end show on this note. I will have guests on next, my friend Lady of the Lake, Lady Astor, direct from Buenos Aires, with a message of hope, because in this suffocating atmosphere in Argentina, even the dullest of youths who have a glimmer of fire left in them will revolt eventually and may be revolting now, and they would go for any man who promises to smash it, at least for the entertainment, if only to end, for a little while, the draining of life by the masses of the piss-dry

and the hysterical, and to bring back some room to breathe freely. I will first go to break. I have midget guests here to prepare my recording equipment for when Lady Esther come on. Yes, please. Yes, hello, dwarf, you come. Come, bring me Turkish coffee and fine porcelain cup. I stole this cup, by the way, from Gulbenkian Museum in Lisbon before I left Europe. I love Brutalist architecture now, by the way, but I will discuss this next time. Lisbon has beautiful, brutalist building by the river, but it's the water. Dwarfs, you are drowning me in music. Bring me the coffee already. Very honored to have back on show Lady Astor, my favorite oracle and a visionary of both Christian Mysticism and Stregheria, which, ladies, this is ancient art of witchcraft from Tuscany.

You're a Tuscan witch, am I right? But... Benetto. Hello, my friend. Hello, my friend, lady. Welcome back to show, and momentous events happening now in Argentina. There is the rise of Millet, which we discuss, and now soon election in October, is this correct? Yes, only a few days now. It's going to be on Sunday 22nd and things are heating up. Right now, the dollar rate exploded, grasping 1,000 pesos, and we're heading right for the hyperinflation, which is always what happens when social Democrats get their hands on the wheel. in this country. It's like a mimicry of 1989, but things are much worse than then because we were a different country. Maybe you could say a proper country, but it got increasingly worse.

But as I always tell you, Argentum, because this is the last Roman province at the end of the earth and you know things go somehow faster the cycles are always faster so here you can see prediction of things that maybe are haven't happened in the rest of the world yet but it has a level of coalescence I don't know what the energy well you know there's very important lay lines in the pampas especially in, yes, in what is the Tandilia and Bentania, you know, these Sierras, this conflict that brings all the energy from the ocean, from Atlantis, from the Atlantic Ocean. Yes, this is very strange, lady, because what you say about the peso being 1,000, I have not been keeping up, that's insane. I remember when I was there it was about three, when I was there for the first time, I mean

in the 2000s, the late 2000s, it was at times about three pesos to one dollar. Of course, it rose over time, but now a thousand pesos, you already have hyperinflation. It was something, I think I was there last year or so, it was about 100, maybe 200 pesos, and now it's a thousand, and that's insane. And if I may say, the lady is not exaggerating about the feel of this country. One of the most amazing things, one of the most amazing things, lady, is, and I thought it was the Antarctic penumbra, that there was some protection from Antarctica, because I love your country. I love the city of Buenos Aires. When I first came there, there was such a feeling of freedom and just to sound like a hippie, but yes, good vibes from the earth. I've always felt good there.

You have that, the chthonic energy is very strong, and I do believe that the proximity to Antarctica has something to do with it, because if you look at the map focused from Antarctica, you would see that is the Austral empire. You know, completely different perspective. And there are certain, yes, yes. I think there's even flora trees and such that you share with New Zealand and so on. It's an amazing country and it pains me so much to see what's happening to it. But give the audience some of the political lay of the land. So you say that the elections will be October 20th or sometime around then. What is happening? The people are obviously desperate and unsatisfied because of the economic situation, but there are other problems too. What is happening?

What are the different candidates, the political situation in general, just so the audience can get a feel for it? Okay. So, and we had a first vote in August, and this is where Milay became the front runner, and the other candidates are, well, the ruling party candidate is Sergio Masa. He could be considered, well, he's now within the Kirchnerist government, but Cristina and Alberto Fernandez are nowhere to be found. They have completely vanished. And now for the past three, four months, Sergio Massa has been the spokesman and the de facto president and he is running for president but kind of like not acknowledging that he's been a part of the debacle. Basically he wants to shed the skin of Kirchnerismo because it's a complete failure and wants

to appeal to traditional Peronists and say that he has the know-how in order to make things work. what people reply is obvious. Like if you know how to make it work, why aren't you making it work? And basically this guy just confirmed that they are printing our currency in China. How embarrassing can that be? There's no limit to the submission. Like Sergio Masa going everywhere around the world, trying to sell us bit by bit in order to grasp what little power he still has. but, you know, at the face of the flawed policies. And honestly, he's not popular among the Kirchneristas either, because these are progressive and Sergio Massa is seen as kind of like centrist, kind of like center right, but certainly not a progressive, even if he participates in that space.

Then we had in the last Sunday, we had the first presidential debate and only five, the five who got over 1% of the votes were there, you know, speaking. And there was, it was hilarious because the hard left, Frante de Iquierda, they have this lady, this chosen lady, blonde Miriam Bregman, and she is a very smart bregman but she was she didn't get enough votes to win but of course she is placed there because she's witty enough to bring the you know the leftist talking points and to basically make Millet you know set on fire you know it's like just to mess with him a little bit then this guy's Chiaretti is like this Italian from Cordoba basically during the debate he painted his province like well Singapore is an underdeveloped country next to

Cordoba but I have to admit that Cordoba is in fact the province that has the greatest influx of internal immigration. Basically, lots of people from all over the country moved to Cordoba. At one point, Mille does this play in the debate and basically goes and confronts Chiaretti and says, if I win, if I go to the Balotage, will you support me? And basically he got that. But of course, you know, the other people, the other speakers were Massa and Patricia Bullrich, aka Patricia Boomrich, because we all know that she was part of Montoneros, you know, the Marxist guerrillas trained by the Cubans in the 60s who wanted to force people into their beloved revolution, but the people did not want that at all. You know, I can tell you that, for example, my mother was a disco dancing queen.

You know, and with my dad, their greatest interest was entering the hottest club there was, which was called Mau Mau. Yes. Oh, yes. Yes. From the Mau Mau rebellion. It was a joke on that. The fun fact, the doorman, the bouncer at Mao Mao was an African gentleman, of course. Yes. No, this is very funny and what you're saying about Patricia Bullrich, just for the audience to understand, Bullrich is a famous, one of the big oligarchic families of Argentina. So this is a girl from, let's say, equivalent of Mayflower family in the United States, promoting Maoist revolution during the 60s. It's this kind of cliché, right? Yes. Yes, that this is correct. And of course, she's like, yes, of course, I changed, you know. But at the end of the day, she has this authoritarian vein during the pandemic.

She was constantly on TV saying, like, why cannot we look at the registry and go home per home to seek out and forcefully vaccinate the people who refused? So, of course, you know, she has that mindset. She has the mindset of imposing her will upon the people. You know, she said that she represents. She is with Juntos por el cambio, which is a former cambiemos, which is the former pro. And this is this is when things get complicated because Macri, former President Macri was the only one who was able to defy Kirchnerismo and win in 2015, but then had a moment such like Trump. But the problem is that Macri made very grave mistakes with some of his aides, with the people that he had surrounding him. They gave him bad advice. He was not good in the economy.

That was supposed to be his strong suit. So then came Alberto Fernández, which was the worst government I've ever endured in my life, and that's a lot, that's honestly a lot. And Bullrich is from Macri's party, is that what you're saying? I don't know the, yes. So it's kind of a center-right pretense, but she's actually this ex-so-called leftist authoritarian. Yes, but at the same time, a few months ago, she was in London. I don't know for what reason, getting some orders, perhaps, from her, you know, superiors. And then the other day she starts explaining about some great ideas that she got from an NGO in San Francisco, really San Francisco, NGOs from San Francisco, who else, she's a Well, yeah, so she's part of this all, but so in Argentina, how it's a multi-party election

then and how will it work? Who wins? You have to get over 50% of the vote, then there will be a runoff or if nobody does, what happens? If you get 41% of the votes and you have a 10% difference with the first runner up, you win. if not you go to the valotage similar to french system so the two who had the most boats go to valotage so what what's it looking right now it's christina kirschner said it first it's going to be a game of thirds because yeah she is of course smart but sadly she played with the wrong chips And perhaps if she had the proper ear whisperers, she could even be on our side, but sadly, she did not. So, she wins. You're talking about Christina Kirchner now? Yes, Christina Kirchner, yeah. At one point, because I know that she saw at one point

that the game was losing the complete sovereignty of the country, and I believe that she tried in her way clumsily to prevent it, but it was too far gone, and she has the fifth colon within. Because basically the Kirchneristas were the ones who set up the whole myriad of NGO conglomerates here in the country. We have basically the same actions that we see in Europe and in the United States. Like for abortion, we had the same Planned Parenthood, all the same people, all the same money, the same interest, the same disguises, like, you know, it's like not a lot of people, like many don't realize that most people who have Netflix or who can have this sort of vanity or luxury purchases are not the mass of Argentinians, right? So if you put the

handmaid's tail? Who are you talking to? Like how many women in Argentina have read Margaret Agwood? Yes. No, it's this whole NGO scam, the civil society scam is how a lot of countries are wrecked today. Yes, infiltrated. You know, Orban and yes, Orban and Putin to their credit have noticed this, but maybe Maybe too late, you see, because, well, that's another discussion. I don't have many high hopes for future of Hungary or Russia because the young people in those countries, lady, have ... Well, that's another discussion. But to go back to Argentina, I want to know what is mood on the street. I remember being there- The mood is triumphant. Yes. I remember being there before Macri and I predicted, I told friends, a year before Macri

is going to win, because even taxi drivers were talking about having public tribunals for the Kirchner speakers, and it's so much worse now. I knew Macri would win, just people were so upset they were going to go for him. That didn't turn out well, as you say. What is mood? I'm not there now. You are. Tell the audience. You say it's triumphant. What are people's... Yes. Look, this is a revolution of the young. Like you said, in Europe and in many other places in the Anglosphere the youth feels exhausted some of them have bought into what the Leviathan has sold them this bill of goods that is of nothing it's just like sit there and die we'll just give you like what Harari says we'll give you weed we'll give you drugs

we'll give you video games just forget forget your life but just the youth here doesn't want to forget that they are alive and they are very angry because the pandemic was very long and very restricted. And they recognized it as a coup by old people, you know, to steal their lives. So this created a situation in which this, imagine like I wrote this in an article and my sub stack, chill, chill. Yes, just so the audience know, ladyaster.substack.com ladyaster write amazing sub stack pieces you must all subscribe yes go on so i i wrote this imagine you were a kid 14 16 you were forced to sit in front of a computer you couldn't go out this sickness did not affect you whatsoever and suddenly you're forced to sit

in front of a computer and you have to listen to this feminist crone, you know, tell you that you are born evil, you know, you are just bad, they have to make laws to prevent a society from you because you are worse than Frankenstein and all this on a constant basis and then you see on the TV they are everywhere, they pass laws in their benefits, they have the scarves, they riot, they do things. So, you know, this is unbearable, you know, it's impossible to stop. And, you know, this brought this kind of ground swell. And I think this is a movement. And I will say this, there was this little boy that I discussed several times on my ex-Twitter feed, that is a little child, his name was Lucio Dupuy, and he was murdered and tortured in cold blood by his mother and her lesbian lover.

They both were feminists, rabid radical feminists, and they would take the boy to their marches. The boy, they had, like, they were denounced by neighbors and family. The boy would show up with cigarette burns, with a broken arm, and everybody shut their mouth. And even, like, when the grandfather and the father of the child, they tried to go and take it to court, the feminist judge, of course, decided, no, of course, he has to stay with the mother. and of course we know now how this story ended and I know that this had a very profound impact in the fabric of society and it started to turn the tide against all these histrionics, the deranged menas, you know, breaking the bones of men and children deep in the woods,

this cannot stand so I think it is awful it is awful it just was too much and that yes that's an awful story the fever pitch but you're saying that yeah sorry I don't mean to interrupt but you you think the rise of you think you told me this before lady but the rise of me lay has a lot to do with an extreme femininity that's developed in Argentina almost uniquely that that even Even in feminist West Europe and United States, people don't understand what's going on there, yeah? No, because the thing is that there is the demographic disparity. Women in Argentina are 53% of the population. We have had, of course, women president three times, Isabel Péron and Christina Kirchner twice, and many of our politicians are women.

But what they have is that this revanchist attitude, you know, that they want to kind of take revenge for some, like, imagined, you know, slight and, you know, they have been really aggressive, you know, and they are insistent on what they call the deconstruction of men, of masculinity. They want the subservient men, and this is the results. They were in charge of educating these boys for the extent of their lives, and now that they can vote, they want them out of the picture. Yes, and you are saying the laws are so restrictive against Argentinian men that many have just left the country because one denouncement from a woman can destroy your life even more than the other. Yes, they just have to say that you did something, that you were violent, that you raped, and

your life is completely destroyed. You know, there's this soap opera actor called Juan D'Artez. He was accused by the collective of feminist actresses, and he now has to live in Brazil. And they were chasing him all over the world because apparently they would say that he abused this girl who was a minor at the time, who was in a soap opera with him in Nicaragua, and she didn't say anything for, I don't know, 20 years. Suddenly all this happened, but there was no proof. So they wanted to try him in Nicaragua, in Brazil, in Argentina, basically wherever he would go like yes militant feminists and like okay yeah well if he was guilty but you cannot do a pre-trial minority report on people the basis the entire edifice of our civilization is based

on blind justice and that you are innocent under until proven guilty so this feminist justice is if a woman is like reverse Sharia, you understand? Of course. Just so people understand, other countries have MeToo, and similarly you can get false accused, and it's a nightmare, but there's still some due process in other countries. In Argentina, it's just become what the lady is saying. I remember last time I was there, I went to this... I mean, you see it day to day. There are signs everywhere. Did somebody look at you wrong on the street? Did someone say something to you, denounce that? I was at a gym, I'd never seen this really in another country and some hysterical cunt lady, some hysterical cunt, I don't know, she's seen in her thirties, who knows,

but she started screaming at this poor guy, I'd never seen this kind of hysteria, but it's pretty much what you're describing, reverse Sharia, you know? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, it's like her voice and her sayings have more power, So, well, this is actually, going back to the case, this is why Lucio died. Lucio died because the justice believed the mother despite that they had been denounced of violence and they had proof and the child was taken to hospital. No? Yeah, no, it is. But you're saying, so this disgust, which I assume even reasonable, pleasure-loving women are disgusted by this hysteria, has turned against the tide against, say, the centrists and the social-democrat-Kirchnerist parties, and they are...

When Javier Millet says that this belief that wherever there's a need, there's a right, and you have to pay for it, it's the beginning of, like, it's the beginning of Orlan Wu's, Because there is no justice if it's only for a certain people that can be decided. Because it was supposed, that is a king, you know, they say that they are against royalty, but only a king has the right to decree who deserves justice or not. Yes. Oh, no, there's certainly a law now of less majesté against, you know, you can't commit less majesté against holy women in Argentina, but the mood on the street, you're saying, is Millet in fact the front-runner in polls, and like are people on the street, are taxi drivers excited, is this, you know? Absolutely, yes, absolutely.

And because it feels like a liberation, what we see is Millet, we know he's not perfect, He's not the perfect paladin. He's not a person that has all these perfect references and has never done anything wrong. No. But you see, even for example, in the Bible, the greatest heroes are very many times not the greatest people. It's like, there's like Noah himself, you know, he's found drunk lying there and like in shame, naked, and you know, it's like there's many stories like this. It's not the perfect man. It's the right man. And this is why this is something that, for example, when they criticize Trump and they say like, yes, but Trump is not a Christian, but Trump, he's a philanderer. but Trump grabs women by the pussy and he's horrible. Yes. But what did I just tell you about Noah?

You know, it's like- No, of course, yes. You know, God chooses whoever he wants as a vessel for his will, you know? Yes, I believe that Trump is a comedian chosen as a vessel of God's destruction of the unjust on the world, lady. But regarding Milay, I don't know if you think perhaps in the article I wrote, which I know you read and I highly appreciate that you spread it to some of the Argentine politicians and Argentine intellectuals, so on, and I know it spread among them. There's a Spanish translation now. I did not mean to be, I feel a bit bad because I was maybe too pessimistic at the end of it. I figured that if Argentina continues on this path, it might even stop existing as a country. I don't know if Millay can reform things if he wins for the same reasons Macri couldn't.

I remember talking to you, and what you and your friend said, that if Macri had tried to reform the economy, which is basically a welfare economy, if he had tried to reform it, there would have been basically a revolution, civil war. Do you have confidence that Millay can actually change these things if he's elected? And by the way, do you think he'll win the election? The difference between Makri and Milay is the following. Milay had mostly middle-class and slightly older supporters. Because he was- You mean Makri? Yes, Makri. Because he was perceived by the bases to be a posh guy, you know? Just a rich boy. But Mille is completely, it traverses every social class, you know?

Because even the lowest feel that there's a hope, there's something, I hate to use this word, but there is indeed something messianic about Mille. And people believe that he is crazy enough. This is like, his hair, you know, he has this crazy hair that they call him el peluca, the wig, the wig millet. Like this crazy wig man, this mad hatter, because he looks like the mad hatter if you look at him. This mad hatter is the only one who is crazy enough to lead us through the Hades like Orpheus and take us outside without looking back. Without looking back. This is it. This is what people must understand, the charisma of men like this and Trump is infectious and people feel this guy has the way with him and you can't replace that with a kind of hoary

discussion of marxoid economics or intellectual talk about nationalism and so on or anti-nationalism or anything else. It's the charisma of these men people perceive. They can break through They can break through these ossified structures that are killing nations, lady. Yes, it's absolutely like that. And Victoria Bicharuel, like his running mate, is this first off, of course, you know, she's a friend of mine, but beautiful lady, very strong. And you know, it's like, how good can it get that you have this kind of like boudica style lady you know and then she's her name is Victoria like you're running with victory by your side that's like the symbols are all there I don't know what else I can say and you told me that yes you've told me about Victoria yes sorry

don't go no no everything feels like a volcano that is about to erupt and this This is why I press on this, that do not look back when you leave Hades, you know, because the other forces, they want to push us down and they want us to continue always looking back to the past, to the seventies, to what happened, to the bomb, to the military, yeah, but we were not alive. And as of now, only 12% of the Argentinian population was alive during that period. Yes. And 33% of the population is below 30 years old. So you see, this is the thing that the numbers, you know, are in Le's favor. You know, it's like... Very interesting. Allea has the best. You think he'll win? Yes. Exactly. But you think he'll win? You think he'll win? Yes.

Of course, there is a lot like the red circle is putting all the meat in the grill There's going to be psyops and there's going to be fake news every single day until the 22nd And then on that day, there's going to be attempted fraud. There's going to be stolen ballots there's going to be the works but when you have a flood of of paper so big you know you cannot stop it and this is what they were saying about the previous election in august yes that they tried and they they caught people but the thing is the kids the kids were filming these old people stuffing ballots in their bags yes and putting it online and saying like stop stealing our future stop it yes you know no it's wonderful that there's a a youth revolution in the favor of this,

because these stuffy old stuffed shirt boomer faggot, sorry, I know we have to keep polite show, it's family show, but this faggotized matriarchy that's been running Argentina into non-existence can finally be broken by spirit of youth, it's very enthusiastic thing to see. I think that there's something even Promethean about it, because you see that these boys and young girls, because Mille is always surrounded by women, she looks like Gaddafi, basically. Yes, well, this is wonderful. Carolina Piparo, Marcela Pagano, all very pretty and strong women. But of course, when you say this to the left, they will tell you, oh no, they are not real women. Yes. No, this is very good. I think what we're saying is it's something beyond ideology. When a country gets to such straits,

people want a guy like this to break through it no matter what. And just for audience to restate what my article was about is that the ruling establishment of Argentina for some time, has had rhetoric such as the so-called dissident circles in United States are using and so-called pseudo-banonite, left economic populist, economic nationalist populist rhetoric. And it's a joke, of course, because as you say, they're selling country to Chinese, they're flooding it with migrants from all over South America. And part, I think we discussed this last time, lady, but there was even a thing. There's a base where the Chinese, the supposedly economic populist nationalist government has given Chinese total sovereignty over some of the territory. Oh yes, and they are even allowed

to completely ransack our oceans. You know, they fish, they bring their fisheries there and you should see there's footage by night of some violets that you can see. It's like specks everywhere of the lights of these ships, these Chinese ships, depredating every single fish that's in our waters. And this is insane. But yes, the rains exist in the south and they even wanted to build a port in Ushuaia. Well, I have no doubt that they would eventually be allowed to do all kinds of, look, we shouldn't end this segment on such negative matters. No, of course not. It's perhaps next time you come, I would like your opinions on this particular thing, on the fact that it doesn't matter how you dress it up, this type of leftism, whether...

No, it does not work, because it's like putting another yoke upon you, because at one point it will be construed so the ones who have more have to help those who have less. It's always the same. The only way to lift is just fair rules for everyone and let people do what they do best. When everything is working, it lifts everyone up and everything works, but you cannot keep promoting people out of nepotism because what happens is that everything within the infrastructure starts to work terribly, you know, because they can't keep the trains running on time, basically. Yes. No, this is good. It's long talk, though. I want your opinion on this and on how Peronism changed over time in Argentina, but that's a longer talk. Lady, before we go, I want

to end show on nice matter. You just had interesting thread about Ruby Rosa. Would you care to Just comment on this colorful character and your opinions. Well, first of all, I'm a fan of Porfirio Rovinoza and many other such old school playboys of their time. And he died in Paris. He was killed in a car crash in July 1965 in Paris. He was just around the Bois de Boulogne, if I'm not mistaken, and he had this crash in his Ferrari. So basically, he was like a Dominican diplomat, international sportsman, polar player, everything that you can imagine. He's like, basically, you have to imagine like he died within his two favorite spots, the Longchamp race course and the Bagatelle polycline. What a beautiful way to go. Everybody loved him.

He had the greatest women in the world. He, for example, the the owner of the famous Tour d'Argent in Paris, he was one of his closest friends, this man called Claude Terrell and he says that about Ruby because they called him Ruby because of his last name Ruby Rosa but like the stone like the precious stone the ruby like he was a gentleman a gentleman has a lot of success but he keeps his big mouth shut and never talks about what happened and that's because you know like in the 50s you know and rumored to have a prodigious member no i mean not 11 inches according to people who were in the know and it's confirmed by people like Taki, by people like Turban Kapote, you know, they know, and Shasha Gabor said that there was nobody who could even come close,

that she forever, she could never reach that height that she reached with Ruby. So, you know, you have to just think that in that time, you know, it was like this, The men, they went to their jobs, they went to a men's club, they played sports, and women were for the night. And that's where someone like him excelled. He was always the perfect gentleman because he had an incredible education. But he was a child of the middle class. It's just that he had this droit de bibre and he had this energy inside of him and he wanted to be who he wanted to be, you know? Yes. No, it's an amazing thread. I hope you turn it into something longer. I think you could even do biography on such colorful character, lady. And you say women are of the night or were, and I think they are.

and I think Buenos Aires is, I hope, for its revival, lady, because Buenos Aires is the most so-called city of the night that I've seen anywhere. Absolutely, never sleeps. Avenida a corriente en un calguerme. Yes, and just the feel of night in that city, it completely changes its character and becomes something magical. And I hope everything you're saying come true. I think it will. I think perhaps there will be great revival of your city in the next few years. I know you made nightlife return before in that city. No, no, I would love it if you come around December to celebrate Millet winning. But yes, what you say is true. I'm thinking about doing a series, starting with the life of Porfirio Rubirosa, but also thinking of writing about

Prince Rodrigo D'Alemberg, who lived here in Argentina. And he was very popular in the summers in Punta del Este. Of course, friends of La Creme de La Creme, and all the jet setters, all the OGs. And I think it's very interesting, because this is the lost world that we have to inspire. Because what I always say, like, the last time I was in your show, I spoke about, you know, the memes of production and just like taking over the cultural industries. And I feel that a lot of this has been achieved. Of course, we need much more. I want movies. I want more books. I want shows. I want entire TV channels. I want composers. Although, well, you know that we had, have you heard mythologies? I do not know this, no. Oh my God, but you have to. Well, you know, it's like Daft Punk, you know? Yes.

One of the guys from Daft Punk just wrote a symphony, you know, earlier this year, and I think that you should listen to it because it's really good, Yes, it's Thomas Van Galter from Daft Punk, and he was inspired to do this for a ballet in the Grand Theatre de Bourdeux, and it's amazing. No, I must listen. I must listen to this lady. Go on. Yes, it has something like Wagnerian about it that you will like, but at the same time you can listen the Daft Punk electronic things. You have the songs like Les Amazons, Les Rives de Alexandre, Zeus, Les Gorgons, Les Renaissance, And then you see this and it's just like, oof, it lifts you up. No, I must listen to this lady and you come back soon please for us to talk about the

cultural revival that you are alluding to here because I know we've talked recently and you've told me just for audience to know lady knows many in fashion world and such and you've told me about their displeasure in the recent years over again this moralistic hysteria and they want to just have fun again and get rid of all this and um just uh lady puts on the most i hope i'm not being indiscreet but the most glamorous and amazing parties she's someone who has the right instinct to know for uh where a cultural overturning could could take place but we better leave that for next time lady i've been um i've been keeping this for a while everybody everybody can feel it, you know, so this is why I always tell people never to

black pill because it's all inside, the fire is within, and you can ignite it with your will, whenever you want to. I believe in this, and I believe you will read the revival also of your city again, but for audience to know, I alluded to this you we talked this next time lady There was a previous time when Argentina was in the depression and lady almost single-handedly lady asked her almost single-handedly brought back Buenos Aires nightlife and revised it, but we talked this next time what you think I think this will be very good. I always love to talk to you. And if they'd let us, we'd go on forever. But I have to make dinner. Yes, and I'm coming up on hard commercial break. I don't want to keep you anymore today, lady. I hope you come back soon.

And again, I send power to Argentina and Mille. Very good. Fire and power to you, my dear friend. Talk to you. Yes, until next time. Bye.