There is a Kalash ritual called Budulak. These are people, the Kalash live in mountain area, Afghanistan, Pakistan border. They are mastized, genetic, but look white, many of them even blondish. Probably, some people say ancient Aryan holdover in that region. A hundred years ago, about maybe 120 years ago, the Nuristanis, who were the same type of people, converted in a jihad when the British were still technically ruling that region and a ruler, one of the rulers of Afghanistan did a jihad against the blonde Nuristanis on the Afghan side of that division and now the Nuristanis who were previously feared by the Muslims as fierce pagan headhunters, they prided themselves on how many Muslim skulls they carried but after conversion They are among the fiercest champions of jihad.

Many men join a war against the Russians first and then the Americans. And this often happens, sorry to be a basic white supremacist, but just as the white Chechens invariably end up in leadership positions among the Islamists in the Middle East, in the same way the Nuristanis are often the leaders, Islamic insurgency in the Hindu Kush. But the Kalash, the ones on Pakistani, I think somewhere Chitral region, have remained pagan. Actually, many Pashtun have similar phenotype, blondish, often redhead, but the Kalash are almost uniformly so. And they are still pagan, but not warlike anymore. They would be wiped out under conditions of modern state, but they're protected supposedly by a Pakistani government.

Well, look, they have a ritual called Budulak, I think it means Shepherd King, and they send an adolescent boy into the mountains where he spent three months in the summer on the high pastures alone in communion with the gods of the high places. And communion was their animals and away from the pollution of the valleys and the towns, the pollution of the women. And there he feeds on the milk of goats, becomes strong in the mountains, drinking from pure streams and eating wild herbs and so on. And then after he come back at the end of summer, he has right, he may copulate, in fact it's great honor for him to copulate with any woman in his villages. Even married women are not turned down his advances, it is considered great honor.

And I don't know if this is over a period of 24 hours or a week that he has this status, but any of these women who become pregnant, the child is considered sacred. I think the Kalash are right now misguided, they're ashamed of this most excellent ritual because they think Westerners or Muslims or others will think less of them for it. But they follow the high and venerable true traditions of the strong races of this world, while others are infected by feelings of kind of petty sexual morality that leads, in my opinion, to the diminution of the human as a being over many generations. And now this episode I want to advance a proposal, a modest proposal for the introduction of such sensibilities to the modern cities under secular form. I will explain in a moment. I want to advance.

Yes, you may laugh at me. You may call me a pervert and that's okay. I've already called myself everything bad. I admit to anything bad you want. I am Bronze Age pervert. I'm not Bronze Age warrior or Bronze Age priest or king. I've already named myself after the lowest outcasts of antiquity, and so what would you expect? And you listen to me maybe because no one will say these same things, you're tired of boilerplate. I will tell you why I think this is only plausible solution to birth rate problem, the natalism crisis so-called, something very much like what I'm saying here. And maybe you can come to see the rightness of my plan if you understand the true fallenness of our situation, and you learn to abandon delusions both about the nature of women and

about the nature of modern institutions, traditions in the modern world, because we are in a time of no traditions, a time where traditions have been hollowed out and replaced by something else wearing their skin. And most of what I see here in terms of social, political ideas comes from recognition of this, but others proceed as if the zombie things around them are still what they pretend to be. of bringing up a Budulak, the Kalash rite. It's not to adopt Kalash tradition, but to show you that a number of peoples had variety traditions to address problems, natalism, birth, or sexual sphere things, and then maybe take inspiration. Because I say the tradition of the Kalash, as strange as it is, is no more foreign to you than those you think you possess.

Unless you grew up in an uninterrupted tradition, if at some point in your life you you choose instead to follow the religion and ways even of your recent ancestors not even bring up conversion which many people do now but whether you are Christian or Jewish or Muslim or Buddhist and you believe these are living faiths and you say well my grandfather was and so I you know but usually in such cases but you know you have no more connection to that tradition than you do to the Kalash again not to speak of conversion which is you know the fashion now or maybe you would also have equal connection to this following from the Spartans you know the Spartans write a prototypical so-called fascist tribe hardly a bonobo liberal tribe write the Spartans but I read

for you now with this restriction on intercourse the desire of the one for the other must necessarily be increased and their offspring was bound to be more vigorous than if they were surfeited with one another. In addition to this, he, meaning Lycurgus, the founder of the Spartan state, mythical wolf man, withdrew from men the right to take a wife whenever they chose, and insisted on their marrying in the prime of their manhood, believing that this too promoted the production of fine children. It might happen, however, that an old man had a young wife. And he observed that old men keep a very jealous watch over their young wives. To meet these cases, he instituted an entirely different system by requiring the elderly husband to introduce into his house some man whose physical and moral

qualities he admired in order to beget children. On the other hand, in case a man did not want to cohabit with his wife, and nevertheless desired children of whom he could be proud, he made it lawful for him to choose a woman who was the mother of a fine family and of high birth, and if he obtained her husband's consent, to make her the mother of his children. How would this make you feel? Now think about that for a moment. Whatever you may think of the solution, like Kyrgyz thought so much about human relations and human nature that he noticed old men are jealous of their young wives and so forth. I mean, it's far more than, that's kind of a PUA level insight, but how it makes you feel. The reason for this, as also the Greek states, not just the Spartans, who you can say, oh,

I read the Pink Swastika, and it's such a good book, it's written by a Jew-bag rabbi and a Christ-cock pastor, and they make the claim that Sparta is the origin of the gay gay fascist Western tradition that Ned Flanders' Bible supposedly combats. And as absurd as their claims are, filtered as they are through cartoonish stupidity, there is something concrete in what I just said. They fear, they see as something real, as a perennial competitor and threat. But you may say in union with such types, all the Spartans were odd gay people. So you know, you can be the pink swastika type and dismiss them. But then other Greek states weren't as odd as the Spartans. They also felt compelled to do all kinds of strange things.

At times they let the freedmen or even the slaves breed with their women to ensure a next generation of citizens. Why? Because heavy casualties and many such on battlefield wounds and then attrition of citizen roles. The citizen roles were often reduced. They didn't expand because the Greeks cared much more for quality than quantity. But even so, in periods of extreme crisis called oligandria, literally too few men, they were forced to raise up from a lower status men to citizen status. Not necessarily slaves, but there were, you know, resident, just non-citizen men. And give them citizen wives or just invite them to impregnate. And aside from this, the Greeks developed a complicated set of supplements.

They had like supplement tech, a similar supplement obsession to some modern thing you see to increase and spur on not just fertility, but in women, but also sexual desire, even sexual frenzy precisely as another solution to this problem. And it's interesting, Steve Saylor says this is also why certain West African tribes did the same because they lived also under pressures of constant loss, massive disease burden in tropical sub-Saharan West Africa, wild animals which in Africa can give mankind a run for their survival, less so war and other things though that too, but that Africans had a similar sensibility in other words where because constant problems of population decreased pressure they developed adaptations to try to increase the sexual instinct as opposed to other

people's who often had the opposite problem where Malthusian pressure too too much increase because of bountiful harvests and such and temperate weather this is Steve Saylor theory but you know like China has had repeated Malthusian food and water crises throughout its history but places like West Africa and And then ancient Greece, at times, for quite different reasons, you know, that it's interesting that the ancient Greeks of quite different background, different biome, different character, they did the same, at times others throughout the world, by the way, for different reasons who had this same problem that the Greeks had, because where Babi come from? Maybe people misunderstand our problem today. And I'd like to explain on this episode an apology for my modest proposal.

Not so much to tell you that you should be Budulak and act like the Kalash, because I'd like to propose an update and tell you by means of sexual orgies in select locations and for select groups and given certain incentives, not necessarily as a permanent feature, but as maybe temporary one or few times, few years period to turbocharge a change now while there is still time. to you why this strange thing I'm saying is the most plausible solution, whereas again people who recommend instead re-establishment of the traditional family or many similar things, they don't know what they're about, they seem to me just wishful delusions. The re-establishment of traditions is something as difficult or even more than founding new

traditions and like a new religion or something and in the end with all this hand wringing in the press about birth rates. I say that you are seeing, as usual, you're trying to create media careers for themselves. Principally, that's what you're seeing, to position themselves in political struggles, as a proxy for other things. In other words, it's not solving the problem itself of birth rates. They're trying to use this as a pretext. And before you dismiss what I'm about to propose, you know, don't imagine I'm completely, you know, they say I'm crazy, they say schizoaffective disorder and so, but that's the tyranny of Jewish psychiatry. And I'm not completely mad, you see, I'm well aware that you take even the most sexually

liberated European art hoe and she will still say, I don't want to bear a child within the context of an orgy. So just to clarify, I want what you see by the end of this short episode, I think I want to go back to shorter episodes as now I start 201. No one has any attention span, including me, of course, and it's more enjoyable to do shorter shows and segments, shorter segments more frequently. I've been intending to, yeah, more frequent. Anyway, the purpose here is not that I will control a nation and fund actual orgies or be able to affect policy in any direct way, nor that governments or anyone else tomorrow will set up resort tropical breeding camps, but I try to show you that eventually, and I mean by that in the next

few years, such a shift would be preferable, possible, not through, again, direct policy, but what I hope to inspire is the preconditions for moral shift. I think that if you genuinely believed in what I believe, which isn't ultimately driven as it is for other Natalists have these bleak, humdrum, utilitarian concerns. But I have a genuine awe of potential demoniac sacrality of sexuality out of which all life proceeds. And I believe, if you believe this as I do that, if that is intensified, it is the only way out. It's the only way through. Only way out is through. The way up and way down is one in the same. Don't be fooled by the timid designs of people who mimic the past without understanding either antiquity or our own situation. At best, these ladies, and they are ladies,

like older ladies and gentlemen, are political and media entrepreneurs, I tell you, at best. They're more likely, if you give them any power, they'll botch things in America, they'll slightly increase the beige quotient and the power of roasties, that's all. You'll see by the end of this episode, I am the only real natalist. I will be right back. 1,000 celestial golden virgins shower you with golden blessings. this line from original Grand Theft Auto. It was nice, I liked playing an old video game like Wing Commander Addiction. But on this segment, I want to do away with a lot of nonsense that paraded on solution to natalism crisis. I think to really understand birth rate crisis, you must see there is no birth rate crisis as such, not generally, there is a crisis only in the sense

of not enough high-quality people are born, but plenty of others don't have this below replacement, quite the opposite. Men isn't actually quite a breeding animal in the same way others are. But he really still works, so I think best way is to get smart girls to have babies, preferably by smart men, although Schopenhauer says his Plato's Republic is to pair brave men of good character with intelligent women, as he believes the character is inherited from the father and the intellect from the mother. And you will see in passage from Xenophon, I read on previous segment, that he does not, the Spartan law, that thing I read you was from the Constitution of Sparta. And where the Spartan law said that if an older man has a younger wife, he should invite a younger man

to impregnate his wife, there is no criterion for that younger man to be intelligent. The qualities are a man of virtue and good character and brave and strong, and I think that I found this in my own observations to be, it is the character from the father, less so the intelligence. I believe there is even scientific study about this, but I haven't looked at it to see how strong it is. But let's just hedge bets and think how to encourage smart and good character young men and women to have many babies both. And this is precisely who is not having them now. A lot of focus, of course, is on the differential birth rate of racial, ethnic, religious, and other groups like this that correspond to identities. And I say while this, of course, very important,

far more so is the fact that there's a birth rate differential for non-identity subgroups. I want to read for you a chart regarding which groups do and do not have birth rate problems. Selection affects by sex. And it's a slight difference for female and male. But for example, a high selection effect for people with ADHD, they breed, in other words, at considerably higher rates than others. people with major depressive disorder, people with high BMI, this means obese people, so coronary artery disease, this also, marker for, you are more prone to this so you have more babies. Cigarettes per day, that's not too bad. Waste circumference, waste hip ratio, body fat, hip circumference. These are the major markers for having more children, you see. And the only positive maybe quality

that corresponds to greater fertility in the modern world is maybe extraversion, but that can be good or bad. And then on the other hand, negative effects. So people less likely to have children. Let's say people who are tall, actually. You would not expect that, but both for men and women, and especially for women, but for women is significant disadvantage. So tall women have far fewer children, but tall men also are, compared to the other groups, quite a bit less. Cognitive ability, quite a bit less for both. And then the worst markers are educational attainment. For both men and women, very, yeah, very bad, very bad markers for both, you know? so I don't know, so thus you see, ladies and gentlemen, that the West is now, as my friend Mr. Starr said, it is a breathing pen for more locks,

and it cuts across races, actually. So the next generation of mentally ill, obese, depressed retards is quite assured, thank you. It's others that you have to worry about. In fact, I can see many of the solutions currently peddled about increasing the birth rate for, you know, it's, again, non-identity, deleterious subgroups and making it worse for others, multiracial fat imbecile coalition to perpetuity. There's an all-around degeneration that cuts across national lines, actually. I won't really talk about the race aspect on this episode. On one hand, you should want every race to be able to improve itself and to be more intelligent, more beautiful, more graceful. Why not? Why would you? But the competition of ethnic, religious and racial blocs for political power in the mess

of a mass democracy has often disgenic effects, you see. Because leaders of political blocs will inevitably demand more bodies they can claim to represent of whatever quality. Quantity of votes becomes only things that matters to them. So their motivation, the motivation of a party boss in a city, for example, is similar to business owners who look for cheap labor to lower wages. On one hand, you can't blame people for wanting that when they think they see and maybe it's actually so a zero sum competition over the husk who gets the bennies from a state. That's what modern politics is now. So on the other hand, being in a dynamic multi-ethnic situation, the thing is, it corrupts talk of natalism in multiple ways, because the easiest solution for these types, as well

as for business owners, becomes mass migration, either way. You can try to affect somehow the birth rate so that in 20 years you will have more of this or that, but everyone knows political actors don't have 20 year horizons, even in Maybe Lee Kuan Yew again in Singapore, but besides him, who else? People now want a job for their nephews. You think they're thinking about actual well-being of the country or even of their group that they say they represent. You crazy. They want benefits and power now for their sister's husband's cousin's son or this. So they will import. That is the solution, actually for white community too, by the way, that can be part of the solution for white America. I'm not saying import, for example, millions of Afrikaners or whatever.

It can help much faster than fighting the birth rate game. They will assimilate easier actually than, for example, Africans would to black American thing, whatever that is. There are a lot of tensions there. I remember talking to an American black guy in, not in Tokyo, I forget where he was, some other part of Japan, I think Osaka, and he complained that Africans in Tokyo, who are from Africa, that they mistreat him, they hate American blacks. But anyway, not sure about the Russians. They are biologically white, I guess, but not sure how they will assimilate if you bring them in on a block, I mean like five million of them. I don't know if they, you know, the ultimate would be if American whites were eventually in a position to seek political union of America with West Europe.

And at that point, the transatlantic white civilization would have a majority that's near permanent, its future prospects demographically assured. See MICA, the plan. It will be Europe if allowed to deport its migrants, which it will have to do soon simply because it's broke. But once it does that, it will be Europe that will save America in the long term. I believe this why very important to have Trump and his successor Vance and then another similar so that whenever Europe is ready to do mass deportations, which could be as soon as five or 10 years or so, if America is then in a condition where it will not interfere with that, if it's a leftist government of whatever kind in America can seriously interfere

with that, but if so-called fascist governments come to Europe as its economy circles drain, they run out of money, they have to kick out these people anyway, and so a resurgent white Europe cleansed somewhat of detritus from the third world can save America after that as well. And such things, because again I must say, and this is a stupid game to play, I mean both Europe and America are in quite dire situation, and I don't like when they play one-upmanship with one another, but it's without a doubt that America's demographic situation is much worse than Europe's. It's supposedly 59% white. It's I would guess under 50% if you count it correctly, and you can't really solve that anymore through burst rate and jiggering a little bit and telling people that they

They have to, whatever, stop wanking it. You have to find bigger solutions faster. But in any case, a future union with Europe may also affect the birth rates in salutary ways. I mean this as an extended tangent, however, by way of telling you that people, again, who try to jigger with demographic balances through a birth rate game are quite misled. It's mostly unpredictable. It's in any case very hard to manage. I don't know of any empire state or state in history that managed to consistently affect birth rate differentials in the way that it wanted. In the Ottoman Empire, the Balkans ended up having a huge birth rate by the fall of the Ottoman Empire, so the Turks found it unmanageable. They basically decided by, even before World War I, they had to let it go.

They had, I mean there were Balkan wars before World War I, supposedly wars of independence, But I think the Turkish state decided we cannot really keep these European territories anymore. They are greatly outnumbering us already. And that's the story in a lot of imperial and national breakups. The center or some other part realizes these guys bred out of control. We can't keep up with them when we can't keep them anymore. And that can often happen with a subject population. Right now the Turks are having the same problem with the Kurds in the southeast of that country, the Kurdish problem, the Neolithic-Zagrosian, this huge problem, my God, the Neolithic-Zagrosian, Neolithic farmer, there is an account, I forget the name, I will try to, if you check my Twitter

account or on next episode I will find this, maybe I will invite this person because he quite crazy, he quite interesting, he's saying that there are at least three major distinct populations in India. On one hand, you have a native kind of aboriginal like population related to the Andamanese, the Negritos. On the other hand, you have a much later Aryan or step, some type of step component that come later who is much smaller than the others and defined as white in some sense. And then the people, the bulk maybe of what you know as the Indian population, the Zagrosian component from the Middle East, the Neolithic farmers, and this man is an AASI, it's called, I think it's Ancestral South Asians, something like that.

And that is a kind of hunter-gatherer, rather superior population, it's a hunter-gatherer superior population to, I mean, to the Zagrosian Neolithic that came later. And this account makes a case that whatever is good in India in terms, at least let's say, of facial bone structure, phenotype, come from that very ancient aboriginal kind of, they're not quite, when I say black, they're not African, it's different, it's older actually. From that end, then from the Aryan steppe invaders, but that the bulk of the population is this Zagrosian menace, which also forms a significant portion of the native population of Europe, but you're not ready for that. But the Kurdish problem, the big population boom in recent decades, they cause tumult

and very many problems for each, nobody knows what we'll do about Kurdish question. And then there's a very touchy matter of race mixing. So Bino is far more realistic on this than many current-day rightists because once races live in the same place, they inevitably mix. I don't even want to get into this now. It's a big topic for another episode or book altogether. Maybe I invite genomics experts to discuss on this show. But race mixing, in any case, everyone knows the sociological fact that it's not random, has patterns that further trigger people. Like for example, huge percentage of Asian girls are breeding out, that's the most notable example. But it's often impossible to stop things like that, even with authoritarian measures. It didn't work for the Manchu in China,

it didn't work for Roman Empire, not that they seriously tried. The Indian case system was obviously an attempt at this and in the long run did not work. and I know some say that American whites and blacks did not mix and they point to statistical genetics of American white population showing actually very small percentage of black admixture and that itself is not like spread out across the population it's isolated in certain communities. In other words, the average American white has zero black admixture, that may be so but it's just that people with any black admixture usually end up joining the black community by identity which is why in America, you have light-skinned blacks. They would never be considered black in Caribbean or Brazil, for example.

But obviously, a lot of mixing took place. The result is the American black. And then there are certain other, you know, there are melongians, though. Have you heard of melongians? Over-represented on the far right. I believe this account, Radfed Hitler, you may have seen this account, which is apparently Richard Spencer's girlfriend or fiance or whatever they call it now, Spencer being the media's previous attempt at building up a kind of a Fuentes-David-Duke type to hang the banner of retardation and hysteria around the neck of the right, and in this case to embarrass Trump they try to use Spencer for the same purposes in 2016. But yes, I hear that his fiancé or whatever, Radfin Hitler, is this account. I believe she's a Melungeon if you look at her photograph or look it up.

It's a very radical faction of American life, the Melanjians, this mix like a kind of like a zambo in Brazil, you know, spewing out of their Melanjian wombs all over the place in Tennessee, Kentucky, and so do you prefer North Carolina vinegar-based barbecue? I myself enjoy meat with a vinegar sauce. Anyway, look, let me ask you gentlemen how you solve the problem I point out that in fact there is no birth rate problem for retarded Melanjians and let's say the progeny of Albanian Guatemalan day workers, though maybe themselves in the long term they are sterile like work mules, nevertheless the first generation or two of these drones that get imported multiplies, no problem. So how then will anyone in public life be able to address the birth rate actual problem

which is that people of quality aren't having enough children? And the graph I read for you at the beginning of this segment, what the hell is that? It's mostly again dysfunctions that are incentivized to breed. I'm not aware of Elon or anyone else on that side addressing that question. I doubt Elon even knows about it. What do you encourage the right kinds, how do you encourage them to, the right kinds of people to have babies, you know? And they can't address this even by proxy, which is the most you can hope for from people in public life. they can't be cross certain lines, but I'm not aware of any efforts in that direction either by proxy like, hey, let's find a way to incentivize net tax paying demographics

at least or by IQ, that's a bit too far maybe to go in public life or even educational level or property or anything else, even less touchy things that they could, more tactful things they could think of. But no, all I hear are hectoring about how young people are irresponsible because they They want to play video games or go nightclub, and oddly enough they think girls being promiscuous and having abortions is the cause of low birth rate. Some of them think this, which is, you know, you know me, I'm called a misogynist and so on, so it's not out of any slavish devotion to women that I see this is a stupid slander on the female sex. I've known intelligent girls. I don't know any for who they were doing a great deal of abortions, or even when they

are promiscuous, it's not like the ones who aren't are having more babies, it is anxiety. And yet again anxiety and stress that causes them not to have children, it's worry for the future. I'll give you examples at risk of repeating myself, but the truth on this is such important, maybe repeating, you will not be mad at me, but the idea that you will cajole these women into having babies by getting them, for example, to be a religious first is another piece of first-rate right-wing retardation. I think Mr. Elon will, in a very misguided way, take things into this direction. So I hear a rumor that he will announce soon a public conversion to Christianity, which I assume – look, I don't want to second-guess anybody's personal beliefs.

But if this is in fact what will happen, I mean the public nature of such a conversion, The reason for that would be the misguided belief he shares with other tech dorks that he's an influencer and that the way online influence works is, oh, I have 10 million followers. Therefore, if I publicly do this or that or tweet this order, my tribe of 10 million followers would do as I say or some portion of them. I've thought about, I think that's what it really is. That's why he never has funded a study into birth rate differentials in various demographic or across countries, despite being, I hear, quite rich, and I hear being very concerned with this problem. And it's like, from his point of view, why concern yourself with the causes, since he has the solution?

Obviously, through a mechanism of influence and then social contagion, I suppose, he will simply tweet. He will tweet an order telling people to have children, that's what he's been doing. And maybe hitting his head against the wall, and maybe he's taken aback by the fact that After he tweets so much, the birth rate hasn't gone up, and him ringing alarmism bell on that. So, you know, through basically personal advice and awareness raising to millions of people as he thinks, oh, they will surely do as you say, Mr. Elon. So most posters online, I think, even when they're not tech Silicon Valley dorks, they have a similar delusion about their activities, by the way. I think they believe, I'm telling you, no hate,

And I like him, and I will not say his name because I like him, but there is another tech guy I've spoken to once or twice, and he invited me to take my followers, so-called, to his building complex in region X. And he had his own plan to increase the birth rate, by the way, also by telling people of a, he had like a kind of mechanism, you know, in the same way people have like a diet plan to tell you, like that guy Brian Johnson or Moonman, whatever his name is, he has a diet plan for you to live an extra 10 years and this man who again I like him but he had a similar diet plan where if you start at the age of 18 you can have 10,000 descendants within your own lifetime or something like that and he imagined and I I do not single him out I don't think I think Elon thinks the same

way I believe other tech lords also but he thought because I have 200,000 followers or whatever I had at the time that I can simply tell them you know I I take some portion of them, maybe 20,000, my tribe will come to its compound. And so they believe you can really address political problems yourself as an influencer by giving direct personal advice to your followers who are a collection of individuals who look at you on social media, who you are kind of like a personal advisor. To me, this is insane, okay? But I think that's the reason for Elon's thoughtlessness. Like these guys really believe that posting is so influential they can single-handed raise the birth rate by telling people you need to produce child right now and Look at me. Of course. Look what I do. I mean

Some some say this, you know, I present myself as a role model. They say this I mean Elon bizarrely presents himself as a model for other I know unaware that he can only do what he does with the You know autistic multiple impregnation of e-girls and pop stars and he can do that because of his immense wealth and basically pay them off and give them nannies, you know. But he pays his, again, he pays his engineers about what a nanny makes in New York. I don't know what they make in Palo Alto. But for these reasons, I think he believes that if he very publicly converts to Christianity, others will follow him and thereby, because some conservative influencers told him there is a study that he did not read, he thinks that will lead to higher birth rates. This is how I feel about it.

So then this absurd argument is that in order to solve one problem, you need to solve this other bigger problem that nobody has been able to figure out for centuries actually, how to reverse increasing secularization of people, how to make someone religious. It's not like religious proselytes have not been thinking about that for thousands of years. To get people to have kids, in other words, you have to make them religious first. That's insane. It's analogous to what other people say, that you can't solve the immigration crisis until you get people to convert to your own religious denomination. That's a very common argument. I've seen online, not so much in real life, but like French trad cats would never say something so insane, the real life ones.

But I've seen online tradcats say that Japan must be flooded with Filipinos because they are Catholic and that Japan being a pagan animist deserves not to exist until it converts to Catholicism, by which point it will be Filipino or something. So you know, these kinds of arguments, you have to convert to some religion or you have to address the Gazarinos, you have to pray for the Gazarinos, or as the evangelicals say you have to pray for the Israelinos, and if you don't pray for the Israelinos, you're not blessed by God with children, and then the other side says, you know, you have to be blessed by whoever for the Gazarinos, so, or whatever the singular cause is, it's never, they try to glom on to this, you know, it will never work, and certainly not in time, not the religious thing.

I want young women who are nubile and intelligent to have children now, or within the window allotted to them by nature. That means the next, let's say, 10 to 15 years, maximum, you take a girl of 18, okay, and she is maximally up to 35 to 40 years maximum age to bear children. And that's, that's not ideal, when it's that, you know, in the upper range of that, but I'd like to see such girls willingly, happily, each make three or more babies. And again, that's over the next 10 to 15 years, you're not going to lead mass religious conversion, You see, no matter how important your Twitter account is, influencer Elon or whoever, so let's forget these actually conservative influencers who act mostly as demotivators for any cause that they pick in fact.

But you cannot base your hopes for a revival in birth rates in any kind of hopes for intermediary political or religious revival, actually, it's not just religious, but some kind of of, you know, you may be able to persuade by means of religion, I'm fixating on that because that's the main argument that they all say, yeah, just get smart girls to become religious first, then they will have babies, you know, so you can't, you may be able to persuade some ex-gays, I mean repressed homosexuals in the intellectual conservative movement, they go for this conversion thing, and maybe ex-sluts, you know, so again, the ex-gay and The ex-slut is the bread and butter of the religious revival thing, as also of the conservative movement in the capital of the United States for a long time.

But that's a tiny minority. It's visible in Washington DC and now in New York, but it's not... You can get each of those to have eight kids and it won't make a difference. I'm not sure it leads them to have children, by the way, or that... But that's what I mean. Even if they have eight each, it doesn't make... It's a drop. It's like shooting a bullet at a hill. It doesn't make a difference. When it comes to religious birth rate statistics, people go off numbers that have to do with Mormons or with people I know in France and Portugal who are actually traditionalist Catholics. They grew up that way and they do have eight children sometimes. But that comes out of a very different social biome. You can't hope for the future based on limited social and geographic enclaves like that.

But it's not like you get people to also, it's not like you get people to convert for ideological reasons and that then they magically result in having kids. I'm saying those groups have kids, I would guess, for different sociological reasons than religious doctrine or belief. And you're not going to recreate that with posting about kissing the ring of a priest, Mr. Elon, if indeed that's what's going to happen. But regardless, look, regardless of what Elon himself does, the whole argument from religious conservatives by which they mean to piggyback on religious hype and hysteria to supposedly promote birth rates, again, cannot do anything to budge, I tell you, this problem of, let's say, an intelligent woman, 16 to 36 years old, let's say, and it's really the lower

end of that age range that concerns me. And the hopefulness for their future, this, what bothers me very much, do you understand that the entire future of the human race is held in the wombs of such girls, so that when you hear population statistics of, oh, such and such women are married and have children here and there, and this population, overall numbers, in regard to anything at all, but for the future, most of such things don't matter as much as what I just said. particular subset, let's say, nubile women of those ages, how many babi are produced from the wombs of such women determines a future of the species. The leading indicators of that is what concerned me. And compared to general population statistics you hear, so much hangs in the balance of these rather few.

I don't mean by this to cause alarmism, in fact, please, maybe keep conservatives and leftists away from thinking the way I just said. But let's focus lens a little on this group and limit it to, let's say, West Europe, Anglosphere, and Japan. How you induce this group to have babies. And this whole argument is, I guess, preamble, I guess, to ask what can humble internet posters or writers maybe do to this end? Because it's not by means of personal advice to one or two people or 2,000 people, but by bold, modest proposals, such I will make on next segment of this episode, that things may change. Again, not because I say so, but if things move in. But so far, I tell you, the two main dumb proposals are advanced by conservatives. The care is, the left care

is nothing for this question at all, so forget them. But one proposal is the religion one. The other one is dumb because of the scale of it, and it's the economic proposal. You know, like child tax credits or some other things like that, such as the governments of Poland and Hungary have tried, and it obviously don't work, and especially on, let's say, middle to upper middle class white girls. I don't know a single one, I never heard of any such thing who would be swayed one way or another by a $5,000 or $10,000 tax credit, or even if you gave them a $20,000 bounty, forget the credit, like cash in their hand. You get higher than that number, and then you can start talking, maybe. And I think it's certainly the case that when you get above $1 million in income, the birth

rate goes up to over replacement. That's indubitable. The very rich people do tend to have many children. In a sense then, the solution can be ultimately economic, but only in the sense that this amount of money actually does solve many of other of life's basic problems too. Please wait. Then people mention the example of Israel. I don't want to get into, I think I may have mentioned on previous show, the only hopeful statistic out of Israel is that actually women with PhDs have above replacement rate babies. And how they manage to do that, that would be something important to look into, but it's not merely by massaging ethnic ego, because there is no, let's say anti-Japanese-ness in Japan or anti-Chineseness in Taiwan, the way there's anti-whiteness or universalism

of that type, or wokeness in the West or Europe, and yet those countries have very low birth rate. Similarly, Orban has been ruling Hungary for quite a while now, and he has a very traditionalist, pro-religious and pro-nationalist messaging and massaging of ego, and that doesn't work either. It is more likely that, let's say, if it is indeed that secular, intelligent Ashkenazi women in Israel as opposed to, let's say, Arab Jews who are called Mizrahi and so on, if it is indeed them who are having above replacement rate, birth rate, you may need that level of national fear and threat, but translated to countries of the size of the United States or West Europe, that would be a major war and major acts of terrorism that you'd need to induce that.

I don't think that you can plan for that or should. I don't think any government can plan that, yes, we will have mass national mobilization in response, it has to be, I guess, in response to real threat, which I don't know. But look, any of the inducement that are proposed now, I mean, economic, or plausibly can even be made by any public figures, no, it's not enough. And then again, when I say to you the religious and associated sexual morality argument, I don't want to claim these two are always the same thing, but okay, there's that too. And sometimes religious people speak as if religion provides a salutary veil over life. It gives something called hope for the future, which can then, these are the arguments they

make in regards to birth rate, they say religion gives you hope for the future, and that is the only thing that can lead to sacrifices necessary for the making of children. And it's a more positive, that's a more positive argument. Other times they say, no, it's a kind of stricter or more puritanical sexual morality that certain religions provide, and it leads to the same by limiting, they kind of hand wave, they never say how. But neither of these arguments is completely wrong if you take them in the abstract or historically, they certainly correlate or can with decent birth rates. But I think misentirely the psychology of current day concerns are precisely the group I'm thinking of. I've met young people under variety circumstances. I've met them in classrooms.

I've met them in daily life. I go to, when I leave the United States, all types of bars, speak with all types of people from all classes, and I try the same in every country I go to, and with very oddball exceptions, Like almost never. When I speak to intelligent, normal people, they all have the life go out of their eyes when I start, as I sometimes did and still do, to make, just to see how they react, the standard conservative argument that, oh, you need religion historically to turn around the low birth rate and so forth. Nobody wants to be lectured to like that, okay, but they become, on the other hand, much more hopeful when I said, and this is before, I usually said this before Putler started really to embrace public religiosity as much as he does now, I said Putin seemed

to change the birth rate of Russia, at least from its catastrophic 1990s levels, by a combination of economic general betterment and also especially creating hope for the future in a direct way for young people, I mean, where they could see a path in life that they didn't feel they were stuck in a gerontocratic prison. They could see some exciting possibilities, and at these things, usually people's eyes light up. I mean to say that this whole hoary thing about preaching religion to people who didn't grow up that way and doing it, they can sense it's for patently utilitarian reasons that you're doing it, as if you're smarter, you know, you're tricking them into having babies or whatever. It's felt to be disingenuous, it obviously is.

And not only, again, have Poland and Hungary tried to do similar promotions of public religion, no benefit in terms of birth rates. But if you go to Japan, again, or Taiwan, I like sometimes to say they are secular. And in their public thinking about, let's say, crime or immigration, they certainly are. They don't have to have recourse to, excuse me, to any kind of religious or mystical arguments. By the way, not even so much as extolling their own particular national identities or talking in terms that would be recognized as ethno-nationalist doctrinally or ideologically, they just use common sense. That's really all you need. I mean, you have to be a little bit crazy to say, I believe that insane schizo black

people should be allowed on subways to cut necks or to steal and have that be legalized or that the doors of the country should be left open to Sudanese. I think that's actually what takes religious mania to say something like that. So they are secular in their public reasoning, but when you go on the street there is a religiosity that pervades all of daily life there. That is true. Japan, a friend of mine who lives there says this is smart American man's and he tells me it's an orthorexic Bronze Age society. There are open-air shrines where businessmen will stop and bow on the way to work, ask for good luck. And on X, Twitter, last few days you may have seen Japanese people send off an industrial machine used for decades.

They send it off with prayers to its spirit. This is very congenial to animists like me. I feel the same way about objects. In Taiwan you see temples, shrines, outdoor frequent use, people make public prayers, it makes no difference in the terms of the birth rate is catastrophically low. The birth rate is dropping also in places like India and Indonesia and India already below replacement, I think, despite the public religiosity of the people and in the case of India, they have resurgent nationalism with Hindutva and Modi, although actually Indian nationalists I know don't think he goes far enough. But the point is, you don't have the same causes that are blamed in the West in these countries and yet still declining birth rate. So I won't even mention Iran.

I think I mentioned it last time I discussed this, it's a theocracy, there's a low birth rate. So I can keep going, religion in our circumstances will not turn around birth rates, certainly not for this group I have in mind, I mean, that there are correlations in other groups makes no difference. Well, what is it then? What is it that causes high quality intelligent young women in America and West Europe and more broadly, let's say, Anglosphere in Japan, let's concern ourselves just with that. What causes them to have such a low birth rate? Maybe take Latin America to the upper white classes in Latin America. I will come back in a moment to discuss what I think is the real cause. And then also the sinister, the sinister, the left hand path, the Dionysiac solution to this problem.

I'll be right back. breathing kink fetish is. It's a subject of Mutt joke online from people who point out isn't this just normal sexuality and intention is to mock whole sex talk about fetishes and whatever and for those not aware some girls now darkly admit to you that one of their intense fetish fantasies is to be cream pie to have sex ores until you come inside them and some even go extra step and say it's to get knocked up and here you are just making a fetish out of natural sex, so the joke goes. But I think though the joke is true on a level, there's something here you're not seeing. It should be right in front of you because why are these girls calling it this? And it's not that they have these natural desires that they've always had it and that they need to present it

as a fetish to be cool and that normalcy has been pathologized in maybe the way some think. It's unfortunately the opposite. They've arrived at something that functionally looks like natural sexual desire through the means of a fetish, because they had to, because in fact, the Natural Sex Act has had, for them, lost all the lacer, all the charge, all erotic charge. And so that should worry you much more than the supposed proliferation of sexual promiscuity or of paraphilias, and paraphilias can actually be a way people try to stimulate themselves from a stupor. So, see, I just completely disagree with the conservatives on this. They want, they have to pretend that we live in flesh-pot, hedonist society, and that they represent traditional mores,

which we need for healthy functioning and so on. I think that is just catastrophic misdiagnosis of the problem. Asexuality and anhedonia and similar, far bigger problems And for girls, there can easily occur a kind of cocooning that resemble a lesbian, it's called lesbian bed death, you know, two lesbians. That's another famous and accurate joke that two lesbians can devolve into just a roommate. So you have girls, normal girls, even game experts from 15 years ago, like artiste, who lived in a more sexualized time than we do now. And he often remarked that girls will often have months where they, you know, months long dry spells and they think nothing of it. And granted that there's also a phenomenon of

feminists who have sex out of principle without pleasure and they overdo it, but that's also somewhat outdated. There's a funny girl like this in the movie Barcelona with Stillman movie and she says, Deadpan, I used to have sex with everyone out of principle, but now I've decided to have sex only with people I like. And this is, you know, in 1980s Barcelona, you know, as Spain ending Francoism and liberalizing, but that's a kind of outdated phenomenon, whereas lack of appetite and this kind of cocooning, as I say, is far more prevalent now, I think. And even porn, maybe, though it's surely psychologically damaging to some, and maybe if there was a way to keep it from, let's say, people under 15 or 16, at least, maybe that should be looked into.

I'm not sure there's a technical way to do that. But even – and I'm very opposed, by the way, to the EU's laws or identity laws, so-called, online identity, to supposedly stop young people from accessing porn. It's really a way to stop them from engaging with heretical ideas. They don't want them finding my book or such. I mean, I think actually internet has been a great good in freeing young people from centralized state doxies, including especially leftism and liberalism, far more than corrupting their sexuality as parents are maybe rightly afraid, but I don't think you can blame online for that. And I think in regards to porn, though, granted that there may be cases where it causes damage, but I think a lot of people claim damaging effects, but the studies aren't there.

And anecdotally, the men I've known who were most successful with women also watched a lot of porn. And it is also used, I believe, to whet appetite, to sharpen desire. And for some, it's used as a learning tool also. So I'm not sure the claims about its bad effects are backed up by anything more than the wish of some prudes or the stories of people who have, there are, again, people who have had bad experiences with it, as with alcohol, there is, I mean, there's a, there's a lobby in certain countries, especially of people who want to completely ban alcohol, still in Iceland, for example, that's very strong. But there's an element to sex that seems to need if not so much transgression as such. It needs the experience of something, something that's simultaneously spontaneous and exciting

in the sense of lack of control or loss of consciousness, in the sense of loss of calculation of the ego, loss of maybe a general sense of lawfulness, if not particular actual laws or moral rules. Then the religious conservatives tend to interpret the proliferation of fetishes and paraphilia so on, various levels of sexual dysfunction, up to and including anhedonia, as resulting from overstimulation, oversexualization. They really believe people are having too much sex and too casual, it leads to a loss of mystery to sex, which would then be supposedly resolved by restraint and re-establishment of religious moral taboos on sex. But I think they are wrong. I think the problem is two closely related things.

First of all, the medicalization of sex, and it's subsuming under a false casualness of being okay with it, but actually a particular way of being okay with it very much tainted by medical language, a medical pseudoscientific posture of authority, and it's not new. This is already present in late 19th century, and actually it can exist at the same time that bourgeois religious prudery can. In fact, yes, you say I sound like Foucault here, but I do think this one of the principle causes of the loss of glamour to sex, much more so than supposedly people having too much of it, which isn't the case today for sure. But if so, this would not be resolved by the reintroduction of explicit sexual mores and religiosity, because for all the huffing efforts now to pretend to believe in demons and the

supernatural, in fact, no one believes in the supernatural, I think, least of all explicitly religious people. want other people to to believe in it and to confirm their own belief it's a kind of second-order vanity as as is every other belief I'm not just picking on them but it's entirely possible to have strong mores regarding sex and religious practice and still have an entirely deadened sexuality you know and again because of this it's not really scientific it's this pseudoscientific medicalized belief and I don't want to talk to you about third-world ATIQ religious fanatics jerking off in public at internet cafes in Lahore and that's a thing you know they go in Cairo in Lahore and they watch porn together and

or you know the in Sri Lanka a man come to journalist cunt on camera and starts jerking off in front of her I'm talking about middle upper middle-class girls of the kind that I want to induce to baby making okay that I need to keep reminding and the minority of these grew up religious and not genuinely so as as part of a social system that incentivizes fertility, good for them, but that's small minority, nowhere near enough to solve this demographic problem, is what I'm saying, nor is there time to spread this model, which, again, can take centuries or many decades, even if you could do it. Anyway, the second closely related problem, and really, I think the root of medicalization and the loss of luster, the root of it, I say, is anxiety of various kinds,

In part, it's practical anxiety over the future that has common sense basis. In other words, worries over one's condition financially, the crushing effects, for example, of debt on this demographic in certain countries. In others, even if there is no similar debt problem as such, there is the analogous, right? Very rich and the very poor don't have this uncertainty and they breed just fine. It's the uncertainty more than the material deprivation that's the cause. That's why boomer insistence that they could have families in smaller houses with no air conditioning and no flat screen TV, it's true but pointless. Boomers didn't grow up this same atmosphere, uncertainty that especially this demographic has today.

And by the way, the baby boom from which the boomers themselves came, and then the fertility of the boomers themselves, which I don't know, I don't think it was that bad. Neither of these generations was especially religious. In fact, given that the boomers themselves were the vehicle for the first sexual revolution, I'm astounded, still having this conversation regarding natality, as I don't think the spearheads of the sexual revolution were infertile. Some of these hippie sex compounds had quite high birth rates. I have friends who were born in, like, Hare Krishna sex compounds and the like. It is more likely that boomers themselves, for all their faults, at least some among then researched and found a way to sharpen and spur on their sex appetites in a world

where already a condition of bourgeois, prudified, medicalized sexuality was imposed on them. You know, the nurse ratchet thing, plus think like a nun running a hospital with a kind of nurse ratchet, and that's kind of been a type since, well, since the 19th century, and it is an anti-life type. And in other words, the understanding of sex in the 1950s, I think, was likely already desexualized and unattractive, and some had to work hard to re-establish the gleam and magnificence of the sexual instincts. Whatever may have been before the war, I'm saying after 1950 or so, I don't think people realize how dire the situation of modernity is. I've pointed out before, excuse to repeat myself, that the basis of modern family have, you know, supposedly it's being in a romance.

This is the story some conservative intellectuals say, right? That Rousseau did this, that he saw institutional religious extended family structures to support the family were withering away in the late 18th century, excuse me, the attack. And then there arrives thinker Rousseau, who reestablishes the family on passionate love between man and woman. It's a neat story, oversimplified, but what these gentlemen who tell it miss is that quite Just a few things have happened since the early 1800s, including the loss of glamour of men and of manhood in general. As a result, I think of the petty democratic age, right? It's the story of these books. I mean to talk soon about sentimental education, I haven't focused on this wonderful novel,

but they all, these 19th century famous novels tell the same story, the French ones at least. It's the story of a petty bourgeois democratic age in which the spirit of Napoleon, the spirit of greatness is being suppressed and a very low type of man come to the top of society. I think in general the role of the attractiveness of the male element in this whole play of sexuality and birth rates, I think the role of the attractiveness, broadly defined attractiveness, I don't mean just, or even especially physical attractiveness. But the attractiveness of the male, the importance of that is greatly misunderstood, underestimated by all sides. In other words, I think if women are wildly attracted to men and fuck crazy as the ancient

Greeks saw them, which I'm sure they were for the ancient Greek men, but it's relatively easy for them then to discard caution and in a spirit of sexualized frenzy, enthusiasm to want to get knocked up and to carry the babies of such men to term in whatever family format or not, even at a loss, a financial loss. But without that, it's not so easy. And then all kinds of calculations then come to the fore of consciousness, which it's almost never worth it for a woman of intelligence, like I say, until it's too late. And again, with all her peers, she lives atmosphere, constant unsureness and anxiety. The idea some of you have that promiscuity and abortion are the reasons young women aren't having babies today are absurd. I say this as the most important misogynist on the internet.

Young women are not actually whores, okay? They are delaying, again, out of anxiety and prudence. In many cases, anxiety absolutely justifiable. In Sweden, just to keep giving you examples, young people find very hard to find apartment or material conditions at all to raise a family. That is the principal reason for low birth rate, not Scandinavian promiscuity. I believe they were promiscuous in previous generations too. They had very high fertility. Similar in the West and in East Asia. The problem is too much anxiety among the intelligent. In previous times, morality had to find a way to channel real hedonism into fertility, to channel actual fertility, not to channel real hedonism and the fact of babies, to channel

fertility itself into family structure and to form that into a strong state. In our situation, the intelligent young especially are again hobbled by calculation and infertility is different. Crisis calls for different response. And those who are traditionalists who grew up in Amish or Hasid or a French Catholic aristocrat and he desires strong families, by all means, who does not support this? And they hardly need ideas from a Bronze Age pervert to think them through, but I can tell you I feel very sad at thinking certain young, anxious women I knew, and it's a type, it's a very common type, you know them too, and they never get married or they get married too late, they have no children or they have one child late, and this was not really out

of hedonism, and the modern state promotes a false image to young people, a false image of sex, of family, of life in general, and a counter-image that promotes fertility and abandoning narrow anxieties. I tell you it's necessary, and childbirth could be, by a different path, exalted. I believe I know something about women. If they are enticed to worship a kind of man, they will be glad to bear his children with abandon. are other concerns about family or religion, again, the conservatives, but I'm concerned above all with the continuation of the right bloodlines. And the anxiety I speak of is not merely financial or career or status in that narrow sense, by the way. It's also a lot of young girls, and many player alpha men will tell you this, okay,

I'm not referring to myself, but I've heard from many, let me not brag, I've heard from many across different countries, that girls, let's say before the age of 25, are generally not very good at sex. And that's because they live too much in their minds, they can't let go, they're full of pressure and anxiety, of self-regard and insecurity. You can have a situation with many hot girl at that age, they too will often have long dry spell or they will specifically avoid good looking or manly men because they're insecure over their own looks or whether they'll be thought as sexy in the act or they'll lose face somehow or lose control, that's very common. And that insecurity and fear combined with financial considerations is why you can't

usually trust female desire, by the way, as a guide to eugenic outcomes. I think Charles Darwin remarks on the famous eugenic passage from the ancient Greek poet Theognis where he explains that men care much for the breeding of fine animals, but why not for the breeding of, you know, they talk about rams and horses and goats and dogs, but why not apply eugenic principles like that, selection principles to mankind? And Darwin remarks on this passage from Theognis that, see, even ancient people recognize this, But they also recognize that financial considerations interfere very seriously in this matter of female sexual selection, which actually could be, even I think if you left it up to its own it could be eugenic, but it's not even as almost traditional societies, right?

In those cases, families arrange marriages, and these marriages are often unsuitable biologically, And they're made for political or merely financial reasons of the father, not the girl. And it leads to depressing conditions of much of the world where after thousands of years of that, you have predictable results. But even girls themselves, when they get to make a choice, they have similar intervening reasons. You know, I believe if they were able to act on pure lust, and if their lust was not crowded out by fears and calculations of various kinds of human-conscious mendacity, that nature there would provide a basis for somewhat eugenic outcomes, at least more eugenic than the vast majority of traditional societies have been. But that's a kind of tangent point.

Let me return then to how you induce beautiful, or not even necessarily beautiful, but intelligent young women to start bearing children. And it's not through anyone, least of all me posting advice or alarmism over demographics or trying to scare or trick them again through religion or other forms of convoluted utility. Nor I think can you do it merely through government policy as such. It has to be through a spiritual, sexual revolutionary change in the precursors to action, through a change in the aesthetic and spiritual orientations, and this can be maybe affected through variety of arts and movies of all kinds, maybe even theoretically through some kind of pornography as one tool among many. But above all, it's the defeating of anxiety in these women and inducing them.

How do you get them to throw all calculations aside in the embracing of passion? I firmly believe that as difficult as what I'm saying to achieve now, the things are. It's a lot easier to do what I'm saying than what others have in mind, which the re-establishing of religions and traditions and states, in other words, they hope to be a Martin Luther or a Moses or a Stalin, although even actually Stalin wouldn't have been able to solve such a problem. Because modern dictatorships generally lack the spiritual energy necessary for a relevant revolution in the affects. You have to change the affects somehow. You have to awaken life, fertility, mania in young women, you see. And the double way to do it is actually to intensify and free up and facilitate the expression

of sexuality, which has been declining in the last ten, especially the last five years. Again, not that the early 2000s are a model by any means, but compared to now I mean, people are more likely now even than then, and that too was a piss dry time, but they're more likely now to become shut-ins and girls generally don't go out much, night club and such, contrary to what conservatives believe. Girls have herb boyfriends from their own social groups. I see this a lot in Madrid, beautiful girls, nines and tens by American standards, walking around often with a herb-looking dork boyfriend. Why, I assume that they treat like a purse or any accessory. It's not that Madrid lacks for handsome men, but these girls have clearly chosen something they find a safe convenience.

And I doubt that any births come out of those unions, or again, if they do marry, you know, it's like one kid past the age of 30, and that's it. I know horn dog men who report the same. Some of these men make a sport of hunting girlfriends or hunting wives, and it's just even for the most successful men, it's not as easy today. They have to whet their appetites by going after attached women, and it's not because social conservative healthy mores are coming back. It's rather this pathological anhedonia and anxiety that maybe wears conservatism as a false skin. But I say no, the opposite. It's the opposite. You do not introduce another layer of, let's say, obsessive compulsive rule-following rabbinic anxiety over, am I doing, am I offending God by masturbating the wrong way?

No, you go opposite way. How you induce Dionysiac fuck frenzy in these women to the point where, breathing kink indeed, yes, they start to see it much like the Kalash women at the hands of that sacred youth returning from the mountains, they feel honored and excited to bear children. It's not, see it's not a huge trick that you have to play on that. I believe there's a natural instinct and desire in this direction anyway. And I've known some girls and some ones are actually blessed now just by carelessness. They lack that either the sense of calculation or the sense of worry and maybe they just love the idea of having children, they do this already or they want to. But they don't do it within the confines of marriage, generally, by the way. They think that's a form of role-playing.

But I ask you again, if I'm getting too lawyerly here in dealing with counterarguments, forgive me, but I ask you, what is easier? To go down this path back to natural human desire, to let it express itself, to purify it, and hand it to young people with certain incentives – you need incentives, not just – and to allow primal sexuality to express itself, leading to the creation of many babies After which, let's see where things fall after that, because, listen, ancient sexual morality, even of a prudish variety, developed in response to what I'm talking about. I mean, when you think of men's remote antiquity, of how sexual mores evolved and so on, I mean, it's not like someone came and ordered men to have children according to this and that

law and before that they weren't having children, you know. the babies first, then sort out the moral and political part, and what I'm suggesting here is much easier in a condition actually of rotted and defunct institutions, and of universal lack of desire suffocated by calculation and second guessing. This, what I'm suggesting, is much easier than the re-establishment of religious norms, which nobody knows how to do, and as, by the way, a minority in-cell plan, which I haven't touched on here, but the insult plan is to re-establish total patriarchal control and mechanize the rape by force and the reduction of women unwillingly to wife-brewed mares. I myself recommended something very much like this. Should women be reduced to breeding stock?

I got banned from forums maybe 15 years ago for suggesting such things. I'm not opposed to that, but I ask you, you and what army will do that? Maybe do a proof of concept somewhere first in the world. I will listen then. It is now, most incels have no army, no plan to take over whatever some country and turn it into the rape factory. Most incels have become mere cheerleaders for vapid conservative pundits, roasty social media influencers who bizarrely promise to do away with female voting franchise through democratic means. I mean right, that's the sell now. We will convince women to vote away their own rights and then they'll have babies. It's rather odd. If you can convince a sizable enough portion of population to vote away women's rights

or anybody, you know, their own rights to abolish voting for everyone, you need a majority or close to of the women to do that also. So then why do they have to vote away their vote? If you can get them to vote even for something like that, why can't you get them to vote for anything else as well? Why would you want to take away their vote then? We people forget that the vote was given to women by men through a vote, and often men who were entirely on our side, they were not like Charles de Gaulle, he rightly figured that women will vote for him in the political circumstances he found himself. There were concrete instances of men like that, they found themselves in political situations, they realized I can win the female vote.

Possibly Hitler himself, who realized I can win women's vote, why would you want to take it away, then I actually will vote to give them the vote. I'm not even a fan of democracy, but that's the point, right? You can take away women's vote when you take away everyone's vote. And then what you're advocating is a kind of dictatorship, and a military dictatorship I've hoped for somewhere in the West, or close enough to the West to act as an example. But no such has come about yet, and it will take time, and even when it does, what is your plan? in Seljunta that subsumes women to universal rape. To me this sounds fun, but not even Mr. Stalin or Hitler would have been able to achieve this. If you want to talk to Nazis, in fact, although they're hardly a model, they were a hodgepodge

of factions, these factions often had very different aims, but there's a Goebbels speech, many on the right, strangely enough, never quote this speech and don't like it when somebody He's dressing down a Catholic conservative governor who had tried under the language of National Socialism to do some religious conservative shite, trying to ban, for example, I think it was suggested dress in advertising, like a soap advertisement and, you know, it was a conservative religious, you can't do that, you have to put clothes, you know, and Goebbels just plainly says, why are you doing that? are insulting German women, and we are not, and these are pretty much his words, Alfa, we are not a pietist conservative movement. We are a vitalist movement, a movement of life.

And the most interesting part of that regime, which is the inner core of the SS, they had the Lebensborn program, basically sex breeding factories of a variety that I'm proposing here, though I don't mean to taint my own life giving visions with the failures of the Nazi regime. There was that strain, not just in the Nazis, but in the European right-wing sentiment before 1940. It is just forgotten and suppressed now, except within me and a few others. But this, what I suggest, a glorification of the male form and male sexual prowess, as it is this that actually is the life-giving principle and the spiritual root of fertility. It's not principally the female vessel, certainly not the female vessel only. And all pagan societies recognize this intuitively in beautiful images.

Roman boys walked around with pendants shaped like a phallus. Even Fadlan, Arabic explorer, report that in Central Asia among some of the most primitive tribes they worship wooden phallus. The Japanese have festivals to giant phallus, a giant cock they carry it around. In procession shrines it's called Kanamara Matsuri, Matsuri is just named for festival, cock festival. Many of their most primal myths have to do with male gods fertilizing the land by coming on it. You know, that's also in various other primal myths, various peoples. I think the Sumerians have this convergent evolution of various people's myths. It's not that female fertility goddesses are never also honored, but this principle I'm saying now is forgotten by moderns because they've fallen completely under spell of

gynocracy and forget where life come from. Surely you will call me a homo for saying it, and good luck then. But life does come from the erect cock, and listen, there's a reason that truly effective pornography also focuses primarily on the male talent, as that triggers both the male and female audience much more. I mean, oddly enough, though the French and the others were able to do this through veneration and worship of the woman, and that's kind of been transferred to Germanic West or maybe there were other sources within the Germanic West of this, the veneration and worship of women. But there's a point at which arrives the wages of the forgetfulness of the power of the phallus. And the fact that it is female infatuation with male power

that leads to the willingness to throw calculation away and become fuck crazy and baby crazy. Germanic and troubadour worship of the woman came out of warrior barred cultures. It was men like Homer Okay, they were poet warriors. It was basically rock stars slash, you know pirate night Rapists who were making that case for the adulation of women, okay It's quite different from what comes after 19th century the types of men So Aristotle says that warrior cultures are generally either either extremely fond, overly fond of women or overly fond of boy love. Regardless, let's not get into that, I know. But warrior cultures, you could observe, were in any case highly sexualized one way or another. In the case of Spartans, actually for both, Spartan women were famously the most beautiful

in the Greek world. Even though, where you have female fertility cults, do not forget also that the main ads did what they did and their insane orgies were also centered around the overpowering phallus of Dionysus, literal satyrs with giant cocks running around, erect at the center of their communions in the forest. And the Romans tried to ban these orgiastic cults, not always with success, you know, their wives going fuck crazy drunk in the forest, you know, like a Greek guru leader driving. No, I exaggerate only slightly here. Even the ancient Jews whose fertility so upset the Romans, because quite aside from their proselytism, And yes, the Jews very much did so in the ancient world, they converted many. But they probably had a very high birth rate also.

And the Roman stereotype about them, you can find this in Tacitus, is that they were overly sexualized people and that this is what led to their baby making. But okay, look, that's, let's not get into that. It's a slightly different case. I would say ideally, you have a cultural moment where male beauty, manly power and sexuality and the phallus are overly prized, again, openly, which given the misandrist culture of the last few decades, you probably have to err in that direction to a fault. And that would awaken further the requisite passions in young women, I think. And next, you need an intensification of fetishization, actually, of breeding and pregnancy. Yes, no, don't laugh at it. You actually have to make that fetish universal because, believe it or not, I believe that primal men,

primal women, and remote antiquity, They experienced what you call natural sexuality as a kind of fetish and frenzy. They did not have this medical, you know, and whatever you can do to induce ecstasy again, stepping outside of yourself again without second guessing, that is a great good. And then finally, there is the practical side of things, which would never work on its own. It needs this more important cultural, spiritual, pornographic, frankly, component that I've been advocating. But once you have something like that, maybe government or private foundations can step in with incentives, and I propose finally what I made this episode for, and what I will write article for, I will, yes, I must write article on this for my friend Mika for Jacuzz.

But I have in mind a facilitation of Club Med tropical-style sex resorts, and at first I wanted to base it on what Bali was before the pandemic, but Bali is gone now, don't go there. It was a Handsome Thursday youth colony, where Handsome Thursday specimens from across the broader western world, you know, Russia, Europe, Anglosphere, and both there and in Santa Teresa, Costa Rica, it was very amusing. The girls clearly came to leer at Handsome Thursday surfers. So although the beautiful model girls, I think it worked very much the balance of attention in the direction I'm saying now, and I say you induce that and you have luxury resorts where fuck-crazy festivals happen and no birth control, no abortion. And yes, besides the cultural framework around, you know, which

I see not as cultural distortion or a trick, but a facilitation of innate primal human desires that are being held back that have been covered up. To incentivize it though, then you need combination of funding for pregnancy bounties, you know, maybe also for care of children. So to young men in prime years of engendering children who are of high IQ maybe or a combination of other traits this can be determined you can you don't need just one camp you know but so much is gone wrong because of attempts centralization you can have I hope for a future of multiple city-states and multiple jurisdictions where people can do laboratory experiment and try all kinds of things and similarly you can try all kinds of these domains of fuck crazy sex breeding

colonies but let's say you pick high IQ and combination of some other valuable qualities but most of all who are in my opinion per Schopenhauer's demands brave and courageous you can offer bounties of $50,000 per successful in impregnation carried to term and you can offer that to to the girl again chosen for intelligence or other such you offer look I haven't thought through these bounties precisely you could give the woman a large equivalent yearly stipen or even larger, amounting to $100,000, and single moms should maybe have to pass an exam corresponding to 130 IQ or plus, with similar requirements for biological father, maybe single mothers who don't meet these requirements should instead be severely taxed, not incentivized, but it would have to be huge amounts, okay?

Last I know, it costs about $100,000 to $200,000 to raise a kid through the age of 18. It may be more now after inflation. And you'd have to fund at least a good chunk of that. And then it's up to the biological mom and the father if they want to shack up and pull resources and such. But I do believe breeding studs, some men of promise with a powerful suite of traits and especially not just the raw, let's say, calculation IQ, but a sharp creative intellect should be given even bigger bounties, up to $200,000 maybe even for successful impregnation of models and whatnot. And then, you know, first of all, this gives great economic leverage to the men, which can easily lead to family formation if they wanted that.

And in any case, it mostly, again, takes anxiety calculation factor, erases it from both the men and the women involved. And to make it extra good, extra attractive offer, you can also have Lebensborn centers, ranging from full daycare to full kibbutz style communal raising of children. And it only sounds hellish, I mean some people object these things have never worked in the past because conditions are bad, but that's because they were not done with care. I think in this case they could be done with great care, like if insanely well-funded and regulated, the mother who basically does not want to be a mother but who you definitely may want her to have babies, and she can then basically give the child away for adoption,

but it would be assured that the child could be raised in luxury equivalent conditions. She, oh, it's expensive. You know, it's not so expensive as you think, actually, when you consider the alternative. It is also expensive, it was, to lock away the world for two years for so-called COVID. Lots of things are expensive. And this is actually not expensive, what I'm proposing now, because it's the most precious resource of all. Without a sizable and prized next generation of high-intellect, high-energy people, you expect a collapse quite fast, I think, of technological civilization and a devolution of the world to prison slum. Imagine the efforts and expenses that are instead exerted now to have the world be breathing

pan for obese moron, depressed morblocks, or the lifeblood of people, such as I mentioned, good quality people, and their energy instead goes to support what's called the Spiknig cycle. Look that up. Look what that is, okay? The Spiknig cycle. gargantuan expense effort to keep alive 300-pound 88-IQ shibun after a lifetime of state-funded hot chip. You know, instead I offer an image of redemption, of biology redemption in the glory of divine virility and life-giving state-mandated cock therapy for beautiful and intelligent women driven by a cultural support system for the baby frenzy that their natures are in any case ready to welcome as such. The hour is late. It is time, I believe it's time to do away with constipated half measures, pretensions

and the inhabiting of old orders that have senescent and rigid. It is time, instead, let Dionysus be life giver again. The way up and down is one and the same. Until next time, Bap out.